Health literacy (HL) is essential for making informed health-related decisions, for example enabling parents to reduce their child’s allergy risk. Health literacy does not, however, rely solely on an individual’s capacities, but is strongly influenced by external factors. Midwives provide important health advice to families, particularly since their relationship is close during a time of significant transition. This offers them a unique opportunity to positively influence the HL of parents, which in turn may support the health and well-being of the whole family. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate an intervention that can support midwives in providing allergy prevention advice in a way that is in line with the concept of HL.

In accordance with the recommendations of the Medical Research Council framework in the first phase of this study, we will survey midwives (target sample size=379) in Germany regarding their practices, the potential barriers they face and enabling factors in providing advice on early childhood allergy prevention in an HL-responsive way. The data will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Two co-design workshops will then be conducted with various stakeholders in two regions (Rhineland-Palatinate and Saxony) of Germany. Following the protocol proposed by the Stanford Design Thinking School, we will use design thinking to collect ideas for the intervention. Based on these ideas and our previous qualitative and quantitative study, we will develop an intervention in collaboration with didactic experts. The intervention will be piloted in three groups (midwives=10–15, midwives working as practice supervisors=5–10, students of midwifery=10–20). For the process evaluation, we will use observation protocols of the intervention conduct and qualitative interviews. For the outcome evaluation, we will use a questionnaire and observations in simulation laboratories with students of midwifery.

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (ID 23-3441-101) and is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation in the study will only be possible after informed consent has been given. Our results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in scientific journals. Additionally, once it has been finalised, we will make the intervention available to educational institutions for (future) midwives.

Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers have a 20–46% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) due to mismatch repair gene variants. Mesalamine (5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid), used safely in patients with ulcerative colitis, may reduce CRC risk in LS by decreasing microsatellite instability, a key driver of LS-related cancer. This study evaluates 5-ASA’s efficacy as a tolerable chemopreventive drug, aiming to improve long-term CRC prevention in LS.

This multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, two-arm, phase II clinical study will compare the effects of a 2-year daily intake of 5-ASA (2000 mg) to placebo in LS carriers. The primary objective is to assess whether mesalamine reduces colorectal neoplasia, both benign and malignant, compared with placebo in LS carriers, as detected by colonoscopy at the end of the treatment period (24 months±1 month) and on study completion. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether 5-ASA reduces neoplasia/tumour multiplicity and progression compared with placebo at specified time points, examining variations in the effects of 5-ASA versus placebo based on cancer history, sex and age (

The trial is currently open for enrolment, having received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm and funding from the Swedish Research Council. The study protocol is the finalised V.10.0 (11 April 2024), transitioned to the European Clinical Trials Information System. LS remains underdiagnosed, which may limit recruitment. The results are of global interest and will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04920149. EudraCT: 2019-003011-55. EU CT: 2024-514765-19-01.

TransformUs is a multicomponent school-based programme that offers teachers professional learning and resources aligned with the Australian curriculum to promote physically active teaching and learning, a supportive environment and physical activity opportunities during recess and lunch. The programme was originally developed for students in mainstream primary schools and has been proven efficacious for increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour in children without disability. The programme has been adapted for delivery with students with disabilities in primary and secondary schools (TransformUs All Abilities). This project aims to determine the implementation at scale and effectiveness of the TransformUs All Abilities programme to increase physical activity among primary and secondary school children and adolescents with disability. This protocol describes the hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial that will be used for this evaluation.

This study employs a hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness trial to evaluate the TransformUs All Abilities programme, targeting all government and independent, primary and secondary schools in Victoria, as well as special and mainstream secondary schools in Queensland and South Australia (n=2173 eligible schools). The effectiveness trial will focus on a subgroup of government/independent special schools for students with mild to moderate intellectual disability in Victoria, involving up to three intervention and three waitlist control schools (n=61 eligible schools). In both trials, outcomes will be guided by the RE-AIM framework focusing on reach, adoption and implementation (implementation trial) and effectiveness (effectiveness trial), with data collected at baseline and 6 months. The effectiveness trial will focus on students’ device-measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour—primary outcomes—and sleep, physical literacy and cognitive functions—secondary outcomes. Teacher feedback on the programme’s adaptation and their experience with programme implementation will also be collected, alongside qualitative feedback from a subsample of students regarding engagement/enjoyment and suggestions for improvements. Implementation data will be analysed descriptively and using linear mixed models to test changes over time. Effectiveness outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed models to compare intervention and waitlist control, accounting for confounding and school/classroom clustering. Interview data will be thematically analysed.

Ethical approval for this trial was obtained from the Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021-368). Clearance to conduct research in schools was also obtained from the Education Departments of Victoria (2023-004726), Queensland (550/27/2592) and South Australia (2022-0020). Informed consent is required for participation in the study. School staff can enrol in the implementation trial via the TransformUs website, while the effectiveness trial requires organisational, staff, parental/carer consent and student assent. Results will be disseminated through academic publications, scientific conference presentations and summary reports to schools, parents and partner organisations.

ACTRN12622001082796; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1281-1103; ACTRN12622001050741: U1111-1280-8828.

The aim of this study was to analyse associations between crowded housing and children’s indoor living environment, respiratory and allergic disorders and general health.

A cross-sectional study.

Sweden, using data from the Swedish National Environmental Health Survey 2019.

The study sample included 48 512 children (aged 6–10 months, 4 years and 12 years). We also investigated associations in vulnerable subgroups, such as children with asthma and those living under unfavourable socioeconomic conditions.

Primary outcomes in the living environment were at least one sign of mould, poor indoor air quality, unpleasant odours, too warm indoors in summer and too cold indoors in winter. Primary outcomes for children’s health were asthma, airway problems, breathing difficulties, rhinitis symptoms, mould and mites allergy, pollen allergy, furred pet allergy and good general health.

About one in five children lived in an overcrowded home. Factors from the indoor living environment such as perceived poor indoor air quality and mould were significantly associated with crowded housing. Moreover, children who lived in overcrowded conditions were less likely to report good general health than children in non-crowded households (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.76). This association was even stronger in children with asthma (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77). Few significant associations were, however, observed with the respiratory and allergic health outcomes.

Crowded housing is associated both with a poor indoor environment and with poorer general health in children. Children with asthma may experience even poorer general health.

To evaluate an innovative approach to recruit 40 hospitals to a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to improve discharge antibiotic prescribing.

This study describes the design, implementation and impact of a theory-informed recruitment approach for hospitals participating in the Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics at Discharge (ROAD) Home trial.

An inperson meeting of a quality improvement collaborative of acute care hospitals in the state of Michigan.

Representatives from acute care hospitals that are part of the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

Small group recruitment sessions that combined deliberative participation and credible messengers to recruit hospitals to participate in a cluster RCT on a single date (1 November 2023).

The primary outcome was the number of hospitals which agreed to participate in the trial. We also assessed participant feedback, effectiveness of recruitment methods and resources required for implementation of this approach.

We recruited 51 (74%) of 69 eligible hospitals. Survey participants reported: sessions made clear the purpose of the trial (94%, 64/68) and time commitment required (87%, 59/68); agreed deliberative participation was helpful (82%, 56/68) and were ‘very satisfied’ with the session (82%, 56/68). Investigators largely reported credible messengers were a positive influence, though this varied across sessions. Hospital recruitment was time intensive, taking 179.5 total person hours. The recruitment process involved 3 months of preparation for the sessions and 2 months of follow-up prior to closing recruitment.

We demonstrated the feasibility and impact of a novel approach to recruit hospitals from an existing collaborative to a cluster RCT using the principles of deliberative participation and credible messengers. While the approach was time-consuming, we achieved success at over-recruiting hospitals in a relatively short period of time. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organisers in implementing hospital-based cluster RCTs.

The ROAD Home trial is registered on Clinical.Trials.gov (NCT06106204).

Although as many as 92% of survivors of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) report impacts to the head and/or non-fatal strangulation (NFS) that raise clinical suspicion of brain injury (BI), there are no evidence-based methods to document and characterise BI in this vulnerable population, limited clinical practice guidelines and insufficient understanding about long-term risks for conditions including Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). This leaves most survivors of IPV-caused BI (IPV-BI), overwhelmingly women, without adequate access to medical care and support, safe housing, back-to-school/work accommodations or follow-up care for long-term neurocognitive health. Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established ADRD risk factor, little is known about the attributable risk of ADRD due to IPV-BI, particularly in women.

Our overarching objectives are to (1) use plasma biomarkers as novel tools to assist clinicians to improve diagnosis of IPV-BI at the acute, subacute and chronic stages in a manner sensitive to the needs of this vulnerable population and (2) raise awareness of the importance of considering IPV-BI as a potential ADRD risk factor. A prospective observational study funded by the US Department of Defense (HT9425-24-1-0462), Brain Canada (6200) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (523320-NWT-CAAA-37499) leverages collaborative research at multiple clinical sites in British Columbia to maximise equity, diversity and inclusion among participants, with a target enrolment of n=600 participants.

The Advocates, Academics, Survivors and Clinicians to END Intimate Partner Violence Biomarkers study, which is predicated on pre-specified research questions, represents one of the most significant community-based studies on plasma biomarkers affected by an IPV-BI incident. Of particular significance is the fact our study uses robust biomarker approaches being applied in the TBI and ADRD fields to determine how the biomarker profile after IPV-BI compares to typical TBI and the early stage of neurodegenerative disorders.

This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board (H24-01990, H22-02241 and H16-02792) and the Island Health Research Ethics Board (H22-03510). Upon publication of primary papers, de-identified data and biospecimens will be made widely available, including the US Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) federated database. Our data and integrated knowledge translation activities with persons with lived experience of IPV-BI and those working in the healthcare sector will be synthesised into co-designed and implemented knowledge tools to improve outcomes for survivors of IPV-BI.

Culture underpins social interaction between school health professionals and children. Both practice and research suggest that cultural variations, migration and intercultural interactions pose potential challenges in encounters between school health professionals and children and may relate to the health professionals’ understanding of their own culture as a factor in such encounters. Still, for the school health services (SHS), reviews collating existing research on school health professionals’ understanding of culture are lacking.

This review aims to identify, describe and analyse existing research on school health professionals’ (ie, school nurses, school social workers, school doctors and school psychologists) understanding of culture.

A scoping review of peer-reviewed and published scientific articles on school health professionals’ understanding of culture.

Articles published between 2013 and 2024 on culture, SHS and school nurses, school doctors, school social workers or school psychologists.

Searches were conducted in October 2023 and September 2024 in 10 databases. Two reviewers independently screened the article titles, abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Extracted data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The qualitative content analysis focused on content related to theoretical considerations, key findings and conceptualisations of culture.

From 1784 screened articles, 100 articles were screened in full text and 21 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. After identifying two additional articles through manual searches, a total of 23 articles were included in the review. The findings show that the articles primarily applied a quantitative study design, focused on school psychologists and school nurses and were conducted in the USA and Nordic-Baltic area. Self-understanding was mainly studied using validated instruments, leaving the conceptualisation of culture to the researchers. Still, only about half of all the articles described the theoretical conceptualisation of culture. Studies of intercultural interaction focused on the challenges of encountering ‘diverse’ children and raised concerns about barriers and hindrances to the encounters.

This review shows that SHS professionals’ understanding of culture has mainly been studied within two SHS professions, within a narrow geographical sphere and without a theoretical stance on culture. Thus, more qualitative research, a clearer theoretical conceptualisation of culture and more research on SHS professionals’ practice and self-understanding are needed.

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as stroke prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has increased steadily since the introduction in 2011. In Sweden today, more patients are treated with DOACs than with warfarin. However, it is not shown that an increased proportion of DOAC prescriptions correlates to lower event rates of stroke and systemic embolism.

This study aims to investigate whether the increased prescription of DOACs in Sweden correlates with lower event rates for all-cause stroke, systemic embolism and bleeding complications, using real-life data for the whole NVAF population.

Nationwide retrospective register study.

Data were obtained from the Swedish National Patient Registry, covering patients aged 18 years or older with NVAF, between 1 January 2014, and 31 December 2017. Exposure to oral anticoagulants was determined based on pharmaceutical data, calculating treatment duration by the number of pills dispensed and the prescribed daily usage rate. Baseline characteristics and endpoints were collected from hospital administrative registers using International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) codes.

All patients with NVAF were identified using ICD-10 codes during the study period. Entry criteria included having a first recorded atrial fibrillation diagnosis after 1 January 2014 or being previously diagnosed with atrial fibrillation before 2014 but still receiving care after this date.

The outcomes were event rates (per 100 person-years) of ischaemic stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding (including haemorrhagic stroke). Event rates were calculated and compared across the study period using Cox proportional hazard models.

In the total NVAF population, the proportional decrease in event rates (per 100 treatment years) in 2017 compared with 2014 was ischaemic stroke 24% (1.70–1.30), all-cause mortality 4% (9.40–9.00), all-cause stroke 24% (2.10–1.60) and all-cause stroke and systemic embolism 23% (2.20–1.70). During the same time, the proportion of major bleeding and intracranial bleeding rates, including haemorrhagic stroke, also decreased: 5% (2.00–1.90), 6% (0.68–0.64) and 17% (0.30–0.25), respectively. DOACs use increased from 4.1% to 28.3% in the total population and from 22.7% to 60.9% in newly diagnosed patients.

In the initial years following the introduction when DOAC uptake in the population was high, an increasing proportion of Swedish NVAF patients receiving DOACs was accompanied by lower event rates of all-cause stroke and systemic embolism, ischaemic stroke and all-cause mortality, intracranial bleeding and major bleeding, highlighting the improved risk-benefit balance of DOACs in stroke prophylaxis.