The effectiveness of humanitarian health and nutrition programmes in Somalia is critically dependent on seamless collaboration and coordination among a diverse array of actors. While existing literature acknowledges broad challenges to coordination such as insecurity, resource competition and fragmentation, a significant gap remains in understanding how these barriers and their corresponding enablers actively manifest in the daily operations and decision-making processes of frontline practitioners.

This study aims to provide a systematic, in-depth exploration of the barriers and enablers influencing collaboration and coordination mechanisms from the perspective of those directly involved in the response.

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Data were analysed using a deductive thematic approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

The study was conducted across the entire territory of Somalia, encompassing its five member states, the capital city Mogadishu, and the self-declared independent state of Somaliland.

A total of 26 participants, including executive directors, health and nutrition programme managers, coordinators from international and national non-governmental organisations (NGOs), government officials and community members, were interviewed.

Key barriers included poor adaptability and high complexity related to collaborative initiatives (intervention characteristics); armed conflicts, climatic shocks, deeply ingrained sociocultural practices and restrictive government policies (outer setting); inadequate information technology infrastructure and hierarchical communication (inner setting); high staff turnover (individual characteristics). Key enablers included strong inter-agency partnerships (outer setting); supportive organisational culture (inner setting); competent and motivated staff (individual characteristics); and robust planning, engaging and evaluation processes (process).

The study highlights the complex contextual factors that impact the effectiveness of collaboration and coordination mechanisms among humanitarianorganisations operating in Somalia. Policymakers should unify governance, agencies prioritise localisation and donors allocate quotas to local NGOs to enhance aid delivery.

Increasing reports of life-threatening complications in young children exposed to skin-lightening products present a significant public health concern, yet this issue remains under-researched.

To determine the prevalence, maternal perceptions and predictors of early childhood exposure to skin-lightening products among mothers in Southwestern Nigeria.

A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study.

Three randomly selected government-owned primary healthcare facilities in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Three hundred and sixty-nine mothers aged ≥18 years, each with at least one child under 5, recruited by simple random sampling. Data were collected between May and July 2024 using pretested, interviewer–administer semistructured questionnaires. Mothers with acutely ill children were excluded.

Primary outcome was the use of skin lightening products on children while secondary outcomes included maternal use, perceptions and sociodemographic/familial predictors.

Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 54 years (mean: 30.92±6.11 years). Overall, 19.5% (n=72) mothers practised early childhood skin lightening, with 80.6% of exposed children

This study highlights a high prevalence of early childhood exposure to lightening products in a semiurban Nigerian community, with maternal use emerging as a key associated factor. Although awareness of potential health risks was common, aesthetic preferences for lighter skin tones appeared to outweigh safety concerns. These findings highlight the need for culturally sensitive interventions and further research to inform strategies that promote safer childhood skin-care practices.

Our objective was to examine the barriers and facilitators encountered by primary and secondary healthcare professionals when collaborating at the care continuum between primary and secondary care. We aimed to identify specific challenges, observed benefits and proposed changes. By analysing these experiences and identifying opportunities for redesign, we aimed to define specific domains that could improve collaboration, thereby supporting sustainable access to and quality of care in the face of rising demand and constrained resources.

A qualitative exploratory study using semi-structured interview data guided by two domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), including Inner Setting—Tension for Change and Individual Characteristics, as well as selected implementation outcomes defined by Proctor et al, all viewed through a service (re)design lens.

Consultation and communication between primary and secondary healthcare professionals in a Dutch urbanised area.

37 users of collaboration services (eg, telephone, correspondence) were interviewed between August 2021 and October 2022, including 14 general practitioners (GPs) (10 females, 4 males) and 23 specialists (10 females, 13 males).

Four key domains with subthemes, subdivided per operation and CFIR domain, were identified as central to optimising the collaboration of professionals within the primary-secondary care continuum: (1) software and record integration; (2) seamless personal interaction; (3) eliminating a sense of ‘us vs them’ and (4) gaps in continuity of care.

This study reveals that healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care face similar collaboration challenges due to system-level issues and inadequate collaboration tools, leading to increased workload, miscommunication and reduced quality of care. Improving collaboration between GPs and specialists requires not only adjustments to individual services, but a comprehensive overhaul of the referral and back-referral process. A more integrated approach, addressing key domains, is crucial for enhancing care quality, streamlining workflows and improving health outcomes.

Health systems must guarantee access to quality, safe and effective medicines. Essential medicine lists (EMLs) are crucial prioritisation tools to inform coverage decisions and steward limited health resources under the context of universal healthcare. This study aims to develop a consolidated framework for prioritising the assessment of health technologies to review and update EML for treating diseases or health problems managed in primary healthcare (PHC).

A mixed-methods approach was designed to validate the framework. An initial scoping systematic review will be conducted to search for studies that describe criteria used to prioritise the assessment of health technologies for PHC. The relevant studies will be examined using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework for scoping review studies. A comprehensive search was conducted in the following sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library (LILACS, WHO IRIS, IBECS, PAHO-IRIS, PAHO, LIS, BRISA), Health System Evidence, Global Healths, Health Evidence and Epistemonikos from the inception until February 2025. Two review authors will screen and extract data independently. The extracted data will be qualitatively analysed and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form, alongside a narrative summary, in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. An iterative process online using the Delphi hybrid with stakeholders through predetermined consensus thresholds, a combination of a four-point Likert scale and open-ended questions will be conducted to select and validate the criteria identified in the scoping review.

We will provide a consolidated framework to inform decision-makers for prioritising the assessment of health technologies for the national EML for PHC. This is an important step in using evidence to inform public health policies. We plan to share findings through a variety of means, including publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at national conferences, invited workshops and webinars, email discussion lists affiliated with our institutions and professional associations, and academic social media.

To evaluate the patterns of abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) follow-up testing for the detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australian general practices.

Retrospective, population-based observational study.

2 717 966 adults who visited a MedicineInsight participating general practice between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, had ≥1 serum creatinine measurement (with or without a UACR measurement) and did not have CKD at baseline.

‘Guideline-concordant follow-up’ was defined as having a record of a repeat eGFR or UACR testing (assessed separately) within 6 months following the abnormal (eGFR2; UACR≥2.5 mg/mmol in males, ≥3.5 mg/mmol in females) incident result. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with receiving appropriate follow-up testing.

A total of 220 841 and 114 889 patients with an abnormal incident eGFR and UACR result, respectively, were identified. Nearly half (45.0%) of the patients with an abnormal eGFR result and over two-thirds (69.7%) of the patients with an abnormal UACR result did not have a follow-up test within 6 months. Patient factors associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up eGFR testing included indicators of poorer baseline health and greater CKD risk, such as comorbid diabetes (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.40) or more severe incident eGFR (adjusted ORs for eGFR categories 30–44, 15–29 and

In this large, population-based study, we observed substantial gaps in the follow-up of abnormal eGFR and UACR for the detection of CKD in primary care settings. Effective strategies to optimise follow-up testing for CKD detection are needed.

There is high interest in long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), with many conveniences for uptake and persistence. However, both patients and clinicians have expressed important barriers to effective implementation, including concerns about frequent clinic visits and strain on clinic resources. Administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector (such as family, friend or partner of the patient) can help mitigate some of these patient-identified and clinician-identified barriers. Alternative LAI-ART delivery methods have the potential to increase the PWH and layperson injector’s confidence, empowerment, convenience, privacy and self-management skills and ultimately facilitate LAI-ART uptake and persistence.

INVITE-Home (innovative administration of long-acting injectables for HIV treatment enhancement at home) will support the expansion of LAI-ART in non-clinical settings by developing, implementing and evaluating a comprehensive, theory-informed training to support the administration of LAI-ART by a trained layperson injector. First, INVITE-Home will design and develop an innovative, theory-based layperson injector training to improve acceptability and uptake of LAI-ART in home-based settings, grounded in qualitative evaluation of training barriers and needs of PWH, layperson injectors and clinicians to develop the training. In Aim 2, INVITE-Home will enhance understanding of home-based LAI-ART using the training, by examining implementation and effectiveness of home-based LAI-ART injections.

This study and its protocols have been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Institutional Review Board and the scientific staff of HIV Research Branch, Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Study staff will disseminate findings locally (eg, to partnering clinics, via the UCSF Center for AIDS Prevention Studies’ Community Engagement Core), statewide (eg, the California Department of Public Health’s Office of AIDS) and nationally at conferences related to HIV.

NCT06488846.

To assess the quality of amoxicillin products in Indonesia’s private market by surveying the range of products available across different areas, followed by product sampling and laboratory testing.

A cross-sectional survey employing mystery shoppers to purposively sample the widest possible range of amoxicillin products available to patients across different areas in Indonesia.

Licensed and unlicensed medicine outlets in remote, rural and urban areas and online.

Amoxicillin products that are sold to patients as oral solid and dry liquid formulations.

Quality of amoxicillin products, assessed using compendial testing of active pharmaceutical ingredient content and dissolution. Samples that failed any quality test were classified as substandard or out-of-specification (OOS). The raw prevalence of substandard amoxicillin was adjusted based on the national market volume of each product variant.

We surveyed 476 outlets, mostly pharmacies (68.5%), websites (19.7%) and drug stores (10.9%). Among the 120 collected samples, there were 59 distinct products, collectively representing 95% of the estimated market volume for oral solid products and 65% for dry syrups. 12 out of 110 oral solid samples tested OOS (10.9%), as did 3 out of 10 dry syrups (30%). The samples that failed originated from various areas and types of outlets. We found no relation between the price and quality of amoxicillin.

The oral solid amoxicillin products that tested OOS represent an estimated 12.7% of the national market volume. We found no relation between the price and quality of amoxicillin. Combining product-variety sampling with data on market volume presents a promising approach to gain insight into the prevalence of poor-quality medical products using a relatively small sample size.