Community pharmacies are increasingly recognised as accessible providers of public health services. Integrating cardiovascular health checks and behaviour change strategies with the community pharmacy vaccination service has the potential to improve population health outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify potential pharmacist-led cardiovascular-related services suitable for such integration, and to explore the acceptability and feasibility of pharmacy-led services among both service users and providers.

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were systematically searched for UK-based empirical studies published between January 2013 and December 2024.

Primary studies reporting on pharmacist-led cardiovascular-related interventions (eg, blood pressure monitoring, cholesterol screening, smoking cessation) delivered to adults (≥18 years) in community pharmacy settings and reporting on clinical outcomes, feasibility or acceptability were included.

Data were extracted using a standardised form on Excel and synthesised narratively. Key domains of interest included intervention characteristics, facilitators, barriers, perceived outcomes, delivery mode and intervention content including behavioural change strategies or components to support implementation.

Of 8322 records screened, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular-related interventions were broadly feasible and acceptable to both patients and pharmacy staff. High patient satisfaction was attributed to the accessibility and convenience of pharmacy locations, as well as the ability of pharmacy staff to establish rapport during interactions. Facilitators of service delivery included private consultation spaces, structured training and access to digital screening tools (eg, devices for atrial fibrillation detection). Barriers included workload constraints and limited public awareness of pharmacy services. Five studies described successful integration of lifestyle interventions within pharmacy-based settings, but the long-term clinical outcomes produced by the intervention were rarely reported. Patients valued the convenience and trusted relationships with pharmacists, though concerns about privacy were raised. Pharmacists reported the need for clearer clinical protocols, and multidisciplinary support and training to improve their confidence in delivering health checks as part of their routine work.

Community pharmacies offer an optimal setting for integrating cardiovascular-related screening interventions with the vaccination service delivered within community pharmacy. Successful implementation will require attention to the identified facilitators including the quality of staff training, competing priorities and optimisation and utilisation of pharmacy space. Future research should prioritise definitive controlled trials and cost-effectiveness analyses to assess long-term health outcomes. Policy action is also needed to support service integration and expand pharmacists’ public health roles within the wider National Health Service.

While almost half of older adults admitted to hospital are prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines, less than 1% have a medicine proactively deprescribed during admission in the UK. The CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) intervention is designed to address geriatricians’ and pharmacists’ barriers and enablers to deprescribing. The CHARMER definitive trial will evaluate effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety.

A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 20 hospitals in England, with four hospitals in reserve. All hospitals will collect baseline data. Every 3 months, five hospitals will be randomised to receive the intervention. The intervention, implemented by a local project manager, comprises a hospital action plan to set deprescribing as an organisational goal; workshops for pharmacists and geriatricians to change beliefs about deprescribing; weekly briefings between geriatricians and pharmacists to discuss opportunities for deprescribing; benchmarking reports to compare deprescribing performance across participating hospitals. With an average of 200 patients admitted and discharged during each step, the study will have 89.5% power at 5% significance level and intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.05 to detect a 3% difference in 90-day re-admission rate from 16.7% versus 13.7%. Anonymised routinely collected data, including readmissions, will be obtained for all patients admitted during the study period. Enhanced data collection periods of 1 month during control and intervention periods will be used to recruit patients and data for secondary outcomes and process evaluation.

A stepped-wedge design enabled a smaller number of hospitals and patients to be included than a traditional cluster-randomised design. The complexity of intervention implementation necessitated a project manager in addition to the principal investigator responsible for trial conduct. Using routinely collected data for the primary outcome measure should ensure that the trial has sufficient power on completion. Planned enhanced data collection for short periods of time improves trial efficiency.

ISRCTN13248281.

To identify barriers and facilitators to implementing an electronic shared decision-making tool for managing anticoagulant-related drug-drug interactions that affect bleeding risk in routine clinical care.

Preimplementation qualitative study using semistructured interviews.

Three academic medical centres in the southeastern and western USA. Interviews were conducted between 27 March and 25 September 2024.

36 participants, including 19 clinicians involved in prescribing or managing anticoagulants and seventeen patients prescribed anticoagulants, were recruited using purposive and convenience sampling.

Participants identified multiple barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Common barriers included limited visit time, challenges integrating the tool into existing workflows, role and scope-of-practice constraints, and variation in patient digital literacy. Facilitators included clear visualisation of bleeding risk, access to supporting evidence, familiar interface design and perceived potential to support patient engagement and shared decision-making. Several determinants functioned as both barriers and facilitators, depending on clinical context and user role.

This preimplementation qualitative study identified context-specific determinants that influence the adoption of an electronic shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions. Findings highlight the importance of early attention to workflow integration, role alignment and usability to support uptake in routine care. Addressing these factors during design and implementation may inform strategies to support adoption and future evaluation in real-world clinical settings.

To identify and prioritise research uncertainties regarding the assessment, management and rehabilitation of patients with problematic hip replacements through a national Priority Setting Partnership (PSP).

A national PSP using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology.

UK.

Patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the care of patients with problematic hip replacements.

A steering group was established. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed throughout. A nationwide survey was conducted to collect unanswered questions. These were refined, prioritised through an interim survey and ranked at a final consensus workshop.

The initial survey yielded 201 questions, refined to 32. The interim survey had 191 respondents, leading to 19 questions at the final workshop. The top 10 research priorities were agreed on.

This PSP identified key research priorities for problematic hip replacements, focusing on diagnosis, pain management, perioperative optimisation and infection. These priorities can inform researchers and funders to improve outcomes for affected patients.

Risk reduction training for UK care home staff is limited, not standardised and challenging to implement. Virtual reality (VR) is an immersive, engaging method of education delivery that is being adopted in health and social care. VR may be an effective education tool in care homes, but this research has yet to be conducted.

The VR-CARE project aims to create a new VR risk reduction training programme for care homes that combines hand hygiene and falls prevention modules, and to evaluate this through a pilot trial to inform a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).

There are two research phases with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities embedded throughout. Care home stakeholders are collaborating to design the training and toolkit, oversee methods, review resources for accessibility, support recruitment and ensure the project meets the needs of the workforce and positively impacts resident care.

In phase 1, we will use a mixed-methods and user-centred design approach to develop the VR training and an accompanying implementation toolkit needed to deliver it. The training will be developed and tested by 15 care home staff across three rounds to identify and inform changes that maximise usability and acceptability. We will conduct up to 20 interviews with staff from VR companies and care homes to support toolkit development.

Phase 2 is a mixed-methods pilot cluster RCT, with a waitlist control and process evaluation with up to 80 unregistered staff members from six North England care homes, to develop the measures and methods to inform a future trial. The process evaluation will generate knowledge about VR as a training mechanism in care homes. This phase will focus on the practicality of using VR, broader impacts (eg, on residents), contextual considerations and how it might be scaled up.

The University of Manchester Proportionate University Research Ethics Committee has approved phase 1 (Reference: 2025-24416-44642). We will obtain further approval before commencing phase 2.

Outputs will include user-friendly and acceptable VR risk reduction training for care homes, accompanied by an implementation toolkit adaptable for other VR training in social care settings. Materials (eg, training overviews, infographics and videos) will be developed to support uptake. Findings will be presented at conferences and published in journals. Lay summaries will be co-created with our PPIE group, and additional dissemination methods will be co-developed to broaden reach.

A significant proportion of infants born at ≤29+6 weeks’ gestation develop lung disease during the neonatal period, thus putting them at risk of developing prematurity-associated lung disease in childhood and adulthood. After discharge from the neonatal unit, pre-existing lung disease in preterm-born infants is exacerbated by (often frequent) respiratory viral infections requiring greater health utilisation, including hospital admissions, than their term-born equivalents. Opportunities to prevent viral infections in infancy are largely limited to anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibody prophylaxis and recently maternal RSV immunisation, but in term-born infants, trained immunity-based vaccines such as Bactek (MV130, Inmunotek, Spain) are increasingly used. Bactek provides a promising therapeutic avenue for preterm-born infants to target postdischarge respiratory viral infection in this vulnerable group of infants. The BALLOON study aims to assess this treatment in a very/extremely preterm-born population and determine if treatment with the trained immunity-based vaccine Bactek decreases the risk of unscheduled visits to healthcare professionals for lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with placebo. Included infants are born at ≤29+6 weeks’ gestation and treated daily from term-equivalent (37–43 weeks’ postmenstrual age, PMA) or from discharge, if earlier, up to 1 year of corrected age.

542 infants are being recruited prior to discharge by neonatal units in the UK. They are being randomised to receive Bactek or placebo, once daily dose of 2 sprays (each 0.1 mL) of IMP (300 Formazin Turbidity Units), from 37 to 43 weeks’ PMA or discharge if earlier up to 1 year of corrected age. The primary objective is to assess if sublingual Bactek spray decreases the risk of health professional diagnosed lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (unscheduled visits to general practitioners, accident and emergency departments and hospital admissions) between enrolment and 1 year of corrected age. Secondary outcomes include the number of parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visits for LRTIs, the time to first parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visit for LRTI, parent-reported wheeze episodes (identification aided by WheezeScan (Omron, Japan)), parent-reported use of respiratory medications, growth (weight, length and head circumference), parent(s)/guardian(s) reported time missed from work and/or nursery time missed for the infant and volume of adverse reactions. Viruses associated with LRTIs will also be identified.

Ethics permission has been granted by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (Ref 24/WA/0181), and regulatory permission by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (CTA reference 21323/0063/001-0004). The study is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN14019493). Findings will be disseminated via national and international peer-reviewed journals, and conferences. Oversight of the study is being provided by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee and an independent Trial Steering Committee (TSC). The Trial Management Group (TMG) meets every month.

ISRCTN14019493.

Clinical research in emergency and critical care is vital, but recruitment and consent are complex. Research may be conducted without prior consent when patients are critically ill, and interventions are time critical. Some patients may die before research participation can be discussed with relatives, leaving the bereaved unaware of their involvement. This study explored potential communication strategies for informing bereaved relatives when a patient has died following enrolment into an emergency or critical care study without prior consent.

A mixed-methods study using a telephone survey and semi-structured interviews conducted simultaneously. The survey was conducted within a National Health Service Trust in North West England with relatives of deceased study participants. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with bereaved relatives and research and clinical staff across the UK, and medical examiner (ME)/ME officers based in England and Wales. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Data were synthesised using a constant comparison approach.

11 bereaved relatives completed the survey. 53 individuals (21 research and clinical staff, 18 relatives and 14 MEs/officers) participated in semi-structured interviews.

Although many trials do not include a process for notifying bereaved relatives about research participation, most relatives valued the opportunity to learn about their family member’s participation, emphasising the importance of transparency and trust. However, some raised concerns over the potential burden of automatic disclosure by the ME service. Offering bereaved relatives the option to receive sensitively worded information about research involvement at an appropriate time, soon after death, was recommended.

Bereaved relatives should have the choice to be informed about research participation without prior consent. Our findings support the need for transparent and sensitive communication and will contribute to future guidance for the design and conduct of adult emergency and critical care studies.

Sympathetic activation is the hallmark of cardiac disease, driving disease progression and triggering ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Despite optimal medical therapy, many patients experience recurrent VAs refractory to medical therapy, leading to repetitive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, worse quality of life and adverse outcomes. Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) through surgical removal of the stellate ganglia is an effective treatment for refractory VAs but carries a high complication rate. We hypothesise that high precision image guided radiotherapy can be used to target the stellate ganglia to achieve CSD non-invasively.

RADIO-STAR (hypofractionated radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia for ventricular arrhythmia) is a first-in-human, phase 1 safety and dose finding study of radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia in patients with recurrent VAs. Patients with structural heart disease requiring recurrent ICD therapy for VAs are invited to undergo radiotherapy bilaterally to their stellate ganglia with a predetermined sample size of n=13. Radiotherapy dose will be determined by a prespecified dose escalation protocol. The primary outcome is safety defined as any treatment-related grade 3–5 toxicity occurring within 6 months of radiotherapy treatment, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or any treatment-related side effects detected on patient symptom questionnaires and clinical examination during study visits. Secondary outcome measures to evaluate feasibility and efficacy include ability to safely deliver radiotherapy and consequent changes in circulating catecholamines and neuropeptide-Y, heart rate variability, structural changes in the stellate ganglia on MRI imaging and ICD therapy burden.

This study has received ethical approval by the South Central—Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (REC/SC/0005). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and/or international scientific conferences.

ISRCTN49861434.

Increased risks and concerns regarding patient safety in early-phase studies exist because knowledge about the new intervention is still accumulating. This means that narrow eligibility criteria are needed. However, if early-phase studies are narrow in their inclusion, for example, by not including diverse populations, there is a potential risk that new therapies have insufficient relevant efficacy and safety data. Existing research has explored equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) factors in early-phase pharmaceutical studies, but it has not been possible to find studies that have systematically examined whether EDI factors have been considered in surgical studies reporting innovative procedures. We aim to examine how EDI factors are considered in early-phase surgical studies and surgical innovation reports to explore how this may impact on later-phase evaluation and inclusive intervention implementation.

A scoping review following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step process is being conducted. We will search Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for surgical early-phase studies. A two-step screening process for eligibility is being used. Independent double screening will take place for 20% of the papers. Eligible articles will report early evaluation of an innovative surgical/invasive procedure. Excluded will be comparative and later-phase studies and early evaluations of pharmaceutical products even in a surgical setting. Data on article details, patient eligibility and whether protected characteristics are reported and considered will be extracted. Information about EDI considerations reported in the introduction or discussion of the papers will also be extracted. Findings will be discussed with a patient advisory group. A content synthesis approach will be undertaken and descriptive summaries presented.

This study does not require ethical approval being a secondary analysis. The findings will be disseminated through academic journal publications and oral presentations.

This process evaluation explores patient and healthcare professional acceptability of community-based monitoring versus hospital-based care for patients with quiescent neovascular age-related macular degeneration (QnAMD).

Qualitative process evaluation was conducted as part of a randomised controlled trial.

Six hospitals and six community-based practices.

25 patients and 16 healthcare professionals (ophthalmologists and optometrists). This approach helped differentiate between common issues and those specific to community-based monitoring.

The Quality-Assured Follow-Up of QnAMD by non-medical practitioners trial aimed to examine whether non-medical practitioners follow-up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe and clinically and cost-effective way. The process evaluation aimed to examine whether the intervention was acceptable by patients and professionals. The process evaluation was based on interviews which contained open-ended questions focused on patient experience and confidence in community-based care, issues concerning the practicalities of the organisation and management of the clinic, and resources including IT and digital equipment. The theory of acceptability framework was used to interpret the findings.

Patients reported positively on the experience of receiving QnAMD services in the community and highlighted staff professionalism and clear communication. Key themes were the proximity of care provision for patients, IT interoperability and the real-world costs of running the service. Some patients randomised to the hospital showed preference for the intervention to take place in the hospital, mediated mainly by prior experience of hospital care and travel distance. The location of the clinic and transport routes affected the experience of attending appointments, with strong preference expressed for proximity to one’s home. Inaccessibility due to non-modifiable internal building structures in the community and parking in hospital eye services was reported by a small proportion of patients. Healthcare professionals reported positively about their ability to deliver QnAMD services in community settings but raised concerns about the compatibility of technological infrastructure that facilitates the sharing of optical coherence tomography image and video files. Some optometrists were also concerned about the financial sustainability of the intervention after the end of the trial due to the costs involved in the administration of QnAMD follow-up care.

The delivery of QnAMD services in the community by non-medical personnel was broadly accepted by both patients and practitioners. This implies that non-medical practitioners can follow up patients with QnAMD in the community in a safe way. Further research would be needed to establish whether similar results would be obtained during routine practice outside a research project and whether the long-term follow-up for QnAMD would be financially sustainable for independent as well as chain community optometry practices.

NCT03893474.

Significant advances in systemic therapy have improved survival for patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the present treatment strategies and dose-fractionation for high-dose palliative radiotherapy (RT) are based on trials from the 1990s, when RT planning was simple with less precise delivery. Contemporary lung RT uses 4D-CT, volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy, aided by online verification using cone beam CT, which enables greater accuracy and better target volume coverage, while reducing doses to normal organs at risk. The Shortened High-dose Palliative Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of reducing the number of RT fractions and RT duration, using contemporary planning, verification and delivery techniques.

This single-arm, multicentre, phase-II study will test the shortened hypofractionated accelerated palliative RT regimen of 30 Gy in 6 alternate-day fractions, with strict normal tissue dose constraints. We aim to recruit 37 patients across 4 sites within the West Midlands. Quality assurance for the RT is supported by the Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA). Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who are candidates for high-dose palliative RT, before or after first-line systemic therapy, are eligible for recruitment. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of the proposed dose-fractionation. Secondary objectives include evaluating toxicity profiles, patient-reported outcome measures, time to progression, feasibility and the National Health Service cost-saving.

This study is conducted in accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) guidelines and all applicable regulatory frameworks, including, but not limited to, the UK policy framework for health and social care research, as well as the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales regulations. Approval for the study was granted on 18 April 2024 (IRAS project ID: 332998; REC reference: 24/WM/0032). The chief investigator is responsible for obtaining informed consent from participants. Any individual delegated this responsibility is thoroughly authorised, trained and competent to conduct the informed consent process. On completion of the trial, the results will be shared with participants in a plain language summary and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. If successful, this study will inform a phase III randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy. For updates on the study, visit the study web page (https://research.mededcoventry.org/About-Us/Meet-The-Team/TMU/Ship-Rt).

NCT06483308.

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is a diagnostic term that describes the neurodevelopmental and physical effects resulting from prenatal exposure to alcohol. Individuals living with FASD can experience lifelong challenges, yet with a diagnosis and sufficient support for the individual and their whānau (families), people can live fulfilling lives. Currently, little is known of the prevalence and impact in Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ). Our aim is to identify the prevalence and understand the needs of young people living with FASD and other neurodevelopmental disorders in Youth Justice (YJ) residences in Aotearoa, NZ. One study will investigate the prevalence of FASD in this setting. The outcomes of both studies may demonstrate barriers and enablers, as well as strengths and gaps in YJ services of Aotearoa, NZ. The outcomes of both studies may guide reinforcing of current best practices as well as highlight necessary and novel initiatives together providing best support for the children and adolescents and their whānau as well as staff across YJ residences.

Extensive consultation with Māori and Pacific Advisory groups, researchers and experts in FASD and justice settings, individuals living with FASD and YJ staff together informed the development of this study.

Children and adolescents (hereafter young people) aged 10 to 18 years and currently residing in YJ residences are eligible for participation and assessment for FASD through assenting and consenting to provide personal and social histories and completed physical and neuropsychological assessments. The comprehensive FASD histories, screening and assessment will be conducted by a neuropsychologist and paediatrician employing standardised assessment practices and instruments. The team will also collect information from health, education and care and protection records; from the young people themselves; and from their family and staff. The study will reference Whakakotahitanga, the newly released (2024) guidelines for screening and diagnosing FASD in Aotearoa, NZ while also acknowledging the differences imposed under constraints of funding research including, for example, time and money. An individualised report will be prepared for each young person and their whānau. Study data will be analysed with descriptive statistics as appropriate. Our findings will be considered by the Māori and Pasifika advisory groups for framing and culturally secure translation, disseminated with all participating young people, translated to YJ services and staff, government and community neurodiversity sectors. Outcomes will be made available through community hubs, conferences, reports and peer-reviewed journal publications.

The study has received ethical approval from the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee (2024 Full 20065). Locality ethical approval has been granted from Oranga Tamariki (Ministry of Children), and a privacy impact evaluation has been undertaken. The findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publication, local and national conferences and with key agencies including Oranga Tamariki.

Enteric fever, primarily caused by Salmonella enterica Typhi and Salmonella enterica Paratyphi A (SPA), is endemic mainly in South Asia, disproportionately affecting school-age children. Although typhoid conjugate vaccines (TCVs) are effective and implemented in many countries, no licensed vaccine exists against paratyphoid A. Bivalent vaccines targeting both S. Typhi and SPA may address this gap. Although field efficacy trials are not considered feasible, controlled human infection models (CHIMs) offer an alternative pathway for evaluating vaccine efficacy. This will be the first efficacy study of a bivalent vaccine against typhoid and paratyphoid A using a paratyphoid CHIM.

This is a phase II multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy and immunogenicity of a bivalent conjugate vaccine candidate, Serum Institute of India Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (Bivalent) (SII-TCV(B)), against SPA using a CHIM in healthy UK adults aged 18–55 years. A total of 192 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either SII-TCV(B) or a licensed Vi-polysaccharide typhoid vaccine (Vi-PS). All participants will be orally challenged with S. Paratyphi A (strain NVGH308) 28 days postvaccination. Participants will be monitored closely for 14 days and treated at 14 days postchallenge or promptly on diagnosis, according to prespecified criteria. The primary objective is to evaluate vaccine efficacy of SII-TCV(B) against paratyphoid infection using a CHIM. The coprimary immunogenicity objective is to assess non-inferiority of the typhoid IgG response compared with a licensed Vi-PS control.

The study has received ethical approval from the Berkshire Research Ethics Committee (24/SC/0309) and regulatory approval from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and scientific meetings.

ISRCTN65855590.

Earlier heart failure (HF) diagnosis in the community could allow timely treatment initiation and prevent unnecessary hospitalisation, but identifying those at risk remains challenging. We aimed to summarise the performance of risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF.

Systematic review of multivariable incident HF risk prediction models in the community setting.

MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to 9 November 2023.

Observational, community-based studies reporting prediction model performance for incident HF within a 5-year time horizon.

Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Where possible, C-statistics (or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) with 95% CIs were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool and certainty of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

Eighteen studies described 45 prediction models, 27 used traditional statistical methods and 18 applied machine learning. Most (39/45) demonstrated acceptable discrimination (C-statistic >0.70). Overall, C-statistics ranged from 0.675 to 0.954, typically with narrow 95% CIs. External validation was performed for 31 models, but only two—the modified PCP-HF models for white men and women—were validated in three cohorts, the highest among all the models. Exploratory random-effects meta-analysis of these models showed pooled C-statistics of 0.82 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.82) for men and 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88) for women, indicating excellent discrimination but more heterogenous performance among women. Model performance was at high risk of bias due to unreported or inappropriate handling of missing data, and the certainty of evidence was very low.

Risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF in the community performed well, but were at high risk of bias and lacked external validation. Future model development requires appropriate data sources, robust handling of missing data, external validation and clinical testing to assess their impact on earlier HF diagnosis and outcomes.

CRD42022347120.

To report on the development and refinement of a questionnaire of personal recovery for use by older adults with bipolar disorder.

An integrated knowledge translation approach was used to structure collaboration of individuals with clinical, research and service users. Focus groups, online meetings and online feedback were used to support information sharing.

Knowledge users from across the UK including older adults with experience of bipolar, clinicians and academics.

A final draft of the Bipolar Recovery Questionnaire for Older Adults with bipolar (BRQ-OA).

Five service users and 15 stakeholders engaged with the study. The views and recommendations of the groups were integrated into the development of the BRQ-OA across four phases. Service users identified factors of personal recovery they felt had changed with ageing, including the impact of physical health and the importance of finding a purpose following changes to role. Collaboration with key stakeholders allowed for the development of a personal recovery questionnaire relevant to the experiences of older adults.

An integrated knowledge translation approach successfully structured engagement with key stakeholders to allow for active and meaningful engagement. Collaboration of individuals with experience of bipolar, clinicians and academics allowed for the development of the first questionnaire of personal recovery specifically adapted for older adults with bipolar. Future research is needed to validate the BRQ-OA in older adult samples so that it can be used in mental health services and intervention studies.

Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.

A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.

Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.

A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4–6 months after amputation. A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.

Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients’ limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals’ perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons’ paternalism and (v) patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.

Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences. Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation. Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.

NCT04903756.