To identify and prioritise research uncertainties regarding the assessment, management and rehabilitation of patients with problematic hip replacements through a national Priority Setting Partnership (PSP).

A national PSP using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology.

UK.

Patients, carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the care of patients with problematic hip replacements.

A steering group was established. The James Lind Alliance methodology was followed throughout. A nationwide survey was conducted to collect unanswered questions. These were refined, prioritised through an interim survey and ranked at a final consensus workshop.

The initial survey yielded 201 questions, refined to 32. The interim survey had 191 respondents, leading to 19 questions at the final workshop. The top 10 research priorities were agreed on.

This PSP identified key research priorities for problematic hip replacements, focusing on diagnosis, pain management, perioperative optimisation and infection. These priorities can inform researchers and funders to improve outcomes for affected patients.

The Optimising older People’s Transition from acute care Into residential aged care through Multidisciplinary Assessment and Liaison (OPTIMAL) trial is a multisite hybrid type II stepped wedge randomised controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a bundle of evidence-based interventions to provide systematic support to older adults being discharged from hospital to residential aged care (RAC) homes for the first time. The trial is based on evidence from models of care used internationally to improve the quality of care transitions and addresses a need to provide evidence of transferability and effectiveness of these models in the Australian context. The embedded process evaluation will assess the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, adoption and fidelity of the OPTIMAL intervention, as well as the mechanisms of impact.

The OPTIMAL trial will be implemented across the three metropolitan local health networks (LHNs) in South Australia. The process evaluation will be conducted in parallel with the main trial and is theoretically informed by the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) implementation framework, which theorises that the implementation success of OPTIMAL is determined by the facilitation of the intervention with the intended recipients in their inner and outer contextual setting. The process evaluation will employ a mixed methods approach. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected through baseline context mapping of LHNs, interviews with key LHN and RAC stakeholders, online survey of clinical teams, fortnightly check-in forms, and activity logs and field notes maintained by the nurse facilitator in each LHN. Data will be mapped and reported based on the i-PARIHS framework.

Ethical approval for the OPTIMAL trial was obtained from the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (approval 2023/HRE00111), and the relevant governance approvals were obtained for each participating LHN. Ethical approval includes a waiver of the requirement for consent for routinely collected patient data. Study findings will be disseminated via journal publications, presentations at conferences, stakeholder discussions, consumer forums and advocacy to key decision makers to support knowledge translation.

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12624001008516, registered 20 August 2024.

This study investigates the potential of digital health technologies (DHTs), such as wearable devices and smartphones, to complement traditional submaximal functional capacity tests, such as the 6 min walk test (6MWT) and the timed up and go test (TUG). While these traditional tests are widely used due to their simplicity and relevance to daily living activities, they have limitations, including infrequent administration and the need for clinical observation. DHT offers continuous, real-world monitoring, which may accurately reflect patients’ health status and effectively inform clinical decisions. However, there is a need to establish the validity of the data and metrics computed through DHT and understand patient perspectives on using such technology.

This is an observational pilot study (Synergy Digital Health study) that aims at linking wearable data with traditional test outcomes and assessing participants’ acceptance and usage of such DHT. A cohort of 30 cardiovascular patients from Oxford University Hospitals, UK, and 30 community-dwelling elderly people from social centres in Helsingborg, Sweden, will use wearable devices for 2 months in free-living conditions, they will fill out technology acceptance questionnaires (AQs), have baseline assessments and perform physical tests such as the 6MWT and TUG using the Mobistudy smartphone app. Subgroups will participate in codesign workshops to identify experience-based design recommendations for the technology. Quantitative and qualitative methods will be adopted to analyse the collected data.

The study protocol received ethical approval in Sweden from the Etikprövningsmyndigheten (2024-04886-01) and in the UK from the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committees (Iras project ID: 340870), in accordance with local regulations. All participants are asked for written informed consent. The results of the study will be shared via scientific journals and conferences.

Outcome from large vessel occlusion stroke can be significantly improved by time-critical thrombectomy but treatment is only available in regional comprehensive stroke centres (CSCs). Many patients are first admitted to a local primary stroke centre (PSC) and require transfer to a CSC, which delays treatment and decreases the chance of a good outcome. Access to thrombectomy might be improved if eligible patients could be identified in the prehospital setting and selectively redirected to a CSC. This study is evaluating a new specialist prehospital redirection pathway intended to facilitate access to thrombectomy.

This study is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations. Clusters are ambulance stations (or teams) which are work bases for ambulance practitioners. Intervention allocated ambulance practitioners use the Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (‘SPEEDY’) pathway which comprises initiation according to specific criteria followed by contact with CSC staff who undertake a remote assessment to select patients for direct CSC admission. Control allocated ambulance practitioners continue to provide standard care which comprises admission to a local PSC and transfer to a CSC for thrombectomy if required. A co-primary outcome of thrombectomy treatment rate and time from stroke symptom onset to thrombectomy treatment will evaluate the impact of the pathway. Secondary outcomes include key aspects of emergency care including prehospital/hospital time intervals, receipt of other treatments including thrombolysis, and performance characteristics of the pathway. A broad population of all ambulance practitioner suspected and confirmed stroke patients across participating regions is being enrolled with a consent waiver. Data about SPEEDY pathway delivery are captured onto a study case record form, but all other data are obtained from routine healthcare records. Powered on a ‘primary analysis population’ (ischaemic stroke patients with pathway initiation criteria), 894 participants will detect an 8.4% difference in rate and data from 564 thrombectomy procedures will detect a 30 minute difference in time to treatment. The full study population is estimated to be approximately 80 000. Regression modelling will be used to examine primary and secondary outcomes in several analysis populations. The economic analyses will include cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analyses, and calculation of willingness to pay at a range of accepted threshold values. The process evaluation involves semi-structured interviews with professionals and patient/family members to explore views and experiences about the SPEEDY pathway.

This study has ethical, Health Research Authority and participating NHS Trust approvals.

Dissemination of study results will include presentations at national and international conferences and events, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and plain English summaries for patient/public engagement activities.

ISRCTN77453332.

Drug poisoning, caused predominantly by fentanyl in the unregulated drug supply, is the leading cause of death among persons 10–59 years in British Columbia (BC), Canada. In March 2020, in response to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the province of BC released the Risk Mitigation Guidance (RMG) as a clinical tool for physicians and nurse practitioners, allowing prescribers to provide selective withdrawal management medications, such as hydromorphone, dextroamphetamine, diazepam and others, as a legal and regulated supply of pharmaceutical alternatives to individuals who were at-risk of COVID-19 and overdose. In July 2021, the government of BC released the prescribed safer supply (PSS) policy, extending the scope beyond the COVID-19 pandemic and initial medications offered under the RMG. Recent studies have shown clear benefits among people with a diagnosed opioid use disorder who were prescribed PSS, in reducing mortality, as well as improving retention on opioid agonist treatment for those who were coprescribed PSS medications. The objective of the analysis detailed in this protocol is to use a cross-model comparison approach, comparing two independently developed models which are currently used in public health institutions in BC, to estimate the impact of this policy on opioid overdose-related mortality, while also considering the potential negative impacts of PSS medication diversion to those who are opioid naïve. This project will add to the limited evidence-base on the population-level impact of pharmaceutical alternatives interventions to date.

We have identified two appropriate mathematical models to evaluate the impact of PSS on the number of opioid overdose-related deaths within BC from the inception of the programme (March 2020) until December 2022. We will use recently established guidelines on conducting a cross-model comparison to identify structural and parameter differences between the models and perform adaptation steps to generate the counterfactual scenarios. These will include creating additional health states for the population representing individuals receiving PSS, and parameterising the overdose risk, mortality and retention in the new compartments from a comprehensive population-level data set. Harmonisation will be conducted to ensure that both models evaluate the same scenarios with the same data. Further sensitivity analyses will be conducted to consider alternative counterfactual scenarios and changes to the population following the implementation of the intervention.

This study is exempt from research ethics board review, as outlined in the Tri-Council Policy Statement, because it relies on data that is available in the public domain and there is no possibility of identifying individual persons. Results of the model validation analysis will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals and knowledge translation materials posted on the websites of the BC Centre for Disease Control and Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes.

https://osf.io/kju2p/overview.

Declined donor organs and explanted recipient organs may hold considerable value for biomedical research, particularly in advancing knowledge of disease mechanisms and supporting drug development. However, public perceptions of such use, and preferences for how consent should be obtained, remain underexplored.

Four workshops were held across the UK to examine the views of organ donor families and transplant recipients regarding the use of human organs in research, with a focus on myocardial regeneration. Each workshop included three brief presentations on transplantation and cardiac regeneration, followed by facilitated small-group discussions. Observational notes were taken to capture participants’ perspectives on the use of organs unsuitable for transplantation. A follow-up survey generated both quantitative and qualitative data, the latter analysed using thematic analysis.

Participants expressed strong support for the use of declined donor and explanted recipient organs in research. Transplant recipients frequently cited a desire to give back to the National Health Service (NHS), while donor families viewed research use as a meaningful way to honour their loved ones when transplantation was not possible.

This exploratory study highlights widespread support for using non-transplantable organs in research among individuals with personal experience of transplantation. The findings suggest a need for further research into how best to support and inform potential donors and families. Participants emphasised the importance of sensitive communication, clear consent processes and transparency regarding the use of donated organs.

We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (the PHaCT study), including a process evaluation to assess the acceptability of a housing-led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) for prison leavers and the use of a trial design. This paper presents the process evaluation findings.

To explore the acceptability of both the intervention and the trial design to participants and those delivering the intervention, and to assess whether the intervention was delivered with fidelity.

A process evaluation following Medical Research Council guidelines. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with participants and CTI caseworkers and observations of intervention delivery. A thematic analysis of interviews and observations was conducted to understand the intervention’s implementation and contextual factors as well as the trial process acceptability.

Participants for the pilot trial were recruited from three prisons in England and Wales where the intervention was being delivered.

While 28 out of 34 trial participants consented to interviews, only one was completed. Seven caseworkers were interviewed.

A housing-led CTI to support people leaving prison at risk of homelessness, involving phased, time-limited support from caseworkers, starting prerelease and continuing postrelease, to help secure stable housing and build independence, without directly providing housing.

The intervention’s acceptability was primarily reflected through the positive feedback and success stories shared by CTI caseworkers, as well as observational data indicating high acceptance among service users. The trial design’s acceptability was challenged by concerns about randomisation and equipoise, with staff viewing randomisation as unethical due to limited support for vulnerable populations. The fidelity to the CTI intervention housing-led approach was adhered to as best as possible; stable housing was prioritised for service users before addressing other needs. Despite these efforts, both sites encountered significant challenges due to limited housing availability and complex systems for securing social housing, particularly for single men leaving prison.

This wider study faced significant challenges which impacted the process evaluation. Despite these issues, the evaluation provides important insights into the challenges of conducting trials on interventions for people leaving prison. The challenges experienced should inform future study designs with similar populations and in similar settings.

ISRCTN46969988.

To determine whether a full-scale randomised control trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a housing led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is feasible and acceptable.

Pilot parallel two-arm individual level RCT, including process evaluation and embedded exploratory health economic evaluation.

Four prisons for men across England and Wales, UK.

Men leaving prison at risk of homelessness and intervention delivery staff.

CTI has four components: (1) pre-engagement phase: assessing the needs of the client and implementing a plan pre-discharge; (2) transition to community: forming relationships and goal setting; (3) try out: encouraging problem-solving and managing practical issues and (4) transfer of care: developing long-term goals and transferring responsibilities to community providers.

Progression criteria: recruitment, retention, acceptability of the processes (CTI and trial method) and fidelity of intervention delivery. We also assessed the completeness of primary, secondary and exploratory outcome measures and estimated intervention costs.

The recruitment progression criterion was met, with 92% (34/37) of approached individuals consenting to participate (target: 50%). However, the overall recruitment target of 80 was not achieved, and retention was low, only 18% (6/34) provided follow-up data, well below the 60% threshold. Retention was hindered by systemic challenges, including changes to prison release policies and reduced probation support. While the CTI model was acceptable to staff and service users, the trial design, particularly randomisation, was not. Intervention fidelity met the progression criteria. Baseline data collection for health economics and resource use was feasible, and intervention costs were estimated.

This pilot trial identified significant challenges to conducting a full-scale RCT of CTI in this context, particularly around retention, trial acceptability and systemic instability. While CTI remains a promising model, a traditional RCT design may not be viable in this setting without substantial structural and ethical adaptations.

ISRCTN46969988.

Inequities in health status exist in New Zealand across the rural–urban spectrum. In parallel, rural–urban differences in health service utilisation vary by service type. Despite the New Zealand public health system being based on principles of universal access, equity and fairness, levels of health expenditure on rural and urban populations are not well understood. The purpose of the study is to undertake a rural–urban analysis of public health system expenditure, based on individual-level service utilisation and national pricing of health service events.

Individual-level service utilisation and pricing will be collated from national collection databases for all eligible users of publicly funded services. The analysis will include calendar years 2017–2024. Descriptive analysis and a two-part generalised linear regression model will be used to identify if rural–urban differences in expenditure exist, and what the association of rurality is with expenditure (if any). The model will also be used to identify geographic regions with expenditure levels that vary from those predicted using regression model weights. As the specific statistical approach will be determined by data attributes, this protocol outlines the intended approach to construct the analytical model.

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Otago Human Research Ethics Committee (HD23/052). Māori consultation has been undertaken with the Ngāi Tahu Research Consultation Committee and will continue throughout the research process.

People without access to recognised and understood speech and/or written communication methods can experience exceptional disadvantage in health settings. This can result in poor health outcomes, lengthier hospital admissions and adverse events, including preventable deaths. Despite numerous attempts to integrate augmentative and alternative communication into health settings, the first-person ‘voice’ of the patient is often not accessible or prioritised, deferring instead to others, such as parents or carers, or the ‘best guess’ by healthcare professionals. The Talking Scrubs project aims to form a bridge to augmentative and alternative communication by locating key communication icons on scrubs (and scrubs/vest) to be used with patients (in and of themselves) and/or to prompt the use of patient individualised communication methods. The paper describes the methodological process for Stage 4 of the project. Prior stages involved investigating the concept, developing and validating instrument measures and co-designing and feasibility pilot testing the scrubs/vests. Stage 4 (this protocol) aligns with the diagnostic process, to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the scrubs intervention at two large, metropolitan medical centres with 5–10 general practitioners, approximately 30 patients and up to 10 flow-on diagnostic screening clinicians such as nurses and phlebotomists. Stage 4 is the first time the instrument measures will be applied and re-tested post-validation.

Using mixed methods, Stage 4 will apply the communication self-efficacy instruments co-designed in Stage 2 and validated in Stage 3 to measure effectiveness of the scrubs intervention by comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention changes in both clinician and patient population groups. Qualitative interviews, agency recorded data and participant journal recordings (optional) will be used to identify feasibility. SPSS V.29 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA) will be applied to analyse participant communication self-efficacy measures and NVIVO V.10 (Lumiverso, Denver, Colorado, USA) to the retrieved qualitative data.

Stages 3 and 4 have ethics approval from the University of South Australia Ethics Committee identification number 206 930 and are registered as a clinical trial with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Research Trials (ANZCRT) with registration number 12625000490471p. Stage 1 (national survey) and Stage 2 (stakeholder focus groups) received ethics approval from Flinders University. Findings will be disseminated through national and international health translation platforms, publications, media and on the Talking Scrubs website.

ANZCRT with the registration number ACTRN12625000490471p.

The Clinical Frailty Scale is an ordinal scale from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) commonly used to assess frailty in older patients. It is simple for clinicians to apply and can help identify patients who may benefit from discussions around end-of-life care. We externally validated the Scale to assess its performance for predicting 90-day mortality in a cohort of admitted older patients who had screened positive for being at risk of nearing the end of life.

We used data from a randomised controlled trial assessing a tailored feedback loop for reducing non-beneficial care. Our study included patients aged 75 and above admitted between May 2020 and June 2021 from 3 Australian hospitals. We assessed whether the Scale could be used in a frail population to identify patients who were at risk of short-term mortality. Predictive performance was assessed using the c-statistic, smoothed calibration curves and decision curves. Models were tested for coefficient stability.

Our dataset contained 4639 patients and 956 deaths within 90 days. The Clinical Frailty Scale had a c-statistic of 0.62 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.64) or 0.63 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.65) by adding age and transforming the Scale using a cubic spline. Risks were underestimated without a non-linear transformation as scores of 8 and 9 had a higher risk that diverged from a linear association. The net benefit of using the tool was greatest between 5 and 8 on the Scale.

The utility of the Clinical Frailty Scale may be as a flag to encourage clinicians to become more comfortable with discussing ageing and death, rather than as a highly discriminating model to classify patients as high risk or low risk. Statistical uncertainty over mortality should not be a barrier to initiating end-of-life care discussions with frail older patients.

Dementia is a chronic and progressive neurological condition characterised by cognitive and functional impairment. It is often associated with multimorbidity and imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems and families, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. In Peru, where dementia cases are increasing rapidly, timely detection and referral for diagnosis is crucial. This protocol is part of the IMPACT Salud project in Peru. Here, we focus on a specific component aimed at validating an mHealth tool for the detection of cognitive and functional impairment and assessing its cost-effectiveness. We will also assess changes in cognitive and functional impairment as well as health economic outcomes over 1 year.

This observational study will be conducted in four geographically diverse regions of Peru. Community health workers are expected to contact approximately 32 000 participants (≥60 years) to apply an mHealth-enabled tool that includes cognitive and functional instruments: Ascertain Dementia 8, Peruvian version of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire. From this large sample, we aim to find 3600 participants and their study partners to enrol and interview at baseline regarding sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyles, comorbidities and health economic data including resource use, costs and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Psychologists, blind to previous results, will assess dementia stage of the participants using an abbreviated Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. At 6-month follow-up, participants will complete a brief health economics questionnaire on resource use, costs and HR-QoL. To validate the accuracy of the detection tool, a subsample of 600 participants who completed the baseline will undergo a gold-standard clinical neuropsychological assessment. This subsample will participate in a 12-month follow-up, including health economics, cognitive and functional impairment tests and the CDR scale. Results will be analysed and presented by cognitive status, site, sex and multimorbidity profile. Finally, data from all stages and external sources will inform a decision model to implement a cost-effectiveness analysis of the detection tool at the national level.

The study received ethics approval in Peru (Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia: CONSTANCIA-CIEI-378-33-23) and in the UK (Imperial College London: ICREC/SETREC reference number 6647445). Informed consent will be obtained from participants and their study partners, considering the participant’s capacity to consent. For illiterate participants, consent will be obtained through a witnessed procedure involving study partners, with a fingerprint obtained instead of a signature. The results will be disseminated through conferences, published articles, public presentations (particularly to those involved in dementia care) and presentations or meetings with local health authorities.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in identifying small and large bowel obstruction and associated complications, including ischaemia and perforation, in adult patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy reporting guidelines.

Ovid MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1946 to 20 February 2025.

The study included randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case–control studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT for bowel obstruction in adults (aged ≥18 years). Only studies published in English were included. Conversely, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts without full data and studies focusing exclusively on paediatric populations or animal models were excluded.

Three reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, CT modality, diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Tau² statistics.

Sixty-five studies with 9418 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT for bowel obstruction were 90% (95% CI 78 to 96; I²=56%, Tau²=0.36) and 88.8% (95% CI 78.0 to 94.8; I²=65%, Tau²=0.35), respectively. For bowel ischaemia, CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 47.0% (95% CI 32.4 to 59.9; I²=0%, Tau²=0.00) and specificity of 85.3% (95% CI 77.9 to 89.5; I²=1%, Tau²=0.45). Multidetector CT (MDCT) outperformed older modalities across all endpoints. Ischaemia was present in 22.05% of all cases, with higher rates in small bowel obstruction. Perforation and mortality rates were 3.98% and 4.40%, respectively. No significant publication bias was detected, and the certainty of evidence was graded as moderate for most diagnostic accuracy outcomes.

CT, particularly MDCT, offers high diagnostic accuracy for bowel obstruction and is a critical tool for detecting serious complications such as ischaemia and perforation. However, sensitivity for ischaemia remains modest. Standardised protocols and prospective studies are needed to enhance early identification and optimise care pathways.

Studies suggest that extreme heat events can have negative effects on mental health. However, characterisation of these effects in urban communities remains limited, and few studies have investigated the potential modifying effects of demographic, clinical and environmental characteristics. The aim of this study is to address this knowledge gap and quantify the impacts of extreme heat on mental health, health service use and mental well-being in vulnerable urban populations.

In this multidisciplinary project, we will assess mental health outcomes in different populations by bringing together two distinct datasets: electronic health record (EHR) data on mental health service users and data from general public participants of Urban Mind, a citizen science project. We will use EHRs from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) and the North London NHS Foundation Trust (NLFT), from six boroughs which collectively cover more than 1.8 million residents in Greater London, to capture mental health service use and mortality among people with existing diagnoses of mental illness across 2008–2023. We will use smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment data from Urban Mind to measure mental well-being in the general population (2018–2023). These datasets will be linked to high-resolution spatiotemporal data on temperature, fine and coarse particulate matter (PM_2.5, PM₁₀), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and density of large mature tree canopy. We will employ novel quasi-experimental designs, including case time series and case-crossover analysis, to examine the impact of extreme heat on mental health and explore effect modification by sociodemographic, clinical and environmental factors, including air pollution and types of green space coverage. We will also develop a microsimulation model combined with the InVEST urban cooling model to assess and forecast the mental health and social care impacts of extreme heat events and the mitigation of these impacts by different green space coverage and pollution-reduction policies. With a core team composed of researchers, community organisations, industry partners and specialist policy experts, this project will consider lived experience, benefit from broad stakeholder engagement and address gaps in policy and practice.

Each component of this project has been approved by the relevant ethics committee (ref RESCM-22/23-6905 for Urban Mind, LRS/DP-23/24-41409 for the co-development of a screening tool, 23/SC/0257 for the SLaM EHRs, and 24/EE/0178 for the NLFT EHRs). Our dissemination plan includes peer-reviewed scientific articles, policy briefs, a practical guide on fostering ecological and human resilience at the neighbourhood level, and a technical guide for planting and improving the growing conditions of large canopy trees.