To investigate the scalability of the multi-component Falls After Stroke Trial (FAST) intervention tailored to community-dwelling adults with stroke to enable post-trial implementation.

A mixed-methods formative evaluation of FAST data guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

Community settings across three states in Australia.

Stroke participants were a subset of FAST trial participants (n=50) who were community-dwelling adults who had experienced a stroke up to 5 years prior and were at risk of falling. Therapists who delivered the intervention in the trial (interventionists) were physiotherapists and occupational therapists, trained in the FAST intervention.

The FAST intervention is an individually tailored home safety and functional exercise programme designed to reduce falls and improve community mobility. It is offered over a 6-month period using 10 home visits, two telephone calls and programme resources, for example, manual and worksheets.

Trial data, including interventionist training records and delivery data, resources and stroke participants’ adherence data were used to assess the Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance dimensions of the RE-AIM framework.

The FAST intervention was delivered by 22 interventionists. High implementation fidelity was shown with 90% of the stroke participants receiving FAST dose and content. Effective strategies supporting implementation included standardised programme resources, comprehensive pre-programme training, regular interventionist feedback and interventionist mentoring from experts. Online training and peer support networks will be required for scale up.

This study identifies how a complex intervention to prevent falls after stroke was successfully delivered. The AIM dimensions provided insights to FAST features essential for scale-up. Interventionist training, resources and mentoring/feedback were essential for adoption within the trial. Training and resources should be accessible in an online format for scale up (maintenance).

ACTRN12619001114134.

Current guideline-recommended antibiotic treatment durations for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are largely standardised, with limited consideration of individual patient characteristics, pathogens or clinical context. This one-size-fits-all approach risks both overtreatment—promoting antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug events—as well as undertreatment, increasing the likelihood of pneumonia recurrence and sepsis-related complications. There is a critical need for VAP-specific biomarkers to enable individualised treatment strategies. The Ventilator-associated pneumonia Biomarker Evaluation (VIBE) study aims to identify a dynamic alveolar biomarker signature associated with treatment response, with the goal of informing personalised antibiotic duration in future clinical trials.

VIBE is a prospective, observational, case-cohort study of 125 adult patients with VAP in Michigan Medicine University Hospital intensive care units. Study subjects will undergo non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage on the day of VAP diagnosis (Day 1) and then on Days 3 and 5. Alveolar biomarkers (quantitative respiratory culture bioburden, alveolar neutrophil percentage and pathogen genomic load assessed via BioFire FilmArray polymerase chain reaction) will be assessed. An expert panel of intensivists, blinded to biomarker data, will adjudicate each patient’s Day 10 outcome as VAP clinical cure (control) or treatment failure (case). Absolute biomarker levels and mean-fold changes in biomarker levels will be compared between groups. Data will be used to derive a composite temporal alveolar biomarker signature predictive of VAP treatment failure.

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB #HUM00251780). Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants or their legally authorised representatives. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and feedback into clinical guidelines committees.

The only supportive therapy for patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication among the critically ill, is dialysis. Based on the literature and current guidelines, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with a total effluent dose of 20–25 mL/kg/hour and adjustments to ensure such dose is delivered despite down time (eg, due to surgical procedures) is recommended. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that azotaemia, which can be induced by lowering the effluent dose, may accelerate renal recovery. This clinical study investigates whether a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) for a maximum of 7 days or until successful (>24 hours) liberation of CRRT in critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI accelerates renal recovery and reduces time on CRRT compared with guideline-directed standard dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour).

The Ketzerei trial is an international, multicentre randomised, controlled trial, designed to investigate if a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) accelerates renal recovery and reduces the time on CRRT compared with the guideline directed standard effluent dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour). The study aims to enrol 150 critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either a standard effluent dose (control group, 25–30 mL/kg/hour) or lower effluent dose (interventional group, 10–15 mL/kg/hour). The primary endpoint is the number of days free from CRRT and alive (from randomisation through day 28). Key secondary endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events due to potential uremia, the duration of RRT and intensive care unit survival.

The Ketzerei trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe (2023–343 f-s), the University of Muenster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research.

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06021288).

Surgery represents the cornerstone for the treatment of several benign and malignant oesophageal disorders. Yet synthesising the growing body of evidence from clinical research is becoming increasingly challenging. Evidence mapping with living systematic reviews (SRs) and living meta-analyses offers a structured, continuously updated approach to navigating emerging data. This study aims to provide a real-time, interactive resource to support evidence-based decision-making for oesophageal surgery.

This study follows PRISMA guidelines and uses the EVIglance Studio web application to develop a living evidence map in oesophageal surgery. A systematic literature search will be conducted across the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science and MEDLINE (PubMed) to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and SRs related to oesophageal surgery, without any date or language restrictions. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Key clinical and surgical outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, quality of life and oncological endpoints, will be extracted. Risk of bias in RCTs will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system will be applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence. If at least three randomised trials address the same research question, a living meta-analysis will be conducted using random-effects models. The evidence map will be updated at least every 6 months.

This study does not involve individual patient data or any private information. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. As it uses only publicly available data, this study design qualifies as exempt from institutional review. The resulting evidence map is designed to support fast and structured access to high-quality surgical data - an approach not yet available in oesophageal surgery. The tool is expected to aid patients, clinicians and researchers alike by improving access to reliable information, supporting clinical decision-making and highlighting gaps in current evidence. On completion, results will be published in an open-access format and made permanently accessible via www.evidencemap.surgery, with continuous updates.

CRD420251022736 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/)

The development of effective vaccines targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) has significantly contributed to disease prevention, highly relevant in immunosuppressed patients who have higher incidence of HPV-related cancers than their non-immunosuppressed counterparts. However, the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccine among immunosuppressed individuals pose unique challenges. Immunocompromised patients’ acceptance of the HPV vaccine is influenced by multifaceted factors, including concerns about safety and effectiveness, interactions with immunosuppressive medications and uncertainties due to their compromised immunity. This systematic review aims to identify the main factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among immunosuppressed patients.

A comprehensive search strategy will be executed across databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane Database. The review will encompass the three WHO-endorsed HPV vaccines (quadrivalent, bivalent and nonavalent) and will consider studies related to HPV vaccines and their administration. The scope includes study focusing on immunosuppressed patients who received organ transplants, cancer treatments or are HIV-positive. No temporal restrictions will be applied, and searches will be conducted until December 2025. Observational studies, including retrospective/prospective cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies, reporting factors influencing HPV vaccination in immunosuppressed populations will be included. Studies with overlapping patient populations will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, demographics, vaccine type, risk/protective factors, outcomes and medical history. Validation and cross-verification will ensure data accuracy. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions), and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will rate evidence certainty. Meta-analysis, guided by Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, will employ fixed/random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity using I² statistics.

This research will analyse previously published data, so ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42023452537.

Little research has been done on post-COVID symptoms at 24 months postinfection and on the association these may have on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

We assessed the prevalence and severity of post-COVID symptoms and quantified EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), self-perceived health question (EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)) and health utility scores (HUS) up to 24 months follow-up.

The longitudinal multiple cohort CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) study combines seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public. The participants received questionnaires on several time points. Participants were stratified by: without a known SARS-CoV-2 infection (control group), proven SARS-CoV-2 infection but non-hospitalised, proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the ward, and proven SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalised to the intensive care unit (ICU).

In this study, data of seven COVID-19 patient cohorts and a survey among the general public are included.

Former COVID-19 patients and controls participated in this cohort study.

Former COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 controls were sent questionnaires on symptoms associated with post-COVID condition. The CORFU questionnaire included 14 symptom questions on post-COVID condition using a five-level Likert-scale format. Furthermore, HRQOL was quantified using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire: EQ-VAS and the EQ-5D-5L utility score. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire includes five domains that are scored on a five-point Likert scale: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

A total of 901 participants (and 434 controls) responded at 24 months follow-up. In all former COVID-19 patients, the presence of post-COVID condition at 24 months was observed in 62 (42.5%, 95% CI 34.3% to 50.9%) of the non-hospitalised patients, 333 (65.0%, 95% CI 60.7% to 69.2%) of the hospitalised ward patients and 156 (63.2%, 95% CI 56.8% to 69.2%) of the ICU patients, respectively (p

Many former COVID-19 patients experience post-COVID symptoms at 24 months follow-up, with the highest prevalence in hospitalised participants. Also, former patients reported a lower HRQOL.

The CORFU study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number NCT05240742).

The study aims to assess the magnitude of acute gastroenteritis and associated factors among under-five children visiting public hospitals in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was used to carry out the study. We then employed a systematic random sampling technique through face-to-face interviews to gather the data. A structured questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic, behavioural, environmental and clinical factors was developed after reviewing relevant literature.

The study was conducted in public hospitals located in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

A total of 353 under-five children visiting public hospitals were involved in the study.

The primary outcome of the study was the prevalence of acute gastroenteritis.

The 2-week prevalence of acute gastroenteritis among under-five children was 24.6% (95% CI 23.4% to 25.9%). The study found strong links between acute gastroenteritis and having a household greater than five (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.94, 95% CI 1.55 to 5.60), an unprotected source of drinking water (AOR=2.74, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.82), unimproved latrine facilities (AOR=3.15, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.78), the presence of faeces around the latrine (AOR=3.53, 95% CI 1.77 to 7.03) and mothers or caregivers’ history of diarrhoea over the past 2 weeks (AOR=6.23, 95% CI 3.22 to 12.06).

The overall prevalence of acute gastroenteritis in Jigjiga City was relatively high in the 2-week period. Having a household greater than five, an unprotected source of drinking water and unimproved latrine facilities was a significant predictor of acute gastroenteritis. Additionally, the presence of faeces around the latrines and the history of diarrhoea in mothers or caregivers over the past 2 weeks were strongly linked to acute gastroenteritis.

This study uses nationally representative survey data from the USA to estimate the relationship between a history of heart attack or stroke with the prevalence of mental health symptoms.

Cross-sectional.

Data from the 2019 and the 2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) sample adult interview.

30 872 adults from the 2019 NHIS and 24 593 adults from the 2018 NHIS were analysed separately; a history of heart attack or stroke was determined based on participants’ recollection of previous communications with health professionals.

Poisson log-linear regressions with robust SEs were employed to estimate the relative prevalence of mental health symptoms associated with a history of heart attack or stroke. Mental health outcomes included moderate-to-severe depression symptoms according to the Patient Health Questionnaire, moderate-to-severe anxiety symptoms according to the General Anxiety Disorder scale and serious psychological distress according to the Kessler Psychological Distress scale.

The prevalence of moderate-to-severe symptoms of depression, anxiety and serious psychological distress was more than two times as high among individuals with a history of heart attack or stroke compared with those without such a history. After adjusting for potentially confounding socio-demographic and health variables, survivors of heart attack were 33% and 40% more likely and survivors of stroke were 59% and 52% more likely to experience depression and anxiety symptoms, compared with adults without these conditions. Additionally, survivors of stroke were 76% more likely to have serious psychological distress than those without a stroke history.

Findings from this study highlight the increased mental health problems experienced by heart attack or stroke survivors relative to adults without these conditions. They underscore the importance of addressing mental health concerns among adults who have experienced a heart attack or stroke.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive type of cancer. About 50% of patients will die from the disease within 5 years despite radical treatment. This implies that in many patients, the disease has already spread at the time of radical treatment, even though imaging shows no signs of metastasis. We hypothesise that the standard local staging method, transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT), is partly responsible for tumour cell spread. Furthermore, TURBT (and re-TURBT in many patients) contributes to a significant delay to definitive therapy. The aim of this randomised study is to determine whether multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the bladder, in combination with a single outpatient bladder tumour biopsy for histological confirmation, is a safer, faster, less costly and, therefore, more cost-effective diagnostic pathway than TURBT to detect or rule out MIBC.

BladParadigm is a two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) conducted in the Netherlands. Over a 3-year period, patients with clinically suspected MIBC without evidence of metastases will be recruited and randomised 1:1 to either TURBT or 3-Tesla mpMRI with same-day outpatient bladder biopsy. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) will be used to standardise mpMRI reporting. Patients will undergo definitive treatment based on the results of the TURBT or mpMRI. The study is powered to demonstrate that the mpMRI-based strategy is at least non-inferior to standard TURBT in patients treated with radical cystectomy alone, assuming a relative hazard of 0.55. The required sample size is 360 patients (180 TURBT, 180 mpMRI). The primary outcome is 2-year progression-free survival. Progression will be assessed by imaging, according to the current standard of care. Secondary outcome measures are time to definitive treatment, quality of life (EuroQol 5D-5L), healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness.

This study has received ethical approval from the Medical Ethical Committee Oost-Nederland (NL83685.091.23). All participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion. Findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed, open-access publications, presentations at scientific conferences and stakeholder briefings.

NCT05779631.

To investigate discrepancies in perceptions regarding the accessibility and availability of rest and relaxation (R&R) spaces between hospital doctors in Scotland and NHS Scotland regional health boards (HBs), with the intention of informing best practices for organisational policy on the provision of R&R spaces both now and in the future.

A qualitative study, through an inhabited institutionalism (II) lens, of semi-structured interviews of hospital doctors across the career continuum in Scotland and all NHS regional HBs in Scotland providing written information relating to R&R space provision.

NHS Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Hospital doctors (n=30) who had participated in a larger qualitative study and provided specific insights on R&R spaces. All NHS Scotland regional HBs (n=14).

Although HBs reported the provision of R&R spaces, numerous doctors reported R&R spaces had been removed, relocated or were inaccessible. Furthermore, limited awareness of their availability attributed to inadequate communication, compounded the issue. This divergence between institutional reporting and front-line experience can be interpreted through the lens of II, which posits that institutional polices are often interpreted and implemented differently.

This study emphasises how crucial R&R spaces are to promoting doctors’ well-being especially during the time of high stress. HBs must not only guarantee the accessibility and physical availability of R&R spaces but also enhance their communication regarding the provision.

To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the substitution of surgical procedures in benign gynaecology in the Netherlands.

Quantitative longitudinal study evaluating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nationwide healthcare delivery was analysed across six benign gynaecological pathways from 2016 to 2022 using Vektis and Dutch Hospital Data (DHD), accessed via Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek).

The study focused on six benign gynaecological pathways classified using Dutch Diagnosis Treatment Combinations (DTCs): heavy menstrual blood loss (G11), uterine fibroids (G15), endometriosis (G17), prolapse (G25), infertility treatment (F11) and first trimester pregnancy complications (Z12). All patients receiving care within these pathways between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 were included. Exclusions applied to all patients under 18 years old and, only within the menstrual disorder pathway, patients over 51 years old to exclude most postmenopausal blood loss cases where no alternative treatment applies.

Cohorts from the initial pandemic year (2020) were compared with four prepandemic cohorts (2016–2019) and late-pandemic (2021) and postpandemic (2022) cohorts.

The primary outcome was the trend in the total number of patients in surgical and non-surgical procedure groups across cohort periods. Secondary outcomes included trends within individual pathways.

The analysis identified a significant reduction in benign gynaecological care during 2020, with an 18.3% (p

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted both surgical and non-surgical procedures within benign gynaecological pathways. Reduced care uptake during the pandemic waves was not recovered but instead forgone. The reduction in surgical procedures did not correspond with increased use of non-surgical alternatives. Future research should prioritise evaluating the long-term impacts of this disruption on patients and society.

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of integrating point-of-care ultrasound scan (POCUS) by midwives into routine antenatal care (ANC) services.

Prospective, observational, multiphase, implementation science study.

Primary outcomes included the proportion of midwives who completed training and competency checks for basic obstetric scanning using a POCUS device; the feasibility and acceptability of midwife-delivered POCUS from the perspectives of midwives and pregnant women captured on structured questionnaires; and the proportion of scans meeting predefined quality standards. Secondary outcomes included responses to acceptability-related questionnaires administered to midwives and pregnant women.

Rural, periurban and urban health centres in Blantyre District, Malawi.

Pregnant women attending ANC and midwives providing care at participating health facilities.

Obstetric registrars trained and mentored 45 midwives, and 42 (93%) completed the training. Most midwives (95%, n=40) found providing POCUS during ANC was feasible and acceptable. Overall, device durability was rated positively. Of the 1499 pregnant women who received a scan, 99% (n=1484) reported that receiving an ultrasound from a midwife during ANC was acceptable. Independent assessors determined that over 70% of the subsample of reviewed scans met minimum quality standards.

Midwife-delivered POCUS is feasible and highly acceptable in diverse antenatal settings in Malawi. These findings support task-sharing models as a means of expanding access to this essential ANC service, particularly in low-resource settings.

Black adults are generally exposed to more stressors over the life course and, due to the intersections of racism and economic and social resources, they tend to have more limited resources to cope with social stressors than white adults. This mismatch between stress exposures and resources may lead to dysregulated responses or reactivity to stressors and contribute to persistent racial disparities seen in adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Prior studies examining stress exposures have been hampered by the challenge of capturing stress exposures comprehensively, given they are manifold, dynamic and accumulate over time. The Stress Reactivity and Maternal Health Study seeks to overcome this limitation by examining the impact of physiological and psychological stress reactivity to everyday stressors on APOs.

We are recruiting 700 nulliparous self-identified non-Hispanic black and white pregnant individuals from academic medical centres in the USA. We use ecological momentary assessments administered via smartphones to collect repeated measurements of exposure to everyday stressors throughout the day over the course of seven consecutive days at two different time points mid-pregnancy (14–22 weeks and 22–28 weeks). At the same time, we collect intensive measurements of heart rate variability, blood pressure, salivary cortisol and positive and negative affect. We will use mixed-effects models to estimate personalised indicators of cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and affective reactivity to everyday stressors. We will then use linear and logistic regression modelling to examine associations of these personalised indicators of stress reactivity with placental histological lesions and the occurrence of APOs. Finally, we will use the gap-closing estimand method to quantify the extent to which racial disparities in adverse placental and pregnancy outcomes are explained by differences in prenatal stress exposure and prenatal stress reactivity.

The Northwestern University institutional review board (IRB) approved this study and serves as the single IRB of record (STU00218683). All participants will sign an informed consent document prior to participation, and data will be treated confidentially. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals, briefs, infographics and presentations.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and management of influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) in the outpatient and inpatient settings in Vietnam.

A cross-sectional, observational study.

We conducted a questionnaire survey of 407 individuals with ILI symptoms who presented to public community health centres and the paediatric ward of a public hospital in the city of Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam, from December 2022 to March 2023.

Not applicable.

No primary and secondary outcomes were pre-specified because this study was an explanatory study. The basic characteristics of the participants are presented using descriptive statistics. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the factors associated with the prescription of antibiotics to outpatients with ILIs.

A total of 198 outpatients and 200 inpatients were enrolled in the study. Most inpatients were children under 5 years of age and experienced longer illness durations and higher costs, with almost all patients receiving antibiotics. The rate of antimicrobial prescription for ILIs was 79.3% for outpatients and 99.5% for inpatients. The median health-related quality of life score of participants aged ≥18 years during illness was 0.796 (IQR 0.674–0.922). Logistic regression analysis indicated a negative association between a definite diagnosis of viral infection by rapid diagnostic test and outpatient antibiotic prescription (OR: 0.20, p=0.006).

This study underscores the widespread inappropriate antimicrobial use for ILIs in a community in Vietnam, which contributes to an avoidable economic and health burden. The results of this study suggest that implementing diagnostic tools may support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Body contouring surgery (BCS) can be applied to reduce the physical and mental burden of excess skin after massive weight loss. Self-reported outcomes of patients are used to assess this burden and to evaluate the effectiveness of BCS. The aim of this study is to clarify what is reflected in self-reports of excess skin after bariatric surgery. We hypothesise that the self-reported burden of excess skin is associated with both objectively assessed excess skin and the disposition to experience negative emotions.

This cross-sectional study will include 68 outpatients presenting at a plastic surgery clinic with a request for BCS. Patients fill out two questionnaires (the BODY-Q and the Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire (SESQ)) to measure the size and burden of excess skin as well as the Big Five Inventory (BFI) to measure the disposition towards negative emotionality. Anonymised photographs of excess skin will be rated independently by four plastic surgeons using the Pittsburgh Rating Scale (PRS) Rainbow Classification to establish the objective amount of excess skin. Multiple linear regression analyses will be performed to identify the association of BODY-Q and SESQ scores with objective appraisals of excess skin by plastic surgeons, negative emotionality and demographics. Interobserver agreement for PRS Rainbow Classification will be established by Fleiss’ kappa.

Ethical approval was obtained from the regional medical ethics committee (METC; W20.258) and the institutional review board (Lokale Toetsing, St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein, no. Z23.035). Informed consent of participants will be obtained. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), surgical resection remains the sole treatment modality that can potentially result in cure. Unfortunately, the majority of patients present with unresectable tumours or are excluded from surgical treatment due to complications like cholangitis affecting their performance status. In the Netherlands, recommended first-line treatment for patients with unresectable pCCA is palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. This regimen yields an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 11.7–15.2 months, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options. The STRONG I trial, a phase I study in patients with unresectable pCCA, was completed in 2020. Its aim was to assess the feasibility and toxicity profile of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to chemotherapy. SBRT, delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0 Gray (Gy), was considered to be feasible and safe, with no dose-limiting toxicity being observed. The 1-year local tumour control rate was 80% and the 1-year OS rate 100%, with maintenance of quality of life (QoL). These results encouraged us to initiate the STRONG II trial, aiming to investigate the efficacy of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in a larger patient cohort.

STRONG II is a single-arm, multicentre phase II study. Patients with non-metastatic unresectable pCCA (T1-4, N0-2) are eligible. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled in six academic centres in the Netherlands and two in Belgium. SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0–4.5 Gy. The primary endpoint is local tumour control, defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) V.1.1. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, biliary stent-related events, progression-free survival, OS and QoL using the EuroQoL five-dimensional, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Biliary Module (QLQ-BIL21). In addition, we will explore the predictive value of the peripheral immunological status (immune-related proteins and serum functional immunological status assay) and its dynamics in determining survival outcomes. For this explorative translational study, two blood samples will be collected, one before the start of chemotherapy and another after completing chemotherapy.

Approval of the study was obtained on 5 June 2024 by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (ID: NL86210.078.24). The anticipated time frame for patient enrolment is July 2024 to December 2027. The main study findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals, and presented at national and international conferences.

NCT06493734 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

COVID-19 in children is generally of short duration, but some may take longer to recover. This study investigated the time to symptom resolution following SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in a community setting on the outskirts of an urban centre in Brazil.

Prospective cohort study.

This is a community-based cohort of children living in Manguinhos, a favela in Rio de Janeiro. The cohort was followed through home visits and telephone monitoring of symptoms. The analysis focused on symptomatic children from this cohort with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recovery time was defined as the interval between the first date with symptoms and the first date without symptoms following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.

A total of 1276 children (boys and girls aged 2–

COVID-19 recovery time, assessed based on change points on the symptom persistence probability curve (Kaplan-Meier).

Among children who tested positive, 148 (60%) were symptomatic. The median recovery time was 11 days (IQR: 7–16). Two inflection points were identified on the Kaplan-Meier curve: days 16 and 34. Children who were ill during the Omicron wave took longer to recover. More boys became asymptomatic within the first 15 days; about 93% of girls recovered by day 33, and boys were more common among those who recovered in ≥34 days. Children aged 6–

Among children from a vulnerable area in Rio de Janeiro, recovery time was longer than that reported in other countries, with 9.5% of children experiencing persistent symptoms for more than 33 days. These findings are crucial for understanding the implications of COVID-19 in specific socioeconomic contexts and the dynamics of paediatric recovery in community settings.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) affects 1–5% of the paediatric population, including 55–90% of children with Down syndrome (DS), and has been associated with negative effects on neurocognitive development, cardiovascular health, immune development and quality of life. In-lab attended polysomnography (PSG) is currently the gold standard for the diagnosis of OSA in children, but it poses challenges due to the burden on families and limited testing facilities. Home sleep apnoea testing (HSAT), an unattended sleep test done at home, is an accepted alternative for adults but lacks sufficient evidence to be used clinically for the evaluation of OSA in children. HSAT may be especially beneficial for children with DS or others with sensory issues or those who struggle with sleeping in a laboratory setting overnight.

This single-centre trial compares HSAT to PSG for the diagnosis of OSA in children, including those with DS. The trial will enrol 317 children 5–12 years old, including approximately 100 with DS. The primary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of HSAT compared with PSG for OSA evaluated through ROC. Secondary outcomes include the agreement between HSAT and PSG for therapeutic decision-making and comparison of preference and acceptability of HSAT versus PSG. This trial seeks to evaluate HSAT as an alternative diagnostic tool for paediatric OSA, potentially expanding testing options for clinicians and families.

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (#21–0 19 533). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, and no identifiable data will be reported.

NCT05382754.

Despite being a leading cause of female morbidity and mortality, female-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) is understudied, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Pregnancy complications involving the placenta, including pre-eclampsia, pregnancy-induced hypertension and foetal growth restriction, are thought to reflect global maternal vascular derangements that indicate a twofold to eightfold increased risk of future CVD. This calls for a better understanding of female cardiovascular pathophysiology to allow development of targeted screening and prevention strategies.

Acute atherosis is a placental vascular lesion, which histologically resembles systemic atherosclerosis. The PlacEntal Acute atherosis RefLecting Subclinical atherosclerosis study investigates the association between placental acute atherosis lesions and subclinical systemic atherosclerosis up to 20 years postpartum.

This study will improve our understanding of the relationship between pregnancy complications and CVD to identify potential prevention targets and treatments. In addition, it could determine whether the placenta can improve identification of young women at high risk of CVD. These women could benefit from risk-reducing interventions.

This longitudinal prospective cohort study will include women who are either currently pregnant or from a historical cohort. Both groups will have placental histopathology and a single postpartum CVD assessment. The CVD assessment will include medical history taking, blood tests, electrocardiography and echocardiography. Additionally, coronary CT angiography focusing on the presence of atherosclerotic plaques and calcium score will be carried out.

The currently pregnant women will either have a pre-eclamptic pregnancy (pre-eclamptic group) or an uncomplicated normotensive pregnancy (uncomplicated group), and their placenta will be collected prospectively. The single CVD assessment will be carried out 6–36 months postpartum.

Women from the historical cohort had a pre-eclamptic pregnancy 10–20 years ago. Placental tissue is available for reanalysis. The single CVD assessment will take place immediately and corresponds with 10–20 years postpartum.

Exclusion criteria are contraindications to diagnostic assessment necessities: iodinated contrast, beta-blockers or glyceryl trinitrate. Women with uncomplicated pregnancies will be excluded if they have a pre-existing auto-immune condition, chronic hypertension or diabetes mellitus. In the pre-eclamptic group, there are no additional exclusion criteria.

Ethical approval was granted by the Medical Ethics Committee in Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (NL52556.068.15/METC152019). Participants will give written informed consent. Results will be shared in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

NCT05500989; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a major complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Currently, no effective therapy exists to reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in reducing AKI in outpatient settings for patients with chronic kidney disease. We hypothesised that perioperative SGLT2 inhibition will also reduce AKI incidence after cardiac surgery according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria.

We designed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, triple-blinded, superiority trial. A total of 784 patients, aged above 18 years, undergoing cardiac surgery will be included with stratification for sex and type 2 diabetes in a 1:1 ratio. Patients will receive either dapagliflozin 10 mg or placebo from the day before until 2 days after surgery. Serum creatinine will be measured preoperatively and daily for the first 7 days after the operation, and urine output will be measured until the urinary catheter is removed. The primary outcome is the incidence of postoperative AKI according to the KDIGO criteria.

The medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (UMC) and the Dutch competent authority approved the study protocol (currently, version 9, 19 January 2024). This is an investigator-initiated study. The Amsterdam UMC, as sponsor, retains ownership of all data and publication rights. After completion of the trial, results will be disseminated to participants, patient societies and physicians via a network meeting and digital newsletter. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed international medical journal and presented on (inter)national congresses.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05590143.