Providing peer support can benefit youth peer support workers (peers)et by supporting self-determination, recovery and resilience to self-stigma. There is a need to clarify the role of the organisation in providing benefits for peers. We aimed to identify the organisational contexts and mechanisms that result in the creation of healthy workplaces for peers.

Rapid realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-Narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards guidelines and Pawson’s iterative approach.

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, SocINDEX, Google Scholar and Embase were searched from 1979 to 2025.

We included qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies and grey literature that captured characteristics of organisational practices and employment considerations in youth peer support programmes.

Articles were screened independently by multiple reviewers. Inclusion criteria were adjusted to capture literature on organisational practices, and employment considerations for youth peer support programmes. Data were extracted and analysed retroductively to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs).

Five employment-related risks to peer well-being were identified: (1) difficulty entering the job market, (2) lack of role clarity, (3) pressure to live up to ideals, (4) retraumatisation and (5) stigma. Six CMOCs were developed; all focused on the creation of equitable employment and supporting peer development and empowerment were developed.

Community-based mental health organisations can facilitate equitable peer employment through strategies that reduce professional stigma, enhance peer resilience and promote professional and personal development. Policy reform that addresses precarious work conditions is needed to support healthy work environments.

Many patients who are extubated after receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure experience extubation failure (ie, require reintubation hours to days after extubation). High-quality evidence shows that extubating patients directly to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC), rather than conventional low-flow oxygen, can prevent extubation failure. These guideline-recommended interventions, however, require care coordination involving multiple intensive care unit (ICU) team members and are infrequently used. Interprofessional education (IPE), which teaches members of multiple professions together, could effectively address this implementation gap in complex, team-based, critical care settings, particularly when paired with a customisable protocol.

This batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness–implementation trial will test three hypotheses: (1) when compared with traditional online education (OE), IPE increases implementation of preventive postextubation respiratory support, (2) the benefits of IPE are increased when paired with a clinical protocol and (3) preventive postextubation NIV for high-risk patients and preventive postextubation HFNC for low-risk patients reduce in-hospital mortality when compared with conventional postextubation oxygen therapy. The trial will recruit 24 clusters made up of one or more ICUs that care for at least 100 mechanically ventilated patients per year in a large multihospital health system in the USA. All clusters will receive OE, IPE and a clinical protocol, with timing determined by randomisation. We will also randomise half of the clusters to education promoting postextubation NIV for patients at high risk of extubation failure and preventive, postextubation HFNC for patients at lower risk, whereas the other half will be randomised to education promoting postextubation HFNC for all eligible patients. We will include all patients who are invasively mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours. The primary implementation endpoint is the rate of use of postextubation NIV or HFNC among eligible participants. The primary clinical endpoint is in-hospital mortality truncated at 60 days from intubation.

This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pittsburgh and an independent data safety monitoring board. We describe the methods herein using the Standard Protocol Items for Randomised Trials framework and discuss key design decisions. We will disseminate results to participating healthcare providers, through publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal and via presentations at international conferences.

NCT05523479.