The growing complexity of global health issues underscores the need for a skilled workforce, achievable through competency-based training (competency-based curricula, CBC) that integrates knowledge and practice. Starting from 2022, medical and nursing CBC were harmonised across universities in Tanzania to ensure all graduates attain nationally defined core competencies. The reform aligned programme structure, learning outcomes and assessment methods to promote consistency and interprofessional collaboration. However, questions remain about whether harmonisation alone can ensure the development of practical clinical competencies among students. This study explored the experiences of medical and nursing faculty and students in implementing clinical training as a component of CBC in two health training institutions in Tanzania.

An exploratory qualitative case study was conducted with 67 participants, using 8 in-depth interviews with administrators and 8 focus group discussions with faculty and students. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic approach.

Two private, faith-based medical universities in the United Republic of Tanzania.

The study purposefully recruited a total of 67 participants. The participants included university administrators (including Deputy Vice Chancellors for Academics, quality assurance officers and deans), medical and nursing faculty and students (fourth-year medical and third-year nursing students).

Two main themes emerged: challenges in implementing clinical training and strategies used to enforce clinical training. Key challenges included curriculum design gaps, inadequate faculty and clinical instructors, a large number of students and a shortage of hospital staff. Strategies used were utilisation of clinical skills and simulation laboratories, involvement of non-academic clinical specialists’ staff, use of student-centred learning methodologies and leveraging regional, district and specialised private hospitals for clinical teaching.

Despite notable challenges in clinical training, the institutions in this study have implemented proactive strategies to support clinical training. Based on the findings, stakeholders should invest in increasing faculty and clinical instructors and expanding clinical placements to regional, district and private hospitals.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder, with symptom variation between patients.

We describe clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with PTSD based on real-world data.

This non-interventional, retrospective cohort study analysed de-identified electronic health records of patients from the Holmusk NeuroBlu database in the USA. Patients with ≥2 PTSD diagnoses captured in the database within 30 days between 2001 and 2020 were included. The index date was defined as the date of the first recorded PTSD diagnosis. In patients who were aged ≥18 years, demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline (index date ±14 days), in the 6 months prior to baseline and 12 months after baseline were described. Patients were stratified into four mutually exclusive subgroups according to treatment received: psychotherapy only, pharmacotherapy only, psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and untreated. Natural language processing models were used to derive PTSD symptoms from unstructured clinician-documented mental state examination data. Data were analysed descriptively.

A total of 37,449 patients had ≥2 PTSD diagnoses within 30 days between 2001 and 2020; 32,875 patients received care at clinical sites with both inpatient/outpatient units; 25,507 patients received psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy as per further prespecified criteria, and 17,234 were ≥18 years old and included in this analysis. Most patients (84.9%) received psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy or both during the first year post-baseline. Mean age (SD) was 37.7 (12.4) years, 73.4% of patients were female and 59.6% were White. At baseline, 98% of patients had ≥1 psychiatric comorbidity; major depressive disorder (42.2%), substance use disorder (35%) and anxiety disorder (30.7%) were most frequently reported. Reported suicidal ideation/attempts were most frequent in the pharmacotherapy only group compared with other subgroups at baseline. The most frequently prescribed drug classes were antidepressants (51.8%), second-generation antipsychotics (29.9%) and anxiolytics (23.3%) at baseline. Trazodone, clonazepam, quetiapine and sertraline were the most frequently prescribed medications.

In the overall study population, most patients were female, with a high prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities. Demographic and clinical characteristics observed in this study varied across treatment subgroups. These insights may support patient-specific treatment planning and inform health-economic decision models in PTSD.

The aim of this study was to prioritise a set of indicators to measure World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-care standards for small and/or sick newborns (SSNB) in health facilities. The hypothesis is that monitoring prioritised indicators can support accountability mechanisms, assess and drive progress, and compare performance in quality-of-care (QoC) at subnational levels.

Prospective, iterative, deductive, stepwise process to prioritise a list of QoC indicators organised around the WHO Standards for improving the QoC for small and sick newborns in health facilities. A technical working group (TWG) used an iterative four-step deductive process: (1) articulation of conceptual framework and method for indicator development; (2) comprehensive review of existing global SSNB-relevant indicators; (3) development of indicator selection criteria; and (4) selection of indicators through consultations with a wide range of stakeholders at country, regional and global levels.

The indicators are prioritised for inpatient newborn care (typically called level 2 and 3 care) in high mortality/morbidity settings, where most preventable poor neonatal outcomes occur.

The TWG included 24 technical experts and leaders in SSNB QoC programming selected by WHO. Global perspectives were synthesised from an online survey of 172 respondents who represented different countries and levels of the health system, and a wide range of perspectives, including ministries of health, research institutions, technical and implementing partners, health workers and independent experts.

The 30 prioritised SSNB QoC indicators include 27 with metadata and 3 requiring further development; together, they cover all eight standard domains of the WHO quality framework. Among the established indicators, 10 were adopted from existing indicators and 17 adapted. The list contains a balance of indicators measuring inputs (n=6), processes (n=12) and outcome/impact (n=9).

The prioritised SSNB QoC indicators can be used at health facility, subnational and national levels, depending on the maturity of a country’s health information system. Their use in implementation, research and evaluation across diverse contexts has the potential to help drive action to improve quality of SSNB care. WHO and others could use this list for further prioritisation of a core set.

There is limited evidence on how to effectively treat individuals from marginalised populations with dependence on amphetamine and/or methamphetamine (collectively referred to hereafter as amphetamine dependence). The disease burden is extremely high in this population, especially related to psychiatric comorbidities, cardiovascular complications, injection-related infections and poor social functioning. ATLAS4Dependence is a multi-centre randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial that will investigate the effectiveness and safety of substitution treatment with dextroamphetamine compared with placebo in people with amphetamine dependence.

The trial will recruit 226 adult patients in several outpatient clinics in Norway.Inclusion criteria comprise individuals with amphetamine dependence, defined as use on three or more days per week during the past 28 days, who currently inject or have formerly injected drugs. This includes individuals both with and without comorbid opioid dependence, as well as those currently receiving or not receiving opioid agonist treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either dextroamphetamine or placebo for 12 weeks. Flexible doses within the range of 30–120 mg daily will be provided based on individual assessments. The participants in both arms will be offered standard psychosocial and medical follow-up in accordance with current clinical practice. The endpoint assessments will be conducted at 12 weeks with weekly self-reports and safety assessments and a follow-up assessment at 52 weeks. The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of 12 weeks daily prescribed oral dextroamphetamine versus placebo on the use of illicit amphetamines as well as on the total amount of amphetamines used (including both illicit and prescribed sources). Secondary outcomes are the differences between the groups at 12 weeks regarding psychological distress, symptoms of psychosis, quality of life, cardiovascular risk factors, injection-related infections, executive functioning, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder-related symptoms, sleep, violence risk, fatigue, symptoms of craving and withdrawal, treatment retention, days of use of illicit amphetamines and use at 4 weeks and 8 weeks during the intervention period, use of other illicit substances and alcohol, as well as a cost-effectiveness analysis (using private economy, criminal activity and health service utilisation) and a qualitative approach to assess overall experiences with the study intervention. Analysis and reporting will follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. All tests will be two-sided. Descriptive results and the estimated effectiveness will be presented with 95% CIs. The difference between the groups at the primary time point (at the end of the 12-week trial) will be assessed using ² test (for use of illicit amphetamines measured by monthly urine tests) and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) (for weekly self-reported total amount of amphetamines). Analyses for the primary endpoint will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis and reported on as such, but sensitivity analyses with per protocol analyses will also be presented.

The study is approved by European Medicines Agency, Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

CTIS 2023-510404-44-00.

To estimate the healthcare costs associated with post-stroke dysphagia during acute hospitalisation and to identify factors influencing these costs in a tertiary hospital setting in Vietnam.

A cross-sectional study using clinical and billing data from hospital records.

The study was conducted at the Neurology Center of Bach Mai Hospital, a tertiary care facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, between June 2020 and January 2022.

A total of 951 patients aged ≥18 years with acute ischaemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI were included. Dysphagia was assessed using the Gugging Swallowing Screen.

Direct healthcare costs during hospitalisation were collected from the hospital billing system and categorised as medications, diagnostic imaging, medical supplies, accommodation, food, procedures and laboratory tests. All costs were converted to USD. Associations between patient characteristics and total healthcare costs were analysed using generalised linear models (Gamma distribution with log link), applying robust standard errors.

The median treatment cost was 10.08 million VND (436.24 USD) in the dysphagia group vs 6.37 million VND (275.78 USD) in the non-dysphagia group. Costs increased with dysphagia severity, reaching 22.64 million VND (979.49 USD) among patients with severe dysphagia. In multivariate analysis, dysphagia was associated with a 21% increase in costs (exp(β) = 1.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.33; p14, pneumonia, prolonged hospitalisation and higher educational level.

Post-stroke dysphagia substantially increases acute hospitalisation costs in Vietnam. Early screening, standardised management and preventive care for complications may improve outcomes and reduce costs.

The study was registered on the Research Registry website (https://www.researchregistry.com/) under the unique identification number: researchregistry8203.

Radiological imaging is a central facet of the multidisciplinary evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Current guidelines for the imaging of suspected child physical abuse are often unclear, incomplete and highly variable regarding recommendations on critical questions, thereby risking clinical heterogeneity, unstructured decision-making and missed diagnoses. We, therefore, aim to develop and report an evidence-based and consensus-derived international guideline for the radiological investigation of index and contact children in the context of suspected physical abuse and to ascertain areas of scientific uncertainty to inform future research priorities.

The international guidelines for the imaging investigation of suspected child physical abuse (IGISPA) consensus group includes formal representation from 127 recognised experts across 14 subspecialties, six continents and 32 national and/or international organisations. Participants will be divided into five longitudinal subgroups (indications for imaging, skeletal imaging, visceral imaging, neuroimaging and postmortem imaging) with three cross-cutting themes (radiography, genetics and adaptations for low- and lower-middle-income countries). Each subgroup will develop preliminary consensus statements via integration of current evidence-based guidelines, systematic literature review and the clinical expertise of a multinational group of experts. Statements will then undergo anonymised voting in a modified e-Delphi process and iterative revision until consensus (≥80% agreement) is achieved. Final statements will undergo both internal and external peer review prior to endorsement.

As an anonymous survey of consenting healthcare professionals, this study did not require ethical approval. Experts provided written informed consent to participate prior to commencement of the modified Delphi process. The IGISPA consensus statement and any subsequent guidance will be published open access in peer-reviewed medical journals.

Health advocacy (HA) is acknowledged as a core competence in medical education. However, varying and sometimes conflicting conceptualisations of HA exist, making it challenging to integrate the competence consistently. While this diversity highlights the need for a deeper understanding of HA conceptualisations, a comprehensive analysis across the continuum of medical education is absent in the literature. This protocol has been developed to clarify the conceptual dimensions of the HA competence in literature as applied to medical education.

The review will be conducted in line with the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive literature search was developed and already carried out in eight academic databases and Google Scholar, without restrictions on publication date, geography or language. Articles that describe the HA role among students and physicians who receive or provide medical education will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will independently complete title and abstract screening prior to full-text review of selected articles and data extraction on the final set. A descriptive-analytical approach will be applied for summarising the data.

This scoping review does not involve human participants, as all evidence is sourced from publicly available databases. Therefore, ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through submission to a high-quality peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences. By clarifying the conceptualisations of HA, this review aims to contribute to a shared narrative that will strengthen the foundation for integrating the HA role into medical education.

A preliminary version of this protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework on 9 December 2024, and can be accessed at the following link: https://osf.io/ed2br. We have also registered our scoping review protocol as a preprint at medRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.09.24318699.

Diabetes is already known as a risk factor for developing dementia. Multiple factors contribute to this association: presence of microvascular and macrovascular complications, chronic inflammation, hyperglycaemia, hypoglycaemia and hyperinsulinemia.1

Older adult patients often present with multimorbidities, polypharmacy, malnutrition, sarcopenia, longer duration of diabetes and renal and hepatic dysfunction. Furthermore, low education level, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, obstructive...