Conectar
In this commentary, I consider the disparity between the care we see as a necessity for cancer patients and the lack of care we afford to many persons with chronic disease.
I ground my arguments in my own clinical practice and research experiences over a 50-year period augmented by reference to available literature sources.
In tracing developments within the fields of cancer and chronic illness care, I draw on my own research and that of others.
Although chronic illness has long been recognised as causing the majority of the burden on our health care systems and as a significant source of suffering in our society, it has not attracted the level of enthusiasm from researchers, policy makers, and health care systems that we have seen in the context of other diseases such as cancer. Nurses have an intimate knowledge of the suffering occasioned by chronic illness; however, it has been difficult for nursing to mobilise coordinated action in prioritising a re-balance of health systems to better serve those with chronic conditions.
The advent of medical assistance in dying in Canada has shed a spotlight on the implications of the discrepancy between our prioritising patient need in the care and support of patients with conditions such as cancer, in contrast with the supports and services we make available to those with chronic conditions.
Although nursing intimately engages with the burden of chronic illness, it has not mobilized coherent advocacy toward strengthening our societal commitment to this aspect of our care systems.
There is an opportunity for nursing to make a meaningful difference in a fundamental health care system inequity if we can come to understand that chronic illness is as deserving of our collective research, practice change, and policy attention as is cancer.
No patient or public contribution.
To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.
A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.
Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.
Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.
Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.
No patient or public contribution.
The role of the interprofessional evidence-based practice (EBP) mentor is critical to integrate best practices into healthcare and academic environments to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients, families, providers, students, and faculty. This study aimed to validate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes/beliefs (KSAs) needed for the EBP mentor. This role delineation study (RDS) assessed knowledge about the EBP mentor role and tasks as related to the steps and competencies of EBP.
Interprofessional EBP experts participated in an advisory panel. Focus groups were conducted with the advisory panel members to identify the KSAs needed for expert EBP mentors. The steps of EBP were broken into 11 domains to align with the processes and strategies needed for EBP methodology. The focus group data were analyzed to identify the KSAs for each domain. A role delineation survey was developed. Interprofessional experts were invited to complete the survey to validate the KSAs needed for the EBP mentor role. The online survey included demographic information and 11 sections that aligned with the steps of EBP and the 107 KSA items needing to be validated.
A total of 251 interprofessional EBP experts completed the survey (232 nurses, 19 interprofessionals). Healthcare providers comprised 82.5% of the sample, academic/researchers 15.5%, and “worked in both settings” 2%. The results reported strong inter-rater reliability (ranging from 0.836 to 0.955) and strong validity for each of the 11 domains and KSAs.
Findings from this study support the EBP mentor role and will guide interprofessional EBP education and EBP mentor positions in healthcare systems. The study showed that the tasks of the EBP mentor were consistent across settings, educational degrees, and professional roles. Validity for the tasks/role for an interprofessional Evidence-based Practice Certification was clear and outlined expectations for the EBP mentor role.
Palliative care reduces caregiver burden, alleviates patient symptoms, and supports treatment decision-making. However, despite these benefits, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of palliative care interventions for caregivers of individuals with advanced dementia.
To integrate and analyze data on the effectiveness of palliative care interventions in improving caregiver outcomes in order to ensure that both patients and caregivers receive the support necessary for optimal care experiences, quality of life management, and advanced care planning.
A systematic search was conducted of six databases to identify relevant studies published from database inception to 12 December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating palliative care interventions for caregivers of people with advanced dementia were included. Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the methodology of each study. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) between each intervention and control group were calculated. A random-effects DerSimonian and Laird model was applied to generate pooled SMD estimates for each outcome and assess its heterogeneity. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to ensure the stability of the pooled effect sizes.
Eight RCTs were included in the final analysis. Palliative care interventions appeared to reduce conflict in decision-making among caregivers of people with advanced dementia.
Palliative care interventions were successful in reducing conflict in decision-making of caregivers of people with advanced dementia. However, the modality's effects on caregiver satisfaction and caregiver distress need further investigation.
Future palliative care interventions for caregivers of advanced dementia patients should focus on developing the contents of palliative care materials based on evidence-based evaluations and explore strategies to improve engagement between patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
To examine clinical nurses' attitudes towards and self-reported experiences of family nursing in Japan following the relaxation of COVID-19 visitation restrictions. Particular attention is paid to early career nurses whose formative training occurred during visitation bans. The study focused on nurses' negative perceptions and emotional burdens associated with family involvement.
A quantitative-dominant mixed-methods cross-sectional study reported in accordance with the STROBE guideline.
Using a convenience sampling approach, a self-administered, paper-based questionnaire was distributed to clinical nurses in four general hospitals in Japan between January and May 2024. The questionnaire consisted of four parts: demographic and professional background, learning methods related to family nursing, 17 items including negatively valenced statements adapted from the Families' Importance in Nursing Care–Nurses' Attitudes (FINC-NA) scale, and one open-ended question. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests, and qualitative responses were thematically analysed.
Of 1921 nurses invited, 957 responded (response rate: 49.8%), and data from 892 valid responses were analysed. Overall, the nurses demonstrated positive recognition of family nursing as a professional value but also reported lingering emotional burdens and practical challenges when interacting with families. Early-career nurses who began practice during the pandemic showed greater uncertainty and lower affective engagement. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: relational disruption, emotional stress, moral conflict, reappraisal of family engagement and ongoing barriers.
The findings underscore the need to structurally and educationally reintegrate families into nursing care. Simulation-based training, clear institutional policies and hybrid communication models are essential to rebuild relational continuity and support nurses' emotional and ethical capacity for family nursing.
The findings highlight the need to structurally and educationally reintegrate families into clinical care to address the emotional burden and ambivalence reported by nurses. Organisational support—such as clear visitation policies, simulation-based education and reflective opportunities—can help rebuild nurses' relational competence and confidence in engaging with families. Creating supportive learning environments, including on-the-job mentoring and team-based reflection, may further facilitate the restoration of family nursing.
This study addressed how prolonged COVID-19 visitation restrictions disrupted family nursing practice in Japan, created generational differences in nurses' competencies, and shaped nurses' perceptions of family involvement. Nurses reported emotional strain, feelings of being monitored and lack of time when families were present. Early career nurses showed lower relational engagement, while experienced nurses expressed moral distress. ‘Latent indifference’ was also noted. The findings provide valuable insights for healthcare organisations, nurse educators and policymakers by informing strategies to reintegrate families into patient care, improve discharge planning and strengthen training models.
The STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
To examine the relationship between nurse managers' empowering leadership, nurses' resilience and organisational learning from incidents.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Secondary data from a study conducted in June–July 2022 was used. The sample included 1049 nurses working in three special-functioning hospitals. The self-administered questionnaires assessed nurse managers' empowering behaviours, nurses' resilience and attitudes and behaviours fostering organisational learning from incidents. The analysis employed multilevel analysis with hierarchical linear modelling.
Nurse managers' empowering behaviours and nurses' resilience were significantly positively associated with attitudes and behaviours fostering organisational learning from the following incident subscales: make efforts to identify the problem, discuss safety in the workplace, identify and give feedback to address the at-risk behaviour. The interaction of empowering behaviours and resilience was not significant.
Nurse managers' empowering behaviours and nurses' resilience can contribute to attitudes and behaviours that foster organisational learning, even when nurses face stressful incidents.
Fostering empowering leadership in nurse managers and resilience in nurses enhances organisational learning and improves safety and care quality.
The reporting is based on the STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To explore nurses' experiences of the adoption, implementation, and use of digital technologies during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK.
A qualitative descriptive study.
A qualitative study using two data sources: qualitative responses from 55 respondents to an online survey, and data from in-depth interviews with 21 individuals. The NASSS framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
Respondents reported using a variety of technologies including video conferencing applications, telemonitoring, systems to support care management and telecommunication systems. The analysis identified a range of reasons why technology had been introduced into services, and a recognition of its value in a situation where otherwise care may not have been able to continue. During the pandemic nurses were expected to change their work practices very rapidly, and we identified situations where organisational infrastructure either supported this effectively or created additional burdens for the nurses' work.
Nurses had to adapt to new ways of working rapidly, with digital technology being one of the primary means through which communication and care were delivered. The Covid-19 pandemic provided a unique set of circumstances where layers of governance and many of the existing barriers to technology introduction were reduced.
It is important to learn from these experiences, to understand how to sustain innovations that have proved to be successful, as well as the factors that enable nurses to work effectively in this new environment.
This study adheres to the guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.
A public contributor was involved from the beginning of the study conceptualization. They had input into the study approach, were part of the team that acquired the funding for the study and gave input at various stages into the processes for data collection, analysis and writing up the findings. The public contributor is a co-author on this paper and has been involved in the writing and editing of this report.
To investigate the current status of workplace spirituality and moral resilience among clinical nurses and to explore the relationship between these two factors, thereby providing a reference for developing strategies to enhance nurses' moral resilience.
A cross-sectional survey design.
From February to April 2025, a convenience sampling method was used to select 1680 nurses from ten hospitals in the Pingliang area of China. Data were collected using the general data questionnaire, Workplace Spirituality Scale(WSS). Furthermore, the relationship between workplace spirituality and moral resilience was analyzed.
A total of 1657 valid questionnaires were ultimately recovered, yielding an effective response rate of 98.63%. The mean score for workplace spirituality was 102.36 ± 21.65, and the mean score for moral resilience was 41.76 ± 6.31, both indicating a moderate level. A significant positive correlation was found between the two variables (r = 0.231, p < 0.05). Multivariate linear stepwise regression analysis revealed that monthly income, department, monthly night shifts, and workplace spirituality scores were significant predictors of moral resilience (p < 0.05).
The moral resilience of clinical nurses is at a moderate level. Enhancing workplace spirituality can contribute to improving their moral resilience.
To contextualise an existing suicide prevention programme, and to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the contextualised suicide prevention programme among secondary school students in eastern Nepal.
A multi-method study is planned across four phases. The study will be informed by the Socio-Ecological Model. The first phase is a systematic review to identify available suicide prevention programmes, their effects and their contextualisation status. The second phase will be a descriptive qualitative study to contextualise the safeTALK suicide prevention programme for use among adolescents in a public school of Eastern Nepal, involving adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. The third phase will be a single-group pre-post-test design to test the preliminary effects of the contextualised safeTALK programme among 110 adolescents at the public school. Outcomes measured in the third study will be suicidal ideation and help-seeking behaviours, using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale, and General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. The final phase will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the safeTALK suicide prevention programme through in-depth interviews with adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences v.30 and NVivo v.14 respectively.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee and the Nepal Health Research Council. The findings will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
There are no reported structured suicide prevention programmes for adolescents in low-middle-income countries, including Nepal. This study is expected to assist in mitigating the shortfall of contextualised adolescent suicide prevention programmes in low-middle-income countries. Additionally, evidence will be added to the global nursing literature, helping to contribute to evidence-based nursing practice.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12624000634572
This study aimed to explore and describe the experiences and perceptions of mothers of children with leukaemia regarding the transition of care from hospital to home.
A qualitative content analysis with a conventional approach was employed, and this report follows the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.
Thirteen mothers of children with leukaemia were recruited using purposive sampling from two Iranian paediatric hospitals. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted between 2023 and 2024 and analysed using conventional qualitative content analysis.
Drowning in the Vortex of Fear and Doubt emerged as the central theme, encapsulating the shared experiences of mothers of children with leukaemia. This overarching theme comprised five categories: (1) Fear of Unpredictable and Life-Threatening Complications, (2) Paradoxical Concerns About Discharge, (3) Doubts and Hopelessness About Treatment Effectiveness, (4) Stress Regarding the Child's Future Life Trajectory and (5) Sense of Helplessness in Alleviating the Child's Suffering.
The findings underscore the need to provide comprehensive supportive services for parents of children with leukaemia. Policymakers and healthcare teams should prioritise initiatives that enhance parental awareness, deliver psychosocial support and empower families to navigate the arduous path of care and treatment with greater trust and confidence.
Ensuring the well-being and comfort of both the child with cancer and the parents throughout the treatment process is essential for improving care outcomes.
The study is reported according to the COREQ.
Mothers of children with leukaemia participated as interviewees and contributed to ensuring the rigour of the study through data validation.
To offer a comprehensive overview of the individual and organisational factors related to inclusive leadership among healthcare professionals.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
The review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Findings were synthesised using meta-analysis, a random effects model and narrative synthesis.
In January 2025, a systematic search was conducted with no time or geographical limits in the CINAHL, MEDLINE (PubMed), Mednar, ProQuest and Scopus databases. Studies in English, Swedish and Finnish were included.
A total of 34 studies were included. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between inclusive leadership and psychological safety among healthcare professionals (n = 10). The narrative synthesis further identified individual and organisational factors related to inclusive leadership. Individual factors consisted of well-being at work, performance and productivity, social behaviour, innovativeness and creativity and psychological capacity. Organisational factors revealed work community cohesion and citizenship, as well as organisational fairness and appreciation.
Inclusive leadership is a promising leadership behaviour, with positive outcomes for healthcare professionals and organisations. By enhancing psychological safety, inclusive leadership offers broader benefits for individuals and organisations. As such, it could improve the retention of professionals and the attractiveness of organisations in the healthcare sector.
To strengthen the functioning of healthcare organisations, leaders should be educated in inclusive leadership and its practical benefits. Training should focus on developing inclusive leadership behaviours that foster belonging, value individual uniqueness and encourage participation across all professional groups, creating an environment where both individuals and organisations can thrive.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to report the results.
No patient or public contribution.
The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024503861)
(1) Explore the role of core abdominal exercise in people living with a stoma in Australia; (2) determine whether the presence of a parastomal hernia influenced participant symptoms and complications, health status, experiences with different types of exercise, recall advice given by healthcare professionals; (3) determine whether there is an appetite for supervised/supported exercise programs.
A cross-sectional, anonymous survey.
Between August and September 2022. The survey included Likert scales and a single free text response. Logistic regression and Cramer's V were used to explore relationships between variables.
Approximately half (45.5%) of 105 participants reported a parastomal hernia. Those with a parastomal hernia were less likely to recall having received advice (15.20%) or demonstration (9.40%) pertaining to exercise. Less than a quarter of all participants completed strengthening (23.80%) or vigorous (22.90%) exercise. Fear of vigorous exercise, abdominal exercise and heavy lifting were high in both groups. Relationships between healthcare advice, exercise-related fears and avoidance of heavy lifting were observed.
Many Australians living with a stoma are not achieving physical activity recommendations. While exercise behaviours did not differ between people with and without a parastomal hernia, recall of healthcare advice around exercise did. Fear-avoidance relationships were observed.
Most people living with a stoma do not recall advice about core abdominal exercises. Healthcare practitioners need to be aware of fear-avoidance related to lifting among people living with a stoma. This was the first study in Australia, exploring perspectives and experiences regarding exercise; providing foundations for future research particularly exercise programs.
This study adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and the reporting of survey studies (CROSS).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To examine older persons' experiences and participation in life-enhancement activities in a long-term care facility.
Convergent mixed-methods design.
Naturalistic observations of 20 life-enhancement activity sessions were conducted in a single long-term care facility that includes 111 older persons in September 2024. Data were collected through guiding questions and fieldnotes for systematic observation. We used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests for quantitative analysis. Fieldnotes were analyzed using a six-phase reflexive thematic analysis approach.
Engagement levels (self-initiative, assistance-seeking frequency, and social interaction frequency) significantly differed across 16 different life-enhancement activities. Social interaction frequency also varied by mobility status (wheelchair, walker, independent). Participants displayed significantly more distractions in the TV Room than in the Activity Room. Four themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) participation barriers, (2) activity contextual factors, (3) facilitator support strategies, and (4) social interactions and emotional well-being.
Structural elements (purposefully designed rooms, activity design and complexity, and the resident-preferred music), relational elements (facilitators' hands-on support, conflict resolution, and positive reinforcement), and individual factors (mobility status) influence older persons' participation in life-enhancement activities. Life-enhancement activities benefit older persons when they are provided with choices and adaptive equipment.
Findings support allocating distraction-free spaces for life-enhancement activities, incorporating resident-preferred music and game-layered physical exercises, and providing facilitator training in adaptive coaching, hands-on support, and conflict resolution.
Life-enhancement programs can promote psychosocial well-being among older persons in long-term care facilities by transforming routine recreational activities into personalized and socially engaging experiences that may reduce feelings of loneliness.
Journal Article Reporting Standards for Mixed Methods Research.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
The purpose of this scoping review is to map and summarise the current peer-reviewed literature on inequities in doctoral nursing education, with a specific focus on populations affected, barriers, facilitators and strategies to support equity in doctoral nursing education.
This scoping review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
A comprehensive search for empirical evidence was completed using four databases: CINAHL, Scopus, ERIC and Google Scholar. A systematic screening process was applied, and data were extracted and charted guided by the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework.
Databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025.
A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies focused on racial/ethnic minoritized populations, and one focused on first-generation doctoral students. Common barriers included experiences of microaggression, systemic racism, lack of funding and feelings of isolation. Common facilitators were faculty mentorship, financial support, peer networks and targeted recruitment programs.
Inequities remain in doctoral nursing education, particularly for racial/ethnic minoritized populations. Although some effective interventions were identified, significant gaps exist in understanding how to support diverse doctoral nursing students, especially for those with intersecting identities.
Addressing inequities in doctoral nursing education can enhance the diversity of the nursing workforce and faculty, promote inclusive academic environments and contribute to health equity.
Persistent inequities in access and experience among underrepresented groups in doctoral nursing education. Main findings: Key structural and social barriers persist, though several promising strategies have emerged. Impact area: Academic institutions, doctoral program designers and nurse leaders.
This study adheres to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a Nurse Practitioner led procedural support service for children with procedural anxiety, and identify facilitators and barriers to its sustained implementation and optimisation.
An effectiveness–implementation hybrid type 3 study used a prospective mixed methods evaluation approach.
From December 2022 to May 2023, data were collected from children, parents and clinicians using a nurse practitioner-led service at a quaternary paediatric hospital in Brisbane, Australia. A prospective audit assessed clinical outcomes, while qualitative interviews explored implementation barriers and facilitators.
The clinical audit (n = 40) confirmed the service was effective and safe, ensuring procedural completion with minimal distress. Descriptive statistics indicated low pain and anxiety scores. There was a moderate negative relationship between pain scores and the use of distraction techniques. Interviews with thirty-three participants showed the service improved access to procedural care, reduced the need for physical restraint and general anaesthesia, and enhanced clinical workflow through preadmission assessments.
Utilising a Nurse Practitioner support service represents a safe and effective strategy to enhance access for paediatric patients with procedural anxiety.
This study underscores the significance of specialised nursing roles in managing paediatric procedural anxiety, offering a replicable model to enhance procedural outcomes and mitigate medical trauma across healthcare settings.
Minimising pain and distress is important in all clinical encounters with children to reduce the risk of medical-related trauma and the future avoidance of healthcare.
The report of study outcomes was guided by the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative.
Patients or the public were not included in the design, conduct or reporting of the study.
This work aimed to explore barriers to pessary self-management and co-create strategies to address these.
Participatory Action Research.
In October 2024, eight pessary-using women living in the United Kingdom participated in cooperative inquiry, discussion and co-creation of strategies in two virtual workshops.
Pessary using women who participated in this research identified challenges affecting willingness to self-manage a pessary and proposed solutions to address these and better support women. Pessary practitioners should assess physical capabilities, consider softer, more malleable pessaries, and explore the possibility of a pessary applicator. Peer support was seen as empowering, enabling self-advocacy and improved care; therefore, establishing peer networks was prioritised. Major barriers included difficulty navigating services and limited access to a full range of pessaries, leading some women to buy devices online without medical oversight, creating a two-tier system based on ability to pay. The group called for improved, standardised pessary care, and for self-management to be reframed to avoid women feeling ‘fobbed off’ through better follow-up, positive language, and compassionate care.
The group identified strategies to address barriers to pessary self-management which require further exploration. Pessary practitioners have a responsibility to listen to these voices and take steps to improve care for women in the future.
To support women's willingness to self-manage their pessary, pessary practitioners should consider and support women to overcome physical and emotional barriers; improve information provision; maximise social support; boost women's perceived self-efficacy; reframe pessary self-management and ensure robust, accessible follow-up is in place. This will ensure pessary-using women are supported to make an informed decision about pessary self-management. This research offers pessary practitioners insight into barriers women perceive to pessary self-management and guidance as to how women can be supported to self-manage their pessary.
Only 21% of women are willing to self-manage their pessary. Therefore, this research aimed to co-create strategies to better support women to self-manage their pessary and overcome barriers to willingness. Women reported individual, societal and service factors which affect willingness to self-manage a pessary. These research findings should be translated into clinical practice and care delivery for pessary using women in both a community and hospital setting.
COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist.
Patients and members of the public were involved in research prioritization, study design, data analysis, interpretation of findings and dissemination.
Study not registered.
To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Forensic Nursing Competency Scale-Short Form (FNCS-SF) for hospital nurses.
Nurses who care for victims of sexual abuse, domestic violence and elder or child abuse require forensic nursing competencies. However, few valid and reliable tools exist to assess these competencies in hospital settings.
A cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 involved the development and refinement of the FNCS-SF with input from 10 nurses. Phase 2 tested the tool's psychometric properties. A total of 420 nurses from two tertiary hospitals in South Korea participated. Participants were divided into two groups: Study 1 (n = 200) for exploratory factor analysis and Study 2 (n = 220) for confirmatory factor analysis.
The FNCS-SF consists of 27 items across six factors: awareness of the medicolegal problem, evidence-based practice in forensic nursing, collaborative forensic nursing with community partners, safety and security, professional career development and multidisciplinary integrated knowledge. An item analysis revealed significant correlations between each item and the total scale score. Criterion validity was supported by significant correlations between the FNCS-SF and attitudes and beliefs towards forensic nursing and the performance of the forensic nursing role. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a six-factor model with good fit indices. Cronbach's alpha indicated strong internal consistency.
The FNCS-SF is a valid and reliable tool for assessing hospital nurses' forensic nursing competencies, which can improve patient safety and treatment outcomes. Further validation in diverse clinical settings is recommended.
The FNCS-SF can be used to improve forensic nursing competency through professional development.
None.
The FNCS-SF provides a standardised framework to evaluate nurses' forensic competency, guiding education and practice to enhance clinical preparedness and deliver victim-centred care.
STROBE guidelines.
To characterise and analyse doctoral programmes in nursing in Latin America through an exhaustive review of the official websites of the universities.
Descriptive and multiple correspondence analysis. Existing programmes were mapped out, identifying their geographic distribution and curricular characteristics.
A review of 59 doctoral programmes in nursing was conducted through the official web portals of universities in Latin America that were currently available (as of 2025) and that provided the required information. Thereafter, a matrix was built in Excel to consolidate the data.
The study identified an increase in the number of doctoral programmes in nursing offered in Latin America. Furthermore, these programmes were found to be more strongly concentrated in countries such as Brazil, Peru and Mexico, while other countries, including Guatemala and Uruguay, have recently incorporated such training.
Doctoral education in nursing in Latin America has experienced significant growth in recent years, consolidating itself as a fundamental pillar for the development of the discipline and the generation of knowledge in health. However, structural challenges persist, including limited funding for research, a lack of cooperation between universities, and the absence of programmes focused on Advanced Nursing Practice.
This contribution helps identify trends in the offering of doctoral programmes and inequalities in their geographic distribution, allowing for an understanding of how training varies across countries in the region while also consolidating Nursing as an academic and professional discipline.
FreshRSS 