FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Consensus on the definition, components, timeframe and grading of composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complication--protocol for an international mixed-method consensus study (PrECiSIOn)

Por: Nasa · P. · Yurttas · T. · Battaglini · D. · Blot · S. · Fernandez-Bustamante · A. · Gama de Abreu · M. · van Meenen · D. M. · Myatra · S. N. · Serpa Neto · A. · Oppong · R. · Paulus · F. · Renukappa · S. · Schultz · M. J. · Slutsky · A. S. · Hemmes · S. N. T. · for the PrECiSIOn-gro
Introduction

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent a significant cause of postoperative morbidity and even mortality. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding this composite endpoint, the definition of the individual components, classification and optimal outcome measures. This study aims to refine the PPCs composite framework by evaluating its construct validity, assessing the necessity and risks of a composite measure and exploring the feasibility of differentiating severity categories.

Methods

A Delphi consensus process will be conducted, engaging an international multidisciplinary group of 30–40 panellists, including clinicians, researchers, patients, public representatives and health economists. Through iterative rounds, the study will seek agreement on the individual components of the PPCs composite. Additionally, consensus will establish a framework for a composite outcome measure based on a standardised severity classification, appropriate timeframes and weighted grading of PPCs.

Analysis

Consensus, defined by ≥75% concurrence in multiple choice questions or on Likert–scale statements, will be evaluated from round 2 onwards. Delphi rounds will be continued until all statements have reached stability of responses evaluated by 2 tests or the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Ethics and dissemination

The study will be conducted in strict compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and will adhere to ACCORD guidance for reporting. Ethics approval has been obtained for this study from the University of Wolverhampton, UK (SOABE/202425/staff/3). Informed consent will be obtained from all panellists before the commencement of the Delphi process. The results of the study will be published in a peer–reviewed journal with the authorship assigned in accordance with ICMJE requirements.

Trial registration number

NCT06916598 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Common mental health outcomes and access to support services among adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for a systematic review

Por: Klutsey · D. A. · Amankwah-Poku · M. · Quarshie · E. N.-B. · Oppong Asante · K.
Introduction

The prevalence of HIV in adolescents is a major global health concern, and research into the influence of HIV on mental health outcomes in this demographic is ongoing. We will conduct a comprehensive systematic review of common mental health outcomes in adolescents with HIV infection (aged 10–24 years). Recognising the specific psychosocial issues that adolescents living with HIV infection are confronted with, this review aims to integrate existing research on the prevalence, risk factors and protective factors related to both positive and negative mental health outcomes in this population.

Methods and analysis

The following electronic databases will be searched for publications from 1959 up to December 2025: PubMed, PsycINFO, Global Health, Embase, African Journals OnLine and African Index Medicus. The review will focus on both positive and negative mental health outcomes: positive outcomes include resilience, subjective happiness and post-traumatic growth, whereas the negative outcomes include depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance use disorder and suicidality. Peer-reviewed primary observational studies that report prevalence rates for common mental health outcomes outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition, their associated factors, as well as barriers to and facilitators of use of mental health support services among this population, will be included in the review. Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global as well as Electronic Theses and Dissertations from Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Kenya, will also be searched for grey literature. The review will be limited to publications in English or French. To assess the methodological rigour of the selected studies, the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools will be used. The synthesis will include a narrative summary and, if applicable, a meta-analysis of quantitative data depending on the extent of heterogeneity observed in the included studies. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to investigate differences in mental health outcomes by age, sex and socioeconomic position, where applicable. This systematic review will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Ethics and dissemination

This review will use secondary data and does not require ethical approval. The findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The emphasis will be on translating research findings into practical mental health interventions and HIV-specific support services for adolescents.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024568512.

❌