FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
Hoy — Diciembre 16th 2025Tus fuentes RSS

Nurses who return to work in clinical practice require bespoke support and development

Por: Barrett · D.

Commentary on: Yamamoto K, Nasu K, Nakayoshi Y, et al. Sustaining the nursing workforce - exploring enabling and motivating factors for the retention of returning nurses: a qualitative descriptive design. BMC Nurs 2024;23:248.

Implications for practice and research

  • The returning nurse workforce provides a valuable pool of experience, knowledge and skills.

  • Large-scale research is required into approaches that encourage nurses to return to the workforce and enable them to stay.

  • Context

    Shortages in the nursing workforce impact on the quality of patient care and pose a complex challenge for governments and healthcare organisations across the globe. There are estimated to be approximately 29 million nurses worldwide as of 2020, with a shortage of approximately 7 million against required levels. Despite growth in the workforce over the coming years, the nursing shortage is still projected to be 4.5M by 2030.1

    One approach to addressing...

    AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

    DIVINE-pilot trial: a phase 2 multicentre, randomised pilot trial of pharmacotherapy and physical activity monitoring conducted in women with recent gestational diabetes and increased risk of type 2 diabetes recruited from tertiary referral hospitals in A

    Por: Chen · A. X.-N. · Lee · V. Y. · Donges · K. · Giancas · C. · Angell · B. · Parmenter · B. · Barrett · H. L. · Henry · A. · Patel · A. · Arnott · C.
    Introduction

    Women who develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a 60% lifetime risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), which is already elevated within the first decade following childbirth. Despite the impact of lifestyle interventions to reduce long-term T2D risk in women with previous GDM, successful implementation of lifestyle interventions remains a barrier. Metformin is recommended for adults at increased risk of developing T2D; however, there is limited evidence of tolerability in the early postpartum period. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are effective at improving glycaemic status and body weight. However, GLP-1 RA have not been evaluated in the postpartum population. Finally, physical activity monitors may support behaviour changes related to physical activity to reduce long-term risk of T2D but are yet to be studied following GDM.

    Methods and analysis

    This will be a multicentre, randomised, open-label interventional pilot study. Using a 2x2 factorial design, we will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a pharmacotherapy intervention and a physical activity intervention in women with previous GDM at increased risk of developing T2D. Participants will be recruited from tertiary referral hospitals in Australia and will be randomised to receive either metformin alone or in combination with a GLP-1 RA and subsequently randomised to either a physical activity intervention involving activity monitor use, or usual care for 6 months, followed by a 6-month follow-up period. Primary feasibility outcomes include the acceptability and safety of the metformin and GLP-1 RA as measured through pill and injection counts, acceptability questionnaire and adverse events.

    Ethics and dissemination

    This trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration Number: ACTRN12624001253594). This trial has received ethics approval from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval Number: 2024/ETH00042, protocol version v1.1, 28/02/2025).

    Trial registration number

    Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Registration Number: ACTRN12624001253594.

    Digital App for Speech and Health Monitoring Study (DASH): protocol for a prospective longitudinal case-control observational study for developing speech datasets in neurodegenerative disorders and dementia

    Por: Tam · J. · Weaver · C. · Ihenacho · A. · Newton · J. · Virgo · B. · Barrett · S. · Neale · J. · Perry · D. · Smith · A. · Chandran · S. · Watts · O. · Pal · S. · DASH Consortium · Ali · Baxter · Bozkhurt · Burr · Chandran · Chau · Clancy · Coupland · Devon · Entwistle-Thompson · Gardiner
    Introduction

    Neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) represent an unprecedented public health burden. These disorders are clinically heterogeneous and therapeutically challenging, but advances in discovery science and trial methodology offer hope for translation to new treatments. Against this background, there is an urgent unmet need for biomarkers to aid with early and accurate diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring throughout the care pathway and in clinical trials.

    Investigations routinely used in clinical care and trials are often invasive, expensive, time-consuming, subjective and ordinal. Speech data represent a potentially scalable, non-invasive, objective and quantifiable digital biomarker that can be acquired remotely and cost-efficiently using mobile devices, and analysed using state-of-the-art speech signal processing and machine learning approaches. This prospective case–control observational study of multiple NDDs aims to deliver a deeply clinically phenotyped longitudinal speech dataset to facilitate development and evaluation of speech biomarkers.

    Methods and analysis

    People living with dementia, motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease are eligible to participate. Healthy individuals (including relatives or carers of participants with neurological disease) are also eligible to participate as controls. Participants complete a study app with standardised speech recording tasks (including reading, free speech, picture description and verbal fluency tasks) and patient-reported outcome measures of quality of life and mood (EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level, Patient Health Questionnaire 2) every 2 months at home or in clinic. Participants also complete disease severity scales, cognitive screening tests and provide optional samples for blood-based biomarkers at baseline and then 6-monthly. Follow-up is scheduled for up to 24 months. Initially, 30 participants will be recruited to each group. Speech recordings and contemporaneous clinical data will be used to create a dataset for development and evaluation of novel speech-based diagnosis and monitoring algorithms.

    Ethics and dissemination

    Digital App for Speech and Health Monitoring Study was approved by the South Central—Hampshire B Ethics Committee (REC ref. 24/SC/0067), NHS Lothian (R&D ref. 2024/0034) and NHS Forth Valley (R&D ref. FV1494). Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Data from the study will be shared with other researchers and used to facilitate speech processing challenges for neurological disorders. Regular updates will be provided on the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic web page and social media platforms.

    Trial registration

    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06450418 (pre-results).

    Upper-limb rehabilitation interventions delivered by healthcare professionals for adult patients in the intensive care unit setting: protocol for a scoping review

    Por: Bruce · J. · Swingwood · E. · Barrett · S. · Dures · E.
    Introduction

    Post-intensive care syndrome affects up to 70% of adult intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, with ICU-acquired weakness contributing substantially to long-term disability. Despite evidence supporting early and structured rehabilitation to enhance physical recovery, targeted upper-limb rehabilitation approaches in the ICU remain comparatively underexplored. This scoping review will map and summarise existing evidence on upper-limb weakness and rehabilitation strategies delivered by healthcare professionals for critically ill adults.

    Methods and analysis

    This scoping review protocol has been developed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, ensuring transparent and comprehensive reporting. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The search will include studies published between March 2009 and August 2025, aligning with National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guideline CG83 (2009), which marked a major policy shift in ICU rehabilitation practice. Quantitative data will be summarised descriptively (eg, frequencies and proportions), while qualitative data will undergo thematic synthesis to identify patterns in experiences, perceptions and implementation of upper-limb rehabilitation. Grey literature (eg, OpenGrey and relevant conference proceedings) will also be screened to reduce publication bias. Rayyan AI software will be used to manage citation screening and reviewer collaboration; no artificial intelligence-assisted decision tools will be used to determine study inclusion.

    Ethics and dissemination

    As this review will synthesise previously published data, ethical approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and open-access platforms. Findings from this review will inform the development of evidence-based ICU rehabilitation guidelines and highlight priorities for future research to improve upper-limb recovery in critically ill adults.

    Study registration

    Open Science Framework (osf.io/j86nf).

    Training refugee and asylum-seeking doctors: a cohort study of the UK REACHE programme

    Por: Drovandi · A. · Barrett · S. · Kallingal · J. · Awan · A.
    Objective

    Refugee and asylum-seeking (RAS) doctors benefit from specialised support to achieve medical registration, though there is limited published evidence from programmes supporting them. This study describes the outcomes of the Refugee and Asylum Seekers Centre for Healthcare Professionals Education (REACHE), a UK-based comprehensive language, clinical and professionalism skills training programme in supporting RAS doctors.

    Design

    Prospective cohort study.

    Setting

    Single educational centre.

    Participants

    607 doctor learners admitted to the REACHE programme.

    Primary and secondary outcome measures

    Learner characteristics, demographics and learning journeys (including duration studying and examination pass rates) and alumni outcomes (including registration, specialties obtained and practice locations).

    Results

    Of 607 doctor learners having entered the programme, 109 are currently on the programme and 498 are alumni. Learners took a median 1.3 years between arriving in the UK and contacting REACHE, with a median 6.4 years of prior clinical experience. Learners had high first-attempt pass rates (≥85%) for occupational language and clinical examinations required for registration. Of the alumni, 258 (51.8%) completed the programme (median time of 2.1 years) and achieved registration for practice and National Health Service employment. Of those who left before completion, who had access to 10 year post-programme scaffolded support, nearly one quarter (53 of 228; 23.2%) also achieved registration. 82 alumni are on specialty registers.

    Conclusion

    Retraining programmes such as REACHE can effectively support RAS doctor requalification, providing the UK medical workforce with experienced professionals. Improved referral pathways, sustainable funding and incorporation into government health workforce strategies are expected to strengthen already substantial achievements of programmes such as REACHE.

    Intrinsic Influences on Medical Emergency Team Call Stand‐Down Decision‐Making: An Observational Study

    ABSTRACT

    Aim

    The aim of this research was to describe factors that influence Intensive Care Unit liaison nurses' decision to stand down a medical emergency team call response. The decision to end a medical emergency team response for a deteriorating patient is referred to as the medical emergency team call stand-down decision. Intensive Care Unit liaison nurses, also known internationally as critical care outreach nurses, make medical emergency team call stand-down decisions in complex and challenging clinical environments. However, the factors influencing these decisions are not well described in the literature.

    Design

    Exploratory descriptive qualitative study.

    Methods

    Seven Intensive Care Unit liaison nurses who attended medical emergency team calls in a large acute metropolitan tertiary referral public hospital, with a mature three-tiered rapid response system, were observed and interviewed. Observations of 50 medical emergency team call responses and 50 post medical emergency team call interviews were conducted between March 2022 and August 2022. Findings were analysed using inductive content analysis.

    Results

    Intensive Care Unit liaison nurse decisions to stand down MET call responses were influenced by three intrinsic factors: (1) propositional knowledge, (2) experiential knowledge, (3) situational knowledge and information processing styles. Intensive Care Unit liaison nurses utilised these intrinsic factors to support their decision to terminate medical emergency team call response.

    Conclusion

    This study explored the intrinsic influences on individual Intensive Care Unit liaison nurses in deciding to end a medical emergency team call. By highlighting these individual influences on decision-making, the findings may be used to support medical emergency team responders educational needs and identification of potential heuristics and biases inherent in clinical decision-making which contribute to adverse events.

    Patient or Public Contribution

    No patient or public contribution.

    Implications for Profession and/or Patient Care

    By understanding the influences on an individual's clinical decision-making, strategies can be put in place for educational development and support for experiential learning. The study highlights areas of potential bias and heuristic use that may lead to sub-optimal clinical decisions and increased risk for deteriorating patients. Research findings can be applied internationally to a range of rapid response systems and critical care outreach teams that respond to deteriorating patients.

    Reporting Method

    The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines were used for reporting this study.

    Canadian Adaptive Platform Trial of Treatments for COVID in Community Settings (CanTreatCOVID): protocol for a randomised controlled adaptive platform trial of treatments for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in community settings

    Por: Hosseini · B. · Condon · A. · da Costa · B. R. · Daley · P. · Greiver · M. · Jüni · P. · Lee · T. C. · McBrien · K. · McDonald · E. G. · Murthy · S. · Selby · P. · Andrew · M. · Aubrey-Bassler · K. · Barber · D. · Barrett · B. · Butler · C. C. · Crampton · N. · Dahrouge · S. · Damji · A.
    Introduction

    SARS-CoV-2 is now endemic and expected to remain a health threat, with new variants continuing to emerge and the potential for vaccines to become less effective. While effective vaccines and natural immunity have significantly reduced hospitalisations and the need for critical care, outpatient treatment options remain limited, and real-world evidence on their clinical and cost-effectiveness is lacking. In this paper, we present the design of the Canadian Adaptive Platform Trial of Treatments for COVID in Community Settings (CanTreatCOVID). By evaluating multiple treatment options in a pragmatic adaptive platform trial, this study will generate high-quality, generalisable evidence to inform clinical guidelines and healthcare decision-making.

    Methods and analysis

    CanTreatCOVID is an open-label, individually randomised, multicentre, national adaptive platform trial designed to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of therapeutics for non-hospitalised SARS-CoV-2 patients across Canada. Eligible participants must present with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, confirmed by PCR or rapid antigen testing (RAT), within 5 days of symptom onset. The trial targets two groups that are expected to be at higher risk of more severe disease: (1) individuals aged 50 years and older and (2) those aged 18–49 years with one or more comorbidities. CanTreatCOVID uses numerous approaches to recruit participants to the study, including a multifaceted public communication strategy and outreach through primary care, outpatient clinics and emergency departments. Participants are randomised to receive either usual care, including supportive and symptom-based management, or an investigational therapeutic selected by the Canadian COVID-19 Outpatient Therapeutics Committee. The first therapeutic arm evaluates nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid), administered two times per day for 5 days. The second therapeutic arm investigates a combination antioxidant therapy (selenium 300 µg, zinc 40 mg, lycopene 45 mg and vitamin C 1.5 g), administered for 10 days. The primary outcome is all-cause hospitalisation or death within 28 days of randomisation.

    Ethics and dissemination

    The CanTreatCOVID master protocol and subprotocols have been approved by Health Canada and local research ethics boards in the participating provinces across Canada. The results of the study will be disseminated to policy-makers, presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals to ensure that findings are accessible to the broader scientific and medical communities. This study was approved by the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board (#22-179) and Clinical Trials Ontario (Project ID 4133).

    Trial registration number

    NCT05614349

    Participative research for individualised care in cardiovascular diseases (PRIC-CVD): study protocol for a non-interventional, multicentre mixed-methods study as part of iCARE4CVD

    Por: Steiner · B. · Verket · M. · Baldewijns · K. · Murphy · M. · McNulty · A. · Schwertfeger · M. · Friedl · S. · Barrett · M. · Hill · L. · Brandts · J. · Romero · I. · Helms · T. M. · Brunner-La Rocca · H.-P. · Zippel-Schultz · B. · on behalf of the iCARE4CVD Consortium
    Introduction

    Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a public health burden, with high prevalence and significant morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based interventions exist, there is a need for more individualised care. The European project Individualised care from early risk of cardiovascular disease to established heart failure (iCARE4CVD) aims to personalise CVD prevention and treatment. Participatory health research, which actively involves patients in the planning, implementation and evaluation of projects, plays a crucial role here. However, patient participation is often unsuccessful due to the lack of a representative patient sample who is involved throughout the project’s duration, has knowledge of the project and can contribute their experience.

    Methods and analysis

    Participative Research for Individualised Care in Cardiovascular Diseases is a non-interventional, non-randomised, multicentre mixed-methods study. The aim is to incorporate patients’ insights into several key activities within iCARE4CVD by establishing country-specific patient panels in Belgium, Germany, Ireland and the UK. The primary objective is to identify patients’ preferences, experiences, requirements and needs for better diagnosis, treatment and self-care of CVD. Therefore, 10–12 patients across the CVD spectrum, from early risk to established CVD and heart failure, will be included in each country (40–48 in total). Over 3.5 years, patient panel members are required to complete four tasks: (1) identification of meaningful Patient-Reported Outcome and Experiences Measures, (2) development of a motivational model to increase adherence, (3) feedback on CVD care processes and (4) usability testing of new digital tools developed within iCARE4CVD. These tasks comprise eight activities in the form of paper-based or digital exercises, telephone surveys, written surveys and in-person focus groups. The results will be continuously incorporated into iCARE4CVD.

    Ethics and dissemination

    This study received ethical approval by the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine of RWTH Aachen University (EK 24-172) and St. Vincent’s University Hospital (RS24-027), Research Ethics Committee. In Geel and Belfast, positive ethics approval is pending. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment in the study and participation in the first patient panel task. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

    Trial registration number

    DRKS00034899.

    Protocol version

    V2.1, 6 June 2024.

    ❌