To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.

Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.

A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.

Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group’s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid’s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).

Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.

Language-concordant care, or healthcare in one’s preferred language, is important both for health equity and for improving health outcomes. Linguistic minorities, like Francophones in Ontario, Canada, are at risk of poorer clinical outcomes if they receive non-language-concordant primary care. However, common ratio-based access measures can provide misleading views of minorities’ actual access levels. This cross-sectional geospatial study demonstrates a new way to measure primary care access using average travel time to the nearest five English- and French-speaking family physicians. We also introduce the concept of primary care access fragility, where a region’s primary care access may depend on one or a few local family physicians. Our research question is: are there differences in travel burden and access fragility for census subdivisions (CSDs) across language (English/French), rurality (urban/rural) and region (north/south) in the province of Ontario, Canada?

We conducted a cross-sectional geospatial analysis to estimate English-language and French-language primary care travel burdens and access fragility in Ontario, Canada. We used population and boundary data from Statistics Canada’s 2021 census, road-network data from OpenStreetMaps, and family physician practice locations and language abilities from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. We measured travel burden using Valhalla, an open-source road-network analysis platform.

We conducted our analysis for Ontario, Canada’s 577 CSDs, which correspond roughly to municipalities and with populations ranging from 5 inhabitants in Rainy Lake 17B to a high of 2 794 356 in Toronto.

Using public data from January 2026, we identified 15 762 family physicians practising in Ontario, of whom 11.0% reported speaking French. Patient data were obtained from the most recent 2021 census.

Our first primary outcome measures were CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five English-speaking family physicians, and CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest five French-speaking family physicians, which we compared to explore regional inequities in travel burden. Our secondary outcome measures were based on a novel notion of the travel burden component of ‘primary care access fragility’. This metric indicates how dependent a region’s access is on a small number of local physicians and is defined as the difference between the CSD-level mean travel time to the nearest one physician and to the nearest five physicians. As the difference in travel times grows, so too does access fragility.

Median differences in French-language and English-language travel burdens were strongly significant across rurality, regions and overall (median difference 13.4 min, p

Compared with the general public, Ontario’s French-speakers face higher travel burdens to language-concordant family physicians and higher access fragility, especially in rural and northern regions. Our results are of interest to policymakers and health-system planners, and our methods are applicable to other populations and regions.

Overweight and obesity are a growing global public health problem. Eating behaviours of adults and children are largely influenced by the home food environment (HFE). The lack of access to nutritious food in homes contributes to unhealthy dietary habits and, consequently, overweight and obesity among adults and children, as well as chronic diseases associated with poor diets. The present systematic review aims to identify existing HFE and household food security interventions and to determine the effects of these interventions in improving the availability of healthy food in the home, household access to food, diet quality and nutritional status of adults.

This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be searched for relevant articles using keywords and MeSH terms. Risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group and Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The overall strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified records and assess the eligible full texts for inclusion. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. A thematic synthesis will be performed for qualitative studies.

This study has a systematic review and meta-analysis design, which will assess published data and does not require ethical approval. Findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD420251030896.

This study aims to explore the history of prior abortions and the factors influencing them among young women seeking abortion services in Foshan, Guangdong, China.

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of young women seeking abortion care.

Gynaecological outpatient clinics at the Department of Gynaecology, Foshan Women and Children Hospital Affiliated to Guangdong Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China, between 2013 and 2023.

A total of 7361 young women aged 12–25 years seeking abortion services.

Data on abortion history, sociodemographic factors, contraceptive use and postabortion contraceptive choices were collected and analysed, with special emphasis on the incidence of repeat abortions and the factors associated with them.

Of the 7361 participants, 34.2% reported at least one previous abortion, underscoring a notable public health concern. The mean age of the participants was 22.30 years (SD=2.13). Women with a history of abortion were significantly older than those without (22.57 vs 22.08 years, p

This study underscores the need for targeted interventions to address the multifaceted factors leading to repeat abortions among young women in China. The results offer valuable insights for improving reproductive health outcomes in this vulnerable population and highlight the importance of expanding access to contraceptive education and services in China.

To investigate the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and coronary artery disease (CAD) and to evaluate the efficacy of a retinal phenotype-based diagnostic model as a non-invasive tool for early CAD screening.

A retrospective cross-sectional study.

A single-centre study conducted at the Cardiovascular Center of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, China, between January and October 2024.

417 patients with suspected angina undergoing their first coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and high-quality fundus photography within 24 hours pre-CAG. Major exclusions were prior coronary interventions, severe systemic/valvular heart diseases and ocular conditions impairing retinal vascular visualisation.

The primary outcome was the association between quantitative retinal vascular parameters and the presence of CAD (defined as ≥50% stenosis). Secondary outcomes included the diagnostic performance area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of three predictive models: one based on quantitative retinal vascular parameters alone, one based on traditional risk factors and a combined model integrating both retinal and clinical variables.

This study enrolled 417 patients undergoing initial CAG. Compared with non-CAD controls (n=190), patients with CAD (n=227) had higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes, along with elevated levels of fasting blood glucose, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), triglyceride (TG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (all p

Our findings, derived from an artificial intelligence-based fully automated quantitative retinal vascular parameters measurement method, revealed that multiple quantitative fundus parameters—including FD, VD and other morphological parameters were significantly associated with CAD risk. The CAD diagnostic model we developed demonstrates strong performance and high interpretability, making it suitable for early CAD screening and diagnosis.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a commonly employed surgical technique for the management of operable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This procedure, however, is dependent on the patient’s ability to tolerate surgery. In light of this, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has emerged as a viable alternative treatment strategy for patients who are inoperable or who refuse surgery. Considering the lack of randomised controlled trials and the increased risk of bias in observational cohort studies, this study protocol proposes an emulated target trial design to investigate the causal effect of SABR, in comparison to VATS, on overall survival in operable early stage NSCLC patients.

Data on NSCLC patients will be collected from routinely collected university hospital records linked with German cancer registry data. This study protocol was developed using the target trial methodology outlined by Hernan et al. The protocol establishes specific parameters for key trial components in order to mitigate bias in the analysis of observational data and to facilitate the calculation of causal estimands. The target trial design that would be emulated is a multicentre open-label two-parallel arm superiority randomised trial. Mediators and confounding variables were determined through the use of a directed acyclic graph. The statistical analysis aims to measure the per-protocol and intention to treat effect of SABR versus VATS within 3 months of diagnosis, on survival, through the difference in restricted mean survival times, using weighted non-parametric Kaplan-Meier curves.

The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg with an approved addendum with Dnr 2023–112 has approved this study. The study uses anonymised routinely collected hospital and cancer registry data in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

Suicide is a major public health concern among youth in Canada and worldwide. The most rapid increases in suicidal ideation, self-harm, and suicide attempts have been observed among adolescent girls, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent studies report disproportionately high rates of emergency department visits and hospitalisations for suicide-related concerns among adolescent girls. Despite these concerning trends, limited evidence exists on the life trajectories, needs, and service pathways of adolescent girls who attempt suicide. This protocol describes a qualitative suicide audit focused on adolescent girls aged 12–17 who were hospitalised following a suicide attempt in two regions of the province of Québec, Canada. The aim is to understand developmental trajectories, document services received and identify individual, relational and systemic factors influencing these trajectories to generate recommendations that inform suicide prevention.

Using a narrative qualitative design and a community-based research approach, data will be collected from semi-structured interviews with adolescents and parents, parent questionnaires and hospital health records. These data will be integrated to develop anonymised case vignettes. A multidisciplinary panel, including clinicians, health system stakeholders, community partners and individuals with lived experience, will review each case to identify gaps and strengths in care and generate case-level and cross-case recommendations for clinical practice, health policy and professional training.

Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee (REC) of the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches, which serves as the reviewing REC, with administrative reviews underway at two other health authorities. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and collaborative knowledge-mobilisation activities with clinical and community partners, including practice-oriented tools and accessible materials for adolescents and parents.

Early screening of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is critical for early diagnosis and management. The disease was renamed and its diagnostic criteria revised as metabolic-associated FLD (MAFLD) in 2020 and further updated to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023. This study evaluated the predictive performance and clinical feasibility of non-invasive diagnostic indicators across the NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD diagnostic criteria.

Cross-sectional study.

Health Management Centre in China.

A total of 5810 participants aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Individuals with missing laboratory data, imaging results or self-reported information were excluded.

Disease-specific indicators included Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index and Zhejiang University index (ZJU). Non-disease-specific indicators included lipid accumulation product (LAP), Visceral Adiposity Index and the Triglyceride and Glucose Index. Subgroup analysis was performed by gender and Body Mass Index (BMI).

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all six non-invasive indicators exceeded 0.7. FLI showed the optimal predictive performance across the three criteria (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.802, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.847 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.811), with comparable performance observed for ZJU (0.797, 0.838 and 0.809, respectively). Pairwise z-tests demonstrated a significant difference between FLI and ZJU for MAFLD (p0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that ZJU performed better in males (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.790, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.839 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.803), while FLI was superior in females (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.832, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.838 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.838) and in participants who were overweight (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.709, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.765 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.709). LAP exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in the normal BMI subgroup (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.758, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.804 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.796).

FLI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy across all diagnostic criteria, and ZJU showed comparable performance. Considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicality, ZJU is recommended as a favourable, non-invasive tool for population-based screening in the Chinese population.

Clinical documentation is a significant driver of burnout among physicians. Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes, which leverage generative large language models to automate the creation of clinical notes from patient–physician conversations, are rapidly emerging as a potential solution. While these tools promise to enhance efficiency and reduce administrative tasks, concerns about the quality, accuracy and potential biases persist. There is now a need for a systematic synthesis of evidence to evaluate the impact of these technologies in clinical practice. To assess the effects of ambient AI scribes on physicians’ clinical documentation, the specific objectives are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of these tools on documentation, including accuracy and completeness; (2) synthesise evidence on the impact on physician efficiency after adoption, including time spent on documentation and (3) examine physicians’ satisfaction with these tools, including physicians’ perceived burden.

A systematic review of quantitative or mixed-method studies as well as preprints will be conducted. We will perform a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science, along with medRix and ClinicalTrials.gov for preprints) for empirical studies published between January 2023 and March 2026. The review will synthesise studies comparing physicians’ use of ambient AI scribes with traditional documentation approaches. Given the anticipated heterogeneity of the studies, a narrative synthesis will be employed to summarise the findings. Where common quantitative outcomes exist, effect sizes will be calculated using Hedges’ g, mean differences or risk ratios/odds ratios as appropriate. The overall quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

As no patient data are involved in the data collection, no ethical approval is acquired. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed, open-access journal, and presented at relevant academic conferences.

CRD420251149086.

Multimorbidity among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection has emerged as a priority for healthcare and public health systems worldwide.

This study aimed to characterise time-trends in multimorbidities among patients with CHB infection. We identified multimorbidity clusters and combinations and quantified their associations with healthcare services utilisation.

A retrospective observational study, using electronic medical record data.

A large tertiary general hospital in China.

The study included 23 137 patients with CHB infection admitted between 2011 and 2023.

Latent class analysis and association rule mining (ARM) were performed to identify multimorbidity clusters and combinations, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between the identified multimorbidity patterns and length of stay (LOS), daily expense and 1-year readmission for liver-related conditions (OYRL).

The mean number of multimorbidities among hospitalised patients with CHB infection was 2.82±1.89. From 2011 to 2023, mean age increased from 44.2±13.7 to 48.4±13.1 (p

Multimorbidity imposes a substantial burden on CHB-infected patients. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of CHB infection, as well as tailored integral strategies for multimorbidity management in individuals with CHB infection.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a common and severe infection, with a 90-day mortality of 24%–32%. Cloxacillin is regarded as a first-line antibiotic treatment in SAB in Sweden. However, exposure to cloxacillin in real-world hospitalised patients with SAB, most of whom are elderly patients treated outside the intensive care unit, is not well described. There are also limited data on the role of unbound cloxacillin exposure in relation to renal function or drug-induced toxicity.

This multicentre, prospective, observational clinical trial will include 95 adult patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteraemia, treated with cloxacillin. Patients with endocarditis, polymicrobial bacteraemia or those considered unsuitable for cloxacillin treatment are excluded. Trough and peak total and unbound cloxacillin concentrations will be measured at steady state at days 2 and 7. Blood cultures will be obtained at days 2, 3, 4 and 7 to assess time to negative culture. Renal function will be assessed daily for plasma creatinine and at days 1 and 6 for cystatin C and for 12-hour urine creatinine clearance. In a novel approach to detecting nephrotoxicity, renal tubular damage biomarkers will be measured at days 1 and 6 (KIM-1, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urine cystatin C, alpha-1-microglobulin). Detection of neurologic symptoms such as confusion, tremor, hallucinations and convulsions, as well as consciousness, will be monitored daily using a structured evaluation form.

We aim to investigate to which extent target attainment (100% of the dosing interval during which the free (unbound) drug concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration) is achieved with standard dosing of cloxacillin in a real-world cohort of hospitalised patients with SAB, and whether initial renal function can predict who is at risk for underdosing or overdosing. We will also explore whether neurological or renal damage is prevalent and associated with cloxacillin levels.

Ethics approval has been granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EUCT 2023-505148-20-00) as part of a low-intervention clinical trial approval according to EU regulation 536/2014. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences.

EUCT 2023-505148-20-00.

Well-being of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is vital for care quality, staff retention and overall healthcare system effectiveness. This study aims to identify the organisational and workplace variables associated with sick leave and measures of engagement of HCPs on department level within a single Dutch academic hospital.

Cross-sectional study using routinely collected organisational data.

A tertiary-care academic hospital in the Netherlands.

25 clinical departments were included. Department level variables were derived from routinely collected hospital databases. Availability of data varied across variables. Analysis included information on patient population, human resources, care processes, quality of care and employee and patient experiences to assess differences, correlations and predictors for sick leave and engagement.

Primary outcome measures were (1) sick leave (%) and (2) engagement, assessed through two staff-survey items (vitality and connectedness; 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale). Both outcomes were analysed at department level.

Employee population data showed the most consistent patterns across analyses. Departments with higher staffing capacity had higher sick leave and lower engagement in group comparisons (p=0.009, p=0.030, respectively). In multivariable models, higher staffing capacity remained associated with increased sick leave (B=1.38, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.23, p=0.003). Engagement was positively associated with higher inflow (B=0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.77, p=0.037) and negatively associated with outflow (B = –1.36, 95% CI –2.08 to –0.63, p=0.001). No consistent associations were found with patient population and patient experience measures.

Workforce-related factors, particularly staffing capacity and inflow and outflow, are strongly linked to sick leave and engagement. Routinely collected hospital data can be used to identify at-risk departments and inform targeted strategies for improving workforce sustainability. Future studies should explore more granular, team-level data to better support staff well-being and care quality.

To determine whether a novel urine collection device (the ‘Pee-in-Pot (PiP)’) produces the same rates of reportable urine culture results as standard of care (SOC) urine collection. To determine whether the PiP produces comparable microscopy results to SOC urine collection. To estimate the carbon footprint of the PiP compared to SOC urine collection.

A prospectively designed, single-centre, paired comparison study.

A district general hospital in Southwest England, including antenatal clinical, accident and emergency, medical and surgical ward environments.

Adults aged 18 or over.

Urine passed through the PiP device before being decanted into a 10 mL boric acid tube for microscopy and culture, compared with the same urine contained only in a sterile plastic vessel before being decanted into a boric acid tube for microscopy and culture.

The proportion of positive urine culture results.

The proportion of heavy mixed growth culture results. Comparison of particle counts: all small particles, bacteria, red blood cells and white blood cells.

Microscopy was performed for 1353 paired samples, of which 808 paired samples both underwent culture. Overall, urine cultures were positive in 9.3% (75/808) and 10.0% (81/808) of PiP and control cases, respectively. Overall matching between PiP and control arms for reportable positive culture results was 98.5% (796/808), with a Cohen’s Kappa test coefficient () of 0.9149 (almost perfect agreement). There was no significant difference in the rate of positive urine culture results between testing arms for any organisms (margin of non-inferiority prospectively defined as ±2.5% for Escherichia coli positive cultures). For microscopy, there was agreement in meeting culture thresholds for 1308 of 1353 paired samples with a difference in culturing rates of 0.00517 (95% CI –0.0045 to 0.015, ie, high level of agreement). The estimated base case carbon footprint of PiP testing was 95g CO2e compared to 270g CO2e for SOC testing.

This study found the PiP to be non-inferior for routine urine microscopy and culture testing and to have a lower carbon footprint compared with SOC urine testing.

Up to 30% of individuals with depression develop persistent depressive disorder (PDD), an often disabling and difficult to treat condition. The Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is the only psychotherapy developed specifically for treating individuals with PDD. While several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated its efficacy in outpatient settings, evidence for its use in inpatient settings remains limited. Pilot studies of CBASP inpatient programmes in Germany have shown promising feasibility and effectiveness; however, no RCTs to date have systematically evaluated their outcomes. This study represents the first RCT to compare the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of CBASP with Behavioural Activation (BA), a first-line psychotherapy for depression, within an intensive multimodal inpatient setting.

In this prospective, multicentre, rater-blinded RCT with an active control group, we aim to recruit 396 adults (aged 18–70 years) with treatment-resistant PDD at eight German university hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) CBASP or (2) BA within an intensive treatment programme consisting of 10 weeks acute treatment in an inpatient and/or day clinic setting, followed by 6 weeks of outpatient continuation treatment. Primary and secondary outcome assessments will be conducted at multiple time points: baseline (T0), treatment onset (T1), after 5 and 10 weeks of acute treatment (T2, T3), at the end of continuation treatment (T4, week 16) and every 2 months up to week 64 (T5, naturalistic follow-up).

The primary outcome measure will be the change in depression severity, as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-item version), after 16 weeks of treatment (from T0 to T4). Secondary outcomes will include response, remission, deterioration and relapse rates, self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms and additional psychological variables. A cost-benefit analysis will evaluate the health-economic benefits of both interventions. Additionally, this RCT will explore personalised treatment selection and mechanisms of change, including potential moderators and mediators of treatment effects. The findings from this trial are expected to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on choosing CBASP versus BA for inpatients with treatment-resistant PDD.

This study has received ethical approval from the ethics committees of all participating university hospitals. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. We have involved people with lived experience from the earliest pilots onward, using their feedback to refine our study design. Ongoing consultation at conferences and public events has further ensured that our research remains grounded in patient perspectives.

NCT04996433.

Survival outcomes for early-stage breast cancer have improved substantially; however, many survivors experience persistent treatment-related toxicities that adversely affect long-term quality of life (QoL) and functional recovery. Prospective survivorship data from China remain limited. The PERSEVERE study aims to characterise longitudinal trajectories of QoL and treatment-related toxicities among Chinese women treated for stage I–III breast cancer and to identify factors associated with suboptimal recovery.

PERSEVERE is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study enrolling approximately 3000 women with newly diagnosed stage I–III invasive breast cancer across cancer centres in China. Data are collected at baseline and serially for up to 5 years, including clinical variables, a validated suite of patient-reported outcome measures collected via a centralised REDCap electronic platform and baseline biospecimens. The primary outcome is the change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL score from baseline to 12 months. Longitudinal and time-to-event analytical approaches appropriate for observational cohort studies will be applied, with exploratory analyses planned to investigate symptom trajectories and biological correlates.

The study protocol (ID: NCC25/629-5575) has been approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access publications and presentations at national and international conferences, with summaries shared with clinicians and patient advocacy groups.

NCT07010939.

Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are effective interventions to support patient involvement in health decisions and have the potential to impact favourably on health inequities by reducing gender bias in clinical practice. The aim was to explore sex and gender reporting and differences in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PtDAs for adults making treatment or screening decisions.

Secondary analysis of the Cochrane review of PtDAs of RCTs that reported sex and/or gender. The original review searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and EBSCO from journal inception to March 2022. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. For this secondary analysis, we only included primary outcomes from the original review. We assessed appropriate use of terminology for sex (biological attribute) and gender (social construct). When terms were used interchangeably, it was considered inaccurate. Findings were synthesised descriptively, and we used meta-analysis when two or more RCTs were conducted with females/women or males/men using similar outcome measures.

Informed values-choice congruence and the quality of the decision-making process (eg, knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision making, undecided) and adverse events (eg, decision regret, emotional distress) by sex and gender.

Of 209 RCTs in the original review, 206 reported sex and/or gender, with 35 (17%) using accurate terminology. Of 206 RCTs, 70 were with females/women only, 27 males/men only, 12 analysed by sex/gender and 97 RCTs did not disaggregate findings by sex or gender. Meta-analysis comparing RCTs for females/women to usual care and RCTs for males/men only compared with usual care showed similar mean differences in knowledge scores (10.84 vs 9.38 out of 100; p=0.44). Males/men had significantly higher self-reported participation in decision making compared with females/women (RR 3.16 vs 0.95; p

In PtDA RCTs, sex and gender terms are used interchangeably and 6% analysed outcomes by sex or gender. Meta-analysis of males/men only given PtDAs showed higher self-reported decision making participation in clinical practice compared to usual care versus females/women only compared with usual care. Researchers must improve reporting sex and gender in PtDA RCTs to assess how it influences health inequities.

Pressure injuries (PIs) pose a substantial global healthcare challenge, with their prevalence ranging from 0% to 72.5% across settings.1 In the UK, over 700 000 individuals are affected annually, with community settings prevalence of 0.40–0.70 per 1000 adults in Northern England.2 Early detection of PIs presents unique challenges in individuals with darker skin tones (DST), accentuating a critical gap in nursing education and...

An online survey was used to measure weight bias of midwives. The survey included demographic questions about age, years since certification, body mass index (BMI), race and ethnicity and state of residence. Participants completed measures of implicit and explicit weight bias including the Implicit Association Test, the Anti-Fat Attitudes questionnaire, the Fat Phobia Scale-Short Form and the Preference for Thin People. Data...

There is a known anecdotal link between the COVID-19 pandemic and poor socioemotional development among children exposed to the dramatic and often frightening restrictions and risks associated with it. Nurses have recognised the difficulties that infants and children have presented within aspects of their development, such as...