To conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis to identify barriers, facilitators and pre-existing interventions and describe the current status of initiatives/interventions aimed at improving access to quality trauma healthcare after injury in Pakistan.

Systematic review and narrative synthesis

MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Cochrane (Wiley), Scopus and ProQuest, as well as grey literature.

Full-text peer-reviewed publications, including cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, case-control studies, randomised controlled trials and qualitative studies published in English from January 2013 to December 2023.

Two independent reviewers used a standardised tool to extract data variables to Excel. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the CASP checklist. The barriers, facilitators and pre-existing interventions were mapped using the four delays framework, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domains and the WHO health systems building blocks. The data were synthesised narratively to improve access to quality trauma care in Pakistan. This review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines.

The review included 20 studies. 19 studies reported 58 barriers to access to quality care. Six studies reported 20 facilitators, and eight studies described initiatives or interventions aimed at improving access to quality trauma healthcare after injury. According to the four delays framework, the receiving care stage of access to care was primarily studied in 16 studies, which identified 37 barriers and 13 facilitators across 5 studies. Regarding the quality of care according to IOM domains, the effectiveness of quality trauma care after an injury was studied in 15 studies, which identified 19 barriers and 10 facilitators across four studies. According to the WHO health system building blocks, most studies (n=15) described challenges in healthcare service delivery, with these 15 studies identifying 23 barriers and 3 studies identifying 4 facilitators.

Our findings highlighted the scarcity of available literature, identified barriers and facilitators and pre-existing interventions, which informed the need to develop feasible, sustainable and contextually relevant interventions to improve access to quality trauma care after injury in Pakistan.

CRD42024545786

To identify the assessments, diagnostic criteria and outcome measures reported in peer-reviewed literature for children with growing pains and persistent lower limb pain in the presence of restless leg syndrome (RLS).

Scoping review completed in line with Joanna Briggs Institute methodological guidance

Five online databases were searched—MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and AMED—for records up to 14 October 2024.

Records reporting on the use of assessments, diagnostic criteria or outcome measures in children (aged 0–18 years) with growing pains or persistent lower limb pain in the presence of RLS. Articles were required to have a sample size of ≥10 and be available in English language.

Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed using descriptive statistics.

Following review of 19 806 records, 61 unique records were included. Most were observational cross-sectional or case–control designs. Assessments were varied and primarily focused on body functions and pain characteristics rather than activities and participation. There were 15 unique diagnostic criteria reported for growing pains with limited consistency and sometimes conflict between included items. Outcomes measures were only reported in eight records and typically measured pain presence and intensity.

Assessment and subsequent diagnosis of growing pains and persistent pain in the presence of RLS lack consistency. Outcome measures were seldom used as most records were not designed to measure change over time. Standardised practices for assessment and management of these conditions may benefit clinicians and optimise patient care.

Many people with long-term conditions such as pain and arthritis struggle with their health and well-being. To support better self-management, a new peer-delivered coaching intervention (Health Connect Coaching) was set up at a National Health Service integrated care organisation in Southwest England. Based on principles of personalised care and supported goal setting, the one-to-one coaching programme, targeting patients with low activation, delivered coaching sessions in a step-down approach over 6 months. A randomised controlled feasibility trial (fRCT) of Health Connect Coaching was conducted to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial. This article reports the embedded qualitative component of the fRCT, describing the experiences of coaches, peers and staff of implementing and participating in the intervention and trial that ultimately struggled to recruit sufficient peers.

Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with coaches (n=16) and peers (n=6), and informal discussions held with staff (n=7). Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and summaries of informal discussions were made. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

Four themes were identified from the interview and discussion data: (1) motivation for participation, (2) balance, (3) flexibility and (4) connection and building relationships.

One-to-one peer coaching demonstrates potential as an intervention to enable people to better manage their chronic health condition. However, in people with low activation, programmes and effectiveness studies need to pay close attention in their design to the motivation of peers, flexible delivery models that enable connection but can accommodate fluctuating needs and facilitating links between coaching services and clinical teams.

ISRCTN12623577.

To assess the comparative effectiveness of educational interventions in neurological disease for healthcare workers and students.

Systematic review.

Medline, Embase and Cochrane through to 1 June 2025.

Studies evaluating neurological disease educational interventions with a comparator group (observational cohort/randomised controlled trial (RCT)) were included.

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42023461838). Knowledge acquisition and educational methodologies were collected from each study. Study outcomes were classified using the Kirkpatrick and Kirkpatrick four-level model (learner reaction, knowledge acquisition, behavioural change, clinical outcome).¹ Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs.^{2 3}

A total of 67 studies involving 4728 participants were included. Of these, 36 were RCTs, and 31 were observational studies. Virtual interventions were the most common (67.2%, n=45 studies), primarily targeting either medical students (46.3%, n=31 studies) or specialists (40.3%, n=27 studies). Overall, 70.1% (n=47) of studies demonstrated outcomes in favour of the intervention. However, few studies used K&K level 3/4 outcomes, with two studies evaluating behaviour change (level 3) and three assessing clinical outcomes (level 4 combined with other levels). No study exclusively assessed level 4 outcomes. Meta-analysis of 22 RCTs with calculable standardised mean differences (SMDs) (n=1748) showed a significant benefit of interventions (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.27, p=0.0056).

This review highlights a growing body of research particularly focusing on virtual techniques, specialist audiences and treatment-oriented content. Few studies assessed changes in practice or patient care. Non-specialists remain underrepresented. Future studies should prioritise assessing the clinical impact of educational interventions within non-specialist audiences.

The National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) currently involves a healthcare professional collecting a cervical sample in a healthcare setting. This method of screening has barriers associated with access to screening appointments and the poor acceptability of the speculum examination. Primary screening through HPV testing has led to the development of self-sampling screening methods including vaginal and urine self-sampling, with many UK studies comparing these screening methods with the current NHSCSP. It is not known what features of self-sampling influence individuals’ preferences and cervical screening uptake. To understand these preferences, we plan to undertake a discrete choice experiment (DCE). This protocol aims to describe the steps taken to design the DCE and the proposed approach to fielding the DCE to identify preferences for different sampling approaches in cervical screening.

An online survey comprising a DCE was designed to understand preferences of individuals for self-sampling methods within the NHSCSP. Attributes and levels for the DCE were generated through an iterative process including a literature review of qualitative studies about self-sampling cervical screening methods, input from cervical screening clinical experts and a patient and public involvement group (n=6). A D-efficient design was used to create choice sets for the DCE survey. Regression-based analysis will be used to estimate the impact of each attribute and level on individual choices.

This study has been approved by The University of Manchester Proportionate Research Ethics Committee (2024-20767-37669). The results of the DCE will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer review journal and the results will be presented at national and international conferences.

There are no data associated with this protocol. The data produced by this study and analysis scripts will be made available in a public repository following publication of the study.

Detecting cancer earlier improves treatment options and long-term survival. A multicancer early detection test that reliably picks up early-stage cancer would potentially save lives and reduce the cost of treating cancer. One promising candidate is the Enlighten test, which applies machine learning to plasma amino acid concentrations to detect cancer. In a cohort of 77 patients recently diagnosed with breast, colorectal, pancreatic or prostate cancer, 60 (78%) were detected by the test (sensitivity), with no false positives in 20 healthy controls. The MODERNISED study will further develop the Enlighten test to detect 10 different cancers by adding bladder, lung, melanoma, oesophageal, ovarian and renal cancer to the test.

MODERNISED (ISRCTN17299125) is a multicentre prospective, non-interventional, case–control study. We aim to recruit 1000 adult participants with a recent cancer diagnosis, 250 adult participants with symptoms of cancer where a cancer diagnosis was ruled out by the National Health Service (NHS) standard of care and 100 healthy adult volunteers. Cancer tissue of origin (ToO) will include bladder, breast, colorectal, lung, melanoma, oesophageal, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate and renal. Participants in the two non-cancer cohorts who are later diagnosed with cancer will be moved to the cancer cases cohort. The primary aim is to train and validate a machine learning algorithm to detect cancer, which will be evaluated by AUROC. Secondary aims include training and validating an algorithm to predict ToO and stage of cancer, exploring differences in performance by demographics and estimating how sensitivity varies across specificity cut-offs of 95%, 99% and 99.9%. These results will provide a statistically powered estimate of how well the Enlighten test can discriminate between individuals with and without cancer, which can then be validated for clinical use in further research.

This study is sponsored by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and has been approved by the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research West Midlands (24/WM/0234). Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in international peer-reviewed journals. Lay summaries of study progress and findings will be published on the Southampton Clinical Trial Unit’s website.

ISRCTN17299125.

This study compared the effectiveness of first-time use of faster aspart with rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D).

This retrospective cohort study used data from 1 January 2017 to 8 May 2021 captured in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in the UK.

Patients with T1D or T2D either initiating faster aspart or another rapid-acting insulin analogue (‘new users’) or switching from a rapid-acting insulin analogue to faster aspart or to another rapid-acting insulin analogue (‘switchers’) were included. The index date was the date of first prescription of faster aspart or a rapid-acting insulin analogue, or of switching to a different rapid-acting analogue or to faster aspart.

A total of 9695 and 2170 patients were included in the new users (T1D, 1737; T2D, 7958) and switchers cohorts (T1D, 1764; T2D, 406), respectively.

Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change at 6 months, occurrence of hypoglycaemia from index to 12 months post-index and treatment persistency from index to discontinuation or censoring.

Numerically greater reductions were observed with faster aspart than rapid-acting insulins in T1D switchers and new users in change in HbA1c at 6 months. Patients with T1D who switched to faster aspart experienced a significant reduction in rate of hypoglycaemia (p=0.0021). Treatment persistency was higher with faster aspart than with rapid-acting insulins among T1D switchers. No distinction in treatment persistency was observed between the treatment groups for T1D new users or T2D switchers.

Reductions in HbA1c were numerically larger with faster aspart in three of four subgroups. There was higher treatment persistency with faster aspart vs rapid-acting insulin analogues among T1D switchers.

NN1218-4967.

Observational data are increasingly used to study and draw causal inferences about the effects of treatments. Target trial emulation (TTE) is a framework for mitigating biases in causal investigations through specification of an observational study, targeting a specific causal research question, based on a real or hypothetical randomised controlled trial. Investigations into the effects of treatment discontinuation are of growing interest and particularly relevant in cystic fibrosis (CF), where treatment burden is high and new transformative therapies are becoming widespread. We aim to use the TTE framework to investigate the effect of discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on clinical outcomes in people with CF. Our observational emulation will be based on the CF WISE (Withdrawal of Inhaled Steroids Evaluation) trial (PMID:16556691).

Two study designs proposed for investigating treatment effects using observational data are the prevalent new-user design and the sequential trials design. Each design uses different but related methods to address similar causal questions; however, the comparability between them remains uncertain. We will conduct a population-based cohort study using data from the UK CF Registry between January 2016 and June 2018 and apply these designs. We will specify the target trial protocol for each study design. Estimates for the causal effects of discontinuing ICS will be obtained and compared with those from the CF-WISE trial.

This study has received approval from the UK CF Registry Research Committee for both the research and access to data. Ethical approval has also been granted by the LSHTM Ethics Committee. The UK CF Registry has NHS Research Ethics Committee approval (REC reference: 24/EE/0012). The findings from this project will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.

The SupportBack 2 randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention supporting self-management versus usual primary care in reducing low back pain (LBP)-related disability. In this study, we aimed to identify and understand key processes and potential mechanisms underlying the impact of the intervention.

This was a nested qualitative process evaluation of the SupportBack 2 RCT (ISRCTN: 14736486 pre-results).

Primary care in the UK (England).

46 trial participants experiencing LBP without indicators of serious spinal pathologies (eg, fractures, infection) took part in telephone interviews at either 3 (n=15), 6 (n=14) or 12 months (n=17) post randomisation. Five physiotherapists who provided telephone support for the internet intervention also took part in telephone interviews.

An internet intervention ‘SupportBack’ supporting self-management of LBP primarily through physical activity and exercise delivered in addition to usual care, with and without physiotherapist telephone support.

Data were analysed thematically, applying a realist logic to develop context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Four explanatory themes were developed, with five context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Where benefit was reported, SupportBack appeared to work by facilitating a central associative process where participants linked increases in physical activity or exercise with improvements in LBP, then continued to use physical activity or exercise as key regulatory strategies. Participants who reported little or no benefit from the intervention appeared to experience several barriers to this associative process, including negative expectations, prohibitive beliefs about the cause of LBP or functional limitations preventing engagement. Physiotherapists appeared to provide accountability and validation for some; however, the remote telephone support that lacked physical assessment was viewed as limiting its potential value.

Digital interventions targeting physical activity and exercise to support LBP self-management may rely on mechanisms that are easily inhibited in complex, heterogeneous populations. Future research should focus on identifying and removing barriers that may limit the effectiveness of digital self-management support for LBP.

Previous trauma and adverse life experiences have been hypothesised to be aetiological factors for functional neurological disorder (FND) leading to the hypothesis of a ‘trauma-subtype’ of FND. Individuals who have experienced prior abuse are more likely to develop FND than healthy controls. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and personality disorders have been described to be comorbid with FND at varying prevalence rates. Complex PTSD (c-PTSD) and emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) have clinical similarities with PTSD and trauma is a common aetiological factor in the development of all three conditions. There is some research exploring the resemblance of personality traits in populations diagnosed with FND and EUPD compared with controls. However, it remains unclear what the current prevalence rates are of PTSD, c-PTSD and EUPD in populations diagnosed with FND. Understanding the overlap between these trauma-based comorbid psychiatric diagnoses with FND will hopefully inform better and more comprehensive trauma-informed treatment strategies. The aims of the systematic review are therefore to (1) establish the prevalence of PTSD, c-PTSD and EUPD in adults diagnosed with FND and (2) compare core FND symptom severity between adults with FND alone and those with comorbid PTSD, c-PTSD and EUPD.

This systematic review will assess the prevalence of PTSD, c-PTSD and EUPD in FND patients aged over 18, diagnosed using standardised questionnaires or clinical interviews as per international diagnostic criteria. Studies will be identified through comprehensive searches of databases including PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus, from May 1990 to May 2025. The review aims to estimate the prevalence of these conditions in FND, with findings presented as a narrative description discussing contributing factors, and a meta-analysis considered if heterogeneity is suitable.

Ethical approval is not required since only data from existing studies will be used and no original data will be collected. Results will be disseminated at national and international academic conferences and in peer-reviewed publications. Any deviations from this protocol will be recorded and explained in the final report and updated on PROSPERO.

CRD42024599112.

Severe aorto-iliac steno-occlusive atherosclerotic disease is a major cause of morbidity and amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. While both open surgical and endovascular revascularisation are standard treatments in this patient group, there is no high-quality randomised evidence to determine which approach offers superior clinical and cost-effectiveness, leading to uncertainty and poor outcomes after intervention.

The EVOCC trial is a national, multicentre, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing open surgery to endovascular revascularisation in patients with symptomatic severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A total of 628 participants across 30 NHS sites in the UK will be randomised 1:1 to receive either open surgery or endovascular (minimally invasive) intervention. The primary outcome is amputation-free survival, defined as time to first event (major lower limb amputation or death). Secondary outcomes include mortality, cardiovascular events, hospital readmissions, re-interventions and quality-of-life measures. An internal pilot phase (10 sites, 6-month duration) will assess recruitment feasibility. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment.

The trial has received ethical approval from a UK Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/SW/0065; trial registration reference: ISRCTN14591444). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

The EVOCC trial is the first RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of open vs endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac disease worldwide. The results will provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice and healthcare policies globally. Results will be disseminated via patient groups, online lay summaries, a trial website, social media, presentations in conferences, a formal scientific publication in a medical journal and direct communications with policymakers across borders.

ISRCTN14591444.

This study aims to develop a methodology to retrieve, harmonise and evaluate the completeness of national body mass index (BMI) data from linked electronic health record (EHR) sources to build a longitudinal research-ready data asset (RRDA).

A longitudinal study of BMI records spanning 23 years (1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022) from four data sources.

The national BMI RRDA is created within the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (Databank), encompassing the entire population of Wales, UK.

We built a methodology that provides a reproducible framework for extracting and harmonising BMI data from four major linked EHRs across two age groups: children and young people (CYP; 2–18 years old) and adults (19 years and older). The methodology is adaptable across different trusted research environments. We evaluated the completeness and retention of records over 1-, 5- and 23-year periods by calculating the proportion of missing data relative to each year’s population.

We retrieved 53.4 million records for 3.2 million individuals across Wales from 1st January 2000 to 31 December 2022. Among these, 3% of CYP and 34% of adults had repeat BMI measurements recorded over periods ranging from 5 to 23 years. Throughout the entire population of Wales during this period, 49% of CYP and 26% of adults had at least one BMI reading recorded, resulting in a missingness rate of 51% for CYP and 74% for adults. Preserving BMI information by retaining the most recently recorded BMI over 1-, 5- and 23-year intervals from 2022 showed coverage rates of 10%, 33% and 68%, respectively, for CYP, and 25%, 51% and 73%, respectively, for adults.

Our findings highlight substantial variations in BMI data availability and retention across CYP and adults, as well as time periods within EHR in Wales. Wider adoption of this approach can enhance standardised approaches in using accessible measures like BMI to assess disease risk in population-based studies, strengthening public health initiatives and research efforts.

Major lower limb amputation, defined as an amputation above the level of the ankle joint, is a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality. Limited data exist on the burden, aetiology and outcomes of major lower limb amputations in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This is despite increasing rates of diabetes, peripheral arterial disease and trauma, with further projected increases in these conditions, which often precede major lower limb amputation. The Regional Assessment of Amputations in sub-Saharan Africa (RAMPs) study aims to address this knowledge gap by performing a multicentre, prospective study of major lower limb amputations across the region.

We describe a prospective, multicentre observational cohort study enrolling patients undergoing major lower limb amputation at hospitals in SSA over a consecutive 6-month period. Consecutive patients will be included, and data will be collected from medical records until discharge, death or 30 days postoperatively, whichever is sooner. The primary outcome is in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include the aetiology of amputations and in-hospital complications. We will also examine systems and processes using a facility survey of each participating centre. The study will collect system-level, patient-level and outcome-level data. Our sample size calculation suggests 904 patients need to be recruited.

The RAMPs study will provide a snapshot of the current outcomes and aetiology of major lower limb amputation in SSA. It will show if variation in outcomes and aetiology in patients in the region exists and provide information on the healthcare processes and systems in those who may be at risk of lower limb amputation. Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Birmingham (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Committee reference: ERN_2929-Jan2025) and the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA Institutional review board reference COSECSA/REC/2025/07). Findings will be disseminated throughout the region at local, national and international conferences and through at least one peer-reviewed manuscript.

School feeding programmes (SFPs) are widely implemented to address child poverty, food insecurity and malnutrition, yet evidence on their influence on children’s health outcomes is limited. With ongoing debate around universal versus targeted provision, this scoping review aims to map global literature on SFPs, identify which health and well-being outcomes are reported, and explore how these outcomes vary by programme type (targeted vs universal).

Scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework.

Four electronic databases—Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar—were searched in December 2023 and July 2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened.

Included studies examined the impact of SFPs on physical, emotional, psychological and social health outcomes in children aged 5–16. Only English-language studies published between 2009 and 2025 were included.

Data were extracted using a structured template and reviewed by multiple authors. Due to the heterogeneity in study designs and reported outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was used to group findings thematically, following established guidance for narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.

A total of 44 papers were included in the final review, spanning 13 countries and published between 2009 and 2025. SFPs were associated with healthier weight status, improved dietary intake, better social engagement and reductions in stigma. Targeted programmes addressed food insecurity but were more often linked to stigma and poorer mental health outcomes.

Universal SFP were effective at improving children’s health outcomes such as healthy weight, improved behaviour and social support. Overall, both targeted and universal SFP positively impact children’s health outcomes and address health disparities.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately one in five people over 60 in the UK. In severe cases, revascularisation, such as surgical bypass or endovascular methods, is often required to restore limb perfusion. Between 2000 and 2019, 527 131 revascularisation procedures were carried out in the UK. Postprocedural surveillance is essential to detect restenosis and maintain vessel patency. However, standard surveillance using duplex ultrasound (DUS) is resource intensive. Ankle Doppler waveform assessment is quick, inexpensive and accurate for PAD diagnosis, yet its role in postrevascularisation surveillance remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ankle handheld Doppler waveform assessment (ankle HHD) for detecting restenosis after lower limb revascularisation, as compared with formal DUS.

This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06619223). We aim to recruit 121 people with PAD undergoing planned lower limb revascularisation at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Follow-up assessments will take place at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post revascularisation. At each visit, a vascular scientist will perform the index test (Ankle HHD) followed by DUS as the reference standard. A subset of participants will undergo repeat testing to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Restenosis will be defined as one or more arterial lesions of ≥50% stenosis or tandem lesions with a combined value of ≥50%. The primary outcome is the sensitivity of ankle Doppler waveform assessment for detecting restenosis, compared with DUS.

The study has received approval from Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (REC reference 24/LO/0462). Results will be disseminated through research presentations and papers.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06619223.

Thanks to the introduction of recent national guidelines for treating herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis, health outcomes have improved. This paper evaluates the health system costs and the health-related quality of life implications of these guidelines.

A sub-analysis of data from a prospective, multi-centre, observational cohort ENCEPH-UK study conducted across 29 hospitals in the UK from 2012 to 2015.

Data for patients aged ≥16 years with a confirmed HSV encephalitis diagnosis admitted for treatment with aciclovir were collected at discharge, 3 and 12 months.

Patient health outcomes were measured by the Glasgow outcome score (GOS), modified ranking score (mRS) and the EuroQoL; healthcare costs were estimated per patient at discharge from hospital and at 12 months follow-up. In addition, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated from the EQ-5D utility scores. Cost–utility analysis was performed using the NHS and Social Care perspective.

A total of 49 patients were included; 35 were treated within 48 hours, ‘early’ (median (IQR) 8.25 [3.7–20.5]) and 14 were treated after 48 hours ‘delayed’ (median (IQR) 93.9 [66.7–100.1]). At discharge, 30 (86%) in the early treatment group had a good mRS outcome score (0–3) compared with 4 (29%) in the delayed group. According to GOS, 10 (29%) had a good recovery in the early treatment group, but only 1 (7%) in the delayed group. EQ-5D-3L utility value at discharge was significantly higher for early treatment (0.609 vs 0.221, p

This study suggests that early treatment may be associated with better health outcomes and reduced patient healthcare costs, with a potential for savings to the NHS with faster treatment.

This study aims to review whether both clinical and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty have improved over time using the National Joint Registry (NJR).

This study is a population-based cohort study using the NJR and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.

Publicly funded hospitals and procedures in England from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2021.

All patients that received a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in the specified time period. Patients were excluded if they had less than 1 year of follow-up.

Primary outcome was revision at one year. Secondary outcomes were non-revision re-operation and mortality at one year, length of stay (LOS) and mean change in Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) from pre-operatively to 6 months post-operatively.

There were 24 411 RSA cases available for analysis. There was no significant improvement in revision rates over time; however, there was a significant reduction in non-revision re-operations (OR 0.93 (0.86–0.99) p=0.03) and mortality (0.96 (0.92–1.00) p=0.04). LOS over time improved with an average reduction of 0.24 days per year, ranging from a mean of 3.94 days in 2013 to 2.44 days in 2021 (p

Over the 9-year period recorded in the NJR, revision rates were low and remained similar. There has, however, been an improvement in other clinical outcomes such as non-revision reoperation and mortality as well as functional outcomes and reduced LOS, which demonstrates progress in the quality of care provided to shoulder replacement patients and is suggestive of advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management and rehabilitation strategies.

Chronic tic disorders (CTDs)—such as Tourette Syndrome (TS)—are neurodevelopmental disorders affecting at least 1% of the population, causing repetitive involuntary movements and vocalisations known as tics. This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of accessing healthcare for people with CTD or TS and their families in the United Kingdom (UK), as part of a larger programme of work to inform change to healthcare services for this population.

Informed and designed with extensive patient and public involvement, the design utilised qualitative research using focus groups. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Participants were recruited via online support groups, social media and research registers.

Seven focus groups were held separately with young people with tics (n=2), adults with tics (n=10) and parents/guardians of children with tics (n=11), led by a lived experience expert (coauthor PS) and facilitated by researchers. Discussion focused on three areas: the impact of living with tics, experience accessing healthcare for tics and management of tics.

Five themes were developed highlighting challenges across the healthcare pathway, including gaining a diagnosis, and receiving treatment, resulting in the use of self-support methods to reduce tic expression or the impact of tics. Themes also illustrated perceptions that healthcare provider's knowledge impacted initial interactions with the healthcare system, and how healthcare systems were not felt to be prioritising CTDs.

The findings highlight a lack of prioritisation for tic disorders compounded by a healthcare structure which does not support a complex condition that requires a multidisciplinary approach. This research calls for improvements to UK healthcare services for CTD.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living with disability have unequal access to health and disability support services. The impacts of colonialism and the deficit-based, Western medical model of disability have been identified as barriers to services in remote Aboriginal communities. This study explored different perceptions of disability and identified strategies to help bridge the gap between Aboriginal community members in the Fitzroy Valley and Western health and disability support services.

Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach with in-depth interviews. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Preliminary results were presented to community representatives for contextualisation, validation and to co-design recommendations.

Fitzroy Valley in the Kimberley region, Western Australia.

Aboriginal community members with lived experience of disability (n=7) and health and disability support service providers (n=12).

Eight themes were identified: (1) Aboriginal kinship systems are a community strength and support for people living with disability; (2) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive disability as a social construct; (3) Western medical model of disability differs from Aboriginal perceptions of disability; (4) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive different types of disabilities in various ways; (5) good awareness of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in the Fitzroy Valley, but more education is wanted; (6) focus on functional needs and supports for disability; (7) barriers to disability services and (8) decolonise disability services. Community co-designed recommendations focus on centring the Aboriginal worldviews of disability in the Fitzroy Valley.

Decolonising disability services is needed to improve access for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. This should involve adapting the current Western medical model of services to enable strengths-based diagnostic and support services that align with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander kinship systems, cultures and ways of being. Community leadership must play a central role in this shift.

Video games have been linked to a range of positive and negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and young adults. However, to better understand how games affect the mental health of young people, their use and experiences must be situated in the sociocultural and personal life contexts of individuals. Drawing from a cultural-ecosocial approach, this study combines cross-sectional and digital phenotyping measures to examine the effects of video games on the mental health of youth.

Participants will be young people aged 16–25 years from the community and living in the province of Quebec, Canada. An initial sample of 1000 youth will complete a cross-sectional survey online, including measures of socio-demographic context, gaming practices and experiences, streaming practices and experiences, as well as personality and well-being. Qualitative questions will explore personal views on games and mental health. A subsample of 100 participants will be selected for digital phenotyping, including daily surveys of well-being, gaming, streaming and social experiences, combined with passive mobile sensing (eg, geolocation). Analyses will include regression and mixed models for quantitative data, reflexive thematic analysis for qualitative data, and an integration of quantitative and qualitative results using participatory methods.

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of McGill University (24-02-015). The dissemination of results will be conducted in partnership with a multi-stakeholder advisory committee, including youth who play video games, and will involve peer-reviewed publications, presentations to policymakers in Quebec, and workshops for clinicians and researchers.