The length of hospital stay for patients with physical illnesses is longer for those with mental health comorbidity, particularly in the presence of severe physical multimorbidity. Integrating psychosocial risk screening at hospital admission, with a subsequent care pathway, could address psychosomatic and social care needs early and reduce length of stay. However, implementation may be hindered by organisational factors such as increased staff workload and timely integration into existing processes. In addition, patient factors such as low acceptance of screening and follow-up may affect uptake. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing this integrated approach to screening and follow-up in preparation for a confirmatory trial.

The present study is a single centre, randomised feasibility study conducted on a pilot ward. Patients will be enrolled and assigned to the intervention or the control group. Only the intervention group will receive tablet-based psychosocial risk screening conducted by ward physicians or medical students in their practical year. If the psychosomatic screening is positive and the patient agrees, he or she is referred to the psychosomatic consultation service. If the social service screening is positive, the patient will be seen by a social worker. The main objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-sized confirmatory trial. An informed consent rate of 30% of eligible patients is set as the feasibility criterion. A study period of 4 months is planned for the feasibility study. The feasibility study will be analysed using descriptive statistics.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University (S-301/2024) on 24 May 2024. The results of this feasibility study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06651164.

Persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders are conditions requiring a biopsychosocial approach to care, often from multiple professionals. The fragmentation of care common in most health systems results in unsatisfactory and challenging care experiences. Collaborative care networks form an important route towards improving outcomes and the overall experience of care for patients and professionals. While we have a good idea of what such collaborative care networks can look like, we lack knowledge on the practicalities of implementing change in such networks.

The core objective of this study is to implement change in a collaborative care network for persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders care. Our questions were twofold: first, what are examples of realistic action processes to improve such collaborative care networks? Second, what are, in our experience, conditions for an effective change process in such a collaborative care network?

Participatory action research approach embedded within an active regional network between May 2023 and May 2024. The process was led by an action group who selected objectives and related actions with the aim of improving the network, leading to better care for people with persistent somatic symptoms and functional disorders as well as improving satisfaction among professionals.

ALK Netwerk Salland, a regional network of professionals and experts-by-experience, focused on care of persistent somatic symptoms. This network is based in the Salland region in the east of the Netherlands, centred around the city of Deventer.

The action group was made up of local stakeholders including experts-by-experience and health and social care professionals, facilitated by a researcher-in-residence. Other participants included members of the regional network who provided input towards the different objectives.

Over the course of a year, three objectives were selected and enacted, including assessing the resources of the network, improving knowledge of treatment options and improving the shared vision of care. The process faced some challenges, such as changes in action group members and a lack of resources and time to enact changes. However, by having a trusted and engaged team, working with an active network, we were able to enact significant changes to the network, which may be sustained and built on through the ongoing action group.

Future participatory action research studies would benefit from a trusted and embedded researcher-in-residence, meaningful involvement early in the process of experts-by-experience, and serious consideration of realistic outcome measures to monitor for evaluation of changes made.

To examine how menstruation, contraceptive use and gender-based violence intersect to shape the sexual and reproductive health and autonomy of girls and young women in Kenya.

Qualitative study exploring girls and young women’s experiences with contraceptive use and menstrual management, using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions analysed through a reflexive thematic approach.

Four county-run family planning clinics in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.

77 girls and young women aged 15–19 years (via 35 in-depth interviews and 7 focus group discussions) and 27 family planning clinic providers (via 5 focus group discussions).

Interviewees’ contributions suggest that covert contraceptive use, when discovered through menstrual monitoring, provoked intimate partner violence. Heavy menstrual bleeding, whether related to contraceptive use or not, was viewed as a sexual restriction and also fuelled intimate partner violence. Furthermore, the inability to afford sanitary pads, combined with the stigma surrounding menstruation, drove some girls and young women into exploitative sexual relationships, often resulting in unwanted or unintended pregnancies.

Menstrual bleeding and contraceptive use, both independently and in combination, affect girls and young women’s reproductive autonomy and overall health and well-being, particularly in relation to gender-based violence. Improving menstrual hygiene management, challenging the stigma and harmful norms tied to menstruation and contraception and ensuring safe contraceptive use are integral to improving sexual and reproductive health and autonomy and are requisite for preventing and eradicating gender-based violence.

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) strives to improve the healthcare system by focusing on value of care, that is, patient relevant outcomes relative to the costs for achieving these outcomes. Within VBHC, patient participation is crucial to identify patient relevant outcomes and value improvement potential. However, patient participation in VBHC initiatives remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to improve patient participation within VBHC teams with the ultimate aim to develop a practical guide for patient participation in VBHC.

An action research study.

This study was conducted in seven collaborating Dutch hospitals from March 2023 to November 2024.

Seven VBHC teams were selected to participate in the cyclical action research steps, that is, orientation, planning, implementation, and evaluation, in which patient participation was implemented or improved. These included the following patient groups: prostate cancer, vulnerable elderly, breast cancer, diabetes, maternity care, colorectal cancer and chronic kidney disease.

Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Qualitative data included observations and minutes of meetings with the intervention teams. Quantitative data included responses to the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) by multiple members of the intervention (n=7) and control teams (n=94) at three time points (T1=6 months, T2=12 months, T3=end of study). Qualitative data were thematically analysed and quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Finally, the data were triangulated to create an overview of lessons learnt in improving patient participation.

Patient participation goals varied across teams, leading to diverse actions, such as establishing a diabetes patient panel and distributing questionnaires to patients with colorectal cancer. PPEET results show that 71% of intervention team members reported that patient participation had an impact on the team’s outcomes compared with 44% in control teams (T3). Furthermore, 80% of the intervention team members initially wanted training in patient participation (T1), which dropped to 29% at T3. Overall, 22 lessons in improving patient participation in multidisciplinary project teams were identified and compiled into a practical guide.

The action research process improved the process and impact of patient participation in the intervention teams. Furthermore, the results indicate that the action research process enhanced the team members’ knowledge and skills on patient participation. The practical guide developed in this study can be used to support implementation of patient participation in VBHC.