Conectar
To assess the quality of the Spanish Triage System performed by nurses according to the triage code assigned to each patient and to examine factors associated with the need for re-evaluation after completion of triage.
Retrospective longitudinal observational study.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients triaged in the emergency department between 2018 and 2023. Patients triaged by other healthcare professionals and those who did not receive a triage priority level were excluded.
493,211 episodes were analysed. Most were low/intermediate acuity (Level IV 65.4%, Level III 23.9%; Level I 0.1%). Mean time-to-first physician record entry increased as acuity decreased (38 min Level I vs. 81 min Level V), yet recorded time-target compliance was lowest in Levels I–II (23.8% and 14.7%). Re-evaluation occurred more often in high-acuity levels and was independently associated with older age, male sex, lower oxygen saturation and longer emergency department length of stay; compared with Level I, Levels II–III and lower adjusted odds of re-evaluation.
Nurse-led triage demonstrated coherent clinical and operational stratification; however, the lowest recorded time-target compliance in the sickest patients suggests a gap between immediate care and electronic documentation.
Streamline documentation workflows for high-acuity cases and use re-evaluation risk profiles to prioritize monitoring and escalation.
Evidence on nurse-led Spanish Triage System performance and time-documentation quality is limited. Acuity and flow metrics showed expected gradients, but target-time compliance was lowest in Levels I–II; predictors of re-evaluation were also identified. Findings support emergency department nursing, quality improvement and potential benefits for patients attending emergency departments.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Chronic heat stress and recurrent dehydration from strenuous labour in hot environments are recognised drivers of acute kidney injury among agricultural workers in Mesoamerica and may contribute to Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Aetiology (CKDu). This study explored how members of a long-term community-based cohort in northwest Nicaragua perceive, experience and adapt to extreme heat, within the broader context of environmental and labour changes.
This qualitative study used focus group discussions with participants from a community-based cohort followed for over a decade and community members. Transcripts were analysed thematically using an interpretative approach, with trustworthiness ensured through peer debriefing, audit trails, triangulation and achievement of thematic saturation.
Rural agricultural communities in northwest Nicaragua participating in a long-term community-based cohort.
Participants were purposively sampled from a prospective community-based cohort and community members were invited to participate. Men and women across different age groups were invited. In total, 91 adults aged ≥18 years participated in 11 face-to-face focus groups, each comprising 8–11 men or women.
Themes describing experiences of heat stress, occupational risk and adaptive responses among agricultural workers.
Participants described worsening heat linked to deforestation, unsafe and inadequate water access and unrealistic production targets that prioritised output over health. In response, workers reported adaptive practices including self-paced labour, hydration routines and peer monitoring. Community solidarity and mutual aid emerged as key sources of resilience despite structural constraints.
Heat stress amplifies occupational hazards and exacerbates health inequities among marginalised agricultural workers. Integrating climate adaptation and equity into labour protections—ensuring access to clean water, adequate shade and fair workloads—can strengthen resilience in agricultural communities facing rising heat-related health risks.
Split-thickness skin autografts are commonly used to treat extensive cutaneous defects. However, donor site morbidity, including pain, bleeding, and delayed epithelialization, remains a major clinical challenge. This study evaluates whether applying autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to the donor site improves healing outcomes. A prospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-level academic hospital in Colombia. The study protocol was approved by the local Institutional Ethics Committee. Adult patients (> 18 years) undergoing split-thickness skin grafts for trauma, burns, oncologic resections, or chronic ulcers were included. Two groups were compared: the PRP group, in which autologous platelet-rich plasma was applied to the donor site, and the control group, which received standard wound care. The primary outcome was the quality of epithelialization at the donor site, while pain, assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, was evaluated as a secondary outcome at multiple postoperative time points. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects models adjusted for potential confounders, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. A total of 46 patients were included (16 in the PRP group and 30 in the control group), with no significant demographic differences between groups. The PRP group demonstrated improved epithelialization quality, with lower Vancouver Scar Scale scores on postoperative days 7 and 14 (p < 0.05). Patients treated with PRP also reported a reduction of up to 50% in postoperative pain during early assessments (p < 0.001). These effects were maintained throughout the follow-up period, suggesting a sustained benefit of PRP on both healing quality and pain control. These findings suggest that autologous PRP application at split-thickness skin graft donor sites may enhance early epithelialization quality and reduce postoperative pain compared with standard wound care. PRP appears to be safe and may represent a useful adjunct to promote improved wound healing and patient recovery in reconstructive surgery. However, larger randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and to establish the clinical effectiveness of autologous PRP in this setting.
To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based interprofessional education (IPSE) interventions on teamwork, communication and psychological safety outcomes among healthcare professionals and students.
A systematic review.
Searches were conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL, supplemented by manual reference and citation tracking.
The search strategy was developed with an academic librarian to ensure thoroughness and relevance. The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies reported quantitative outcomes of IPSE interventions involving at least two healthcare professions. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for quasi-experimental studies.
Thirty studies (14 RCTs, 16 quasi-experimental) from 16 countries were included. Most studies reported positive effects on teamwork, including improved coordination, role clarity and adherence to structured protocols. Communication outcomes showed enhanced information exchange, clarity and structured behaviours, such as SBAR and closed-loop communication, although some studies noted inconsistent safety practices. Psychological safety outcomes demonstrated gains in self-confidence, self-efficacy, leadership and safety climate, with several studies also reporting reduced anxiety. However, findings on stress, workload and attitudinal change were mixed. Overall, RCTs were judged methodologically robust, and quasi-experimental studies were largely low risk with some moderate concerns.
Simulation-based interprofessional training enhances teamwork, communication and psychological safety in fostering a healthy work environment, though effects vary by context and population.
This review synthesises evidence from 30 trials, offering guidance for educators and policymakers on advancing interprofessional collaboration. Integrating IPSE into health curricula and clinical training can strengthen collaboration and contribute to safer patient care.
No patient or public contribution.
The review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the protocol was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (ID: CRD420251039410).
Objetivo. Resumir la literatura científica disponible sobre el uso de las intervenciones de telemedicina para actuar sobre el sedentarismo de los pacientes con Trastorno Mental Grave. Metodología. Revisión exploratoria o de alcance. Metodología: se realizaron y analizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos PubMed, CINAHL, Cuiden, Lilacs, Cochrane, APA PsycINFO. Se incluyeron finalmente 19 artículos. Resultados. 15 tenían metodología cuantitativa, 3 cualitativa y 1 enfoque mixto. Las patologías principales estudiadas fueron esquizofrenia, trastorno bipolar y trastorno depresivo mayor. Todos demostraron aplicaciones, utilidad e influencia de la telemedicina para tratar el sedentarismo y así aumentar la salud en la parte física, mental o social. Algunos estudios describieron problemas y dificultades señaladas por los pacientes, familiares y profesionales a nivel práctico. Una minoría de estudios analizaron la satisfacción de los usuarios con este tipo de intervenciones digitales, que se puede catalogar como media-alta. Discusión. Las intervenciones de telemedicina son usadas en la actualidad por los profesionales para medir mejor el nivel de sedentarismo. También como herramienta para mejorar la adherencia, realizar seguimiento del proceso de enfermedad y humanizar la asistencia sanitaria. Hay pocos estudios de investigación en esta materia. Se necesitan enfoques cuantitativos y cualitativos para aumentar el éxito de las intervenciones.
ABSTRACT
Objective. Summarize the available scientific literature on the use of telemedicine interventions to act on the sedentary lifestyle of patients with Severe Mental Illness. Methodology. Exploratory or scoping review. Methodology: searches were performed and analyzed in the PubMed, CINAHL, Cuiden, Lilacs, Cochrane, APA PsycINFO databases. Finally, 19 articles were included. Results. 15 had quantitative methodology, 3 qualitative and 1 mixed approach. The main pathologies studied were schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. All demonstrated applications, usefulness and influence of telemedicine to treat sedentary lifestyle and thus increase health in the physical, mental or social part. Some studies described problems and difficulties reported by patients, family members and professionals at a practical level. A minority of studies analyzed user satisfaction with this type of digital intervention, which can be classified as medium-high. Discussion. Telemedicine interventions are currently used by professionals to better measure the level of sedentary lifestyle. Also, as a tool to improve adherence, monitor the disease process and humanize healthcare. There are few research studies on this matter. Quantitative and qualitative approaches are needed to increase the success of interventions.
To develop and validate decision trees using conditional probabilities to identify the predictors of mortality and morbidity deterioration in trauma patients.
A quasi-experimental longitudinal study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center in São Paulo, Brazil.
The study analysed 201 patient records using standardised nursing documentation (NANDA International and Nursing Outcomes Classification). Decision trees were constructed using the chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) algorithm and validated through K-fold cross-validation to ensure model reliability.
Decision trees identified key predictors of survival and mobility deterioration. Patients who did not require (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status but required (NOC 0210) Transfer Performance had a 97.4% survival rate. Conversely, those requiring (NOC 0414) Cardiopulmonary Status had a 25% risk of worsening mobility, compared to 9% for those who did not. K-fold cross-validation confirmed the model's predictive accuracy, reinforcing the robustness of the decision tree approach (Value).
Decision trees demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for mobility outcomes and mortality risk, offering a structured, data-driven framework for clinical decision-making. These findings underscore the importance of early mobilisation, tailored rehabilitation interventions and assistive devices in improving patient recovery. This study is among the first to apply decision trees in this context, highlighting its novelty and potential to enhance trauma critical care practices.
This study highlights the potential of decision trees, a supervised machine learning method, in nursing practice by providing clear, evidence-based guidance for clinical decision-making. By enabling early identification of high-risk patients, decision trees facilitate timely interventions, reduce complications and support personalised rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient safety and recovery.
This research addresses the challenge of improving outcomes for critically ill and trauma patients with impaired mobility by identifying effective strategies for early mobilisation and rehabilitation. The integration of artificial intelligence-driven decision trees strengthens evidence-based nursing practice, enhances patient education and informs scalable interventions that reduce trauma-related complications. These findings have implications for healthcare providers, rehabilitation specialists and policymakers seeking to optimise trauma care and improve long-term patient outcomes.
Patients provided authorisation for the collection of their clinical data from medical records during hospitalisation.
To assess the impact of a nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme versus usual follow-up in patients who have suffered an acute coronary syndrome in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE), diet, physical exercise, smoking, emotional state, adherence to medical treatment, cardiometabolic profile and anthropometric parameters within one year of discharge.
Prospective, randomised, open-label, evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial.
Between October 17, 2017, and February 5, 2023, patients were randomly assigned to either a usual follow-up of two cardiology visits over 12 months or the nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme, which also included 5 nursing visits (one face-to-face and four remote).
At 12 months, the nurse-led remote prevention programme group (interventional group) had lower smoking rates, greater adherence to medication, greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, more physical activity, and better perceived health status compared to the usual follow-up group. The interventional group demonstrated a reduction in major adverse clinical events (20.7%) compared to the usual follow-up group (12.4%). This reduction was observed particularly in Acute Coronary Syndrome recurrence, all-cause hospitalisation, and hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes.
Patients randomised to the nurse-led remote prevention programme showed a significant reduction of the MACE, improved lifestyle, and medication adherence at 12 months compared to the usual follow-up group.
This study illustrates the feasibility and efficacy of a remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme led by advanced practice nurses in patients who have suffered an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CONSORT.
None.
The study was prospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03234023
To explore the impact of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) education on career advancement, job satisfaction, leadership competencies and contributions to healthcare systems.
The study utilised a scoping review methodology based on Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework.
The search strategy was developed with an academic librarian to ensure thoroughness and relevance. Seven databases were searched using MesH terms. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies examining DNP education's influence on career advancement, job satisfaction and leadership. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns and themes.
Studies were selected based on their focus on DNP-prepared nurses, nursing faculty or advanced practice nursing students in healthcare or academic settings, published between 2004 and 2024.
Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, highlighting DNP education's role in fostering leadership, professional development and evidence-based practice. Thematic analysis revealed the benefits of being a DNP graduate include contribution to professional development, contribution to leadership and contribution to the practice environment. The challenges to DNP graduates include underrecognition of competencies, high educational costs and limited academic opportunities that were also identified.
DNP education contributes to individual and professional growth, leadership development and healthcare system improvements. However, barriers such as financial constraints and inadequate recognition of DNP competencies must be addressed to maximise the impact of this educational model.
DNP education empowers nurses to lead healthcare innovations, enhance patient care quality and reduce disparities in health outcomes. Strengthening financial and systemic support for DNP graduates is essential for sustaining these contributions.
DNP education is a transformative force in nursing, offering significant opportunities for leadership development and healthcare advancements. Aligning DNP programmes with evolving global healthcare challenges can further strengthen their impact on the profession and patient care.
PRISMA-ScR guidelines were followed.
Long-term brain health profiles following exposure to repetitive head impacts and/or concussions in contact sports are a public health focus and the subject of a national debate. The true prevalence rates of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or neurobehavioural dysregulation are unknown in the nearly 20 000 current/living former professional football players. Here, we describe the procedures and methodology of the prevalence study of cognitive function in former professional football players from the Brain Health Initiative at the University of Pittsburgh. The objective is to define the prevalence of normal cognitive function versus neurodegeneration in former professional football players through clinical, neuroimaging and biomarker assessments.
Participants include former professional football players aged 29–59 years at study onset who played a minimum of three professional football games in three professional seasons and non-exposed controls. Participants are recruited by two mechanisms, a random and non-random sample. The full study protocol includes a 3–4-day, multidomain assessment (eg, neurological, neurocognitive, psychiatric, sleep, vestibular, orthopaedic and cardiovascular) for neurodegenerative disease and overall health and function, including MRI, positron emission tomography scans, analysis of blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, neurocognitive assessments, applanation tonometry, overnight sleep study and informant interview. A multidisciplinary clinical panel conducts a blinded diagnostic consensus conference to adjudicate the presence of MCI and/or traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, which serve as the study’s primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Point prevalence of these for both the exposed and unexposed cohorts will be calculated as the primary statistical analysis.
The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board approved the study prior to recruiting human subjects (protocol numbers STUDY19010008: sIRB - Brain Health Initiative (Part 1) and STUDY19030211: sIRB - Brain Health Initiative (Part 2)). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and as presentations at national and international scientific conferences.
Kerato-lenticule extraction (KLEx) is a refractive surgery technique that, in contrast with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), does not require the creation of a flap to correct refractive defects. The potential advantages of this technique are related to the absence of a flap and its complications. On the other hand, FS-LASIK is the most widely practised refractive surgery worldwide, as it offers excellent visual outcomes and is currently the gold standard of refractive surgery. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of KLEx versus FS-LASIK as a treatment option in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.
This double-masked, parallel-group, single-centre randomised clinical trial will enrol 80 eyes from adults with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism within the ranges sphere –0.50 to –12.00 D and cylinder –0.50 to –6.00 D, recruited at the Instituto de Oftalmología Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico. Participants will be allocated to KLEx or FS-LASIK and assessed at baseline and 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome is uncorrected visual acuity at all postoperative visits. Secondary outcomes include postoperative spherical equivalent, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), loss of ≥2 BCVA lines, the proportion of eyes within ±0.50 D of the refractive target, corneal aberrations over a 5 mm pupil, epithelial changes and adverse events. Participants and outcome assessors will be masked to the assigned surgical technique.
Participant confidentiality will be maintained with the publication of results. This study was approved by the research and ethics committee of the Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación de Asistencia Privada Conde Valenciana (CI-017-2024). The study results will be disseminated in scientific articles published in peer-reviewed journals and presented through research posters at national and international conferences.
ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT06477081).
Adenotonsillectomy is the primary treatment for type 1 obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA1). Although polysomnography (PSG) remains the gold standard for measuring Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index, it is a labour-intensive procedure and does not correlate with improvements in quality of life postadenotonsillectomy. Mouth breathing is associated with poorer quality of life in children. Mandibular movement (MM), which measures mouth opening, is a validated measure of respiratory effort that can be easily and safely assessed in children using the JAWAC technology. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between changes in quality of life and changes in mouth opening in children with OSA1 after undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Secondary objectives include evaluating changes in quality of life, clinical symptoms and other MM and PSG metrics in the same population.
This exploratory, non-randomised, monocentric, prospective cohort study with a non-blinded single arm will include 50 children aged 3–7 years, undergoing adenotonsillectomy at the Clinique Saint Jean, Montpellier, France. Quality of life will be measured using the parent version of the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory and MM metrics will be measured during PSG using the JAWAC system during the inclusion visit and 3 months after adenotonsillectomy. The primary outcome will be the correlation between the changes in quality of life and mouth opening (1/10 mm) postadenotonsillectomy. Secondary analyses will evaluate changes in clinical symptoms, PSG measures and other MM metrics including respiratory effort, as well as the associations between these measures.
This study was approved by an independent ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Est) on 24 March 2025 (2024-A02761-46) and will be conducted in accordance with French law, good clinical practice and the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Study findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journal articles as well as public, academic presentations at national and international conferences.
To provide an overview of doctoral programs in nursing offered in Ibero-American countries to inform regional collaboration and academic development.
This study was a descriptive, document analysis.
A systematic mapping was conducted using data obtained from official university and program websites, national postgraduate databases, and academic documents. The variables analysed included country, institution, year of implementation, number of faculty and students, course duration, delivery modality, costs, scholarship availability, internationalisation activities, and research lines.
A total of 94 active nursing doctoral programs were identified. Brazil emerged as the pioneer, launching the first doctoral program in 1982, and remains the regional leader, accounting for 43 programs. Most programs are offered by public institutions (76.6%), delivered primarily in face-to-face format (64.1%), and emphasise research (90.4%). There has been a consistent upward trend in the establishment of programs since 2000, with notable expansion between 2011 and 2025. Despite this progress, regional disparities persist, along with a lack of data standardisation and a limited presence of professional doctorates. While 69.1% of programs reported international activities, few offer joint or dual degrees. The most common thematic axis, “Health Care and Nursing,” proved to be broad and non-specific.
The study reveals the expanding landscape of nursing doctoral education in Ibero-America, while also exposing persistent challenges regarding access, curricular clarity and regional articulation.
Doctoral programs are essential for developing research capacity, academic leadership and evidence-based care. Strengthening these programs could enhance nursing responses to local health needs and promote scientific progress in care delivery.
This study provides the first comprehensive mapping of nursing doctoral programs in Ibero-America, highlighting regional disparities and areas for academic collaboration, with potential impact on policy-making, curriculum development, and the strengthening of research capacity in nursing education.
STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology).
No patient or public contribution.
by Ramón Ventura Roque Hernández, Rolando Salazar Hernandez, Adán López Mendoza
IntroductionThe widespread use of smartphones among university students has raised concern because of their potential effects and the need to detect profiles of problematic use. This study aimed to identify, characterize and differentiate different profiles of smartphone users in a sample of university students on the basis of variables such as use, nomophobia, risk and sociodemographic characteristics.
MethodsA total of 681 university students participated. A total of 681 university students participated in this study. The sample was recruited using a non-probabilistic, convenience sampling method. Latent class analysis -LCA- was performed to identify profiles from variables that included smartphone use patterns such as daily hours, messaging, social networks, browsing, history of technology adoption, situational use, NMPQ nomophobia questionnaire -a scale designed to assess the fear of being without a smartphone-, and reported consequences such as accidents, visual or musculoskeletal problems. The resulting classes were compared in subsequent analyses using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann‒Whitney U tests for ordinal variables.
ResultsLCA revealed two clearly differentiated user profiles. Class 1 (n = 348) grouped users with moderate use and less exposure to risks and was characterized by shorter daily use of smartphones (mean = 5.46 hours), significantly lower scores on the total scale of nomophobia (mean NMPQ = 65.4 out of 140 possible points, moderate level), a lower frequency of accidents reported due to mobile use and lower reports of visual and musculoskeletal health problems. Class 2 (n = 333) grouped users with high digital involvement and multiple vulnerabilities and showed a significantly more intensive use pattern (mean = 11.01 hours per day), higher levels of nomophobia (mean NMPQ = 74.3 out of 140 possible points, moderate level), and a higher frequency of accidents and major visual and musculoskeletal health problems.
ConclusionWhile both groups of undergraduate students could benefit from awareness and training programs, interventions could be differentiated and designed to mitigate the risks associated with problematic smartphone use. These findings provide evidence for higher education institutions and health professionals in the development of programs aimed at promoting digital well-being among university students.
Phasix mesh is a fully resorbable synthetic mesh for use in clean and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repairs. Long-term absorbable Phasix mesh appears to be a safe and promising device in incisional hernia repair, with low recurrence rates; however, data on long-term complications after surgery, particularly after the resorption period of the mesh, are scarce.
This protocol describes a study of several European registries on the use of a Phasix mesh in incisional hernia repair. The primary endpoint of the study is long-term complications at 2–5 year follow-up after mesh implantation, with secondary endpoints including hernia recurrence and complications during short-term follow-up.
Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as the study is based on anonymised registry data collected with prior patient consent in each registry. Each participating registry has its own ethical approval process, and this study will adhere to those regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
by Andrea Lopez-Soto, Esmeralda Ramírez, Duyen H. Vo, Aigerim Alpysbekova, Seo Woo Lee, Maria Duque, Lawrence Watkins, Cory L. Cobb, Beyhan Ertanir, Alejandra Garcia Isaza, Evelyn Gualdron, Sumeyra Sahbaz, Collette Steed, Neel Devan Youts, Shriya Senapathi, Seth J. Schwartz, Pablo Montero-Zamora
There is a limited understanding of how different subgroups of Latin American immigrant parents experience cultural stressors, as well as its impact on family dynamics, health behaviors, and mental health. The present study aimed to (1) identify latent cultural stress profiles among Latin American immigrant parents in the U.S. and (2) examine differences among these profiles concerning family intimacy, democratic parenting style, family conflict, hazardous alcohol use, and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Participants consisted of a sample of 1,351 parents (61.9% female; M age = 39.83, 62% first-generation; North America [61%], Central America and the Caribbean [21%], and South America [19%]) of children aged 8–16. We used latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of cultural stress, defined by perceived discrimination (PDS) and negative context of reception (NCR). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted to examine key correlates of profile membership. Five latent profiles were identified (1) Low PDS/NCR (22.2%), (2) Low PDS/Elevated NCR (14.8%), (3) Moderate PDS/NCR (18.7%), (4) Elevated PDS/NCR (33.5%), and (5) Highest PDS/NCR (10.8%). Compared with Profile 1 (Low PDS/NCR), parents in Profiles 2–5 generally reported lower family intimacy (RRR = 0.93–0.97). Parents in Profile 5 (Highest PDS/NCR) reported more family conflict (RRR = 1.13), hazardous alcohol use (RRR = 1.20), depressive symptoms (RRR = 1.31), and anxiety symptoms (RRR = 1.29), with markedly elevated depressive (RRR = 22.94) and anxiety symptomatology (RRR = 17.48) compared with Profile 1. Our findings suggest the presence of vulnerable subgroups due to cultural stress among Latin American parents in the United States. A better understanding of cultural stress patterns may improve current and future interventions tailored for Latin American families, addressing health disparities within this population.Climate change has serious consequences for the morbidity and mortality of older adults.
To identify the effects of climate change on older people's health.
A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Quantitative research and reports from organizations describing the effects of climate change on older people were selected.
Sixty-three full-text documents were selected. Heat and air pollution were the two factors that had the most negative effects on cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality in older people. Mental health and cognitive function were also affected.
Climate change affects several health problems in older individuals, especially high temperatures and air pollution. Nursing professionals must have the necessary skills to respond to the climate risks in older adults. More instruments are required to determine nursing competencies on climate change and the health of this population group.
No patient or public contribution.
Depressive symptoms are common in the growing geriatric surgical population and are associated with important patient-centred surgical outcomes, including postoperative delirium, discharge to postacute care facility and decline in functional status. Few interventions have been developed to address depressive symptoms in the perioperative setting.
We designed a feasibility and acceptability study of a nine-session problem-solving therapy (PST) telehealth perioperative intervention aimed at reducing postoperative functional decline and depressive symptoms among at-risk older adults undergoing major surgical procedures. Acceptability will be evaluated using a patient-centred five-question survey, assessing participant satisfaction and perceived usefulness of the perioperative intervention. A feasibility assessment will rely on objective measures including ease of participant recruitment, frequency and timing of delivery of intervention sessions and retention of participants throughout the duration of the intervention. With respect to the efficacy of the proposed PST intervention, the primary outcome of interest is postoperative functional status, as measured by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 at the 6-month postoperative time point. The secondary outcome of interest is the degree of depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at both 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The broader goals of this study include: (1) assessing the feasibility of implementing a PST perioperative intervention for older surgical patients at risk of postoperative functional decline, (2) demonstrating the acceptability of the PST intervention and (3) assessing the preliminary impact of the PST intervention on postoperative functional status and depressive symptoms.
The study received ethical approval from the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board. Results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals with further dissemination at local institutional meetings and professional conferences.
To determine common and distinct factors experienced by nurses working in acute care settings during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
An online qualitative descriptive study with eight open-ended questions and a comprehensive demographic profile administered via the Qualtrics XM survey software.
Thirteen countries formed teams and led online data collection in their respective countries through various approaches. The data collection period occurred between January 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022. Descriptive thematic analysis was conducted in English (with translation), Spanish, and Korean to analyse the qualitative data. Descriptive statistics summarised the responses to the demographic profile.
Worldwide, a final sample size of n = 1814 produced 6483 qualitative data points for analysis. The results identified ongoing occupational risk factors for nurses during the pandemic's second year, including mental health issues, yet showed some improvements in access to personal protective equipment and resources. Four themes emerged from the qualitative analysis, highlighting role changes, living states, and insights into the implementation of pandemic response measures.
Despite individual occupational risks nurses described, structural factors associated with healthcare delivery produced common nursing experiences during the pandemic. Additionally, at least two distinct stages of pandemic response implementation were demarcated by treatment availability (e.g., vaccine development).
There is potential for common pandemic response policies for nurses, centered on specific factors, such as the increased provision of mental health support services by healthcare organisations.
This study helped determine the common and distinct work experiences during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses simultaneously experienced increased workload, role changes, perpetual fear and fatigue, daily hostility, and chaos in the implementation of pandemic responses. The results will impact nurses and those they serve along with future pandemic response policies.
We have adhered to the SRQR reporting guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Patients with fragility fractures are two times as likely to suffer future fractures as their peers who have not suffered a fracture. In addition, 40% of those who suffer fragility fractures do not recover their level of functioning in terms of activities of daily living after 1 year. The present study aims to verify the hypothesis that a semipersonalised home-based exercise intervention may improve patients’ independence and reduce the number of hospital admissions compared with usual care for a population that suffers fragility fractures.
This parallel-arm single-blinded randomised-controlled trial will take place at the University of Cordoba (Spain) between September 2022 and September 2024. Patients aged >50 years old who have undergone surgery for a fragility hip fracture and who were prefracture independent (Barthel index (BI)>60) will be invited to participate. Patients will be excluded if they present a different type of fracture, mild or greater cognitive impairment or contraindication to exercise training. Patients will then be randomised into exercise or usual care group. The former will receive a daily walking appointment (number of steps to be completed inside home, interspersed with sit-to-stand movements) with the total volume increasing weekly. The latter will receive the usual care. The outcomes, collected at baseline, at the end of training (3 months) and at follow-up (6 months) by blinded operators will include the BI and number of readmissions (primary outcomes) and quality of life, exercise capacity, strength, cognitive status, bone mineral density and laboratory biomarkers (secondary outcomes). Variables related to quality of life, cognitive status, laboratory markers and densitometry will also be analysed.
The research ethics committee of the province of Cordoba approved the project (number 326; date 28 July 2021). Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will receive a patient information document and the consent form and will be encouraged to ask any questions. The proposed research respects the fundamental principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Council of Europe Declaration on Human Rights and Biomedicine, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, and the Oviedo Council on Human Rights and Biomedicine. The data obtained in this study will be confidential. They will be treated by the Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights, keeping it strictly confidential and not accessible to unauthorised third parties, and the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on Data Protection (RGPD). Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants. The study’s results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific congresses worldwide. The results will also be disseminated through patient advocacy group newsletters and social media platforms. Patient partners will help select the appropriate channels and develop plain-language summaries tailored to their communities’ needs.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04934358 (registration date: 14 June 2021).
This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing haemodialysis, focusing on the association between HRQoL dimensions and sociodemographic variables, clinical parameters, mental health status and biochemical indicators.
A multicentre cross-sectional study conducted over 30 months.
The study was carried out in secondary care centres across multiple locations in the Community of Extremadura, Spain.
A total of 150 patients undergoing haemodialysis were recruited between March 2022 and September 2023. Inclusion criteria required patients to be diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and undergoing haemodialysis. Patients unable to provide informed consent or with severe cognitive impairment were excluded.
HRQoL was assessed using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-item Short Form scale. Mental health parameters, specifically anxiety and depression, were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Biochemical markers such as haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, as well as sociodemographic and clinical data, were analysed for their influence on HRQoL.
Symptoms of anxiety and depression were prevalent among patients undergoing haemodialysis. Anxiety had the greatest negative effect on HRQoL, being significantly associated with lower scores in the mental component summary (MCS) (β = –2.06; 95% CI –2.78 to –1.33; R² = 0.106; p
Depression and anxiety, along with older age, were identified as key factors negatively affecting HRQoL of patients undergoing haemodialysis. Management of mental health, alongside optimisation of clinical care to minimise complications, could enhance the HRQoL in this patient population. Further research is recommended to develop targeted interventions addressing anxiety and other modifiable factors influencing HRQoL in haemodialysis patients.
FreshRSS 