Conectar
Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.
The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.
We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.
The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.
The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.
Length-for-age z-scores (LAZ) and stunting prevalence (%LAZ
We simulated a synthetic cohort with a harmonically downward-shifting LAZ trajectory from birth to 24 months of age, with mean LAZs similar to the HBGDki pooled South Asian cohorts, and without any input parameters intended to differentially affect individuals’ growth across the height distribution or at different ages. We compared HBGDki empirical estimates of age interval-specific frequencies of incident stunting onset and stunting reversal with those from the synthetic cohort. Using synthetic cohorts, we examined how estimates of incident onset and reversal were affected by missing data, magnitude of the whole-population shift in the LAZ distribution and strength of the between-time-point correlation. We also compared the 3–24 month pattern of linear growth faltering expressed as age-related trajectories of average growth delay (chronological age minus height–age), mean LAZ or stunting prevalence.
Empirical estimates of age interval-specific incident stunting onset and stunting reversal in the HBGDki cohorts were similar to those observed in a synthetic cohort. Variability in LAZ threshold-crossing event rates is explained by starting LAZ, between-time-point correlation and the magnitude of the whole-population shift in the LAZ distribution. Incident stunting onset is also affected by missing data in preceding intervals. Stunting reversal occurs due to within-child variability (ie, imperfect between-time-point correlation) in the absence of any other phenomena that cause stunted children to become non-stunted at a later age. The linear growth faltering pattern based on growth delay differed from corresponding age-related trajectories of mean LAZ or stunting prevalence.
In longitudinal studies of linear growth faltering in LMICs, LAZ threshold-crossing indicators are byproducts of whole-population shifts in LAZ and within-child variability and should be interpreted accordingly. Reporting incident stunting onset and reversal rates, or analyses in which children are grouped by the timing of LAZ threshold-crossing events, may detract from efforts to understand when and why nearly all children in LMICs grow more slowly than expected for their age. Since mean LAZ and stunting prevalence are unsuitable for quantifying the rate and timing of population-average postnatal linear growth faltering, growth delay is recommended for consideration as a preferred metric.
In the UK, approximately 5.4 million adults live with asthma, of whom one in five have an uncontrolled form. Uncontrolled asthma reduces quality of life and increases healthcare use. Engaging with peers through online health communities (OHCs) can empower patients to self-manage their long-term condition. While OHCs have been in existence for several years and growing numbers of patients access them, the role of primary care in signposting patients to them has been minimal and ad hoc. We have co-developed with patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) an intervention for adult patients with asthma, consisting of an appointment with a primary care HCP to introduce online peer support and sign patients up to an established asthma OHC, followed by OHC engagement. Feasibility work found the intervention acceptable to patients and HCPs. This protocol outlines our plan to test the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
An individual randomised controlled trial will be carried out. Eligible participants will be recruited via an online survey sent to adult patients on the asthma register in 50–70 general practices in several UK locations. Participants will be invited to attend a one-off, face-to-face appointment with a primary care HCP, during which they will be individually randomised to the intervention or usual care. An asthma control test (primary outcome) and other measures of clinical effectiveness will be collected at baseline and every 3 months over a 12-month follow-up period. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to compare outcome measures between study arms. Cost-effectiveness assessment of the intervention compared with current standard of asthma management in primary care will be reported. A sample of patients and HCPs will be interviewed at study exit and the data analysed thematically.
The study was approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (reference: 25/NE/0006). Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through various means, including sharing with general practices, conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
To explore the lived experiences of intensive care nurses caring for patients with limited English proficiency.
A hermeneutic, interpretive phenomenological design was used.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with intensive care nurses recruited through purposive sampling. Data collection included Qualtrics screening surveys and semi-structured Zoom interviews. The research team, comprising linguistically diverse faculty and undergraduate research assistants, employed reflexivity techniques to minimise bias and enhance interpretive rigour. Data were analysed via inductive analysis using the hermeneutic circle.
Five main themes emerged organically from the data: Complications of Care Relating to Verbal Communication Challenges. Benefits and Barriers of Nursing Informatics in Linguistic Care. The Universal Language: Nursing Effort Builds Trust. The Ripple Effect: Chronological Considerations for Patient Care. Moving Forward: Where Do We Go From Here?
Based on these findings, a four-phase model was developed to guide individual and system-level interventions to reduce nurse moral distress and improve language equity in critical care.
Language barriers in the intensive care unit hinder communication, increase stress for patients and nurses, and impact care quality. While nurses' efforts to bridge these gaps are valued, systemic changes (such as expanded interpreter availability and improved cultural safety training) are necessary to support culturally, linguistically, and medically appropriate care.
Findings highlight the need for increased institutional support, additional resources for night-shift staff, and the integration of cultural humility education into intensive care training. The Limited English Proficiency Moral Distress Action Cycle for Critical Care Nursing, developed from this study, offers a flexible framework to guide the implementation of these improvements and reduce nurse moral distress. Future research should explore interventions to promote cultural and linguistic competence in multilingual patient populations.
Q: What problem did the study address?
A: The nurse-identified clinical, ethical, and workflow risks created when interpreters or translation tools are inadequate for critical care.
Q: What were the main findings?
A: Language barriers jeopardise teaching, informed consent, and symptom reporting. Video and phone interpreters or translation apps are vital but are often scarce, unreliable, or impersonal, particularly during night shifts. Nurses bridge these gaps by building trust through empathy, non-verbal communication, and learning key phrases. Yet, effective care for patients with limited English proficiency requires extra time, increasing workloads and fuelling moral distress related to language-discordant care. Nurses consistently called for 24/7 interpreter coverage; more reliable devices and cultural humility training must be implemented system-wide.
Q: Where and on whom will the research have an impact?
A: Findings can guide nurses, managers, leaders, and administrators to improve both language concordant and discordant nursing care and train nurses in cultural and linguistic competencies for a multilingual patient population. Ultimately, these efforts have been shown to improve the quality, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of patient care. The study also identifies moral-distress triggers and introduces the Limited English Proficiency Moral Distress Action Cycle (LEP-MDAC). This model is proposed for use in other high-acuity settings worldwide that seek to provide language-concordant or language-discordant care effectively.
SRQR.
None.
To canvas the contemporary contextual forces within the Australian residential aged care sector and argue for new research and innovation. There is a pressing need to provide systematised, high-quality and person-centred care to our ageing populations, especially for those who rely on residential care. This paper advances a warrant for establishing a new systematic framework for assessment and management that serves as a foundation for effective person-centred care delivery.
Position paper.
This paper promulgates the current dialogue among key stakeholders of quality residential aged care in Australia, including clinicians, regulatory agencies, researchers and consumers. A desktop review gathered relevant literature spanning research, standards and guidelines regarding current and future challenges in aged care in Australia.
This position paper explores the issues of improving the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia, including the lingering impact of COVID-19 and incoming reforms. It calls for nurse-led research and innovation to deliver tools to address these challenges.
The paper proposes an appropriate holistic, evidence-based nursing framework to optimise the quality and safety of residential aged care in Australia.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To examine the evolution of intensive care nurses’ roles in pharmacological haemodynamic management from 1975 to 2025 and to explore projected responsibilities through 2075.
A scholarly commentary.
A critical synthesis of literature, historical accounts and clinical guidelines spanning 1975–2025, focussing on nursing practice, technology, workforce dynamics and patient safety in critical care pharmacology.
CINAHL, PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar and major pharmacological guideline repositories were searched for sources between 1975 and 2025, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, position papers and qualitative studies.
Nurses have progressed from unstandardised vasoactive medication titration to advanced, protocol-driven multimodal vasopressor strategies. Milestones include the early catecholamine era, nurse-led sepsis protocols and contemporary adoption of peripheral vasopressor practices supported by technology. Looking ahead, intensive care nurses will increasingly supervise technologically driven titration, manage multimodal regimens, address drug shortages and sustain resilience amid workforce pressures.
Over the past five decades, nurses have transformed vasopressor management and remain essential in bridging innovation with ethical, patient-centred care. The next 50 years will require advanced decision-making, technological fluency and improved support for the nursing workforce.
Investment in simulation-based education, workforce supports and ethical frameworks is vital to prepare nurses for expanding responsibilities and ensure patient safety.
Historical variability and future challenges in nursing roles for vasopressor management.
Nurses have driven safety and innovation and will face increasing technological, ethical and workforce demands.
Relevant to critical care nurses, nurse educators, nurse leaders and policy-makers worldwide shaping the future of critical care practice.
To demonstrate, through an integrative theoretical synthesis, how fully paid parental leave functions as a boundary-management strategy that enhances nurse well-being and retention; thereby supporting sustainable workforce capacity.
Discursive paper.
Directed literature synthesis (2010–2025) across nursing, organisational psychology, labour economics and health-policy databases; thematic mapping of findings to organisational support theory, ethics-of-care theory and role theory; cross-case comparison of four national leave frameworks.
Paid, discretionary leave raises perceived organisational support and predicts lower turnover intention. Leave is framed as moral reciprocity and restores both relational energy and capacity for job satisfaction. Extended, clearly sign-posted leave reduces time- and strain-based work–family conflict, enabling role enrichment on return. Implementation rests on four structural interventions: leadership endorsement, streamlined processes, guaranteed staffing back-fill and phased return-to-work options.
Paid parental leave is a strategic, theory-grounded intervention that safeguards nurses' dual identities, amplifies organisational commitment and ultimately fortifies patient care quality.
Embedding usable, fully paid leave normalises caregiving, reduces burnout triggers and stabilises staffing to promote nurse retention, continuity of care and positive patient outcomes.
What problem did the study address? Global nurse turnover driven by unmanageable work–family conflict and inadequate leave usability.
What were the main findings? Generous, well-implemented leave improves perceived support, relational energy and retention; four structural interventions maximize the benefits of paid parental leave for nurse-parents, patients, organizations, and the nursing workforce.
Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Onurse leaders, HR policymakers and health-system executives striving to stem workforce attrition and on patient populations reliant on stable, experienced nursing teams.
None (discursive).
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The purpose of this study was to explore undergraduate nursing students' lived experiences with secondary traumatic stress.
The design was an interpretivist, hermeneutic-phenomenological approach. Data collection took place in the United States from September through November of 2024. Undergraduate nursing students who scored ≥ 38 (moderate, high, or severe) on the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale were purposively recruited for face-to-face interviews with biometric and audiovisual recordings. Data analysis followed an iterative, inductive approach using principles from Heidegger's hermeneutic approach and Benner's interpretive framework for nursing.
Four main themes emerged from the data, illuminating student lived experiences on (1) How an Event Becomes ‘Traumatic,’ (2) Maladaptive or Ineffective Coping in Response to an Event, (3) Nursing Culture as a Conduit for Secondary Traumatic Stress and (4) The Student Journey Toward Effective Coping.
Findings revealed largely unaddressed secondary traumatic stress in undergraduate nursing students, a hidden driver of burnout and early exit from the profession. During synthesis, a four-step cascade emerged: (1) an emotionally charged event, (2) experiencing distorted thoughts, (3) symptoms of physiological arousal and (4) demonstrated behavioural avoidance, intensified by an underlying professional expectation of stoicism. Although students reported using relational, spiritual, cognitive and physical coping tools, these strategies alone rarely interrupted the cascade.
Three educational imperatives follow: (1) embed explicit secondary traumatic stress literacy in educational modules, (2) normalise brief peer/faculty debriefings and (3) train preceptors to frame vulnerability as a form of competence. Trauma-informed pedagogy built on these steps can foster integrated (rather than sustained) trauma, curb attrition and help secure the future nursing workforce.
Undergraduate nursing students frequently experience secondary traumatic stress during clinical training, yet curricula and clinical cultures provide little explicit preparation or support. This gap accelerates burnout and early departure from the profession, worsening nurse shortages and threatening patient safety.
The study uncovered a four-step STS cascade: a clinical event led to distorted thoughts, which resulted in physiological arousal and produced behavioural avoidance (amplified by the hidden curriculum of stoicism misinterpreted as professional resilience). Students improvised multi-layered coping toolkits, but these alone were perceived as insufficient. Targeted, real-time interventions can interrupt the cascade and transform distress into manageable, integrated memories.
The research will influence educators, clinical mentors, and health-system managers who shape the day-to-day experiences of nursing students and new graduates, with ripple effects for patient safety and workforce sustainability across comparable healthcare contexts worldwide.
SRQR.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remain the WHO-recommended treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. However, the emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance (ART-R) threatens ACT efficacy. ART-R is phenotypically expressed as delayed parasite clearance, which can facilitate ACT partner drug resistance. ART-R has been causally linked to specific mutations in the Pfkelch13 gene.
The systematic review and associated meta-analysis aim to determine the correlation between Pfkelch13 (alleles present in the Kelch13 gene region of the P. falciparum parasite) genotypes and clinical and parasitological response to ACTs from a globally representative data set pooling individual patient data (IPD) from eligible published and unpublished studies. The eligibility criteria include Pfkelch13 genotyping results at baseline complemented by individually linked parasitological and clinical assessments following artemisinin-based treatment. The data will be curated, standardised and analysed using this proposed statistical analysis plan (SAP), adhering to PRISMA-IPD (PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Our SAP will apply hierarchical modelling to assess the effect of the P. falciparum parasite Pfkelch13 mutations on parasite clearance half-life and therapeutic efficacy across different regions. This will include study sites as random effects in the model and potential predictors such as age, sex, baseline parasite load and other potential effect modifiers as fixed effects. This analysis will enhance the understanding of the influence of Pfkelch13 mutations on malaria treatment outcomes.
Data were obtained with informed consent and ethical approvals from the relevant countries and were pseudonymised before curation in the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO)/WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) repository. Data ownership remains with contributors. This IPD meta-analysis met the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee criteria for waiving ethical review, as it is a secondary analysis of existing pseudonymised data. The resulting peer-reviewed publication and conference proceedings will help strengthen and enhance the efficiency of ART-R surveillance and response and support policy decisions.
CRD42019133366.
Thousands of patients with mental illness are admitted to acute adult mental health wards every year in England, where local guidance recommends that all mental health settings be entirely smokefree. Mental health Trusts presently invest substantial effort and resources to implement smoke-free policies and to deliver tobacco dependence treatment to patients. Providing adequate support can help those who smoke remain abstinent or quit smoking during their smoke-free inpatient stay and beyond. At present, little is known about how best to support patients to prevent their return to pre-admission smoking behaviours after discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay. We have developed an intervention which includes targeted resources to support smoking-related behaviour change in patients following discharge from a smoke-free mental health setting. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SCEPTRE intervention, compared with usual care.
This feasibility study will be an individually randomised, controlled trial in eight National Health Service mental health Trusts recruiting adults (≥18 years) admitted to an acute adult mental health inpatient setting who smoke tobacco on admission, or at any point during their inpatient stay. Consenting participants will be randomised to receive a 12-week intervention consisting of components aimed at promoting or maintaining positive smoking-related behaviour change following discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient setting or usual care. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and a second timepoint between 4 and 6 months post-randomisation. With 64 participants (32 in each group), the trial will allow a participation rate of 15% and completion rate of 80% to be estimated within a 95% CI of ±3% and ±10%, respectively. The analysis will be descriptive and follow a prespecified plan.
Ethics approval was obtained from the North West—Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee. We will share results widely through local, national and international academic, clinical and patient and public involvement networks. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and will be published on the trial website: https://sceptreresearch.com/.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for preventing disease progression. The concept of early COPD is considered to represent the initial phase of the disease course. However, different terms are used, and a standardised definition is lacking. This has hindered research and clinical utility. This systematic review aims first to examine current early COPD research and outline the definitions and terms used to help reach consensus and direct future clinical research. Second, it will identify currently proposed markers and tools for predicting the progression of early COPD and the quality of evidence to help direct future research and facilitate the development of novel management strategies.
This study will search for all clinical studies on early COPD, using a standardised search strategy, searching CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Titles and abstracts will be reviewed and compared against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stage 1 of this review will assess the terms and definitions used for early COPD. Stage 2 will assess studies presenting additional markers or tools for predicting the progression of early COPD. Study quality will be assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist for observational studies and the risk of bias (RoB) 2 tool for randomised controlled trials. This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025645320).
This systematic review will use freely available data within the literature and will not directly involve human participants; therefore, ethical approval is not required. The results of this systematic review will be prepared and submitted for presentation as conference presentation(s) and for publication as a peer-reviewed article.
CRD42025645320.
Breast cancer is a global concern, especially for women of African descent, with rising cases in Ghana. While awareness and diagnostic screening have improved, studies in Ghana and many African countries have prioritised breast self-examinations, with limited focus on mammography.
Our study explores beliefs and attitudes towards mammography screening among mothers at Teshie Community in Ghana.
The study methodology was qualitative and an exploratory design was used. Convenience sampling was used to select 30 participants until saturation was reached. Indepth, one-on-one interviews were conducted with a semistructured interview guide with probes until saturation was reached. Then data were audiotaped audiotaped, transcribed and coded. Content analysis was done to generate themes and subthemes.
Most participants, 93%, had not undergone mammography screening. Only two individuals (7%) had experienced mammography screening. The study identified two major themes: beliefs and perceptions regarding mammography, and attitudes towards mammography screening. Participants generally displayed limited knowledge of mammography screening, along with mixed attitudes and varying degrees of motivation. Notably, many participants enjoyed strong spousal support for mammography screening.
It was recommended that nurses should create awareness of mammography to increase the knowledge of women and the general population about mammography, as this is believed to increase the uptake of mammography screening.
Paediatric cervical spine injury (CSI) is uncommon but can have devastating consequences. Many children, however, present to emergency departments (EDs) for the assessment of possible CSI. While imaging can be used to determine the presence of injuries, these tests are not without risks and costs, including exposure to radiation and associated life-time cancer risks. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) to guide imaging decisions exist, although two of the existing rules, the National Emergency X-Radiography Low Risk Criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR), focus on adults and a newly developed paediatric rule from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) is yet to be externally validated. This study aims to externally validate these three CDRs in children.
This is a multicentre prospective observational study of children younger than 16 years presenting with possible CSI following blunt trauma to 1 of 14 EDs across Australia, New Zealand and Singapore. Data will be collected on presenting features (history, injury mechanism, physical examination findings) and management (diagnostic imaging, admission, interventions, outcomes). The performance accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) of three existing CDRs in identifying children with study-defined CSIs and the specific CDR defined outcomes will be determined, along with multiple secondary outcomes including CSI epidemiology, investigations and management of possible CSI.
Ethics approval for the study was received from the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee in Australia (HREC/69436/RCHM-2020) with additional approvals from the New Zealand Human and Disability Ethics Committee and the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and future management guidelines.
Registration with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry prior to the commencement of participant recruitment (ACTRN12621001050842). 50% of expected patients have been enrolled to date.
To examine the role and impact of carer involvement in rehabilitation for community-dwelling individuals with dementia, focusing on cognitive stimulation therapy, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, cognitive behavioural therapy, and exercise.
A systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis.
Five electronic databases, reference lists, and citations were searched (2017–2024), targeting primary research that reported results concerning one or more of those five focused rehabilitation interventions for people with dementia and their carers.
Results were synthesised using narrative approaches. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to appraise the quality of included studies.
Forty-one studies (12 main trials, 22 pilot studies, and 7 sub-studies) were included. While the patterns between carer involvement level and types of rehabilitation were observed, their relationship to intervention effectiveness was unclear. High carer involvement in cognitive stimulation therapy and exercise was associated with improved cognition and quality of life for people with dementia and better health-related quality of life for carers. Pilot studies showed mixed but generally positive trends, with increased depressive symptoms in carers needing further investigation. Qualitative findings highlighted social interaction and improved caregiving knowledge as key enablers to positive experiences, whereas lack of motivation was the main barrier to rehabilitation engagement.
This review identified several patterns between the level of carer involvement and intervention types. However, the mechanism underlying different involvement levels and rehabilitation success remains unclear. More rigorous research is needed to determine the relationship between carer involvement and the effects of rehabilitation interventions on supporting the independence of people with dementia.
This review enhanced the understanding of carers' roles and impacts in supporting dementia rehabilitation and possible links to optimal health outcomes.
Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline.
No patient/public contribution.
Phenomenology is essential for researchers exploring human experience. To apply it rigorously, an understanding of its philosophical foundations is needed. This discussion outlines the key distinctions between interpretive and descriptive phenomenology to illustrate philosophical and methodological implications. Nursing researchers seeking to either uncover universal essences or interpret deeper, contextually situated meanings in lived experiences may find this discussion instructive.
Phenomenology examines lived experiences, focusing on interpretation and meaning. The question of understanding follows either an epistemological (descriptive) or ontological (interpretive) line of questioning. Husserl's descriptive approach seeks to objectively capture the essence of experiences through bracketing, while Heidegger's interpretive approach emphasises co-constructed meaning, shaped by researcher and participant.
In phenomenological studies, researchers use various qualitative data types to uncover the essence of participants' lived experiences. Common methods include in-depth interviews, focus groups, and written narratives, along with artefacts like photographs or journals, and audio-visual materials that capture personal reflections. Researchers may also use observations, field notes, and digital content, ensuring a comprehensive view of participants' perceptions and emotions.
Descriptive phenomenology values authenticity through emphasis on objectivity, using methods like Giorgi's analysis, while interpretive phenomenology values co-creation of meaning, employing Heidegger's hermeneutic circle for deeper contextual meaning. The choice of approach depends on the research aims.
Descriptive phenomenology helps identify universal themes in patient care, whereas interpretive phenomenology uncovers significant subtle meanings in complex experiences. Nursing researchers should select approaches aligned with their study objectives.
Both methodologies offer valuable insights into nursing research. A clear understanding of their foundations helps researchers choose methods that best suit their research goals.
FreshRSS 