Despite the high prevalence of chronic low back pain (cLBP), its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Addressing modifiable psychosocial resources and health behaviours such as physical activity offers a promising avenue for reducing the impact of cLBP. Furthermore, although the relationship between physical activity and pain is theorised as a within-person process, previous research has primarily focused on between-person differences. In this article, we present the protocol for the prospective observational study PRIA (Psychologie und Rückengesundheit im Alltag), which is part of a larger interdisciplinary research consortium investigating preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of cLBP. Drawing on theories from health and pain psychology, the outlined study examines the interplay between different dimensions of cLBP and back health, physical activity and their psychosocial determinants within individuals in their everyday lives.

This prospective longitudinal study combines online questionnaires with ecological momentary assessment of health behaviours, cognitions, affect, social support and pain using a smartphone-based app (movisensXS) and continuous measurement of physical activity by accelerometry (movisens Move 4). Parameters will be recorded at baseline (T0), daily for the following 14 days (five times per day at 09:00, 12:00, 15:00, 18:00 and 21:00, resulting in up to 70 measurement occasions), 3 and 6 months later (T1 and T2). A total of 230 participants (115 individuals with cLBP and 115 without cLBP) aged 18–64 years will be enrolled. The associations between cLBP and the measured parameters will be examined using multilevel models.

The university’s ethics committee at the MSB Medical School Berlin approved the study on 8 March 2021 (approval number MSB-2021/59, amendment approved on 10 November 2023, amendment number MSB-2023/145). Ethical approval for the FOR 5177 initial screening was granted by Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA1/058/21). All participants provided written informed consent. The results of this research will be published in peer-reviewed international journals, presented at national and international conferences, and reported to the German Research Foundation.

DRKS00032978.

Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers have a 20–46% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) due to mismatch repair gene variants. Mesalamine (5-ASA, 5-aminosalicylic acid), used safely in patients with ulcerative colitis, may reduce CRC risk in LS by decreasing microsatellite instability, a key driver of LS-related cancer. This study evaluates 5-ASA’s efficacy as a tolerable chemopreventive drug, aiming to improve long-term CRC prevention in LS.

This multicentre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, two-arm, phase II clinical study will compare the effects of a 2-year daily intake of 5-ASA (2000 mg) to placebo in LS carriers. The primary objective is to assess whether mesalamine reduces colorectal neoplasia, both benign and malignant, compared with placebo in LS carriers, as detected by colonoscopy at the end of the treatment period (24 months±1 month) and on study completion. Secondary objectives include evaluating whether 5-ASA reduces neoplasia/tumour multiplicity and progression compared with placebo at specified time points, examining variations in the effects of 5-ASA versus placebo based on cancer history, sex and age (

The trial is currently open for enrolment, having received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm and funding from the Swedish Research Council. The study protocol is the finalised V.10.0 (11 April 2024), transitioned to the European Clinical Trials Information System. LS remains underdiagnosed, which may limit recruitment. The results are of global interest and will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04920149. EudraCT: 2019-003011-55. EU CT: 2024-514765-19-01.

Due to the documented benefits of peripheral resistance training (RT) and inspiratory resistance training, known as inspiratory muscle training (IMT), in patients with cardiovascular disease, both exercise forms are regularly used in cardiac rehabilitation. However, little is known about the haemodynamic responses to different intensities of dynamic RT, isometric RT, and IMT in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study is designed to evaluate and compare the acute haemodynamic responses elicited by different RT and IMT modalities in patients with CAD.

This study design is a prospective, single-centre, randomised crossover trial. A total of 20 participants with CAD will be included. All participants will undergo four different exercise training interventions: IMT, isometric wall squat training (IWS), dynamic leg press training (DLP) and isometric handgrip training (IHG). For each intervention, participants will perform two intensity modalities in randomised order: IMT (low vs high), IWS (low vs moderate), DLP (low vs high) and IHG (low vs moderate). The primary outcomes are the acute exercise-induced haemodynamic responses (esp. systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, stroke volume, cardiac output) across the different exercise training interventions, as well as the changes in haemodynamic responses during the recovery phase for each intervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in tissue oxygen saturation, oxygen saturation, and perceived dyspnoea and exertion. The study period is planned for 2025.

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the German Sport University Cologne (Ethical Approval Code: 209/24). The findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed publications. This study is supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation via the partnership with the Coordenacão de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)(CAPES-Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers) and by research funding from Edwards Lifesciences LLC (Limited Liability Company).

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00035668.

The aim of this study is to identify and analyse research priorities across the osteopathic profession internationally, to determine how different interested parties conceptualise research importance and to examine how contextual factors influence research prioritisation.

A mixed methods sequential exploratory design combining an umbrella review, a thematic analysis, an expert consensus agreement and an international cross-sectional survey was used to define, validate and evaluate research priorities.

An international online survey, available in nine languages, was distributed through professional osteopathic organisations and network worldwide, a patient representative organisation and social media.

2229 respondents including patients (7.4%), practitioners (42.1%), students (17.4%), educators (13.5%), researchers (5.0%) and policy makers (4.3%) from across 42 countries.

Primary outcomes were interested party’s conceptualisation of research importance and validation of the priorities in Research for Osteopathic Care (PROCare) framework. Secondary outcomes included current research priorities across interested parties groups and influence of contextual factors on prioritisation.

Three distinct approaches to priority-setting emerged: conservative (42.9%), sceptic (20.2%) and enthusiast (36.9%). Organising research priorities as a construct built from domains and subdomains was shown to be internally valid (Cronbach’s α=0.911). ‘Patient safety’ (nominated by 82% of relevant countries) and ‘physical activities and mobility’ (51.0%) were the most prioritised subdomains. ‘Digital health’ ranked lowest (28th of 28 subdomains). Significant geographic variations were observed mainly for the overall importance to most research domains. Strong consensus emerged around core priorities including patient safety, physical activity promotion and understanding treatment mechanisms.

The PROCare framework provides a validated structure for evaluating osteopathic research priorities across diverse interested parties. While geographic variations exist in priority emphasis, fundamental agreement on key research domains suggests potential for internationally coordinated research strategies. Future work should focus on developing mechanisms to ensure balanced representation of conservative, sceptic and enthusiast perspectives in research planning.

Multimorbidity contributes significantly to poor population health outcomes while straining healthcare systems. Although some multimorbid patients experience an accelerated health decline (a decline in well-being or functional status that cannot be attributed to the natural ageing-related health deterioration), others can remain stable for years. Identifying risk factors for accelerated health decline in persons with multimorbidity could help prevent complications and reduce unnecessary interventions. Our review, therefore, aims to map the evidence on the clinical, biographical and healthcare-related factors associated with an accelerated health decline in multimorbid individuals.

We will use the evidence-mapping review methodology. We will perform a systematic comprehensive literature search in Medline via Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar using two broad concepts: ‘multimorbidity’ and ‘longitudinal studies’. We will search with MeSH terms (eg, ‘Multimorbidity’ (Majr), ‘Longitudinal Studies’ (Majr)) and free text words (eg, multimorbidity, multiple chronic condition*, longitudinal), from inception to date of the final search. All original quantitative studies involving participants in primary care and related healthcare settings will be included. Abstract/titles and full-text screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two or more researchers to minimise selection and reporting bias, with conflicts resolved by consensus. The data will be analysed qualitatively, and topics will be extracted to create evidence clusters. Risk factors will be classified in groups and cross-referenced against the outcomes from respective studies into combinations of exposure-outcome clusters. The resulting evidence clusters will be described narratively and presented as bubble plots. The search, initiated in January 2023, will be updated following this protocol review to reflect the most current evidence; exact dates will be reported in the results manuscript.

Due to the nature of the proposed evidence map, ethics approval will not be required. Results from our research will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at local, national and international conferences.

https://osf.io/q72xa/

Combined vascular endothelial growth factor/programmed death-ligand 1 blockade through atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) is the current standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A/B substantially improved objective response rates compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib; however, a majority of patients will still not respond to A/B. Strong scientific rationale and emerging clinical data suggest that faecal microbiota transfer (FMT) may improve antitumour immune response on PD-(L)1 blockade. Early trials in melanoma with FMT and reinduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICI) therapy in patients with anti-PD-1-refractory metastatic melanoma were reported in 2021 and demonstrated reinstatement of response to ICI therapy in many patients. Due to anatomical vicinity and the physiological relevance of the gut-liver axis, we hypothesise HCC to be a particularly attractive cancer entity to further assess a potential benefit of FMT in combination with ICI towards increased antitumour immunity. Additionally, HCC often occurs in patients with liver cirrhosis, where liver function is prognostically relevant. There is evidence that FMT may increase hepatic function and therefore could positively affect outcome in this patient population.

This prospective, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial has been designed to assess immunogenicity and safety of FMT via INTESTIFIX 001 combined with A/B in advanced HCC in comparison to A/B with placebo. Primary endpoints are measured as tumour CD8+ T cell infiltration after 2 cycles of treatment with vancomycin, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001 in comparison to vancomycin-placebo, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001-placebo and safety of the therapeutic combination in advanced HCC. INTESTIFIX 001 is an encapsulated FMT preparation by healthy donors with a high alpha-diversity in their gut microbiome for oral administration, manufactured by the Cologne Microbiota Bank (CMB). Sample size was calculated to achieve a specific expected accuracy for the primary immunological endpoint. 48 subjects will be randomised to reach a goal of 42 usable measurements in the modified intention-to-treat set. Subjects will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to A/B or placebo (28 A/B, 14 placebo).

The study was approved by ethics committee review and the German Federal Ministry of Drugs and Medical Devices. The trial is registered under EU CT no. 2023-506887-15-00. The outcome of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and at international conferences.

NCT05690048.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) show promise in bridging mental healthcare gaps. However, treatment selection often relies on availability and trial-and-error, prolonging suffering and increasing costs. Personalised prediction models could help identify individuals benefiting most from specific DTx.

The aim of this secondary analysis was to establish a machine learning-based prediction model for positive treatment outcomes in patients with depressive or anxiety symptoms after 8 weeks of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT).

We analysed a large real-world dataset of patients from the online therapy unit iCBT programme in Saskatchewan, Canada (2013–2021). Clinically significant changes in depressive symptoms or anxiety were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). We trained six prediction models using sociodemographic and mental health-related factors at baseline, compared model performances and calculated Shapley values for feature importance.

Data from 4175 patients using 34 features for prediction, identified by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, showed the Gradient Boosted Model (gbm) and logistic regression (log) performed best, with balanced accuracies of 0.76, 95% CI (0.70 to 0.83) and 0.70, 95% CI (0.63 to 0.77). Shapley values indicated GAD-7 scores at baseline as the most important predictor of clinically significant improvement, along with mental health history and sociodemographic variables.

The gbm and log models achieved comparable accuracy in predicting clinically significant improvement after iCBT, supporting the use of simpler, interpretable methods in clinical practice.

These findings could help improve mental health treatment selection, iCBT assignment, enhance effectiveness and optimise treatment for patients.

NCT05758285.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and depressive symptoms (DS) are highly prevalent, burdensome, costly and comorbid health conditions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) was shown to improve pain and disability in patients with CLBP; however, the effect on comorbid DS remains less certain. Interestingly, CLBP and DS seem to be associated with changes in interoception, which may be reversed by OMT.

The study protocol proposes a single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of OMT on clinical symptoms (depression, pain and disability) and interoceptive functions (interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS. A sample of 60 adult subjects with CLBP and comorbid DS shall be recruited from osteopathic, orthopaedic and physiotherapeutic practices and educational institutes for osteopathy, sports science, psychology and medicine in Hamburg, Germany. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive six 45 min treatment sessions of either OMT (standard-OMT group) or sham treatment imitating OMT (sham-OMT group). Primarily, symptoms of depression, pain and disability will be assessed with the Beck’s Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondarily, interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness will be evaluated using the Heartbeat Tracking Task (HTT), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) and confidence-accuracy correspondence (CAC). Ancillary, the therapeutic alliance will be investigated with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire. Data will be collected at baseline (t₀), the first, third and sixth treatment sessions (t₁, t₃, t₆) and at 3 months follow-up (t₇). The findings will be analysed for between-group differences using descriptive (mean and SD) and inductive statistics (mixed analysis of variance). It is hypothesised that standard-OMT, compared with sham-OMT, will reduce depression, pain and disability (BDI-II, NRS, ODI) and increase interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness (HTT, MAIA-2, CAC) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS.

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical School Hamburg (MSH-2023/288). The anonymised dataset will be published in an online repository, and the results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

DRKS00031694.

The recent pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 had a profound global impact. While many individuals recovered from COVID-19, some developed long-lasting symptoms that significantly disrupted daily life. The WHO defines this condition as post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). Common symptoms include fatigue, dyspnoea, sleep disturbances and cognitive difficulties. Increasing evidence suggests that PCC is a multifactorial condition, shaped not only by biomedical but also psychological and social factors. This article presents the protocol of the Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS), which aims to improve understanding of PCC by capturing clinical, functional and psychosocial aspects through repeated assessments over the course of 1 year.

BALCoS is a prospective, single-site cohort study. Inclusion criteria include either a probable or confirmed history of SARS-CoV-2 infection with persistent symptoms consistent with the WHO definition of PCC, sufficient German language skills and age ≥18 years. At baseline, we collected detailed information on previous SARS-CoV-2 infections, symptom history, reinfections, COVID-19 vaccination status and pre-existing medical conditions. The study includes standardised psychometric assessments, physical performance tests, ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), neurocognitive testing and blood sample collection. Assessments are scheduled at baseline and at 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. All participants complete psychometric assessments at each time point. Blood samples are only collected at baseline. Neurocognitive testing and physical performance measures are collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up for in-person participants only. Participants who are unable to attend in person complete a remote version of the study, excluding these in-clinic assessments. EMAs are initiated the day after each time point and consist of eight questions over 10 consecutive days. The study is exploratory in nature, with a target sample size of 120 participants. BALCoS is part of the Horizon Europe Long COVID project, a multinational interdisciplinary research consortium integrating mechanistic, clinical and interventional studies.

The study was approved by the Ethics Commission of Northwest and Central Switzerland (BASEC-ID: 2023–00359) and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05781893). All participants provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

NCT05781893.

Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 20.01 CHEST-RT (Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Extensive Stage Small cell with Thoracic Radiotherapy) is a single-arm, open-label, prospective, multicentre phase II trial study that aims to establish the safety, feasibility and describe the efficacy of incorporating thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) (concurrent or sequential) to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

A single arm of up to 30 evaluable participants given TRT concurrent or sequentially with chemoimmunotherapy will be enrolled. Participants should commence radiotherapy with cycle 3 or cycle 4 of chemotherapy. Those not suitable for concurrent radiotherapy due to large tumour volumes may receive sequential radiotherapy. Accounting for a 15% non-evaluable rate, up to 35 participants will be enrolled. An independent data and safety monitoring committee will review the data and assess safety and feasibility. Progression to a phase III trial would be considered feasible if ≤20% of participants experienced ≥grade 3 oesophageal toxicity and ≤10% experienced ≥grade 3 pneumonitis. This approach would be considered feasible if there is ≤20% treatment discontinuation of systemic therapy secondary to radiation toxicities and ≥75% of participants have tumour volumes that can be safely treated to a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary outcome of the trial is safety and feasibility, and survival and responses will be assessed as secondary endpoints. A predefined subgroup analysis of toxicity will be performed on group 1 (concurrent TRT) versus group 2 participants (consolidation TRT).

This study was approved by the Peter MacCallum Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/73189/PMCC-2021). The protocol, technical and clinical data will be disseminated by conference presentations and publications. Any modifications to the protocol will be formally documented by administrative letters and will be submitted to the approving HREC for review and approval.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000586819) and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT05796089).

To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation.

Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation.

Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark.

1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month.

Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising).

Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0–10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0–100).

1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by –0.74 (95% CI –0.90; –0.58) and –1.02 (95% CI –1.22; –0.83) points on the NRS at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by –2.65 (95% CI –3.51; –1.78) and –4.48 (95% CI –5.59; –3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p

Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.