FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer support after miscarriage: a systematic review using thematic synthesis methods

Por: Burton · L. · Charles · J. · Cherry · M. G. · Corcoran · R. · Hassan · S. · Hill · R. · Little · S. · Maden · M. · Mulholland · H. · Perkins · E. · Slade · P. · Wallis · S. · Marshall · P.
Objectives

Miscarriage, defined in the UK as loss of pregnancy prior to 24 weeks gestation, can have long-term psychological implications. Clinical guidelines for perinatal bereavement care do not provide guidance on how best to support the mental health of women, and their partners, after miscarriage. Peer support (support from those who share common characteristics) is often sought, but there is little understanding of its access and use. We conducted a systematic review to understand the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of peer support to improve mental health outcomes for parents after miscarriage.

Design

Systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Data sources

A comprehensive systematic search across nine databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science (all databases), EMBASE, CENTRAL, LENS.org, British Nursing Index and Health Management Information Consortium) was conducted in June 2025. Grey literature was identified through website searching, contact with topic experts and a national Call for Evidence.

Eligibility criteria

Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring motivations, experiences and preferences for peer support after miscarriage were included.

Data extraction and synthesis

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen, extract and code included studies. Suitable studies were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist. Findings were extracted and subjected to a thematic synthesis.

Results

Across nine studies included in the review, three overarching themes were developed, with seven subthemes, capturing both barriers and facilitators. ‘Engaging in relational recognition’ reflects the validation and connection that arise through experiential resonance, often heightened by the context of exclusion from broader social or clinical support. ‘Mechanisms of Communality’ describe how communality is enacted through dynamic peer interactions, including modelling and facilitating grief, benchmarking physical change and mattering through reciprocity, highlighting mutual support and shared coping. ‘Dynamics of Access’ consider factors which shape engagement, including changing needs of individuals across time and modalities of support and their effects.

Conclusions

These findings form the first synthesis of peer support after miscarriage and bring a nuanced service user perspective of barriers and facilitators by examining evidence from diverse studies. Peer support after miscarriage was seen to be a dynamic, relational process shaped by shared experience, mutual exchange and context-specific factors. Findings underscore key policy and practice considerations, including the use of trauma-informed, loss-sensitive approaches and consideration of intersectionality, that should be reflected when offering peer support services, with and for, those who have experienced miscarriage.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024518248.

Glycemia Range and Offspring Weight and adiposity in response To Human milk (GROWTH) study: protocol for an observational cohort designed to study lactational programming

Por: Josefson · J. L. · Gregg · B. · Sen · S. · Rajakumar · K. · McGowan · E. C. · Andrei · A.-C. · Arend · A. B. · Rick · A.-M. · Marshall · E. · Caal · K. · Robinson · D. T.
Introduction

Maternal human milk feedings continue an offspring’s exposure to the programming stimuli of maternal metabolism during the postnatal period. While considerable research focuses on associations between in utero environments and offspring metabolic disease, few studies have been able to specifically measure how human milk composition modifies programming of children’s growth in conjunction with comprehensive measures of maternal glycaemia during pregnancy.

Methods and analysis

The Glycemia Range and Offspring Weight and adiposity in response To Human milk (GROWTH) Study is a longitudinal cohort enrolling women with a singleton pregnancy who (1) undergo serial testing of glycaemia during pregnancy and (2) are intending to provide their breast milk through direct breastfeeding or pumped milk as the primary nutrition for their infant. Enrolment started in October 2023 and is expected to be completed in December 2026. Key procedures include virtual lactation support visits, serial human milk sampling at three time points, maternal and infant blood sampling, serial maternal and child anthropometric measurements and diet assessment. After delivery, mother–child dyads are followed until children turn 2 years of age. The primary exposure variable is maternal glycaemia obtained from a fasting, 3 hour 100 g oral glucose tolerance test performed at 24–28 weeks of gestation, and the primary outcome measure is the composite of human milk linoleic and docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in milk samples collected at 1 month postpartum.

Ethics and dissemination

Lurie Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) provides central oversight of the GROWTH Study in conjunction with each participating centre’s IRB. The GROWTH Study data has the potential to inform perinatal health and future research in lactation and human milk science by providing comprehensive measures of human milk composition and early childhood growth and body composition parameters impacted by maternal metabolism in pregnancy.

LEAN mass Preservation with Resistance Exercise and Protein during semaglutide and tirzepatide therapy (LEAN-PREP study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Por: Alawadhi · A. A. · Alroudhan · D. · Alsaeed · D. J. · Almarshad · B. W. · Alshehabi · D. H. · Allahou · B. A. · Mashankar · A. · Al Ozairi · E. · Gray · S.
Introduction

Obesity is a global public health issue, with its effects a particular issue in Kuwait. Advances in pharmaceutical treatment (eg, glucagon-like peptide-1s) offer an effective solution, with the magnitude of weight lost something to celebrate. However, this level of weight loss also results in dramatic reductions in lean mass, reflecting loss of muscle mass and muscle strength which can predispose people to sarcopenia. This is a particular issue in people with type 2 diabetes in Kuwait, where the prevalence of muscle weakness is extremely high. Solutions to mitigate this loss of muscle mass and strength are needed, with a pragmatic resistance exercise intervention and increasing dietary protein intake having potential. This trial aims to determine whether resistance exercise and/or protein intake can preserve muscle mass and improve physical function in people with obesity initiating semaglutide/tirzepatide therapy.

Methods and analysis

This single-centre, 6-month, randomised controlled trial at Dasman Diabetes Institute will enrol 232 adults with obesity, randomised (1:1:1:1) to control, resistance exercise, protein supplementation or combined resistance exercise and protein in conjunction with semaglutide or tirzepatide therapy. Resistance exercise will be home-based and involve three sessions per week, progressing from one to three sets targeting major muscle groups. Protein supplementation will target 1.6 g/kg/day via dietary adjustment and protein products. Assessments at baseline and 6 months will include MRI measured quadriceps cross-sectional area (primary outcome), plus measures of secondary outcomes of MRI measured liver fat content and stiffness and intramuscular fat, body composition (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), strength, physical function, dietary assessment, physical activity levels, sleep patterns, quality of life, glycaemic control and metabolic biomarkers.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has received ethical approval from the Dasman Diabetes Institute Ethical Review Committee (HR-RA-2025-01, 19 February 2025) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06885736, 26 June 2025). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants, with no financial compensation provided. Data will be reported in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, ensuring participant anonymity. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number

NCT06885736.

Advanced Technology for Detection of Wound Infection

ABSTRACT

Early detection of infection in superficial skin wounds remains a critical determinant of healing outcomes, particularly in paediatric populations, where developmental and behavioural factors often limit clinical assessment. Traditional diagnostic approaches, including visual inspection and culture-based microbiology, are constrained by subjectivity and diagnostic delay. Over the past decade, several innovative technologies have emerged that enable earlier, more objective identification of pathogenic activity in wounds. This focused mini-review summarizes recent advances in novel imaging, biosensor-enabled smart dressings, and molecular diagnostics, with an emphasis on the mechanisms, clinical evidence, and applicability to superficial wound care. Collectively, these technologies represent a shift toward precision wound diagnostics that may facilitate earlier intervention, reduce unnecessary antimicrobial exposure, and improve healing outcomes.

Clinical Trials in Central Venous Access Devices: An Evidence and Gap Map

ABSTRACT

Aims

To systematically map the landscape of central venous access device research from 2014 to 2024, identifying critical gaps in evidence that may impact nursing practice and patient outcomes across the full device lifecycle from selection through to removal.

Design

This review was conducted in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

Data Sources

PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched with additional hand-searching of reference lists from included reviews.

Methods

We systematically reviewed literature published between 2014 and 2024, mapping 710 studies on central venous access device interventions and outcomes. Studies were categorised by design, population, setting, device characteristics, intervention types, and outcomes. Evidence was evaluated using the National Health and Medical Research Council levels of evidence framework.

Results

Of 710 included studies, 89 were systematic reviews and 621 primary studies, of which 41.1% (n = 292) were randomised controlled trials. Research was primarily conducted in high-income countries (n = 405, 65.2%) and focused on adults (n = 370, 59.6%) in hospital inpatient settings (n = 588, 94.7%). Catheter insertion and infection prevention dominated the evidence base, while device selection and removal procedures were less studied. Infection outcomes were extensively reported (bloodstream infection: n = 455, 13.6% of 3349 outcomes), while patient-reported outcomes (n = 218, 6.5%) and cost (n = 60, 1.8%) were underrepresented.

Conclusions

This review reveals that central venous access device research is predominantly focused on insertion and infection prevention while other key parts of nursing practice are under-supported.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Future nursing research should address these gaps to improve evidence-based care across diverse populations and healthcare contexts, particularly focusing on understudied device types, settings, and vulnerable populations.

Reporting Method

This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Longitudinal Mediating Role of Cancer‐Coping Self‐Efficacy Between Symptom Occurrence and Quality of Life Among Cancer Patients: A Cross‐Lagged Panel Model

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Although the positive correlation between self-efficacy and quality of life and the negative correlation between symptom occurrence and self-efficacy are well established in the cancer literature, the underlying mechanism, whether self-efficacy mediates the effect of symptoms on quality of life, remains unclear due to the cross-sectional design of prior studies. Longitudinal investigation is crucial for establishing the causal mechanism of self-efficacy in mitigating the adverse impact of cancer-related symptoms on quality of life.

Aim

To examine the longitudinal mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life among 534 cancer patients on treatment with moderate to high symptoms.

Methods

This is a secondary data analysis of the longitudinal mediating effect. A sample of patients with moderate to high symptoms on cancer treatments (N = 534) from a randomised controlled trial was used. We adopted a cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) approach to test the longitudinal mediating effect with three waves. The longitudinal invariance of the measurement was previously tested.

Results

The results showed that cancer-coping self-efficacy predicted the following assessment of symptom occurrence, but not vice versa. Also, cancer-coping self-efficacy had an immediate direct impact on quality of life and the influence sustained to the following assessment. Our mediating analysis showed that cancer-coping self-efficacy totally mediated the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life (unstandardized β = −0.008, standardised B = −0.036, p = 0.036, CI95 = [−0.001, −0.016]).

Conclusion

Our findings provide initial evidence supporting the causal mechanism of cancer-coping self-efficacy in interventions that aim for symptom management and quality of life improvement.

Implications

This study is the first to test the longitudinal mediating mechanism of cancer-coping self-efficacy in the relationship between symptom occurrence and quality of life among the cancer population. Further testing using a randomised controlled trial of a specifically designed self-efficacy-enhancing intervention is needed.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Time to use hospital passports: their use to improve the health outcomes of people with intellectual disabilities

Por: Marsh · L. · Brown · M.

Commentary on: Jackson, J. Sinyor, J. & Trower, H. Umbrella review of hospital passports: Their use and improvements. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2024;1–9.

Implications for practice and research

  • Strategic management support for hospital passports use can improve the health outcomes of hospitalised patients with intellectual disabilities and have a wider reach for any hospitalised patient with additional support needs.

  • Future research should commit to equitable care that is accessible and person centred to ensure improved health outcomes.

  • Context

    People with intellectual disabilities are at a significantly greater risk of experiencing preventable, avoidable and premature death compared with the general population.1 As a population, they have high health needs and are frequent consumers of all health services. Hospital or health passports are documents retained and completed by the patient, detailing essential past and current health information and communication preferences.2...

    Organ failure type in fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis: a systematic review

    Por: McKenzie · B. · Marshall · S. D. · Sanci · L. · Poonian · J. · Nair · R. · J Selman · C. · Douglass · J. A.
    Objectives

    Anaphylaxis is a sudden onset multiorgan allergic reaction that infrequently but regularly causes fatalities which may be preventable with appropriate organ support. There is limited data about the type of organ failure leading to death or near-fatal episodes resulting in permanent neurological disability. To assist clinicians facing anaphylaxis in diverse clinical settings, we aimed to quantify the frequency of organ failure type contributing to death or neurological disability from anaphylaxis according to allergen trigger.

    Design

    Systematic review of published peer-reviewed literature.

    Data sources

    Three databases were searched to January 2025: MEDLINE from 1946, Embase from 1947 and Web of Science from 1900.

    Eligibility criteria

    Studies were eligible if they contained data about the type of clinical deterioration during anaphylaxis resulting in death or permanent neurological disability. No language restriction was implemented. Exclusion criteria were: hydatid anaphylaxis; five or more stings from an insect; death from acute atheromatous myocardial infarction and where anaphylaxis was only a differential diagnosis.

    Data extraction and synthesis

    We extracted information using pre-specified criteria to determine the primary organ failure involved: either upper airway obstruction, lower respiratory obstruction (bronchospasm) or cardiovascular failure. Baseline demographics including age and asthma status were collected along with the allergen trigger, time course and treatment. We reported frequencies according to allergen trigger for case reports and a narrative analysis of case series weighted by risk of bias assessment.

    Results

    277 case studies and 14 case series were identified reporting 896 deaths and 28 disabilities. There were no other study types. Separate case series and case report analyses produced similar findings despite varying quality of published clinical data. Respiratory failure was the most common primary organ failure in case reports (73.4%), whereas primary cardiovascular failure was reported in 26.6% of case reports. Primary organ failure type differed in frequency by allergen trigger and was primarily caused by: respiratory failure when food was the allergen trigger (95%); respiratory failure in 65% of cases of drug allergen triggers; cardiovascular failure in 65% venom allergen triggers.

    Conclusion

    In this review, respiratory failure (primarily bronchospasm) is the most common primary physiological event leading to decompensation in fatal anaphylaxis, particularly for food and drug allergen deaths. Emphasising the significance of respiratory involvement, particularly from bronchospasm, in both patient and clinician facing anaphylaxis treatment guidelines may help further reduce the risk of fatalities. Prospective anaphylaxis management registries or whole population data are needed to better capture primary organ failure present in fatal anaphylaxis to validate this finding.

    PROSPERO registration number

    CRD42023434206.

    A cultural lens on decision-making in treatment decisions about inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative analysis with South Asian patients, caregivers and clinicians in Canada

    Por: Suryaprakash · N. · Ruzycki · S. M. · Raman · M. · Singh · S. · Nasser · Y. · Rai · P. P. K. · Sidhu · K. · Sidhu · S. · Marshall · D. A.
    Objective

    There are limited data about how South Asian (SA) patients, their caregivers and their physicians make decisions about treatment, in particular advanced therapies. The study aimed to explore how SA people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their family members and clinicians experience and perceive treatment-related decision-making with the aim of identifying strategies to improve treatment decision-making in Canada.

    Design

    A descriptive qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews.

    Setting

    Canada.

    Participants

    Adults residing in Canada, who self-identified as SA, had received treatment or cared for someone who received treatment for IBD from a gastroenterologist in Canada, and who spoke and understood English, Hindi and/or Punjabi were eligible to participate in the study. Clinician participants (eg, nurses, gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons) were eligible if they had experience treating SA patients with IBD.

    Interventions

    Data from 1:1, semi-structured interviews were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

    Results

    The length of time spent in Canada played a central role in patient perspectives on decision-making around IBD treatment. First or second-generation SA people, residency status, family and community involvement, universal factors like stigma, medication costs and preferences for non-pharmacological treatments influenced decision-making. Patient and caregiver participants reported high satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making processes, while clinician participants self-reported lesser satisfaction.

    Conclusions

    Clinicians and researchers working with SA patients in chronic disease specialties can use these findings to meet the healthcare needs and reduce disparities in optimal treatment for this patient population.

    Trial registration

    N/A.

    A novel approach for longitudinal analysis of serum biomarkers of joint metabolism and knee injury in military officers

    by Liubov Arbeeva, Virginia B. Kraus, Amanda E. Nelson, Maryalice Nocera, Leigh F. Callahan, Richard F. Loeser, Kenneth L. Cameron, Jesse R. Trump, Stephen W. Marshall, Yvonne M. Golightly

    Purpose

    To investigate the longitudinal relationships between serum biomarkers of joint metabolism, knee injury, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) using novel methodologies.

    Methods

    Data were collected from military officers who enrolled as cadets between 2004–2009, with follow-up conducted between 2015–2017. Analyses included 234 officers who had no history of knee ligament/meniscal injury at the time of military academy matriculation, had serum biomarker measurements at matriculation and graduation, demographic data, and KOOS assessment at follow-up. Biomarkers included Collagen Type II (C2C) and Type I and II (C1,2C) collagenase-generated cleavage epitopes, C-terminal propeptide of Type II collagen (CPII), and C- and N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX and NTX). Angle-based Joint and Individual Variation Explained (AJIVE) was used to determine demographic determinants of biomarker levels and individual modes of variation specific to biomarker levels at matriculation and graduation, stratified by sex.

    Results

    We confirmed known associations of joint metabolism biomarkers with age in both sexes and with smoking in males. Matriculation biomarker data in males suggested a protective biomarker profile characterized by high cartilage synthesis and low cleavage of type I and II collagen in association with healthy KOOS scores at follow-up. CPII measured at matriculation was negatively associated with incident injuries after adjustment for smoking status (p = 0.03, logistic regression), confirming results from AJIVE.

    Conclusion

    These exploratory analyses suggest that CPII alone, or in combination with other joint metabolism biomarkers, may help identify individual risk of knee injury.

    Factor Structure and Longitudinal Invariance of the Cancer Behaviour Inventory: Assessing Cancer‐Coping Self‐Efficacy in Patients With Moderate‐to‐High Symptoms

    ABSTRACT

    Background

    The Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version was designed to assess cancer-coping self-efficacy in clinical and research settings where minimising patient burden is essential. However, there is no evidence of its longitudinal validity. Although widely used in cancer research, the lack of evidence for longitudinal invariance significantly undermines its validity in studies spanning multiple time points. Establishing longitudinal invariance enables valid comparisons over time, enhancing our confidence in applying it in longitudinal research.

    Aim

    To examine the factor structure of the measurement and test its longitudinal invariance across four time points in cancer patients experiencing moderate-to-high symptoms during curative cancer treatment.

    Design

    A longitudinal psychometric evaluation.

    Methods

    This is a secondary data analysis of a randomised controlled trial in patients with moderate-to-high symptoms undergoing cancer treatment (N = 534). We conducted longitudinal invariance tests for the measurement using four time points. Other psychometric tests included confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analyses and correlations.

    Results

    Our confirmatory factor analysis supported the four-factor, 12-item structure for the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version. Items 1 and 6 were found to be moderately correlated. The resulting 12-item measure demonstrated good internal consistency, with convergent and divergent validity supported by correlations with selected instruments. Finally, longitudinal invariance was tested, which revealed strict measurement invariance across four time points (CFI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.045, SRMA = 0.056).

    Conclusion

    We found that the factor structure of the Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version remained stable over four time points in a sample of patients having moderate to high symptoms under cancer treatment. This supports its accountability for examining the changes in cancer-coping self-efficacy among cancer patients over time in longitudinal studies.

    Implications

    This study confirms that Cancer Behaviour Inventory–Brief Version has adequate internal consistency and demonstrated evidence of construct validity. Our conclusion of strict longitudinal invariance supports its credibility for continuous assessment of cancer-coping self-efficacy to evaluate patient outcomes and intervention processes over time in clinical and research settings.

    Patient or Public Contribution

    No patient or public contribution.

    Palliative care consultation for end-of-life decision-making in hospitalised patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Por: Haddad · G. · Ajzenberg · H. · Davis · F. D. · Fogelman · P. A. · Korzick · K. · Marshall · M. F. · Naylor · D. · Swoboda · S. M. · Reid · J. · Oczkowski · S.
    Introduction

    Hospitalised patients nearing the end of life (EOL) often face complex treatment decisions, leading to potential conflicts among care teams, patients and families. Palliative care consultations may enhance decision-making processes, improve satisfaction and reduce unnecessary interventions. This systematic review will assess the impact of palliative care consultations on treatment decisions, family and patient satisfaction, and psychological outcomes in hospitalised adults.

    Methods and analysis

    We will include randomised controlled trials comparing palliative care consultations to standard care in hospitalised adults. The primary outcomes will include decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments, patient and family satisfaction with EOL decision-making, and psychological outcomes such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Secondary outcomes will include intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, utilisation of potentially non-beneficial treatments, and the use of institutional policies or legal actions. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO will be systematically searched from inception to September 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data using Covidence. Meta-analyses will use random-effects models to generate pooled estimates for primary and secondary outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evidence certainty will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Subgroup analyses will explore variations by ICU versus non-ICU settings, cancer versus non-cancer diagnoses and default versus clinician-initiated consultations.

    Ethics and dissemination

    Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

    PROSPERO registration number

    CRD420250624190.

    Time to implement the strategies that work to address the health inequalities experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities

    Por: Brown · M. · Marsh · L.

    Commentary on: Heslop, P., Lauer, E. (2024). Strategies to prevent or reduce inequalities in specific avoidable causes of death for adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), pp.312-349.

    Implications for practice and research

  • Preventative interventions and reasonable adjustments are required to address health inequalities experienced by adults with intellectual disability.

  • Future research should focus on policy, population and individual interventions that reduce health inequalities and avoidable deaths.

  • Context

    There is well-established research evidence regarding the substantial health inequalities experienced by many adults with intellectual disabilities, with significant implications for their health, well-being and quality of life. Despite this evidence, many continue to die prematurely from conditions amenable to early interventions and preventative strategies. Limited knowledge, skills and confidence regarding the needs of adults with intellectual disabilities by some health professionals is evident. Reasonable adjustments can contribute positively...

    Is there a role for anticoagulation with dabigatran in S. aureus bacteremia? Protocol for the adjunctive treatment domain of the Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) randomised controlled trial

    Por: McDonald · E. G. · Cheng · M. P. · Davis · J. S. · Goodman · A. L. · Lawler · P. R. · Marsh · J. · Mertz · D. · Paul · M. · Rodriguez-Bano · J. · Siegal · D. M. · Tong · S. Y. · Walls · G. · Lee · T. C. · The SNAP Global Trial Steering Committee · Bonten · Daneman · van Hal · Heriot
    Introduction

    Many patients receive oral anticoagulation for reduced stroke risk in atrial fibrillation or as treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism. Oral factor Xa inhibitors (oral FXaI, eg, apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban) are commonly prescribed for this indication. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is similarly approved. In vitro and animal model evidence suggests that dabigatran also has direct effects on Staphylococcus aureus virulence and infection. Observational data have shown that dabigatran users are less likely to develop S. aureus bacteremia (SAB), and a small randomised controlled trial showed that dabigatran has anti-S. aureus effects when compared with low molecular weight heparins during bloodstream infection. We seek to answer whether dabigatran is superior to the oral FXaIs in achieving better SAB outcomes among patients who independently require oral anticoagulation. We report the intervention-specific protocol, embedded in an adaptive platform trial.

    Methods and analysis

    The S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial [NCT05137119] is a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre adaptive platform trial that compares different SAB therapies for 90-day mortality rates. For this intervention (‘Dabi-SNAP’), patients receiving therapy with an oral FXaI will be randomised to continue as usual or to change to dabigatran as of the next scheduled dose. All subjects will receive standard of care antibiotics and/or antibiotics allocated through other active domains in the platform. As the choice of anticoagulant may not demonstrate large differences in mortality, a ranked composite of death and adverse outcomes (Desirability of Outcome Ranking, or DOOR) was chosen as the primary outcome.

    Ethics and dissemination

    The study is conditionally approved by the research ethics board of the McGill University Health Centre: identifier 2025-10900. Trial results will be published open access in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a global infectious disease conference. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT06650501.

    Trial registration number

    NCT0665050.

    Percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality from acute myocardial infarction in EU15+ countries, 2006-2020: a secondary analysis of the OECD database

    Por: Ojha · U. · Marshall · D. C. · Hammond-Haley · M. · Salciccioli · J. D. · Shalhoub · J. · Hartley · A.
    Objective

    Coronary revascularisation practices have evolved over the last three decades. This study sought to examine the variations in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) rates, alongside mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across a group of 16 high-income countries between 2006 and 2020.

    Design

    Retrospective observational analysis using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database between 2006 and 2020. Estimated annual percent change in revascularisation was analysed using Joinpoint regression model, and mortality rates were evaluated using the locally weighted scatterplot smoothing model.

    Setting

    Publicly available data on PCI and CABG procedure rates alongside AMI mortality rate from 2006 to 2020.

    Participants

    16 countries from the OECD database.

    Interventions

    Not applicable.

    Main outcome measures

    Standardised PCI and CABG procedure rates and AMI age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) from 2006 to 2020.

    Results

    Over the 15 year period, 14.0 million PCI and 2.8 million CABG procedures were collectively recorded across 16 countries. PCI rates varied among nations, but from 2006 to 2020 increased in 11 of the 16 nations overall, led by Finland (+36.0%), Ireland (+34.5%) and France (+31.5%). Meanwhile, CABG rates declined in 14 out of the 16 countries, with Luxembourg (–71.3%), the UK (–62.6%) and Finland (–60.6%) experiencing the most substantial decreases. Throughout the study period, the PCI-to-CABG ratio increased, while AMI ASMR decreased consistently across all countries.

    Conclusions

    Despite evidence supporting CABG over PCI in specific scenarios, CABG rates have declined, and PCI rates have increased. Possible factors for this trend may include patient preference and advancement in interventional techniques. The varied use of PCI among these nations, alongside a sustained decline in AMI mortality rates, may be expected given the importance of optimal medical therapy in the management of ischaemic heart disease. The results further suggest the significance of factors beyond revascularisation in driving improved outcomes.

    Psychometric Evaluations of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Version 2.0 in Ethiopia (E-HSoPSC 2.0): A Cross-Sectional Study

    Por: Fekadu · G. · Marshall · A. P. · Muir · R. · Tobiano · G. · Ireland · M. J.
    Objectives

    To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSoPSC) version 2.0 in Ethiopian public hospitals.

    Design

    A cross-sectional study.

    Settings

    Five public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.

    Participants

    Healthcare professionals (N=582).

    Main outcome measure

    An adapted and contextualised version of HSoPSC 2.0 was used to conduct structural validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA). Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated through item loadings and interfactor correlations, respectively. Reliability was measured using McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha.

    Results

    CFA indicated a poor model fit for the original 10-factor, 32-item HSoPSC 2.0 across all statistical indices: relative chi-square (²/df=7.71), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA=0.108), standardised root mean square residual (SRMR=0.088), comparative fit index (CFI=0.814) and Tucker-Lewis’s index (TLI=0.780). Consequently, a comprehensive EFA was conducted, which identified a revised model comprising 5-factor, 21-item. This model accounted for 62.8% of the total variance and demonstrated strong construct validity, with excellent fit indices (²/df=3.67, RMSEA=0.068, SRMR=0.034, CFI=0.969, TLI=0.945). Internal consistency, assessed via McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha, exceeded the acceptable threshold of 0.70 across all dimensions, except for Response to Error (0.66). The convergent and discriminant validity of the new model was confirmed, ensuring an accurate representation of the underlying constructs.

    Conclusions

    The original HSoPSC 2.0 with 10-factor, 32-item failed to demonstrate structural validity in the Ethiopian healthcare context. In contrast, a revised 5-factor, 21-item model showed strong validity and acceptable reliability. This adapted version provides a culturally and contextually relevant tool for assessing patient safety culture in Ethiopian healthcare settings.

    Perceptions of an AI-based clinical decision support tool for prescribing in multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative study of general practice clinicians in England

    Por: dElia · A. · Morris · S. G. · Cooper · J. · Nirantharakumar · K. · Jackson · T. · Marshall · T. · Fitzsimmons · L. · Jackson · L. J. · Crowe · F. · Haroon · S. · Greenfield · S. · Hathaway · E.
    Background

    Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are currently being developed to aid prescribing in primary care. There is a lack of research on how these systems will be perceived and used by healthcare professionals and subsequently on how to optimise the implementation process of AI-based CDSSs (AICDSSs).

    Objectives

    To explore healthcare professionals’ perspectives on the use of an AICDSS for prescribing in co-existing multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), and the relevance to shared decision making (SDM).

    Design

    Qualitative study using template analysis of semistructured interviews, based on a case vignette and a mock-up of an AICDSS.

    Setting

    Healthcare professionals prescribing for patients working in the English National Health Service (NHS) primary care in the West Midlands region.

    Participants

    A purposive sample of general practitioners/resident doctors (10), nurse prescribers (3) and prescribing pharmacists (2) working in the English NHS primary care.

    Results

    The proposed tool generated interest among the participants. Findings included the perception of the tool as user friendly and as a valuable complement to existing clinical guidelines, particularly in a patient population with multiple long-term conditions and polypharmacy, where existing guidelines may be inadequate. Concerns were raised about integration into existing clinical documentation systems, medicolegal aspects, how to interpret findings that were inconsistent with clinical guidelines, and the impact on patient-prescriber relationships. Views differed on whether the tool would aid SDM.

    Conclusion

    AICDSSs such as the OPTIMAL tool hold potential for optimising pharmaceutical treatment in patients with MLTC. However, specific issues related to the tool need to be addressed and careful implementation into the existing clinical practice is necessary to realise the potential benefits.

    Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical and Independent Prescriber (PHOENIx) intervention for people facing severe and multiple disadvantages

    Por: Lowrie · R. · McPherson · A. · Moir · J. · McGilvery · E. · Vickery · K. · OLoan · J. · Rushworth · G. · Paudyal · V. · Adam · A. · Thomson · E. · Rowe · A. · Ali Akbar · H. · Murphy · J. · Budd · J. · Raeburn · F. · Marshall · T. · Nelson · K. · Garstka · Z. · McKinney · E. · Melville · L.
    Introduction

    People experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD: homelessness, substance use and criminal offending) have multiple intersecting unmet health and social care needs and high mortality rates, often due to street-drug overdose. Pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs) suggest an integrated, holistic, collaborative outreach intervention (Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent Prescribing Rx (PHOENIx)) involving generalist-trained pharmacists, nurses or General Practitioners accompanied by staff from third sector homeless organisations may improve outcomes, including reducing overdose.

    Methods

    Multicentre, parallel group, prospective RCT with parallel economic and process evaluation. Set in six areas of Scotland, UK, 378 adults with SMD will be recruited and randomised (stratified by setting and previous non-fatal overdoses) to PHOENIx intervention in addition to usual care (UC) or UC. Aiming to meet participants weekly for 9–15 months, PHOENIx teams assess and address health and social care needs while referring onwards as necessary, co-ordinating care with wider health and third sector teams. During a person-centred consultation, in the participants’ choice of venue, and taking account of the participant’s priorities, the NHS clinician may prescribe, de-prescribe and treat, for example, wound care, and refer to other health services as necessary. The third sector worker may help with welfare benefit applications, social prescribing or advocacy, for example, securing stable housing. Pairings of clinicians and third sector workers support the same participants. The primary outcome is time to first fatal/non-fatal street-drug overdose at nine months. Secondary endpoints include health-related quality of life, healthcare use and criminal justice encounters. A health economic evaluation will assess cost per quality adjusted life year of PHOENIx relative to standard care. A parallel qualitative process evaluation will explore the perceptions and experiences of PHOENIx, by participants, stakeholders and PHOENIx staff.

    Analysis

    The primary and other time-to-event secondary outcomes will be analysed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

    Ethics and dissemination

    IRAS number 345246, approved 23/10/2024 by North of Scotland Research Ethics Service. Results will be shared with participants, third sector homelessness organisations, health and social care partnerships, then peer-reviewed journals and conferences worldwide, from the first quarter of 2027.

    Trial registration number

    ISRCTN12234059 registered on 20/2/2025 (ISRCTN).

    Predictors of shared decision-making among treatment-seeking emerging adults in primary care and community addiction and mental health settings: A cross-sectional study

    by Tyler Marshall, Karin Olson, Adam Abba-Aji, Xin-Min Li, Richard Lewanczuk, Sunita Vohra

    Background

    Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients make health-related decisions collaboratively, guided by the best available evidence. Previous research suggests that emerging adults (aged 18–29) with mental health concerns might prefer SDM over traditional approaches; however, it remains unclear whether prevalent symptoms of anxiety, depression, or health-related quality of life (HRQL) are associated with the level of SDM that occurs during a clinical encounter.

    Objective

    This study explored whether prevalent symptoms of anxiety, depression or HRQL among emerging adults were associated with the perceived level of SDM involvement during a single clinic visit at a primary care or community addiction and mental health (AMH) setting.

    Methods

    A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a subset of data (emerging adults and their HCPs) obtained from an overarching study on SDM in adults (18–64 years) in Alberta, Canada. Sociodemographic data were collected and reported descriptively. SDM was the primary outcome variable and was measured dyadically (i.e., the mean score between HCPs and patients) using the Alberta Shared Decision-Making Instrument (ASK-MI). Symptoms of patient anxiety/depression and HRQL were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the EQ-5D-5L. Pearson R correlation matrices were conducted to explore relationships between SDM, anxiety/depression, HRQL, and demographic variables.

    Results

    Forty-two emerging adult patients and 31 HCP dyads were recruited from six community AMH settings and eight primary care settings. The mean SDM dyad rating was 8.69 (SD, ± 2.01), indicating an “excellent” level of SDM. Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and HRQL were not significantly correlated with SDM dyad ratings during the clinic visit. Post hoc analyses showed that patient age was inversely related to SDM dyad ratings; R = −0.34, p = 0.03.

    Discussion

    In this study, emerging adults reported high levels of perceived engagement in SDM, regardless of their HRQL or symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, several limitations, such as the risk of performance bias, should be considered when interpreting these findings. To strengthen the evidence base, future research should aim to address these limitations.

    ❌