To explore the barriers and facilitators in adherence to the guidelines in the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo from the perspective of primary care physicians.

Qualitative study using focus groups.

L’Hospitalet del Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.

Qualitative study using focus groups. Structured 90 min focus groups were conducted until data saturation was reached. Each session included a moderator and an observer from the research team. Sessions were transcribed and thematically analysed by three independent researchers.

Purposeful sampling was used to form four groups of 4–10 participants, selected by sex, age, years of experience and primary care team (PCT). Participants were recruited between January and February 2023.

A total of 34 family physicians belonging to four PCTs participated in the study. The main barriers identified were a lack of time, negative initial experiences, a fear of harming patients (especially older adults), difficulty in nystagmus visualisation and challenges in managing patient expectations, as many preferred medication over physical manoeuvres. Facilitators included potential time savings from effective early management, the value of initial practical training with periodic refreshers, access to expert consultants for case discussions and the availability of digital tools, such as tutorials, videos and aids for nystagmus interpretation.

Health systems should invest in protected time for history-taking and physical examination, and in regular, updated training for primary care professionals. This could improve vertigo management and reduce unnecessary investigations and medications, ultimately benefiting both patients and the healthcare system.

To develop and validate a polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) case definition using administrative health data sources.

A validation study.

Secondary care centre outpatient gynaecology clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

3951 electronic health records of women aged 18–45 years who presented to a gynaecology clinic in Calgary, Canada, between January 2014 and December 2019 were reviewed. We identified 180 patients with PCOS using the Rotterdam criteria. Participants were excluded if they were biologically male, pregnant at the time of the consultation, did not meet the date criteria or if their consultation note was missing. The chart data were connected to the Practitioner Claims and the Discharge Abstract Database by personal health number.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68 case definitions for PCOS were estimated. Case definition performance was graded.

Of the 68 case definitions tested, none had high validity. The best performing case definitions were: (1) ≥3 instances of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 256.4 (polycystic ovaries) with exclusion codes (sensitivity 23.89%, specificity 99.59%, PPV 74.14%, NPV 96.35%) and (2) 626.X (irregular menstruation), 704.1 (hirsutism) and ≥3 instances of code 256.4 with exclusion codes (sensitivity 2.78%, specificity 99.97%, PPV 83.33%, NPV 95.40%).

We identified several case definitions for PCOS of moderate validity with high PPV (>70%) for case ascertainment in PCOS research in jurisdictions with similar administrative health data. These case definitions are limited by low sensitivity, which should be considered when interpreting research findings.

To examine the longitudinal impact of time-varying factors on US youth’s trajectories of initiation and use of e-cigarettes and cigarettes during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood.

Longitudinal.

Nationally representative US survey, the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

2682 US youth (aged 16–17) at wave (W)1 of the PATH Study across six waves (2013–2020) into young adulthood (aged 22–23).

Unweighted longitudinal latent class analyses identified trajectory classes of e-cigarette and cigarette use, separately. Nationally representative weighted multinomial logistic regression analyses examined time-varying harm perceptions, substance use problems and tobacco product first tried as predictors of these trajectory classes.

Five e-cigarette classes (2013–2020; 41.5% Persistent Never Use, 12.6% W5 Initiation, 19.9% W3 Initiation, 15.2% Prior Initiation, 10.8% High Frequency Past 30-Day (P30D) Use) and five cigarette classes (2013–2019; 58.6% Persistent Never Use, 11.5% W4 Initiation, 10.9% W2 Initiation, 9.6% Prior Initiation, 9.5% High Frequency P30D Use) were identified. Time-varying harm perceptions and substance use problems were associated with trajectories of initiation and use for both products. Cigarettes, cigarillos, other combustibles and any smokeless tobacco as first product tried were associated with e-cigarette initiation and/or progression to high frequency use. E-cigarettes and hookah as first product tried were associated with later cigarette initiation. High Frequency P30D Cigarette Use was less likely if the first product tried was e-cigarettes, cigarillos, hookah or any smokeless tobacco product.

Results reinforce the need for identification and intervention of early substance use among younger adolescents and targeted public health messaging to address changing harm perceptions and prevent initiation among older adolescents.

Many patients who are extubated after receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure experience extubation failure (ie, require reintubation hours to days after extubation). High-quality evidence shows that extubating patients directly to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), rather than conventional low-flow oxygen, can prevent extubation failure. These guideline-recommended interventions, however, require care coordination involving multiple intensive care unit (ICU) team members and are infrequently used. Interprofessional education (IPE), which teaches members of multiple professions together, could effectively address this implementation gap in complex, team-based, critical care settings, particularly when paired with a customisable protocol.

This batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial will test three hypotheses: (1) when compared with traditional online education (OE), IPE increases implementation of preventive postextubation respiratory support, (2) the benefits of IPE are increased when paired with a clinical protocol and (3) preventive postextubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive postextubation HFNC for low-risk patients reduce in-hospital mortality when compared with conventional postextubation oxygen therapy. The trial will recruit 24 clusters made up of one or more ICUs that care for at least 100 mechanically ventilated patients per year in a large multihospital health system in the USA. All clusters will receive OE, IPE and a clinical protocol, with timing determined by randomisation. We will also randomise half of the clusters to education promoting postextubation NIV for patients at high risk of extubation failure and preventive, postextubation HFNC for patients at lower risk, whereas the other half will be randomised to education promoting postextubation HFNC for all eligible patients. We will include all patients who are invasively mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. The primary implementation endpoint is the rate of use of postextubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants. The primary clinical endpoint is in-hospital mortality truncated at 60 days from intubation.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh and an independent data safety monitoring board. We describe the methods herein using the Standard Protocol Items for Randomised Trials framework and discuss key design decisions. We will disseminate results to participating healthcare providers, through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and via presentations at international conferences.

NCT05523479.

Frailty is a key predictor of adverse surgical outcomes in older adults, contributing to increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalisation and delayed recovery. Prehabilitation—targeting improvements in physical function before surgery—can mitigate these risks. However, traditional programmes often face low adherence due to logistical barriers. Integrating smart wearable devices into tele-supervised, home-based prehabilitation may enhance adherence, engagement and clinical outcomes.

This trial protocol describes the PREhabilitation of frail elderly PAtients undergoing majoR surgEry at HOME study with the objective to evaluate the effectiveness of a wearable-enhanced, tele-supervised prehabilitation programme (swSEP) versus standard care (unsupervised prehabilitation, uSEP) on improving preoperative functional capacity and postoperative outcomes in frail older adults undergoing major elective surgery.

This single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial will enrol 190 patients aged ≥65 years scheduled for major elective, non-cardiac surgery at Singapore General Hospital. Participants with frailty (Edmonton Frail Scale ≥6) will be randomised 1:1 to either the swSEP group (tele-supervised exercise with Fitbit Inspire 3 monitoring) or the uSEP group (standard physiotherapy education, exercise booklet and inspiratory muscle training if maximal inspiratory pressure 2O). The primary outcome is change in 6 min walk test distance from baseline to 1–3 days presurgery. Secondary outcomes include 30 s sit-to-stand test, handgrip strength, postoperative complications (per American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program), hospital length of stay, readmissions, five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and adherence. Data will be analysed using t-tests, analysis of covariance, logistic regression and Cox models, with stratification by baseline nutritional status.

Approved by the SingHealth Institutional Review Board (CIRB Ref: 2024/2242). Trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06633614). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences. Contact: irb@singhealth.com.sg

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06633614

Leishmaniasis poses a significant public health problem in Kenya, where effective case management and treatment rely on accurate diagnosis. This review aims to summarise the research landscape on leishmaniasis diagnostics in Kenya and identify gaps.

This scoping review expands a previously published scoping review on leishmaniasis in Kenya to further analyse studies focusing on diagnostics. The field of diagnostics was chosen because of recent pushes for novel tools and because of the role timely diagnosis plays in disease elimination. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase via Embase.com, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry was conducted, covering studies up to 5 January 2024.

After dual, blind screening with conflict resolution by a third reviewer, 41 studies were included in the review. These studies examined a range of diagnostic tools; however most were assessed in one or few studies, and none evaluated real-time PCR. Additional gaps in the research landscape include a lack of diagnostics for cutaneous leishmaniasis and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis in Kenya, outdated literature surrounding the Direct Agglutination Test and randomised trials for any diagnostic tool.

Future research should focus on solidifying the validity and reliability of diagnostic tools in the Kenyan context and updating previous work.

Vector control is imperative for eliminating leishmaniasis as a public health problem in Kenya. As elimination efforts expand in East Africa, it is crucial to understand the current research landscape. To address that need and identify gaps, a scoping review was conducted to characterise the landscape of leishmaniasis vector research in Kenya.

Building on a previously published scoping review by this team, we updated database searches in PubMed, Embase via Embase.com, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry to incorporate literature up to 4 January 2024 and focused on vector-related papers. Studies classified as ‘prevention’ in the original scoping review were included due to overlapping definitions.

A total of 95 studies were included in the analysis. Although a wide range of sandfly species have been documented, most of the research is outdated, having taken place 20–40 years ago. Existing studies are mostly epidemiological with little focus on basic and clinical research. There are also no studies on post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis despite its potential contribution to the disease transmission cycle. The geographical scope of the research is largely limited to traditional transmission foci with little attention to new disease hotspots such as North Eastern Kenya.

These research gaps need to be addressed to better inform the country’s leishmaniasis prevention and vector control strategy.

Motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (MND/ALS/ALS) is an incurable disease which leads to muscle weakness that worsens over time. MND/ALS is highly heterogeneous in its presentation, with many people experiencing a rapidly progressive trajectory of symptoms. Many people living with MND/ALS (plwMND/ALS) experience a combination of flaccidity and spasticity of the muscles involved in speech, swallowing, breathing and coughing. This makes it challenging to deal with the saliva and mucous (‘secretions") produced by the body. Failure to manage these problems effectively can lead to accumulation and aspiration of secretions, which may cause pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency. Knowing the best way to treat this problem is a challenge. Systematic reviews report substantive ongoing uncertainty regarding secretions management (SM). Little is known about the comparative effectiveness of secretion management interventions, their impact on quality of life and acceptability for plwMND/ALS and their unpaid/family.

A complex intervention systematic review of SM for plwMND/ALS and/or their carers will be conducted using an iterative logic model approach, designed in accordance with the principles and guidance laid out in a series of articles published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on complex intervention reviews . Eight electronic databases will be searched for publications between 1996 and present: Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO Academic Search Ultimate, Scopus, EBSCO PsycInfo, Ovid MEDLINE and the Social Sciences Citation Index. This will be supplemented by hand searching of reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers will independently screen the results for potentially eligible studies using AS Review Lab (a semi-automated machine learning tool). Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using Gough’s Weight of Evidence Framework, will be independently performed by two reviewers. A framework thematic synthesis approach will be employed to analyse and report quantitative and qualitative data. The reporting will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Complex Intervention Extension Statement and Checklist.

This review will involve the secondary analysis of published information; therefore, ethical approvals are not required. Dissemination will be via presentation at scientific meetings, presentations to MND/ALS support groups and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

CRD42025102364.

To develop and validate the Perceived Social Risk Scale (PSRS) for assessing perceptions of socially risky behaviours, and to validate it against existing psychological measures such as perceived social status and depressive symptoms in a UK sample of older adolescents and adults.

A cross-sectional study involving exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Participants were recruited from the Cardiff University’s Department of Psychology participant pool (students completing studies for course credit) and Prolific Academic (a crowdsourcing platform for research volunteers). Data collection occurred between 17 February and 6 May 2024.

A total of 640 UK participants, including both men and women, aged 18-65.

We measured the internal consistency of the PSRS, test-retest reliability and validity against measures including rejection sensitivity, perceived social status, depressive symptoms and resistance to peer influence. Moderation analyses examined the role of perceived social status, age and a sense of belonging in the relationship between PSRS scores and depressive symptoms.

The PSRS showed excellent internal consistency (α=0.96) and good test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)=0.70). Perceptions of social risks significantly declined with age (r=–0.20, p) and factor analyses confirmed that the PSRS differentiates among four distinct but related social risk constructs: authenticity and integrity (α=0.91), social assertiveness (α=0.72), reservedness (α=0.83) and social non-conformity (α=0.72). For evidence of convergent validity, higher PSRS scores were associated with increased sensitivity to social rejection (r=0.23, p elevated depressive symptoms (r=0.13, p=0.012) and negatively correlated with resistance to peer influence (r=–0.13, p=0.013). Local perceived social status significantly moderated the relationship between PSRS scores and depressive symptoms (β=0.005, SE=0.002, t=2.36, p=0.019). A general sense of belonging did not moderate this relationship.

Our results confirm that social risk is not a uniform construct but is instead multidimensional. The PSRS offers a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional social risk-taking, with strong internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The interaction between depression and local perceived social status highlights the importance of perceived status on social risk perception.

This study aimed to examine how older adults form beliefs about their memory and how these beliefs are influenced by their level of concern about dementia. Inaccurate beliefs and excessive worrying, indicative of erroneous metacognition, are associated with negative health outcomes. This research can help identify mitigation for these harmful effects.

Qualitative focus groups; thematic analysis.

Focus group discussion with healthy older adults hosted at a university in central London.

35 healthy older individuals (women=29) without any psychiatric or neurological diagnoses, over the age of 65 years (mean 75.31, SD: 6.15). 13 participants were identified as having a high level of worry about dementia and 22 as having low worry. Groups were matched for cognitive performance on the Telephone Mini Addenbrooke’s cognitive assessment (Tele-MACE).

Participants were assigned to a focus group depending on their level of worry about dementia. During focus groups, a vignette prompted discussion around lifespan changes in memory and how this affected concerns around memory. This allowed investigation of the differences in beliefs about memory.

Thematic analysis revealed two key themes. First, older adults appear to base their definition of ‘normality’ of their own memory on comparisons. These comparisons were between themselves and others and between themselves now and their own past self. Despite similar strategies to define ‘normality’, those with high dementia worry had stricter definitions of what they determined as normal. The second theme described narratives around the ‘self’ and the ‘other’. There was a difference between those with high versus low worry; those with high worry had a strong focus on the ‘self’, while those with low dementia worry focused on ‘others’.

Comparison is a common metacognitive strategy used in forming beliefs about memory. Targeting the use of comparison is potentially valuable in interventions aiming to alleviate older adults’ memory concerns. Addressing self-focused thinking, for example, with cognitive behavioural therapy, could improve harmful levels of high worry.

Parkinson’s disease is a neurological disease with a rising incidence and prevalence. Patients with Parkinson’s disease may receive antipsychotics, for example, due to Parkinson’s disease psychosis. Parkinson’s disease psychosis is characterised by visual hallucinations and other psychotic symptoms. To date, no systematic review has evaluated the effects of antipsychotics in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Therefore, this review aims to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of antipsychotics for Parkinson’s disease.

This is a protocol for a systematic review. A search specialist will perform a search in major medical databases (eg, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)) and clinical trial registries. Published and unpublished randomised clinical trials comparing antipsychotics to any control (placebo, standard care or other antipsychotics) in patients with Parkinson’s disease will be included. Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessments with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool—V.2. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and significant falls. Secondary outcomes will be hospitalisations, non-serious adverse events, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale total score and psychotic symptoms using any valid symptom scale. Data will be synthesised by aggregate meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. Several subgroup analyses are planned. An eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations) and CiNeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) approach.

This protocol does not include results, and ethics approval is not required for the project. The findings from the systematic review will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

PROSPERO ID: CRD42025633985. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025633985.

As care needs increase in complexity, a shift to people-centred, integrated care is required to meet the full range of health and social care needs of clients. However, limited opportunities exist for care providers to develop interprofessional competencies as part of pre-licensing and/or continuing education. New learning models, such as case-based learning (CBL), that facilitate the development of interprofessional competencies and are aligned with practice realities of providers are needed. This scoping review will collate and codify leading practices and knowledge gaps in the development and delivery of CBL programmes in pre-licensing and continuing education for health and social care providers.

A scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, ERIC Institute of Education Sciences, PsycINFO and Education Source will be searched for peer-reviewed literature; Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Web of Science will be searched for grey literature. Reference lists of full-text scholarly sources, key journals and authors will be searched manually. Study selection and extraction will be conducted by two independent reviewers. English sources published between 2014 and 2024 that discuss CBL epistemologies, characteristics, delivery mechanisms, programme limitations and/or programme evaluation in health and social care pre-licensing and/or professional training will be included. Data will be analysed using directed content analysis and synthesised as a narrative summary.

This scoping review protocol was reviewed by the Southlake Health Research Ethics Board and received ethics exemption. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conferences, professional networks and social media, and used to inform the development of an evidence-based training programme for health and social care providers.

Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6YXHN

Despite the potential benefits of physiotherapy and physical activity, awareness remains limited among patients with sequela and healthcare professionals. This study aims to explore Danish physiotherapists’ (PTs) perspectives on barriers, facilitators and potential solutions to improve the care of sequelae after cancer in physiotherapy clinics.

This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with Danish PTs, following a published research protocol and the Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Danish-speaking PTs working in private clinics in Denmark were eligible to participate and were selected via purposive sampling. Online interviews with PTs were conducted in June and July 2022.

A phenomenological approach was employed for data collection and thematic analysis, allowing researchers to set aside preconceptions. Preunderstandings were stated and revisited post-analysis for validation. The interview guide was developed and validated through discussions and pilot testing. A patient panel provided feedback on the interview guide. Interviews were conducted by a trained and experienced PT and transcribed using a standardised key.

Online interviews with 12 PTs were conducted. Five themes were identified: being aware of important physiotherapy competencies, PTs’ basic education and specialisation, patients’ resources, healthcare system and organisation, and sharing knowledge regarding sequelae from cancer and potential treatments. PTs emphasised the need for specialised competencies, emotional resilience and life experience. Patients experienced financial and psychosocial barriers, while systemic issues and poor communication hindered care. PTs suggested public lists of specialised providers and broader dissemination of knowledge to reduce stigma and improve access.

PTs identify clinical and systemic challenges requiring specialisation, improved collaboration and increased awareness to enhance rehabilitation and quality of life for cancer survivors.

Most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for assessing and managing people’s chronic pain focus on specific pain conditions, body sites or life course stages. This creates complexity for clinicians making care choices in the absence of a diagnosis and/or where a person experiences more than one pain condition. Specific to this context is the ICD-11 classification of chronic primary pain where an experience of pain cannot be better accounted for by another condition. CPGs for chronic primary pain, agnostic to condition or body part, may support clinicians towards best pain care since many of the principles of person-centred chronic pain care are transdiagnostic. The two aims of this systematic review are to (1) identify and appraise CPGs for chronic primary pain, relevant across the life course and (2) map the CPG content against a pain care priority framework to evaluate the extent to which the CPG content aligns with the priorities of people with lived chronic pain experience.

We will systematically search nine scholarly databases, the Epistemonikos database and international and national guidelines clearinghouses. CPGs published within 2015–2025, in any language, that offer recommendations about assessment and/or management of chronic primary pain for people of any age, excluding hospitalised inpatients or institutionalised populations, will be included. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen citations for eligibility and appraise CPG quality and implementation potential using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE)-II and the AGREE-Recommendations Excellence tools, respectively. Data extraction will include the citation and scope characteristics of each CPG, methods used to develop recommendations, verbatim recommendations, guiding principles or practice information and narrative excerpts related to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) considerations (or equivalent). We will use the PROGRESS-PLUS framework as a checklist to identify whether determinants of health equity were considered by guideline developers. CPG recommendations will be organised according to common topics and categorised in a matrix according to strength and direction. Qualitative content analysis will be used to synthesise excerpts relating to GRADE EtD considerations (or equivalent), and we will map extracted data against an established chronic pain care priority framework to determine the extent to which the CPGs align with values and preferences of people with lived experience. Interpretation will be informed by an interdisciplinary Advisory Group, including lived experience partners.

Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. Results will be disseminated through publication in an open-access peer-reviewed journal, through professional societies, and integrated into education curricula and public-facing resources. Reporting will be consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.

CRD420251000482.

Patient engagement (PE), or a patient’s participation in their healthcare, is an important component of comprehensive healthcare delivery, yet there is not an existing, publicly available, measurement tool to assess PE capacity and behaviours. We sought to develop a survey to measure PE capacity and behaviours for use in ambulatory healthcare clinics.

Measure development and psychometric evaluation.

A total of 1180 adults in the USA from 2022 to 2024, including 1050 individuals who had indicated they had seen a healthcare provider in the prior 12 months who were recruited nationally via social media across three separate samples; 8 patient advisors and healthcare providers recruited from a large, midwestern US Academic Medical Center; and 122 patients recruited from five participating ambulatory clinics in the Midwestern USA.

An initial survey was developed based on a concept mapping approach with a Project Advisory Board composed of patients, researchers and clinicians. Social media was then used to recruit 540 participants nationally (Sample 1) to complete the initial, 101-item version of the survey to generate data for factor analysis. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to assess model and item fit to inform item reduction, and subsequently conducted cognitive interviews with eight additional participants (patient advisors and providers; Sample 2), who read survey items aloud, shared their thoughts and selected a response. The survey was revised and shortened based on these results. Next, a test–retest survey, also administered nationally via another round of social media recruitment, was administered two times to a separate sample (n=155; Sample 3), 2 weeks apart. We further revised the survey to remove items with low temporal stability based on these results. For clinic administration, research staff approached patients (n=122; Sample 4) in waiting rooms in one of five ambulatory clinics to complete the survey electronically or on paper to determine feasibility of in-clinic survey completion. We engaged in further item reduction based on provider feedback about survey length and fielded a final revised and shortened survey nationally via a final round of social media recruitment (n=355; Sample 5) to obtain psychometric data on this final version.

Cronbach’s alphas, intraclass correlations (ICCs), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR).

The final PE Capacity Survey (PECS) includes six domains across two scales: ‘engagement behaviours’ (ie, preparing for appointments, ensuring understanding, adhering to care) and ‘engagement capacity’ (ie, healthcare navigation resources, resilience, relationship with provider). The PECS is 18 questions, can be completed during a clinic visit in less than 10 minutes, and produces scores which demonstrate acceptable internal consistency reliability (α=0.72 engagement behaviours, 0.76 engagement capacity), indicating items are measuring the same overarching construct. The scales also had high test–retest reliability (ICC=0.82 behaviours, 0.86 capacity), indicating stability of response over time, and expected dimensionality with high fit indices for the final scales (behaviours: CFI=0.97; RMSEA=0.07; SRMR=0.05; capacity: CFI=0.99; RMSEA=0.06; SRMR=0.06), indicating initial evidence of construct validity.

The PECS is the first known measure to assess patients’ capacity for engagement and represents a step toward informing interventions and care plans that acknowledge a patient’s engagement capacity and supporting engagement behaviours. Future work should be done to validate the measure in other languages and patient populations, and to assess criterion-related validity of the measure against patient outcomes.

Communication is a professional competence that all paediatric healthcare professionals must learn and maintain to provide age and developmentally appropriate care. Child-centred communication encourages direct communication with children and adolescents, incorporating the use of play as a communicative strategy. Still, many paediatric healthcare professionals receive little or no formal training in communication and play. A critical barrier to communication training is the limited possibilities for healthcare professionals to take time from their clinical duties. Moreover, few randomised controlled trials have evaluated educational programmes on communication and play for paediatric healthcare professionals, and existing programmes vary significantly in design and duration. This study aims to compare the effects of a 45-min and a 3-hour educational intervention for healthcare professionals on age-appropriate communication and the use of play in clinical paediatric practice.

We will describe a single-centre, randomised, controlled, two-arm, non-inferiority trial. We will recruit 150 healthcare professionals with different professional backgrounds who will be randomised to one of two arms: a 45-min or 3-hour educational intervention on communication and play in paediatric clinical practice. The primary outcome will be their self-efficacy in patient-centredness at 12-week post-intervention, while secondary outcomes will be self-efficacy immediately after the intervention, motivation to engage in the educational activity, cognitive load, self-evaluated knowledge, satisfaction and the impact on individual practice and training needs. Data will be collected through questionnaires at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 12 weeks post-intervention and will be analysed using linear mixed models with random effects to account for clustering and within-subject correlation.

The Danish Data Protection Agency approved the study (P-2020–1144), which will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal and presented at international conferences.

NCT06859632 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

The emergency department (ED) often serves as a crucial pathway for cancer diagnosis. However, little is known about the management of patients with new suspected cancer diagnoses in the ED. The objective of this study was to explore emergency physicians’ experiences in managing patients with a newly suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED.

Between January and April 2024, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Interviews were conducted by trained research personnel using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. The interview transcripts were coded and thematic analysis was used to uncover key themes.

Emergency physicians practising in Ontario, Canada.

20 emergency physicians were interviewed. Four themes around the management of patients with new suspected cancer diagnoses in the ED were identified: (1) healthcare system-level factors that impact suspected cancer diagnosis through the ED, (2) institutional and provider-level challenges associated with managing patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED, (3) patient-level characteristics and experiences of receiving a cancer diagnosis in the ED and (4) the need for care coordination for patients with suspected cancer in the ED.

Physicians experienced several unique challenges in managing patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED. Overall, the findings of this study suggest these challenges often make the ED a difficult environment in which to deliver a suspected cancer diagnosis.

Video games have been linked to a range of positive and negative effects on the mental health of adolescents and young adults. However, to better understand how games affect the mental health of young people, their use and experiences must be situated in the sociocultural and personal life contexts of individuals. Drawing from a cultural-ecosocial approach, this study combines cross-sectional and digital phenotyping measures to examine the effects of video games on the mental health of youth.

Participants will be young people aged 16–25 years from the community and living in the province of Quebec, Canada. An initial sample of 1000 youth will complete a cross-sectional survey online, including measures of socio-demographic context, gaming practices and experiences, streaming practices and experiences, as well as personality and well-being. Qualitative questions will explore personal views on games and mental health. A subsample of 100 participants will be selected for digital phenotyping, including daily surveys of well-being, gaming, streaming and social experiences, combined with passive mobile sensing (eg, geolocation). Analyses will include regression and mixed models for quantitative data, reflexive thematic analysis for qualitative data, and an integration of quantitative and qualitative results using participatory methods.

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of McGill University (24-02-015). The dissemination of results will be conducted in partnership with a multi-stakeholder advisory committee, including youth who play video games, and will involve peer-reviewed publications, presentations to policymakers in Quebec, and workshops for clinicians and researchers.

Cluster analysis, a machine learning-based and data-driven technique for identifying groups in data, has demonstrated its potential in a wide range of contexts. However, critical appraisal and reproducibility are often limited by insufficient reporting, ultimately hampering the interpretation and trust of key stakeholders. The present paper describes the protocol that will guide the development of a reporting guideline and checklist for studies incorporating cluster analyses—Transparent Reporting of Cluster Analyses.

Following the recommended steps for developing reporting guidelines outlined by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network, the work will be divided into six stages. Stage 1: literature review to guide development of initial checklist. Stage 2: drafting of the initial checklist. Stage 3: internal revision of checklist. Stage 4: Delphi study in a global sample of researchers from varying fields (n=) to derive consensus regarding items in the checklist and piloting of the checklist. Stage 5: consensus meeting to consolidate checklist. Stage 6: production of statement paper and explanation and elaboration paper. Stage 7: dissemination via journals, conferences, social media and a dedicated web platform.

Due to local regulations, the planned study is exempt from the requirement of ethical review. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. The checklist with explanations will also be made available freely on a dedicated web platform (troca-statement.org) and in a repository.

A spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts synaptic connections between the corticospinal tract and motor neurons, impairing muscle control below the injury site. Many individuals with an SCI have impaired trunk control, affecting the performance of activities of daily living and quality of life. Work has shown improvements in trunk control after home-based, unsupervised arm-crank exercise training (ACET) in people with chronic motor-incomplete SCI. However, no studies have examined ACET’s impact on trunk control in individuals with subacute SCI. This study aims to investigate ACET’s effects on trunk control in adults with subacute incomplete SCI, and its mechanisms, and its long-term benefits on neuropathic pain, psychological well-being, physical activity levels and health-related quality of life.

This multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will evaluate self-directed ACET in 60 individuals with subacute SCI (

This study was approved by The Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (22/NS/0054). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Findings will be presented at National and International conferences for researchers and clinicians. Finally, results will be disseminated to the SCI community.

ISRCTN17247972