Post-COVID syndrome manifests with a diverse array of symptoms for which no standard care plan currently exists. Many questions were raised by patients, which underscored the need for a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Therefore, a post-COVID module was developed to be included in the Assessment of Burden of Chronic Conditions (ABCC-) tool. The ABCC-tool evaluates and visualises the perceived physical, emotional and social burden of one or multiple chronic disease(s) using a balloon diagram and aims to facilitate person-centred care and structured discussions between patients and healthcare professionals. This study explores the patients’ perspective on the content of the ABCC-tool for post-COVID and the tool’s usability in a home-based setting.

All patients who completed the ABCC-tool for post-COVID were invited for an online semi-structured interview. We selected post-COVID patients who had used the tool in the past three months. Interviews were audio recorded and analysed using a thematic approach with Atlas.ti version 23.

Nineteen post-COVID patients (10 males, mean age 56) were interviewed between May and August 2024. The tool was regarded as user-friendly, and patients indicated they would use the tool again in the future. Patients valued the tool’s broad range of topics, some of which are often overlooked in standard healthcare consultations. The tool was comprehensible and relevant according to all patients. The balloon diagram was easy to understand, but a legend explaining the colours of the balloons was preferred. Other suggestions for improvement included adding open-text fields and periodic reminders to increase usability and adding long-term data.

The ABCC-tool is a promising instrument for post-COVID patients, offering a structured way to monitor and communicate experienced burden in addition to standard healthcare consultations. Refinements addressing usability and comprehensiveness are recommended to facilitate its integration into clinical practices.

Cognitive impairment is considered a challenge in medication management for both the affected patient as well as their caregiver. Numerous studies have investigated interventions aiming to improve medication therapy safety in this population; however, there is insufficient knowledge on interventions which support patients and caregivers effectively. The aim of this systematic review is to (1) identify interventions to improve medication therapy safety in older patients with cognitive impairment, and (2) to evaluate their effectiveness.

We will conduct a systematic review of literature with participatory elements of public involvement in every step of the process. Five literature databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) will be screened to identify interventions to improve medication therapy safety in older (≥65 years of age) adults with cognitive impairment. To support methodology and evidence synthesis, we will conduct expert panel discussions as well as focus group discussions of caregivers and healthcare professionals. Study selection, data extraction and bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers. For data synthesis, studies will be organised by setting (eg, community setting, hospital setting, nursing home setting).

The responsible Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg granted approval for the public involvement strategies in this project (S-562/2024). Results will be presented by publication in an academic journal and at scientific conferences.

CRD42024623352.

Racialised older adults living with dementia face various challenges and barriers in receiving culturally sensitive care in hospital settings. Stigma, discrimination and healthcare provider bias toward racialised older adults living with dementia infringe on their right to access quality care services in acute hospital settings and can negatively affect their quality of life. Despite the growing need to integrate culturally sensitive dementia care into acute hospital care, little research has been done in this area. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to summarise and map what is known about the hospitalisation experience of racialised older adults with dementia in receiving care and identify research gaps.

We will use Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist to conduct and write the review. The search strategy will use keywords and index terms across selected databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Medline, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and hand-searching the reference lists from chosen literature. Grey literature will be searched using Google and the Alzheimer Society websites to find further evidence and literature. Two researchers will screen the titles and abstracts independently by referring to the inclusion criteria. Data from the extracted studies will be reported in tabular and narrative form that answer the scoping review’s questions. Research gaps and recommendations for future research will be identified and summarised. The review’s results will be shared with stakeholders, policymakers, healthcare professionals and community organisations working with the racialised community and dementia care.

This scoping review does not require ethics approval because it collects data from publicly available resources. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals, professional conferences and with community organisations and healthcare providers.

This review is registered in the Open Science Framework registration link: osf.io/7rfje

This study aimed to describe the experiences of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis among patients with breast cancer. Its primary focus is on how chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis affects day-to-day functioning, psychological wellness and overall quality of life.

12 Jordanian women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer and had presented with chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis were the purposive sample for this qualitative study, which employed in-depth, semistructured interviews. The verbatim transcriptions of the interviews were subjected to thematic analysis.

The thematic analysis of the 12 participants’ reviews revealed five main themes: distressing physical manifestations, eating and nutritional struggles, mouth care difficulties, psychological strain, social and emotional consequences, and coping and adaptation strategies.

Breast cancer patients’ daily routines, mental health and quality of life are all significantly impacted by chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. According to the study, individuals with breast cancer who experience chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis should get patient-centred care and address their emotional, psychological, social and physical discomfort to maximise their outcomes.

Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting up to 11% of people presumed female at birth by the age of 44 years, characterised by the growth of tissue similar to the lining of the uterus on other organs. Endometriosis significantly impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and imposes a substantial burden on both individuals and the healthcare system. International guidelines recommend the interdisciplinary management of endometriosis due to its significant biopsychosocial burden; however, research aimed at exploring psychological approaches for endometriosis is limited. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CodeEndo, an online co-designed interdisciplinary supportive care program, compared with a waitlist control (WLC), on HRQoL and biopsychosocial outcomes in people with a diagnosis of endometriosis.

A hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either the CodeEndo program (n=176) or WLC group (n=176) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be HRQoL, and secondary outcomes will include psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, stress), self-efficacy, menstrual, bladder and gastrointestinal symptoms, pain, fatigue, sleep, exercise, diet, symptom bothersomeness and physical and psychological well-being, measured at 8 weeks post-randomisation (T2) and 6-month follow-up (T3). Cost-effectiveness will also be examined. Longitudinal qualitative individual interviews (up to n=40) will be conducted with participants who complete the CodeEndo program to explore benefits, barriers and facilitators of ongoing use. Additionally, the CodeEndo program will undergo evaluation by a group of endometriosis healthcare providers, who will assess potential barriers and facilitators to its real-world implementation. Various process evaluation strategies will also be measured to inform future implementation. Data analyses will incorporate mixed-effects regression models on an intention-to-treat basis, cost-consequences and cost-utility, dietary and qualitative thematic analysis.

This protocol received ethics approval from Deakin University Research Ethics Committee (DUREC Ref: 2024-157). Dissemination is expected to include peer-reviewed journal articles, reports, conference presentations as well as websites or social media platforms of relevant chronic pain organisations. Participants will be sent a summary of trial results.

ACTRN12623000598684p.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately one in five people over 60 in the UK. In severe cases, revascularisation, such as surgical bypass or endovascular methods, is often required to restore limb perfusion. Between 2000 and 2019, 527 131 revascularisation procedures were carried out in the UK. Postprocedural surveillance is essential to detect restenosis and maintain vessel patency. However, standard surveillance using duplex ultrasound (DUS) is resource intensive. Ankle Doppler waveform assessment is quick, inexpensive and accurate for PAD diagnosis, yet its role in postrevascularisation surveillance remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ankle handheld Doppler waveform assessment (ankle HHD) for detecting restenosis after lower limb revascularisation, as compared with formal DUS.

This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06619223). We aim to recruit 121 people with PAD undergoing planned lower limb revascularisation at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust. Follow-up assessments will take place at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post revascularisation. At each visit, a vascular scientist will perform the index test (Ankle HHD) followed by DUS as the reference standard. A subset of participants will undergo repeat testing to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Restenosis will be defined as one or more arterial lesions of ≥50% stenosis or tandem lesions with a combined value of ≥50%. The primary outcome is the sensitivity of ankle Doppler waveform assessment for detecting restenosis, compared with DUS.

The study has received approval from Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (REC reference 24/LO/0462). Results will be disseminated through research presentations and papers.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06619223.

Sepsis and antibiotic resistance constitute a deadly synergy, causing the loss of millions of lives across the world, with their economic and developmental consequences posing a threat to global prosperity. Their impact is disproportionately felt in resource-limited settings and among vulnerable populations, especially children. A key challenge is prompt diagnosis and timely commencement of appropriate antibiotic therapies. These challenges are compounded in low-income and middle-income countries by a lack of comprehensive epidemiological data, with Nigeria being one such country for which it is lacking. Kaduna is the third largest state in Nigeria, with over 10 million inhabitants, of whom more than half are children under 14 years old. While bacterial sepsis and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are recognised as a growing problem in the state, there are huge gaps in the current understanding of their aetiology. This project employs a cross-sectional design to investigate the clinical and haematological markers of paediatric sepsis, alongside determining the bacterial cause and prevalence of AMR at four high-turnover hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Further, whole-genome sequencing of isolated bacterial pathogens will be performed to determine the genetic features of resistance. This project represents the largest surveillance study of paediatric sepsis in Kaduna to date. Additionally, we aim to use the clinical, haematological, microbiological and genomic data to derive predictive models for sepsis causes, treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

This is a hospital-based, cross-sectional study that will recruit up to 461 children with bacterial sepsis who were admitted at the two teaching and two general hospitals in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Children presenting with features of fever, subnormal temperature and body weakness would be recruited into the study and have their blood samples collected. The blood samples will be used for culture, complete blood count, HIV and malaria testing. Accordingly, we will capture clinical presentation, haematological characteristics, causative pathogen from blood culture and patient outcomes. Nutritional status, known congenital immunosuppressive diseases, HIV infection and malaria infection will also be determined and documented. The bacterial isolates will be phenotypically characterised for AMR and genotypically following whole genome sequencing. Known and potential confounders to the outcomes of bacterial sepsis would be assessed in all participants, and adjustment for confounding would be performed using logistic regression and/or stratification±Mantel-Haenszel estimator where applicable.

Ethical approvals were granted by the University of Birmingham (ERN_2115-Jun2024), the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTHZ/HREC/H45/2023), Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna (NHREC/30/11/21A) and the Kaduna State Ministry of Health (MOH/AD M/744/VOL.1/1110018). The study will be conducted using the international guidelines for good clinical practice and based on the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated via oral and poster presentations in scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed journal articles.

The ventilatory ratio (VR) is a simple and accessible index that reflects ventilatory efficiency in critically ill patients. Although several studies have examined its potential as a prognostic marker in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the results remain inconsistent and inconclusive. This systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between VR and mortality in adult patients with ARDS.

Two investigators will independently conduct systematic literature searches in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature / Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS) databases, covering all publications from database inception to July 2025.

This systematic review and meta-analysis will include prospective and retrospective cohort studies evaluating the association between the VR and mortality in adult patients with ARDS. Specifically, we aim to answer the following Patient, Population or Problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question: In adult patients with ARDS (Population), is an elevated VR (Exposure), compared to lower or normal VR values (Comparison), associated with an increased risk of mortality (Outcome)?

The primary outcome will be mortality, as defined in each included study. Outcomes will be analysed according to the characteristics and reporting of the original publications.

The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A hierarchical Bayesian random-effects model will be used to synthesise the data, with effect sizes expressed as ORs and 95% credible intervals. Weakly informative priors will be applied to model parameters.

Between-study heterogeneity will be assessed through the estimation of the between-study variance (²) and the I² statistic. Subgroup analyses will be conducted based on study design and ARDS aetiology, and a bivariate meta-regression will explore potential effect modifiers. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis will also be performed to assess the robustness of the findings.

Publication bias will be evaluated using a Bayesian funnel plot and an adapted version of Egger’s test.

This systematic review does not require ethics approval. The results will be published in scientific journals, presented at national and international conferences and shared on social media in accessible language.

CRD420251008773

Novel diagnostics, particularly point-of-care (POC) tests, play a crucial role in the early detection and management of infectious diseases, especially in resource-limited settings. Ensuring test performance and quality while minimising the risk of human error becomes more relevant when shifting testing tasks from highly controlled settings like centralised laboratories to people with minimal training. Applying usability and human factors engineering principles can reduce the challenges related to human errors. Despite existing frameworks and tools, the practical application of usability guidelines remains variable across different settings.

This scoping review protocol outlines a systematic investigation of current practices in assessing the usability of novel diagnostics, particularly POC tests for infectious diseases intended for use in low-income and middle-income countries. The review will analyse original research studies of all designs and product dossiers that report on the usability evaluation or validation of a diagnostic test for an infectious disease. A qualitative synthesis of the data extracted from the articles will be conducted. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for this scoping review.

No ethical approval is required because individual patient data will not be included. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and management of influenza-like illnesses (ILIs) in the outpatient and inpatient settings in Vietnam.

A cross-sectional, observational study.

We conducted a questionnaire survey of 407 individuals with ILI symptoms who presented to public community health centres and the paediatric ward of a public hospital in the city of Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam, from December 2022 to March 2023.

Not applicable.

No primary and secondary outcomes were pre-specified because this study was an explanatory study. The basic characteristics of the participants are presented using descriptive statistics. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine the factors associated with the prescription of antibiotics to outpatients with ILIs.

A total of 198 outpatients and 200 inpatients were enrolled in the study. Most inpatients were children under 5 years of age and experienced longer illness durations and higher costs, with almost all patients receiving antibiotics. The rate of antimicrobial prescription for ILIs was 79.3% for outpatients and 99.5% for inpatients. The median health-related quality of life score of participants aged ≥18 years during illness was 0.796 (IQR 0.674–0.922). Logistic regression analysis indicated a negative association between a definite diagnosis of viral infection by rapid diagnostic test and outpatient antibiotic prescription (OR: 0.20, p=0.006).

This study underscores the widespread inappropriate antimicrobial use for ILIs in a community in Vietnam, which contributes to an avoidable economic and health burden. The results of this study suggest that implementing diagnostic tools may support antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Procedure-related pain should be minimised to prevent psychological trauma and the potential negative consequences on body physiology. Dressing changes in paediatric patients with burn injuries are frequently performed with analgesics alone where sedation is not indicated, especially in minor and superficial burns. It is hypothesised that distraction methods can be used in addition to pain alleviating medication to reduce the experience of pain in these patients.

With this research project, we aim to assess the effectiveness of a simple, inexpensive, non-electronic distraction method, a kaleidoscope, to reduce acute pain experienced in paediatric patients undergoing dressing changes in the outpatient clinic.

A randomised controlled trial will be performed at the Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital, Empangeni, South Africa. Paediatric patients between the ages of 5 years and 12 years with minor and superficial partial thickness burn injuries who require dressing changes in the outpatient clinic, without sedation, will be randomised into two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Fixed randomisation will be performed by a computer random number generator. The control group will receive standard practice of care which concerns a dressing change without any distraction methods, and the intervention group will receive distraction by use of a kaleidoscope as an additional method for potential pain alleviation. Patients in both groups will receive paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when indicated according to hospital protocol. The primary outcome will be the change in pain score from pre-procedural to pain score during the dressing change and will be analysed with a linear regression analysis. Additionally, subanalyses will be performed to evaluate potentially modifying factors on the treatment effect. This will also be evaluated with a linear regression analysis and correlated with caregiver and healthcare worker observational pain scores. Participants and assessors are not blinded to group assignment due to the nature of the intervention. To achieve a power of 80% and a level of significance of 5% for detecting at least a 1-point difference in change in pain scores between the intervention and control group, a sample size of 50 patients in each group is required.

This study evaluates a non-invasive adjunct to reduce pain in children who undergo a painful procedure. Ethical approval has been granted from the University of Kwazulu-Natal’s biomedical research and ethics committee and the ethics and research committee of Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital prior to recruitment (ref no. BREC/00005194/2023). Written informed consent will be acquired from all study participants’ caregivers. Study findings will be presented orally to staff at the paediatric burn unit of Ngwelezana Tertiary Hospital (study location). The research methodology and results will be presented at scientific conferences and will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

NCT06591195.

Identity is a determinant of health-promoting behaviours such as physical activity and health-compromising behaviours such as smoking. This scoping review provides a comprehensive synthesis and comparison of the relationship between physical activity- and smoking-related identity and behaviour, and how these identities are defined and measured. Study participants’ personal, physical activity-related and smoking-related characteristics were considered if data were available. The review focuses on people aged 45 and above.

A search across 9 databases yielded 5801 unique publications. Ensuing careful screening, 268 peer-reviewed empirical studies met eligibility criteria, of which 45 concerned participants of 45+ age. Experts in the field contributed to validating and structuring the narrative.

Findings revealed the existence of an intricate, enduring direct and indirect relationship between identity and behaviour for physical activity and smoking. Numerous similarities and differences in this relationship, as well as in identity-related terminology and measurement tools used, were identified. In essence, endorsing an identity related to physical activity and smoking abstinence was found to be important for becoming physically active and quitting smoking successfully, respectively. Identity processes, encompassing identity formation, maintenance, change and loss, were detected as applicable to both physical activity and smoking, although differences were observed between the two behaviours. Characteristics such as gender, age and behavioural history emerged as relevant in shaping smoking-related and physical activity-related identities.

Despite variances, findings suggest that the relationship between identity and behaviour, including associated processes, may not fundamentally differ between health-promoting and health-compromising behaviours. Avenues for future research, including exploring causality between identity and behaviour, are proposed.