FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Culturally appropriate sexual health interventions for STBBI and HIV among racialised immigrant communities in Western nations: a scoping review protocol

Por: Kwame · A. · Maina · G. · Langman · E. · Ndubuka · N. · Caine · V. · Spence · C. · Maposa · S. · Kamrul · R. · Mason · N. · Etowa · J. · Eaton · A. D. · Caron-Roy · S. · Abdulrasheed · A. · Guliak · D. · Chowdhury · I. · Ahmed · A. · Nyoni · N. · Hanson · J. · Alvarez · A.
Introduction

Racialised immigrant communities in Western nations face disproportionate risks for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) due to systemic barriers, including racism, stigma and limited access to culturally appropriate care. While the need is well-established, a comprehensive synthesis of effective, culturally responsive sexual health interventions is lacking. This scoping review aims to map the available evidence on sexual health intervention needs and protective factors of racialised immigrants, and to identify and describe existing culturally appropriate programmes in Western nations.

Methods and analysis

The review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and be reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search strategy, developed and peer-reviewed by a health sciences librarian, will be executed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus, alongside grey literature sources, with no date limit. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts and full texts against the inclusion criteria. Data will be extracted using a standardised tool, analysed via narrative synthesis and framed by a socio-ecological model to categorise interventions across individual, interpersonal, community and structural levels.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, academic presentations and tailored summaries for community organisations and policy-makers to ensure practical application.

Review registration

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9qah6).

Preventing kidney injury using carbon dioxide (KID trial): trial protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Por: Saratzis · A. · Rasheed · N. · Aguirre · D. · Coughlin · P. · Diamantopoulos · A. · Bearne · L. · Selby · N. M. · Brookes · C. · Barber · S. · Richardson · C. · Gilbert · H. · Schueller · R. · Apergi · D. · Harris · K. J.
Introduction

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) commonly coexists with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with symptomatic PAD often require endovascular revascularisation to relieve pain or salvage limbs. However, the iodinated intra-arterial contrast routinely used in these procedures is nephrotoxic, placing patients with CKD at increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term renal decline. Carbon dioxide (CO2) delivered via automated injection is a potential alternative imaging contrast medium. This trial will evaluate whether using CO2 instead of iodinated contrast reduces the risk of AKI and short-term renal function decline in this high-risk group.

Methods and analysis

This is a multicentre, open-label, prospective randomised controlled trial across six secondary-care National Health Service (NHS) vascular surgery centres. A total of 174 patients with PAD and CKD undergoing endovascular intervention will be randomised 1:1 to receive iodinated contrast (standard of care) or CO2 via automated injector (Angiodroid). All perioperative care will follow local NHS protocols.

The primary outcome is log serum creatinine at 2, 30 and 90 days postprocedure. Key secondary outcomes include: incidence and severity of AKI within 48 hours postprocedure, major adverse kidney events (death, dialysis or >25% estimated glomerular filtration rate decline) by 90 days, inpatient length of stay, procedural pain, quality of life, procedural success, reinterventions, acceptability and feasibility (patient/practitioner questionnaires) of using CO2, and cost-effectiveness (healthcare resource use analysis). A mixed-methods process evaluation will be undertaken with patients and clinicians.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial has been approved by an NHS ethical review committee (24/WA/0332) and patients have been involved in trial design. Findings will be disseminated to participants, clinicians and the wider public through patient groups, lay summaries, social media, conferences, peer-reviewed journals and NHS policy channels.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN23564393.

❌