Community participatory modelling merges participatory research approaches with mathematical modelling. Participatory approaches are grounded in the engagement of people with lived experience (eg, who are affected by the health condition under study) throughout the research process. Mathematical modelling of infectious disease (ID) dynamic transmissions is increasingly used as a tool for public health decision-making, generating predictions, inferring mechanisms and estimating the impact of potential interventions—all of which guide policies, strategies and resource allocation as part of the preparation and response to ID epidemics. However, little is known about the engagement of people with lived experience and affected communities in the ID modelling process. We will map the literature to explore participatory approaches undertaken in ID modelling (practical aspects of formalising participatory modelling), levels of participation and the potential influence from the perspective of communities engaged.

The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The search strategy includes three electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase), no language restrictions and sources published from 2000 to present. We will implement the search with and without the participatory keyword, as we recognise that some studies do not explicitly term community engagement as participatory modelling. After deduplication, two authors will independently screen the titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved with a third team member. We will extract the relevant information from the main text, parameter tables, supplemental files, bibliography, acknowledgment and author affiliation sections. The data extraction will follow a deductive content analysis where we draw from community-based participatory research approaches and established mathematical modelling steps. We will also extract data to assess whether there was equitable engagement of knowledge users by checking for indicators of three equitable engagement domains as outlined by the Ward framework (equity within partnership (eg, whether knowledge user influenced modelling decisions or remuneration), capacity to engage in future partnerships and shift in power/influence (eg, coauthorship). We will supplement our narrative analyses with summaries in tabular format and using appropriate data visualisations.

No ethics approval will be required for this scoping review because we will map evidence from publicly available literature sources. We will develop multilingual abstracts or one-page lay summaries of the findings (English, French and Swahili), a policy brief and will coauthor an open-access journal article. A summary of the findings will be shared via knowledge user-led presentations at the Maisha HIV and AIDS Conference and with other community-based organisations at the quarterly peer-to-peer support meetings.

The protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XQ2WP (December 2024).

Vector control is imperative for eliminating leishmaniasis as a public health problem in Kenya. As elimination efforts expand in East Africa, it is crucial to understand the current research landscape. To address that need and identify gaps, a scoping review was conducted to characterise the landscape of leishmaniasis vector research in Kenya.

Building on a previously published scoping review by this team, we updated database searches in PubMed, Embase via Embase.com, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry to incorporate literature up to 4 January 2024 and focused on vector-related papers. Studies classified as ‘prevention’ in the original scoping review were included due to overlapping definitions.

A total of 95 studies were included in the analysis. Although a wide range of sandfly species have been documented, most of the research is outdated, having taken place 20–40 years ago. Existing studies are mostly epidemiological with little focus on basic and clinical research. There are also no studies on post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis despite its potential contribution to the disease transmission cycle. The geographical scope of the research is largely limited to traditional transmission foci with little attention to new disease hotspots such as North Eastern Kenya.

These research gaps need to be addressed to better inform the country’s leishmaniasis prevention and vector control strategy.