To estimate the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to identify associated sociodemographic, lifestyle and comorbidity-related factors among men aged ≥50 years in a community setting.

Community-based cross-sectional study.

Primary care and community settings in a district of southern India using multistage cluster sampling across urban and rural areas.

A total of 560 men aged ≥50 years were enrolled and completed the study. Participants were selected through multistage cluster sampling. Men with known alternative causes of LUTS (such as urinary tract infection, neurological disorders or prior prostate surgery) were excluded.

The primary outcome was the prevalence of LUTS, suggestive of BPH, defined as an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥8. Secondary outcomes included the distribution of individual urinary symptoms, IPSS severity categories, quality-of-life scores and factors associated with LUTS. Outcomes were analysed using survey-weighted methods accounting for clustering and sampling weights.

The survey-weighted mean (SD) IPSS score was 3.46 (2.64), with a median (IQR) of 3 (2-4). Most participants reported minimal urinary symptoms, including no incomplete emptying (82.1%), no urgency (81.4%), normal urinary stream (90.5%), and no straining (90.0%). Nocturia was common, with 43.6% waking once and 28.8% waking twice per night. Overall, 80.2% were mildly symptomatic, 10.1% moderately symptomatic and 0.4% severely symptomatic. The prevalence of LUTS suggestive of BPH was 10.32% (n=58; 95% CI 5.7 to 18.0). In survey-weighted multivariable Poisson regression, below-poverty-line status (adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) 4.13; 95% CI 1.38 to 12.41), physical inactivity (APR 2.89; 95% CI 1.81 to 4.63), diabetes mellitus (APR 2.58; 95% CI 1.26 to 5.30), cardiac disease (APR 3.27; 95% CI 1.67 to 6.41), and arthritis (APR 1.88; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.42) were independently associated with LUTS.

Approximately one in ten men aged ≥50 years had LUTS, suggestive of BPH. The findings indicate a higher prevalence of LUTS among men with socioeconomic disadvantage, physical inactivity and cardiometabolic comorbidities. Integrating symptom-based screening for LUTS into routine primary care and chronic disease follow-up may facilitate early identification and improve quality of life among older men. Further research is warranted to explore longitudinal relationships and alternative symptom thresholds in community populations.

The COVID-19 pandemic threatened global HIV Test and Treat Efforts. We assessed whether it affected (1) the number of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiations and (2) the proportion of timely ART initiations in people living with HIV (PLWH) globally.

Quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design using routinely collected data from HIV clinics.

360 HIV care clinics across primary and secondary levels of care, participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium, in 31 countries in Asia, Africa and the Americas.

177 391 PLWH (≥18 years old) who initiated ART 2 years before and 1 year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in their country.

The primary outcome was the number of ART initiations per week; the secondary outcome was the proportion of timely ART initiations (ie, ART initiated within 7 days of enrolment). We assessed changes in these outcomes in the 52 weeks after compared to the 104 weeks before the pandemic onset, defined using each country’s peak Oxford Stringency Index score between January and June 2020.

Among 177 391 newly enrolled PLWH, 129 743 initiated during the pre-pandemic and 47 648 post-pandemic onset. 72.5% of ART initiations were timely pre-pandemic whereas 82.3% were during the pandemic. Absolute number of ART initiations remained stable during the pandemic period in 25 of 31 countries but decreased significantly in six countries: India (–5.0 p, 95% CI –9.2 to –0.7), Rwanda (–10.0 p, –18.6 to –1.4), Malawi (–33.4 p, –54.1 to –12.3), South Africa (–130.8 p, –188.6 to –73.1), Zimbabwe (–12.9 p, –20.0 to –5.8) and Togo (–19.6 p, –39.1 to –0.1). The proportion of timely initiations was stable in all countries except in Kenya (+4.2 pp, 95% CI +0.3 to +8.1) and in Mozambique (+2.7 pp, +0.5 to +4.9), where it increased significantly.

A deeper understanding of the factors that contributed to sustaining ART initiations, particularly in settings with stringent public health and social measures, is needed. These insights should inform preparedness strategies, resource allocation and policy development to ensure continuity of HIV services during future health emergencies, in line with World Health Organisation recommendations.

The aim is to explore co-design facilitators’ perspectives and experiences of using co-design to improve intrapartum care in four sub-Saharan African settings. The inquiry focuses particularly on how they fostered engagement, built trust and mitigated unintended consequences during the co-design process.

Qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis.

Sixteen public and private not-for-profit hospital-based maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda (four per country).

A total population sample of 10 co-design facilitators involved in a hospital-based co-design project implemented in maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023.

Co-design facilitators viewed co-design as a collaborative process to develop contextually relevant solutions. Our findings elucidate their role in facilitating consensus-building and fostering stakeholder ownership amidst significant power divides. They described approaches co-design facilitators take to maintain ongoing stakeholder engagement and manage misaligned expectations in a trusting and collaborative environment, while being mindful of existing tensions and power imbalances. They also highlighted key challenges faced, including navigating norms, power imbalances and unintended consequences.

This study underscores the importance of power-sharing, fostering ownership and engaging end users equitably and continuously in co-design efforts, while also being aware of how to address its potential unintended consequences. Further research is needed to understand co-design facilitators’ impact on co-design and how to address unintended consequences for stakeholders during and after co-design activities in intrapartum interventions in low-resource settings.

Traditional encounter-based analyses overlook downstream costs and complications that follow emergency department (ED) care. To enable more comprehensive evaluations, we developed standardised episode of care definitions for five common, high-cost conditions: chest pain, congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and suicidality.

A two-round modified Delphi panel study was conducted following a literature review and evidence synthesis. Using structured surveys with anonymous feedback, panellists rated candidate criteria. To be retained in the final episode definitions, criteria were required to meet a predefined validity threshold without panellist disagreement. Data were analysed descriptively, and meeting deliberations were recorded and reviewed thematically.

Virtual, supported by an online survey platform.

A multidisciplinary panel of 11 experts in emergency medicine and relevant clinical specialties with 9 members participating in each round.

Criteria to determine inclusion, exclusion (including pre-trigger, post-trigger and event exclusion) and risk-adjustment standards for constructing ED-based episodes of care.

Candidate criteria were presented to the panel by condition: 30 for chest pain, 54 for CHF, 30 for COPD, 79 for pneumonia and 375 for suicidality. Following deliberations and re-rating, the number of valid criteria was reduced, primarily in the episode exclusion category. Thematic analysis highlighted trade-offs between episode exclusion criteria and the use of risk adjustment to account for heterogeneity.

Operational definitions for ED-based episodes of care for five conditions were established. These may support healthcare administrators, policymakers and researchers in evaluating variation in ED care delivery and its downstream cost and outcomes.

Teenagers widely use digital devices for information sharing and other daily activities. Their heavy reliance on smartphones and tablets may contribute to repetitive-use injuries of the thumb.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of texting thumb (TT) among medical students and to identify the potential associations between TT and behavioural patterns during digital device use.

This cross-sectional study employed an online, self-developed questionnaire to assess demographic and behavioural patterns associated with smartphone use. Data on thumb pain and its features were evaluated for diagnostic purposes. This study comprised medical students from six medical schools in Jordan. Data were collected from 482 medical students, excluding those who did not meet the inclusion criteria.

The prevalence of TT was 34%, predominantly on the right side (53%) and at the thumb base (69%). The findings suggest that TT was significantly associated with specific behavioural patterns, including supporting the forearm (p=0.026, adjusted OR: 1.611; 95% CI 1.059 to 2.449), number of texting per day (p=0.005, adjusted OR: 1.319; 95% CI 1.086 to 1.603) and studying hours per day using a digital device (p=0.002, adjusted OR: 1.586; 95% CI 1.193 to 2.109). Also, students’ attitudes toward thumb pain were significantly associated with the TT (p=0.005, adjusted OR: 1.351; 95% CI 1.094 to 1.668).

Students’ attention to behavioural patterns is crucial when using digital devices. Supporting the forearm, limiting text message use, avoiding prolonged use of digital devices, never ignoring hand pain and resting the hand significantly reduce the risk of thumb overuse injury.

Increased risks and concerns regarding patient safety in early-phase studies exist because knowledge about the new intervention is still accumulating. This means that narrow eligibility criteria are needed. However, if early-phase studies are narrow in their inclusion, for example, by not including diverse populations, there is a potential risk that new therapies have insufficient relevant efficacy and safety data. Existing research has explored equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) factors in early-phase pharmaceutical studies, but it has not been possible to find studies that have systematically examined whether EDI factors have been considered in surgical studies reporting innovative procedures. We aim to examine how EDI factors are considered in early-phase surgical studies and surgical innovation reports to explore how this may impact on later-phase evaluation and inclusive intervention implementation.

A scoping review following the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) and Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step process is being conducted. We will search Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for surgical early-phase studies. A two-step screening process for eligibility is being used. Independent double screening will take place for 20% of the papers. Eligible articles will report early evaluation of an innovative surgical/invasive procedure. Excluded will be comparative and later-phase studies and early evaluations of pharmaceutical products even in a surgical setting. Data on article details, patient eligibility and whether protected characteristics are reported and considered will be extracted. Information about EDI considerations reported in the introduction or discussion of the papers will also be extracted. Findings will be discussed with a patient advisory group. A content synthesis approach will be undertaken and descriptive summaries presented.

This study does not require ethical approval being a secondary analysis. The findings will be disseminated through academic journal publications and oral presentations.

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are among the leading non-communicable diseases (NCDs) worldwide. However, diagnosing CRDs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains challenging due to limited access to spirometry and trained professionals. Aggravating the burden, CRDs often coexist with other NCDs, increasing healthcare costs, reducing quality of life and elevating mortality. These challenges highlight the need for simple case-finding approaches for CRDs, such as the COPD in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries Assessment (COLA-6) questionnaire, to support prompt identification and appropriate care within NCD services in LMICs.

To evaluate the discriminative accuracy, feasibility and implementation of the COLA-6 questionnaire in identifying and managing CRDs in Brazilian Primary Healthcare (PHC) services for NCDs.

The Multimorbidity Approach for REspiratory Solutions (MARES) study consists of three work packages to be conducted in PHC services in São Carlos/SP and São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

MARES-1: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 859 individuals with at least one NCD receiving care in PHC. The COLA-6 questionnaire will be administered by the research team and compared with quality-assured spirometry. The Chronic Airways Assessment Test (CAAT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will also be assessed. The diagnostic performance of COLA-6 for identifying CRDs—including COPD, asthma, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, restriction and overlaps—will be assessed using area under receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% CIs.

MARES-2: A cross-sectional observational study enrolling 20 healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, community health agents and nurses) from five PHC services. These professionals will apply the COLA-6 during routine NCD care to a total sample of 1000 patients. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of COLA-6, using deductive thematic analysis.

MARES-3: A longitudinal, prospective observational study in which patients from MARES-1 and MARES-2 will be reassessed at 6-month follow-up. A total sample of 473 participants with abnormal spirometry, a diagnosis of CRD or high risk for CRDs is expected. Participants will undergo spirometry, and a subset will be interviewed to explore their healthcare experiences through qualitative thematic analysis. Access to diagnostic and treatment services in Brazil will be assessed. Changes in spirometry values, FeNO, CAAT and ACQ-7 scores from baseline to 6 months in patients from MARES-1 will be analysed.

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committees of Federal University of São Carlos and University of Santo Amaro (UNISA). Ethical approval was also granted by the University College London. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed medical journals and presentations at international conferences. Results will improve identification of CRDs, addressing a significant gap in current PHC settings.

NCT07050823/NCT07093021/NCT07134855.

Few artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are ever evaluated in practice. Although some signal of clinical effectiveness may be needed to justify AI deployment and testing, such data are typically unavailable in early-stage research. This conundrum is especially relevant in the intensive care unit (ICU), where conditions like sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require high-stakes decisions. Our group developed the AI ventilator assistant (AVA), a novel AI CDSS for patients with sepsis ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. But the promising results of predictive performance estimates are not sufficient to assess AVA’s clinical safety and appropriateness prior to future evaluation and deployment. Therefore, we propose a Clinician Turing Test as a novel validation approach to determine whether clinicians can distinguish AVA-generated treatment recommendations from those enacted by real human clinicians. If AVA’s recommendations are consistently indistinguishable from those of real clinicians, thereby ‘passing’ this Turing test, this would provide a strong preclinical signal of safety and appropriateness.

This multisite, randomised, electronic, vignette-based Phase 1b study will use a Clinician Turing Test design. We aim to recruit 350 critical care clinicians, including physicians and advanced practice providers from six US hospitals. Participants will review nine clinical vignettes of patients with sepsis and ARDS derived from the Molecular Epidemiology of Severe Sepsis in the ICU cohort and an associated profile of a suggested treatment plan. For each participant–vignette combination, the source of the treatment profile will be randomly assigned (AI-generated by AVA vs the actually enacted treatment from real human clinicians) in a 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint is the participants’ accuracy in identifying whether a treatment profile was AI-generated or human-generated, assessed using equivalence testing through a mixed-effects logistic regression model with random effects for participants and vignettes. Secondarily, a fitted binary classifier will assess discrimination ability using the C-statistic. Secondary endpoints include clinicians’ perceptions of the safety and appropriateness of the treatment profiles, confidence in distinguishing AI-generated and human-generated recommendations, interest in AI CDSSs for sepsis and ventilator management and the time to complete the survey. This novel Phase 1b design provides preliminary but essential information about an AI CDSS’s clinical appropriateness without the risk or cost of actual deployment, thereby informing decisions about future clinical implementation and evaluation in real clinical environments.

This protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania (Protocol #858201). Results are expected in 2026 and will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

NCT07025096.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death worldwide, making the development of self-management strategies crucial for preventing complications and improving clinical outcomes. This process involves symptom monitoring, treatment adherence, emotional management and a healthy lifestyle, among others. Reliable instruments are necessary to measure self-management, requiring robust psychometric properties. In this way, this COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-based systematic review aims to assess the quality of specific self-management instruments for adults with CVDs.

This systematic review will follow the COSMIN and be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol. Searches will be conducted in seven databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL. Additionally, a manual search will be performed on PROQOLID, PROMIS and The Medical Outcome Trust websites. Studies on the development and validation of patient-reported instruments measuring specific self-management for individuals with CVDs will be included, without language or date restrictions. The search will be performed in November 2025, with the final version of the review expected to be completed in October 2026. Data extraction will follow COSMIN recommendations. The Modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to determine the quality of evidence. Instruments will be categorised according to COSMIN recommendations. All steps will be conducted by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer involved in case of discrepancies. Additionally, the content of the instruments will be analysed and linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, following international recommendations.

This study does not require ethics committee approval as it is a review of published data. The review results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

CRD42024605969.

To examine how menstruation, contraceptive use and gender-based violence intersect to shape the sexual and reproductive health and autonomy of girls and young women in Kenya.

Qualitative study exploring girls and young women’s experiences with contraceptive use and menstrual management, using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions analysed through a reflexive thematic approach.

Four county-run family planning clinics in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya.

77 girls and young women aged 15–19 years (via 35 in-depth interviews and 7 focus group discussions) and 27 family planning clinic providers (via 5 focus group discussions).

Interviewees’ contributions suggest that covert contraceptive use, when discovered through menstrual monitoring, provoked intimate partner violence. Heavy menstrual bleeding, whether related to contraceptive use or not, was viewed as a sexual restriction and also fuelled intimate partner violence. Furthermore, the inability to afford sanitary pads, combined with the stigma surrounding menstruation, drove some girls and young women into exploitative sexual relationships, often resulting in unwanted or unintended pregnancies.

Menstrual bleeding and contraceptive use, both independently and in combination, affect girls and young women’s reproductive autonomy and overall health and well-being, particularly in relation to gender-based violence. Improving menstrual hygiene management, challenging the stigma and harmful norms tied to menstruation and contraception and ensuring safe contraceptive use are integral to improving sexual and reproductive health and autonomy and are requisite for preventing and eradicating gender-based violence.

Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) are predisposed to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) due to craniofacial features (eg, midface hypoplasia, glossoptosis) and studies have shown that the prevalence of OSA in this population is markedly increased compared with that of typically developing children. Adenotonsillectomy is considered the first-line treatment for childhood OSA. However, persistent OSA is common, thus many children with DS are referred for positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy initiation; PAP appears to be an important aspect of living with DS. PAP has been shown to be highly effective in the general population for treating OSA and improving OSA-associated neurobehavioural symptoms, such as quality of life, behaviour, mood, daytime sleepiness and school performance. However, PAP as a treatment for OSA has not been well-studied in children with DS. Therefore, we designed a multicentre randomised controlled trial recruiting children with DS and OSA at three academic institutions, aged 6–18 years, referred for PAP initiation to treat OSA.

86 participants will be randomised to a 6-month intensive behavioural intervention (INT) to improve PAP adherence versus standard clinical care and underwent standardised evaluations of quality of life, behaviour, attention, PAP adherence and healthcare utilisation at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.

This study has been approved by the institutional review board at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (IRB of record, IRB # 20–0 17 512). Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center and University of Miami delegated IRB review and approval responsibility to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia through reliance agreements as mandated by National Institutes of Health (NIH). All participants will be minors; consent will be obtained from parents and assent from participants will be obtained when possible. The intervention tested in this trial is considered not greater than minimal risk, and no identifiable data will be reported. As required by the NIH, a data safety monitoring board (DSMB) has been formed, who will review and approve the protocol and any protocol changes prior to implementation. The study team will send biannual reports and hold a biannual meeting with the DSMB to review any safety and protocol concerns. Findings will be presented at national conferences pertinent to this topic and published in peer-reviewed medical journals. In addition, findings will be shared in the lay format with DS associations around the world and used for training of healthcare providers and trainees (R25HD118212). Further, data collected will be deposited in a repository (National Sleep Research Resource; sleepdata.org) after completion of the study to maximise use by scientific community.

NCT04132999.

Health systems’ (HS) adaptations to climate change (CC) cover two major, and interrelated dimensions: (1) Environmental sustainability—actions aimed at limiting the negative impact of HS on the environment (eg, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions) and (2) Climate resilience—adaptations focused on improving HS’ ability to cope with the impact of CC (eg, by improving HS preparedness to climate-induced natural disasters). Within both dimensions, a diversity of actions, at different HS levels, can take place. The general objective is to provide health policy makers with a comprehensive evidence-based set of recommendations on the scope and effectiveness of HS adaptations to CC.

An umbrella review will be conducted. Systematic reviews will be included if: (1) They focus on HS adaptations to CC (including both environmental sustainability and climate resilience strategies/actions), (2) Were published since 2015 and (3) Report a quality appraisal of included studies. Five databases were searched: (1) MEDLINE via PubMed, (2) Scopus, (3) Web of science core collection, (4) ProQuest Central and (5) The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Two reviewers will independently assess studies’ eligibility, conduct quality appraisal and perform data extraction. Data will be synthesised using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses will guide the reporting of results.

Ethical approval is not required, as this study involves the collection and analysis of secondary data only. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated via dedicated research channels and social media platforms.

CRD420251052647.

Ambulatory care is defined as the provision of medical treatment by healthcare professionals outside an inpatient hospital setting. While well-established in acute medicine, uptake of ambulatory pathways in emergency general surgery (EGS) is variable and optimal design and delivery is unclear in this context. This systematic review sought to (1) appraise current EGS ambulatory pathway literature and (2) ascertain the constituent components across the identified pathways, guiding the development of comprehensive templates for future EGS ambulatory pathways.

Systematic review.

PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library, from 5 December 2018 to 5 December 2023 inclusive.

All primary observational studies (ie, case–control, cohort studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) were included. Case series and conference abstracts were excluded due to the high likelihood of incomplete data. Studies reporting paediatric or non-surgical populations, or ambulatory surgical care within a primary care setting, were also excluded.

General study characteristics (year and journal of publication, country of origin, study design, disease area, number of patients receiving ambulatory management and use of control groups) were recorded. To identify the constituent components of EGS ambulatory pathways, an initial subset of five papers was reviewed, from which four categories were identified (decision-making processes, scoring/classification systems, investigations and care escalation and discharge criteria). An additional fifth component (‘follow-up’) was identified during data extraction. Reporting of the constituent components of ambulatory pathways was also extracted, as well as outcomes including readmission, complications and mortality.

Of 43 included studies, there were 8 RCTs, 31 cohort studies and 4 studies using other methods. Reporting of all aspects of EGS ambulatory pathways was heterogeneous. 24 (56%) papers reported the specialty and grade of clinician acting as senior decision-maker. 17 different scoring/classification systems were used. 32 (74%) papers described using investigations to select ambulatory patients, including blood tests (n=12) and imaging (n=16). Eight studies (19%) specified both care escalation and discharge criteria. Information about follow-up was described in 29 papers, with location (n=29), time points (n=26), personnel (n=16) and the form of the follow-up (n=23) all reported variably. Readmission rates were recorded in 34 studies and ranged from 0% to 13%. Most studies (n=32) reported 30-day readmission, although 48 hours (n=1) and 90 days (n=1) were also used. Mortality was recorded in 24 papers, with 21 reporting a mortality rate of 0 and the remaining 3 reporting rates of

Key components of published EGS ambulatory pathways include decision-making processes, scoring/classification systems, investigations, care escalation and discharge criteria, and follow-up. However, this information is currently inconsistently reported. Future work to identify and agree on guidelines for the ‘core’ components of ambulatory EGS pathways is needed, to facilitate cross-study comparisons, and crucially, provide a ‘gold-standard’ framework for developing future ambulatory pathways.

In the UK, approximately 5.4 million adults live with asthma, of whom one in five have an uncontrolled form. Uncontrolled asthma reduces quality of life and increases healthcare use. Engaging with peers through online health communities (OHCs) can empower patients to self-manage their long-term condition. While OHCs have been in existence for several years and growing numbers of patients access them, the role of primary care in signposting patients to them has been minimal and ad hoc. We have co-developed with patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) an intervention for adult patients with asthma, consisting of an appointment with a primary care HCP to introduce online peer support and sign patients up to an established asthma OHC, followed by OHC engagement. Feasibility work found the intervention acceptable to patients and HCPs. This protocol outlines our plan to test the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

An individual randomised controlled trial will be carried out. Eligible participants will be recruited via an online survey sent to adult patients on the asthma register in 50–70 general practices in several UK locations. Participants will be invited to attend a one-off, face-to-face appointment with a primary care HCP, during which they will be individually randomised to the intervention or usual care. An asthma control test (primary outcome) and other measures of clinical effectiveness will be collected at baseline and every 3 months over a 12-month follow-up period. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to compare outcome measures between study arms. Cost-effectiveness assessment of the intervention compared with current standard of asthma management in primary care will be reported. A sample of patients and HCPs will be interviewed at study exit and the data analysed thematically.

The study was approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (reference: 25/NE/0006). Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through various means, including sharing with general practices, conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

NCT06849245.

Excessive sedentary behaviour (SB) is highly prevalent among children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) treated for cancer. Although SB is associated with adverse health outcomes in adults with cancer, little is known about SB in younger cancer patients and survivors. In this scoping review, we aim to summarise current literature on (1) the association between SB and clinical outcomes and (2) results of intervention trials to reduce SB, specifically in paediatric and AYA cancer patients and survivors.

The scoping review will follow the five stages described in the Arksey and O’Malley methodology framework. We will conduct a comprehensive search in five varied electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and SportDiscus) for original articles published in peer-reviewed journals since 1 January 2000, and search reference lists of identified articles and previous review articles. All original research article types will be considered (ie, cross-sectional, cohort, interventional trials). Two reviewers will independently screen all articles based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, including (1) more than half the sample at the time of study must have been children (0–14 years old) and/or adolescent and young adults (AYAs, 15–39-year old) who were being or had been previously treated for cancer and (2) reporting of SB. Data will be extracted as a descriptive and quantitative summary of each study’s key characteristics and results. Study-specific quality assessment will be performed using established tools. Results will be presented in evidence tables with an accompanying narrative summary.

Ethics approval is not required as only publicly available data will be analysed. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and may be presented at a scientific conference.

The protocol is registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ua8z9).

Chronic inflammatory skin diseases, despite low mortality, significantly impair quality of life (QoL). Up to 80% of patients with dermatological conditions experience severe itch and poor sleep, as well as related mental health challenges such as anxiety and depression. The relationship between skin diseases and mental health highlights the challenges that doctors face in treating these conditions. Existing psychotherapeutics, such as mindfulness training, cognitive behavioural therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy, are widely used and effective in the treatment of mental health illnesses. However, there is limited evidence on the application of such interventions in dermatology, and most mental health apps lack robust clinical evaluation. We report the design of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and implementation of a mobile app containing dermatology-specified psychotherapeutic strategies in reducing QoL burden.

English-speaking patients aged 16 years and older with psoriasis, eczema or chronic urticaria will be recruited and randomised into the intervention arm (psychotherapeutic application) or active control group (Healthy365 app, a general wellness application managed by the Singapore Health Promotion Board). This allows a comparative assessment of app-usage-specific outcomes while preserving the blinding of all participants. The primary outcome is the change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes include physician-assessed disease severity at weeks 8 and 16 relative to baseline, differences in other patient-reported measures at weeks 8, 16 and 32, self-reported treatment adherence and initiation/escalation of systemic medications. To understand how patients engage with the app, we will evaluate the implementation process, focusing on key measures such as engagement, satisfaction and willingness to pay. Statistical analysis will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis, and missing data will be analysed using last observation carried forward.

All participants will receive both verbal and written study information that aligns with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval has been obtained from the National Healthcare Group’s Domain Specific Review Board (reference number: 2022/00751). Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

NCT06702293.