Conectar
Forming secure attachment relationships provides children with the best possible start to life. Children from families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs (eg, caregivers with lived experience of trauma, experiencing mental illness or substance abuse, current or past domestic violence, and/or current or a history of child protection issues) are at the greatest risk of experiencing attachment disturbances. Nurturing Connections is a new early intervention service launched by the New South Wales State Ministry of Health targeting both caregiver adversity and the caregiver-child attachment relationships in families with high psychosocial vulnerability and complex mental health needs. This paper outlines the evaluation protocol of the Nurturing Connections Programme.
A mixed-methods design will be used to undertake an implementation and outcomes evaluation. The study will draw on both qualitative and quantitative data, including routinely collected service data, surveys, participant observations, and semi-structured interview and yarning circle data. Appropriate descriptive and inferential techniques will be used to analyse quantitative data while thematic analysis will be drawn on to analyse qualitative data.
This research was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01715). The Mid North Coast Local Health District also received ethics approval from the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (2380/25). Evaluation findings will be shared via published manuscripts, conference presentations, as well as a final report to funding bodies.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important treatment option for selected cancer patients in recent years. In this overview of systematic reviews, we aim to present a comprehensive summary of the evidence on neurological immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with ICIs.
The overview will follow the preferred reporting items for overview of reviews statement. All systematic reviews reporting on neurological irAEs in adult patients treated with ICIs will be included. We will search PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane’s Database of Systematic Reviews. Two authors will independently screen studies and extract data, with disagreements resolved by discussion or a third reviewer. Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR-2. We will assess overlap by identifying shared primary studies and summarising their frequency in a table. Data will be presented narratively and in tables; when possible, frequencies of neurological irAEs and weighted means, along with associated distributions, will be reported.
As this study involves secondary analysis of published literature and does not include primary data collection, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.
CRD420251020892.
Deaths related to drug overdose and suicide in the USA have increased 500% and 35%, respectively, over the last two decades. The human and economic costs to society associated with these ‘deaths of despair’ are immense. Great efforts and substantial investments have been made in treatment and prevention, yet these efforts have not abated these increasing trajectories of deaths over time. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and highlighted these problems. Notably, some geographical areas (eg, Appalachia, farmland) and some communities (eg, low-income persons, ‘essential workers’, minoritised populations) have been disproportionately affected. Risk factors have been identified for substance use and suicide deaths: forms of adversity, neglect, opportunity indexes and trauma. Yet, the biological, psychological and social mechanisms driving risk are not uniform. Notably, most people exposed to risk factors do not become symptomatic and could broadly be considered resilient. Achieving a better understanding of biological, psychological and social mechanisms underlying both pathology and resilience will be crucial for improving approaches for prevention and treatment and creating precision medicine approaches for more efficient and effective treatment.
The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multimodal, integrated familial study designed to identify biological, psychological and social risk and resilience factors and processes leading to mental health disorders, substance use disorders, substance overdose, suicide and associated psychological/medical comorbidities which reduce life expectancy and quality of life. It includes two nested longitudinal samples: (1) WD Survey: an address-based random population epidemiological sample of 15 000 individuals (unique households) representative of the state of Ohio assessed for psychosocial, psychiatric, behavioural health and substance use factors and (2) Brain Health Study: a family-based, multimodal, deep-phenotyping study conducted in 1200 families (up to 3600 persons aged 12–72 years) including MRI, electroencephalography, blood biomarkers and psychiatric diagnostic interviews, as well as neuropsychological, psychosocial functioning and family/community history, dynamics and support assessments. SOAR is designed to discover, develop and deploy advanced predictive analytics and interventions to transform mental health prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.
All participants will provide written informed consent (or parental permission and assent for minors). The study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (study numbers 2023H0316 (Brain Health) and 2023H0350 (Wellness Survey). The Brain Health study was also approved by institutional review boards at each partnering institution involved in conducting participant assessments. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, policymakers and the general public, using local and international academic channels (academic journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach (workshops and seminars).
To estimate condition-specific patient travel distances and associated carbon emissions across common chronic diseases in routine National Health Service (NHS) care, and to assess the potential carbon savings of modal shifts in transportation.
Retrospective population-based cohort study.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Scotland.
6599 patients aged 50–55 years at diagnosis, including cardiovascular disease (n=1711), epilepsy (n=1044), cancer (n=716), rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=172) and a matched control group based on age, sex and area-level deprivation (n=2956).
Annual home-to-clinic distances and associated carbon emissions modelled under four transport modes (petrol car, electric car, bus, train) across five time points: 2-year prediagnosis, diagnosis year and 2-year postdiagnosis.
Mean annual travel distances to hospital varied by condition and peaked at diagnosis. Patients with cancer had the highest travel distances (161 km/patient/year for men; 139 km/patient/year for women), followed by RA (approximately 78 km/patient/year). The matched control group travelled 2/patient/year to 8.0 kg CO2/patient/year. Bus travel resulted in intermediate emissions, estimated between 10.5 and 8.0 kg CO2/patient. When travel was modelled using electric vehicles, emissions dropped between 3.5 and 2.7 kg for all conditions. Train travel produced similarly low emissions. Reducing petrol car travel from 100% to 60% lowered emissions up to 6.6 kg CO2/patient.
Condition-specific estimates of healthcare-related travel emissions provide baseline understanding of the opportunities and challenges for decarbonising healthcare. Emission reduction is most achievable through modal shift, yet such shifts depend on factors beyond NHS control—such as transport infrastructure, digital access and social equity. Multisectoral strategies, including targeted telemedicine and integrated transport and urban planning, are critical to achieving net-zero healthcare while maintaining equitable access to care.
To examine how nurse managers perceive and respond to conflicting priorities between patients' needs, employees' well-being and organisational objectives in decisions regarding work scheduling.
An embedded case study of nurse managers' decisions about new work scheduling in community healthcare in a Norwegian municipality.
We accessed internal and national policy documents outlining the potential benefits of increasing full-time positions in healthcare and conducted 24 semi-structured interviews in January and February 2019. During the thematic data analysis, institutional logics emerged as a theoretical lens to understand nurse managers' conflicting priorities and responses.
We found that nurse managers handled conflicting priorities by prioritising an employee logic in a way that allowed them to combine this with elements of managerial and professional logics within the institutional context.
The institutional logics perspective extends our understanding of how nurse managers interpret the values, norms and practices underlying their priorities.
Nurse managers should (1) recognise that multiple institutional logics may be available to guide their responses to conflicting priorities and (2) carefully consider how to combine employee involvement with managerial and organizational responsibilities.
We studied how nurse managers perceive and respond to conflicting priorities in work scheduling decisions. Nurse managers are embedded in institutional contexts with co-existing logics and their decisions can be understood through an employee logic, but also in combination with managerial and professional logics. Nurse managers should carefully consider their work scheduling decisions from the perspectives of different logics, ensuring that the decisions benefit employees, patients and their employer.
The study is reported according to COREQ guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
A cancer diagnosis not only profoundly impacts individuals but also the very core of their families, reshaping their lives in many ways. However, there is a lack of focus on the well-being and health of the entire family across adult cancer research. This is concerning given that one-third of the Danish population will get a cancer diagnosis before the age of 75, suggesting that many Danes will become caregivers during their lifetime. In addition, identifying vulnerable families is challenging, and the determinant factors for their vulnerability are unknown.
The principal aim of this study is to investigate family health during cancer treatment. This will be done by gathering information on various parameters such as perceived support, quality of life and self-efficacy in patients with cancer and families across the cancer trajectory. Additionally, the study seeks to pinpoint particularly vulnerable families and investigate contributing factors to their vulnerability.
This mixed-methods study follows a sequential explanatory design, combining patient-reported outcomes in a longitudinal, prospective multicentre survey with interviews conducted with a nested sampling of the participants from the survey. A total of 240 patients diagnosed with prostate-, breast-, gastrointestinal- and lymphoma cancer, and designated adult family caregivers will be recruited from six different sites for the survey. Variables such as family health, needs and perceived support, quality of life, self-efficacy, depression, stress and resilience will be explored. Survey data will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. The interviews (n=12–15) will be conducted twice with patients and caregivers jointly: once during the treatment phase (3 months) and once after completion of treatment (12 months). For the survey part, we estimated a sample size with 90% power and 5% significance to detect a minimal clinically important change in the Family Health Scale. Assuming an SD of 2x22 = 31, based on a cross-sectional SD of 22, 44 patients per group were required; to allow for dropout, 60 per group (240 total) were included. Patient and caregiver characteristics will be summarised descriptively. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes will be analysed with linear mixed regression, separately for patients and caregivers. Changes will be reported as mean differences with 95% CIs and compared with published minimal clinically important differences or, if unavailable, 0.3xbaseline SD. For the qualitative part, thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke is chosen to extract data, identify patterns and analyse data and themes from the interviews. NVivo will be used for coding interview data.
The study will be conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Measures will be taken to ensure confidentiality, data protection and participant safety throughout the study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06433349. Protocol version 2.0, June 2024.
To explore the familial, emotional, social and school-related challenges experienced by school-aged siblings of children with cancer, focusing on how these challenges intersect across hospital, home and school in their everyday lives.
Qualitative, two-phase, multi-site study.
Fieldwork was conducted at two distinct paediatric oncology wards, followed by semi-structured interviews with 11 siblings (aged 7–19 years) and 20 parents, recruited through criterion-based sampling. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Analysis showed that siblings were often marginalised in hospital life due to (1) family logistics; (2) hospital-induced restrictions, rules and physical spaces and (3) perceptions of their presence as ‘problematic’, ultimately limiting their access. In family life, siblings experienced peripheral roles because (1) they were cared for by others, (2) had their needs subordinated and (3) faced shifting expectations. At school, siblings encountered (1) limited understanding from classmates and teachers and (2) insufficient support resources.
Siblings of children with cancer face significant, interconnected challenges, often amplified by the structural frameworks of healthcare, family and school contexts.
Siblings of children with cancer are often marginalised in their own lives. In healthcare, a family-centred approach to care should formally and actively include siblings. Nurses are well-positioned to promote this, ensuring whole-family support. Siblings would benefit from coordinated support bridging hospital, home and school.
This study adheres to the SRQR Checklist.
Parents helped shape the study focus by discussing preliminary observations and potential support needs.
Despite an increasing use of screens among preschool children and evidence suggesting potential adverse effects, there is a paucity of longitudinal research that aims to disentangle the multifaceted components of screen use and their unique associations with development. We present a protocol for a large-scale national longitudinal study with repeated measurements in Danish preschool children, with the aim of investigating the cross-sectional and cross-lagged longitudinal associations between screen use and psychological outcomes.
The Digital Child Study is a national prospective observational cohort of Danish preschool children. Baseline parent-report data collection commenced in 2024 via online questionnaires, and in total will include three time points over 1 year: baseline (age 4 years), and follow-ups at 6 and 12 months (ages 4.5 and 5 years). Participants were divided into two waves based on birth dates, starting in March and September 2024. Recruitment targeted parents and primary caregivers of all Danish children born between specific dates in 2020. Of 30 235 children whose parents were sent invitations, baseline questionnaire data were available for 11 690 (39%).
Children’s screen use was measured by detailed information of amount, content and timing of children’s screen use, and the broader context, incorporating parental mediation strategies, attitudes, motivations and practices. Cognitive and socioemotional developmental outcomes were measured using validated tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Nordic Five-to-Fifteen parent questionnaire and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Preschool Version. Questionnaire data will be linked to national social and health registries to enable long-term follow-up. Statistical analyses will include longitudinal modelling to explore associations between screen use and developmental outcomes, with sensitivity analyses for robustness. The study’s large sample size provides high statistical power to detect meaningful effects.
The study adheres to ethical research guidelines, ensuring voluntary participation, confidentiality and compliance with data protection laws, with approvals from relevant authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and plain-language summaries to engage stakeholders and the broader community.
The evidence for the optimal duration of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is scarce. Two previous trials have compared different durations of psychotherapy. The first compared 6 months versus 12 months of dialectical behaviour therapy for BPD (the FASTER trial). The second compared 5 months versus 14 months of mentalisation-based therapy for BPD (the MBT-RCT trial). The primary objective of the present study will be to provide an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised clinical trials by combining the two short-term groups and the two long-term groups from the FASTER and MBT-RCT trials, thereby providing greater statistical power than the individual trials. Accordingly, we will evaluate the overall evidence on the effects of short-term versus long-term psychotherapy for BPD and investigate whether certain subgroups might benefit from short-term versus long-term psychotherapy.
An individual patient data pooled analysis of the FASTER trial and the MBT-RCT trial will be conducted. The primary outcome will be a composite of the proportion of participants with a suicide, a suicide attempt or a psychiatric hospitalisation. The secondary outcome will be the proportion of participants with self-harm. Exploratory outcomes will be BPD symptoms, symptom distress, level of functioning and quality of life. We will primarily assess outcomes at 15 months after randomisation for the FASTER trial and at 16 months after randomisation for the MBT-RCT trial. Predefined subgroups based on the design variables in the original trials will be tested for interaction with the intervention as follows: trial, sex (male compared with female), age (below or at 30 years compared with above 30 years) and baseline level of functioning (Global Assessment of Functioning baseline score at 0–49 compared with 50–100).
The statistical analyses will be performed on anonymised trial data that have already been approved by the respective ethical committees that originally assessed the included trials. The final analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and the results will be presented at national seminars and international conferences.
CRD42024612840.
Cortical spreading depolarisation (SD) is a pathological wave of depolarisation in the cortex. SDs occur frequently after severe acute brain injury, and SDs in clusters can contribute to secondary brain damage in patients with severe acute brain injury through hypoperfusion and upregulation of cerebral metabolism in vulnerable brain tissue. Ketamine appears to inhibit SDs both in vitro and in patient series of severe acute brain injury. The KETA-BID trial aims to examine the efficacy and safety of S-ketamine for SDs in severe acute brain injury, as well as the feasibility of the trial design.
This randomised, blinded feasibility and pilot trial includes adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing a supratentorial craniotomy or craniectomy for severe acute brain injury (ie, traumatic brain injury, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage or spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage). During surgery, an electrocorticography (ECoG) strip is placed adjacent to injured brain tissue. Patients are continuously monitored throughout their stay at the neurointensive care unit and the neurosurgical step-down unit. In the case of an SD, physiological optimisation of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2), core temperature and blood glucose is initiated. Participants developing SD clusters are randomised for continuous infusion with S-ketamine or matching placebo in a 1:1 allocation with full blinding of the treatment allocation. Infusion rates (ie, dose) and duration of trial medication are adjusted following a dosing algorithm according to SD occurrence. Surviving participants are followed until 6 months after the injury with recording of functional outcome. The primary outcome is occurrence of SDs per hour of monitoring after randomisation.
The Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-21056972), the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT 2021-003716-12), as well as the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS 2024-515315-22-00) approved this trial. This trial will provide insight into both SD and the clinical effects of ketamine following severe acute brain injury, presenting a potential new treatment for these patients. The findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications.
To explore the practice of mobilisation of conscious and mechanically ventilated patients and the interaction between patients, nurses and physiotherapists.
Long-term consequences of critical illness can be reduced by mobilisation starting in Intensive Care Units, but implementation in clinical practice is presently sparse.
A qualitative study with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.
Participant observations in three Intensive Care Units involved twelve conscious mechanically ventilated patients, thirty-one nurses and four physiotherapists. Additionally seven semi-structured patient interviews, respectively at the ward and after discharge and two focus group interviews with healthcare professionals were conducted. The data analysis was inspired by Ricoeur's interpretation theory. The study adhered to the COREQ checklist.
Healthcare professionals performed a balance of support and guidance to promote mobilisation practice. The complexity of ICU mobilisation required a flexible mobility plan. Furthermore, interaction with feedback and humour was found to be ‘a leverage’ for patient's motivation to partake in mobilisation.
The practice of mobilisation found patients striving to cope and healthcare professionals promoting a ‘balanced standing by’ and negotiating the flexible mobility plan to support mobilisation.
The study revealed a need to clarify interprofessional communication to align expectations towards mobilisation of conscious and mechanically ventilated patients.
The study demonstrated the important role of healthcare professionals to perform a stepwise and ‘balanced standing by’ in adequately supporting and challenging the mobilisation of mechanically ventilated patients. Furthermore, a synergy can arise when nurses and physiotherapists use supplementary feedback and humour, and cooperate based on a flexible situation-specific mobility plan in intensive care.
To explore registered nurses' thinking strategies during the drug administration process in nursing homes.
An exploratory qualitative design.
Eight registered nurses, one male and seven female, in five nursing home wards in Mid-Norway were observed during 15 drug dispensing rounds (175 drug dispensing episodes). Think Aloud sessions with follow-up individual interviews were conducted. The Think Aloud data were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis based on Marsha Fonteyn's description of 17 thinking strategies. Interview data were used to clarify missing information and validate the content of Think Aloud data.
The registered nurses used all 17 thinking strategies described by Fonteyn, including several variants of each strategy. The three most frequent were ‘providing explanations’, ‘setting priorities’ and ‘drawing conclusions’. In addition, we found two novel thinking strategies that did not fit into Fonteyn's template, which were labelled ‘controlling’ and ‘interacting’. Among all strategies, ‘controlling’ was by far the most used, serving as a means for the registered nurses to stay on track and navigate through various interruptions, while also minimising errors during drug dispensing.
The study highlights the diverse thinking strategies employed by registered nurses in nursing homes during medication administration. The findings emphasise the multifaceted nature of medication administration and underscore the importance of skilled personnel in ensuring medication safety. Recognising the significance of these findings is crucial for maintaining patient well-being and upholding medication safety standards in healthcare settings.
Understanding the thinking strategies employed by registered nurses can inform training programmes and enhance the clinical judgements of health care professionals involved in medication administration, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced medication errors in practice.
Patients were involved in this study as recipients of drugs which the nurses distributed during the observations. The patients were involved as a third party and consent to the observations was either given by the patients themselves or relatives in cases where the patient was not competent to consent. No personal information was collected about the patients.
The reporting of this study adhered to the COREQ checklist.
To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of oral care during hospitalisation to identify needs and challenges.
Daily oral care is important to patients' health and well-being, to prevent diseases in the oral cavity, systemic infections and increased morbidity, which subsequently can lead to prolonged hospitalisation and, at worst, increased mortality. Despite this knowledge, oral care is a neglected part of nursing practice. Studies do not clearly identify barriers regarding oral care, as the existing knowledge is inadequate.
A qualitative study exploring participants' experiences to gain new in-depth knowledge of oral care among hospitalised patients.
A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was applied. Participant observations were conducted on five hospital wards, combined with individual semi-structured interviews with 16 patients and 15 HCP. Data analysis was based on Ricoeur's theory of narrative and interpretation.
Four themes describing the challenges regarding oral care emerged: Oral care as a gut feeling; oral care fades into the background; even self-reliant patients need help with oral care; and the mouth reflects the life lived.
The identified challenges show there is a need for improvement in the health professional approach to oral care in nursing practice. Focus on increasing HCPs' knowledge, skills and competences can increase their nursing agency and support patients' self-care capacity.
Investigation of oral care during hospitalisation revealed four main challenges concerning both patients' and HCPs' lack of knowledge and awareness of oral care. Thus, patients and HCPs should be included in developing solutions to improve oral care in nursing practice.
The COREQ criteria for reporting qualitative research were adhered to.
A patient representative was involved in the discussion of the proposal, conduct and results of the study.
FreshRSS 