Conectar
To critically examine the structural exclusion of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared faculty from academic advancement and promotion pathways and to propose reforms grounded in Boyer's model of scholarship.
The DNP is a practice-focused doctorate established in the United States, distinct from the research-oriented PhD. Similar professional doctorates in the United Kingdom and Australia share the goal of integrating clinical expertise with scholarly inquiry. Despite the rapid growth of DNP programs and the increasing recognition of applied scholarship, many universities continue to privilege traditional research metrics in academic tenure and promotion. This narrow focus on discovery-based outputs marginalises the contributions of DNP faculty in implementation science, systems leadership, and education.
Discursive position paper.
Analysis of policy reports, faculty promotion guidelines, AACN Essentials, and peer-reviewed literature on doctoral education, professional doctorates, and academic equity, 2000–2025.
Current academic evaluation systems sustain hierarchical norms that undervalue practice-based scholarship. This misalignment restricts the career trajectories of DNP-prepared faculty and constrains nursing's leadership in applied innovation. Reframing scholarly legitimacy through Boyer's model of discovery, integration, application, and teaching enables recognition of diverse expertise without compromising academic rigour.
Fully integrating professional doctorates into academic structures requires deliberate reforms in evaluation frameworks, mentorship programs, and institutional policies. Such changes would advance equity, reflect the realities of modern nursing, and align doctoral education with the evolving needs of healthcare systems.
This paper contributes to the international discourse on the future of doctoral education by offering a practical model for inclusive faculty advancement. It also advocates adopting pluralistic definitions of scholarship to support diverse academic career paths in nursing.
No patients, service users, caregivers, or members of the public were involved in the development of this discursive paper. The analysis synthesises existing scholarship, policy documents, and theoretical frameworks and does not draw on primary data requiring patient or public involvement.
To critically examine the safety, sustainability and ethical dimensions of recruiting internationally qualified nurses to Australia. A Global Justice Framework focusing on the political ethics of care is applied to the complexity and practical application of issues raised by the urgent nursing workforce needs in the health and aged care sectors.
A discursive paper based on a critical reading of the literature.
Based broadly on a narrative review, this paper provides a critical analysis of relevant literature identified through CINAHL and PubMed databases. These included peer-reviewed articles, government reports, international guidelines and policy documents. Key issues identified included patient safety, sustainability and ethical considerations pertaining to international nurse migration.
Australia has rigorous standards for assessing the professional competency of Internationally Qualified Registered Nurses to ensure safety. Challenges persist, however, regarding professional integration, retention and adherence to ethical recruitment practices. While nurse migration alleviates workforce shortages in Australia, it exacerbates healthcare deficits in source countries facing critical shortages. Sustainability concerns include ensuring long-term workforce stability and maintaining high-quality care standards. Bilateral agreements must consider the needs of both source and host countries.
Addressing Australia's nursing workforce shortages requires ethical and sustainable recruitment strategies. Workforce demands must be balanced to ensure global health equity while upholding public safety and professional standards for all countries.
Ethical recruitment practices are essential for developing policies and practices that support internationally qualified nurses' professional integration and retention. Establishing robust support systems enables these nurses to adapt effectively to Australian healthcare settings. Strengthening retention strategies fosters workforce stability, minimises attrition and may contribute towards consistent delivery of high-quality and safe patient care.
Historically, Black women have been positioned as primary caretakers and problem-solvers, often expected to bear disproportionate responsibility during times of crisis. There is an enduring image of Black women possessing exceptional strength handed down through generations, captured in the sociocultural phenomenon known as the superwoman schema, or SWS. The aim of this discursive review is to explore health disparities among Black women related to the SWS.
A discursive paper.
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify relevant papers published from 2016 to 2025 that addressed health disparities among Black women.
Through literature review, we identified three critical areas of health disparities associated with mental health disorders, maternal mortality and breast cancer, reflecting the influence of inequitable practices embedded within healthcare systems and society. Nurses, advanced practice nurses and other healthcare providers must prioritise identifying and addressing barriers that hinder access to quality healthcare for Black women. Many providers remain unaware of how depressive symptoms, chronic stress and social determinants impact maternal, mental and breast health outcomes. Encouraging Black women to prioritise mental health, engage in routine prenatal care and seek early breast cancer screening is critical to improving health outcomes. By understanding the historical, societal, and personal contexts of the SWS, nurses can clarify both its benefits and challenges for Black women.
The nursing workforce is central to healthcare delivery, yet racial and ethnic disparities persist. Systemic barriers such as implicit bias, institutional racism, and socioeconomic obstacles hinder the career progression of underrepresented nurses. Addressing these disparities is critical to fostering a diverse workforce that can effectively meet the needs of diverse patient populations.
This paper introduces the Equity-Centered Nursing Leadership Framework (ECNLF), a structured approach to advancing diversity in the nursing workforce. The framework provides strategies for dismantling systemic inequities and establishing sustainable leadership pathways.
Conceptual and theoretical analysis of nursing leadership and workforce equity.
A targeted literature synthesis of peer-reviewed research, policy reports, and theoretical frameworks was conducted. The ECNLF was conceptualised using an integrative approach that examines systemic inequities in nursing leadership and workforce diversity. This framework identifies structural barriers, proposes equity-driven interventions, and outlines strategies for mentorship, leadership development, and policy advocacy.
The ECNLF provides a structured approach for integrating equity-driven leadership development into nursing education and practice. Its implementation is guided by three key pillars: structured mentorship, leadership development, and policy advocacy. The framework supports the establishment of formal mentorship programmes, ensuring that underrepresented nurses have access to career advancement opportunities and leadership training.
Systemic change requires integrating equity frameworks into nursing curricula, adopting structured DEI initiatives in healthcare institutions, and expanding policy-driven funding for leadership development. The ECNLF provides a scalable model for reducing workforce disparities, improving retention, and fostering inclusive nursing leadership that reflects and serves diverse communities.
To propose a normative framework that guides nursing professional organisations to act as human rights intermediaries in the governance of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Discursive paper.
The paper presents a triaxial framework that conceptualises the role of nursing professional organisations in artificial intelligence governance. The framework consists of a domain axis, which identifies key areas of engagement; a modality axis, which aligns actions with the specific functions of these organisations; and a human rights axis, which defines their role towards rights claimants and duty bearers.
The proposed framework provides a practical tool for nursing professional organisations to strategically plan and implement initiatives to influence the advancement and regulation of artificial intelligence. Its application can help ensure that healthcare innovation is equitable and rights-based.
This paper provides a blueprint for nursing leaders and policymakers to engage proactively with the ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence. It emphasises the salient roles of nursing professional organisations in advocating for the human right to health in a technologically driven healthcare landscape.
This paper addresses the gap in how the nursing profession can systematically engage with artificial intelligence governance. The main finding is a novel framework that provides a structured way for nursing professional organisations to act as human rights intermediaries. This research will have a significant impact on nursing leadership, patient advocacy groups, and policymakers involved in healthcare technology and ethics.
Initial parts of this paper were presented to allied health practitioners via a webinar, providing early feedback and dialogue that informed its development.
This paper aims to synthesise the current, global evidence on addressing psychological concerns of women presenting with domestic and family violence within the ED and suggest avenues for future research.
This discursive paper draws on clinical experience and research of the authors and critical synthesis of current literature on management of victim-survivors of DFV presenting with psychological symptoms in ED.
Academic databases and grey literature were systematically searched to identify relevant sources, and findings were narratively synthesised.
DFV victim-survivors often present with mental health symptoms in ED; however, many health professionals in EDs fail to correctly identify the underlying trauma and offer support to address DFV. The most reported barriers to DFV screening/identification include time constraints, privacy issues, and lack of education/training about DFV and its support mechanisms. As a result, only mental health symptoms are being treated, ignoring the broader psychosocial needs of DFV victim-survivors. Use of trauma-informed support models is recommended to address the mental and psychosocial needs of DFV victim-survivors visiting the ED.
DFV victim-survivors visiting the ED are often treated for their mental health symptoms without addressing their underlying trauma and risk of future victimisation. To address the ongoing adverse impact of DFV, it is necessary to ensure holistic and continual support from ED professionals for victims.
The importance of not only education but the implementation of sustained education and training programs surrounding DFV identification, screening, and cannot be understood. DFV is a global problem whereby many victim-survivors become healthcare patients. It would be poor decision making for clinicians to not prioritise appropriate responses to this societal problem within their clinical practice.
To develop a comparative meta-theory of nine caring theories by explicating their assumptions, operative mechanisms and consequences for nursing.
Qualitative meta-theoretical document analysis.
Canonical texts were analysed using an intra-source strategy. Paginated statements were extracted and coded across assumptions, metaparadigm anchors (person, health, environment, nursing and care) and mechanisms linking caring intention to clinical action. Synthesis produced a typology and meta-theoretical propositions.
Caring functioned as a generative principle that reorganised person, health, environment and nursing and care into distinct practice architectures. Six mechanism-based subfamilies were identified: transpersonal caritas; phenomenological and embodied clinical wisdom; ethical and relational caring; cultural and contextual caring; systemic and organisational caring; and operationalisable caring. Ten propositions linked assumptions to mechanisms and expected effects.
The caring school is best understood as an ordered set of non-equivalent caring mechanisms rather than a single doctrine, supporting translation to practice design, education and congruent evaluation.
Mechanism-based comparison can reduce conceptual ambiguity and improve alignment between caring interventions and intended outcomes.
This study addresses the under-specification of how caring theories work. It provides a comparative typology and propositions that make mechanisms explicit, informing nursing education, theory development and caring-based practice in diverse settings.
No EQUATOR reporting checklist is available for meta-theoretical discursive analyses; the manuscript follows Journal of Advanced Nursing guidance for discursive papers.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Hypertension remains a critical health disparity among Black older adults, driven by factors such as socioeconomic inequities, chronic stress and barriers to healthcare access. Within this population, family relationships, particularly intergenerational interactions, significantly influence health behaviours and the management of hypertension remain understudied.
To explore intergenerational factors influencing hypertension prevention and management among Black older adults, focusing on how family relationships impact health behaviours, knowledge transfer and treatment adherence.
A discursive paper applying the Transtheoretical Model of Change and Self-Determination Theory as guiding frameworks to examine the role of family dynamics in hypertension management. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed papers published from 2015 to 2025.
The role of family in health behaviours is examined, including the transmission of health knowledge, caregiving dynamics and emotional support. Both barriers and facilitators to effective hypertension management are identified, including cultural beliefs, community resources and the impact of intergenerational role modelling.
The discussion underscores the need for nurses to adopt family-centred approaches in hypertension management, considering the intergenerational influences on health outcomes. Recommendations for integrating these insights into clinical practice and nursing education are provided.
Understanding the intergenerational context of hypertension management can enhance patient care by improving adherence and prevention strategies. Future research should further explore the role of family in managing hypertension among Black older adults.
To provide an overview of a project aimed at enhancing person-centred surgical care through teamwork and professional development.
A discursive paper with the purpose of describing and discussing the project activities to strengthen person-centred care, teamwork and professional development.
This project aimed to strengthen evidence-based surgical nursing care within a Surgery Department. The overarching goal was to foster an attractive and sustainable work environment for nursing professionals while simultaneously enhancing the quality of person-centred care, thereby improving patient outcomes and safety. Ultimately, the project aimed to position the department as a leading example of excellence in surgical nursing care, where evidence-based practice and person-centred values form the foundation of everyday work.
The activities were guided by previous nursing evidence and aligned with Magnet Hospital standards. Continuous quality improvement efforts and team dialogue were central to achieving the goals. Leadership was provided by experienced nurses and researchers. The structured activities improved patient safety and care quality.
The project was successful as it enhanced precision in surgical nursing care by implementing structured activities focused on person-centred care, patient safety and professional development. These efforts led to improved quality of care and patient outcomes, demonstrating the effectiveness of evidence-based practices.
A project with similar activities to those described in this paper can ensure that surgical patients receive high precision nursing care and serve as an example of promoting person-centred surgical nursing.
None.
None.
To examine practical, ethical, and organisational implications of the use of a key technology deployed in the care of hospitalised people with dementia—visual identifiers—through a comparative analysis with parallel interventions in other spheres of healthcare and social activity.
Discursive paper.
We contrast visual identification systems used for hospitalised patients with dementia with other, ostensibly similar, systems to understand how they differ in key characteristics: what they disclose, to whom and with what intended consequence.
Certain distinctive features of the ways identifier systems are used to improve dementia care appear particularly consequential for their impact. Given how much is expected of such identifiers, they are likely to fail at least a proportion of patients.
We argue that it is important to critically evaluate the interests served by visual identifiers, identifying the dimensions of quality they can enhance and those that may be negatively impacted.
Visual identifiers for people with dementia can contribute to the ‘taskification’ of nursing care, implying that achieving person-centred care is a matter of following defined protocols rather than an emergent, relational, time-consuming process. Staff may end up prioritising risk avoidance and hospital routines (tasks that are measurable and auditable) rather than embracing the unpredictability of developing relationships with patients.
Visual identifiers are a part of well-established strategies to improve hospital care for those with cognitive impairment. While these identifiers aim to prompt healthcare professionals to deliver individually tailored care, research suggests that they are unable to consistently ensure the desirable quality of care. Understanding influences on how they are deployed can help reshape the expectations placed on such low-tech interventions and inform more reflective use.
Patients and public were not directly involved in the development of this discursive paper.
To explore the conceptualisation of social frailty and discuss its role in shaping the disease trajectory of heart failure. Based on the discussion, recommendations on how to prevent and manage social frailty in this clinical cohort are delineated.
A discursive paper.
This paper searched two databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, for a narrative review of the literature related to social frailty and heart failure from 2008 to 2024.
By integrating the conceptualisation of social frailty from different theoretical paradigms, social frailty is a multi-domain construct that relies on a balance between the availability of environmental resources, social interactions and an individual's ability to maintain and acquire these resources to enhance their well-being. Substantial evidence showed the prognostic impact of social frailty on patient-reported, functional and clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure. The underlying mechanism is still under-investigated, but heart failure-related self-care may mediate its impact. Based on this evidence, improving social frailty may rely on a diagnostic protocol to enhance the person-centred care planning on ways to optimise the social resources to support complex self-care.
Social frailty poses a greater risk to health outcomes in patients with heart failure. Further research is needed to explore determinants and interventions for social frailty in this population.
This paper increases the awareness of social frailty in heart failure patients and provides important insights on how to combat this social determinant of poor health outcomes among this clinical cohort. A dual-purpose approach of improving social resources and self-care behaviours may have great promise in reducing their social frailty, and this postulation will need to be investigated in future research.
There is no involvement of patients or the public in the design or writing of this discursive paper.
To propose a conceptual model of dignity-centred care for hospitalised older adults using Levine's Conservation Model as a theoretical framework.
A discursive approach.
Data were obtained from an extensive search of five databases and grey literature without date restrictions for information on patient dignity, dignified care for hospitalised older adults and the Levine Conservation Model.
Dignity is a multifaceted concept encompassing an inherent self-worth and self-worth acquired through personal accomplishments and associations. Hospitalised older adults are at risk of dignity erosion due to complex health conditions, poor healthcare professional- patient communication, inadequate health information, loss of autonomy, inadequate privacy, and infrastructural and systemic barriers. Key components of dignified care include respect, autonomy, privacy, effective symptom management, effective communication and active patient involvement in decision-making. The proposed conceptual model integrates Levine's principles of conservation into a dignity-centred care framework. This model identifies threats to dignity in hospitalised older adults and outlines practical interventions to mitigate these threats in order to maintain or restore dignity.
The proposed conceptual model of dignity in care for hospitalised older adults, underpinned by the Levine Conservation Model, offers a practical framework to guide healthcare professionals in providing care that upholds the dignity and well-being of older adults. The model can serve as a foundation for developing institutional policies and training programmes that reflect the multidimensional nature of dignity in care for older adults.
The study addressed both the conceptual ambiguity and skills gap surrounding dignity-centred care for older adults by offering a practical guide for integrating dignity-centred principles into routine clinical practice. The findings hold substantial relevance for healthcare practice, providing a structured, theory-informed model to advance dignity-centred care and protect the dignity of hospitalised older adults.
Not applicable.
To establish the suitability of self-determination theory as a theoretical framework to inform research and design of digital applications for nurses' well-being.
This discursive paper describes the background and core premises of self-determination theory and explains its relevance as a theoretical framework to support research and the design of digital applications to promote nurses' well-being.
Increasing numbers of digital applications are being used by nurses, but few are supported by clearly explicated theoretical frameworks. Self-determination theory focuses on how people's innate psychological needs interact and are influenced by the social environments where they live and work. Given the influence the social environment can have on well-being, self-determination theory is well suited as a theoretical framework to inform research and design of digital applications promoting nurses' well-being.
Stress and burnout impact nurses worldwide, to the detriment of staff well-being, their retention in health services, and provision of patient care. The rapid development and ubiquitous use of digital applications by nurses make researching their effectiveness vitally important if nurses' well being is to be supported. Self-determination theory provides a theoretical framework useful for these applications.
Through the lens of self-determination theory, researchers, digital application designers, and organisations can garner further insights to support digital application development and implementation for the well-being of nurses.
This paper has international relevance and can assist researchers, application designers, and organisations interested in promoting nurses' well-being through understanding the applicability and usefulness of self-determination theory as a theoretical framework for the design of digital applications for nurses' well-being.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To characterise and analyse doctoral programmes in nursing in Latin America through an exhaustive review of the official websites of the universities.
Descriptive and multiple correspondence analysis. Existing programmes were mapped out, identifying their geographic distribution and curricular characteristics.
A review of 59 doctoral programmes in nursing was conducted through the official web portals of universities in Latin America that were currently available (as of 2025) and that provided the required information. Thereafter, a matrix was built in Excel to consolidate the data.
The study identified an increase in the number of doctoral programmes in nursing offered in Latin America. Furthermore, these programmes were found to be more strongly concentrated in countries such as Brazil, Peru and Mexico, while other countries, including Guatemala and Uruguay, have recently incorporated such training.
Doctoral education in nursing in Latin America has experienced significant growth in recent years, consolidating itself as a fundamental pillar for the development of the discipline and the generation of knowledge in health. However, structural challenges persist, including limited funding for research, a lack of cooperation between universities, and the absence of programmes focused on Advanced Nursing Practice.
This contribution helps identify trends in the offering of doctoral programmes and inequalities in their geographic distribution, allowing for an understanding of how training varies across countries in the region while also consolidating Nursing as an academic and professional discipline.
To critically reflect on a transnational, clinically embedded doctoral journey undertaken during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and to draw conceptual and systemic lessons for doctoral education and clinical academic nursing pathways.
Reflective accounts of doctoral study exist, yet few examine practice-based PhDs conducted across different countries and health systems during a global crisis. This paper analyses one such pathway—enrolment at an Australian university with research embedded within the UK National Health Service—to explore resilience, identity formation, mentorship ecologies and organisational conditions that support or hinder clinical academic development.
Using analytic autoethnography and reflective case study logic, experiential data (field notes, supervisory records, ethics correspondence, project artefacts and publication trajectories) were synthesised with relevant scholarship. A conceptual framework, the TCAD lens, was developed to structure analysis across contexts, constraints, mechanisms and outcomes.
Four phases are outlined: starting in crisis as a senior ICU nurse, transitioning to lead educator, serving as surgical matron while implementing changes, and moving into academia to complete the thesis by publication. Dual ethics and governance procedures, contractual arrangements and GDPR-compliant data stewardship imposed significant administrative burdens but fostered global literacy and networks. Mentorship functioned as an ecology—supportive, critical, pragmatic and strategic—evolving towards independence. COVID-19 served as a stress test, narrowing scope while improving the feasibility and sustainability of the family member's voice reorientation intervention. Personal adversity intersected with identity development, with compassionate supervision enabling timely completion (3.7 years) and five peer-reviewed publications.
Transnational, clinically embedded doctoral pathways can enhance nursing research capacity but require deliberate institutional design: genuine protected time, cross-jurisdictional support and mentorship ecosystems. The TCAD lens provides a transferable framework for educators, supervisors and health systems.
Recommendations cover programme development, cross-border oversight, NHS–university collaborations, funding arrangements in different currencies and resilience infrastructure for clinician–researchers.
To demonstrate and reflect upon the methodological lessons by which healthcare organizations can address questions of environmental sustainability related to single-use healthcare materials.
A cross-sectional multi-centre study in hospitals was performed, followed by an exploratory analysis of the sustainability of commonly used healthcare materials.
A hospital survey was conducted to collect the procurement data for single-use medical materials. Based on consumption and cost, five single-use medical materials with sustainable alternatives were selected using different reuse strategies. Single-use and reusable materials were assessed through an exploratory literature review and document study based on four parameters: environmental sustainability, safety, cost and efficiency.
A pragmatic method emerged from this study, providing healthcare facilities with tools to select environmentally sustainable alternatives to replace single-use options. First, an inventory of single-use medical materials consumed was collected. Next, single-use materials were prioritized for further study based on criteria such as cost, volume of the material, feasibility and input of stakeholders. We then analysed the prioritized single-use materials and their alternatives based on life cycle assessments or available information on their different life stages. Finally, we assessed safety, costs and efficiency related to the process following the use of the medical material.
This pragmatic method can guide healthcare institutions in making the most sustainable choices of medical materials and achieving sustainability goals within their institutions and nationwide.
Patient care involves a large consumption of single-use medical materials with considerable environmental impact. A pragmatic method was developed to guide healthcare institutions in making the most sustainable choices regarding the use of single-use healthcare materials. Healthcare institutions, ideally represented by a green team including nurses and other relevant professionals, can use this method to reduce the use of single-use medical materials, thereby yielding positive outcomes for the entire population.
No patient or public contribution.
Clinical research nurses work at the fulcrum of clinical trials with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. In England, the National Institute for Health Research (the main funder of health research) has broadened its scope to encompass social care research. The expectation is that clinical research nurses will expand their skill set to support these new studies, many of which will employ qualitative and mixed methods. This discussion paper explores the challenges of facilitating this clinical academic workforce development through a case study of a homeless health and social care research project. This was one of the first studies to engage clinical research nurses in this new and expanded role.
Much of what is known about the research nurse workforce has been generated through studies of clinical trials in oncology. The ‘caring-recruiting’ dichotomy has been used as a heuristic device for identifying workforce issues that can impact on study delivery such as how intense pressure to recruit study participants leads to low job satisfaction.
This case study reflects on the authors' experiences of employing a clinical research nurse in a social care research project concerned with the discharge of homeless people from hospital. The ‘caring-recruiting’ dichotomy is used to generate new information about the relationship between workforce development and the successful delivery of social care research.
The case study illuminates how social care research can generate different pressures and ethical challenges for research nurses. The time and skill it took to recruit study participants identified as ‘hard to reach’ was suggestive of the need to move beyond performance measures that prioritise recruitment metrics. The need for different types of staff supervision and training was also warranted as supporting study participants who were homeless was often distressing, leading to professional boundary issues.
This study highlights that performance management, training and supervisory arrangements must be tailored to the characteristics of each new study coming onto the portfolio to ensure research nurses are fully supported in this new and expanded role.
To highlight the need for the development of effective and realistic workforce strategies for critical care nurses, in both a steady state and pandemic.
In acute care settings, there is an inverse relationship between nurse staffing and iatrogenesis, including mortality. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus on how to determine safe staffing levels. Intensive care units (ICU) provide highly specialised complex healthcare treatments. In developed countries, mortality rates in the ICU setting are high and significantly varied after adjustment for diagnosis. The variability has been attributed to systems, patient and provider issues including the workload of critical care nurses.
Discursive paper.
Nursing workforce is the single most influential mediating variable on ICU patient outcomes. Numerous systematic reviews have been undertaken in an effort to quantify the effect of critical care nurses on mortality and morbidity, invariably leading to the conclusion that the association is similar to that reported in acute care studies. This is a consequence of methodological limitations, inconsistent operational definitions and variability in endpoint measures. We evaluated the impact inadequate measurement has had on capturing relevant critical care data, and we argue for the need to develop effective and realistic ICU workforce measures.
COVID-19 has placed an unprecedented demand on providing health care in the ICU. Mortality associated with ICU admission has been startling during the pandemic. While ICU systems have largely remained static, the context in which care is provided is profoundly dynamic and the role and impact of the critical care nurse needs to be measured accordingly. Often, nurses are passive recipients of unplanned and under-resourced changes to workload, and this has been brought into stark visibility with the current COVID-19 situation. Unless critical care nurses are engaged in systems management, achieving consistently optimal ICU patient outcomes will remain elusive.
Objective measures commonly fail to capture the complexity of the critical care nurses’ role despite evidence to indicate that as workload increases so does risk of patient mortality, job stress and attrition. Critical care nurses must lead system change to develop and evaluate valid and reliable workforce measures.
This discussion paper explores the group experience of a cohort of eight nurses completing our university's first professional nursing doctorate programme.
This paper aims to make sense of our shared experience and to contribute to what is known about doctoral study by sharing our insights.
Discursive paper.
Through individual and group reflections on our experience, we address the questions ‘why did we stay’? and ‘how do we make sense of the fact that we all, as a group, successfully completed the programme’? We drew on principles of collaborative and collective auto-ethnography to guide our group reflexivity in response to these questions.
The main reasons we gave for staying were: (i) commitment, which had three strands - ‘proving’, ‘obligation’ and ‘self-determination’ - and (ii) shared-identity and common humanity. The two further elements that helped us make sense of our cohort's completion were (i) the joy of learning together and (ii) professional friendship and Socratic inquiry.
As the first programme cohort for the nursing doctorate in our area, we became a close and supportive group, which we argue contributed to our success. We ascribed this to our characteristics as doctoral students and the creation of a sisterhood reminiscent of a community of practice. We also acknowledged the importance of the WhatsApp platform in facilitating group cohesion, and the sense of reflexive closure brought by the process of reflection at the end of our programme.
We recommend that doctoral cohorts, supervisors, and teaching teams systematically plan opportunities into programmes for organic relationship development and consider how the literature on communities of practice and academic persistence might support academic development. Academic staff could also encourage students to set up an online communication channel such as WhatsApp or similar at an early stage in their programmes and give particular consideration to closure and transition to post-doctoral practice on completion of professional doctorates.
The purpose of this manuscript is to offer an overview of knowledge regarding Evidence-Based Practice and implementation science. It addresses the question: What are the EBP implementation models used in nursing settings?
Discursive paper.
The databases were searched with the following keywords: ‘Nursing Faculty’, ‘Nurse educator’, ‘Academic’, ‘clinic’, ‘Evidence-based implementation’, ‘evidence-based practice’, ‘implementation’, ‘implementation science’, ‘undergraduate’, ‘nurse’. The search strategy aims to identify published studies. Eight databases were searched.
There are specific implementation models for implementing EBP: the IOWA Model, the Stetler Model, the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model, the Stevens Star Model, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS), the Advancing Research and Clinical practice through close collaboration (ARCC) model. They were analysed according to the Nilsen classification. An evidence-based implementation project must be structured. First, it is necessary to choose an implementation model, then identify one or more implementation strategies, and finally, plan evaluation for implementation outcome. The use of implementation science ensures successful implementation or at least highlights barriers that need adjustment. Effective utilisation of implementation science facilitates the transfer of obtained results to similar contexts.
Implementation science complements the EBP process perfectly and ensures the proper implementation of evidence.
EBP mentors now have the entire structure of implementation science to succeed in implementing evidence-based data in both academic and clinical settings.
The discursive paper addresses the difficulties of implementing evidence in academic or clinical settings. Implementation science is the bridge between evidence and practice. Nurses now have everything they need to implement evidence-based practice successfully.
There was no patient or public involvement in the design or writing of this discursive article.
FreshRSS 