Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common paediatric spinal deformity with large curves surgically managed through spinal fusion. However, postoperative rehabilitation remains inconsistent and varies depending on clinician, hospital or location. Our international e-Delphi consensus established a broad range of statements from preoperative care until 12 months postoperatively. However, rehabilitation and graded return to sport between 3 and 12 months remains vague and further consensus work is needed. This study aims to understand the intermediate and late stages of rehabilitation in order to guide return to sport, exercise and physical activity. The primary objective is to explore content of rehabilitation and milestones between 3 and 12 months postoperatively. This understanding of postoperative care will form the basis for future postoperative guidance.

This protocol for a nominal group technique (NGT) study is written in accordance with the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document guidelines. A national sample of expert surgeons, physiotherapists and nurses in AIS will be recruited. The NGT will take place virtually and will consist of six stages: stage 1: idea generation; stage 2: round robin idea sharing; stage 3: discussion and clarification; stage 4: anonymous voting; stage 5: results feedback; and stage 6: discussion and final voting. This NGT will be preceded by a scoping review which will be disseminated a priori to inform stage 1 idea generation. The population, concept, context framework will be used to explore postoperative rehabilitation towards sports, exercise or physical activities following any kind of spinal surgery. The study steering group and patient and public involvement representative have been involved from conceptualisation and will continue to be involved until final dissemination.

The University of Birmingham has provided ethical approval: ERN_4201-Jun2025. Dissemination will take place through conference presentation and peer-reviewed publications.

Genomic diagnostics have accelerated therapeutic and preventative breakthroughs in oncology and cancer genetics. Despite increased access, the implementation of genomics-based care faces serious fragmentation and scalability issues due to a lack of system support. The Precision Care Initiative aims to develop a novel and scalable Precision Care Clinic (PCC). It is designed to coordinate precision medicine in oncology and streamline decision support for referring oncologists and geneticists. The PCC will enhance quality of care through multifaceted, patient-centred communication. It will also improve translational capacity by integrating team expertise in precision oncology, implementation science, clinical informatics, cancer genetics, health economics and patient-reported measures.

This programme uses a type I and type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial design sequentially. The complex clinical intervention is precision oncology—matching the targeted treatment or risk management strategy to the right patient, based on their genomic, cancer staging, environmental, lifestyle and biological characteristics, etc. The service intervention is the PCC, providing centralised multidisciplinary review to facilitate shared decision-making with clinicians for the provision of optimal precision oncology care for their patients. The implementation intervention is the co-designed implementation platform—applying evidence-based implementation approaches and Learning Health System principles to enhance feasibility and sustainability. All adult patients across Australia referred to the PCC (n=est. 100–150/year), and healthcare professional interest holders involved in the delivery of precision oncology services, are eligible to participate. Over the study course, phase I involves using a mixed-methods approach to inform iterative co-design and pilot testing of the first PCC with an accompanying implementation platform, and a suite of outcome measures to assess effectiveness; phase II (hybrid type I) includes the implementation of the PCC and evaluation of the outcome measures designed in phase I; phase III (hybrid type II) involves a co-design of local adaptations and testing the effectiveness of the PCC model nationally.

The study received ethical approval from the St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00373). Study results will be presented at relevant conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT06077110

This study explored how Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are being undertaken and the challenges to their successful implementation and sustainability.

A cross-sectional mixed methods online survey.

Primary care in England.

120 clinical pharmacists with experience in conducting SMRs in primary care.

Survey responses were received from clinical pharmacists working in 15 different regions. The majority were independent prescribers (62%, n=74), and most were employed by Primary Care Networks (65%, n=78), delivering SMRs for one or more general practices. 61% (n=73) had completed, or were currently enrolled in, the approved training pathway. Patient selection was largely driven by the primary care contract specification: care home residents, patients with polypharmacy, patients on medicines commonly associated with medication errors, patients with severe frailty and/or patients using potentially addictive pain management medication. Only 26% (n=36) of respondents reported providing patients with information in advance. The majority of SMRs were undertaken remotely by telephone and were 21–30 min in length. Much variation was reported in approaches to conducting SMRs, with SMRs in care homes being deemed the most challenging due to additional complexities involved. Challenges included not having sufficient time to prepare adequately, address complex polypharmacy and complete follow-up work generated by SMRs, issues relating to organisational support, competing national priorities and lack of ‘buy-in’ from some patients and General Practitioners.

These results offer insights into the role being played by the clinical pharmacy workforce in a new country-wide initiative to improve the quality and safety of care for patients taking multiple medicines. Better patient preparation and trust, alongside continuing professional development, more support and oversight for clinical pharmacists conducting SMRs, could lead to more efficient medication reviews. However, a formal evaluation of the potential of SMRs to optimise safe medicines use for patients in England is now warranted.

Doxycycline postexposure prophylaxis (doxy-PEP) can prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). STI rates are high among MSM and TGW in China, and implementation strategies are needed to optimise doxy-PEP services. Pay-it-forward and social network distribution approaches may increase uptake of STI services and could increase the uptake of doxy-PEP. We present the protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of pay-it-forward strategies with and without adjunctive social network distribution among MSM and TGW in China.

A total of 399 MSM and TGW will be recruited at seven sites in China and randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to (1) self-pay, (2) pay-it-forward alone or (3) pay-it-forward with adjunctive social network distribution of doxy-PEP. Participants assigned to the self-pay arm can purchase a doxy-PEP packet out-of-pocket. Participants in the pay-it-forward arm will be offered a free doxy-PEP packet and the opportunity to donate to support doxy-PEP for future participants. Participants in the pay-it-forward arm with social network distribution will receive the pay-it-forward intervention as well as additional free doxy-PEP packets to distribute to peers. Those randomised to the self-pay and the pay-it-forward with social network distribution arms (ie, index participants) will receive and distribute referral cards to recruit additional peers (ie, alter participants). Alter participants recruited through the control arm will be referred to the clinic to purchase doxy-PEP. Alter participants recruited through the pay-it-forward with adjunctive social network distribution arm will receive doxy-PEP directly from referring index participants. Both index and alter participants in each arm will be asked to complete a follow-up survey 3 and 6 months after enrolment. The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants who report using doxy-PEP within 72-hours of condomless anal or oral sex on one or more occasions during follow-up.

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics review committee of the Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University (Approval number: 2023109). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

The study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (trial ID ChiCTR2300074903). Date of registration: 18 August 2023.