Gestational diabetes is a common metabolic disorder in pregnancy which identifies a substantial increased risk of future diabetes. Despite this risk, many individuals are not screened for dysglycaemia in the postpartum period. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is an evolving technology that provides details of an individual’s glucose levels throughout the day; however, it has not yet been evaluated as a screening tool for postpartum dysglycaemia. To address this gap, this prospective cohort study will examine the use of CGM in the early postpartum period to predict the risk of maternal dysglycaemia after delivery.
The Predicting Dysglycaemia in Individuals with Gestational Diabetes Immediately Postpartum using CGM (PREDISPOSE) study is a prospective cohort study designed to assess the ability of a CGM device (Freestyle Libre 2) worn in the postpartum period to detect persistent dysglycaemia in individuals with gestational diabetes. The study will recruit 240 individuals with gestational diabetes. Each participant will wear the CGM immediately postpartum and before attending routine postpartum diabetes screening, consisting of a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and related blood work (haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), complete blood count and lipid profile). The primary outcome is the accuracy of the area under the curve for all glucose measurements from the first CGM wear to detect postpartum dysglycaemia. We will perform sensitivity and specificity analyses to determine optimal CGM cut-offs to diagnose diabetes or prediabetes. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of postpartum dysglycaemia (based on 75-gram OGTT and/or HbA1c), incidence of postpartum dyslipidaemia, patient acceptability of CGM testing, data variability from CGM and cardiometabolic health outcomes diagnosed in years one, two and five after delivery.
All participating sites have received ethics approval of the current protocol and have started recruitment of participants to the study. The ethics boards that approved this study are the Biomedical Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary, the Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board at Mount Sinai Hospital and the Comité d'éthique de la Recherche at Université Laval. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal, regardless of study findings.
NCT04972955. Registration date: 28 June 2021.
To explore the feasibility and acceptability of pain management (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)) and patient education (PE) to increase physical activity in people with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication (IC).
Feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.
One secondary care UK vascular centre.
56 community-dwelling adults with a history of stable IC and ankle-brachial pressure index ≤0.9 were recruited via claudication clinics.
Participants randomised to 6 weeks of: TENS+PE, TENS, Placebo TENS+PE or Placebo TENS. PE was a 3-hour workshop plus three follow-up phone calls. The TENS machine was worn during walking (TENS: 120 Hz, 200 μs, intensity ‘strong but comfortable’; Placebo TENS: intensity below sensation threshold).
Primary feasibility outcomes included rates of recruitment, retention and adherence. Acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures was explored with semistructured interviews. Measures of walking capacity, walking behaviour, quality of life, disease perception and pain were recorded at baseline, end of intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up (3 months).
56 participants were randomised from 95 who completed baseline screening. Of the 39 excluded, 97% (38/39) had >20% variability in absolute claudication distance. All participants received their allocated intervention. Outcome completion was 91% at 6 weeks and 80% at 3 months. Attendance at group education was 96% with 63% taking follow-up phone calls. Compliance with TENS was 70% according to participant-completed logs. Interviewed participants (n=9) were generally positive about the acceptability of the interventions and trial procedures; however, experience of TENS use was mixed. Some participants were dissatisfied with the size of the device and electrode wires.
The PrEPAID (Pain management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent claudication) trial was feasible to run; however, 40% of potential participants were excluded at screening due to issues of research fidelity rather than participant suitability or willingness to participate. A future definitive trial should consider a revised primary outcome measure and smaller wireless TENS machines.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03204825. Registered on 2 July 2017.
Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government. Translational grant award (TCS/16/55).
We examined studies that analysed the spatial association of cancers with demographic, environmental, behavioural and/or socioeconomic factors and the statistical methods applied.
Systematic mapping review.
Web of Science (SSCI) (search on 28 July 2022), MEDLINE, SocINDEX and CINAHL (search on 4 August 2022), additional searches included grey literature.
(1) Focused on the constituent countries of the UK (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and its major regions (eg, the North West); (2) compared cancer(s) outcomes with demographic, environmental, behavioural and socioeconomic characteristics by applying methods to identify their spatial association; (3) reported cancer prevalence, incidence rates, relative risk or ORs for a risk factor or to an average level of cancer.
A standardised data extraction form was developed and for all studies, core data were extracted including bibliographic information, study design, geographical factors analysed, data aggregation level, methods applied and main findings. We described and synthesised the characteristics of the studies using summary tables, charts and graphs.
52 studies were included covering a variety of objectives and geographical scales. These studies considered different types of cancer, with the most common cancer types analysed being blood and lymphoid cell cancers. The most common methods used to assess the association between cancers and geographical level factors were regression analyses, with the majority being Poisson regression, then logistic and linear regression. Studies were usually conducted at ward and local authority level, or by exact point location when distances from putative risk sources were considered. The results were usually presented in plots or as tables, instead of maps.
Our results highlight the lack of consideration of spatially explicit models in the analysed studies, with the risk of having failed the assumption of independence in the data.
CRD42022349165.
Due to nursing shortages, an ageing population and increasing care demand, there is a growing interest in parenteral medication administration at home (PMAaH), comprising the administration of parenteral medication in the home situation of patients. The operational design of such PMAaH care pathways is complex, resulting in many variations of adoptions, showing a need for a quality framework. Although quality indicators (QIs) have been proposed to monitor the quality of specific care pathways, a generic quality framework for all types of PMAaH is lacking. Therefore, this study proposes a generic quality set for PMAaH, which includes structure and process QIs, to benchmark and redesign PMAaH care pathways to ensure high quality.
A generic QI set was developed for PMAaH using a systematic RAND appropriateness method adapted at the third phase. This method consisted of a scoping review to identify indicators, an expert panel rating phase including an online questionnaire and subsequent panel meeting to assess the appropriateness of the indicators and a retrospective practice testing to evaluate the feasibility, clarity and measurability of the indicators. After the practice testing, which consisted of an online questionnaire where experts could indicate the implementation state of all indicators in their hospital, a third expert panel adjusted the set to increase the likelihood of implementation in practice.
The experts, all healthcare professionals involved in PMAaH processes, were recruited using the snowball sampling technique from three large Dutch, teaching hospitals. Subsequently, a practice testing by self-assessment was conducted in seven large Dutch teaching hospitals.
17 and seven healthcare professionals with diverse backgrounds participated in the online questionnaire and panel meeting, respectively.
The scoping review resulted in 36 QIs for PMAaH. After two expert panel rating rounds (online questionnaire and panel meeting), two indicators were removed: a QI related to travel distance policy since it was irrelevant and redundant, and a QI stating that a clinician should take the lead in a PMAaH-team, which was deemed too restrictive. After the practice testing, two QIs were removed: a QI related to clinical response documentation, which was unclear for the practice testing respondents and already covered by other QIs, and a QI related to survival documentation, which was deemed infeasible and undesirable to measure this differently than other patients by the third expert panel.
The final set consists of 32 indicators (of which 15 were structure indicators and 17 were process indicators). The final set predominately includes QIs that are aimed at patient safety but also QIs focusing on the working conditions of the healthcare workers. 17.6% of the QIs are currently fully implemented in general in all seven hospitals. The practice testing revealed that operational QIs are more frequently implemented in practice than systemic QIs and that a structured quality assurance programme is needed in the hospitals.
This study proposes a generic quality set for PMAaH that hospitals can use to redesign and benchmark PMAaH care pathways to assure high quality. The practice testing confirmed that there is a need for this structured quality set.
We aimed to estimate prevalence and identify determinants of hypertension in adults aged 15–49 years in Tanzania.
We analysed cross-sectional survey data from the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey conducted between February and July 2022. Descriptive statistical analysis, logistic regression, machine learning and geospatial methods were used to estimate prevalence and determine determinants of hypertension.
Tanzania.
A total of 13 385 participants aged 15–49 years were included in the analysis.
The primary outcome variable was hypertension, defined as either systolic blood pressure (BP)≥140 and/or diastolic BP≥90 mm Hg or under anti-hypertensive drugs.
The prevalence of hypertension among adults of reproductive age was 11% (95% CIs 10.09 to 11.56) in Tanzania, varying significantly across risk factors. Prevalence was high in people aged 40–49 (22.11%, 95% CI 20.07 to 24.29) and obese (23.69%, 95% CI 20.67 to 27.00). The mean prevalence of hypertension was also high in the southern, eastern, western, southern highlands, north-west and north-eastern part of the country, correlating with the spatial distribution of older age (30–49) and higher body mass index (BMI) (≥25). Individuals aged 40–49 had nearly six times (adjusted OR (AOR): 5.68, 95% CI 4.10 to 7.83) the odds of hypertension relative to those aged 15–19. Obese individuals had higher odds (AOR: 2.88, 95% CI 2.01 to 4.13) compared with overweight individuals (AOR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.74). Machine learning results showed age and BMI as the most important determinants of hypertension and that significant interactions between risk factors exist.
The prevalence of hypertension varied across risk factors and the strongest determinants of hypertension in adults of reproductive age were age and BMI.
The aim of this study was to provide insights into how, through exploring goal-setting interventions, a nursing team in geriatric rehabilitation might refine their patient-centred strategies.
The study design was participatory action research (PAR).
Team members and nursing students, under the guidance of a facilitator, performed two PAR cycles. In the first cycle, the action phase consisted of preparing a multidisciplinary team meeting (MTM) with a patient. In the second cycle, based on the evaluation of the first, the participants worked with goals on a whiteboard in the patient's room. The data were collected in The Netherlands between February 2020 and June 2022. The data collection methods included the facilitator's logbook, observations, (group) interviews, charting activities and short surveys. Data analysis was conducted in weekly team sessions. The Guidelines for Best Practices in the Reporting of Participatory Action Research were followed.
In the first PAR cycle, the team learned that preparing an MTM with a patient did not enhance the patient's engagement in achieving their rehabilitation goals, but it was beneficial for the nurses' intermediate role between the patient and the multidisciplinary team. Clarity about responsibilities in the multidisciplinary team was a prerequisite for nurses to take on this role adequately. In the second PAR cycle, it became clear that working with a whiteboard in the patient's room had a positive effect on the patient's engagement in the rehabilitation process, and the nurses gained knowledge about a broader variety of professional rehabilitation domains.
Through PAR, the nursing team learned two lessons: cooperating with patients through MTM preparation and working with whiteboards enhanced their patient-centredness, but patients needed tangible goals to become engaged in their rehabilitation planning.
Prepare the multidisciplinary team meeting with the patient, as discussing rehabilitation goals can indirectly boost motivation by making older patients feel seen and heard, even if they seem unable to fully participate in the conversation. Clarify responsibilities in the multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation team. This is a prerequisite for nurses to take on an advocacy role for patients in multidisciplinary team meetings. To enhance patient-centred care, consider working with tangible goals on a whiteboard in the patient's room.
No public and patient involvement.