Sleep problems are an escalating global health concern, with prevalence estimates ranging from 8.3% to 45%. Physicians are disproportionately affected, with rates around 44% compared with 36% in the general population. In Bangladesh, reported rates range from 32% to 58%, with physicians being particularly vulnerable. Poor sleep among physicians is strongly linked to burnout, medical errors and increased mental health risks. Despite these serious implications, existing evidence from Bangladesh remains fragmented and inconsistent, limiting its utility for health policy and workforce interventions. This review therefore seeks to generate reliable pooled prevalence estimates and identify key determinants of sleep problems among Bangladeshi physicians.

The research team will search the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycInfo, ProQuest Medical, CINAHL, Google Scholar and BanglaJOL electronic and regional databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines for published studies from inception until 1 August 2025, using truncated and phrase-searched keywords, relevant medical subject headings and citation chaining from grey literature. Observational cross-sectional studies published within the predefined timeframe, using validated assessment tools, and published in English or other major international languages will be prioritised for inclusion. Review papers, case reports, case series, intervention studies, commentaries, preprints, meeting abstracts, protocols, unpublished articles and letters will be excluded. Two independent reviewers will screen the retrieved papers using the Rayyan web-based application, with any disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Quantitative estimates of sleep problems, including prevalence, duration, quality and associated risk factors among Bangladeshi physicians will be extracted. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis will be performed to assess the pooled prevalence using a random effects meta-analysis model. Forest and funnel plots will be generated for visualisation. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I² statistic, with sensitivity or subgroup analysis conducted as required. The quality of included studies will be evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools for observational study designs. All statistical analysis will be conducted using Jamovi V2.7.6, R V4.3.2 ‘meta’ packages and GraphPad Prism V9.0.2.

This review will synthesise evidence from existing published literature. While completing the findings, the findings will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences, policy forums and stakeholders’ networks to inform future research and interventions.

CRD420251123294.

To assess how preoperative anaemia affects surgical outcomes in elderly patients within a resource-limited setting.

Prospective cohort study.

Two comprehensive specialised hospitals in Ethiopia.

Participants consisted of 224 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent surgery between 1 December 2024 and 29 March 2025.

Perioperative blood transfusions were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, risk of postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalisation, poor recovery quality and in-hospital mortality.

The anaemic group required transfusions of three or more units more frequently than the non-anaemic group (10.5% vs 2.6%; absolute risk difference 8.0%). Their perioperative transfusion rates were significantly higher (42.3% vs 18.4%; p

Preoperative anaemia significantly increases the risk of transfusion, poor recovery, ICU admission, prolonged hospitalisation and in-hospital mortality in older patients who underwent surgery. In resource-limited settings, improving perioperative outcomes should prioritise the early detection and treatment of anaemia.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, making the development of self-management strategies crucial for preventing complications and improving clinical outcomes. This process involves symptom monitoring, treatment adherence, emotional management and a healthy lifestyle, among others. Reliable instruments are necessary to measure self-management, requiring robust psychometric properties. In this way, this COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-based systematic review aims to assess the quality of specific self-management instruments for adults with CVDs.

This systematic review will follow the COSMIN and be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol. Searches will be conducted in seven databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additionally, a manual search will be performed on PROQOLID, PROMIS and The Medical Outcome Trust websites. Studies on the development and validation of patient-reported instruments measuring specific self-management for individuals with CVDs will be included, without language or date restrictions. The search will be performed in November 2025, with the final version of the review expected to be completed in October 2026. Data extraction will follow COSMIN recommendations. The Modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to determine the quality of evidence. Instruments will be categorised according to COSMIN recommendations. All steps will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer involved in case of discrepancies. Additionally, the content of the instruments will be analysed and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, following international recommendations.

This study does not require ethics committee approval as it is a review of published data. The review results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

CRD42024605969.

Addressing physical inactivity is a promising dementia risk reduction strategy due to its direct benefits for brain health, and indirect benefits for other modifiable dementia risk factors. A potential limitation of previous interventions is that they often overlook how increasing physical activity affects other behaviours throughout the 24-hour day, such as sleep and sedentary behaviour, which are also important for brain health. Further, interventions are rarely tailored to the individual, considering their needs, preferences and constraints that may serve as barriers or facilitators to behaviour change. The current phase I randomised controlled trial, Small Steps, aims to investigate feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a personalised 24-hour time-use intervention to improve lifestyle and cognitive health in older adults.

Participants aged ≥65 years from Adelaide, South Australia will be recruited and randomised to either the Extended or Condensed programme. During the first 12 weeks, participants in the Extended programme will use a tailored website to set personalised weekly goals to move towards their ‘optimal’ 24-hour day for brain health, facilitated by weekly website ‘check-ins’ and weekly phone calls with a research staff member. Participants randomised to the Condensed programme will have access to the website educational resources only but will not undergo personalised goal setting or telephone calls. Following the introductory phase (first 12 weeks), phone calls will be gradually withdrawn for the Extended programme. Primary (feasibility and acceptability) and secondary outcomes (changes in time use, cognitive function and behaviour change metrics) will be assessed 12, 24 and 36 weeks after the beginning of the intervention.

Ethics approval has been obtained from the University of South Australia’s Human Research Ethics Committee (205989). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference presentations, media releases and community engagement.

NCT06291909).

Despite the growing volume of research in surgical education (SurgED), the integration of evidence into teaching practice remains fragmented and inconsistent. A structured and continuously updated synthesis is needed to support data-informed curriculum development and promote best practices across training programmes.

This protocol describes the development of a living systematic review and evidence map of SurgED research. Studies will be identified through comprehensive searches of CENTRAL, PubMed and Web of Science, and screened independently by two reviewers, supported by an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted screening tool to improve efficiency. Eligible studies will include both quantitative and qualitative designs involving medical students, surgical residents and faculty. Studies will be categorised across key educational domains such as simulation-based training, competency-based assessment, feedback, mentoring and technology-enhanced learning. The evidence map will be updated at least quarterly, with new studies screened and added in near real-time to ensure that the map remains current and actionable.

As this study does not involve human participants, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at national and international conferences and open access integration into the Evidence at a glance (EVIglance) evidence platform.

To ascertain the clinical impact, prevalence and associated determinants of delayed treatment intensification, defined as delaying the escalation of treatment plans for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus who fail to attain ideal glycaemic control, at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialised Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia.

A mixed-methods study.

University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialised Hospital.

420 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control after the index date were included in this study. A simple random sampling technique was employed to select the required sample size. Data were collected retrospectively and entered into EpiData V.4.6 and exported to Stata V.14.2 for analysis.

Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with delayed treatment intensification. A p value of 0.05 in the multivariable analysis was considered statistically significant. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with eight selected healthcare providers, and thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the underlying barriers to timely treatment intensification.

Delayed treatment intensification.

The prevalence of delayed treatment intensification was 51.4% (95% CI 46.6% to 56.2%), with a median delay of 14 months (IQR: 7.5–42 months) from the index date. Among those experiencing delayed treatment intensification, 43.1% developed new chronic diabetic complications, including retinopathy (18.1%), neuropathy (14.4%) and nephropathy (6.0%). Other complications (hypertension, stroke, heart failure and diabetic foot ulcer) accounted for 4.64% of the cases. Significant predictors of delayed treatment intensification included longer duration of diabetes (adjusted ORs (AOR) 1.68; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.5), presence of comorbidities (AOR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04 to 3.2) and use of cardioprotective medications (AOR 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.43). The qualitative findings revealed additional barriers contributing to delayed treatment intensification, including financial limitations, insufficient patient awareness and non-adherence among patients. Additionally, healthcare provider-related factors, including professional fatigue and knowledge gaps, as well as health institution-related factors such as inadequate healthcare infrastructure.

This study found a high prevalence of delayed treatment intensification (51.4%), associated with comorbidities, longer disease duration, low patient awareness, cardioprotective drug use and barriers related to the system and providers. To address these gaps, priorities should include strengthening patient education, scheduling regular reviews for high-risk patients and improving clinical decision support tools for timely treatment intensification. Enhancing healthcare infrastructure, such as medication supply and diagnostic services, and offering refresher training to reduce provider fatigue, are also crucial for improving the delivery of diabetes care.

Assess the magnitude of adverse pregnancy outcomes and associated factors among mothers who had operative vaginal delivery in Amhara Region Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, 2024.

A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 November 2024 to 20 February 2025.

Seven comprehensive specialised hospitals were included in the study.

The study was employed on 389 mothers who had operative vaginal delivery.

Systematic sampling was used. Data were collected via questionnaires, chart reviews and observation. Data were entered into Epi Data V.4.6 and analysed using V.25 statistical package of social sciences. Variables with p

Adverse pregnancy outcomes of operative vaginal delivery.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes of operative vaginal delivery were 42.2%. Among them, 46 (11.8%) had only maternal complications, 55 (14.1%) had only neonatal complications and 63 (16.2%) had both maternal and neonatal complications. Perineal tear 29 (7.5%) and episiotomy extension 31 (8%) were the most common maternal complications, while caput succedaneum 45 (11.6%) was the most neonatal complication. The most common indication of operative vaginal delivery was prolonged second stage 203 (52.2%). Vacuum-assisted delivery (AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96), two tractions (AOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.90), birth weight less than 2.5 kg (AOR 1.85; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.83) and mid fetal station (AOR 2.9; 95% CI 1.49 to 5.64) were significantly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes following operative vaginal delivery were high. Type of instrumental vaginal delivery, number of tractions, fetal birth weight and fetal station were significantly increased risks. Therefore, operators should minimise traction attempts during operative vaginal delivery to reduce adverse outcomes.

To develop and validate a risk prediction model for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) to enable early identification of at-risk women and support clinical decision-making in North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia.

A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study.

Six public hospitals in the North Wollo Zone, Northern Ethiopia.

A total of 1098 pregnant women were included in the study using systematic random sampling.

Occurrence of PPROM.

Data were collected between 20 November 2023 and 20 March 2024, using structured interviews and medical record reviews. A risk prediction model was developed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and logistic regression. Model performance was assessed through area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation was conducted via bootstrap resampling. A simplified risk score was created to categorise women into high-risk and low-risk groups, and its clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

Among the 1098 participants (100% response rate), the mean age was 21.54 years (IQR: 18–26), with 57.2% aged 20–34 years. The prevalence of PPROM was 10.75% (95% CI 9.01% to 12.77%). Seven significant predictors were identified: maternal age

PPROM remains a significant obstetric complication in the study area. The validated risk prediction model showed moderate to good performance and can be used to support early screening and risk-based management in antenatal care (ANC). Integrating the tool into routine ANC services, along with health education and management of modifiable risk factors, may help reduce PPROM-related adverse outcomes. Further external validation is recommended.

This study aims to assess parents’ knowledge and attitude towards the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of their daughters and the associated factors in Debre Tabor town, northwest Ethiopia.

A community-based cross-sectional study.

Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia.

A total of 702 participants were included in the study, with a response rate of 98.2%. Three out of the six kebeles in the town were randomly selected, and participants within the selected kebeles were recruited through a cluster sampling technique. An interviewer-administered structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 15 December 2021 to 15 February 2022.

Parents’ level of knowledge and attitude towards the HPV vaccination of their daughters, and the associated factors.

In the study, parents’ knowledge and attitude towards HPV vaccination were found to be 46.4% (95% CI 42.7% to 50.1%) and 61.5% (95% CI 58.0% to 65.2%), respectively. Parents with a higher level of education (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.27; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.69), media exposure (AOR=3.36; 95% CI 1.21 to 9.33) and a good attitude towards the HPV vaccine (AOR=8.81; 95% CI 5.78 to 13.44) were significantly associated factors that affect parents’ level of knowledge. Positive subjective norms (AOR=1.53; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.31) and perceived behavioural control towards the HPV vaccine (AOR=3.48; 95% CI 2.37 to 5.10) had statistically significant associations with parents’ attitude.

In this study, more than half of parents had poor knowledge of the HPV and its vaccination, while the majority of the participants showed a favourable attitude to the vaccine. Educational attainment, media exposure and a positive attitude were significantly associated with parental knowledge, and parents’ attitude was positively influenced by subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. This suggests a need to increase the parents’ level of awareness through educational interventions, particularly via media and community engagement. To improve the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccination, it is important to address negative attitudes and common misconceptions among parents on the safety, efficacy and necessity of the vaccine for their daughters.

This study aims to assess how implementing a checklist for managing extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight infants can reduce mortality rates and morbidities.

A quasi-experimental, before-and-after study.

Neonatal intensive care unit at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, a national referral hospital in Indonesia.

86 infants were born at

Implementation of a modified Canberra Health Services extremely preterm-early management checklist during the initial management of extremely preterm or low birth weight infants, including humidified gas resuscitation, thermal management, early surfactant administration and standardised first-hour care protocols.

The primary outcome was the mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included comorbidities such as hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, acidosis, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

A total of 86 extremely premature and/or extremely low birth weight infants were enrolled, 48 neonates prior to and 38 neonates after the use of the checklist. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (median gestational age 27 weeks in both groups, median birth weight 795 g vs 868.5 g, p=0.09). Mortality at discharge showed a non-significant reduction from 52.1% to 47.4% (p=0.664, 0.91, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.30). Significant reductions were observed in IVH (79.2% to 28.9%, p

Implementation of a systematic checklist was associated with significant reductions in IVH and ROP, though mortality reduction was not statistically significant. These findings suggest potential benefits of structured early care protocols, but the observational design limits causal inference.

To evaluate an innovative approach to recruit 40 hospitals to a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) to improve discharge antibiotic prescribing.

This study describes the design, implementation and impact of a theory-informed recruitment approach for hospitals participating in the Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics at Discharge (ROAD) Home trial.

An inperson meeting of a quality improvement collaborative of acute care hospitals in the state of Michigan.

Representatives from acute care hospitals that are part of the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium.

Small group recruitment sessions that combined deliberative participation and credible messengers to recruit hospitals to participate in a cluster RCT on a single date (1 November 2023).

The primary outcome was the number of hospitals which agreed to participate in the trial. We also assessed participant feedback, effectiveness of recruitment methods and resources required for implementation of this approach.

We recruited 51 (74%) of 69 eligible hospitals. Survey participants reported: sessions made clear the purpose of the trial (94%, 64/68) and time commitment required (87%, 59/68); agreed deliberative participation was helpful (82%, 56/68) and were ‘very satisfied’ with the session (82%, 56/68). Investigators largely reported credible messengers were a positive influence, though this varied across sessions. Hospital recruitment was time intensive, taking 179.5 total person hours. The recruitment process involved 3 months of preparation for the sessions and 2 months of follow-up prior to closing recruitment.

We demonstrated the feasibility and impact of a novel approach to recruit hospitals from an existing collaborative to a cluster RCT using the principles of deliberative participation and credible messengers. While the approach was time-consuming, we achieved success at over-recruiting hospitals in a relatively short period of time. Strategies presented here may assist future trial organisers in implementing hospital-based cluster RCTs.

The ROAD Home trial is registered on Clinical.Trials.gov (NCT06106204).

Early and balanced replacement of blood products appears to be the key factor in improving outcomes of major bleeding patients including acute trauma, cardiac, obstetric and transplant surgery patients. Definitive clinical guidance regarding the optimal ratio of blood products, including those containing fibrinogen, is still lacking. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the fibrinogen content to erythrocyte suspension ratio improves the mortality and functional outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries with expected major bleeding.

The Approximate Dose-Equivalent of Fibrinogen-to-Erythrocyte Suspension (ADEFES) ratio is a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of patients undergoing major surgical procedures with expected major perioperative bleeding (ie, requiring packed red blood cells (PRBC)>4U/24 hours). For 5U of cryoprecipitate and 1.5 U of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), the approximate dose-equivalent for fibrinogen is considered as 1 gram of fibrinogen. Association of the ADEFES ratio at 24 hours will be assessed on the primary objective, which will consist of the composite of 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day bleeding-specific mortality and the ‘highly-dependent scores’ of Katz index of independence in activities of daily living.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital (approval no. E2-23-4265, dated 07 June 2023; Chair: Prof. Dr. F.E. Canpolat) and by the institutional review boards of all participating centres. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines, as well as in compliance with national regulations on data protection and Good Clinical Practice standards. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.

The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals, presentations at national and international conferences, and communication with relevant stakeholders including clinical practitioners and healthcare institutions. If applicable, study outcomes will also be shared via institutional newsletters and digital platforms to reach a broader audience in the medical community.

NCT06021184.

The healthcare system is complex, involving multiple interactions among individuals, organisations and systems. Many patients, particularly those with limited health system literacy, struggle to navigate it. A reliable instrument is crucial for accurately measuring individuals’ navigational abilities. However, a systematic review of psychometric properties of existing instruments for measuring health system literacy has not been conducted. This review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of methodological quality and measurement properties of these instruments.

A search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA Psyfor, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar from the date the database was created to 14 December 2024. Eligible studies include those published in English and focusing on developing and validating an instrument for measuring the construct of health system literacy in adults aged 18 or older. Two researchers will independently review, select and extract eligible studies, while all members of the research team will be involved in assessing methodological quality and the quality of measurement properties. This systematic review will adhere to the Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) guidelines for conducting systematic reviews of psychometric properties. We will provide summary tables of study characteristics and instrument characteristics used to measure health system literacy. Measurement properties and their quality will be assessed using the COSMIN standard criteria and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We will also evaluate methodological quality of measurement properties using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist.

This review does not collect original data, so obtaining ethical approval is not applicable. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, which can assist researchers and providers in choosing the appropriate instrument measuring health system literacy.

CRD420251004362.

Depression, affecting 350 million people globally, is notably prevalent among medical students, particularly in South Asia, including Bangladesh. Despite several studies, no meta-analysis has systematically examined the prevalence and contributing factors of depression to address the mental health burden. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol aims to consolidate findings on the regional prevalence and key risk factors among Bangladeshi medical students.

The research team will search the Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, Web of science, Embase, PsycInfo, BanglaJOL and Google Scholar electronic databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for published studies from their inception till 1^St March 2025, using truncated and phrase-searched keywords and relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSHs). Observational studies, including cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies published within the timeframe and following any validated depression assessment tools, with no language restriction, reporting bangladeshi medical students, will be included for the review. Review papers, intervention studies, commentaries, preprints, meeting abstracts, protocols, unpublished studies and letters will be excluded. Two independent reviewers (SS, IA) will screen the retrieved papers using Rayyan, a web-based application, while any disagreements between them will be resolved by a third reviewer (ATS). Exposure will refer to different factors associated with depression among Bangladeshi medical students. Prevalence of depression and associated factors will be extracted. Narrative synthesis (Qualitative information) and meta-analysis (Quantitative data) will be conducted to assess the pooled prevalence using the random-effects meta-analysis (REML) model. For enhanced visualisation of the included studies, forest and funnel plots will be constructed. Heterogeneity among the studies will be assessed using the I ² statistic, sensitivity,and subgroup analyses will be conducted, if necessary, based on study heterogeneity. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (mNOS) tool developed for observational study designs. All statistical analyses and visualization will be conducted using the R studio v.4.3.2 with built-in "meta"-packages and GraphPad Prism v.9.0.2.

This review will analyse existing published evidence. Findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated through conferences, policy forums and stakeholders to guide future research and interventions.

CRD 420251006480.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and management of influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) in the outpatient and inpatient settings in Vietnam.

A cross-sectional, observational study.

We conducted a questionnaire survey of 407 individuals with ILI symptoms who presented to public community health centres and the paediatric ward of a public hospital in the city of Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam, from December 2022 to March 2023.

Not applicable.

No primary and secondary outcomes were pre-specified because this study was an explanatory study. The basic characteristics of the participants are presented using descriptive statistics. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the factors associated with the prescription of antibiotics to outpatients with ILIs.

A total of 198 outpatients and 200 inpatients were enrolled in the study. Most inpatients were children under 5 years of age and experienced longer illness durations and higher costs, with almost all patients receiving antibiotics. The rate of antimicrobial prescription for ILIs was 79.3% for outpatients and 99.5% for inpatients. The median health-related quality of life score of participants aged ≥18 years during illness was 0.796 (IQR 0.674–0.922). Logistic regression analysis indicated a negative association between a definite diagnosis of viral infection by rapid diagnostic test and outpatient antibiotic prescription (OR: 0.20, p=0.006).

This study underscores the widespread inappropriate antimicrobial use for ILIs in a community in Vietnam, which contributes to an avoidable economic and health burden. The results of this study suggest that implementing diagnostic tools may support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

There is high interest in long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), with many conveniences for uptake and persistence. However, both patients and clinicians have expressed important barriers to effective implementation, including concerns about frequent clinic visits and strain on clinic resources. Administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector (such as family, friend or partner of the patient) can help mitigate some of these patient-identified and clinician-identified barriers. Alternative LAI-ART delivery methods have the potential to increase the PWH and layperson injector’s confidence, empowerment, convenience, privacy and self-management skills and ultimately facilitate LAI-ART uptake and persistence.

INVITE-Home (innovative administration of long-acting injectables for HIV treatment enhancement at home) will support the expansion of LAI-ART in non-clinical settings by developing, implementing and evaluating a comprehensive, theory-informed training to support the administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector. First, INVITE-Home will design and develop an innovative, theory-based layperson injector training to improve acceptability and uptake of LAI-ART in home-based settings, grounded in qualitative evaluation of training barriers and needs of PWH, layperson injectors and clinicians to develop the training. In Aim 2, INVITE-Home will enhance understanding of home-based LAI-ART using the training, by examining implementation and effectiveness of home-based LAI-ART injections.

This study and its protocols have been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Review Board and the scientific staff of HIV Research Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Study staff will disseminate findings locally (eg, to partnering clinics, via the UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies’ Community Engagement Core), statewide (eg, the California Department of Public Health’s Office of AIDS) and nationally at conferences related to HIV.

NCT06488846.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among pregnant women in Sri Lanka and examine the association between NCDs and maternal and fetal outcomes.

A hospital-based, descriptive cross-sectional study.

The study was conducted in three tertiary care hospitals in the Western Province and one intermediate obstetrics care facility in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka, encompassing diverse, multiethnic populations, over 3 months.

Data from 1350 pregnant women were collected from discharged bed head tickets of the postnatal obstetric wards using a standardised checklist.

The primary outcomes were the prevalence of NCDs. Secondary outcomes included associations between maternal NCDs and adverse fetal outcomes such as preterm births and neonatal complications.

Among the participants, 68.5% (n=926) had one or more NCDs, with anaemia (37.9%), obesity (18.1%), gestational diabetes mellitus (14.9%) and hypertensive disorders (13.6%) being the most prevalent. Women with NCDs were at significantly higher odds of adverse fetal outcomes, including preterm birth (OR=2.3, 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.4), neonatal sepsis (OR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.04) and hypoglycaemia (OR=3.5, 95% CI: 1.2 to 10.0). Maternal complications, including postpartum haemorrhage (3.3%) and placental abruption (0.7%), were also more frequent in this group.

NCDs are highly prevalent among pregnant women in Sri Lanka and are significantly associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Enhanced screening and management strategies during antenatal care are essential to mitigate risks and improve health outcomes, aligning with global efforts to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Most older adults living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) have at least one marker of potentially suboptimal prescribing. Pharmacists play a crucial role in medication management, with their effectiveness enhanced by using computerised decision support tools. The Pharmacists Review to Optimise Medicines in Residential Aged Care (PROMPT-RC) study aims to optimise medicine use by providing pharmacists in RACFs with an electronic medicine management app with integrated decision support (AusTAPER App/Pathway) to use as part of medication reviews they undertake.

The PROMPT-RC study is a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial design involving Australian RACFs. It will assess if pharmacists’ use of the AusTAPER App/Pathway for medication reviews improves medication regimens for RACF residents compared with usual care. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the intervention arm will be trained to use the AusTAPER App/Pathway, which flags potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) across a person’s entire medicine regimen. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the control arm will not have access to the AusTAPER App/Pathway—they will continue to provide usual care. The primary outcome is the difference in the number of regular medicines between treatment arms at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will measure the number of regular and pro re nata medicines, PIMs, medicine administration times, medicine regimen complexity, use of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines, quality of life, mortality, instances of physical restraint, and the number of falls, hospitalisations and general practitioner/health professional visits. The cost-effectiveness of the AusTAPER App/Pathway compared with usual care will be calculated. Data collection will occur at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postrandomisation and 3 and 6 months prebaseline. We aim to recruit 668 participants to adjust for an estimated 10% loss to follow-up, giving 334 participants in each arm. Data analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model.

Ethical approval was obtained from The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 2024/ET000525; approved 14 August 2024). Reciprocal approval was also obtained in other states. This study is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://anzctr.org.au). Trial findings will be disseminated through national and international peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

ACTRN12624001409561.

As the population ages, the prevalence of dementia has increased.1 Due to interruption in activities of...