Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common autoimmune illness that causes inflammation, demyelination and neurological damage. Symptom relief and immunotherapy are part of the treatment, but several healthcare barriers significantly influence outcomes and quality of life.

This study aimed to assess different aspects among patients with MS, such as their knowledge of the disease, access to care, medications’ beliefs and depression, and to evaluate any correlations between these variables and their impact on the presence of depression.

A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2024 to October 2024 at Al-Basheer Hospital, King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Princess Basma Teaching Hospital and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Amman. 200 participants were recruited after confirming consent. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using validated instruments, covering sociodemographics, beliefs about medicines, knowledge about MS, access to care and levels of depression.

This study involved 200 patients with MS with a median age of 36 years, mostly women (70.5%), non-smokers (65%) and insured (77.5%). The majority had high education (58%) but low income (67%), with a mean duration of MS disease of 7.8 years after diagnosis. The majority (79.5%) were unaware of their MS type. Beliefs about medications varied, with 22% accepting, 48.5% ambivalent, 14.5% sceptical and 15% indifferent. Disease knowledge was high, with patients recognising MS as an immune, non-contagious and non-curable disease that affects women more than men. Despite good access to care, a percentage of patients needed to travel long distances for care. Depression affected 58% of participants, and it was influenced by access to care, concerning beliefs, income and education. Other variables such as gender, health insurance, the duration of the disease and the necessity of medications had no significant influence.

In conclusion, patients with MS deal with various challenges, such as difficulties in accessing care, associated with psychological factors such as depression. Addressing these barriers by optimising patients' beliefs about medications, enhancing access to care and focusing on the level of knowledge of the disease is crucial for ensuring better and optimal treatment outcomes, as well as decreasing the risk of depression development.

Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is established as the primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, some individuals with LDL-C within desirable limits still develop coronary artery disease (CAD). Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as a genetically determined independent risk factor for CVD. This study aims to investigate Lp(a) by determining its association with coronary artery stenosis severity, identifying its ethnic-specific genetic determinants and assessing its relationship with an energy-dense dietary pattern.

The PUTRA-CV study is a 3-year, multicentre, case-control observational study involving adult patients who have undergone coronary angiography. The primary outcome is the association between Lp(a) levels and the severity of angiographic CAD (assessed by Gensini or Syntax score). Secondary outcomes include the frequencies of Lp(a)-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs10455872 and rs3798220) and the association between dietary patterns and Lp(a) levels. Lp(a) will be measured using a particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method, and SNPs will be genotyped using high-resolution melting. Dietary intake will be assessed using a validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Data will be analysed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise population characteristics. Bivariate analyses will use chi-square (2), independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. The independent association between Lp(a) and coronary artery stenosis severity will be determined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for confounders. Empirically driven dietary patterns will be derived using reduced rank regression, and their association with Lp(a) will be assessed. For genetic analysis, allele frequencies of the LPA SNPs rs10455872 and rs3798220 will be calculated and compared between cases and controls.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the ethics committees of the Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR ID-24-00877-2ID-IIR), Universiti Putra Malaysia (JKEUPM-2024–246), Universiti Teknologi MARA (REC/07/2024-OT/FB/2) and Universiti Malaya Medical Centre (MREC ID NO: 2 02 453–13692). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

This study aimed to determine the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) medication use and glycaemic control.

This was a retrospective diabetes registry-based cohort study.

Singapore.

Patients aged 18 and above with incident DM in the SingHealth Diabetes Registry from 2013 to 2020 were included. The entire study period included a 1 year baseline period, a 1 year observation period and a 3 month outcome period.

Drug use was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC), and the changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between the outcome and baseline periods were assessed. The associations between baseline HbA1c and PDC ≥0.80 and between PDC and change in HbA1c were analysed using logistic regression and the Kruskal–Wallis test, respectively.

Of 184 646 unique patients in the registry from 2013 to 2020, 36 314 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The median PDC for any DM drug, oral DM drugs and insulin during the observation period was 20.3%, 16.8% and 0%, respectively. Those who had good glycaemic control at baseline were less likely to receive DM drugs and those with poor baseline glycaemic control or missing baseline HbA1c were more likely to be consistent users (PDC >80%) (px 10^-16).

The relationship between DM drug use and glycaemic control is complex and non-monotonic. Higher PDC for any DM drug and oral DM drugs during the observation period was significantly associated with clinically relevant HbA1c improvements.

The study aims to assess the magnitude of acute gastroenteritis and associated factors among under-five children visiting public hospitals in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was used to carry out the study. We then employed a systematic random sampling technique through face-to-face interviews to gather the data. A structured questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic, behavioural, environmental and clinical factors was developed after reviewing relevant literature.

The study was conducted in public hospitals located in Jigjiga City, Somali Region, Ethiopia.

A total of 353 under-five children visiting public hospitals were involved in the study.

The primary outcome of the study was the prevalence of acute gastroenteritis.

The 2-week prevalence of acute gastroenteritis among under-five children was 24.6% (95% CI 23.4% to 25.9%). The study found strong links between acute gastroenteritis and having a household greater than five (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.94, 95% CI 1.55 to 5.60), an unprotected source of drinking water (AOR=2.74, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.82), unimproved latrine facilities (AOR=3.15, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.78), the presence of faeces around the latrine (AOR=3.53, 95% CI 1.77 to 7.03) and mothers or caregivers’ history of diarrhoea over the past 2 weeks (AOR=6.23, 95% CI 3.22 to 12.06).

The overall prevalence of acute gastroenteritis in Jigjiga City was relatively high in the 2-week period. Having a household greater than five, an unprotected source of drinking water and unimproved latrine facilities was a significant predictor of acute gastroenteritis. Additionally, the presence of faeces around the latrines and the history of diarrhoea in mothers or caregivers over the past 2 weeks were strongly linked to acute gastroenteritis.

The goal of the study was to determine the magnitude and contributing factors of low back pain among primary school teachers in Borama Town, Somaliland.

An institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study design was employed. Simple random sampling was used to select the study units from each school.

The study was conducted in Borama, Somaliland.

A total of 268 primary school teachers participated in the study.

The primary outcome of the study was the prevalence of low back pain.

The study found that 51.5% of school teachers had low back pain. There was a strong link between low back pain and having a higher Body Mass Index (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.63) and stress at work (AOR=3.34). Sleep disturbance (AOR=1.73), lifting heavy materials (AOR=1.67) and a history of low back injury (AOR=2.12) were also significant predictors of low back pain.

More than half of primary school teachers had low back pain over the past 12 months. Higher Body Mass Index, history of low back injury, stress at work, lifting heavy material and sleep disturbance were significant and independent predictors of low back pain among primary school teachers.

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a group of conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), masticatory muscles and associated structures, often leading to pain, dysfunction and a significant impact on quality of life. Epidemiological studies have estimated that up to 75% of the population in the USA exhibits at least one sign of TMD. Although conservative treatments, such as acupuncture and occlusal splints, have been recommended, evidence for their effectiveness remains inconclusive, and the combined effects of these interventions are not well understood.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an intraoral balance appliance (IBA) combined with standard Korean medicine care, compared to Korean medicine care alone, in patients with chronic, painful TMD with myalgia.

A single-centre, two-arm, parallel, practitioner-blinded and evaluator-blinded, randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be designed to test the interventions. 76 patients with TMD with myalgia will be recruited and randomised. The interventions will include manual acupuncture and physical therapy for both groups, with the addition of IBA in the treatment group for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes of the study will be the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and discomfort at the final visit at week 4. Secondary outcomes will include overall functional assessment of the TMJ using several scales, as well as evaluations of quality of life, patient satisfaction and AEs.

The recruitment started on 18 July 2024, and 37 patients were included as of 8 July 2025.

Ethical approval is obtained from the Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB number: KOMCIRB 2023-06-001). The result from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.

The protocol was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea, on 30 October 2023, CRiS number KCT0008906 prior to the initiation of the study, and was revised on 7 July 2025 (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=30270&search_page=M&search_lang=&class_yn=).

For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), surgical resection remains the sole treatment modality that can potentially result in cure. Unfortunately, the majority of patients present with unresectable tumours or are excluded from surgical treatment due to complications like cholangitis affecting their performance status. In the Netherlands, recommended first-line treatment for patients with unresectable pCCA is palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. This regimen yields an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 11.7–15.2 months, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options. The STRONG I trial, a phase I study in patients with unresectable pCCA, was completed in 2020. Its aim was to assess the feasibility and toxicity profile of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to chemotherapy. SBRT, delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0 Gray (Gy), was considered to be feasible and safe, with no dose-limiting toxicity being observed. The 1-year local tumour control rate was 80% and the 1-year OS rate 100%, with maintenance of quality of life (QoL). These results encouraged us to initiate the STRONG II trial, aiming to investigate the efficacy of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in a larger patient cohort.

STRONG II is a single-arm, multicentre phase II study. Patients with non-metastatic unresectable pCCA (T1-4, N0-2) are eligible. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled in six academic centres in the Netherlands and two in Belgium. SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0–4.5 Gy. The primary endpoint is local tumour control, defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) V.1.1. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, biliary stent-related events, progression-free survival, OS and QoL using the EuroQoL five-dimensional, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Biliary Module (QLQ-BIL21). In addition, we will explore the predictive value of the peripheral immunological status (immune-related proteins and serum functional immunological status assay) and its dynamics in determining survival outcomes. For this explorative translational study, two blood samples will be collected, one before the start of chemotherapy and another after completing chemotherapy.

Approval of the study was obtained on 5 June 2024 by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (ID: NL86210.078.24). The anticipated time frame for patient enrolment is July 2024 to December 2027. The main study findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals, and presented at national and international conferences.

NCT06493734 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

This study aims to assess the level of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and its associated determinants among hypertensive patients in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia using the WHO 10-year CVD risk score.

An institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed.

Hypertensive patients aged 40–74 years in two public hospitals in Jigjiga, Somali Region, Ethiopia, from 20 December 2023 to 20 February 2024.

Randomly selected 344 hypertensive patients aged 40–74 years with a duration of 1 year or more from the time of diagnosis and at least having 6-month follow-up.

10-year CVD risk level was assessed by using WHO 10-year CVD risk score. Risk levels were categorised as low (

Associated factors influencing CVD risk.

The study included 341 hypertensive individuals, with a 99.1% response rate. Of the respondents, 58.9% were men. The overall prevalence of CVD risk within the coming 10 years was 134 (39.3%; 95% CI: 34.1% to 44.5%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age, khat chewing, smoking and comorbid conditions as significant independent predictors of CVD risk. Specifically, individuals aged 60–69 years had an adjusted OR (AOR) of 3.97 (95% CI: 1.94 to 8.16) and those aged 70–74 years had an AOR of 2.99 (95% CI: 1.57 to 5.71). Khat chewers had an AOR of 2.58 (95% CI: 1.22 to 5.46), smokers an AOR of 3.44 (95% CI: 1.59 to 7.48) and individuals with comorbidities an AOR of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.47 to 3.99).

There is a significant increase in 10-year CVD risk among hypertensive patients in the study area. Age, khat chewing, smoking and comorbidities were independent predictors. Regular CVD risk screening for older patients, focused health education to reduce khat and tobacco use and integrated management of comorbidities are essential to lower future cardiovascular risk.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Despite the organised CRC screening programme, the uptake rate of the population-based CRC screening was still low. Thus, we will conduct a randomised controlled trial in a community setting to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based chatbot in promoting CRC screening uptake.

A total of 500 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to a WhatsApp Messenger-initiated chatbot outreach group or a standard text reminder group at a ratio of 1:1. The intervention group will deliver Chinese culturally tailored education texts and videos developed based on the Health Belief Model and the Trans-Theoretical Model. The control group will deliver a standard text reminder of information about the Hong Kong organised CRC screening programme. In addition to the baseline assessment and postintervention assessment, all subjects will be followed up for 3 months and 6 months, respectively. The primary outcome will be the CRC screening uptake rate at the 3 month and 6 month follow-up. The secondary outcomes will be the intention to undergo CRC screening uptake, time interval to participate in and complete screening after recruitment, and reasons for not participating in screening at the 3 month and 6 month follow-up. Quantitative data will be analysed using Student’s t-test, Pearson’s ² test or Fisher’s exact test. Qualitative data will be analysed by thematic analysis.

Ethical approval of this trial was granted by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2022.614). Written informed consent will be obtained from study participants before enrolment. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.

The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06192862).

Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a non-pharmacological intervention aimed at enhancing cognitive function. However, the effectiveness of CS in individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CS in improving cognitive function, psychological well-being, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and quality of life (QoL) in individuals with MCI, based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Six English databases were systematically searched, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, American Psychological Association PsycInfo and Academic Search Premier.

RCTs about CS for individuals with MCI, published between January 2003 and December 2024.

Data were extracted and assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials by independent researchers. The meta-analysis was conducted using the standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs of the included studies.

The meta-analysis included five eligible studies for the primary outcomes of cognitive function and three eligible studies for the secondary outcomes of psychological wellness. In the pooled samples, the CS intervention had a significant effect on cognitive function (SMD=0.63, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.01; p=0.001) and depression symptoms (SMD=–0.29, 95% CI –0.55 to –0.03; p=0.03) in individuals with MCI. However, no significant improvements in anxiety symptoms were identified after the CS intervention (SMD=–0.05; 95% CI –0.31 to 0.21; p=0.71).

The CS intervention can effectively improve cognitive function and alleviate depression symptoms. Although a meta-analysis was not conducted for IADL and QoL due to the limited number of included studies, positive trends in enhancing IADL performance and augmenting QoL were observed in individuals with MCI. However, due to the scarcity of relevant studies in this research field, more comprehensive RCTs are warranted to provide a better understanding of the potential benefits of CS and to guide its clinical application in the future.

CRD42023494685.

Healthcare professionals must possess statistical literacy to provide evidence-based care and engage patients in decision-making. However, there have been concerns about healthcare professionals' inadequate understanding of health statistics. As an initial step in addressing the issue, we assessed the statistical literacy of medical students and doctors in South Korea by evaluating their comprehension of four statistical concepts: (a) single-event probability, (b) relative risk reduction, (c) positive predictive value and (d) 5-year survival rate.

Cross-sectional survey study.

The survey was conducted from October 2018 to January 2019 in one medical school and its affiliated teaching hospital in Seoul, South Korea.

303 medical students from all six grades and 291 doctors from various specialties.

The primary outcome measure was the correct answer rate for each question. The secondary outcome measure was the mean number of correct answers across the four statistical literacy questions, calculated for each individual.

The correct answer rates for basic numeracy questions were close to 100%. Regarding statistical literacy, 95.5% and 83.2% of the participants accurately understood single-event probability and relative risk reduction, respectively. However, only 49.3% and 49.2% of the participants accurately understood the positive predictive value and 5-year survival rate, respectively. The correct answer rates for the question about the 5-year survival rate differed significantly between students (40.9%) and doctors (57.7%) (p

Medical students and doctors have weaker statistical literacy than their basic numeracy. Therefore, it is essential to implement medical education and professional development programmes that focus on improving their statistical literacy. These programmes should specifically address measures of medical test accuracy and the distinction between a 5-year survival rate and mortality.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the significance of mathematical modelling in decision-making and the limited capacity in many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thus, we studied how modelling supported policy decision-making processes in LMICs during the pandemic (details in a separate paper).

We found that strong researcher–policymaker relationships and co-creation facilitated knowledge translation, while scepticism, political pressures and demand for quick outputs were barriers. We also noted that routine use of modelled evidence for decision-making requires sustained funding, capacity building for policy-facing modelling, robust data infrastructure and dedicated knowledge translation mechanisms.

These lessons helped us co-create a framework and policy roadmap for improving the routine use of modelling evidence in public health decision-making. This communication paper describes the framework components and provides an implementation approach and evidence for the recommendations. The components include (1) funding, (2) capacity building, (3) data infrastructure, (4) knowledge translation platforms and (5) a culture of evidence use.

Our framework integrates the supply (modellers) and demand (policymakers) sides and contextual factors that enable change. It is designed to be generic and disease-agnostic for any policy decision-making that modelling could support. It is not a decision-making tool but a guiding framework to help build capacity for evidence-based policy decision-making. The target audience is modellers and policymakers, but it could include other partners and implementers in public health decision-making.

The framework was created through engagements with policymakers and researchers and reflects their real-life experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its purpose is to guide stakeholders, especially in lower-resourced settings, in building modelling capacity, prioritising efforts and creating an enabling environment for using models as part of the evidence base to inform public health decision-making. To validate its robustness and impact, further work is needed to implement and evaluate this framework in diverse settings.