Conectar
This study defines adverse religious experiences (AREs), describes how these gendered harms affect women and develops a Classical Grounded Theory (CGT) model of women's recovery and inform trauma- and gender-responsive nursing practice.
Using the CGT design, the study explores women's lived experiences with AREs, focusing on their primary concern and the strategies they used to address it.
Fifteen North American women participated in open-ended, semi-structured interviews conducted between May and June 2023. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently by using constant comparison. Theoretical saturation was reached by approximately 12 interviews and was confirmed through three additional interviews. Theoretical coding was guided by Glaser's Six Cs.
The central issue was Loss of Self, with limited agency, embodiment and autonomy due to internalised religious control. This study conceptualises AREs as a gendered determinant of health and introduces a nursing-generated explanatory model of women's recovery from religious harm. The Basic Social Process, Discovering Self, includes six cyclical phases: Living with Toxicity, Loss of Self, Recognizing Woundedness, Leaving Negativity, Seeking Restoration and Awakening to Wholeness. Analytic integration with the Six Cs showed that doctrinal rigidity, gendered hierarchies, conditional belonging, turning points and psychological, spiritual and relational consequences shaped individual recovery paths. Recovery proved a nonlinear, whole-person process spanning spiritual, physical, sexual and relational domains.
Discovering Self offers the first explanatory model of women's recovery from religious harm, identifying mechanisms of oppression and pathways for reclaiming agency, embodiment and voice.
This study provides a roadmap for trauma- and gender-responsive nursing care, education and policy. The findings align with global priorities in health and gender equality.
This study followed the SRQR guidelines and used CGT methodology.
Patients or the public were not involved in the study.
To compare attitudes and perceptions towards opioid use disorder among people with opioid use disorder and emergency providers, describe interactions between the two groups, and identify barriers to providing and receiving care.
Mixed methods observational study.
Participants were recruited from an academic, tertiary care hospital and a community-based harm reduction agency in New England. Emergency healthcare providers (nurses, physicians, and paramedics) and adult people with opioid use disorder were enrolled. Electronic surveys were administered to providers, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with opioid use disorder and a subset of providers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for surveys, and directed content analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-eight providers completed the survey, 11 of whom also completed a semi-structured interview. Twenty-two people with opioid use disorder completed the semi-structured interview. Both providers and people with opioid use disorder agreed that addiction is a disease; however, opinions differed on the extent to which personal choice played a role in the onset of opioid use disorder. Participants described how factors such as experiencing homelessness, alongside other personal or familial challenges, contributed to ongoing substance use and presented barriers to accessing healthcare. There was discordance in priorities between providers and people with opioid use disorder, which often drove conflict and perceived stigma. Both groups described physical and emotional trauma from prior interactions, which shaped expectations of future interactions and biases towards each other.
Educational initiatives should arm providers not only with clinical knowledge about opioid use disorder but with skills to recognize implicit biases, navigate unique barriers related to social determinants of health, and effectively deploy shared decision-making techniques. Healthcare organizations should provide support for trauma that emergency care providers are exposed to in caring for people with opioid use disorder.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ)–32 item checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explain the relationship between occupational well-being dimensions and overall occupational well-being among nurse and social care educators, with particular focus on hybrid work status.
A cross-sectional survey study.
The quantitative data were collected from Finnish nurse and social care educators (n = 367) in autumn 2023 and analysed using multiple regression with interaction analysis.
Overall personal occupational well-being was rated higher than work community occupational well-being, especially among hybrid-working educators. In models including all occupational well-being dimensions (working conditions, work community, worker's resources and work, and professional competence), only work community and worker's resources and work remained statistically significant positive relationships with occupational well-being. Hybrid work status moderated these relationships: the relationship between work community and occupational well-being was stronger among on-site educators, and professional competence was associated with work community occupational well-being only among them.
Voluntary hybrid work may support personal occupational well-being among nurse and social care educators, yet the enduring importance of work community—particularly for on-site educators—highlights the need to sustain work community resources across all work modalities.
Occupational well-being strategies in educational institutions could benefit from reflecting diverse work arrangements. For hybrid models, emphasis might be placed on combining flexible work options with support for self-leadership and virtual community-building to ensure equitable well-being across modalities. Strengthening team-based collaboration can help maintain connection, competence, and resilience regardless of work setting.
This study provides evidence on the factors supporting occupational well-being among nurse and social care educators depending on the hybrid work status. Work community and individual resources are key predictors, with implications for tailoring support strategies in institutions adapting to hybrid work models.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology STROBE guidelines.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
This reflection examines the past 50 years of Indigenous nursing, highlighting both progress and persistent inequities. Fifty years ago, Indigenous nurses were largely invisible within the profession, their voices marginalised and their cultural backgrounds undervalued. Although numbers have grown, Indigenous nurses, particularly Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand, remain significantly underrepresented in the workforce relative to population need. Enduring structural and systemic barriers continue to impede recruitment, retention and the integration of Indigenous worldviews into nursing curricula and practice. This commentary refers to historical and contemporary contexts that shaped this landscape, including colonisation, racism and the suppression of Indigenous knowledge. It acknowledges significant milestones such as Dr. Irihapeti Ramsden's leadership in establishing Kawa Whakaruruhau and Cultural Safety, while also noting the political backlash that diluted its original focus on Māori health inequities. Indigenous nurses, past and present, bring culturally grounded, relational and holistic approaches to care, bridging the clinical and cultural worlds and building trust with Indigenous communities. Their growing scholarly contributions and international collaborations—such as the Indigenous Global Research Alliance in Nursing—are advancing Indigenous methodologies and evidence. While gains have been made, the future requires culturally responsive pipelines and collective commitment to addressing inequity, racism and structural injustice in nursing.
To critically analyse the federal Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) using the Integration Continuum Framework and the Conceptual Model for Nursing and Health Policy, identifying system-level strengths, equity gaps and nursing implications for long-term care reform.
The U.S. long-term care system remains fragmented and institutionally biased, disproportionately affecting dual-eligible older adults who account for outsized healthcare expenditures despite comprising just 17% of Medicare beneficiaries. Permanently authorised under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, PACE delivers fully integrated, community-based care for individuals aged 55 and older who qualify for nursing home-level services but prefer to remain in their communities.
A policy analysis guided by dual conceptual frameworks assessing PACE structure, implementation and impact across four policy outcome levels: efficacy, effectiveness, equity and justice.
This policy analysis was conducted between May and July 2025. Two conceptual frameworks were applied to examine PACE structure, implementation and outcomes. Data sources included peer-reviewed studies, federal legislation, policy documents and grey literature published between 2020 and 2025, supplemented by international integrated care literature.
PACE demonstrates strong efficacy and effectiveness, with fully integrated interdisciplinary teams and reduced institutionalisation for enrolled older adults. However, the program falls short on equity and justice due to limited geographic reach, racial and ethnic disparities in enrollment, exclusion of Medicare-only populations and persistent nursing workforce challenges.
PACE exemplifies a high-functioning integrated model of community-based long-term care, but current policy constraints prevent it from achieving scale and equity. Without eligibility expansion, financing reform and workforce investment, its transformative potential will remain unrealised. Nurses are central to this vision and must be empowered as clinical leaders and policy advocates to sustain care coordination and advance health equity in aging populations.
To explore the views of healthcare practitioners in Britain regarding the role of midwives and nurses in the delivery of medical and surgical abortion.
An observational study of the Shaping Abortion for Change study healthcare practitioner survey (2021–2022).
Relationships between healthcare practitioner type, participant characteristics, knowledge of and attitudes towards abortion, and views about nurses' and midwives' role in abortion care were examined using Pearson's Chi-squared tests of association and multivariable logistic regression.
Amongst 763 participants including doctors, nurses, midwives and pharmacists, 71.6% supported specialist nurses in sexual and reproductive health and abortion clinics and hospitals, expanding their roles to include prescribing abortion medications and surgical abortion methods. Support was lower for midwives (35.8%) and primary care nurses (32.5%). There was considerable support for all nursing and midwifery groups to be involved in adjacent tasks of abortion care. Differences in support by healthcare practitioner type persisted after adjustment for exposure variables.
There is strong support for specialist nurses to expand their role in abortion care. This change could be implemented following clarification of the legal position. Some healthcare practitioner groups are more reluctant to support broader involvement of nurses and midwives in abortion provision.
Expanding specialist nurses' role in abortion care could increase service capacity and improve patient access and experience. Understanding and addressing the concerns of healthcare practitioners opposing this change is critical for successful implementation and patient safety.
This study addresses the potential for nurse and midwife role expansion in abortion care. The findings highlight broad support for specialist nurses whilst identifying barriers to wider role expansion. The research informs policy discussions on workforce optimisation and access to abortion services across Britain.
This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies.
In the SACHA study, patient and public involvement was included at all stages to inform study design, recruitment, data collection and analysis.
To explore public health nurses' experiences of child maltreatment preventive work in primary healthcare.
The metasynthesis approach was based on the guidelines by Sandelowski and Barroso for synthesising qualitative research.
The quality of the included studies was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Qualitative Research. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.
Searches were conducted in five electronic databases: Cinahl, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and SocINDEX in May and July 2024, and updated in April and December 2025.
Thirteen qualitative studies were included, and five themes were developed: Insufficient knowledge about when and how to act, building a therapeutic relationship with parents, keeping the child's best interest in focus, in need of better interdisciplinary support and ambivalence in addressing child maltreatment.
Public health nurses face challenges in child maltreatment preventive work, including insufficient knowledge and limited interdisciplinary support. Even so, public health nurses demonstrate a strong commitment to children's safety and well-being and to building relations with families.
The findings suggest an increased focus on strengthening public health nurses' knowledge of child maltreatment and improved interdisciplinary collaboration.
The findings are of interest to healthcare professionals and health authorities to improve child maltreatment preventive work in primary healthcare.
This review adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42025637855.
To explore the meaning older Asian immigrants attribute to social isolation and loneliness, their management strategies, utilisation of resources and impact on health.
Systematic review of qualitative studies.
AgeLine, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched in September 2024.
Inclusion criteria: participants were Asian immigrants to Western countries aged 65 and over, community-living and experiencing social isolation and loneliness. Antonovsky's Sense of Coherence was used to frame the thematic analysis.
Ten papers were included and analysed deductively using elements of the sense of coherence framework: • Comprehensibility: Social isolation and loneliness are viewed as multifaceted, influenced by cultural and environmental dislocation, language barriers, intergenerational conflicts, deteriorating health and mobility, and socioeconomic challenges. • Manageability: included engaging in culture-specific community programs, family and ethnic community support and living within ethnic enclaves mitigated isolation and loneliness. • Meaningfulness: Strong family ties, active community involvement, spirituality, volunteerism, and cultural practices fostered resilience. However, accepting the changing values of their new world, living independently, and carving their own niche provided meaning to their transformed reality.
Older Asian immigrants experience social isolation and loneliness through a cultural lens, shaped by migration experiences, language barriers, and shifting family dynamics. Cultural roots, family ties, spirituality, community, acceptance, and independence enhance sense of coherence. Recognising the dynamic interplay between cultural identity, resilience, and adaptation is key to understanding their lived experience.
This review informs culturally sensitive interventions, guiding healthcare, community services, and policy to support social participation, mitigate loneliness through ethno-specific activities, and improve the quality of life for aging immigrant populations in Western countries.
The review was undertaken and reported using the PRISMA guidelines.
None.
PROSPERO (CRD42023425752)
To assess public support and predictors of favourable or unfavourable views towards expanding Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) roles in Germany.
A quantitative, cross-sectional survey using Germany as a national case study.
Data came from the Politikpanel Deutschland, an online survey conducted 15–28 July 2024. After exclusions, 6733 respondents were included. Data were weighted by age, gender, federal state, and voting intention. Descriptive statistics, subgroup comparisons, and multinomial logistic regression were applied to analyse attitudes towards APNs, with results reported as average marginal effects and predicted probabilities.
Overall, 52.8% of respondents supported expanding APN roles, 25% opposed, and the remainder were undecided. Support was stronger among younger, male, and highly educated respondents, and those open to digital health technologies. Support was lower in East Germany and the city-states Berlin and Bremen, while it was higher in the south-west and north. Political ideology strongly predicted attitudes: supporters of right-wing parties were more likely to oppose, whereas left-leaning voters were more supportive.
Public support for expanding APN roles in Germany is moderate but uneven across demographic, regional, and political cohorts. Younger individuals and those favouring digital health technologies may drive future acceptance, while political resistance and regional disparities remain barriers.
This first, large-scale survey of German public attitudes towards APNs suggests that policymakers should (i) link APN role expansion with digital health innovations, (ii) address regional differences through tailored communication, and (iii) ensure that patients, physicians, and healthcare professionals perceive APN integration as enhancing, not diminishing primary care quality. Strengthening legal and educational frameworks and fostering collaboration between physicians and nurses will not only be essential to integrate APNs into Germany's healthcare system and, thereby, mitigate physician shortages, but also to foster public acceptance of APNs.
None.
CROSS-checklist.
Healthcare systems are undergoing major transformation driven by technological progress, growing patient involvement, workforce shortages, complex care needs, and rising costs. Against this backdrop, value-based healthcare has gained traction, yet the notion of ‘value’ remains ambiguously defined.
To clarify the concept of ‘value’ in value-based healthcare.
We conducted a concept analysis using Walker & Avant's eight-step method: (1) Select a concept; (2) Determine the aims; (3) Identify uses; (4) Define the concept's attributes; (5) Identify the model case(s); (6) Identify additional cases; (7) Identify antecedents and consequences; and (8) Define empirical referents. Data Sources: Scoping review methods following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations were used to introduce rigour in locating, screening, and extracting data. We used a deductive thematic analysis for data analysis.
We selected the concept of value in value-based healthcare because it lacked conceptual clarity to support healthcare systems transformations. We propose that value arises when outcomes-to-costs ratios (empirical referents) are considered in processes (uses) addressing healthcare systems transformations, characterised by more informed and engaged patients and rising costs (antecedents). Model case included consideration for all components (health, non-health outcomes, and direct, indirect, social costs) of the ratio, whereas additional cases showed that consideration for most, not all, or none of these components led to partial or no value creation. Value is used from individual to collective dimensions and at clinical, organisational and system levels (attributes) to improve patient experience, care team well-being, health equity, and population health, and to reduce costs (consequences).
A shared understanding of ‘value’ can guide its design, measurement, and implementation to support successful transformations toward value-based healthcare. Implications: Our conceptual proposition of ‘value’ within value-based healthcare establishes a framework for a common understanding of ‘value’ that enables the successful transformation of health systems toward value-based healthcare.
To synthesise evidence on wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring in adult hospital inpatients, focusing on clinical effectiveness, nursing perspectives, workflow impact, patient experience and resource implications.
Scoping review.
Joanna Briggs Institute methodology reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane), Scite.ai, and hand searching for studies published between January 2015 and November 2025. Data were synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixty-seven studies from 19 countries were included. Four integrative themes were identified. (1) Enhancing clinical safety through continuous monitoring: wearable devices consistently enable earlier recognition of physiological deterioration; however, downstream outcomes such as length of stay and transfers to intensive care units were mixed and context dependent. (2) Transforming nursing practice and workflow integration highlighted improved situational awareness and potential efficiency gains, alongside challenges related to alarm overload, parallel documentation and implementation workload. (3) Patient experience of wearable monitoring: most patients reported reassurance and perceived safety, though experiences reflected a tension between monitoring as care and monitoring as surveillance; discomfort, anxiety, and privacy considerations were infrequently examined. (4) Economic and organisational consequences: potential system value was suggested through workforce efficiencies, but economic benefits were largely inferred, with infrastructure and training costs often underreported.
Wearable continuous monitoring technologies show clear potential to support nursing observations enabling improved early detection of deterioration. Realising these benefits depends on effective integration into workflows, robust governance, and sustained nursing leadership rather than technological capability alone. Significant evidence gaps remain regarding long-term outcomes, economic evaluation, and large-scale implementation.
Wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring have the potential to transform inpatient surveillance by enabling earlier recognition of physiological deterioration and enhancing nurses' situational awareness. This scoping review synthesises international evidence demonstrating that, although wearable monitoring can improve patient safety and workflow efficiency, its impact depends on effective integration into nursing practice, governance structures, and organisational preparedness. Continuous monitoring also introduces new challenges including alert fatigue, data interpretation, and workflow redesigns, highlighting the vital role of nursing leadership in digital health implementation. The review also identifies critical evidence gaps, particularly concerning long-term clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-effectiveness, providing priorities for future research and policy to promote safe, ethical, and sustainable adoption.
None.
To examine the contexts and mechanisms that enable compassionate mentorship in healthcare, in order to generate evidence-informed insights for fostering healthier, more sustainable work environments.
A rapid realist review.
Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE (1946–December 2024), Embase (1974–December 2024) and CINAHL (1981–December 2024). Additional sources included Google Scholar searches, reference list scanning and grey literature (e.g., practice guidelines, policy briefs, professional reports). The review was conducted between August 2024 and July 2025.
Realist review methods were applied to answer the question: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and why? The review proceeded in four stages: defining scope and research questions with an expert panel; iterative searching and screening; data extraction and synthesis into context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs); and development of a programme theory.
Twenty-two documents were included, spanning nursing, medicine, allied health and interdisciplinary contexts. Six CMOCs were identified, encompassing the following themes: (1) relationship compatibility; (2) vulnerability and self-exploration; (3) growth through untapped strengths; (4) anti-oppression and equity; (5) mentors' pride and confidence; and (6) culture of mentorship. The resulting programme theory conceptualises compassionate mentorship as a dynamic, multi-level process with cumulative impacts on individual well-being, professional development and organisational culture.
Compassionate mentorship represents not only a relational practice but also a structural intervention for healthier workplaces. Programmes should prioritise compatibility, cultivate psychological safety, invest in mentee growth, embed equity, recognise mentor contributions and institutionalise mentorship culture.
These strategies offer actionable pathways to strengthen workforce resilience, retention and sustainability.
One co-author is a retired nurse, ethicist and person with lived experience in the healthcare system. This co-author was integral to this project, serving on the scientific steering committee from project conceptualisation and funding application through study conduct and publication.
To shed new light on the management practice and needs for support, mentoring and continuous education of nurse managers (head nurses and assistant head nurses) during and since the COVID-19 pandemic to identify the innovative strategies they put in place to mobilise teams and foster a healthy work environment.
A multi-centre exploratory descriptive study with a qualitative descriptive exploratory design was used.
10 focus groups held between December 2021 and July 2022, five from a Canadian healthcare centre and five from a Swiss healthcare centre, were conducted with 35 nurse managers. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Six central themes emerged: (1) A difficult context to navigate: Continuous adaptation necessary to navigate through difficulties and a rapidly changing context, (2) Maintaining a visible presence and engaging in active listening with team members to promote commitment, motivation and mobilisation, (3) Frequent short meetings, instant and transparent communication, (4) Role legitimacy and recognition, along with continuous professional development, (5) Integration and cohesion among team members, and the quality of care and (6) Shared leadership: A key strategy to prioritise.
The present study offers unique insights into the innovative strategies nurse managers have put in place to ensure the optimal functioning of their care team, to foster a positive work climate, and to ensure the commitment, motivation and mobilisation of their teams. A shared leadership approach appears to be a key lever of action to optimally tackle the present and future needs and challenges of nurse managers.
This study highlights key managerial strategies that can be beneficial in all contexts or during future crises, ultimately helping healthcare organisations and nurse managers have a better understanding of their role and influence.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
No patient or public contribution.
To critically examine the structural exclusion of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared faculty from academic advancement and promotion pathways and to propose reforms grounded in Boyer's model of scholarship.
The DNP is a practice-focused doctorate established in the United States, distinct from the research-oriented PhD. Similar professional doctorates in the United Kingdom and Australia share the goal of integrating clinical expertise with scholarly inquiry. Despite the rapid growth of DNP programs and the increasing recognition of applied scholarship, many universities continue to privilege traditional research metrics in academic tenure and promotion. This narrow focus on discovery-based outputs marginalises the contributions of DNP faculty in implementation science, systems leadership, and education.
Discursive position paper.
Analysis of policy reports, faculty promotion guidelines, AACN Essentials, and peer-reviewed literature on doctoral education, professional doctorates, and academic equity, 2000–2025.
Current academic evaluation systems sustain hierarchical norms that undervalue practice-based scholarship. This misalignment restricts the career trajectories of DNP-prepared faculty and constrains nursing's leadership in applied innovation. Reframing scholarly legitimacy through Boyer's model of discovery, integration, application, and teaching enables recognition of diverse expertise without compromising academic rigour.
Fully integrating professional doctorates into academic structures requires deliberate reforms in evaluation frameworks, mentorship programs, and institutional policies. Such changes would advance equity, reflect the realities of modern nursing, and align doctoral education with the evolving needs of healthcare systems.
This paper contributes to the international discourse on the future of doctoral education by offering a practical model for inclusive faculty advancement. It also advocates adopting pluralistic definitions of scholarship to support diverse academic career paths in nursing.
No patients, service users, caregivers, or members of the public were involved in the development of this discursive paper. The analysis synthesises existing scholarship, policy documents, and theoretical frameworks and does not draw on primary data requiring patient or public involvement.
This study examines the relationships between wage satisfaction, union perceptions, expectations, and union membership among Turkish nurses, identifying factors associated with union participation.
Sequential explanatory mixed-methods design.
This two-phase study (January–July 2023) included: (1) a quantitative survey of 210 nurses assessing wage satisfaction, union perceptions, and expectations, analysed using regression and PROCESS Macro (Model 4); and (2) qualitative interviews with 22 nurses, including 15 with union leadership experience, analysed through thematic analysis using MAXQDA.
Quantitative findings indicated that wage satisfaction was associated with nurses' perceptions of unions but did not independently predict union expectations. The study hypothesises that union perception functions as a key mediating mechanism, translating wage dissatisfaction into expectations for union action. Qualitative findings supported this pattern, showing that although wage dissatisfaction was widespread, nurses' expectations were primarily shaped by perceptions of unions' transparency, political independence, democratic participation, and representational capacity rather than by wages alone.
Union participation among nurses is influenced by both economic conditions and normative evaluations of unions. While wage dissatisfaction provides an important contextual background, expectations and engagement are mainly driven by perceptions of union credibility, fairness, and representational effectiveness.
Nursing unions should prioritise transparent governance, democratic participation, and political independence to enhance trust, member engagement, workforce stability, and quality of care.
This study addresses persistent wage dissatisfaction alongside declining union membership and trust. The findings demonstrate that union engagement depends not only on economic dissatisfaction but also on perceived representational fairness. The results are particularly relevant for nursing unions, professional organisations, and policymakers aiming to strengthen union legitimacy and workforce engagement in healthcare systems.
Compliant with COREQ guidelines and mixed-methods reporting standards.
No patient or public contribution.
The international mobility of nurses is a significant component of healthcare systems worldwide, resulting in the global recruitment and adaptation of culturally and linguistically diverse nurses into diverse work environments. CALD nurses face integration challenges, which can potentially compromise their well-being and adjustment to the new setting. Psychological safety is a key component to promoting individual well-being and effective organisational integration.
This systematic review aimed to identify the current evidence on the psychological safety of culturally and linguistically diverse nurses in healthcare work environments and the factors associated with it.
This systematic review was conducted using JBI guidelines. PiCo/PEO format was utilised for inclusion and exclusion criteria, including English/Finnish, without time limitations. The screening process was conducted by two independent researchers, with a third researcher resolving the conflicts. The PRISMA checklist was utilised in reporting. Data were analysed using content analysis for qualitative and data synthesis for quantitative.
CINAHL, PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus and Medic. Search period: 24.10.2024–23.1.2025.
The systematic review yielded 15 qualitative, one mixed-methods and one quantitative article. The content analysis produced 270 codes, 67 subcategories, seven categories and two main categories. Professional growth and acceptance captured inclusion, professional competence and support from colleagues and managers in creating job satisfaction. Marginalised disempowerment reflected factors linked to low psychological safety, contributing to reduced job satisfaction in the workplace.
Healthcare organisations should confront existing inequities on psychological safety in culturally diverse healthcare environments that are structured around professional inequalities to create equitable spaces for CALD nurses. More research is needed to understand psychological safety experiences from the CALD nurse perspective, exploring the equitability of facilitating factors amid systemic disadvantages in the healthcare workplace.
No patient or public involvement.
Prospero registration: CRD42024581860
To systematically synthesise nurses' perspectives on dignified death, providing a culturally informed and comprehensive understanding.
Meta-ethnography.
This study was conducted using Noblit and Hare's approach, which included reciprocal translation, refutational synthesis, and line-of-argument synthesis. Methodological rigour and credibility were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. The review included peer-reviewed qualitative studies published in English or Korean that focused on nurses' or nursing students' views on dignified death in end-of-life care.
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Web of Science in August 2023, with an updated search in August 2024. Seventeen qualitative studies published between 2010 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria.
Four interconnected themes emerged: A death that embraces humanity, a death that preserves personal identity, a death that facilitates connection and reconciliation, and a death that affirms acceptance and spiritual serenity. These themes, including eight sub-themes, highlight cultural influences shaping nurses' approaches to dignified death.
The findings emphasise the influence of cultural context in shaping end-of-life care and support the development of culturally sensitive nursing education and guidelines to enhance care quality.
This research provides culturally grounded strategies to improve end-of-life care and strengthen nurses' competencies in delivering holistic support.
This study highlights cultural variations in nurses' approaches to balancing autonomy, family expectations, and spiritual needs, offering practical insights for holistic, patient-centred, and culturally sensitive care.
This review complies with the Equator and improving reporting of meta-ethnography (eMERGe) guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
FreshRSS 