Conectar
Although implementing evidence-based interventions has been shown to improve the quality of care, there is limited evidence evaluating how these interventions are implemented. In intensive care settings, the use of evidence-based protocols, guidelines and care bundles has been associated with enhanced care quality and reduced burden on patients.
To identify and map existing evidence on the evaluation of evidence-based intervention implementation in adults' intensive care.
A scoping review was conducted by including original published and unpublished studies in English and Finnish.
The studies were retrieved from five databases (CINAHL, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Medic ja Mednar) from January 2000 to December 2024. The data search was performed on 29 November 2022 and updated on 10 December 2024. The results were synthesized and presented in a tabular and descriptive form.
A total of 19 studies were included in the review. These studies evaluated the implementation of evidence-based interventions, focusing on nurse and patient outcomes. Nurse outcomes included measures such as compliance, knowledge and self-confidence. Patient outcomes included indicators such as body temperature, blood glucose, incidence of pressure ulcers and length of stay.
The evaluation of evidence-based intervention implementation does not consistently extend to the evaluation of the entire implementation process. More consistent research reporting would improve disseminating the evidence. The evaluation implementation makes it possible to show the impact of nurse and patient outcomes. The evaluation results can reveal the success of the implementation. Further research on evaluation implementation, development of systematic and comprehensive evaluation implementation methods, or evaluation matrix is needed.
The review will be useful for nursing professionals in planning evidence of implementation, developing or researching evaluation implementation. Promoting evaluation of evidence-based intervention implementation in Nursing can improve the quality of patient care, improve disseminating evidence and uniformities of care practice.
What Problem Did the Study Address? There is limited evidence of evaluation of evidence-based interventions of implementation. Evaluating evidence-based implementation is important to ensure the quality of patient care and patient safety.
What Were the Main Findings? Evaluation of implementation of evidence-based interventions focused on nurse and patient outcomes. Evaluation of the entire implementation process was not identified, and implementation strategies were not evaluated.
Where and on Whom Will the Research Have an Impact? Evidence-based practice implementation in nursing for researchers, developers, nursing leaders and clinical nursing practitioners who implement and evaluate evidence-based practice implementation.
PRISMA 2020 statement.
No Patient of Public Contribution: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To examine the reasons for and methods of using remote video monitoring to prevent falls across hospital and residential aged care, and explore how staff, patients, residents and families perceive its use and benefits.
Scoping Review.
Following JBI methodology, eight databases were searched in July 2025 with no date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened studies using predefined criteria, and one reviewer extracted data. Narrative and thematic syntheses described how video monitoring is implemented for falls prevention and explored stakeholders' attitudes.
Thirty-five studies were included, with 77% conducted in hospitals and 86% focusing on staff perspectives, highlighting a critical underrepresentation of patients/residents and families. Perceived effectiveness was shaped by underlying motivations—falls prevention, workforce optimisation, or cost reduction. Attitudes were influenced by workload impacts, video monitoring knowledge, ethical and liability concerns. Three remote video monitoring models were identified: technician-based, automated alerts, and nurse-observed without alerts. Technician-based systems were only in hospitals, with no equivalent in aged care.
Research on remote video monitoring for falls prevention is heavily weighted towards hospitals and staff perspectives. Nurses generally viewed video monitoring as effective but still preferred in-person observers. Although there is interest in innovative monitoring systems in aged care that balance safety with a homelike environment, empirical research is lacking. Patient, resident, and family experiences remain underrepresented and require further research.
Remote video monitoring has emerged as an alternative to mobilisation alarms, given their uncertain effectiveness and negative consequences for patients and nurses. Much U.S. hospital research reflects a cost-reduction paradigm aimed at replacing in-person observers, a trend not seen internationally or in aged care. This research is relevant to decision-makers considering technological options for falls prevention and to nurse leaders seeking insight into the appeal and apprehension surrounding video monitoring.
PRISMA-ScR.
None.
Gynaecological cancer nurses are crucial to the delivery of quality, specialised care to meet the needs of people with these cancers. The extent of evidence-based guidance to support nursing care is unknown.
To identify and describe existing international guidance for specialised gynaecological cancer nursing care.
Scoping review.
This scoping review utilised the participants, concept, context framework with narrative synthesis.
Databases including MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO), Proquest Central (Alumni) and Google Scholar were searched on 4 April 2025 along with relevant websites and reference lists of included sources. Included sources referred to the nurse's role and provided clinical guidelines, practice recommendations or equivalent guidance on how nurses provide specialised care. Sources were limited to those published in English from 2009 to present.
Of 1905 sources identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria. Sources were published by authors in seven countries between 2014 and 2024. Most sources related to one specific gynaecological cancer type and/or one aspect or time point of care. Sources varied in the volume of nurse relevant content. No individual source provided comprehensive nursing guidance across all gynaecological cancer types.
Internationally published guidance for specialised gynaecological cancer nursing presents gaps in available evidence for care. We recommend comprehensive guidance resource development to meet clinical nurses' needs and improve translation of evidence-based nursing practice.
The current lack of comprehensive published guidance for specialised gynaecological cancer nursing does not meet reported needs of nurses working in clinical practice and may be contributing to variation in nursing care delivery.
Trial Registration: https://osf.io/ntdzj; registered 24 March 2025; Open Science Framework
To identify and report how gender justice is conceptualised and discussed in contemporary health literature in relation to the Triple Planetary Crisis of climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss, with a particular focus on the experiences of women and gender-diverse populations, and the representation of nurses and other healthcare professionals dominated by women.
Scoping review.
Searches were conducted across MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus, CINHAL, Embase and ProQuest, focusing on studies published from January 1 2000–23 September 2024.
The review was conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported against the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Data were extracted according to a pre-specified extraction framework, developed a priori, encompassing components of gender justice and intersectionality.
A total of 39 studies were included: 17 (43.6%) qualitative, 17 (43.6%) quantitative and 5 (12.8%) mixed methods. The focus of the studies included gendered experiences of climate change (30.8%), decision-making and governance (20.5%), health and wellbeing (17.9%), women's economic participation (15.4%), cultural and spiritual connections to land (7.7%), and intersectionality and human rights (7.7%). Gender-diverse populations, nurses and other healthcare professions dominated by women were not represented in the literature.
The literature reported that women experienced differentiated exposure to the Triple Planetary Crisis. The underrepresentation of gender diverse people and nurses in recent studies remains a significant barrier to advancing understanding of gender justice. Integrating gender justice into health systems is increasingly important to prevent women from being disproportionately impacted by the Triple Planetary Crisis.
More attention to inclusion of frontline healthcare professionals, including nurses, in governance, policy discussions and leadership roles could strengthen the response to systemic environmental threats.
No patient or public involvement.
To map how simulation-based education supports the development of critical thinking skills required for nurses to recognize delirium in clinical practice.
A scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, refined by Levac and colleagues.
Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data to identify studies evaluating simulation-based education designed to strengthen nurses' delirium recognition and associated critical thinking processes. A narrative approach was used to chart and synthesize findings across varied simulation modalities and clinical contexts.
The search was conducted on 4 September 2025, using MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. No timeframe was applied to the search.
Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Simulation-based education consistently enhanced skills aligned with critical thinking, including observational accuracy, recognition of fluctuating cognitive cues, clinical reasoning, reflective awareness, empathy and communication within interprofessional teams. Structured debriefing played a central role in helping nurses analyse decision-making processes and integrate experiential learning into clinical judgement. Several studies reported changes in practice, including more consistent use of delirium identification tools and improved clarity of clinical documentation.
Simulation-based education strengthens interconnected domains of critical thinking that underpin nurses' capacity to recognize delirium early and respond effectively to its fluctuating presentation. These findings highlight the educational value of immersive, theory-informed simulation for developing the clinical judgement required in cognitively complex patient situations.
Integrating structured simulation into nursing education and professional development may enhance timely delirium recognition, foster more effective interprofessional communication and support safer, higher-quality care for hospitalized adults.
Simulation-based education offers a practical and scalable strategy for improving delirium recognition across care settings. By supporting nurses in noticing subtle cognitive changes, interpreting clinical patterns and communicating concerns with clarity and confidence, simulation contributes to stronger workforce preparedness and patient safety.
This review adhered to PRISMA-ScR reporting guidance.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Disaster response presents significant challenges to the competence of nurses. Virtual reality simulation (VRS) offers innovative opportunities for nursing administrators and educators in the field of disaster nursing education and training.
This study aimed to explore the use and effectiveness of virtual reality simulations in disaster nursing education and training.
A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, extended by Levac. The following databases were systematically searched from inception to August 30, 2024: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Database and CBM. Two researchers independently screened the identified articles and extracted relevant data. This scoping review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
The review included thirteen studies published between 2013 and 2024. Of these, seven studies employed a quasi-experimental design, six utilised a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design and one study used a longitudinal experimental design. The disaster nursing education and training content covered six main areas: triage training, on-site first aid training, infectious disease prevention and control, disaster response skills training, emergency response training for nursing staff and post-disaster psychological recovery training. The reported outcomes primarily focused on Kirkpatrick's Level 1 (participant satisfaction with the training experience) and Level 2 (measuring the benefit to participants from the training).
This scoping review identified the research progress and trends of virtual reality simulation technology in the process of cultivating disaster nursing talents at home and abroad and provides a reference for disaster nursing managers and educators to conduct disaster nursing training based on virtual reality simulation technology.
This is a review article based on a review of the literature, with no patient participation.
To examine and map the available literature on outcomes associated with interventions carried out by advanced practice nurses in chronic wound care.
The role of the advanced practice nurses in wound care is identified as a key element in the management of patients with chronic wounds. However, the literature offers fragmented knowledge of the outcomes associated with their practice.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was conducted following the methodological framework proposed by Arskey and O'Malley, following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review. PRISMA-ScR Checklist is included in the manuscript. Observational or experimental studies related to patients affected by chronic wounds and cared for by advanced practice nurses in wound care were included.
The following databases were queried: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from 01 May 2025 to 31 October 2025.
The search strategy in the consulted databases identified 1956 studies; 31 met the inclusion criteria. Different types of chronic wounds were investigated: diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure injuries. The most frequently measured outcomes were clinical responses (healing, recurrence, complications), organizational efficiency (referrals, resource utilization), and patient-reported outcomes.
Evidence from the included studies suggests that Advanced practice nurses led wound care models may be associated with faster healing, lower recurrence and complication rates, and more efficient care pathways, across different settings. This review highlights the global applicability of APN-led models, showing consistent improvements in clinical, organizational, and patient-reported outcomes through core interventions.
This scoping review follows Arskey and O'Malley's methodological framework and the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
The revision protocol was registered on the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P9TA4).
To identify and synthesise the scientific evidence on determinants of self-care deficits in people with chronic wounds.
Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.
This scoping review was conducted by a review team responsible for study screening, data extraction and synthesis. The categorisation of findings was grounded in Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory and operationalised using the COM-B model and the Theoretical Domains Framework.
A comprehensive search, without date or language restrictions, was conducted in Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Scopus (Elsevier), SciELO, Ovid and EMBASE (Elsevier), from November 2023 to April 2024.
Of the 3076 records identified, 22 studies were included. Most were cross-sectional studies, with sample sizes ranging from seven to 1085 participants and a mean age of 61.45 years, predominantly involving people with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Findings were synthesised into four categories: clinical, socioeconomic, behavioural and health system-related factors, indicating that multiple interrelated determinants influence engagement in self-care and contribute to persistent self-care deficits.
The findings demonstrate the vulnerability of people living with chronic wounds, arising from the complex interaction of clinical, psychosocial, socioeconomic and health service-related factors that determine self-care deficits. These deficits compromise wound healing, prolong treatment and negatively affect quality of life, underscoring the need for person-centred approaches to care.
This study reinforces the need for integrated and sustainable models of care grounded in person-centred practice, aimed at strengthening self-care capacities, enhancing clinical practice and informing more equitable health policies.
This review highlights the multifactorial nature of self-care deficits in people with chronic wounds. Nursing plays a key role in identifying barriers and strengthening capacities through Orem's supportive–educative system. Person-centred interventions improve adherence and continuity of care.
This review follows the PRISMA guidelines for reporting.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
This study aimed to retrieve, evaluate, and synthesize the best available evidence on noise management in neonatal wards to establish a foundational basis for implementing effective noise control practices.
Guided by the “6S” evidence pyramid model, a systematic search was performed across multiple sources including clinical decision support systems, guideline repositories, professional websites, and major databases up to April 12, 2025. Literature types encompassed guidelines, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and systematic reviews. Following quality appraisal, two researchers independently extracted and synthesized the evidence.
Sixteen publications were included: one guideline, six evidence summaries, six systematic reviews, and three expert consensuses. From these, 33 pieces of best evidence were synthesized and categorized into five key domains: noise sources, measurement techniques, threshold levels, reduction interventions, and clinical effects of noise.
This work provides a scientifically rigorous and comprehensive evidence summary for neonatal ward noise management, offering valuable guidance for clinical practice. Successful application requires adaptation to local contexts. Developing tailored, evidence-based implementation plans is recommended to bridge the evidence-practice gap and enhance neonatal outcomes.
Given neonates' heightened vulnerability, standardized noise management in the NICU is crucial. This summary provides clinicians with a robust, evidence-based framework to develop localized protocols. Its implementation is expected to improve the acoustic environment, thereby promoting physiological stability, supporting neurodevelopment, and reducing noise-related complications.
This evidence summary followed the reporting specifications of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (Joanna Briggs Institute methodology) and was registered (ES20257726).
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Research and innovation are essential for advancing clinical practice and safeguarding patient safety in healthcare. This review aims to assess the research capacity of Advanced Practice Nurses in Australian healthcare settings. By identifying the barriers and enablers to, the findings aim to inspire research engagement of paediatric nurses.
A rapid review methodology was used to systematically identify, appraise and synthesise data relevant to Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity.
A comprehensive search of Ovid Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases was conducted, covering publications from 1 July 2010 to May 2024. Additional reference checks and grey literature searches were undertaken to identify relevant studies.
Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently and checked by the research team. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment and a descriptive narrative synthesis approach integrated findings across qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings revealed that while Advanced Practice Nurses value research and evidence-based practice, barriers—such as time constraints, limited resources, and lack of organisational support—restricted their engagement. Leadership support and structured mentorship were identified as critical enablers of research capacity.
This review highlights the need for targeted strategies to enhance Advanced Practice Nurses' research capacity within Australian healthcare. Addressing identified barriers and fostering a supportive environment can empower Advanced Practice Nurses to better utilise their roles, contributing to improved patient care and healthcare innovation.
This research addresses the limited understanding of research capacity among Advanced Practice Nurses identifying challenges and opportunities for engagement. It is particularly relevant for healthcare organisations, policymakers, and educational institutions seeking to strengthen research capacity among APN roles. Findings will inform evidence-based practice, patient outcomes, and research culture in Australian healthcare services.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42024539163
Procedural pain and distress in children can result in severe short- and long-term consequences, including post-traumatic stress syndrome and needle phobia. While distraction techniques (e.g., toys, music) have been widely used, virtual reality (VR) offers a novel, immersive form of distraction. Despite the rapid development of VR technologies, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding which paediatric patients and procedures benefit most from VR interventions.
We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) identified studies from January 1, 2000 to November 15, 2025. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs assessing VR for pain/anxiety management during medical procedures in paediatric patients, with outcomes including pain intensity, distress, feasibility, satisfaction or safety.
Of the 5458 original database citations, 201 were eligible for full-text evaluation. Of these articles, a total of 22 were included in the scoping review. RCTs comprised 81.8% (n = 18). The majority (86.4%) employed immersive VR and 27.3% utilized cost-effective smartphone-based systems. Procedures targeted included venipuncture, needle-related interventions, intravenous access, surgery and burn wound care. Approximately 86.4% of studies reported VR's superiority over standard care in reducing procedural pain and distress.
VR is an effective, non-pharmacological tool for managing procedural pain and distress in paediatric clinical settings, showing promise for integration into routine care. However, existing studies exhibit methodological heterogeneity and focus primarily on short-term outcomes. Future research should prioritize large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs with long-term follow-up, and focus on developing standardized, evidence-based VR protocols for diverse paediatric populations.
No patient or public contribution was required for this scoping review, as it only synthesized existing published literature without primary data collection.
To conduct a scoping review of nurse-led Knowledge Translation strategies aimed at promoting and enhancing patient safety in hospital settings.
Scoping review.
This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to PRISMA-ScR.
Twelve electronic databases and additional grey literature sources were searched for studies published between 2002 and 2023, with no language restrictions.
From 23,691 records identified, 59 studies were included. The majority (n = 56) employed multifaceted Knowledge Translation strategies, incorporating simulation, audits, digital tools and interprofessional education. The interventions focused on patient safety-related events, including falls, pressure injuries and catheter-associated complications. Nursing leadership emerged as a key component, particularly in team training, developing care protocols and delivering feedback. Outcomes included reductions in adverse events, improved adherence to clinical guidelines and cost savings. Yet, sustaining behaviour changes over time and limited interprofessional and family engagement remained recurrent challenges.
Nurse-led Knowledge Translation strategies were heterogeneous, with increasing use of simulations, technologies and multifaceted approaches. Evidence suggests potential associations with fewer adverse events, improved care quality, individualized planning and cost efficiency. Challenges related to the sustainability of interventions persist. Findings underscore the importance of investing in nursing leadership and capacity-building to strengthen patient safety.
Strengthening nurse-led KT capacities may enhance evidence-based care and improve safety outcomes. Investment in leadership and tailored implementation is critical.
What problem did the study address? The limited synthesis of how nurses lead KT strategies to improve patient safety in hospitals. What were the main findings? Most strategies were multifaceted, context-sensitive and associated with improved care processes and safety indicators. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? Findings are relevant to hospital nurses, nurse educators, managers and health systems seeking to implement evidence-informed safety interventions.
This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Open Science Framework (OSF); registration identifier: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K3VJC
To identify and describe the current literature on neurodivergence in nursing and to identify existing gaps in knowledge.
Scoping review guided by Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines and PRISMA-Scoping Review framework.
Comprehensive search with inclusion following Participants, Concept, and Context framework: nurses or nursing workforce; neurodiversity or neurodivergence defined as autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia; workplace environment. Articles were screened and data extracted by independent reviewers. Dates of inclusion were 1999–2025. Data analysed through descriptive categorisation.
MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and PsycINFO (Ovid) were searched in April 2025, followed by reference mining and citation cross-referencing. Inclusion criteria were set for empirical studies, reviews, or textual evidence (expert opinions or narratives).
Twenty-two sources met inclusion criteria. Most addressed dyslexia and neurodiversity. Sources described strengths of neurodivergent nurses (e.g., deep focus, relationality, novel perspectives), workable challenges (e.g., documentation and multitasking). Studies reported adaptations at multiple levels: individual, interpersonal, and intraprofessional, noting system influences of medical model framing and gender bias in diagnosis.
Literature on neurodivergent nurses in the workplace is scarce. Neurodivergence offers strengths and challenges, yet ableism and limited research restrict well-being and professional advancement.
Greater recognition of neurodivergence in nursing could enhance workforce retention, innovation, and inclusivity. Neurodivergent nurses' perspectives should inform research, workplace design, and professional development.
What problem did the study address?: Limited research on neurodivergence in nursing despite growing awareness of neurodivergence generally and overall challenges in nursing retention and well-being. What were the main findings?: Literature encompasses empirical studies and textual evidence presenting strengths and challenges for nurses. Adaptation centered on the individual. Where and on whom will the research have an impact?: Researchers to increase empirical studies on neurodivergent nurses, including participatory methods; Leaders interested in workplace inclusion, sustainable workplaces, and professional innovation; Neurodivergent nurses and policy-makers concerned with workforce rights and healthcare resilience.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To systematically map the landscape of central venous access device research from 2014 to 2024, identifying critical gaps in evidence that may impact nursing practice and patient outcomes across the full device lifecycle from selection through to removal.
This review was conducted in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched with additional hand-searching of reference lists from included reviews.
We systematically reviewed literature published between 2014 and 2024, mapping 710 studies on central venous access device interventions and outcomes. Studies were categorised by design, population, setting, device characteristics, intervention types, and outcomes. Evidence was evaluated using the National Health and Medical Research Council levels of evidence framework.
Of 710 included studies, 89 were systematic reviews and 621 primary studies, of which 41.1% (n = 292) were randomised controlled trials. Research was primarily conducted in high-income countries (n = 405, 65.2%) and focused on adults (n = 370, 59.6%) in hospital inpatient settings (n = 588, 94.7%). Catheter insertion and infection prevention dominated the evidence base, while device selection and removal procedures were less studied. Infection outcomes were extensively reported (bloodstream infection: n = 455, 13.6% of 3349 outcomes), while patient-reported outcomes (n = 218, 6.5%) and cost (n = 60, 1.8%) were underrepresented.
This review reveals that central venous access device research is predominantly focused on insertion and infection prevention while other key parts of nursing practice are under-supported.
Future nursing research should address these gaps to improve evidence-based care across diverse populations and healthcare contexts, particularly focusing on understudied device types, settings, and vulnerable populations.
This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To identify and synthesise the ethical, feasibility and acceptability challenges associated with implementing eye-tracking research with clinicians in acute care settings and to explore strategies to address these concerns.
Scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.
Six databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Reference lists of included studies were also hand-searched.
Eligible studies involved clinicians using or interacting with eye-tracking devices in acute care environments and addressed at least one ethical, feasibility, or acceptability consideration. Data were extracted and thematically analysed. Knowledge users, including clinicians, ethicists and a patient partner, were engaged during protocol development and findings synthesis.
Twenty-five studies published from 2010 to 2024 were included. Seven challenges were identified: obtaining ethical approval, managing consent, privacy and confidentiality concerns, collecting data in unpredictable environments, interference with care, participant comfort and data loss or unreliability. Knowledge users highlighted the importance of early institutional engagement, clear protocols, continuous consent and context-sensitive ethical reflection.
Eye-tracking offers valuable insights into clinician behaviour and cognition, but its implementation in acute care raises complex ethical and methodological issues. Responsible use requires anticipatory planning, stakeholder engagement and flexible yet rigorous protocols.
By informing the development of ethically sound study protocols and consent practices, this work contributes to safer, more transparent and patient-centred research that respects participant autonomy and protects clinical workflows.
The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/jn4yx).
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Page et al., 2021) and its Extension for Scoping Reviews (Tricco et al., 2018).
A patient partner was involved in protocol development, interpretation of findings and development of study recommendations. Their contributions included participating in advisory groups and providing feedback alongside clinicians and ethicists during focus groups. This input helped ensure the research addressed patient-relevant priorities and informed the development of ethically responsible practices for conducting eye-tracking research in clinical care settings.
Advance care planning for people with dementia is an important process to ensure that patient preferences are respected throughout disease progression. However, the complexity of advance care planning and the challenges in effective communication hinder its implementation. The lack of clear procedural guidance for health care teams and the limited research on practical issues such as building trust and resolving conflicts further complicate this process.
To explore the key components of and processes for advance care planning for people with dementia.
The authors conducted a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, NICE, Open Grey, CNKI, and Wanfang. The inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting advance care planning practices and stakeholder perspectives related to dementia.
The review included 45 studies and identified key components and processes for successfully implementing advance care planning in dementia care. These components include enhancing readiness, capturing patient wishes, and executing those wishes. The implementation processes cover assessing participation capacity, selecting surrogate decision-makers, and identifying healthcare providers who implement advance care planning. As the condition of people with dementia progresses, the role of healthcare providers who implement advance care planning becomes increasingly important in advance care planning practices.
The success of advance care planning depends on the interconnection of multiple components, and the findings offer practical insights for improving the advance care planning process to ensure that the care preferences of people with dementia are respected throughout the progression of the disease.
PRISMA-ScR.
This is a review without patient and public contribution.
To map evidence of the existing virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes and the effects of these educational programmes on dementia formal and informal caregivers.
A scoping review.
A comprehensive search of nine databases was conducted to find studies from the inception of the databases to October 2023. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts related to the eligibility criteria. Full texts of potentially relevant studies were read by one author and checked by a second. Data extraction and synthesis using NVivo 12 were undertaken by one author and checked by two other authors.
Nineteen studies published between 2002 and 2022. The four randomised controlled studies and five qualitative studies were of moderate to good methodological quality. The 10 quasi-experimental studies were of weak to moderate quality. Fifteen virtual reality-based educational programmes had a positive influence on formal and informal caregivers, including improving caregivers' perceptions changing attitudes towards people with dementia, while the nursing competence of formal caregivers did not improve in short term. Educational programmes that covered dementia-related information and care strategies better improved the knowledge level of dementia formal and informal caregivers.
The qualitative and quantitative studies of moderate to good quality included in this study support the idea that virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes may be a safe and effective way and have potential benefits for improving knowledge, perceptions, attitudes and nursing competence.
This scoping review will provide an emerging teaching model for formal and informal caregivers of people with dementia and help them better understand the types and the influence of virtual reality-based dementia educational programmes.
PRISMA-ScR.
Not required as this review in accordance with the aim to map existing literature from the dementia formal and informal caregivers' perspective.
Digital Creative Art Interventions (DCAIs) are innovative approaches to art interventions using digital technology, which can improve older adults' health. However, a comprehensive summary of the implementation of this intervention among older adults is lacking.
To summarise the deliveries and categories of DCAIs, review their feasibility and roles in older adults' healthcare, and explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing DCAIs in older adults.
Scoping review.
This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework, and PRISMA-ScR was used to guide the report.
PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, Web of Science and Cochrane Library on 26 February 2024.
Thirty-one studies were selected in this review. We summarised the deliveries and categories of DCAIs in older adults. Besides, we cleared DCAIs to offer music, dance, museum, photo collage, drama, visual art interaction and mixed art intervention to older adults, primarily through videoconferencing or mobile applications. The five health promotion roles were physiological health enhancer, psychological caregiver, socialisation supporter, cognitive promoter and life optimiser. Most older adults believed DCAIs were not only feasible and acceptable, but they also met some barriers such as technological problems, problems brought about by older adults' decline in functioning, experience and privacy.
Despite the unique advantages of DCAIs, continuous improvements are needed. In the future, researchers and healthcare workers should focus on platform improvements, increasing interactivity, diversifying formats and ensuring security and privacy.
This review found that DCAIs offered new approaches to treatment options for older adults' physical and mental health. Therefore, it is recommended that they be continuously optimised and put into clinical practice.
No patient or public contribution.
This study summarised the DCAIs and provides the new approach for health promotion in older adults.
OSF (https://osf.io/m62x9/, registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZGE6)
To map and synthesise the main recommendations for arterial blood gas (ABG) collection in intensive care units (ICUs).
A scoping review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR Checklist, supported with The PAGER framework and guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to ensure methodological rigour and analytical comprehensiveness.
Data collection was conducted from February to April 2024. The data sources included: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, PubMed Central, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Web of Science (WoS), SCOPUS, Science Direct, Virtual Health Library (VHL), Excerpta Medica database (Embase), CAPES Thesis and Dissertation Catalogue, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD), Scientific Open Access Repository of Portugal (RCAAP), Theses Canada and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) repository.
Key findings recommend the radial artery as the preferred puncture site, an insertion angle of 30° to 45°, the use of 1 or 3 mL syringes and 20G or 23G gauge needles. Transport and storage at room temperature are advised. Cryoanalgesia and subcutaneous analgesia methods were found to be effective for pain management.
The review highlights the best practices for arterial blood gas collection in critical care. The synthesized evidence strengthens clinical practice, informs guidelines for intensive care nursing and promotes safer, higher-quality care for critically ill patients.
The evidence-based recommendations identified can enhance nursing care related to arterial blood gas collection. Adherence to these practices promotes safer, more humanised and evidence-based care during the procedure.
The report of this study followed the PRISMA-ScR Checklist.
There was no patient or public involvement in this scoping review.
To synthesise evidence on wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring in adult hospital inpatients, focusing on clinical effectiveness, nursing perspectives, workflow impact, patient experience and resource implications.
Scoping review.
Joanna Briggs Institute methodology reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Six databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane), Scite.ai, and hand searching for studies published between January 2015 and November 2025. Data were synthesised using reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixty-seven studies from 19 countries were included. Four integrative themes were identified. (1) Enhancing clinical safety through continuous monitoring: wearable devices consistently enable earlier recognition of physiological deterioration; however, downstream outcomes such as length of stay and transfers to intensive care units were mixed and context dependent. (2) Transforming nursing practice and workflow integration highlighted improved situational awareness and potential efficiency gains, alongside challenges related to alarm overload, parallel documentation and implementation workload. (3) Patient experience of wearable monitoring: most patients reported reassurance and perceived safety, though experiences reflected a tension between monitoring as care and monitoring as surveillance; discomfort, anxiety, and privacy considerations were infrequently examined. (4) Economic and organisational consequences: potential system value was suggested through workforce efficiencies, but economic benefits were largely inferred, with infrastructure and training costs often underreported.
Wearable continuous monitoring technologies show clear potential to support nursing observations enabling improved early detection of deterioration. Realising these benefits depends on effective integration into workflows, robust governance, and sustained nursing leadership rather than technological capability alone. Significant evidence gaps remain regarding long-term outcomes, economic evaluation, and large-scale implementation.
Wearable devices for continuous vital signs monitoring have the potential to transform inpatient surveillance by enabling earlier recognition of physiological deterioration and enhancing nurses' situational awareness. This scoping review synthesises international evidence demonstrating that, although wearable monitoring can improve patient safety and workflow efficiency, its impact depends on effective integration into nursing practice, governance structures, and organisational preparedness. Continuous monitoring also introduces new challenges including alert fatigue, data interpretation, and workflow redesigns, highlighting the vital role of nursing leadership in digital health implementation. The review also identifies critical evidence gaps, particularly concerning long-term clinical outcomes, patient experience, and cost-effectiveness, providing priorities for future research and policy to promote safe, ethical, and sustainable adoption.
None.
FreshRSS 