Conectar
The purpose of this scoping review is to map and summarise the current peer-reviewed literature on inequities in doctoral nursing education, with a specific focus on populations affected, barriers, facilitators and strategies to support equity in doctoral nursing education.
This scoping review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
A comprehensive search for empirical evidence was completed using four databases: CINAHL, Scopus, ERIC and Google Scholar. A systematic screening process was applied, and data were extracted and charted guided by the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework.
Databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025.
A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies focused on racial/ethnic minoritized populations, and one focused on first-generation doctoral students. Common barriers included experiences of microaggression, systemic racism, lack of funding and feelings of isolation. Common facilitators were faculty mentorship, financial support, peer networks and targeted recruitment programs.
Inequities remain in doctoral nursing education, particularly for racial/ethnic minoritized populations. Although some effective interventions were identified, significant gaps exist in understanding how to support diverse doctoral nursing students, especially for those with intersecting identities.
Addressing inequities in doctoral nursing education can enhance the diversity of the nursing workforce and faculty, promote inclusive academic environments and contribute to health equity.
Persistent inequities in access and experience among underrepresented groups in doctoral nursing education. Main findings: Key structural and social barriers persist, though several promising strategies have emerged. Impact area: Academic institutions, doctoral program designers and nurse leaders.
This study adheres to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. This study did not involve patients or the public in its design, conduct or reporting.
Stroke nurses must perform dysphagia screening on all suspected stroke patients, adhering to best practice guidelines. While comprehensive training is essential for safe and competent screening, the variability in dysphagia screening tools leads to significant differences in education.
This scoping review aims to collate and report what education is provided to stroke nurses on the use of dysphagia screening tools.
A scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist.
A systematic review of three electronic databases identified 318 peer-reviewed studies. After screening and eligibility assessment in COVIDENCE, 10 studies were included. Data from these studies was analysed using Arksey and O'Malley's thematic framework.
MEDLINE, CINHAL, Scopus.
Ten studies were included in this review which yielded the following major themes: (1) comprehensive and structured training; (2) diversity of training methods; (3) ongoing education and competency assessment; and (4) standardised protocols and tools.
Offering comprehensive training programs to stroke nurses on dysphagia screening tools is associated with more timely interventions and improved outcomes; however inconsistent approaches to training make it difficult to benchmark outcomes of the education provided. Future research should explore stroke nurses' experiences with current training to guide future training program development.
This review highlights the importance of training stroke nurses to use dysphagia screening tools to improve patient outcomes.
No patient or public contribution.
There is an increased focus on healthcare workers' bullying due to various individual, organisational, and social factors that may elevate the risk of bullying among healthcare employees. This scoping review aims to identify knowledge gaps regarding the theorising of bullying and the prevention and management of bullying in healthcare settings.
A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted using PRISMA guidelines.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (N = 18) involving healthcare workers (i.e., doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals) were identified through a vigorous search of ProQuest Central, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Scopus, PsycINFO (PsycNet), and Web of Science databases.
The included reviews were explored to identify theoretical explanations of bullying and strategies for bullying prevention and management. Thematic analysis was applied to synthesise findings.
The results indicated that workplace culture, hierarchy within healthcare organisations, inactive institutional power, and conflict are key theoretical constructs that may explain bullying among healthcare workers. Further, a comprehensive approach of individual and organisational-level factors, involving organisational policies and procedures, creating awareness to promote effective reporting of bullying, and the role of leaders and managers, was identified as critical for preventing and managing bullying.
The scoping review emphasises the need for integrating theoretical frameworks that consider both individual and systemic aspects of bullying in healthcare organisations. Addressing these aspects can improve the effectiveness of strategies for bullying prevention and management.
Understanding the theoretical approaches to explain bullying of healthcare employees can provide a concrete foundation for targeted interventions and organisational policies that address bullying at multiple levels, therefore improving healthcare workers' wellbeing and workplace culture.
No direct patient or public contribution was related to the scoping review.
To summarise current research that defines cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to provide a succinct conceptual definition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Scoping review using JBI guidelines to develop the study protocol.
The most recent (2024) research papers on cardiopulmonary resuscitation were evaluated for inclusion. Individual definitions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation extracted from 25 papers were summarised and then analysed to conceptualise a single definition for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
CINAHL, Medline and Scopus databases were evaluated for inclusion.
Definitions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation focused on interventions, mainly chest compressions and ventilation. Defibrillation was inconsistently included. There was less emphasis on criteria for initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation and desired outcomes.
This scoping review found limited consensus between definitions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Analysis of the range of perspectives found in the review enabled the researchers to propose definitions in three areas: cardiopulmonary resuscitation, basic life support and advanced life support.
Nurses working in hospitals and responding to cardiac arrests are guided by Advanced Resuscitation Plans and Do Not Resuscitate orders. In turn, these documents should communicate a clear definition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in policies, procedures and standards. This is important for clinical nurses to ensure patients' consent for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation is informed.
Currently cardiopulmonary resuscitation is inconsistently defined. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation includes compressions and ventilation. A standardised definition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation supports professional nursing practice and has wider implications for patient consent and research practice.
This scoping review adheres to and is reported according to PRISMA-ScR.
No patient or public contribution.
To provide an overview of the challenges that Intensive Care Unit nurses experience during the organ donation process and identify recommended support models or strategies that may assist them when caring for potential organ donors and their families during the organ donation process.
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methods.
Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via OVID), APA PsycINFO (via OVID), Scopus, OVID Emcare, Web of Science and CINAHL (via EBSCO) were searched from the first available start date of the individual database to December 2023.
Eligible studies included peer-reviewed empirical quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies exploring the challenges experienced by Intensive Care Unit nurses during the organ donation process in adult intensive or critical care settings. Reviewers used Rayyan systematic review software to screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Data were gathered using an adapted JBI data extraction tool for scoping reviews.
Twenty-eight papers were included that were published between 1983 and 2023. Most studies (71.4%) used a qualitative approach. Seven key challenges were identified: direct patient care, care for the next of kin, concept of brainstem death, ethical challenges, emotional challenges, challenges around communication and organisational challenges. Several support models were identified including debriefing, training and education, and availability of local or national protocols and guidelines for organ donation.
This scoping review provides an increased understanding of the challenges that Intensive Care Unit nurses experience during the organ donation process. Appropriate support models or strategies may potentially improve nurses' care experience during the organ donation process.
Improved understanding of the nature of challenges during the organ donation process can facilitate the implementation of supportive strategies that may ultimately improve quality of care, consent rates and nurses' and donors' family experiences.
A public representative with family experience of organ donation was involved in developing the protocol and search strategy.
To explore existing research regarding how nurses' unclear responsibilities influence their professional role development in hospital settings.
A scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley.
The Population Exposure Outcome framework was used to identify eligible inclusion and exclusion criteria and search terms. The included articles have been thematically analysed in guidance by Braun and Clarke.
Twenty-six studies conducted between 2016 and 2024 were identified in CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus.
The roles of nurses were highly adaptable within hospital settings and healthcare teams, requiring nurses to assess both organisational shortcomings and colleagues' needs. These assessments depended on the nurses' competence and motivation for professional growth.
There was a clear need to strengthen organisational structures and frameworks to support the evolving role of nurses. Basic nursing education must be better at preparing nurses for their upcoming leadership role.
Increasing complexity and unclear responsibilities contribute to role ambiguity among nurses. The review highlights the importance of recognising nurses as visible and accountable leaders. There is also a need to support nurses' adaptability through improved basic education, which may have implications for both clinical practice and education.
The PRISMA Scoping Review checklist was used during the review process. The PRISMA flowchart was used to report the database searches.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore what content, teaching and learning activities are advocated by nurse educators to mitigate moral distress and related concepts in student nurses.
Scoping review.
The review was conducted according to Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The search strategy adopted their three-step method for systematic reviews. The eligibility criteria reflected the Population, Concept, Context format.
CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE Full Text, APA PsycINFO, Education Research Complete, Web of Science, ProQuest, Base, and Open Grey were systematically searched in September 2024 for papers in English language regardless of publication age.
Following searches, 3809 records were screened against eligibility criteria, resulting in 42 eligible papers being included; 29 research studies and 13 non-empirical papers. We identified 236 content suggestions, mapped to 70 subject codes. Also, 217 teaching and learning activities are suggested and mapped to 41 coded activities. Data is charted in tables and figures and results are discussed per related concept of moral distress.
Educational content, and teaching and learning activities are heterogenous across the concepts influencing moral distress. There is overlap of content across different concepts. Moral sensitivity received the most publications. Development of research and educational strategies addressing other interrelated concepts would be advantageous for evidence-based curriculum development. Recommendations are made to develop evidence-based content and teaching and learning activities.
Recommendations are made to develop an evidence-based multi-conceptual curriculum to mitigate moral distress in pre-registration student nurses.
Recommendations are made adding to existing research agendas on the topic.
PRISMA-ScR.
No patient or public contribution.
To summarise the type of medication administration errors associated with nurse staffing and workload, and identify how nurse staffing, workload and medication administration data were measured and captured in existing studies.
A scoping review.
We conducted a literature search across four electronic databases, including Embase, CINAHL, Ovid Medline and Scopus, from inception to June 2024. The search was limited to articles published in English and primary studies examining nurse staffing, workload and medication administration errors in hospital settings.
Of the 1141 articles retrieved, 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted using a Cohort (n = 15) or Cross-sectional (n = 16) study design. Most studies (n = 21) used self-reported data to evaluate nurse staffing, workload and medication administration errors. We found limited studies used objective data sources, such as barcode medication administration (BCMA) systems (n = 5) and electronic staffing systems (n = 5), to assess the impact of staffing on medication errors involving the administration of time-critical medications. There was a fair amount of heterogeneity in how nursing workload and medication administration errors were measured and analysed, complicating nurse leaders' ability to allocate staffing resources that meet the patient's needs.
This review found a heavy reliance on self-reported data across different study designs. While self-reported data offer valuable insights, the emerging use of objective data sources, such as BCMA, can minimise bias and capture more nuances in administration errors during high-demand periods.
The review highlights the emerging use of real-world data to examine the influence of nurse staffing and workload on medication administration errors. As nursing care becomes increasingly complex, future studies utilising subjective and objective data sources can assist nurse leaders in making informed, data-driven staffing decisions to reduce medication errors.
The review followed the PRISMA-Scr reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify interventions and strategies to prevent patient- and visitor-perpetrated violence against nurses working in acute hospital Emergency Departments. Design Scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL to identify relevant studies published up to June 2024. The review included primary research studies employing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches. Eligibility criteria focused on interventions aimed at preventing physical and verbal violence in acute hospital emergency settings, explicitly targeting nurses. The selection process followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with independent screening and data extraction by two reviewer pairs. Data Sources PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published up to June 2024.
A total of 40 studies were included, covering interventions across 11 countries, mostly from the United States. Interventions were categorised as organisational, environmental, or individual-focused. Training programs were the most common strategy, followed by risk assessment tools, defense strategies, multidisciplinary briefings, and technology-assisted interventions. Most interventions (73%) were implemented before violent incidents, 23% during, and 5% after. Healthcare workers, particularly nurses, were the primary target group, highlighting the need for effective preventive strategies.
Violence prevention interventions in Emergency Departments focus on pre-incident strategies, mainly organisational and individual-focused. Limited attention has been given to environmental interventions despite their role in mitigating workplace violence. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of these strategies.
Addressing workplace violence in EDs ensures a safer work environment, improves staff retention, and enhances patient care quality.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To examine the role of nurses in providing post-treatment follow-up care to breast cancer survivors, and to assess the impact of this care on survivors' satisfaction.
Scoping review.
An electronic literature search from PubMed and CINAHL databases was conducted, covering the period from 2013 to November 2023.
Twenty-seven articles were included in this review, highlighting key areas in which nurses play essential roles in the provision of post-treatment care for breast cancer survivors. The identified nursing roles include the surveillance and early detection of relapses, the assessment and support of self-management for late physical and psychosocial effects of cancer, health promotion and care coordination. Regarding satisfaction, survivors reported high overall satisfaction with nursing care. However, satisfaction levels varied with regard to specific needs, particularly in managing the fear of recurrence.
Nurses play a fundamental role in delivering post-treatment care to breast cancer survivors. However, evidence regarding their specific contributions and survivors' satisfaction with long-term care remains limited, underscoring the need for further research to enhance care during the long-term survivorship phase.
Consolidating the diverse roles of nurses in post-treatment care into a unified framework could support comprehensive and personalised care, addressing unmet needs. Evaluating patient satisfaction with nursing follow-up helps identify effective interventions and areas for improvement in future research.
This review analyses the diverse roles of nurses in the follow-up care of breast cancer survivors and highlights the impact of nursing care on patient satisfaction.
This study adhered to the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines.
No patient or public contribution.
To synthesise the application, construction methods, challenges, and optimisation strategies of Patient Journey Maps (PJMs) in care transitions.
A scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework and PRISMA-ScR.
Nine databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, etc., searched from January 2015 to March 2025.
Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracting data from 23 studies across 12 countries, synthesised via descriptive and thematic analyses informed by nursing theories.
PJMs targeted elderly, children/adolescents, and special-needs populations across in-hospital referrals, inter-hospital transitions, and community adaptation. PJMs development integrated qualitative (interviews, co-design) and quantitative (process mining, EHR analysis) methods to map stages, touchpoints, and emotional curves. Challenges included collaboration breakdowns (78.3%), information fragmentation (74.0%), and psychosocial barriers (47.8%). Optimization strategies emphasised interdisciplinary collaboration, standardised processes, technology enablement, and patient-centred interventions.
PJMs enhance care transitions by visualising patient experiences and systemic gaps, improving continuity and safety. Scalability requires addressing technological adaptation, policy alignment and resource equity. Future research should prioritise dynamic, digitally driven PJM tools and cross-regional collaboration for health equity.
This review informs clinical practice and policy by bridging theoretical and practical gaps in transitional care via interdisciplinary strategies and technology integration.
Advances global nursing practice with patient-centered strategies, promotes health equity through collaboration, and informs policy and digital innovation for dynamic care transitions.
None.
Not registered.
The aim of this scoping review was to identify factors associated with delayed initiation of end-of-life care for adult patients with cardiovascular disease in critical care settings.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was designed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Included articles were uploaded and examined in Covidence.
A systematic search of bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Medline and Embase) and Google Scholar was performed to identify relevant literature between January 2003 and April 2025. Key search concepts included ‘end of life’, ‘cardiac’ and ‘critical care’.
A total of 9430 articles were initially identified. After removing 7750 irrelevant articles, 207 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 34 articles were included in the final review. Four major themes were identified: (1) confidence in communication regarding end of life; (2) transition from active therapies to end-of-life care; (3) role clarity in the initiation and provision of end-of-life care; and (4) breakdown in the shared decision-making process.
Delayed initiation of end-of-life care for patients with cardiovascular disease in critical care settings could be mitigated through training to improve confidence when discussing end of life with patients and families, and utilisation of prognostic prediction assessment tools. Increased focus on inter-professional collaboration and shared decision-making in family meetings may reduce indecision at end of life.
The results were reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To systematically map evidence on the application of AI systems in nursing workforce management, with a targeted focus on the role of nurse leaders.
A scoping review.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across six databases: CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies published in English between January 2015 and December 2024 were included.
Studies that focused on AI in the context of nursing leadership or workforce management were included, while those examining AI in healthcare but without a specific focus on nursing leadership/management were excluded.
A total of 1014 articles were retrieved, and 12 were included in this review. Eleven articles were published between 2022 and 2024. The findings show that AI systems in nursing management have been applied in several domains, including workforce planning, nursing safety, and staff prediction models. Although studies highlight the positive optimising potential of AI systems, others underscore the ethical implications of AI with respect to nursing leadership and management, particularly regarding discriminatory stereotypes in AI-generated nurse imagery and the critical role of nurse leaders in ethical AI integration in care. Only one study identified important barriers to AI integration, underlining the need for enhanced AI training for nurse managers.
Findings suggests that the application of AI systems in nursing leadership/management is in its early phases, with limited engagement of nurses in innovating and implementing AI-enabled systems. A substantial problem related to AI adoption remains—AI integration hinges on addressing the readiness and engagement levels of nurse leaders early on in the process of AI systems' innovation. To promote AI integration, AI competency, trust, and optimisation in healthcare, developing a basic working understanding of AI together with a culture of multidisciplinary AI development teams that include nurses are potentially proactive strategies.
This study adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
To identify research gaps by mapping what is known about the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students identifying signs of suicidal distress in healthcare consumers and providing clear pathways of support.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five stage framework and the Levec et al. (2010) extensions of this framework.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete and Ovid MEDLINE databases were searched to identify relevant articles, keywords and search terms to inform the full search strategy for CINAHL. This search strategy was then adapted for Scopus, PsychInfo, Emcare, Medline and ERIC, searched in November 2024.
Studies eligible for inclusion (N = 28) represented research from 14 countries; most (53.5%, n = 15) used a quantitative design, 11 (39.3%) were qualitative and two (7.1%) used a mixed-methods design. Barriers found from the scoping review included a low level of knowledge of suicidality, stigma preventing students from assessing and acting on suicidal ideation, and a lack of confidence in providing care to healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers included lived experience, exposure to individuals expressing suicidal ideation and education, simulation and role play. This review also contributes to the existing literature about the relationship of nursing to existing suicide prevention frameworks and suggests revision of these frameworks to address staff attitudes and beliefs, as well as lived and living experience.
Nurses are ideally placed to assess and respond to suicidality among healthcare consumers, and preparation should begin during pre-registration studies. Our scoping review indicates that further research work is needed to address the barriers to working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality and to enhance the enablers to provide safe care.
Addressing the barriers and enablers to pre-registration nursing students providing safe care for healthcare consumers expressing suicidality is essential. Further research is required to address the barriers and enhance the enablers identified in this scoping review.
What problem did the study address? This scoping review summarised the literature on pre-registration student ability to work with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality, identifying barriers and enablers. What were the main findings? Barriers include poor knowledge of suicidality, stigma, fear and a lack of confidence in working with healthcare consumers expressing suicidality. Enablers include lived experience, exposure to clinical settings where healthcare consumers express suicidality and simulation and education. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The research will have an impact on providers of pre-registration nursing degrees, where the inclusion of content addressing suicidality and exposure to settings where individuals express suicidal ideation is shown to improve attitudes and knowledge of suicidality assessment.
PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
This study aimed to describe the types of psychological and physical symptoms experienced by healthcare professionals who became second victims after a patient safety incident and the impact of the incident on their social and professional lives.
Scoping review.
JBI methodology for scoping reviews and PRISMA-ScR for reporting were followed.
The search was conducted on June 13, 2024, using the CINAHL (EBSCO), Scopus, PubMed (Medline), Medic and PsycInfo (EBSCO) databases. A grey literature search was also conducted.
A total of 96 papers were included. Healthcare professionals experienced psychological symptoms such as anger, sadness and guilt after a safety incident. Physical symptoms were reported, including symptoms related to sleep and gastrointestinal symptoms. At the professional and social levels, the incident affected their work, relationships and well-being. Positive impacts were also noted.
This study provides a comprehensive overview of healthcare professionals' experiences after safety incidents. In addition, this study also captured the positive impacts of safety incidents, such as learning from mistakes.
By recognising the symptoms and impacts associated with the second victim syndrome, appropriate support can be provided for healthcare professionals.
The findings of this study can be used to identify the relevant harm to professionals after a safety incident, which could help to improve the well-being of these workers.
No patient or public contribution.
Open Science Framework, https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-5cdmu-v1
Although healthcare infrastructure has improved in recent years, the preoperative journey of patients is often accompanied by anxiety. Allowing patients to walk to the operating theatre is a simple, yet underexplored strategy that may enhance their sense of autonomy and reduce anxiety. As patient-centred care gains importance, evaluating the effects of this approach on patient-reported outcomes may be more relevant than widely assumed.
In this scoping review, we aim to analyse the published literature on preoperative walking into the operating theatre and patient-reported outcomes, such as anxiety and satisfaction.
This study was a scoping review that followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review extension guidelines.
Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing elective surgery and walking to the operating theatre. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and critical appraisal was performed by using ROBINS-I V2.0, RoB2 and ROB-E tools.
Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases (OVID) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) were searched up to 31st January 2025.
Our search identified 958 articles, with seven trials included in the final analysis. The studies, published between 1994 and 2022, involved 3001 patients from North America, Asia and Europe. The interventions varied, but most patients reported improved satisfaction and reduced anxiety when walking to the operating theatre. No adverse events were reported, although patient preferences varied, with younger patients more likely to prefer walking.
Walking to the theatre positively impacts patient satisfaction and autonomy. However, patient selection is key, as not all individuals are physically or mentally prepared for walking. Future research could explore unaccompanied walking and its effects on hospital resource utilisation. Preoperative walking is a beneficial intervention that enhances patient satisfaction and reduces anxiety, providing a feasible alternative to bed transport for many elective surgical patients.
No patient or public involvement.
To systematically summarise evidence related to the use of non-sterile gloves when preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials.
Scoping review.
A rigorous scoping review was undertaken following Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework and the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review guidelines (2018). Five databases and grey literature were included in the search. Literature published between 2009 and 2024 was included.
Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science) and the grey literature were searched in February 2024.
Three studies were included; however, none directly addressed correct non-sterile glove use during intravenous antimicrobial preparation or administration in clinical practice.
We found no evidence to support the use of non-sterile gloves in intravenous antimicrobial preparation. There is an urgent need for rigorous research to inform the development of clear guidelines on non-sterile glove use to underpin evidence-based decision-making in nursing and other health professional education, improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
Inappropriate use of non-sterile gloves for preparing and administering intravenous antimicrobials hinders correct hand hygiene practices and increases healthcare-associated infections, healthcare costs and waste.
A critical gap in the existing evidence was a key finding of this review, highlighting the urgency for evidence-based guidelines to improve patient safety outcomes, reduce healthcare costs and promote environmental sustainability in healthcare.
This scoping review adhered to the relevant EQUATOR guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The protocol was registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QY4J2).
To explore the barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of strategies that have been implemented to improve the experience of cultural safety for First Nations inpatients in the Australian hospital setting.
Scoping review.
Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and reported using PRISMA-ScR, six databases were searched with data extracted and synthesised.
Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Emcare, Informit, Medline, ProQuest and Scopus databases. Searches were undertaken in March 2024.
Forty-three articles representing 39 studies were included. Strategies were categorised as governance, service delivery, hospital environment, clinician education, and First Nations workforce. First Nations researchers were co-authors in most studies, and emergent themes were grounded in First Nations priorities, with an emphasis on developing the First Nations health workforce. Findings included (i) First Nations health staff being identified as cultural brokers between First Nations patients and non-First Nations clinicians; (ii) experiences of cultural safety being amplified when First Nations and non-First Nations health staff worked together; and (iii) strong governance being critical to addressing institutional racism and enabling cultural safety.
Embedding the voice of First Nations peoples in governance and an organisational commitment to strengthening the First Nations workforce are essential drivers for implementing cultural safety strategies in Australian hospitals.
Working together respectfully and collaboratively offers a pathway forward for First Nations and non-First Nations health service clinicians and management to deliver culturally safe hospital care.
Culturally safe hospital care is integral to promoting the health of First Nations people. This study maps cultural safety strategies used in the Australian inpatient hospital setting, explores if and how these strategies have improved cultural safety and identifies barriers and facilitators to implementation. Fostering approaches to support understanding and respect between First Nations and non-First Nations clinicians and staff is integral to promoting culturally safe hospital care. Hospital leadership, policymakers and staff can benefit from understanding the drivers of culturally safe hospital care.
Reported using PRISMA-ScR.
Guidance on this research was received from Aboriginal leaders at the first author's hospital workplace.
A research protocol was prepared in advance and registered: https://osf.io/sfzby/?view_only=03c2349ebdae4a7ba95a621d9b7e8bc4.
Investing in advanced nursing roles (AN) in social care is a strategic priority to address workforce challenges, create new career pathways, improve outcomes and future-proof the sector. However, there is limited understanding of these roles globally. This systematic scoping review maps the international presence and impact of post-qualification advanced practice roles for registered nurses (RNs) working in care homes and charitable organisations.
This review was conducted following the methodology established by the JBI and adhered to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews checklist.
Studies were included if (1) they included RNs working in care homes, charities or not-for-profit health centres, (2) the RN was in a specialist, enhanced or advanced practice role and (3) if role details were provided. Studies were limited to those published in the English language between 2014 and 2024. Evidence was gathered from a comprehensive search of electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science), grey literature, relevant webpages, and reference lists. Expert consultations were also conducted. Eligible full texts were reviewed in Covidence software by two independent researchers.
The search yielded 575 records, and 89 were taken forward for full-text screening. A total of 20 met the inclusion criteria: 19 were concerned with AN roles in care homes, and one focused on a charitable organisation. The majority of these studies (n = 12) were conducted in North America.
The literature on AN roles in care homes and charitable organisations is notably sparse. Despite this, the available evidence highlights substantial benefits, including improved care quality, enhanced resident outcomes and positive impacts on team dynamics. This review identifies four key themes: scope of practice, positive impacts, influencing factors and barriers, which provide a framework for policymakers, healthcare leaders and educators to optimise the contributions of this group within the evolving global social care sector.
Not undertaken because of the nature of scoping reviews.
This review highlights the crucial role of advanced nurses in enhancing care quality, resident outcomes, and workforce sustainability in care homes and charitable organisations. The findings provide direction for policymakers and health and social care leaders to further develop the role of nursing in social care settings globally.
To map existing sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research in Ireland, identify gaps in literature and outline priorities for future research and healthcare. SGM is an umbrella term that includes people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or intersex and is sometimes abbreviated as LGBTQI+.
A scoping review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2024.
The review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines and PRISMA-ScR framework for scoping reviews. Articles were identified through systematic database searches and screened independently by reviewers.
PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2014 and April 2024. Sixty studies met inclusion criteria.
The review highlighted a disproportionate focus on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM), particularly regarding HIV and sexual health. Mental health research revealed high levels of anxiety, depression and suicidality, largely attributed to minority stress and systemic discrimination. Transgender health studies documented barriers to accessing gender-affirming care and mental health services. Few studies explored experiences of sexual minority women, older SGM individuals or intersex people. Intersectional perspectives on race, disability and socio-economic status were notably absent.
SGM health research in Ireland reflects significant progress in documenting disparities in mental and sexual health. However, there is a lack of representation for some groups. There is also limited attention to intersectionality. Systematic gaps in sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data impede targeted policymaking and service delivery.
Findings underscore the need for inclusive, culturally competent healthcare services, better integration of SGM health topics into nursing education, and community-centred interventions. Addressing structural barriers and improving provider competence can enhance equitable healthcare access for SGM populations.
This review addresses the fragmented state of SGM health research in Ireland, highlighting gaps in representation and systemic issues.
Authorship includes individuals from various sexual and gender minority communities.
FreshRSS 