Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has become one of the most prevalent occupational health problems1 and represents a major burden for individuals, employers1 2 and healthcare systems.1 The need to consider psychosocial factors such as stress and coping strategies is increasingly recognised...

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of hospitalisation in infants worldwide. New immunoprophylactic products, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and maternal vaccines, have demonstrated high efficacy in prelicensure clinical trials. Understanding how these interventions perform outside controlled trials, and how viral evolution or host factors influence protection, is essential for sustaining confidence in RSV prevention programmes.

We will conduct a 5-year, test-negative case–control study among infants ≤12 months of age who present with acute respiratory illness (ARI) within a large healthcare delivery network serving a demographically diverse population. Cases will be infants testing positive for RSV by PCR, and controls will be RSV-negative infants meeting the same ARI criteria. Data will be obtained from electronic health records, structured caregiver surveys and state immunization registries to ensure accurate classification of exposures and covariates. Vaccine effectiveness will be estimated using multivariable logistic regression controlling for potential confounding. RSV-positive specimens will undergo full-genome sequencing to identify variant lineages and potential immune-escape mutations. A subset of participants will provide acute and convalescent blood samples for single-cell immune profiling to define innate and adaptive responses associated with breakthrough infection.

The study protocol has been approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee (HIC #2000036550). Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents or legal guardians prior to participation. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings and public repositories, with fully de-identified participant data to protect privacy and confidentiality. Viral genomic data will be shared in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Policy, and analytical code will be made publicly available to ensure reproducibility.

NCT06172660.

Dyspnoea is an existentially burdensome symptom in patients with advanced and progressive diseases such as cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and advanced heart failure. Recent studies have highlighted that symptomatic treatment of dyspnoea is often ineffective and may depend on the underlying disease. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) has emerged as a ‘digital therapeutic’ for conditions such as pain, anxiety, and dyspnoea. Brain functional MRI (fMRI) offers the opportunity to identify distinct patterns of dyspnoea. Current findings are mainly limited to healthy volunteers, but clinical data from patients with life-limiting conditions are needed. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of identifying dyspnoea patterns in different life-limiting conditions using fMRI and IVR.

This is an observational monocentric feasibility study, conducted in a tertiary university centre. Healthy volunteers and patients diagnosed with advanced cancer, COPD, or heart failure and suffering from persistent dyspnoea will undergo an fMRI of the brain using IVR. The primary outcome of feasibility will be evaluated using descriptive statistics. Secondary outcomes include analysis of fMRI patterns of dyspnoea across populations, patient-reported burden of participation, and correlation between dyspnoea and psychological symptoms. These preliminary data will help determine the sample size required for a future study evaluating differences in dyspnoea patterns. Exploratory comparison between the characteristics of all four groups will be assessed with Fisher’s test (for proportions) and either independent Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, depending on distribution. Correlations between variables will be tested using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis will be performed using STATA.

This study protocol received ethical approval on 23 April 2025 from the Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche in the Canton of Geneva, Switzerland. The identification number is 2024-02289. Submission to peer-reviewed journals and presentation in international congresses for the dissemination of the study findings are planned.

Clinical Trials number is NCT07319039; Pre-results.

Healthcare logistics involves the coordination of resources, services and infrastructure to ensure timely and efficient care delivery. Process mining offers data-driven insights into logistical workflows such as patient transport, inventory management and scheduling. This systematic review aims to synthesise evidence on the application of process mining in healthcare logistics, focusing on its impact on operational efficiency, resource utilisation and service delivery.

A systematic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science and ABI/Inform for studies published from 1999 onward. Eligible studies will include observational studies, case reports, conference papers and meta-analyses focusing on process mining applications to logistical processes in healthcare settings. Studies screening, data extraction and methodological quality assessment will be conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data will be extracted on key dimensions and performance indicators and will be presented in a structured format. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, and findings will be categorised and thematically analysed where appropriate. Primary outcomes include improvements in logistical efficiency, traceability, resource utilisation and sustainability. Secondary outcomes include implementation challenges, data integration issues and limitations in applying process mining techniques to logistical workflows.

The results of the systematic review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant conference. The data we will use do not include individual patient data, so ethical approval is not required.

CRD420251164812.

To identify predictors of treatment changes and to evaluate the effectiveness and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating tofacitinib in a real-world setting.

The non-interventional study ESCALATE-RA included 1518 patients with RA from Germany. RA treatment, including all changes in therapy, was documented for 24 months starting from the initial intake of tofacitinib.

All patients started with tofacitinib therapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX).

The impact of several factors of interest on the number and timing of treatment changes was assessed as primary outcome using Cox proportional hazards models. Further outcomes were tofacitinib drug survival and the use of follow-up disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs after first treatment change. We also assessed the effectiveness, concomitant glucocorticoid (GC) use, PROs (such as functional ability, patient satisfaction, pain and quality of life) and safety. Analyses were based on observed data.

‘Lack of efficacy’ (HR 3.30) and ‘intolerance’ (HR 4.43) leading to termination of tofacitinib were key factors favouring therapy changes. Higher patient satisfaction was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment changes (HR 0.82). Increasing GC doses were associated with a higher probability of step-up/switch changes (HR 1.21). The estimated tofacitinib drug survival was 48% at the end of study. Proportions of patients achieving low disease activity (both Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 62%) and remission (SDAI 25%, CDAI 28%) increased from baseline under tofacitinib and were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy with MTX. Mean concomitant GC dose decreased (2 mg/day). PROs indicated reduced pain and fatigue, while functional ability and quality of life improved. 63.9% of the patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), 8.8% a treatment-emergent AE of special interest and deaths occurred in 0.5%.

Key factors for therapy changes in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib were lack of efficacy and intolerance. Higher patient satisfaction was associated with a reduced probability of treatment changes, while increased GC doses led to a higher likelihood of step-ups/switches. Patients demonstrated a marked reduction in disease activity for up to 24 months, along with improvements in functional ability, pain and quality of life. Observed AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of tofacitinib.

NCT03387423.

Childhood overweight and obesity pose a growing public health problem with increasing prevalence both in Europe and globally. Reasons can be found in behavioural factors such as a sedentary lifestyle, eating habits or low exercise levels and to a lesser extent in a genetic predisposition or a metabolic disorder. Preventing children with obesity and overweight to grow into obese teenagers is therefore of high importance. However, there are currently no established care and prevention programmes in Germany for the early reduction of overweight and prevention of obesity in children aged 3–6 years. fruehstArt aims to close this gap with a cross-sector outreach and family-centred personal counselling approach, where parents receive support from paediatricians and trained coaches who conduct consultations in the home of the family. The main research question is whether the fruehstArt programme reduces overweight and obesity in children aged 3–6 years within 12 months, as measured by the body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS).

fruehstArt has been developed as a new form of care, which includes a family intervention with motivational interviews provided by paediatricians and individual home-based counselling provided by a trained coach on eating behaviour, exercising, sleeping behaviour and age-appropriate use of electronic devices. fruehstArt will be accompanied by an efficacy study (summative evaluation of change in BMI-SDS). In addition to German, the project is also offered in Turkish in order to reach families with a migration background and language barriers. 812 children with overweight or obesity and their families in the region North Rhine will be included and observed over 12 months. Recruitment of children occurred from December 2023 to April 2025 with the final visits scheduled for April 2026. The study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial with a social-ecological intervention approach, considering children in their living environment and conditions. Moreover, a formative evaluation at the process level, and the system level will be carried out and complemented by a health economic analysis. Those are carried out to provide information about the intervention’s success and relevant costs. Thus, fruehstArt is realised in the form of an effectiveness–implementation hybrid design that combines the analysis of effectiveness with an evaluation of the implementation process.

The study received ethics approval in a coordinated procedure from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty University hospital of Cologne and the ethics committee of the North Rhine Medical Association. For all collected data, the relevant national and European data protection regulations will be considered. All personal data (contact details) will be removed for the data analysis in order to ensure pseudonymisation. Dissemination strategies include reports and quality workshops for organisations, peer-reviewed publications and the presentation of results at conferences.

The aim of the unique form of care fruehstArt is to improve the care of preschool children with overweight or obesity through innovative home-based counselling, cross-sectoral service integration and to address the cultural needs of Turkish families.

DRKS00030749 (29-09-2023)

Night shift work is well known to cause health disruption in the short and long term. Among healthcare workers, sleep deprivation is a common concern with many nurses reporting sleep of

A 12-week randomised controlled trial will be performed with two conditions: (1) a 30 min nap opportunity during night shift work in a dedicated quiet room with a bed and (2) a control condition including a 30 min rest period in a break room. A total of 80 nurses and assistant nurses from interventional care units working a 2x12 hour shift schedule will be recruited. The main outcome will be endothelial dysfunction assessed through the reactive hyperaemia index using the EndoPAT device. Secondary outcomes will include other cardiovascular risk biomarkers, including arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity), blood pressure, heart rate variability, proinflammatory blood parameters, self-reported fatigue, recovery needs, sleep quality and sleepiness, which will be assessed using validated questionnaires. Our study will address whether napping on the night shift can decrease cardiovascular risk through early cardiovascular biomarkers, including endothelial function, arterial stiffness and heart rate variability. If effective, such interventions could contribute to the development of more sustainable and health-conscious shift work practices, benefiting both workers and the organisations that employ them.

The study protocol is in accordance with ethical principles established by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki 1964) and received approval from an institutional review board ‘comité de protection des personnes EST III’ (23CH138). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

NCT05955729; ClinicalTrials.gov 2023-A01109-36 Registered on 21 July 2023.

The analgesic and antipyretic paracetamol (acetaminophen) is generally considered safe in therapeutic doses. The most important toxic effect is hepatotoxicity after supratherapeutic doses or in the presence of risk factors (eg, malnutrition, alcoholism). According to the WHO analgesic ladder, a combination of a non-opioid analgesic such as paracetamol with a strong opioid is recommended as step III treatment of patients with chronic pain, despite limited evidence for this approach. The main aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that paracetamol does not provide clinically relevant benefits when added to strong opioids in patients with chronic pain.

Investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial at two Swiss hospitals. A total of 140 patients with chronic pain requiring strong opioids and paracetamol ≥1.5 g/day for at least 7 days will be enrolled and randomised to either continued combination treatment or strong opioid plus placebo. In the first study phase (days 1–7), patients receive identically looking capsules containing either paracetamol at the exact dose previously used or a placebo. During a second study phase (days 7–14), all patients stop the blinded study medication (paracetamol and placebo) with follow-up to day 14. Adherence will be assessed by pill count and measurement of paracetamol and opioid serum concentrations. Patients are instructed to use a pain diary daily during the whole study. The primary outcome is the average pain score on day 7 using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). A difference between groups of ≤8 mm will be considered clinically irrelevant. Secondary outcomes will include VAS pain score on day 14, number of opioid rescue doses used, subjective ratings of overall feeling of well-being, quality of life, nausea/vomiting, drowsiness and constipation, and other adverse events, and potential effects of study drug concentrations and opioid receptor and cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotypes on the observed differences.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Ethikkommission Bern, reference number 2021-01518) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic, reference number 701286). Results will be published in open-access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B_201072).

NCT05088876.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare and often large malignancies that frequently require extensive surgery for complete tumour removal. Resections of the colorectum are part of the standard resection, this way contributing to complication rates, including anastomotic leakage or obstruction. Surgical strategies for stoma formation and colorectal reconstruction remain poorly defined. The Colorectal Resections and Postoperative Quality of Life in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients Across German-Speaking Sarcoma Centres (COLOSARC-Q) study aims to explore surgical procedures and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing colorectal procedures during RPS surgery.

COLOSARC-Q is a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study and will recruit 120 patients with primary RPS who undergo colorectal resection as part of sarcoma surgery in a sarcoma referral centre in Germany or Switzerland. HRQoL is assessed using standardised questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29) as well as semi-structured interviews by psycho-oncology services and patient advocates. Data will be collected via an electronic Case Report Form, encompassing demographic, clinical, surgical and outcome-related information. All data will be centrally analysed. For the assessment of quality of life, a qualitative analysis with content and context analysis, as well as evaluation of the questionnaires according to a standardised scoring system, is planned. The primary aim is to evaluate surgical techniques for bowel resection and reconstruction and their influence on the further course of disease. Secondary endpoints assess postoperative complications as well as tumour-, patient- and treatment-related factors.

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee II of the University of Heidelberg (approval number 2024-562; 13 June 2024). The data protection review was approved by the data protection officer of the University of Heidelberg. Participation of other centres in the study requires local ethical approval. All patients will be required to sign an informed consent form. Results of primary and secondary endpoints will be published.

NCT06943612; German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00034135).

This study evaluates how participants experienced and assessed a three-round Delphi study on the terminology of developmental language disorders in childhood. It compares participants who completed all rounds (completers) with those who withdrew early (dropouts) and aims to derive methodological quality criteria for future Delphi studies.

The evaluation is based on a Delphi study conducted in 2021/2022 across five German-speaking countries. After the final round, n=179 experts (40% response rate) completed a standardised survey assessing their expertise, motivation, reasons for discontinuation, time commitment and perceptions of questionnaire and feedback design. Responses from completers (n=156) and dropouts (n=23) were analysed descriptively.

Most participants had no prior experience with Delphi methods but rated the study positively and considered the topic highly relevant. Completers reported their subjective time commitment to be lower and rated the handling of the questionnaire more positively than dropouts. Feedback was used by nearly half of all experts and was more actively considered by completers. Lack of time was the most common reason for discontinuation.

The findings confirm the feasibility and acceptance of the Delphi method in interdisciplinary health research. In addition to established methodological principles, topic relevance, clear communication and time commitment emerged as key areas for expert motivation and engagement.

Despite the high prevalence of chronic low back pain (cLBP), its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Addressing modifiable psychosocial resources and health behaviours such as physical activity offers a promising avenue for reducing the impact of cLBP. Furthermore, although the relationship between physical activity and pain is theorised as a within-person process, previous research has primarily focused on between-person differences. In this article, we present the protocol for the prospective observational study PRIA (Psychologie und Rückengesundheit im Alltag), which is part of a larger interdisciplinary research consortium investigating preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of cLBP. Drawing on theories from health and pain psychology, the outlined study examines the interplay between different dimensions of cLBP and back health, physical activity and their psychosocial determinants within individuals in their everyday lives.

This prospective longitudinal study combines online questionnaires with ecological momentary assessment of health behaviours, cognitions, affect, social support and pain using a smartphone-based app (movisensXS) and continuous measurement of physical activity by accelerometry (movisens Move 4). Parameters will be recorded at baseline (T0), daily for the following 14 days (five times per day at 09:00, 12:00, 15:00, 18:00 and 21:00, resulting in up to 70 measurement occasions), 3 and 6 months later (T1 and T2). A total of 230 participants (115 individuals with cLBP and 115 without cLBP) aged 18–64 years will be enrolled. The associations between cLBP and the measured parameters will be examined using multilevel models.

The university’s ethics committee at the MSB Medical School Berlin approved the study on 8 March 2021 (approval number MSB-2021/59, amendment approved on 10 November 2023, amendment number MSB-2023/145). Ethical approval for the FOR 5177 initial screening was granted by Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (EA1/058/21). All participants provided written informed consent. The results of this research will be published in peer-reviewed international journals, presented at national and international conferences, and reported to the German Research Foundation.

DRKS00032978.

Current pharmacological treatment options for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) often fail to provide adequate pain relief. However, in the recent SENZA-PDN study, high-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) demonstrated significant long-term improvements in lower limb pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a PDN population. Furthermore, more than half of 10 kHz SCS recipients showed improved sensory function based on non-blinded clinical assessments in post hoc analysis. We report the design of the PDN-Sensory study, which aims to evaluate changes in pain and neurological function with 10 kHz SCS in the treatment of PDN. The study will include objective measures of neurological function, including the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS) and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD).

This multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial will compare conventional medical management (CMM) with 10 kHz SCS+CMM in individuals with diabetes and chronic, intractable lower limb pain due to PDN. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to CMM alone or 10 kHz SCS+CMM, with optional crossover at 6 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants at 6 months achieving ≥50% pain relief from baseline. The key secondary endpoint is the proportion of participants at 6 months with a reduction in mTCNS of ≥3 points from baseline (excluding changes in foot pain). Additional endpoints at 6 and 12 months include changes from baseline in mTCNS, IENFD, 7-day averaged pain score, pain-related interference, HRQoL, sleep, psychological outcomes, functional status and metabolic parameters.

The study protocol received central approval from the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB #20230954). Local IRB approval will be required before initiation of the study at each participating clinical site. The study complies with Good Clinical Practice guidelines (ISO 14155), the Declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable national, federal and local regulatory requirements. Dissemination plans include presentations at national and international conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal with open access.

NCT05777317.

A successful extubation process is critical for the future health outcomes of paediatric patients, as it tests the functioning of the respiratory system without the support of mechanical ventilation. However, extubation can cause stress, pain, anxiety or discomfort in patients, which may sometimes lead to an increased likelihood of reintubation. Music-based interventions and therapies have been shown to be effective in reducing anxiety and stress levels in ventilated patients in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), but studies evaluating the effect of music therapy during the extubation process in the PICU are scarce.

This is a pragmatic multicentre randomised clinical trial with two parallel arms. The intervention group will receive standard care + music therapy during the extubation process, and the control group will receive standard care alone. The main outcome measure is heart rate, which will be measured every minute for 5 min pre-extubation, during the extubation process and up to 10 min postextubation. Secondary outcome measures are: oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, blood pressure and heart rate variability. A total of 82 patients will be randomised.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Fundación Universitaria Sanitas (CEIFUS 1356-24, date of approval: 3 May 2024). All parents or legal guardians of patients will sign a written informed consent, and if applicable, assent from participants will be sought. The results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and presentations at the hospitals’ clinical committees.

Version 1.0, 18 December 2024.

NCT06591533, trial registration date: 10 September 2024.

A ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metric, developed for hastening the response to infectious disease outbreaks/pandemics, was adapted to improve screening and managing household contacts (HHCs) of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients. The feasibility, enablers, challenges and utility of implementing this modified metric through TB Champions (TB survivors) for HHC management were assessed.

This was an explanatory mixed-methods study with a cohort design (quantitative) followed by a descriptive design with focus group discussions (qualitative).

The study was conducted within routine programmatic settings in public health facilities in six districts from three states of India.

In total, 595 drug-susceptible index pulmonary TB patients registered for treatment in the selected health facilities, and their listed 2108 HHCs were included in the study between December 2022 and August 2023. All 17 TB Champions involved in implementation participated in the focus group discussions.

The primary outcome measures were the percentage of eligible participants receiving the desired service within the ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metric and challenges in achieving the timeliness metrics.

In 89% of 595 index patients, their HHCs were line-listed within 7 days of initiating anti-TB treatment (‘First-7’). In 90% of 2108 HHCs, screening outcomes were ascertained within 1 day of line-listing (‘Next-1’). In 42% of 2073 HHCs eligible for further evaluation, anti-TB treatment, TB preventive treatment (TPT) or a decision to not receive medication were made within 7 days of screening (‘Second-7’). Barriers to TPT uptake included lack of money and daily wage losses for travelling to clinics, reluctance of asymptomatic contacts to take medication and fear of adverse events. TB Champions felt timeliness metrics improved performance in the systematic and timely management of HHCs.

TB Champions found ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metrics were feasible and useful, and national TB programmes should consider their operationalisation.

To explore health professionals’ perspectives on the barriers and enablers of healthcare access for older adults in Cambodia.

A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews conducted in Khmer, recorded, transcribed, translated into English and analysed using an abductive thematic analysis approach.

Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

A purposive sample of 11 health professionals serving in diverse roles and sectors participated in the study.

Three key barriers emerged: (1) institutional barriers, (2) patient-specific access barriers and (3) communication barriers. However, four key enablers were also identified: (1) supportive healthcare environment, (2) reaching out to improve access to health services, (3) peer and community engagement and (4) government direct support to access healthcare. Despite previous policy efforts, gaps in the implementation of healthcare services for older adults persist across all health facilities. Health professionals identified that improving healthcare access for older adults in Cambodia requires a multifaceted strategy involving proactive outreach, health promotion, financial assistance and stronger community and family support.

Effective policy implementation requires collaboration among stakeholders and the active involvement of older adults in programme design to enhance dignity and well-being in Cambodia’s ageing population.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in society across many spheres, including healthcare, the economy and social behaviours. While early predictions warned of an increased risk of suicide during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of suicide deaths remained stable or decreased over that period for most countries. In contrast, the prevalence of suicidal ideation doubled and suicide attempts slightly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult general population worldwide, accompanied by a higher prevalence of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. While these data can tell us what happened, they cannot tell us why. Qualitative suicide research seeks to understand experiences of individuals with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, provides an in-depth exploration of their lives and interactions with others and centres their views and unique context. There is little qualitative research focusing on suicidality during the pandemic. This study will use a qualitative approach to explore the extent and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadians who experienced suicidality and review their experiences of accessing mental healthcare to identify key components in supporting safety and recovery.

This study will involve approximately 100 semistructured interviews with participants across four Canadian provinces and will explore experiences with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transcripts will be analysed through qualitative analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network (for JZ: CAMH REB No 104-2022). In addition to traditional peer-reviewed presentations and publications, a report will make study findings accessible to policy makers, media and the public.

The only supportive therapy for patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication among the critically ill, is dialysis. Based on the literature and current guidelines, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with a total effluent dose of 20–25 mL/kg/hour and adjustments to ensure such dose is delivered despite down time (eg, due to surgical procedures) is recommended. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that azotaemia, which can be induced by lowering the effluent dose, may accelerate renal recovery. This clinical study investigates whether a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) for a maximum of 7 days or until successful (>24 hours) liberation of CRRT in critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI accelerates renal recovery and reduces time on CRRT compared with guideline-directed standard dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour).

The Ketzerei trial is an international, multicentre randomised, controlled trial, designed to investigate if a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) accelerates renal recovery and reduces the time on CRRT compared with the guideline directed standard effluent dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour). The study aims to enrol 150 critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either a standard effluent dose (control group, 25–30 mL/kg/hour) or lower effluent dose (interventional group, 10–15 mL/kg/hour). The primary endpoint is the number of days free from CRRT and alive (from randomisation through day 28). Key secondary endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events due to potential uremia, the duration of RRT and intensive care unit survival.

The Ketzerei trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe (2023–343 f-s), the University of Muenster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research.

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06021288).