Conectar
Preventing loss of autonomy has become a public health issue due to the increase in healthcare costs associated with ageing. It has become even more pressing with the arrival of the baby-boomer generation. This has given rise to several initiatives. This is the background to the VIVADOM project. The project provides a complete kit for older adults aged 60 years and over living at home. First, the kit includes a technological package (telecare, light path and digital tablet). Then, these older adults benefit from personalised human support provided by postal workers trained in gerontology. The aim of this study will be to carry out a health economic assessment (HEA) of the VIVADOM project as part of the prevention of frailty and/or dependency (by comparing beneficiaries of the complete kit with non-beneficiaries). The comparator will be the fact of not benefiting from the complete kit. In addition, the efficiency of the project in preventing falls and cognitive problems will be studied. We will calculate three incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for these three issues.
The economic model used will be the Markov model. Transition probabilities, average costs and average quality-adjusted life year (QALY) will be calculated for the two groups being compared. The ICER will be obtained by dividing the difference in average costs by the difference in average QALYs. Finally, ICERs will be compared with willingness-to-pay (WTP) to assess the efficiency of the system. Thus, the VIVADOM project will be efficient when these ICERs are lower than the WTP. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be carried out to ensure the robustness of the analysis results.
The HEA of the VIVADOM project has been approved by the research unit of the University of Limoges in France. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.
Mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (MHL) is increasingly identified owing to various underlying conditions. Minimally invasive biopsy techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (TBMC) and transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), are common diagnosis tools. However, their safety and diagnostic efficiency remain unclear. This trial aims to compare the diagnostic yield and safety of these three techniques.
This study is a three-arm, parallel-design, randomised controlled trial involving 972 adult patients with MHL recruited from multiple medical centres. Participants will be randomly assigned to the EBUS-TBNA, TBMC via a tunnel or TBFB via a tunnel group. The primary outcome is diagnostic yield, and the secondary outcomes include diagnostic sensitivity, sample quality and procedure-related complications. Statistical analyses will be conducted using the appropriate methods. An independent sample ² test will be used to test the differences in the diagnostic yield and incidence of procedure-related complications.
Ethics approval was obtained from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital Ethics Committee (2022-KY-194).
Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients or their guardians before their enrolment in the study. This study will be conducted per the principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Council for Harmonisation Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.
Digital inclusion (which includes skills, accessibility and connectivity to the internet and digital devices) is a ‘super social determinant of health’ because it affects many aspects of life that influence health. Older people are especially vulnerable to digital exclusion. Existing digital inclusion interventions are commonly offered opportunistically to people who come into contact with services, or in specific locations. The lack of systematic identification of need unintentionally excludes older people who may be most in need of support, and that support is not addressing their needs.
This multi-method project includes six workstreams: (1) A survey of people aged 65+ to ask about digital use and engagement. Survey data will be used to develop a model that predicts digital exclusion from data available in primary care records. (2) Testing, via a further survey, the external validity of the model to identify those who are digitally excluded. (3) Interviews with community service providers to identify, understand and define the components of existing digital inclusion services for older people. Concurrently, a rapid review of the literature will identify evidence for interventions aimed at supporting digitally excluded adults aged 65+. (4) Interviews with people aged 65+ representing a range of digital use will explore factors from the COM-B model that influence digital behaviours—their capability (C), opportunity (O) and motivation (M) relating to digital engagement. Analysis outputs will identify the intersectional nature of barriers or facilitators to digital inclusion. (5) Co-production workshops with older people and community service providers will identify key components of interventions that are required to address digital exclusion. Components will be mapped against existing interventions, and the ‘best fit’ intervention(s) refined. An implementation plan will be developed in parallel. (6) Feasibility testing of the refined intervention(s) to assess acceptability and obtain feedback on content and delivery mechanisms.
This study was approved by the Yorkshire & The Humber - Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee on 23 October 2023 (ref. 23/YH/0234). Findings will be disseminated in academic journals and shared at webinars, seminars, conferences and events arranged by organisations operating across the digital inclusion and older people fields.
Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective biomedical intervention for HIV prevention, but its access and utilisation are challenging, especially in high-burden settings such as Kenya. For potential PrEP users, long delays and repeated consultations with several providers are obstacles to both PrEP uptake and continuation. The One-Stop PrEP Care project aims to promote the use of PrEP among clients in the health system and enhance client satisfaction by reducing the waiting time.
We are conducting a 1:1 cluster-randomised trial to evaluate whether One-Stop PrEP Care achieves equivalent or better PrEP outcomes compared with the standard of care model in 12 high-volume HIV clinics in Kisumu County, Kenya. In the One-Stop model, all core PrEP components, including HIV risk evaluation, HIV testing and PrEP dispensing, are provided by one provider in a single consultation room. Programme data from ≥2400 new PrEP clients will be abstracted for 12 months each to obtain primary endpoints of PrEP initiation and continuation. Adherence will be assessed via blood drug level testing. A nested cohort of up to 300 PrEP clients will be enrolled and followed every 3 months to provide in-depth data on individual HIV prevention behaviour, risk perception and how they align PrEP use with perceived risk. We will also evaluate programme costs.
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (IRB) on 8 July 2022 (IRB ID: STUDY00015873) and the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (SERU) with a letter dated 4 May 2023 (Ref: 4697). Project findings will be shared with stakeholders, including the Ministry of Health, County health officials and participants. Results will be disseminated through manuscripts, policy briefs and health meetings.
Plans for communicating important protocol modifications include timely notifications to all study team members and training on the changes, and updates to relevant stakeholders, including the two IRBs, through protocol amendment submissions.
V. 2.0 dated 21 May 2024.
Neonatal death and later disability remain common sequelae of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) despite the now standard use of therapeutic hypothermia (HT). New therapeutic approaches to brain protection are required. Melatonin is an indolamine hormone with free-radical scavenging, antiapoptotic, anti-inflammatory and gene regulatory neuroprotective properties, which has extensive preclinical evidence of safety and efficacy. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data suggest it is necessary to reach melatonin levels of 15–30 mg/L within 6–8 hours of hypoxia-ischaemia for brain protection. We developed a novel Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) grade melatonin in ethanol 50 mg/mL solution for intravenous use. In preclinical studies, ethanol is an adjuvant excipient with additional neuroprotective benefit; optimised dosing protocols can achieve therapeutic melatonin levels while limiting blood alcohol concentrations (BACs).
The Acute High Dose Melatonin for Encephalopathy of the Newborn (ACUMEN) Study is a first-in-human, international, multicentre, phase 1 safety study of intravenous melatonin in babies with moderate/severe HIE receiving HT. Sixty babies will be studied over two phases: a dose escalation study including four dose levels to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), followed by a 6-month cohort expansion study of RP2D to further characterise PKs and affirm safety. Participants will receive a 2-hour intravenous infusion of melatonin within 6 hours of birth, followed by five maintenance doses every 12 hours to cover the period of HT. Plasma melatonin and BACs will be monitored. The RP2D will be based on the attainment of therapeutic melatonin levels while limiting BACs and the frequency of dose-limiting events (DLEs). A Bayesian Escalation with Overdose Control approach will be used to estimate the risk of DLE per dose level, with a target level of
Approval has been given by the London Central National Health Service Health Research Authority Ethics Committee (25/LO/0170) and UK Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Separate approvals have been sought in Ireland and Australia. Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations, public registries and plain language summaries for parent/legal guardian(s), in accordance with national requirements.
ISRCTN61218504. EU CT: 2025-520538-49-00.
Publication based on the UK protocol V.3.0, 08 May 2025
Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of infectious disease deaths, particularly among people living with HIV (PWH). Despite being preventable, TB preventive therapy (TPT) uptake is low in high-burden regions like South Africa, where new guidelines have expanded TPT eligibility and introduced shorter, more effective regimens like 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP). As differentiated service delivery models for HIV care have proven effective, there is increasing recognition that decentralising TPT delivery may improve coverage and completion. This study explores whether a community-based TPT delivery strategy can enhance uptake and completion of TPT compared with traditional clinic-based services.
We will conduct a household-randomised, non-blinded, controlled trial. Persons eligible for TPT will be recruited from the TB TRIAGE+Trial study, a community-based household TB screening study. Households containing at least one person eligible for TPT will be randomised 1:1 to either community-based TPT or standard-of-care clinic referral for TPT. At enrolment, all participants will be provided with a 2-week supply of TPT in the community. Participants randomised to the community arm will receive the entire course of TPT in a single dispense (12 weeks of 3HP or 6 months of isoniazid, if 3HP is contraindicated). Clinic-arm participants will be referred to their local clinic for the remainder of their course of TPT and will collect TPT refills on the clinic-determined schedule. Our primary outcome is the proportion of participants who complete a course of TPT. Secondary outcomes include overall adherence to TPT, predictors of adherence with TPT, participant satisfaction with the assigned TPT delivery method and adverse events.
The study and its tools were approved by the Human Sciences Research Councils Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2/25/10/23), based in Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, as well as the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (Study 00018448). Study findings will be shared through the community advisory group and local stakeholder meetings, relevant international and local meetings/conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
NCT06214910. Date and version: 3.0, 30 July 2024.
International consensus guidelines support the initial administration of 30 mL/kg of intravenous fluids for haemodynamic resuscitation of newly diagnosed septic shock. Practice variation exists between the volume of fluids administered and timing of vasopressor commencement. The optimal approach in patients with septic shock is uncertain.
Australasian Resuscitation In Sepsis Evaluation: FLUid or vasopressors In emergency Department Sepsis is a 1000-participant multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group clinical trial conducted in patients with septic shock presenting to the emergency department in participating sites in Australia, New Zealand and Ireland. Participants are randomised (1:1) to either restricted fluids and early vasopressors or a larger initial intravenous fluid volume and later vasopressors. The primary outcome is days alive and out of hospital at day 90 postrandomisation. Secondary outcomes are all-cause mortality at day 90, time from randomisation until death (to day 90), days alive and at home at day 90 and ventilator-free, vasopressor-free and renal replacement-free days to day 28 postrandomisation and death or disability at 6-month and 12-month postrandomisation. Health-related quality of life will be assessed at day 180 and 12 months following randomisation.
The study was approved by Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC2020/ETH02874) on 21 January 2021. Patients will be enrolled under a waiver of prior consent. The patient or next-of-kin (or equivalent according to local jurisdiction) is approached at the first available opportunity and given a trial information sheet. According to local approvals, the patient or next-of-kin chooses to either continue in the trial or opt-out/decline continued participation. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.
Acknowledging equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in research is not only a moral imperative but also an important step in avoiding bias and ensuring generalisability of results. This protocol describes the development of STAndards for ReporTing EDI (START-EDI) in research, which will provide a set of minimum standards to help researchers improve their consistency, completeness and transparency in EDI reporting. We anticipate that these guidelines will benefit authors, reviewers, editors, funding organisations, healthcare providers, patients and the public.
To create START-EDI reporting guidelines, the following five stages are proposed: (i) establish a diverse, multidisciplinary Steering Committee that will lead and coordinate guideline development; (ii) a systematic review to identify the essential principles and methodological approaches for EDI to generate preliminary checklist items; (iii) conduct an international Delphi process to reach a consensus on the checklist items; (iv) finalise the reporting guidelines and create a separate explanation and elaboration document; and (v) broad dissemination and implementation of START-EDI guidelines. We will work with patient and public involvement representatives and under-served groups in research throughout the project stages.
The study has received ethical approval from the Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (study ID: 7592283). The reporting guidelines will be published in open access peer-reviewed publications and presented in international conferences, and disseminated through community networks and forums.
The project is pre-registered within the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8udbq/) and the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Network.
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a serious public health problem since it is linked to loss of muscular function and independence, especially in older adults. In this study, the researchers have proposed a randomised controlled trial with a three-arm study strategy to explore the effectiveness of an oral nutritional supplementation containing hydroxymethylbutyrate and undenatured type-II collagen combined with exercise training (ET) on the OA-related symptoms and biomarkers among adults with knee OA.
Adults with knee OA aged between 50 years and 75 years will be invited to participate in the study and thereafter will be randomly assigned to either one of three groups: oral nutrition supplementation+ET, ET or usual care. The primary outcomes include changes in OA-related symptoms and biomarkers. The secondary outcomes include changes in body composition, blood profiles, physical fitness, quality of life, dietary intake, disability, psychology status and morphological changes of the knee.
Ethics approval was granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the National University of Malaysia (reference number JEP-2024–264). Findings of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed presentations at scientific conferences as well as open access publications.
Campaigns to support pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) for cigarettes have enhanced their effectiveness, but little to no research on campaign messages to support little cigars and cigarillos (LCC) pictorial HWLs exists. The goal of this study was to examine the effectiveness of messages to augment pictorial HWLs on LCCs among priority populations.
Online survey-based experiment.
Qualtrics research panel online of US adults, recruited between January and February 2023.
Adults ages 21–29 who reported current cigar use and reside in the USA.
Participants (n=315) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) messages designed to elaborate pictorial HWLs, (2) pictorial HWLs alone and (3) messages and pictorial HWLs paired together.
Within conditions, participants were shown six negative health effects of LCCs and answered questions about perceived message effectiveness (PME), negative affect, thinking about risks (TAR) and self-reported learning (SRL) as well as questions on quit intention, concern about their health and reactance. Using mixed-effects models and ANOVA, we evaluated for differences across conditions.
Most participants identified as male (60%) and either Black (45%) or White (45%). PME was very high across all three conditions (≥ 3.85) but no difference between conditions in a statistically significant manner (p=0.18). Mixed-effects models indicated that negative affect varied across conditions, highest in condition 2 (3.76; 95% CI 3.58, 3.94) and lowest in condition 3 (3.44; 95% CI 3.27, 3.61) (p=0.01), and showed no statistically significant difference between conditions for SRL (p=0.31) or TAR (p=0.43). No statistically significant difference was noted for quit intentions (p=0.16), health concern (p=0.28) or reactance (p=0.84).
Pictorial HWLs, campaign messages and the combination of the conditions were all perceived as very effective, with little differences in PME. Such findings indicate that pictorial HWLs on LCCs and communication messages about LCCs both appear as promising approaches to reducing LCC use among target populations. Longitudinal studies with ongoing exposure may identify factors that can enhance the effectiveness of campaign messages to enhance pictorial HWLs for LCCs.
Dyslipidaemia, affecting approximately 39% of adults worldwide, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Individuals with dyslipidaemia are often prescribed statins, which effectively lower plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), thereby reducing the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. Although statins lower LDL-C, emerging evidence suggests that they may counteract the beneficial adaptations to exercise in skeletal muscle mitochondria and whole-body aerobic capacity. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and there is a need for studies investigating how statins influence molecular adaptations to exercise. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the combined effects of statin therapy and focused exercise training on mitochondrial function and whole-body aerobic capacity in people with dyslipidaemia. The untargeted proteomic analysis will be incorporated to provide detailed insights into how statins may affect mitochondrial proteins and other muscle metabolic traits, offering molecular explanations for altered functional readouts at both the muscle and whole-body levels.
A total of 100 women and men (aged 40–65 years) diagnosed with dyslipidaemia without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease will be enrolled in this 12-week, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Participants will be randomised into one of four groups using a block randomisation approach to ensure an allocation ratio of 60:40 for exercise and non-exercise conditions, respectively. The four groups will be: (1) exercise+placebo, (2) exercise+atorvastatin (80 mg/day), (3) atorvastatin (80 mg/day) and (4) placebo. The primary outcome is mitochondrial function, measured by changes in skeletal muscle citrate synthase activity from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include whole-body aerobic capacity (VO2peak) and proteomic analyses. Genetic analysis will be conducted to assess the role of genetic polymorphisms in individual responses to statins and exercise.
The trial has received ethical approval from the Faroe Islands Ethical Committee (2024-10) and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a multifactorial disease in which low-grade inflammation is considered to play a pivotal role. Although colchicine is a widely used anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of gout, its effect in OA is still disputed due to inconsistent results of short-term clinical trials. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of long-term colchicine 0.5 mg once daily on the incidence of knee or hip replacements in patients with knee or hip OA.
The ECHO trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in which 1200 participants with knee or hip OA tolerant to colchicine during a 30-day run-in period will be 1:1 randomised to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily or matching placebo using concealed allocation. The primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to the first knee or hip replacement assessed up to 4.5 years. Secondary endpoints include course of pain, physical function, joint space narrowing, low-grade inflammation, quality of life, clinical or radiological onset of OA in a new joint group other than present at baseline, number of participants using pain medication during the study, onset of new cardiovascular events (ie, myocardial infarction, ischaemia-driven coronary revascularisation, ischaemic stroke, peripheral artery disease or cardiovascular death) and direct and indirect costs related to treatment and disease burden due to OA. Harm-related endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events, the number of withdrawals due to (serious) adverse events and changes in laboratory data (ie, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate and alanine transferase) throughout the study. The primary analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
This trial has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee East-Netherlands. Findings will be presented at scientific meetings and published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Early MRI use varies in the management of acute wrist injuries in the UK, with only a minority of National Health Service (NHS) centres being able to offer this to patients. In this study, we aim to explore the perspectives of staff and patients on the use of early MRI in the management of wrist injuries.
This is a cross-sectional qualitative study using semistructured, face-to-face and remote interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
10 NHS Trusts in the UK.
We interviewed a sample consisting of 37 NHS staff members and 21 patients.
We analysed the data into three overarching themes. The first theme described the negative impact of wrist injuries on both staff and patients. Staff reported an uncomfortable feeling that they had ‘short-changed’ patients with older non-MRI based pathways, and that the consequences of missing a scaphoid fracture could be a ‘horrible thing’ for patients. The second theme described how early MRI was perceived as a ‘win for everyone’. For patients, the win encompassed the relief of a speedy diagnosis which helped them to get better. Staff saw early MRI as a win because it ‘revolutionised care’ and ‘reduced the clinic footprint’. The final theme defined the key ingredients of delivering an early MRI pathway: a simple pathway with clear accountability, timely access to MRI and prompt reporting of results, a safe pathway with safety nets to avoid patients being lost, data and audit of the time to MRI and definitive treatment, bottom-up engagement, clear communication and looking after your team.
Our findings contribute to a better understanding of stakeholders’ perspectives on wrist injury pathways in the UK NHS.
Acute pain is commonly experienced by millions of patients who undergo outpatient surgical procedures. Moreover, an increasing number of procedures are performed on an outpatient basis, requiring greater postoperative planning to ensure effective pain management. Analgesic approaches commonly involve prescription opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but an optimal regimen that balances pain and adverse effects has not been identified. In addition, critical gaps in evidence exist regarding how opioids and NSAIDs compare as analgesic regimens after surgery.
The Comparing Analgesic Regimen Effectiveness and Safety after Surgery (CARES) trial is a pragmatic, international, multicentre randomised trial that enrols adults undergoing three elective surgical procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, breast lumpectomy, hernia repair). Participants are randomised to receive discharge analgesic prescriptions that consist of either NSAIDs or low-dose opioids (ie, 10 pills of oxycodone 5 mg or equivalent), with both groups prescribed acetaminophen around-the-clock. The primary effectiveness outcome is patient-reported worst daily pain intensity over the first 7 days after surgery. The primary safety outcome is the occurrence of opioid and/or NSAID side effects over the first 7 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes are assessed by patient report and medical record review at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and include sleep disturbance, patient perception of improvement/change after treatment, pain interference, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, clinically important adverse events, substance use, opioid misuse, chronic pain, healthcare utilisation related to pain and quality of recovery.
Investigational review boards at the University of Michigan and other sites have approved the CARES trial. The first patient enrolled in CARES in February 2023, with recruitment anticipated through 2026. Dissemination builds on the input of patient partners and other members of an engaged Stakeholder Advisory Board, with activities spanning co-production of summaries to share results with study participants, publications in biomedical journals and lay press, presentations to scientific and community organisations, and other multimedia communication materials.
FreshRSS 