Bangladesh is highly prone to recurrent flooding that disrupts all four pillars of food security. This study aimed to explore the effect of household food insecurity on the underweight status of women in flood-affected areas of Bangladesh, which remains underexplored.

This is a cross-sectional analysis.

This study was conducted in eight sub-districts (upazilas) across eight districts in Bangladesh that experience severe to moderate river flooding, flash floods and substantial tidal surges.

A total of 532 women participated in the study. The inclusion criteria for participation were as follows: (1) being at least 18 years of age, (2) residing in the household for at least 1 year and (3) having experienced limited food access in the 4 weeks before data collection due to flood-related constraints.

Household food insecurity was measured using the U.S. Agency for International Development Household Food Insecurity Access Scale questionnaire. An underweight status was evaluated through anthropometric measurements of women. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were estimated using robust log-linear models.

Moderate food insecurity was the most common (58.3%) among the participants. The prevalence of underweight was the highest (52.1%) in the severely food-insecure group and decreased significantly with improved food security. Severe household food insecurity was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of underweight individuals (aPR = 4.12; 95% CI, 1.60 to 10.60). An underweight status was also prevalent in women from moderately food-insecure households (aPR = 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.55).

This study reveals a significant association between household food insecurity and underweight status, highlighting the major challenges faced by women living in flood-prone areas of Bangladesh. These findings emphasise the urgent need to address household food insecurity to improve nutritional outcomes for women in vulnerable communities.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an emerging public health concern in low and middle-income countries, including Nigeria, because of the associated pregnancy complications, increased healthcare costs and long-term health sequelae among women of reproductive age and their offspring. We determined the cumulative incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of GDM in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Prospective cohort study.

Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.

721 pregnant women from the Ibadan Pregnancy Cohort Study participated in the one-step 75 g-oral glucose tolerance test at 24–28 weeks’ gestation.

The primary outcome of the study is the cumulative incidence of GDM. GDM was diagnosed according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy outcomes, which included modes of delivery (CS, spontaneous vaginal delivery), macrosomia (birth weight ≥4.0 kg), gestational age at delivery and birth asphyxia. The risk factors (exposures) examined included sociodemographic, obstetric, clinical, behavioural and lifestyle factors. Bivariate and multivariate Log-binomial regression models were used to identify the independent risk factors of GDM (adjusted for maternal age ≥35 years, income, maternal body mass index, history of pregnancy loss and congenital anomaly) and the associated pregnancy outcomes of GDM (adjusted for maternal age, income and maternal body mass index). Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% CI, used to assess the strength of associations, were reported.

The cumulative incidence of GDM was 20.7%, 95% CI (17.9% to 23.9%). The mean time for the diagnosis of GDM is 25.4±1.42 weeks of gestation. After adjusting for other variables, maternal age ≥35 years: (aRR: 1.48). 95% CI (1.07 to 1.97) p=0.016), maternal obesity (aRR: 1.85, 95% CI (1.26 to 2.30) p=0.002) and a previous history of congenital anomaly (aRR: 2.83, 95% CI (1.97 to 4.07) p

The cumulative incidence of GDM is high among pregnant women in Ibadan. Maternal age ≥35 years, maternal obesity and a history of congenital anomaly were significant independent risk factors for GDM. These factors should be targeted for public health interventions, including lifestyle modification among pregnant women with obesity and early screening and diagnosis of GDM.

Despite the potential benefits of physiotherapy and physical activity, awareness remains limited among patients with sequela and healthcare professionals. This study aims to explore Danish physiotherapists’ (PTs) perspectives on barriers, facilitators and potential solutions to improve the care of sequelae after cancer in physiotherapy clinics.

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with Danish PTs, following a published research protocol and the Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Danish-speaking PTs working in private clinics in Denmark were eligible to participate and were selected via purposive sampling. Online interviews with PTs were conducted in June and July 2022.

A phenomenological approach was employed for data collection and thematic analysis, allowing researchers to set aside preconceptions. Preunderstandings were stated and revisited post-analysis for validation. The interview guide was developed and validated through discussions and pilot testing. A patient panel provided feedback on the interview guide. Interviews were conducted by a trained and experienced PT and transcribed using a standardised key.

Online interviews with 12 PTs were conducted. Five themes were identified: being aware of important physiotherapy competencies, PTs’ basic education and specialisation, patients’ resources, healthcare system and organisation, and sharing knowledge regarding sequelae from cancer and potential treatments. PTs emphasised the need for specialised competencies, emotional resilience and life experience. Patients experienced financial and psychosocial barriers, while systemic issues and poor communication hindered care. PTs suggested public lists of specialised providers and broader dissemination of knowledge to reduce stigma and improve access.

PTs identify clinical and systemic challenges requiring specialisation, improved collaboration and increased awareness to enhance rehabilitation and quality of life for cancer survivors.

Paediatric hospitalisation, encompassing the period from admission to discharge, often involves feelings of pain, fear and anxiety, primarily due to clinical diagnoses and, more significantly, discomfort and stress-inducing procedures. Numerous methodologies and interventions have been investigated and implemented to alleviate these phenomena during paediatric hospitalisation. Virtual reality (VR), for example, has demonstrated efficacy in pain relief for hospitalised children in recent studies. This systematic review, therefore, aims to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of VR in alleviating pain, fear and anxiety in hospitalised children undergoing painful procedures.

This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted in March and April 2025 across the following databases, with no restrictions on language or publication year: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies will include randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials involving children (aged 2–10 years) and adolescents (aged 10–18 years) who received VR interventions during painful procedures. Data will be managed and analysed using Review Manager software (RevMan 5.2.3). In cases of significant heterogeneity (I² > 50%), a random-effects model will be employed to combine studies and calculate the OR with a 95% CI. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

This study will solely review published data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This systematic review is expected to provide subsidies, evidence and insights into the use of VR. It is also anticipated that the results will directly impact the improvement of care for these patients and the qualification of professional care.

CRD42024568297.

The development of effective vaccines targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) has significantly contributed to disease prevention, highly relevant in immunosuppressed patients who have higher incidence of HPV-related cancers than their non-immunosuppressed counterparts. However, the acceptance and uptake of the HPV vaccine among immunosuppressed individuals pose unique challenges. Immunocompromised patients’ acceptance of the HPV vaccine is influenced by multifaceted factors, including concerns about safety and effectiveness, interactions with immunosuppressive medications and uncertainties due to their compromised immunity. This systematic review aims to identify the main factors influencing HPV vaccine acceptance among immunosuppressed patients.

A comprehensive search strategy will be executed across databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Cochrane Database. The review will encompass the three WHO-endorsed HPV vaccines (quadrivalent, bivalent and nonavalent) and will consider studies related to HPV vaccines and their administration. The scope includes study focusing on immunosuppressed patients who received organ transplants, cancer treatments or are HIV-positive. No temporal restrictions will be applied, and searches will be conducted until December 2025. Observational studies, including retrospective/prospective cohorts, case–control and cross-sectional studies, reporting factors influencing HPV vaccination in immunosuppressed populations will be included. Studies with overlapping patient populations will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, demographics, vaccine type, risk/protective factors, outcomes and medical history. Validation and cross-verification will ensure data accuracy. Risk of bias will be assessed using ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions), and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) will rate evidence certainty. Meta-analysis, guided by Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, will employ fixed/random-effects models, assessing heterogeneity using I² statistics.

This research will analyse previously published data, so ethical approval is not required. The results of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42023452537.

Acute pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is mostly treated with opioid analgesics. However, with the risk of adverse reactions and complications, strategies which do not involve opioid analgesics can be considered, such as aromatherapy. This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of aromatherapy in relieving pain in post-cardiac surgery patients.

Two researchers will independently and simultaneously conduct searches and select studies from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (Library) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.com), with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials on the use of aromatherapy for pain relief in postcardiac surgery patients will be included. Then, two researchers will independently examine the studies based on inclusion criteria, extract data from the included studies and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool from Cochrane. Data will be synthesised using Review Manager software. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The literature search, study selection, review and meta-analysis stages will be conducted from early October 2025 to April 2026.

This study is based on secondary data, and therefore ethical approval from a research ethics committee was not required. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

CRD42024568532.

Treatment of the two billion people with tuberculosis (TB) infection worldwide is crucial to prevent progression to TB disease and thereby prevent further transmission. However, TB is associated with fear and stigma, and knowledge gaps about TB disease are widespread, complicating adherence to treatment. As increasing knowledge about TB can reduce stigma and increase adherence to treatment, we developed an educational film about TB infection and disease. After showing the film to people with TB, our qualitative study aimed to evaluate the film and to explore perceptions, fears and possible knowledge gaps.

We conducted a qualitative study, with in-depth interviews (n=13), at two Infectious Disease Outpatient Departments in Sweden. Included research participants were adults with TB infection or TB disease. After informed consent, the participants watched the film, available in Swedish, English, Somali and Tigrinya. Subsequently, in-depth interviews, using a topic guide, were conducted, transcribed, and a reflexive thematic analysis was performed.

All participants considered the film to be a valuable addition to the written and oral information they had previously received. Identified themes included the perception of TB infection being a deadly, non-curable disease, and many feared being contagious. However, the film challenged these fears and increased the understanding of TB infection being treatable and non-infectious. Another theme revealed that TB-related stigma was experienced in encounters with healthcare professionals in Sweden.

Our educational film was perceived to increase understanding about TB symptoms, transmission and treatment. Implementing the film in Infectious Disease Departments across Sweden may contribute to decreasing stigma and enhancing awareness of the importance of treatment adherence, an outcome that warrants further investigation post-implementation.

Infertility resulting from cancer treatment is known to be a major factor that reduces the quality of life of young cancer survivors. However, discussions and decision-making about fertility preservation before cancer treatment have been insufficient owing to barriers in the clinical field. In addition, selecting a fertility preservation option requires a complex decision-making process that considers not only medical information but also the patient’s values and preferences. Hence, an environment that more easily supports patient decision-making about fertility preservation needs to be created. Therefore, this protocol will develop and test a web-based decision aid (DA) for fertility preservation among young patients with cancer, considering patient preferences and values, evaluate acceptability and usability of the developed DA and assess its effectiveness.

This protocol outlines the development of a web-based DA for fertility preservation targeting females of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer. It includes alpha testing to evaluate the usability and acceptability of the DA, as well as beta testing to assess its effectiveness outside of clinical settings, both based on an online survey. The web-based DA for fertility preservation consists of three modules: 1) an information collection module, 2) an option suggestion module and 3) a value communication module. The information collection module collects information essential to select appropriate fertility preservation options. The option suggestion module returns all applicable fertility preservation options based on the patient’s characteristics, which are essential for determining the appropriate option, such as menarche status and desire for pregnancy. The value communication module provides information on the extent to which each fertility preservation option satisfies the patient’s values and preferences. After the development of the DA, a small group of young patients with cancer (n=10) and health providers (n=5) will be asked to use this web-based DA for fertility preservation and assess the acceptability and usability of this DA based on a survey (alpha-testing). By reflecting the feedback of acceptability and usability testing, the DA will be updated for improvement, and clinical field testing (beta-testing pilot trial) will be performed using the updated DA. Beta-testing will be conducted on young patients with cancer (aged 18–40 years) before they receive any curative cancer treatment (n=32). These patients with cancer will be randomly allocated to the DA group (intervention group) or the usual care group (control group). The DA group will use the web-based DA before treatment, and the control group will not have access to the web-based DA and will be asked to decide whether to consult a fertility preservation specialist. The primary outcome of the beta testing will be the level of decisional conflict, and the secondary outcomes will include knowledge, decision self-efficacy, decision readiness, depression severity, quality of life, counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation. Outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge, decision self-efficacy, quality of life and depression severity, will be measured before the intervention (T0), 1 week after the intervention (T1) and 1 month after the intervention (T2). The readiness for decision-making will be assessed at T1 for the intervention group only. Counselling on fertility preservation and decision-making about fertility preservation will be assessed once after testing (T2) for both the intervention and control groups.

The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical standards and was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Cancer Centre, Korea (IRB No. NCC2024-0050). All study participants will provide written informed consent before participation. The results generated from this study will be presented at conferences or scientific meetings and disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT07038174 (beta-testing phase).

Discharge planning (DP) is essential to ensure continuity of care during patient transitions between inpatient and outpatient settings. Although DP has been legally required for all hospitals in Germany since 2017, several studies show considerable variation in its implementation, likely due to differences in structural characteristics and organisational processes. Both quality and efficiency-enhancing DP processes are particularly important in the context of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of mortality and a major contributor to healthcare costs in Germany. The ‘Ready to Discharge’ (R2D) project investigates the implementation status, influencing factors and outcomes of DP in cardiac units of German hospitals. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data, we aim to identify best practices and provide actionable recommendations for improving DP processes.

A mixed-methods study design will be used. Quantitative analyses will be based on primary data from hospital and patient surveys combined with secondary data from health insurance claims and hospital quality reports. Key outcome measures will include healthcare utilisation outcomes (eg, readmissions, emergency department visits), patient health status outcomes (eg, patient satisfaction, self-rated health) and medication-related outcomes (eg, medication adherence). Qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals will enrich the findings by providing insights into barriers and facilitators to DP.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Bergische University of Wuppertal and the German Federal Office for Social Security. Informed consent will be obtained for all primary data collections. Hospital managing directors will be informed prior to the hospital survey and will be able to withdraw consent. Patients can withdraw their consent at any time. Secondary data will be analysed in pseudonymised form to ensure patient confidentiality. Results will be disseminated through workshops, regional and international conferences and peer-reviewed publications.

Time-lapse imaging (TLI) systems for embryo incubation and assessment are hypothesised to improve the success rates of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment by providing undisturbed culture conditions for embryos and/or providing more information on embryo development (morphokinetic parameters) to improve predictive accuracy for embryo selection. Despite numerous aggregate meta-analyses showing uncertainty of benefit, IVF clinics globally continue to invest significant resources into this technology with little translation of evidence into guidelines or policy frameworks. This may be attributed to heterogeneity in participant populations and/or variations in the use of TLI, as highlighted in the aggregate meta-analyses.

Our research proposal for evidence synthesis using individual participant data meta-analysis will provide greater power than aggregate meta-analysis to detect differential treatment effects for effectiveness (live birth, clinical pregnancy) and safety (pregnancy loss, multiple births, congenital malformations) outcomes across three comparisons (overall effect, undisturbed culture and morphokinetic parameters). We will also analyse if there are specific subgroups of women who may benefit from the intervention and if variations in use of the intervention show any benefits. We have incorporated the results of the literature search used for the latest Cochrane review (7 January 2019) into this review and will include all the trials included therein. We will further update the literature search to include new evidence by searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL from 07/01/2019 to date, outcomes for all ongoing trials reported in the 2019 Cochrane review, trial registers for newer ongoing/completed trials and the citation lists of all the newly identified trials for any relevant references. The search strategy will include a combination of subject headings and text words relating to or describing the participants and the intervention, with no language restrictions. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts, and full text of articles retrieved from the search, to finalise a list of trials suitable for inclusion in the review. We will include randomised controlled trials that assess TLI systems for either undisturbed culture and/or use of morphokinetic parameters for embryo selection in women having IVF/ICSI treatment using their own oocytes.

Ethical approval is not required for this study. We plan to disseminate the findings of the research to all stakeholders, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and other international guideline development groups, through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentation at conferences, newsletters, meetings and websites of the funders, fertility charities and patient support groups.

CRD42024564332.

Amoxicillin is recommended for children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition (SAM). However, some trials have shown no difference in amoxicillin for nutritional recovery in children with SAM compared with placebo. In addition, amoxicillin treatment requires two times per day dosing for 7 days, which may influence adherence. Azithromycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that can be provided as a single dose and has reduced mortality in children aged 1–59 months when provided by mass drug administration. The AMOUR trial is designed to assess amoxicillin, azithromycin and placebo as part of outpatient treatment of uncomplicated SAM.

This double-masked randomised controlled trial will enrol 3000 children over 3 years in an individually randomised 1:1:1 allocation to azithromycin, amoxicillin or placebo arms and follow them for 12 months. Children eligible to enrol in the study will be aged 6–59 months and have uncomplicated non-oedematous SAM as defined by weight-for-height Z-score

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco (Protocol 23–39411) and the Comité d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (Protocol 2024-01-08). The results of this study will be disseminated to the Ministry of Health, community stakeholders and via peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

NCT06010719.

This study aimed to explore what intervention specificities or attributes newly diagnosed individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) find important and to explore possible reasons behind their evaluations.

A stepwise approach began with a systematic literature review to identify significant attributes. Patients with MS then assessed these attributes through an online survey, which included a ranking exercise and open-ended questions. Finally, the results were evaluated by the clinical team to select the most relevant factors for personalised care.

From June 2023 to December 2023, all consecutive patients referred to the MS Center of Careggi University Hospital were screened for inclusion. Following recruitment, cognitive and physical assessments were administered at the Don Gnocchi Centre. All participants were interviewed by an experienced neuropsychologist.

Participants were enrolled in the RELIABLE clinical trial, which included a ranking exercise and open-ended question. In the ranking exercise, patients prioritised levels of treatment attributes: treatment effects, methods of intervention, type of monitoring, monitoring, mode and mental support. The open-ended questions addressed the reasons behind the level rankings.

Participants’ rankings revealed the most important levels of each attribute. The highest-ranked method of intervention was disease-modifying treatment, which received 164 points. For mental support, individual psychotherapy was deemed most important with 149 points. Preservation of cognitive function, a key treatment effect, received 144 points. Clinical check-ups were the top type of monitoring with 129 points. Lastly, the hybrid mode of monitoring (half remote/half in-person) was ranked with 77 points. Open-ended responses provided insights into the reasons behind these preferences, emphasising the importance of maintaining mobility, cognitive function and emotional well-being. The clinical team evaluated these findings, confirming that the selected attributes were both clinically relevant and aligned with patient priorities. This evaluation process ensured that the treatment specificities chosen for individualised care were comprehensive and reflective of patient needs.

By identifying and prioritising key treatment attributes, this research highlights the multifaceted nature of MS management and emphasises the importance of aligning treatment options with patient preferences. Addressing these factors through further quantitative preference assessments is essential for preventative MS care, improving patient outcomes and promoting a more patient-centred approach to treatment.

Sarcopenia and frailty have been identified as negative predictors of health outcomes. Patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), knee osteoarthritis (OA) and breast cancer commonly experience low physical activity levels in the chronic phase of recovery. This prospective study aims to explore the feasibility of multimodal screening and longitudinal tracking of various biomarkers from the acute to chronic phase of disease to determine the relationship with frailty outcomes.

A prospective longitudinal observational cohort study involving Asian populations is planned over 3 years. Enrolled participants with index conditions of acute stroke, TBI, knee OA and breast cancer will be recruited from rehabilitation hospitals and clinics and followed longitudinally. Reference thresholds from the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia will be used. Variables include self-reported questionnaires, disease and comorbidity characteristics, anthropometric measurements, appetite questionnaires, muscle ultrasound (MUS), muscle/bone mass, blood biomarkers and markerless gait motion systems. In particular, physical performance (short physical performance battery and hand grip strength), sarcopenia (SARC-F questionnaire) and frailty assessment (FRAIL score, clinical frailty scale), four-region MUS, body composition analysis, dual X-ray absorptiometry, bone mineral densitometry, physical activity levels (International Physical Activity Questionnaire for the elderly [IPAQ-E], fitness trackers) and health-related quality of life assessment (EuroQoL-5D questionnaire five level [EQ5D-5L]) will be used. Blood biomarkers measuring metabolic health (eg, glycated haemoglobin, cholesterol, fasting glucose and 25-OH vitamin D) and inflammation (eg, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha [TNF-α] and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 [MCP-1]) will be measured at baseline. Data collection will take place at postrecruitment baseline (hospital admission), 1, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years postrecruitment (inpatient) and at postrecruitment baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 2 years postrecruitment (outpatient).

Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (2023/00105). Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in scientific journals.

NCT06073106.

Acute pain is commonly experienced by millions of patients who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. Moreover, an increasing number of procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, requiring greater postoperative planning to ensure effective pain management. Analgesic approaches commonly involve prescription opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but an optimal regimen that balances pain and adverse effects has not been identified. In addition, critical gaps in evidence exist regarding how opioids and NSAIDs compare as analgesic regimens after surgery.

The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES) trial is a pragmatic, international, multicentre randomised trial that enrols adults undergoing three elective surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, hernia repair). Participants are randomised to receive discharge analgesic prescriptions that consist of either NSAIDs or low-dose opioids (ie, 10 pills of oxycodone 5 mg or equivalent), with both groups prescribed acetaminophen around-the-clock. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported worst daily pain intensity over the first 7 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of opioid and/or NSAID side effects over the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are assessed by patient report and medical record review at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and include sleep disturbance, patient perception of improvement/change after treatment, pain interference, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, clinically important adverse events, substance use, opioid misuse, chronic pain, healthcare utilisation related to pain and quality of recovery.

Investigational review boards at the University of Michigan and other sites have approved the CARES trial. The first patient enrolled in CARES in February 2023, with recruitment anticipated through 2026. Dissemination builds on the input of patient partners and other members of an engaged Stakeholder Advisory Board, with activities spanning co-production of summaries to share results with study participants, publications in biomedical journals and lay press, presentations to scientific and community organisations, and other multimedia communication materials.

NCT05722002.