To integrate the quantitative and qualitative data collected as part of the PEACH (Procalcitonin: Evaluation of Antibiotic use in COVID-19 Hospitalised patients) study, which evaluated whether procalcitonin (PCT) testing should be used to guide antibiotic prescribing and safely reduce antibiotic use among patients admitted to acute UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.

Triangulation to integrate quantitative and qualitative data.

Four data sources in 148 NHS hospitals in England and Wales including data from 6089 patients.

A triangulation protocol was used to integrate three quantitative data sources (survey, organisation-level data and patient-level data: data sources 1, 2 and 3) and one qualitative data source (clinician interviews: data source 4) collected as part of the PEACH study. Analysis of data sources initially took place independently, and then, key findings for each data source were added to a matrix. A series of interactive discussion meetings took place with quantitative, qualitative and clinical researchers, together with patient and public involvement (PPI) representatives, to group the key findings and produce seven statements relating to the study objectives. Each statement and the key findings related to that statement were considered alongside an assessment of whether there was agreement, partial agreement, dissonance or silence across all four data sources (convergence coding). The matrix was then interpreted to produce a narrative for each statement.

To explore whether PCT testing safely reduced antibiotic use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Seven statements were produced relating to the PEACH study objective. There was agreement across all four data sources for our first key statement, ‘During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing’. The second statement was related to this key statement, ‘During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing safely reduced antibiotic prescribing’. Partial agreement was found between data sources 3 (quantitative patient-level data) and 4 (qualitative clinician interviews). There were no data regarding safety from data sources 1 or 2 (quantitative survey and organisational-level data) to contribute to this statement. For statements three and four, ‘PCT was not used as a central factor influencing antibiotic prescribing’, and ‘PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department (ED)/acute medical unit (AMU),’ there was agreement between data source 2 (organisational-level data) and data source 4 (interviews with clinicians). The remaining two data sources (survey and patient-level data) contributed no data on this statement. For statement five, ‘PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the intensive care unit (ICU)’, there was disagreement between data sources 2 and 3 (organisational-level data and patient-level data) and data source 4 (clinician interviews). Data source 1 (survey) did not provide data on this statement. We therefore assigned dissonance to this statement. For statement six, ‘There were many barriers to implementing PCT testing during the first wave of COVID-19’, there was partial agreement between data source 1 (survey) and data source 4 (clinician interviews) and no data provided by the two remaining data sources (organisational-level data and patient-level data). For statement seven, ‘Local PCT guidelines/protocols were perceived to be valuable’, only data source 4 (clinician interviews) provided data. The clinicians expressed that guidelines were valuable, but as there was no data from the other three data sources, we assigned silence to this statement.

There was agreement between all four data sources on our key finding ‘during the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing’. Data, methodological and investigator triangulation, and a transparent triangulation protocol give validity to this finding.

ISRCTN66682918.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic condition of impaired membrane electrolyte transport and is characterised by defects in the production and function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. Ground-breaking CFTR modulator therapy has resulted in a notable shift in the clinical presentation and progressive nature of CF, across both pulmonary and extrapulmonary systems. Access to CFTR modulator therapies in people with CF is occurring in a staged, descending age process, with clinical trials focusing primarily on safety and efficacy. There is a lack of robust, real-world longitudinal data on CFTR modulator therapy in infants and young children where extrapulmonary outcomes such as growth, micronutrient status and pancreatic function are the key focus.

Pancreatic, nutritional and clinical outcomes in children 0–5 years with CF during the first 2 years of CFTR modulator therapy (PaNC) is a prospective cohort study involving all eight tertiary paediatric CF centres in Australia. Infants and children 4 months to 5 years of age who are eligible for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) or ivacaftor (IVA) meet the inclusion criteria for PaNC, with a total eligible cohort of 303 children at the commencement of recruitment. The primary outcomes are change in weight-for-length/body mass index z score and change in serum micronutrient status, at 6–12 monthly intervals, during the first 2 years of treatment with ETI or IVA. Secondary outcomes include change in exocrine pancreatic function, measured by faecal elastase-1, change in the use and dose of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, nutritional and gastrointestinal therapies and change in sweat chloride levels. Linear mixed modelling will be used to analyse primary and secondary endpoints. This protocol is reported in accordance with ‘The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement’ reporting guidelines.

Overarching governance and ethics approval has been granted by Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee, in addition to all eight sites receiving site-specific authorisation approvals prior to the commencement of recruitment. Opportunities for CF consumers to be involved in targeted dissemination plans will be initiated via CF Australia at the completion of the study period. Additionally, a summary of non-identifiable results will be provided to CF consumers and CF healthcare providers via scientific and lay conferences and via peer-reviewed journals.

ACTRN12624001185550; Pre-results.

Young people (YP) whose parents have depression are at elevated risk for developing depression themselves and could benefit from preventive interventions. However, when parents are in a depressive episode, this reduces the effects of psychological interventions for depression in YP. Moreover, parental depression is often managed suboptimally in usual care. There is, therefore, a case for identifying and optimising parental depression treatment to enhance the effectiveness of psychological preventive interventions for depression in YP.

This is a randomised controlled trial (Skills for adolescent WELLbeing) to determine the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention compared with usual care in increasing the time to a major depressive episode in YP by 9-month follow-up (primary outcome). The intervention offers a 12-week treatment-optimisation phase for parents depressed at study entry, followed by randomisation of the young person to a small group manualised online CBT programme facilitated by a therapist. YP allocated to the intervention will receive eight weekly sessions plus three monthly continuation sessions. Secondary outcomes include the number of depression-free weeks, mental health symptoms and functioning. Mechanisms of intervention action will be assessed with mediation analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. Participants (parents/carers with depression and their children aged 13–19 years) will be identified through existing cohorts of adults with depression, from primary care through health boards in Wales and England, UK, schools and advertising including via social media.

The trial has received ethical approval from Wales NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) 5, the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS 305331; REC 22/WA/0254). This manuscript is based on V.5.7 of the protocol (17 January 2025). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Reports and social media messages will be used to disseminate findings to the wider public.

ISRCTN13924193 (date registered: 15 March 2023).