Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with symptomatic PAD often require endovascular revascularisation to relieve pain or salvage limbs. However, the iodinated intra-arterial contrast routinely used in these procedures is nephrotoxic, placing patients with CKD at increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term renal decline. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) delivered via automated injection is a potential alternative imaging contrast medium. This trial will evaluate whether using CO₂ instead of iodinated contrast reduces the risk of AKI and short-term renal function decline in this high-risk group.

This is a multicentre, open-label, prospective randomised controlled trial across six secondary-care National Health Service (NHS) vascular surgery centres. A total of 174 patients with PAD and CKD undergoing endovascular intervention will be randomised 1:1 to receive iodinated contrast (standard of care) or CO₂ via automated injector (Angiodroid). All perioperative care will follow local NHS protocols.

The primary outcome is log serum creatinine at 2, 30 and 90 days postprocedure. Key secondary outcomes include: incidence and severity of AKI within 48 hours postprocedure, major adverse kidney events (death, dialysis or >25% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline) by 90 days, inpatient length of stay, procedural pain, quality of life, procedural success, reinterventions, acceptability and feasibility (patient/practitioner questionnaires) of using CO₂, and cost-effectiveness (healthcare resource use analysis). A mixed-methods process evaluation will be undertaken with patients and clinicians.

The trial has been approved by an NHS ethical review committee (24/WA/0332) and patients have been involved in trial design. Findings will be disseminated to participants, clinicians and the wider public through patient groups, lay summaries, social media, conferences, peer-reviewed journals and NHS policy channels.

ISRCTN23564393.

Harms due to methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD) are rising globally. Untreated withdrawal symptoms perpetuate the cycle of dependence and are a barrier to treatment. There is no pharmacotherapy approved for methamphetamine withdrawal. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) dimesylate has potential as an agonist therapy to ameliorate symptom severity during acute methamphetamine withdrawal and increase duration of initial abstinence and retention in treatment.

We will conduct a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of LDX in reducing symptom severity during acute methamphetamine (MA) withdrawal. One hundred eighty-four adults with moderate to severe MAUD presenting to a health service requesting MA withdrawal treatment who report use of MA within the last 72 hours will be recruited. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive a tapering dose of lisdexamfetamine (250 mg on day 1, reducing by 50 mg per day to 50 mg on day 5, followed by 2 days of placebo washout on days 6 and 7), or placebo for 7 days. The study will be conducted over 7 days in an inpatient unit, and all participants will also receive standard inpatient withdrawal care. Participants will be followed up in the community to day 84. The primary outcome is efficacy, defined as the between-group difference in average withdrawal severity measured over the 7-day admission by the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are retention in treatment, treatment satisfaction, sleep and concomitant medication use (symptomatic medications and medications for other indications to day 7); safety, craving for MA, post-treatment withdrawal symptoms, depression, anxiety and stress, insomnia and cost effectiveness (to day 28) and MA use, mental, physical and social health and post-withdrawal treatment utilisation (to day 84). A First Nations qualitative substudy will assess the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants, ensuring the treatment meets the needs of First Nations people.

This protocol was first approved by the St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 15/05/2024 (2024/ETH00788). All participants will be provided with a participant information sheet and consent form, be fully informed about the study and given ample time to consider participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Findings will be presented such that individual participants will not be identifiable.

ACTRN12624001061527.

Many patients who are extubated after receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure experience extubation failure (ie, require reintubation hours to days after extubation). High-quality evidence shows that extubating patients directly to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), rather than conventional low-flow oxygen, can prevent extubation failure. These guideline-recommended interventions, however, require care coordination involving multiple intensive care unit (ICU) team members and are infrequently used. Interprofessional education (IPE), which teaches members of multiple professions together, could effectively address this implementation gap in complex, team-based, critical care settings, particularly when paired with a customisable protocol.

This batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial will test three hypotheses: (1) when compared with traditional online education (OE), IPE increases implementation of preventive postextubation respiratory support, (2) the benefits of IPE are increased when paired with a clinical protocol and (3) preventive postextubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive postextubation HFNC for low-risk patients reduce in-hospital mortality when compared with conventional postextubation oxygen therapy. The trial will recruit 24 clusters made up of one or more ICUs that care for at least 100 mechanically ventilated patients per year in a large multihospital health system in the USA. All clusters will receive OE, IPE and a clinical protocol, with timing determined by randomisation. We will also randomise half of the clusters to education promoting postextubation NIV for patients at high risk of extubation failure and preventive, postextubation HFNC for patients at lower risk, whereas the other half will be randomised to education promoting postextubation HFNC for all eligible patients. We will include all patients who are invasively mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. The primary implementation endpoint is the rate of use of postextubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants. The primary clinical endpoint is in-hospital mortality truncated at 60 days from intubation.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh and an independent data safety monitoring board. We describe the methods herein using the Standard Protocol Items for Randomised Trials framework and discuss key design decisions. We will disseminate results to participating healthcare providers, through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and via presentations at international conferences.

NCT05523479.

To develop, evaluate and validate the musculoskeletal health climate questionnaire (MHCQ), a multidimensional questionnaire for measuring musculoskeletal health climate.

Cross-sectional test–retest study including systematic scale development and psychometric validation.

The questionnaire was developed following the best practice recommendations for scale development outlined by Boateng et al (2017), including item development, scale development and scale evaluation with input from experts, stakeholders and the target population. Validation was conducted among employees in three physically demanding occupations in Denmark (care workers, slaughterhouse workers and residential painters), where a total of 1420 participants were recruited through labour unions. Of these, 796 completed the retest survey 30 days later. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA, respectively), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)) and SEM were used to assess the psychometric properties. Criterion validity was examined via associations with pain points, pain medication use and sickness absence. Construct validity was assessed using correlations with the prevent for work questionnaire (P4Wq).

EFA and CFA supported a four-factor model (supervisor’s practices, workplace practices, worker involvement practices and workers’ pain practices) with good to excellent fit (comparative fit index, 0.96–0.99; root mean square error of approximation, 0.04–0.06). All scales showed high internal consistency (α=0.80–0.88) and excellent test–retest reliability (ICC=0.86–0.92). Associations with musculoskeletal outcomes supported criterion validity. Weak to moderate correlations with the P4Wq subscales (rho

The MHCQ provides a validated, multidimensional tool to assess workplace climate related to musculoskeletal health. It can support workplace assessments and prevention efforts by capturing shared perceptions of leadership, support, involvement and pain-related norms. Further longitudinal research and the use of objective outcome data are needed to assess predictive validity and strengthen the instrument’s applicability across settings.

Severe aorto-iliac steno-occlusive atherosclerotic disease is a major cause of morbidity and amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. While both open surgical and endovascular revascularisation are standard treatments in this patient group, there is no high-quality randomised evidence to determine which approach offers superior clinical and cost-effectiveness, leading to uncertainty and poor outcomes after intervention.

The EVOCC trial is a national, multicentre, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing open surgery to endovascular revascularisation in patients with symptomatic severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A total of 628 participants across 30 NHS sites in the UK will be randomised 1:1 to receive either open surgery or endovascular (minimally invasive) intervention. The primary outcome is amputation-free survival, defined as time to first event (major lower limb amputation or death). Secondary outcomes include mortality, cardiovascular events, hospital readmissions, re-interventions and quality-of-life measures. An internal pilot phase (10 sites, 6-month duration) will assess recruitment feasibility. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment.

The trial has received ethical approval from a UK Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/SW/0065; trial registration reference: ISRCTN14591444). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

The EVOCC trial is the first RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of open vs endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac disease worldwide. The results will provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice and healthcare policies globally. Results will be disseminated via patient groups, online lay summaries, a trial website, social media, presentations in conferences, a formal scientific publication in a medical journal and direct communications with policymakers across borders.

ISRCTN14591444.

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy has been associated with adverse birth outcomes, including congenital Zika syndrome, characterised by features such as microcephaly. However, the broader neurodevelopmental influence of prenatal ZIKV exposure, especially among offspring without congenital anomalies at birth, remains poorly understood. While previous studies, including a review, have explored neurodevelopment in ZIKV-exposed children, comparative pooled estimates between exposed and unexposed groups remain scarce. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between prenatal ZIKV exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring without congenital anomalies at birth, using data from observational studies with defined control groups.

We will systematically search multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, alongside grey literature sources such as Google Scholar and conference proceedings. Eligible studies will include observational designs (cohort and case-control) comparing neurodevelopmental outcomes between children with and without prenatal ZIKV exposure. Primary outcomes will include gross motor, fine motor, communication, problem-solving, social-emotional and cognitive development assessed with validated tools. Three reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic and further explored through subgroup and meta-regression analyses.

Ethical approval is not required, as the study involves secondary analysis of publicly available data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD420251011184.

The management of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is focused on preventing secondary brain insults, by ensuring adequate cerebral perfusion, oxygenation and substrate delivery. Despite optimisation of intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) using evidence-based guidelines, brain tissue hypoxia can still occur and is strongly associated with adverse functional outcomes post sTBI.

The Brain Oxygen Neuromonitoring in Australia and New Zealand Assessment – Global Trial (BONANZA-GT) is an international, two-arm, open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing sTBI management incorporating early brain tissue oxygen (PbtO₂) monitoring and optimisation, with ICP/CPP-based management alone. A total of 860 adults admitted to participating institutions with non-penetrating sTBI and requiring insertion of an ICP monitor (as determined by the treating neurosurgeon) will be enrolled. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes, as defined by a Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended (GOS-E) >4, at 6 months following injury. Key secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality at ICU discharge, hospital discharge, adverse events, as well as hospital and ICU length of stay and GOS-E at 12 months. The BONANZA-GT will determine whether a protocolised therapeutic strategy guided by continuous PbtO₂ monitoring in addition to ICP/CPP targets results in improved neurological outcomes when compared with standard care using ICP/CPP-guided management alone.

Approval has been obtained from relevant ethics boards in every jurisdiction that is participating in the trial. Inclusion of adults who lack capacity for informed consent will be governed in accordance with the legal requirements of each participating site. Study findings will be presented at scientific meetings and disseminated via peer-review publications.

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12619001328167).

There are substantial barriers to initiate advance care planning (ACP) for persons with chronic-progressive disease in primary care settings. Some challenges may be disease-specific, such as communicating in case of cognitive impairment. This study assessed and compared the initiation of ACP in primary care with persons with dementia, Parkinson’s disease, cancer, organ failure and stroke.

Longitudinal study linking data from a database of Dutch general practices’ electronic health records with national administrative databases managed by Statistics Netherlands.

Data from general practice records of 199 034 community-dwelling persons with chronic-progressive disease diagnosed between 2008 and 2016.

Incidence rate ratio (IRR) of recorded ACP planning conversations per 1000 person-years in persons with a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson’s disease, organ failure, cancer or stroke, compared with persons without the particular diagnosis. Poisson regression and competing risk analysis were performed, adjusted for age, gender, migration background, living situation, frailty index and income, also for disease subsamples.

In adjusted analyses, the rate of first ACP conversation for persons with organ failure was the lowest (IRR 0.70 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.73)). Persons with cancer had the highest rate (IRR 1.75 (95% CI 1.68 to 1.83)). Within the subsample of persons with organ failure, the subsample of persons with dementia and the subsample of stroke, a comorbid diagnosis of cancer increased the probability of ACP. Further, for those with organ failure or cancer, comorbid dementia decreased the probability of ACP.

Considering the complexity of initiating ACP for persons with organ failure or dementia, general practitioners should prioritise offering it to them and their family caregivers. Policy initiatives should stimulate the implementation of ACP for people with chronic-progressive disease.

Rare diseases (RD) are collectively common and often genetic. Families value and can benefit from precise molecular diagnoses. Prolonged diagnostic odysseys exacerbate the burden of RD on patients, families and the healthcare system. Genome sequencing (GS) is a near-comprehensive test for genetic RD, but existing care models—where consultation with a medical geneticist is a prerequisite for testing—predate GS and may limit access or delay diagnosis. Evidence is needed to guide the optimal positioning of GS in care pathways. While initiating GS prior to geneticist consultation has been trialled in acute care settings, there are no data to inform the utility of this approach in outpatient care, where most patients with RD seek genetics services. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic yield, time to diagnosis, clinical and personal utility and incremental cost-effectiveness of GS initiated at the time of referral triage (pre-geneticist evaluation) compared with standard of care.

200 paediatric patients referred to one of two large genetics centres in Ontario, Canada, for suspected genetic RD will be randomised into a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (GS first) or standard of care (geneticist first) arm. An unblinded, permuted block randomisation design will be used, stratified within each recruitment site by phenotype and prior genetic testing. The primary outcome measure is time to genetic diagnosis or to cessation of active follow-up. Survival analysis will be used to analyse time-to-event data. Additional measures will include patient-reported and family-reported measures of satisfaction, understanding and perceived test utility, clinician-reported measures of perceived test utility and management impact, and healthcare system utilisation and costs.

This study was approved by Clinical Trials Ontario. Results will be disseminated, at minimum, via peer-reviewed journals, professional conferences and internal reports to funding bodies. Efforts will be made to share aggregated study results with participants and their families.

NCT06935019.

Food intolerances are prevalent in Europe and can cause considerable physical discomfort, dietary restrictions and psychosocial challenges. Among the prominent causes of food intolerance are defects in the digestion and/or transport of short-chain fermentable carbohydrates, fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs). A common diagnostic tool for food intolerance is the hydrogen breath test, which monitors the production of H₂ gas from the fermentation of ingested FODMAPs by colonic microbiota. However, this method is limited due to its relatively poor correlation with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms experienced by patients. Diagnosis is complicated as food intolerance is often associated with functional GI disorders, while FODMAPs may exert their effects individually or in combination. Further research on the pathophysiology and the impact of intervention strategies for these conditions is required to improve the diagnosis of food intolerance.

The Lactobreath pilot study is a randomised, two-arm, double-blinded controlled study. 120 healthy, free-living adults will undergo 6-hour postprandial tests with lactose or glucose (control) to investigate the molecular composition of human exhaled breath (exhalome) as a potential source of biomarkers associated with clinical and metabolic traits of lactose malabsorption (Lactobreath profiles). This serves as a proof-of-concept for the future application of this technology in diagnosing food intolerance. We will use a sensitive, non-invasive, real-time measurement technique based on secondary electrospray ionisation coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry to analyse the chemical profile of the postprandial exhalome after lactose ingestion. Symptoms of lactose intolerance will be assessed using a standardised questionnaire and mechanistically linked to specific key metabolites of the discriminating breath profile. In parallel, a solid-state sensor will measure postprandial hydrogen gas in breath samples, while GI gases (CH₄, H₂, O₂) and intestinal transit time will be monitored using a novel ingestible gas sensor (Atmo Gas capsule). Metabolites in urine, including lactose-derived metabolites, will be investigated using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Postprandial bowel sounds will be recorded by wearable sensors (DigeHealth AG). Baseline assessments will be completed before the dietary challenge to capture usual dietary intake (repeated 24-hour recall), faecal microbiota (shallow shotgun sequencing) and to evaluate genetic polymorphisms using saliva samples (PCR analysis of selected penetrant single-nucleotide polymorphisms).

The Lactobreath study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland (#2023-01639). The project results will be published in open-access journals, presented at national and international conferences and communicated to the public and other relevant stakeholders via the communication channels of all investigators and partners. All results derived from the study will be accessible, in line with the Swiss National Science Foundation open access policy.

NCT06177938.

Gestational diabetes is a common metabolic disorder in pregnancy which identifies a substantial increased risk of future diabetes. Despite this risk, many individuals are not screened for dysglycaemia in the postpartum period. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an evolving technology that provides details of an individual’s glucose levels throughout the day; however, it has not yet been evaluated as a screening tool for postpartum dysglycaemia. To address this gap, this prospective cohort study will examine the use of CGM in the early postpartum period to predict the risk of maternal dysglycaemia after delivery.

The Predicting Dysglycaemia in Individuals with Gestational Diabetes Immediately Postpartum using CGM (PREDISPOSE) study is a prospective cohort study designed to assess the ability of a CGM device (Freestyle Libre 2) worn in the postpartum period to detect persistent dysglycaemia in individuals with gestational diabetes. The study will recruit 240 individuals with gestational diabetes. Each participant will wear the CGM immediately postpartum and before attending routine postpartum diabetes screening, consisting of a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and related blood work (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), complete blood count and lipid profile). The primary outcome is the accuracy of the area under the curve for all glucose measurements from the first CGM wear to detect postpartum dysglycaemia. We will perform sensitivity and specificity analyses to determine optimal CGM cut-offs to diagnose diabetes or prediabetes. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of postpartum dysglycaemia (based on 75-gram OGTT and/or HbA1c), incidence of postpartum dyslipidaemia, patient acceptability of CGM testing, data variability from CGM and cardiometabolic health outcomes diagnosed in years one, two and five after delivery.

All participating sites have received ethics approval of the current protocol and have started recruitment of participants to the study. The ethics boards that approved this study are the Biomedical Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary, the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board at Mount Sinai Hospital and the Comité d'éthique de la Recherche at Université Laval. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal, regardless of study findings.

NCT04972955. Registration date: 28 June 2021.

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, despite low mortality, significantly impair quality of life (QoL). Up to 80% of patients with dermatological conditions experience severe itch and poor sleep, as well as related mental health challenges such as anxiety and depression. The relationship between skin diseases and mental health highlights the challenges that doctors face in treating these conditions. Existing psychotherapeutics, such as mindfulness training, cognitive behavioural therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy, are widely used and effective in the treatment of mental health illnesses. However, there is limited evidence on the application of such interventions in dermatology, and most mental health apps lack robust clinical evaluation. We report the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and implementation of a mobile app containing dermatology-specified psychotherapeutic strategies in reducing QoL burden.

English-speaking patients aged 16 years and older with psoriasis, eczema or chronic urticaria will be recruited and randomised into the intervention arm (psychotherapeutic application) or active control group (Healthy365 app, a general wellness application managed by the Singapore Health Promotion Board). This allows a comparative assessment of app-usage-specific outcomes while preserving the blinding of all participants. The primary outcome is the change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include physician-assessed disease severity at weeks 8 and 16 relative to baseline, differences in other patient-reported measures at weeks 8, 16 and 32, self-reported treatment adherence and initiation/escalation of systemic medications. To understand how patients engage with the app, we will evaluate the implementation process, focusing on key measures such as engagement, satisfaction and willingness to pay. Statistical analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, and missing data will be analysed using last observation carried forward.

All participants will receive both verbal and written study information that aligns with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group’s Domain Specific Review Board (reference number: 2022/00751). Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

NCT06702293.

SARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against reinfection and severe COVID-19 disease; however, this protective effect may diminish over time. We assessed waning of natural immunity conferred by previous infection against severe disease and symptomatic reinfection in Brazil and Scotland.

We undertook a test-negative design study and nested case–control analysis to estimate waning of natural immunity against severe COVID-19 outcomes and symptomatic reinfection using national linked datasets. We used logistic regression to estimate ORs with 95% CIs. A stratified analysis assessed immunity during the Omicron dominant period in Brazil.

We included data from the adult populations of Brazil and Scotland from 1 June 2020 to 30 April 2022.

Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalisation or death. Reinfection was defined as reverse-transcriptase PCR or rapid antigen test confirmed at least 120 days after primary infection.

From Brazil, we included 30 881 873 tests and 1 301 665 severe COVID-19 outcomes, and from Scotland, we included 1 520 201 tests and 7988 severe COVID-19 outcomes. Against severe outcomes, sustained protection was observed for at least 12 months after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection with little evidence of waning: 12 months postprimary infection: Brazil OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14), Scotland OR 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.04). For symptomatic reinfection, Brazilian data demonstrated evidence of waning in the 12 months following primary infection, although some residual protection remained beyond 12 months: 12 months postprimary infection: OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.43). The greatest reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was in individuals with hybrid immunity (history of previous infection and vaccination), with sustained protection against severe outcomes at 12 months postprimary infection. During the Omicron dominant period in Brazil, odds of symptomatic reinfection were higher and increased more quickly over time when compared with the overall study period, although protection against severe outcomes was sustained at 12 months postprimary infection (whole study: OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14); Omicron phase: OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19)).

Cross-national analyses demonstrate sustained protection against severe COVID-19 disease for at least 12 months following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, with vaccination further enhancing protection. Protection against symptomatic reinfection was lower with evidence of waning, but there remained a protective effect beyond 12 months from primary infection.