Effective treatment for clinical obesity is available but is rarely offered by healthcare systems, which often treat complications without treating the underlying cause. The LightWAY trial will investigate the clinical benefits and harms as well as cost-effectiveness of an intensive weight loss intervention compared with existing weight management programmes for people with clinical obesity.

LightWAY is an investigator-initiated, international, randomised, parallel-group clinical superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment. Six hundred people seeking treatment for clinical obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m² with comorbidities) will be recruited in centres in the UK and Denmark and randomised 1:1 to one of two groups. The experimental group will be offered a 2-year intensive weight loss programme providing support and advice to follow a total diet replacement programme, followed by gradual transition to an energy-reduced diet in combination with increased physical activity and if needed, prescription of weight loss medication. The control group will receive usual care, typically comprising brief behavioural support for weight loss and treatment of the complications of obesity or occasionally referral to specialist weight management services. The two co-primary outcomes are cardiometabolic risk, assessed with metabolic syndrome severity Z-score, and body weight assessed at 2 years. The secondary outcomes include the Short Form-36 mental component scale, 4-metre gait speed and proportion of participants achieving ≥20% weight loss. The key adverse effects will be the proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event, incidence of eating disorders and disproportional loss of bone mass. Incremental cost-effectiveness will be assessed over the trial period and over the lifetime through modelling.

Ethical approval was granted in the UK (August 2024, 24/SC/0211) and Denmark (December 2023, H-23065222). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences and to participants in the trial and clinicians.

NCT06321458.

To clarify and define the clinical practice concept of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery.

A concept analysis guided by Walker and Avant’s method.

MEDLINE (Ovid), AMED-(Ovid), Embase (Elsevier) and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched through 5 December 2024.

Relevant studies that included combinations of the terms ‘early mobilisation’, ‘early ambulation’, ‘early acceleration’, ‘abdominal surgery’ and ‘surgical procedures’ were selected. We restricted the search to English full-text publications involving adult patients, limited to the year 2000 and onward. Inclusion criteria were original research articles describing the timing and/or type of mobilisation.

The study derives its defining attributes, antecedents and consequences through data analysis. To enhance understanding of the model, we constructed related and contrary cases of the concept and outlined relevant empirical referents.

In total, 140 studies were included in the analysis. Early mobilisation is characterised by the key defining attributes of initiating active physical movement, including standing, sitting in a chair or walking, within the first 24 hours of surgery. Antecedents include haemodynamic and respiratory stability, adequate pain management, and the patient’s cognitive and physical readiness. Contextual antecedents include competent and adequately staffed healthcare teams. Consequences include improved physiological recovery and enhanced postoperative outcomes.

This analysis provides a clarified, practice-focused definition of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery. By delineating its key attributes and contextual prerequisites, the study offers a conceptual foundation that can support clinical guidelines, promote consistent implementation and inform future research aimed at optimising postoperative recovery.

The main treatment of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is neurosurgical evacuation with subsequent drainage. However, consensus on optimal drain modality and placement is lacking.

To examine whether 24-hour active subperiosteal drainage is non-inferior to 24-hour passive subdural drainage after a single burr hole evacuation of a symptomatic CSDH.

SUPERDURA is a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial encompassing all neurosurgical units in Denmark. Adult patients with symptomatic CSDH admitted to a Danish neurosurgical unit for single burr hole evacuation will be screened for inclusion. Patients who are not able to give informed consent, and patients with recurrent CSDH, known cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities and other known brain pathologies will be excluded. Patients with bilateral CSDH will be registered as one case and treated similarly on both sides. Before surgical haematoma evacuation, patients will be randomised to 24-hour passive subdural drainage or 24-hour active subperiosteal drainage. The patients included and the two study statisticians will be blinded. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of 90-day mortality and symptomatic CSDH recurrence. Secondary outcomes are 90-day simplified modified Rankin score, 90-day serious adverse events and complications related to surgery or occurring during admission, including intracerebral haemorrhage due to misplaced drains, acute subdural haematoma, tension pneumocephalus, wound infection, drain seepage, subperiosteal haematoma, thromboembolic events, infections and seizures.

A detailed statistical analysis plan is published separately. Sample size simulations of non-inferiority with a threshold of 7% increased relative risk show that a total of 354 participants will be required to demonstrate a relative risk reduction of recurrent CSDH and mortality of 30% for the cohort receiving active subperiosteal drainage given a stable power above 80% with an alpha of 5%. The study inclusion period is estimated to last 2 years.

Ethics approval for the inclusion of competent patients has been obtained from the North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics. Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant neurosurgical meetings.

N-20240009, accepted 13 May 2024 and 13 December 2024.

NCT06621407.

To investigate whether women who experienced pelvic girdle pain (PGP) during pregnancy were able to engage in meaningful activities at 4 months and 3 years post partum, and to identify factors associated with long-term functional outcomes.

Long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial comparing acupuncture and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pregnancy-related PGP.

Physiotherapy outpatient clinics in Sweden.

In total, 113 pregnant women with clinically verified PGP were randomised in the original trial; 86 participated in the initial study phase, 77 attended the 4-month follow-up and 57 completed the 3-year follow-up questionnaire.

The primary outcome was functioning, assessed using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Secondary outcomes included self-reported PGP, overall functioning and the prognostic value of pelvic pain provocation tests at 4 months post partum for persistent PGP at 3 years.

3 years post partum, the mean PSFS score was 8.64, and 45.6% of the participants scored 10, indicating full return to baseline activities. In repeated linear regression analyses, estimated PSFS scores were approximately 3 points lower at baseline and post-treatment compared with the 3-year follow-up (both p

Most women with pregnancy-related PGP regained functioning by 4 months post partum, and this recovery was sustained at 3 years. The number of positive pelvic provocation tests at 4 months post partum predicted persistent pain at 3 years, suggesting potential prognostic value for identifying women at risk of long-term PGP and informing postpartum follow-up strategies.

In ‘FoU i Sverige’ (R&D in Sweden) No. 12726. https://www.researchweb.org/is/sverige/project/127261.

Cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that primarily affects the skin and can mimic inflammatory dermatoses. Unlike many skin diseases, CTCL can lead to disabling symptoms, and advanced CTCL can even be fatal. Early studies investigating health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), common subtypes of CTCL, demonstrated significant impairment across numerous domains. The aim of this current study is to develop a core domain set (CDS) to identify the essential aspects of MF/SS that influence HRQOL that should be measured in therapeutic clinical trials. In the future, this set of core concepts will be used to identify the best patient- reported outcome measure(s) (PROM) for HRQOL for MF/SS clinical research.

Multiple strategies will be used to generate candidate concepts: systematic review of the literature, qualitative study and a survey study of healthcare providers. A Delphi consensus process including a comprehensive group of stakeholders (patients, caregivers/care partners, a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, patient advocacy groups, pharmaceutical industry representatives, methodologists and government agencies) will be used to achieve consensus. Statistical corrections for multiple significance testing and false positive findings will be undertaken.

The study was submitted for and received institutional review board approval at the University of Washington (IRB# STUDY00018890 and STUDY00019407). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants where necessary. We will disseminate our findings through peer-reviewed, open access publications and presentations at national/international conferences. We will provide a plain language summary in lay terms for patients and families to patient advocacy groups for distribution to their network.

The protocol is registered in the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains high but unevenly distributed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Current risk stratification strategies are far from optimal, leading to both undertreatment and overtreatment of patients. The STENO INTEN-CT trial aims to evaluate a strategy of improved CVD risk management by using cardiac CT (coronary artery calcification (CAC)) for stratification and tailoring of multifactorial cardiovascular treatment based on CAC score. We hypothesise that (1) intensified medical treatment will lower CVD event rates in high-risk patients (CAC≥100), and (2) less intensive multifactorial treatment is safe in very low-risk patients (CAC=0).

The Steno INTEN-CT trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, event-driven randomised controlled trial including patients with T2DM without known CVD. All participants (expected n=7300) will be invited for a non-contrast coronary CT scan. After the scan, participants will be randomised to either standard treatment (blinded for CAC results) or CAC-based treatment. Participants in CAC-based treatment and their general practitioner (GP) will receive information on CAC and a recommendation of multifactorial treatment. High-risk participants in the interventional arm will be invited for one or more initial study visits to intensify treatment with a combination of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, high-dose lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and antithrombotic treatment. Very low-risk patients in the interventional arm will be recommended less intensive treatment targets. After initial study-related activities, all participants will continue to be taken care of by their GP guided by specific treatment recommendations. The primary outcome in the primary hierarchical analysis (the rate of the combined CVD endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure) will be monitored through national health registries. The trial is event-driven, but a median follow-up of 5 years is expected. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, quality-adjusted life years and healthcare costs.

The protocol V.1.9 is approved by the Research Ethics Committee and the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The results of the study—positive, negative or neutral—will be published in peer-reviewed journals and through www.clinicaltrials.org.

NCT05700877.

Forming secure attachment relationships provides children with the best possible start to life. Children from families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs (eg, caregivers with lived experience of trauma, experiencing mental illness or substance abuse, current or past domestic violence, and/or current or a history of child protection issues) are at the greatest risk of experiencing attachment disturbances. Nurturing Connections is a new early intervention service launched by the New South Wales State Ministry of Health targeting both caregiver adversity and the caregiver-child attachment relationships in families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs. This paper outlines the evaluation protocol of the Nurturing Connections Programme.

A mixed-methods design will be used to undertake an implementation and outcomes evaluation. The study will draw on both qualitative and quantitative data, including routinely collected service data, surveys, participant observations, and semi-structured interview and yarning circle data. Appropriate descriptive and inferential techniques will be used to analyse quantitative data while thematic analysis will be drawn on to analyse qualitative data.

This research was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01715). The Mid North Coast Local Health District also received ethics approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (2380/25). Evaluation findings will be shared via published manuscripts, conference presentations, as well as a final report to funding bodies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important treatment option for selected cancer patients in recent years. In this overview of systematic reviews, we aim to present a comprehensive summary of the evidence on neurological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with ICIs.

The overview will follow the preferred reporting items for overview of reviews statement. All systematic reviews reporting on neurological irAEs in adult patients treated with ICIs will be included. We will search PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane’s Database of Systematic Reviews. Two authors will independently screen studies and extract data, with disagreements resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR-2. We will assess overlap by identifying shared primary studies and summarising their frequency in a table. Data will be presented narratively and in tables; when possible, frequencies of neurological irAEs and weighted means, along with associated distributions, will be reported.

As this study involves secondary analysis of published literature and does not include primary data collection, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

CRD420251020892.

Deaths related to drug overdose and suicide in the USA have increased 500% and 35%, respectively, over the last two decades. The human and economic costs to society associated with these ‘deaths of despair’ are immense. Great efforts and substantial investments have been made in treatment and prevention, yet these efforts have not abated these increasing trajectories of deaths over time. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and highlighted these problems. Notably, some geographical areas (eg, Appalachia, farmland) and some communities (eg, low-income persons, ‘essential workers’, minoritised populations) have been disproportionately affected. Risk factors have been identified for substance use and suicide deaths: forms of adversity, neglect, opportunity indexes and trauma. Yet, the biological, psychological and social mechanisms driving risk are not uniform. Notably, most people exposed to risk factors do not become symptomatic and could broadly be considered resilient. Achieving a better understanding of biological, psychological and social mechanisms underlying both pathology and resilience will be crucial for improving approaches for prevention and treatment and creating precision medicine approaches for more efficient and effective treatment.

The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multimodal, integrated familial study designed to identify biological, psychological and social risk and resilience factors and processes leading to mental health disorders, substance use disorders, substance overdose, suicide and associated psychological/medical comorbidities which reduce life expectancy and quality of life. It includes two nested longitudinal samples: (1) WD Survey: an address-based random population epidemiological sample of 15 000 individuals (unique households) representative of the state of Ohio assessed for psychosocial, psychiatric, behavioural health and substance use factors and (2) Brain Health Study: a family-based, multimodal, deep-phenotyping study conducted in 1200 families (up to 3600 persons aged 12–72 years) including MRI, electroencephalography, blood biomarkers and psychiatric diagnostic interviews, as well as neuropsychological, psychosocial functioning and family/community history, dynamics and support assessments. SOAR is designed to discover, develop and deploy advanced predictive analytics and interventions to transform mental health prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.

All participants will provide written informed consent (or parental permission and assent for minors). The study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (study numbers 2023H0316 (Brain Health) and 2023H0350 (Wellness Survey). The Brain Health study was also approved by institutional review boards at each partnering institution involved in conducting participant assessments. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, policymakers and the general public, using local and international academic channels (academic journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach (workshops and seminars).

To estimate condition-specific patient travel distances and associated carbon emissions across common chronic diseases in routine National Health Service (NHS) care, and to assess the potential carbon savings of modal shifts in transportation.

Retrospective population-based cohort study.

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland.

6599 patients aged 50–55 years at diagnosis, including cardiovascular disease (n=1711), epilepsy (n=1044), cancer (n=716), rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=172) and a matched control group based on age, sex and area-level deprivation (n=2956).

Annual home-to-clinic distances and associated carbon emissions modelled under four transport modes (petrol car, electric car, bus, train) across five time points: 2-year prediagnosis, diagnosis year and 2-year postdiagnosis.

Mean annual travel distances to hospital varied by condition and peaked at diagnosis. Patients with cancer had the highest travel distances (161 km/patient/year for men; 139 km/patient/year for women), followed by RA (approximately 78 km/patient/year). The matched control group travelled 2/patient/year to 8.0 kg CO₂/patient/year. Bus travel resulted in intermediate emissions, estimated between 10.5 and 8.0 kg CO₂/patient. When travel was modelled using electric vehicles, emissions dropped between 3.5 and 2.7 kg for all conditions. Train travel produced similarly low emissions. Reducing petrol car travel from 100% to 60% lowered emissions up to 6.6 kg CO₂/patient.

Condition-specific estimates of healthcare-related travel emissions provide baseline understanding of the opportunities and challenges for decarbonising healthcare. Emission reduction is most achievable through modal shift, yet such shifts depend on factors beyond NHS control—such as transport infrastructure, digital access and social equity. Multisectoral strategies, including targeted telemedicine and integrated transport and urban planning, are critical to achieving net-zero healthcare while maintaining equitable access to care.

A cancer diagnosis not only profoundly impacts individuals but also the very core of their families, reshaping their lives in many ways. However, there is a lack of focus on the well-being and health of the entire family across adult cancer research. This is concerning given that one-third of the Danish population will get a cancer diagnosis before the age of 75, suggesting that many Danes will become caregivers during their lifetime. In addition, identifying vulnerable families is challenging, and the determinant factors for their vulnerability are unknown.

The principal aim of this study is to investigate family health during cancer treatment. This will be done by gathering information on various parameters such as perceived support, quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with cancer and families across the cancer trajectory. Additionally, the study seeks to pinpoint particularly vulnerable families and investigate contributing factors to their vulnerability.

This mixed-methods study follows a sequential explanatory design, combining patient-reported outcomes in a longitudinal, prospective multicentre survey with interviews conducted with a nested sampling of the participants from the survey. A total of 240 patients diagnosed with prostate-, breast-, gastrointestinal- and lymphoma cancer, and designated adult family caregivers will be recruited from six different sites for the survey. Variables such as family health, needs and perceived support, quality of life, self-efficacy, depression, stress and resilience will be explored. Survey data will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. The interviews (n=12–15) will be conducted twice with patients and caregivers jointly: once during the treatment phase (3 months) and once after completion of treatment (12 months). For the survey part, we estimated a sample size with 90% power and 5% significance to detect a minimal clinically important change in the Family Health Scale. Assuming an SD of 2x22 = 31, based on a cross-sectional SD of 22, 44 patients per group were required; to allow for dropout, 60 per group (240 total) were included. Patient and caregiver characteristics will be summarised descriptively. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes will be analysed with linear mixed regression, separately for patients and caregivers. Changes will be reported as mean differences with 95% CIs and compared with published minimal clinically important differences or, if unavailable, 0.3xbaseline SD. For the qualitative part, thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke is chosen to extract data, identify patterns and analyse data and themes from the interviews. NVivo will be used for coding interview data.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Measures will be taken to ensure confidentiality, data protection and participant safety throughout the study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06433349. Protocol version 2.0, June 2024.

Despite an increasing use of screens among preschool children and evidence suggesting potential adverse effects, there is a paucity of longitudinal research that aims to disentangle the multifaceted components of screen use and their unique associations with development. We present a protocol for a large-scale national longitudinal study with repeated measurements in Danish preschool children, with the aim of investigating the cross-sectional and cross-lagged longitudinal associations between screen use and psychological outcomes.

The Digital Child Study is a national prospective observational cohort of Danish preschool children. Baseline parent-report data collection commenced in 2024 via online questionnaires, and in total will include three time points over 1 year: baseline (age 4 years), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months (ages 4.5 and 5 years). Participants were divided into two waves based on birth dates, starting in March and September 2024. Recruitment targeted parents and primary caregivers of all Danish children born between specific dates in 2020. Of 30 235 children whose parents were sent invitations, baseline questionnaire data were available for 11 690 (39%).

Children’s screen use was measured by detailed information of amount, content and timing of children’s screen use, and the broader context, incorporating parental mediation strategies, attitudes, motivations and practices. Cognitive and socioemotional developmental outcomes were measured using validated tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Nordic Five-to-Fifteen parent questionnaire and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Preschool Version. Questionnaire data will be linked to national social and health registries to enable long-term follow-up. Statistical analyses will include longitudinal modelling to explore associations between screen use and developmental outcomes, with sensitivity analyses for robustness. The study’s large sample size provides high statistical power to detect meaningful effects.

The study adheres to ethical research guidelines, ensuring voluntary participation, confidentiality and compliance with data protection laws, with approvals from relevant authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and plain-language summaries to engage stakeholders and the broader community.

The evidence for the optimal duration of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is scarce. Two previous trials have compared different durations of psychotherapy. The first compared 6 months versus 12 months of dialectical behaviour therapy for BPD (the FASTER trial). The second compared 5 months versus 14 months of mentalisation-based therapy for BPD (the MBT-RCT trial). The primary objective of the present study will be to provide an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials by combining the two short-term groups and the two long-term groups from the FASTER and MBT-RCT trials, thereby providing greater statistical power than the individual trials. Accordingly, we will evaluate the overall evidence on the effects of short-term versus long-term psychotherapy for BPD and investigate whether certain subgroups might benefit from short-term versus long-term psychotherapy.

An individual patient data pooled analysis of the FASTER trial and the MBT-RCT trial will be conducted. The primary outcome will be a composite of the proportion of participants with a suicide, a suicide attempt or a psychiatric hospitalisation. The secondary outcome will be the proportion of participants with self-harm. Exploratory outcomes will be BPD symptoms, symptom distress, level of functioning and quality of life. We will primarily assess outcomes at 15 months after randomisation for the FASTER trial and at 16 months after randomisation for the MBT-RCT trial. Predefined subgroups based on the design variables in the original trials will be tested for interaction with the intervention as follows: trial, sex (male compared with female), age (below or at 30 years compared with above 30 years) and baseline level of functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning baseline score at 0–49 compared with 50–100).

The statistical analyses will be performed on anonymised trial data that have already been approved by the respective ethical committees that originally assessed the included trials. The final analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and the results will be presented at national seminars and international conferences.

CRD42024612840.

Cortical spreading depolarisation (SD) is a pathological wave of depolarisation in the cortex. SDs occur frequently after severe acute brain injury, and SDs in clusters can contribute to secondary brain damage in patients with severe acute brain injury through hypoperfusion and upregulation of cerebral metabolism in vulnerable brain tissue. Ketamine appears to inhibit SDs both in vitro and in patient series of severe acute brain injury. The KETA-BID trial aims to examine the efficacy and safety of S-ketamine for SDs in severe acute brain injury, as well as the feasibility of the trial design.

This randomised, blinded feasibility and pilot trial includes adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing a supratentorial craniotomy or craniectomy for severe acute brain injury (ie, traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage or spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage). During surgery, an electrocorticography (ECoG) strip is placed adjacent to injured brain tissue. Patients are continuously monitored throughout their stay at the neurointensive care unit and the neurosurgical step-down unit. In the case of an SD, physiological optimisation of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO₂), core temperature and blood glucose is initiated. Participants developing SD clusters are randomised for continuous infusion with S-ketamine or matching placebo in a 1:1 allocation with full blinding of the treatment allocation. Infusion rates (ie, dose) and duration of trial medication are adjusted following a dosing algorithm according to SD occurrence. Surviving participants are followed until 6 months after the injury with recording of functional outcome. The primary outcome is occurrence of SDs per hour of monitoring after randomisation.

The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-21056972), the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT 2021-003716-12), as well as the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS 2024-515315-22-00) approved this trial. This trial will provide insight into both SD and the clinical effects of ketamine following severe acute brain injury, presenting a potential new treatment for these patients. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications.

NCT05095857.