To translate and culturally adapt six self-report measures for depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and somatic symptom disorder into Hindi and determine their diagnostic accuracy against a diagnostic clinical interview.

Cross-sectional validation study.

Rural Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, northern India.

480 perinatal (pregnant or within 12 months postpartum) and non-perinatal (not currently pregnant and not given birth within 12 months) women at one tertiary hospital and district-level Anganwadi (community health) centres.

Symptom endorsement; and discriminant validity, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the Kessler Scale of Psychological Distress (K10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7), Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS), PTSD Checklist (PCL-5) and Scale for the Assessment of Somatic Symptoms (SASS).

Complete data were available for 443 participants. Tiredness and body weakness were the most commonly endorsed symptoms among participants with common mental disorders. Among perinatal participants, the AUROC was highest for the GAD7 (0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96) and SASS (0.84, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96). Among non-perinatal participants, the AUROC was highest for the SASS (0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) and PHQ9 (0.91, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.96).

Measures which assess for fatigue, tiredness and somatic symptoms may help to identify women experiencing common mental disorders in this setting. Small numbers of participants with clinically diagnosed mental disorders in our sample mean results must be interpreted cautiously.

NCT05485701.

To establish consensus definitions for non-visually impairing eye conditions (NVICs) and their methods of assessments to provide standards for use in population-based eye surveys.

A literature review of NVICs in sub-Saharan Africa, a questionnaire of inquiry based on the literature review developed by an expert panel and a modified Delphi exercise with three iterative rounds with eye health experts.

Eye health academia and community eye health in Nigeria.

Nigerian ophthalmologists, including subspecialists experienced in population-based eye health surveys.

Definitions and statements where at least 70% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed.

Forty-two ophthalmologists practising in Nigeria with experience in conducting population-based eye health surveys were invited to take part in the Delphi exercise. There were three rounds with response rates of 39/42 (92.9%) in round 1, (94.9%) in round 2 and 100% in round 3. Consensus for NVICs to be included in population-based eye surveys, their definitions and methods for assessment was reached by the third round.

We propose case definitions for NVICs to be assessed in population-based eye surveys through a modified Delphi approach with an expert panel of ophthalmologists from across Nigeria. These case definitions will allow for standardisation of NVICs in population-based eye surveys to assess the prevalence and magnitude of the different types of NVICs for planning purposes. Further studies are needed to validate these case definitions and inform their evolution.

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Current management relies on umbilical artery Doppler patterns in the smaller twin. These patterns are, however, inconsistent and do not represent a reliable severity scale, complicating clinical decision-making and parental counselling. This study aims to improve risk stratification by identifying predictors of adverse outcomes, while also evaluating the pathophysiology and multi-organ impact of sFGR in early childhood.

This is a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study conducted in six tertiary fetal medicine centres with expertise in complicated twin pregnancies. Recruitment began in March 2023 and will continue until December 2026, targeting 274 MCDA twin pairs with complete follow-up to develop a prediction model for adverse perinatal outcomes in sFGR at the time of diagnosis. Standardised data collection includes serial ultrasound examinations, advanced fetal imaging (cardiac, cerebral and 3D volumetric), fetal brain MRI and detailed placental phenotyping. Maternal and parental well-being are assessed during pregnancy and after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome is evaluated up to 2 years after birth using validated tools. The statistical analysis plan includes predictive modelling with internal validation.

The study has been approved by the ethical review boards of all participating centres. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and engagement with clinical guideline committees.

NCT05952583.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a high recurrence rate after curative surgery, with no standard neoadjuvant therapy. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown efficacy in locally advanced ICC, while immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents have demonstrated promising response rates. The NEO-ERA-01 study evaluates the feasibility of neoadjuvant HAIC-GEMOX plus lenvatinib and Adebrelimab in high-risk resectable ICC.

NEO-ERA-01 is a prospective, multicentre, phase II trial using Simon’s two-stage design. Thirty patients with histologically confirmed resectable ICC and high-risk recurrence factors will be enrolled in China. Neoadjuvant therapy consists of HAIC-GEMOX (gemcitabine 800 mg/m², oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² every 3 weeks), lenvatinib (8 mg/day from Day 5) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 3, every 3 weeks) for 2–4 cycles. Surgery eligibility will be assessed post-treatment. Resected patients will receive adjuvant capecitabine (1250 mg/m² two times per day on Days 1–14, every 3 weeks) and Adebrelimab (1200 mg on Day 1, every 3 weeks) for 6 months.

The primary endpoint is the completion rate of study treatment. Secondary endpoints include safety, R0 resection rate, response rate, event-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include immune microenvironment and biomarker analysis.

The study is approved by the ethics committee of all sites and follows the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

NCT06208462.

The second phase of the Chiba Study of Mother and Child Health (C-MACH) was initiated to investigate how environmental exposures from the fetal period to early childhood influence maternal and child health outcomes. The sub-cohort focuses specifically on detailed assessments of indoor environmental factors and neighbourhood-built and social environments. By integrating environmental metrics with biological, behavioural and sociodemographic data, the study aims to elucidate their role in the development of allergies, neurodevelopmental disorders and other non-communicable diseases in early life.

Between June 2021 and April 2023, 505 pregnant women were enrolled in the second phase of the C-MACH main study. Of these, 298 participants consented to join the sub-cohort study, including 258 in the sleep and physical activity monitoring option (Option 1) and 148 in the indoor allergen exposure sub-study (Option 2). The study includes biological sampling, environmental monitoring and repeated questionnaire surveys. At baseline, 253 live births were recorded from 251 pregnancies.

Of the 298 women, 272 completed early pregnancy questionnaires. The mean maternal age was 33.1 years (SD 4.6); 97.8% were married. University-level education was reported by 51.0% of mothers and 53.7% of fathers. Most households had an annual income of 6 to

Longitudinal follow-up will continue until the children reach age 15. Future analyses will examine associations between environmental exposures and allergic, developmental, endocrine/metabolic and obesity-related outcomes.

Accurate arterial pressure monitoring is critical in cardiac surgery to guide haemodynamic management and vasopressor therapy. Radial arterial pressure monitoring may systematically underestimate central aortic pressure compared with femoral monitoring, potentially leading to inappropriate vasopressor escalation and associated complications. Recent evidence demonstrates that excessive norepinephrine exposure is associated with acute kidney injury and increased mortality in cardiac surgery patients.

To determine whether femoral arterial pressure monitoring reduces norepinephrine use compared with radial monitoring in cardiac surgery patients.

This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, superiority trial conducted at two French university hospitals (CHU Besancon and CHU Dijon). Adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be randomised 1:1 to receive either femoral or radial arterial pressure monitoring. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients treated with norepinephrine from anaesthetic induction to postoperative day 7. Secondary endpoints include acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria, cardiac complications, vasoactive-inotropic scores, duration of vasopressor therapy, vascular complications, and 7-day and 30-day mortality. Sample size calculation indicates 340 patients (170 per group) are needed to detect a 15% absolute reduction in norepinephrine use with 90% power and α=0.05, and an anticipated loss to follow-up rate of 5%.

The study has been approved by the French Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest II, no. 2024/897) and will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

NCT06952907.

Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.

A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.

Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.

A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4–6 months after amputation. A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.

Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients’ limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals’ perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons’ paternalism and (v) patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.

Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences. Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation. Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.

NCT04903756.

Effect size and event rate estimation is necessary for sample size calculation in randomised clinical trials. Overestimation of the effect size and event rate can lead to inadequately powered studies and increased probability of false negative results. This is common in trials involving critically ill patients. However, such overestimation has not been systematically evaluated in trials involving neurocritical care. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of published randomised clinical trials involving critically ill neurological patients, to determine the accuracy of effect size and event rate estimation.

We will review randomised clinical trials involving adult critically ill neurological patients that were published from 2015 onwards in selected clinically useful and high-impact journals. We will include randomised clinical trials reporting a binary or time to event outcome, using two study groups, and a superiority design testing the efficacy of diagnostic, monitoring, therapeutic or process interventions. All eligible studies must report an estimated event rate in the control group and estimated effect size. All relevant studies will be identified through database searches. All study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. We will use a random-effects model for pooling data. This review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Accuracy of effect size and event rate estimation will be evaluated by comparing the estimated and observed values. The association between the accuracy of the individual randomised clinical trial effect size and event rate estimation and rejection of the null hypothesis will be evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Multivariable linear regression analysis will be used to explore the factors associated with accuracy of effect size and event rate estimation. In addition, we will perform subgroup analysis by impact factor of the published journals, sample size of the studies and risk of bias.

As this systematic review will use data from previously published studies, it does not require ethics approval. Findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at specialty-based conferences. The study will be included in the higher degree research thesis of the primary author.

CRD420251106394.

To investigate vaccination coverage for influenza and COVID-19 in the SARS-CoV-2 immunity and reinfection evaluation (SIREN) study cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) between 2020 and 2023 and explore vaccination enablers and barriers.

A mixed-methods study nested within SIREN, a multicentre prospective cohort study of HCWs across the UK. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used sequentially, using an expansion/explanation function, enabling emergent themes observed from the quantitative stage to be explored in the qualitative stage.

SIREN sites include secondary care centres and community mental health trusts in the UK.

Quantitative analysis was conducted on data from 6048 participants. Participants were representative of the HCW workforce, with the majority being women (83%) and of white ethnicity (88%). Nurses made up the largest occupational group (33%). Qualitative analysis of data from 24 participants including five focus groups (n=21) and three semistructured interviews (n=3); 82% women, 26% minority ethnic, all working age from across the UK.

Quantitative: vaccine coverage for COVID-19 and influenza vaccines by demographic with multivariable logistical regression used to assess differences. Qualitative: thematic analysis to explore reasons behind the results seen in the quantitative stage.

COVID-19 vaccination was initially high; 97% received two doses and 94% a first booster. However, coverage was reduced to 77%, for the second booster. Influenza vaccination coverage was lowest in 2020–2021 (46%), increasing to 73% in 2021–2022 and to 79% in 2022–2023. In 2022–2023, vaccination coverage was higher for influenza than for COVID-19. High vaccine coverage for both COVID-19 and influenza was observed in doctors, pharmacists and therapists. Porters, healthcare assistants and staff from minority ethnic groups had lower vaccine coverage for both COVID-19 and influenza. Four themes were identified: (1) attitudes towards vaccination changed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) HCWs used data to inform vaccination decisions; (3) poor communication in healthcare settings contributed to a reduction in vaccination; (4) there were both positive and negative impacts of the COVID-19 vaccine on influenza vaccine uptake and other vaccination programmes.

Between 2020 and 2023 in our cohort, COVID-19 vaccination coverage decreased, whereas influenza increased. Our study found attitudes to both vaccines have shifted, becoming more favourable to influenza and less to COVID-19 boosters. Barriers to COVID-19 boosters, including concerns about side effects and vaccine effectiveness, need to be addressed with improved communication on the benefits and adverse events. Future vaccination strategies should address the differences we have identified in vaccine coverage across demographics and occupational groups, including continued efforts to improve vaccine equity.

ISRCTN11041050.

Countries face challenges in maternal and newborn care (MNC) regarding costs, workforce and sustainability. Organising integrated care is increasingly seen as a way to address these challenges. The evidence on the optimal organisation of integrated MNC in order to improve outcomes is limited.

(1) To study associations between organisational elements of integrated care and maternal and neonatal health outcomes, experiences of women and professionals, healthcare costs and care processes and (2) to examine how the different dimensions of integrated care, as defined by the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care, are reflected in the literature addressing these organisational elements.

We included 288 papers and identified 23 organisational elements, grouped into 6 categories: personal continuity of care; interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration and coordination; care by a midwife; alternative payment models (non-fee-for-service); place of birth outside the obstetric unit and woman-centred care. Personal continuity, care by a midwife and births outside obstetric units were most consistently associated with improved maternal and newborn outcomes, positive experiences for women and professionals and potential cost savings, particularly where well-coordinated multidisciplinary care was established. Positive professional experiences of collaboration depended on clear roles, mutual trust and respectful interdisciplinary behaviour. Evidence on collaboration interventions and alternative payment models was inconclusive. Most studies emphasised clinical and professional aspects rather than organisational integration, with implementation barriers linked to prevailing biomedical system orientations.

Although the literature provides substantial evidence of organisational elements that contribute to improved outcomes, a significant gap remains in understanding how to overcome the barriers in sustainable implementation of these elements within healthcare systems. Interpreted through a systems and transition science lens, these findings suggest that strengthening integrated maternity care requires system-level changes aligning with WHO policy directions towards midwifery models of person-centred care.

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition in older adults, with a recurrence rate of approximately 7.1–13% after burr-hole drainage. Although surgical adjuncts such as subdural drains and middle meningeal artery embolisation may reduce recurrence, these are not suitable for all patients. Pharmacological strategies, including tranexamic acid, Goreisan and carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate, have shown potential, but high-level evidence remains lacking. A prior retrospective study suggested that a triple oral regimen combining these agents may reduce recurrence. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

This is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted across six hospitals in Ibaraki, Japan. A total of 180 patients undergoing first-time burr-hole surgery for CSDH will be randomised 1:1 to receive either triple therapy (Goreisan 7.5 g/day, carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate 90 mg/day and tranexamic acid 750 mg/day for up to 90 days) or standard postoperative care. The primary outcome is recurrence requiring reoperation within 90 days. Secondary outcomes include time to recurrence and haematoma volume reduction on serial CT imaging. All analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models and mixed-effects models.

Written, informed consent will be obtained from all participants at each participating hospital by trained staff from that hospital. The trial protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tsukuba Hospital (approval no. TCRB23-025) and the Institutional Review Boards of all participating centres. Study findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals. A summary of the results will also be provided to participating institutions and made publicly available in accordance with the BMJ Open data sharing policy.

jRCTs031240007.

Phasix mesh is a fully resorbable synthetic mesh for use in clean and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repairs. Long-term absorbable Phasix mesh appears to be a safe and promising device in incisional hernia repair, with low recurrence rates; however, data on long-term complications after surgery, particularly after the resorption period of the mesh, are scarce.

This protocol describes a study of several European registries on the use of a Phasix mesh in incisional hernia repair. The primary endpoint of the study is long-term complications at 2–5 year follow-up after mesh implantation, with secondary endpoints including hernia recurrence and complications during short-term follow-up.

Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as the study is based on anonymised registry data collected with prior patient consent in each registry. Each participating registry has its own ethical approval process, and this study will adhere to those regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.

People experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD: homelessness, substance use and criminal offending) have multiple intersecting unmet health and social care needs and high mortality rates, often due to street-drug overdose. Pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs) suggest an integrated, holistic, collaborative outreach intervention (Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent Prescribing Rx (PHOENIx)) involving generalist-trained pharmacists, nurses or General Practitioners accompanied by staff from third sector homeless organisations may improve outcomes, including reducing overdose.

Multicentre, parallel group, prospective RCT with parallel economic and process evaluation. Set in six areas of Scotland, UK, 378 adults with SMD will be recruited and randomised (stratified by setting and previous non-fatal overdoses) to PHOENIx intervention in addition to usual care (UC) or UC. Aiming to meet participants weekly for 9–15 months, PHOENIx teams assess and address health and social care needs while referring onwards as necessary, co-ordinating care with wider health and third sector teams. During a person-centred consultation, in the participants’ choice of venue, and taking account of the participant’s priorities, the NHS clinician may prescribe, de-prescribe and treat, for example, wound care, and refer to other health services as necessary. The third sector worker may help with welfare benefit applications, social prescribing or advocacy, for example, securing stable housing. Pairings of clinicians and third sector workers support the same participants. The primary outcome is time to first fatal/non-fatal street-drug overdose at nine months. Secondary endpoints include health-related quality of life, healthcare use and criminal justice encounters. A health economic evaluation will assess cost per quality adjusted life year of PHOENIx relative to standard care. A parallel qualitative process evaluation will explore the perceptions and experiences of PHOENIx, by participants, stakeholders and PHOENIx staff.

The primary and other time-to-event secondary outcomes will be analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

IRAS number 345246, approved 23/10/2024 by North of Scotland Research Ethics Service. Results will be shared with participants, third sector homelessness organisations, health and social care partnerships, then peer-reviewed journals and conferences worldwide, from the first quarter of 2027.

ISRCTN12234059 registered on 20/2/2025 (ISRCTN).