Conectar
(1) Explore the role of core abdominal exercise in people living with a stoma in Australia; (2) determine whether the presence of a parastomal hernia influenced participant symptoms and complications, health status, experiences with different types of exercise, recall advice given by healthcare professionals; (3) determine whether there is an appetite for supervised/supported exercise programs.
A cross-sectional, anonymous survey.
Between August and September 2022. The survey included Likert scales and a single free text response. Logistic regression and Cramer's V were used to explore relationships between variables.
Approximately half (45.5%) of 105 participants reported a parastomal hernia. Those with a parastomal hernia were less likely to recall having received advice (15.20%) or demonstration (9.40%) pertaining to exercise. Less than a quarter of all participants completed strengthening (23.80%) or vigorous (22.90%) exercise. Fear of vigorous exercise, abdominal exercise and heavy lifting were high in both groups. Relationships between healthcare advice, exercise-related fears and avoidance of heavy lifting were observed.
Many Australians living with a stoma are not achieving physical activity recommendations. While exercise behaviours did not differ between people with and without a parastomal hernia, recall of healthcare advice around exercise did. Fear-avoidance relationships were observed.
Most people living with a stoma do not recall advice about core abdominal exercises. Healthcare practitioners need to be aware of fear-avoidance related to lifting among people living with a stoma. This was the first study in Australia, exploring perspectives and experiences regarding exercise; providing foundations for future research particularly exercise programs.
This study adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines and the reporting of survey studies (CROSS).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a Nurse Practitioner led procedural support service for children with procedural anxiety, and identify facilitators and barriers to its sustained implementation and optimisation.
An effectiveness–implementation hybrid type 3 study used a prospective mixed methods evaluation approach.
From December 2022 to May 2023, data were collected from children, parents and clinicians using a nurse practitioner-led service at a quaternary paediatric hospital in Brisbane, Australia. A prospective audit assessed clinical outcomes, while qualitative interviews explored implementation barriers and facilitators.
The clinical audit (n = 40) confirmed the service was effective and safe, ensuring procedural completion with minimal distress. Descriptive statistics indicated low pain and anxiety scores. There was a moderate negative relationship between pain scores and the use of distraction techniques. Interviews with thirty-three participants showed the service improved access to procedural care, reduced the need for physical restraint and general anaesthesia, and enhanced clinical workflow through preadmission assessments.
Utilising a Nurse Practitioner support service represents a safe and effective strategy to enhance access for paediatric patients with procedural anxiety.
This study underscores the significance of specialised nursing roles in managing paediatric procedural anxiety, offering a replicable model to enhance procedural outcomes and mitigate medical trauma across healthcare settings.
Minimising pain and distress is important in all clinical encounters with children to reduce the risk of medical-related trauma and the future avoidance of healthcare.
The report of study outcomes was guided by the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) initiative.
Patients or the public were not included in the design, conduct or reporting of the study.
by Samantha Jeffcoat, Adrian Aragon, Andrian Kuch, Shawn Farrokhi, Andrew Hooyman, Russell Johnson, Natalia Sanchez
Studies of locomotor adaptation have shown that adaptation can occur in short bouts and can continue for long bouts or across days. Information about task duration might influence the adaptation of gait features, given that task duration influences the time available to explore and adapt the aspects of gait that reduce energy cost. We hypothesized that information about task duration and frequency of updates influences adaptation to split-belt walking based on two competing mechanisms: individuals anticipating a prolonged adaptation period may either (1) extend exploration of energetically suboptimal gait patterns, or (2) adapt toward a more energy-efficient pattern earlier to maintain an energetic reserve. We tested three groups: N = 19 participants received minute-by-minute updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration (True group), N = 19 participants received no updates during a 10-minute adaptation duration and were misled to expect a prolonged 30-minute adaptation duration (False group), and N = 14 participants received one update halfway through a 10-minute adaptation duration (Control group). We measured step length asymmetry, leg work, and metabolic cost. Our results partially supported our hypothesis but did not confirm the underlying mechanisms. While step length asymmetry did not differ significantly between groups during adaptation, the True group generated a more effortful gait pattern with a greater increase in metabolic cost and higher work with the slow leg. Additionally, the True group showed no association between the different adapted gait variables such as step length asymmetry and metabolic cost, contrary to the Control and False groups. Finally, we observed that the False group showed greater retention of the split-belt aftereffects than the Control and False groups. Thus, adapted locomotor and energetic patterns are influenced by information about task duration, indicating that Information about task duration should be controlled for, or can be manipulated to elicit different efforts during adaptation.Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with symptomatic PAD often require endovascular revascularisation to relieve pain or salvage limbs. However, the iodinated intra-arterial contrast routinely used in these procedures is nephrotoxic, placing patients with CKD at increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term renal decline. Carbon dioxide (CO2) delivered via automated injection is a potential alternative imaging contrast medium. This trial will evaluate whether using CO2 instead of iodinated contrast reduces the risk of AKI and short-term renal function decline in this high-risk group.
This is a multicentre, open-label, prospective randomised controlled trial across six secondary-care National Health Service (NHS) vascular surgery centres. A total of 174 patients with PAD and CKD undergoing endovascular intervention will be randomised 1:1 to receive iodinated contrast (standard of care) or CO2 via automated injector (Angiodroid). All perioperative care will follow local NHS protocols.
The primary outcome is log serum creatinine at 2, 30 and 90 days postprocedure. Key secondary outcomes include: incidence and severity of AKI within 48 hours postprocedure, major adverse kidney events (death, dialysis or >25% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline) by 90 days, inpatient length of stay, procedural pain, quality of life, procedural success, reinterventions, acceptability and feasibility (patient/practitioner questionnaires) of using CO2, and cost-effectiveness (healthcare resource use analysis). A mixed-methods process evaluation will be undertaken with patients and clinicians.
The trial has been approved by an NHS ethical review committee (24/WA/0332) and patients have been involved in trial design. Findings will be disseminated to participants, clinicians and the wider public through patient groups, lay summaries, social media, conferences, peer-reviewed journals and NHS policy channels.
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are severe complications of diabetes that often lead to major amputations. Despite care advancements, approximately 50% of minor amputations do not heal, resulting in major amputations and increased mortality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) obtained through superficial enhanced fluid fat injection (SEFFI) in improving healing rates after minor amputations in DFUs. It was a prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study. The patients were monitored for half a year using monthly assessments. The primary endpoint was the healing rate of the amputation stumps after minor amputations coupled with ASC injections. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility, adverse events and analysis of variables associated with healing including the analysis of the injected mesenchymal adipose stem cell populations. Of the 256 screened patients, 40 were enrolled. At 6 months, 55% of the treated stumps had healed completely. The median healing time was 69 days. Technical success was achieved in all cases without device-related complications. Multivariable Cox models identified haemodialysis, opioid use and the injected number of CD45-positive cells as risk factors for healing failure. CD73 expression was positively associated with healing. The SEFFIDiFA trial demonstrated a promising 69% healing probability at 6 months post-amputation. This minimally invasive approach showed a higher healing rate with fewer complications. This study supports the potential of ASCs in enhancing wound healing in DFUs and highlights the importance of CD73 expression for successful outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and optimise the technique.
To establish, through patient and public involvement (PPI) events, the exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences of people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Qualitative ‘best fit’ framework analysis was used to analyse field notes and transcripts collected during three patient and public involvement meetings and three workshops. The best fit framework was based on the COM-B model of behaviour change, which has identified that Capability, Opportunity and Motivation components are essential for Behaviour change. The Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research checklist was used to structure the report.
Setting and participants: Community dwelling older adults with HFpEF.
24 people with HFpEF (n=16 female, 66%), 2 spouses and 2 people with chronic conditions participated in the PPI meetings and workshops. Multiple exercise-related capability (negative symptoms, functional ability, resilience and self-efficacy and knowledge and skill); opportunity (appealing components, optimal conditions, adequate support); and motivation factors (well-being, physical gains, goal achievement, sense of enjoyment) were identified as essential to facilitating change in exercise behaviours in people with HFpEF.
This study provides insight into capability, opportunity and motivation conditions that people with HFpEF feel are necessary to enable them to engage in exercise-related behaviour change. This work extends previous post hoc work by moving beyond identification of broad influencers that may enable or impede exercise intervention engagement, to identify intervention conditions necessary to affect change.
by Samantha Hertz, Finnegan Klein, Todd L. Bredbenner, Miranda Cosman, Karl J. Jepsen
Developing a strong skeleton during growth is critical for minimizing fractures later in life. Prior work showed that bone mass varied with external bone size, a measure of the outer bone width. We tested how this association affected the identification of children with low bone mass. Radiographs of the nondominant hand of 45 White females and 54 White males, all ~ 8 years old, were assessed and second metacarpal length (Le) and the midshaft outer and inner widths were measured at the 40, 50, and 60% midshaft sites. The average total area (Tt.Ar), a measure of the area enclosed by the periosteal surface, and cortical area (Ct.Ar), a measure of bone mass, were calculated assuming a circular cross-section. Individuals were sorted into tertiles using robustness (Tt.Ar/Le). Z-scores were calculated for Ct.Ar first using the cohort mean and standard deviation and second using each robustness tertile mean and standard deviation. Females and males with Z-scores in the lower 33% range were identified for the group-average and tertile-specific average comparisons. Agreement between the two reference group approaches was determined using Cohen’s kappa statistic for each sex. The percentage of individuals identified with low Ct.Ar depended on whether Z-scores were compared to the group average or tertile-specific averages. When compared to the group average, 67% of females and 56% of males identified with lower Ct.Ar were from the narrowest tertile, whereas 0% of females and 22% of males were from the widest tertile. For females and males, Cohen’s kappa coefficient showed almost perfect agreement for the intermediate tertile (kappa coefficient > 0.84), but agreement was only poor to moderate (kappa coefficientClinical research nurses work at the fulcrum of clinical trials with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. In England, the National Institute for Health Research (the main funder of health research) has broadened its scope to encompass social care research. The expectation is that clinical research nurses will expand their skill set to support these new studies, many of which will employ qualitative and mixed methods. This discussion paper explores the challenges of facilitating this clinical academic workforce development through a case study of a homeless health and social care research project. This was one of the first studies to engage clinical research nurses in this new and expanded role.
Much of what is known about the research nurse workforce has been generated through studies of clinical trials in oncology. The ‘caring-recruiting’ dichotomy has been used as a heuristic device for identifying workforce issues that can impact on study delivery such as how intense pressure to recruit study participants leads to low job satisfaction.
This case study reflects on the authors' experiences of employing a clinical research nurse in a social care research project concerned with the discharge of homeless people from hospital. The ‘caring-recruiting’ dichotomy is used to generate new information about the relationship between workforce development and the successful delivery of social care research.
The case study illuminates how social care research can generate different pressures and ethical challenges for research nurses. The time and skill it took to recruit study participants identified as ‘hard to reach’ was suggestive of the need to move beyond performance measures that prioritise recruitment metrics. The need for different types of staff supervision and training was also warranted as supporting study participants who were homeless was often distressing, leading to professional boundary issues.
This study highlights that performance management, training and supervisory arrangements must be tailored to the characteristics of each new study coming onto the portfolio to ensure research nurses are fully supported in this new and expanded role.
To evaluate the impact of a participatory, action-oriented implementation study, guided by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, for optimising pain care processes in a tertiary paediatric emergency department.
Hybrid type 3 implementation effectiveness.
A collaborative appraisal of the context and culture of pain care informed two interdependent action cycles: Enabling nurse-initiated analgesia and involving families in pain care. The Kids Pain Collaborative, an authentic clinical–academic partnership, was central to facilitating successful implementation. Summative evaluation explored the impact of implementation on processes of pain care using an interrupted time series analysis and emotional touchpoint interviews with families.
Staff achieved clinically important and sustained improvements in the rate of nurse-initiated analgesia and pain assessment. Family involvement in pain care shifted from task-orientated practices towards more person-centred ways of working and decision-making. As capacity for collective leadership developed, frontline staff found ways to integrate the KPC approach into ED systems to lead pain care innovation beyond the life of the research project.
The Kids Pain Collaborative, as the overarching implementation strategy, created a practitioner-led coalition for change. Successful implementation was facilitated by working with four interdependent principles: Collaborative and authentic engagement; enabling context for cultural transformation; creating safe spaces for critical reflection and workplace learning; and embedding sustainable practice change.
A multi-level model of internal–external facilitation enabled sustained improvement in pain care practice. An embedded researcher was pivotal in this process.
Authentic engagement of clinicians and families was pivotal in transforming systems of pain care and enabling a culture where "it is not ok for children to wait in pain"
The principles underpinning the Kids Pain Collaborative are transferable to other emergency department and acute care contexts.
Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies checklist.
To implement strategies to improve the care of patients with acute pain in the emergency department (ED).
Pre–post implementation study using a Type 2 hybrid effectiveness–implementation design.
Implementation strategies were introduced and monitored through the Ottawa Model of Research Uses' assessment, monitoring and evaluation cycles, supported by focused and sustained facilitation.
Improvements in time-to-analgesia within 30 min (21%–27%), administration of nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA) (17%–27%) and measurement of pain (65%–75%) were achieved post-implementation. NIA was the strongest predictor of receiving analgesia within 30 min. Adoption of pain interventions into practice was not immediate yet responded to sustained facilitation of implementation strategies.
Collaboration with local clinicians to introduce simple interventions that did not disrupt workflow or substantially add to workload were effective in improving analgesia administration rates, and the proportion of patients receiving analgesia within 30 min. The assessment, monitoring and evaluation cycles enabled agile and responsive facilitation of implementation activities within the dynamic ED environment. Improvements took time to embed into practice, trending upward over the course of the implementation period, supporting the sustained facilitation approach throughout the study.
Sustained adoption of evidence-based pain interventions into the care of people presenting to the ED with acute pain can be achieved through sustained facilitation of implementation. NIA should be at the centre of acute pain management in the ED.
This study addressed the lingering gap between evidence and practice for patients with acute pain in the ED. Implementation of locally relevant/informed implementation strategies supported by focused and sustained facilitation improved the care of patients with acute pain in the ED. This research will have an impact on people presenting to EDs with acute pain, and on clinicians treating people with acute pain in the ED. Relevant equator guidelines were followed and the StaRI reporting method used.
No Patient or Public Contribution in this study.
To explore the implementation contexts and strategies that influence the uptake and selection of alternative peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) materials and design.
Qualitative evaluation of end user perspectives within a randomized control trial of different PICC materials and design.
Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders were undertaken via an adapted, rapid-analytic approach using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Outcomes were mapped against the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool for strategies to guide innovation in PICC practice.
Participants (n = 23) represented a combination of users and inserters/purchasers, from adult and paediatric settings. Dominant themes included intervention characteristics (intervention source), inner setting (structural characteristics) and individuals involved (self-efficacy). Strategies emerging to support a change from ERIC mapping (n = 16) included promotion of intervention adaptability, inclusion of staff and consumer perspectives and sufficient funding. Implementation contexts such as inner setting and individuals involved equally impacted PICC success and implementation effectiveness and enabled a greater understanding of barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation in this trial.
Trial evidence is important, but healthcare decision-making requires consideration of local contexts especially resourcing. Implementation contexts for Australian healthcare settings include a practical, strategic toolkit for the implementation of alternative PICC materials and designs.
This study adhered to COREQ guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
Paediatric patients with complex or acute conditions may require a central venous access device, however, almost one-third of these devices have associated complications (e.g. infections). Implementation of evidence-based practices regarding central venous access devices can reduce and potentially prevent complications.
This scoping review aimed to explore recent interventional research in CVAD management through an implementation lens.
This scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Studies were included if they were written in English, published in 2012 to July 2023, involved children and were relevant to the study aims. Risk of bias was appraised by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Searches were undertaken in EMBASE, CINAHL (Ebsco), PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL).
Of the 1769 studies identified in a systematic search, 46 studies were included. Studies mostly focused on health professionals and central venous access device maintenance and had quantitative pre-post study designs. Adherence to implementation frameworks was lacking, with many studies employing quality improvement approaches. Implementation strategies were typically multipronged, using health-professional education, bundles and working groups. Bundle compliance and reductions in central line-associated bloodstream infections were the most featured outcomes, with most studies primarily focusing on effectiveness outcomes.
Translation of evidence-based practices to the clinical setting is difficult and current adoption of implementation frameworks (apart from ‘quality improvement’) is limited. Implementation strategies are diverse and dependent on the local context, and study outcomes typically focus on the effectiveness of the physical intervention, rather than measuring the implementation effort itself.
Future intervention research requires a more uniform and deliberate application of implementation frameworks and strategies.
Greater exploration of relationships between frameworks and strategies and implementation and service outcomes is required to increase understanding of their role in maximizing resources to improve health care.
Adhered to best reporting guidelines as per PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018).
No patient or public contribution.
Severe aorto-iliac steno-occlusive atherosclerotic disease is a major cause of morbidity and amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. While both open surgical and endovascular revascularisation are standard treatments in this patient group, there is no high-quality randomised evidence to determine which approach offers superior clinical and cost-effectiveness, leading to uncertainty and poor outcomes after intervention.
The EVOCC trial is a national, multicentre, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing open surgery to endovascular revascularisation in patients with symptomatic severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A total of 628 participants across 30 NHS sites in the UK will be randomised 1:1 to receive either open surgery or endovascular (minimally invasive) intervention. The primary outcome is amputation-free survival, defined as time to first event (major lower limb amputation or death). Secondary outcomes include mortality, cardiovascular events, hospital readmissions, re-interventions and quality-of-life measures. An internal pilot phase (10 sites, 6-month duration) will assess recruitment feasibility. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment.
The trial has received ethical approval from a UK Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/SW/0065; trial registration reference: ISRCTN14591444). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
The EVOCC trial is the first RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of open vs endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac disease worldwide. The results will provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice and healthcare policies globally. Results will be disseminated via patient groups, online lay summaries, a trial website, social media, presentations in conferences, a formal scientific publication in a medical journal and direct communications with policymakers across borders.
To identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.
Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.
Nurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.
Addressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.
What problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.
PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
This study explored how Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are being undertaken and the challenges to their successful implementation and sustainability.
A cross-sectional mixed methods online survey.
Primary care in England.
120 clinical pharmacists with experience in conducting SMRs in primary care.
Survey responses were received from clinical pharmacists working in 15 different regions. The majority were independent prescribers (62%, n=74), and most were employed by Primary Care Networks (65%, n=78), delivering SMRs for one or more general practices. 61% (n=73) had completed, or were currently enrolled in, the approved training pathway. Patient selection was largely driven by the primary care contract specification: care home residents, patients with polypharmacy, patients on medicines commonly associated with medication errors, patients with severe frailty and/or patients using potentially addictive pain management medication. Only 26% (n=36) of respondents reported providing patients with information in advance. The majority of SMRs were undertaken remotely by telephone and were 21–30 min in length. Much variation was reported in approaches to conducting SMRs, with SMRs in care homes being deemed the most challenging due to additional complexities involved. Challenges included not having sufficient time to prepare adequately, address complex polypharmacy and complete follow-up work generated by SMRs, issues relating to organisational support, competing national priorities and lack of ‘buy-in’ from some patients and General Practitioners.
These results offer insights into the role being played by the clinical pharmacy workforce in a new country-wide initiative to improve the quality and safety of care for patients taking multiple medicines. Better patient preparation and trust, alongside continuing professional development, more support and oversight for clinical pharmacists conducting SMRs, could lead to more efficient medication reviews. However, a formal evaluation of the potential of SMRs to optimise safe medicines use for patients in England is now warranted.
In the UK, approximately 5.4 million adults live with asthma, of whom one in five have an uncontrolled form. Uncontrolled asthma reduces quality of life and increases healthcare use. Engaging with peers through online health communities (OHCs) can empower patients to self-manage their long-term condition. While OHCs have been in existence for several years and growing numbers of patients access them, the role of primary care in signposting patients to them has been minimal and ad hoc. We have co-developed with patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) an intervention for adult patients with asthma, consisting of an appointment with a primary care HCP to introduce online peer support and sign patients up to an established asthma OHC, followed by OHC engagement. Feasibility work found the intervention acceptable to patients and HCPs. This protocol outlines our plan to test the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
An individual randomised controlled trial will be carried out. Eligible participants will be recruited via an online survey sent to adult patients on the asthma register in 50–70 general practices in several UK locations. Participants will be invited to attend a one-off, face-to-face appointment with a primary care HCP, during which they will be individually randomised to the intervention or usual care. An asthma control test (primary outcome) and other measures of clinical effectiveness will be collected at baseline and every 3 months over a 12-month follow-up period. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to compare outcome measures between study arms. Cost-effectiveness assessment of the intervention compared with current standard of asthma management in primary care will be reported. A sample of patients and HCPs will be interviewed at study exit and the data analysed thematically.
The study was approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (reference: 25/NE/0006). Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through various means, including sharing with general practices, conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
The aim of this integrative review was to explore registered nurses' understandings of organisational culture and cultures of care in aged care.
Integrative literature review.
A literature search was conducted of Medline (OVID), CINAHL Plus with Full Text, Scopus, Proquest Nursing and Allied Health, and Informit databases in June 2024. In October 2024, a search for grey literature was conducted focusing on Google Scholar, the Analysis and Policy Observatory (Australia), Australian Government websites, European Union Institutions and Bodies, and usa.gov. The inclusion criteria were Australian and international literature published in English between 2004 and 2024. The inclusion criteria were amended to focus on literature published from 2014 to 2024.
Seventeen research studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Four primary themes were identified: competing hierarchies of power; the multifaceted role of nurses in long-term care settings; standing still is not an option; and implications for culture change strategies in practice.
Registered nurses in aged care are pivotal to evolving clinical and administrative practice and creating organisational cultures that affirm the rights of older people, including providing a supportive workplace for those who care for them, in an environment focussed on developing and sustaining quality care. Viewing the complex relationships at different organisational levels through the prism of Foucault's ideas on disciplinary power generates new insights into the role of registered nurses in aged care settings. This review also underscores that research on organisational culture in aged care is at a formative stage. There is potential for future research that fosters a robust evidence base to support the development of organisational cultures that nurture a person-centred environment ultimately leading to improved care and staff experience.
Registered nurses in aged care settings are advocating for a transformative shift in organisational cultures that prioritises inclusivity, compassion and person-centred care. Empowering nurses through clinical and administrative leadership roles is crucial for cultivating person-centred organisational cultures in aged care settings. It is essential that policymakers invest in the development of registered nurses who can excel in clinical and operational roles at management and executive levels. Policy changes that promote frameworks that facilitate nursing leadership are essential for establishing and maintaining person-centred workplace cultures.
Prisma extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA—ScR).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
by Charlotte J. Whiffin, Kathleen Joy O. Khu, Brandon G. Smith, Isla Kuhn, Santhani M. Selveindran, Laura Hobbs, Samin Davoody, Yusuf Docrat, Orla Mantle, Upamanyu Nath, Lara Onbaşı, Stasa Tumpa, Ignatius N. Esene, Harry Mee, Fergus Gracey, Shobhana Nagraj, Tom Bashford, Angelos G. Kolias, Peter J. Hutchinson
Following calls for more qualitative research in neurosurgery, this scoping review aimed to describe the range and reach of qualitative studies relevant to the field of neurosurgery and the patients and families affected by neurosurgical conditions. A systematic search was conducted in September 2024 across six databases: Medline via Ebsco; Embase via OVID; PsycINFO via Ebsco; Scopus; Web of Science Core Collection; and Global Health via Ebsco. Eligibility criteria were based on Population, Concept, and Context. The search identified 18,809 hits for screening with 812 included in the final analysis. Seven themes were identified from a content analysis of study aims: 1 Perspectives of living with a neurosurgical condition; 2 Family perspectives; 3 Perceptions of neurosurgery; 4 Perceptions of general healthcare care; 5 Decision making; 6 Advancing neurosurgery; and, 7 Understanding neurosurgical conditions. Traumatology was identified as the most researched sub-specialty (43.2%) yet few studies were led explicitly by a neurosurgeon (1.6%) or those with a neurosurgical affiliation (10.5%). Lead authors were predominantly from high income countries (93.7%), as were most multi-author teams (86.6%). There was a trend towards increasing publication over time; however, only 8.4% of papers were published in neurosurgical specific journals. The data set had an average Field Weighted Citation Impact of 0.96 and Field Weighted Views Impact of 1.11, 18.9% were cited in policy documents in 15 countries. This scoping review provides a comprehensive picture of the current qualitative research base in neurosurgery and suggests ways to improve the conduct and reporting of such studies in the future. Addressing these challenges is crucial if qualitative research is to advance the neurosurgical evidence base in a rigorous way.Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent a significant cause of postoperative morbidity and even mortality. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding this composite endpoint, the definition of the individual components, classification and optimal outcome measures. This study aims to refine the PPCs composite framework by evaluating its construct validity, assessing the necessity and risks of a composite measure and exploring the feasibility of differentiating severity categories.
A Delphi consensus process will be conducted, engaging an international multidisciplinary group of 30–40 panellists, including clinicians, researchers, patients, public representatives and health economists. Through iterative rounds, the study will seek agreement on the individual components of the PPCs composite. Additionally, consensus will establish a framework for a composite outcome measure based on a standardised severity classification, appropriate timeframes and weighted grading of PPCs.
Consensus, defined by ≥75% concurrence in multiple choice questions or on Likert–scale statements, will be evaluated from round 2 onwards. Delphi rounds will be continued until all statements have reached stability of responses evaluated by 2 tests or the Kruskal-Wallis test.
The study will be conducted in strict compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and will adhere to ACCORD guidance for reporting. Ethics approval has been obtained for this study from the University of Wolverhampton, UK (SOABE/202425/staff/3). Informed consent will be obtained from all panellists before the commencement of the Delphi process. The results of the study will be published in a peer–reviewed journal with the authorship assigned in accordance with ICMJE requirements.
NCT06916598 (clinicaltrials.gov).
It is unclear how mis- and disinformation regarding healthcare policy changes propagate throughout Latino communities via social media. This may lead to chilling effects that dissuade eligible individuals from enrolling in critical safety net programmes such as Medicaid. This study will examine pathways and mechanisms by which sentiment in response to mis- and disinformation regarding healthcare policies on social media differentially impact health disparity populations, thus supporting the design of tailored social media interventions to mitigate this.
We will search social media from X/Twitter, Facebook/Instagram and Reddit for keywords relating to health benefit programmes. Demographic, geographical location and other characteristics of users will be used to stratify social media data. Posts will be classified as fake-news-related or fact-related based on curated lists of fake-news-related websites. The number, temporal dissemination and positive or negative sentiment in reacting to posts and threads will be examined using the Python-based Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER). Using a crowd-sourcing methodology, a novel Spanish-language VADER (S-VADER) will be created to rate sentiment to social media among Spanish-speaking Latinos. With the proposed approach, we will explore reactions to the dissemination of fake-news- or fact-related social media tweets and posts and their sources. Analyses of social media posts in response to healthcare-related policies will provide insights into fears faced by Latinos and Spanish speakers, as well as positive or negative perceptions relating to the policy over time among social media users.
Our study protocol was approved by the University of California, Los Angeles IRB (IRB#23–0 01 123). Results from this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, and S-VADER will be disseminated to public repositories such as GitHub.
FreshRSS 