To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.

Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.

A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.

Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group’s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid’s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).

Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.

Poststroke motor dysfunction places a heavy burden on individuals and society. Virtual reality (VR) offers enhanced motor skill transfer and active rehabilitation by overcoming the scenario-specific constraints of conventional therapies. Validating the efficacy of VR rehabilitation could lead to scalable and cost-effective solutions, potentially enabling home-based rehabilitation. However, the widespread clinical application remains constrained by the lack of rehabilitation-specific VR and multidimensional quantitative assessments. The aim of this study was to investigate the multidimensional effects and neural mechanisms of VR rehabilitation in poststroke motor recovery.

This study is a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial protocol designed to evaluate the effects of multisensory VR training on motor dysfunction in patients who had a stroke using multidimensional assessments. The trial consists of a baseline assessment, a 4-week intervention period and an endpoint assessment. A total of 40 patients who had a stroke will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either a VR combined with treadmill group or a treadmill-only group. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity score, while secondary outcomes include three-dimensional gait analysis, the Berg Balance Scale score, the activities of daily living score and functional near-infrared spectroscopy results. Safety will be evaluated by monitoring the incidence of adverse events. This study aims to determine whether VR rehabilitation offers superior efficacy in improving motor function in patients who had a stroke by using a multidimensional assessment approach, including neural coupling function, muscle movement mechanics and clinical performance. The findings will provide robust, high-quality evidence to support the broader application of VR in clinical practice.

The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (2022–155). This study protocol was registered with the clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06275516). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented at a conference.

NCT06275516.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a commonly employed surgical technique for the management of operable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This procedure, however, is dependent on the patient’s ability to tolerate surgery. In light of this, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a viable alternative treatment strategy for patients who are inoperable or who refuse surgery. Considering the lack of randomised controlled trials and the increased risk of bias in observational cohort studies, this study protocol proposes an emulated target trial design to investigate the causal effect of SABR, in comparison to VATS, on overall survival in operable early stage NSCLC patients.

Data on NSCLC patients will be collected from routinely collected university hospital records linked with German cancer registry data. This study protocol was developed using the target trial methodology outlined by Hernan et al. The protocol establishes specific parameters for key trial components in order to mitigate bias in the analysis of observational data and to facilitate the calculation of causal estimands. The target trial design that would be emulated is a multicentre open-label two-parallel arm superiority randomised trial. Mediators and confounding variables were determined through the use of a directed acyclic graph. The statistical analysis aims to measure the per-protocol and intention to treat effect of SABR versus VATS within 3 months of diagnosis, on survival, through the difference in restricted mean survival times, using weighted non-parametric Kaplan-Meier curves.

The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg with an approved addendum with Dnr 2023–112 has approved this study. The study uses anonymised routinely collected hospital and cancer registry data in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries.

Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed.

Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

CRD42022315407.

Well-being of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is vital for care quality, staff retention and overall healthcare system effectiveness. This study aims to identify the organisational and workplace variables associated with sick leave and measures of engagement of HCPs on department level within a single Dutch academic hospital.

Cross-sectional study using routinely collected organisational data.

A tertiary-care academic hospital in the Netherlands.

25 clinical departments were included. Department level variables were derived from routinely collected hospital databases. Availability of data varied across variables. Analysis included information on patient population, human resources, care processes, quality of care and employee and patient experiences to assess differences, correlations and predictors for sick leave and engagement.

Primary outcome measures were (1) sick leave (%) and (2) engagement, assessed through two staff-survey items (vitality and connectedness; 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale). Both outcomes were analysed at department level.

Employee population data showed the most consistent patterns across analyses. Departments with higher staffing capacity had higher sick leave and lower engagement in group comparisons (p=0.009, p=0.030, respectively). In multivariable models, higher staffing capacity remained associated with increased sick leave (B=1.38, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.23, p=0.003). Engagement was positively associated with higher inflow (B=0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.77, p=0.037) and negatively associated with outflow (B = –1.36, 95% CI –2.08 to –0.63, p=0.001). No consistent associations were found with patient population and patient experience measures.

Workforce-related factors, particularly staffing capacity and inflow and outflow, are strongly linked to sick leave and engagement. Routinely collected hospital data can be used to identify at-risk departments and inform targeted strategies for improving workforce sustainability. Future studies should explore more granular, team-level data to better support staff well-being and care quality.

Settings with insufficient human resources struggle to provide timely eye care services and information to the population. mHealth (mobile healthcare) is a promising solution; however, evidence on the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR) and real-time phone-based education remains scarce, despite their potential to be scalable and cost-effective. This study aims to implement the Virtual Baithak, an interactive mHealth platform, to improve eye-health literacy among older adults residing in rural India. The objectives are to (1) Develop and validate the Virtual Baithak for improving vision health and (2) Determine its effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability among the older adults.

This 3-armed, parallel, randomised controlled trial of 14 months duration will enrol 381 older adults (aged 60 years and above). Participants will be blinded and randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either of the three groups based on the intervention for eye-health education they receive: both IVR and group calls moderated by a healthcare professional, only IVR and usual care. The two intervention arms will receive the information weekly over a 3-month period through the Virtual Baithak platform, which will be designed for this study using a participatory research approach to develop the content. The primary study outcomes are digital health literacy and vision health knowledge scores, measured at baseline and 14 months. The secondary outcomes include m-health technology acceptance and usage practices. A mixed-method process evaluation will be conducted to assess the intervention feasibility and implementation, including in-depth interviews with participants. The qualitative data will be thematically analysed to explore factors that promote or restrain the implementation. The inferential statistical quantitative analysis will be performed using linear mixed models.

The study has been approved by the ‘Institute Ethics Committee,’ PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (PGI/IEC/2022/EIC000282 dated 18 February 2022). The results will be disseminated via presentations and/or publications at the national and international levels.

CTRI/2023/02/049383, dated 1 February 2023.

Colchicine has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and may improve outcomes in arteriovenous fistulas used for haemodialysis due to antiproliferative effects. However, it is often avoided in patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, a large trial assessing the potential benefits of colchicine in dialysis patients cannot begin without further data on feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of carrying out future trials of colchicine in dialysis patients.

This is an open-label, single centre, single arm study with 100 participants. The primary outcome is feasibility and the decision to progress to a full-scale trial. This will be based on the consent rate and the colchicine discontinuation rate. Secondary objectives are testing the feasibility of data collection procedures relating to quality-of-life measures, vascular access interventions and safety. Other secondary objectives are to assess the utility of the electronic health record for collecting trial data and to explore patients’ and healthcare providers’ experiences and attitudes towards colchicine and a feasibility study.

The study has Research Ethics Committee approval (Wales REC 6; 24/WA/0277). It is intended that the results of the study will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

ISRCTN91308625.

Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are effective interventions to support patient involvement in health decisions and have the potential to impact favourably on health inequities by reducing gender bias in clinical practice. The aim was to explore sex and gender reporting and differences in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PtDAs for adults making treatment or screening decisions.

Secondary analysis of the Cochrane review of PtDAs of RCTs that reported sex and/or gender. The original review searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and EBSCO from journal inception to March 2022. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. For this secondary analysis, we only included primary outcomes from the original review. We assessed appropriate use of terminology for sex (biological attribute) and gender (social construct). When terms were used interchangeably, it was considered inaccurate. Findings were synthesised descriptively, and we used meta-analysis when two or more RCTs were conducted with females/women or males/men using similar outcome measures.

Informed values-choice congruence and the quality of the decision-making process (eg, knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision making, undecided) and adverse events (eg, decision regret, emotional distress) by sex and gender.

Of 209 RCTs in the original review, 206 reported sex and/or gender, with 35 (17%) using accurate terminology. Of 206 RCTs, 70 were with females/women only, 27 males/men only, 12 analysed by sex/gender and 97 RCTs did not disaggregate findings by sex or gender. Meta-analysis comparing RCTs for females/women to usual care and RCTs for males/men only compared with usual care showed similar mean differences in knowledge scores (10.84 vs 9.38 out of 100; p=0.44). Males/men had significantly higher self-reported participation in decision making compared with females/women (RR 3.16 vs 0.95; p

In PtDA RCTs, sex and gender terms are used interchangeably and 6% analysed outcomes by sex or gender. Meta-analysis of males/men only given PtDAs showed higher self-reported decision making participation in clinical practice compared to usual care versus females/women only compared with usual care. Researchers must improve reporting sex and gender in PtDA RCTs to assess how it influences health inequities.

Conflict behaviours, such as aggression, along with containment practices like seclusion, adversely affect both patients’ well-being and staff safety.1–3 To create safer therapeutic environments, the Safewards model was developed, incorporating ten core interventions to enhance staff-patient interactions.1 3 These encompass strategies such as establishing clear mutual expectations, employing soft words and implementing...

Infertility impacts approximately one in six people globally,1 with distinct patterns in Africa where both primary and secondary infertility are prevalent.2 Women, who account for 54.01% of African infertility cases, face disproportionate social stigma, regardless of the cause.2 3 In these cultures, where childbearing carries significant social value, the psychological impact is severe,2 3 with high depression rates among infertile individuals.3

Roomaney et...

Elderly patients, defined as adults aged 65 years and above, represent a growing segment of the surgical population.1 Despite numerous advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care, elderly patients face unique physical and psychological challenges that can exacerbate their risk of poor clinical outcomes.2 The recent study by Kata et al explores...

Qualitative research methods allow investigators to gain a detailed understanding of phenomena, based on the collection and analysis of rich data. An important element of some qualitative studies is key informants (KIs)—those are a specific set of participants who are able to provide particularly valuable viewpoints and insights on the issues or questions being examined.1 2

The concept of using KIs dates back to early anthropological studies, where researchers relied on local experts to help better understand cultural practices and social structures. Over time, this approach has evolved, with increasing recognition of the value that KIs bring to a wide array of fields, including public health, education, social sciences, medicine and nursing.3 This ‘Research Made Simple’ article explores what KIs are, how they can benefit nursing and healthcare research and what practical steps can be taken by researchers to optimise the...

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism disorder and intellectual disability (ID) are increasingly identified, and the co-occurrence of these and other social-emotional conditions has raised awareness that treatment of people with multiple diagnoses becomes more complex. Hollingdale and colleagues1 have examined this and begun to identify factors that modify and moderate the cumulative impact on functioning. As...

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has become one of the most prevalent occupational health problems1 and represents a major burden for individuals, employers1 2 and healthcare systems.1 The need to consider psychosocial factors such as stress and coping strategies is increasingly recognised...

Self-harm is defined as self-injury or self-poisoning, irrespective of the presence or absence of suicidal intent.1 Self-harm could be divided into the following categories: (1) self-harm with suicidal intent (suicide attempts); (2) self-harm without suicidal intent (non-suicidal self-injury and non-suicidal self-poisoning) and (3) self-harm with undetermined or mixed intent. Self-harm resulting in a presentation to an emergency room is the strongest known predictor of death by suicide.1

The prevalence of self-harm is just under...

Clinical psychology interventions for reducing obesity have developed alongside pharmacological and surgical treatments, but usually as interventions for individual patients. Any healthcare intervention rests on a logic model: assumptions that through specific physical and social mechanisms, it will produce certain intended outcomes, provided that conducive background conditions (‘contexts’) exist. Using evidence from the feasibility trial preceding a full randomised controlled trial (RCT), this paper assesses the empirical validity of the initial logic model of a new group-based weight management intervention: PROGROUP, designed for patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m² with comorbidities. We aimed to test whether:

Multimethod proof-of-concept study by means of realist evaluation of the initial PROGROUP logic model. We:

Specialised ambulatory mental health services in the English NHS.

Adults with severe obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m² or ≥35 kg/m² with comorbidities).

Group-building techniques to enhance group members’ adoption of evidence-based methods of behaviour change affecting their dietary behaviour and physical activity.

Qualitative outcomes. What kinds of:

Quantitative measures not used.

The initial logic model assumed that the following sequence of mechanisms would produce weight loss: referral from GP to specialist weight management services; further referral to PROGROUP; preparatory individual consultation; facilitated group sessions produce a group identity; group identity reinforces weight management capability and motivation; further individual consultations adjust for individual circumstances; behaviour change outside the treatment setting, producing weight loss. Contexts necessary for these mechanisms to work included: sufficient catchment population; group size, continuity and membership retention; suitable location; facilitator training; and practical support outside the treatment setting.

The findings suggested revisions to the logic model, but more in the delivery components and contextual assumptions than the core therapeutic mechanisms. There was scope to simplify the referral mechanisms. Different professions could implement the model. A realist evaluation of a pre-RCT feasibility study can be used to make the intervention’s logic model more securely evidence-based, serving as a proof-of-concept test for the intervention. It indicated the conditions under which such group psychological interventions might be more widely used.

ISRCTN22088800.