To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSoPSC) version 2.0 in Ethiopian public hospitals.
A cross-sectional study.
Five public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.
Healthcare professionals (N=582).
An adapted and contextualised version of HSoPSC 2.0 was used to conduct structural validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA). Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated through item loadings and interfactor correlations, respectively. Reliability was measured using McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha.
CFA indicated a poor model fit for the original 10-factor, 32-item HSoPSC 2.0 across all statistical indices: relative chi-square (²/df=7.71), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA=0.108), standardised root mean square residual (SRMR=0.088), comparative fit index (CFI=0.814) and Tucker-Lewis’s index (TLI=0.780). Consequently, a comprehensive EFA was conducted, which identified a revised model comprising 5-factor, 21-item. This model accounted for 62.8% of the total variance and demonstrated strong construct validity, with excellent fit indices (²/df=3.67, RMSEA=0.068, SRMR=0.034, CFI=0.969, TLI=0.945). Internal consistency, assessed via McDonald’s omega and Cronbach’s alpha, exceeded the acceptable threshold of 0.70 across all dimensions, except for Response to Error (0.66). The convergent and discriminant validity of the new model was confirmed, ensuring an accurate representation of the underlying constructs.
The original HSoPSC 2.0 with 10-factor, 32-item failed to demonstrate structural validity in the Ethiopian healthcare context. In contrast, a revised 5-factor, 21-item model showed strong validity and acceptable reliability. This adapted version provides a culturally and contextually relevant tool for assessing patient safety culture in Ethiopian healthcare settings.
Early-onset chronic liver disease (CLD) and its subsequent clinical progression have systemic impact. Its trajectory coincides with critical periods of brain development. In this study, we will test the hypothesis that early-onset CLD is associated with neurodevelopmental and psychiatric symptoms and delineate their neurobiological underpinnings through multimodal neuroimaging.
This study will recruit 100 patients with biliary atresia and 50 patients with other types of early-onset CLD, aged between 6 and 30 years, under the primary care of Paediatric Liver Services at King’s College Hospital, London, UK. Cognitive performance and autism-related behaviours will be evaluated with neurodevelopmental assessments. Participants and their parents will complete questionnaires addressing neurodevelopmental and psychiatric outcomes in everyday life, and quality of life. Multimodal neuroimaging will be conducted using electroencephalography (EEG); eye-tracking; structural, functional and diffusion MRI; and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Clinical information will be collected from patients’ medical records and bio samples. Data of 222 neurotypical controls and 307 neurodivergent controls without CLD will be pooled from the Longitudinal European Autism Project with a similar study protocol. Neurodevelopmental and psychiatric outcomes will be compared with normative values and between groups. Associations with clinical risk factors will be explored using multivariable regression. Neuroimaging markers will be compared between groups and associations with neurodevelopmental outcomes and clinical risk factors will be tested using multivariable regression. Individual deviation from normal brain development will be quantified using Bayesian modelling and will be associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes.
This study was approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority’s ethical committee (REC reference: 22/PR/1587). Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international conferences and shared with patients and their families for widespread dissemination of the results.
The incidence of anal carcinoma is increasing, with the current gold standard treatment being chemoradiotherapy. There is currently a wide range in the radiotherapy dose used internationally which may lead to overtreatment of early-stage disease and potential undertreatment of locally advanced disease.
PLATO is an integrated umbrella trial protocol which consists of three trials focused on assessing risk-adapted use of adjuvant low-dose chemoradiotherapy in anal margin tumours (ACT3), reduced-dose chemoradiotherapy in early anal carcinoma (ACT4) and dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced anal carcinoma (ACT5), given with standard concurrent chemotherapy.
The primary endpoints of PLATO are locoregional failure (LRF)-free rate for ACT3 and ACT4 and LRF-free survival for ACT5. Secondary objectives include acute and late toxicities, colostomy-free survival and patient-reported outcome measures. ACT3 will recruit 90 participants: participants with removed anal tumours with margins ≤1 mm will receive lower dose chemoradiotherapy, while participants with anal tumours with margins >1 mm will be observed. ACT4 will recruit 162 participants, randomised on a 1:2 basis to receive either standard-dose intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in combination with chemotherapy or reduced-dose IMRT in combination with chemotherapy. ACT5 will recruit 459 participants, randomised on a 1:1:1 basis to receive either standard-dose IMRT in combination with chemotherapy, or one of two increased-dose experimental arms of IMRT with synchronous integrated boost in combination with chemotherapy.
This study has been approved by Yorkshire & The Humber – Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee (ref: 16/YH/0157, IRAS: 204585), July 2016. Results will be disseminated via national and international conferences, peer-reviewed journal articles and social media. A plain English report will be shared with the study participants, patients’ organisations and media.
Commentary on: Douglas C, Alexeev S, Middleton S, Gardner G, Kelly P, McInnes E, et al. Transforming nursing assessment in acute hospitals: A cluster randomised controlled trial of an evidence-based nursing core assessment (the ENCORE trial). International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2024. 2024;151:104690.
Implications for practice and research Introducing training to enhance manual nursing assessment and surveillance has the potential to improve outcomes for hospitalised patients with multimorbidity. Further research is needed to establish which aspects of nursing assessment and surveillance are essential to improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration.
Failure to identify and respond to deteriorating patients is a significant and complex clinical safety issue. There is a growing body of international research evidence which has identified the importance of system and human factors in ‘failure to rescue’ events.
Commentary on: Drennan J, Murphey A, McCarthy VJC, Ball J, Duffield C, Crouch R, Kelly G, Loughnane C, Murphey A, Hegarty J, Brady N, Scott A & Griffiths P. The association between nurse staffing and quality of care in emergency departments: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2024 153, 104 706.
Implications for practice and research Healthcare leaders should place high importance on ensuring adequate levels of nursing staff in emergency departments to reduce serious adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to ascertain safe nurse staffing levels in emergency departments.
There is a substantial body of international evidence, which demonstrates that inadequate nurse staffing is associated with increased mortality and poor patient outcomes in medical and surgical settings.
by Chien-Hsien Kitty Yang, Xiu Ting Yiew, Robert G. Hahn, William Muir, Carolyn Kerr, Shane Bateman
This prospective experimental study evaluated the disposition of a crystalloid and a colloid solution in 10 healthy cats under general anesthesia. Each cat was randomly assigned to receive either 20 mL/kg of a balanced isotonic crystalloid solution (PLA) or 5 mL/kg of 6% tetrastarch 130/0.4 solution (T-HES), administered over 15 minutes, in a 2-period, 2-treatment crossover design. Blood samples were collected, and urine output was measured during a 3-hour experimental period. Plasma dilution was calculated using serial hemoglobin concentrations and red blood cell count. Volume kinetics (distribution and elimination) of each fluid were determined using non-linear mixed effects pharmacokinetic modeling software. Data from a previous study with a similar methodology in healthy conscious cats were included in the population kinetic analysis, revealing anesthesia as a significant covariate for k21 (peripheral-to-central intercompartmental rate constant) for PLA and k10 (dilution-dependent first-order elimination rate constant) for T-HES. Cumulative urine output under general anesthesia was approximately 3.5 times lower for PLA and 2.5 times lower for T-HES compared to conscious cats. Overall, our data suggest that the elimination of PLA and T-HES is markedly reduced, and a bolus of PLA produces a short period of plasma expansion with the potential to cause significant peripheral fluid accumulation in cats during general anesthesia.Commentary on: Roussel M, Teissandier D, Yordanov Y, et al. Overnight stay in the emergency department and mortality in older patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Dec 1;183(12):1378-1385.
Healthcare leaders should place high importance on organisational solutions to prioritise the admission of older patients from emergency departments (EDs) to wards to reduce risks associated with overnight stays. Further evidence is needed to understand if increased risks to older patients in ED also occur at other times and to establish the most effective interventions to mitigate risks.
Crowding and access block in emergency departments (EDs) are pervasive problems of international concern.
Evaluate the relationship between hospital nursing resources and outcomes among patients with chronic wounds.
Cross-sectional observational.
Hospital-level predictors included the nurse work environment, proportion of Bachelor of Science (BSN)-prepared nurses, and skill mix (i.e., registered nurses [RN] as proportion of nursing personnel). Outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day mortality, discharging to a higher level of care and length of stay. Individual-level nurse data were aggregated to create hospital-level measures of nursing resources. We utilised multi-level modelling with nurses nested within hospitals and outcomes at the patient level.
Three datasets from 2021: RN4CAST-New York/Illinois survey, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review claims and American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
The sample included 34,113 patients with chronic wounds in 215 hospitals in New York and Illinois. In adjusted models, a 1 standard deviation improvement in the work environment was associated with 12% lower odds of in-hospital mortality, 8% lower odds of discharging to a higher level of care and a shorter length of stay by a factor of 0.96. A 10% increase in BSN composition was associated with 8% reduced odds of in-hospital mortality and 6% reduced odds of 30-day mortality. A 10% increase in skill mix was associated with 12% lower odds of in-hospital mortality and a shorter length of stay by a factor of 0.91.
Improved nursing resources are associated with better outcomes among patients with chronic wounds.
Nurses manage the care of patients with chronic wounds; thus, hospital investment in nursing resources is imperative for good outcomes.
Modifiable hospital nursing resources are associated with outcomes among patients with chronic wounds, a complex population.
STROBE.
To identify, synthesise and map systematic reviews of the effectiveness of nursing interventions undertaken in a neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery.
This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI scoping review framework.
Review included systematic reviews that evaluated any nurse-initiated interventions that were undertaken in an NICU or SCN setting. Studies that reported one or more positive outcomes related to the nursing interventions were only considered for this review. Each outcome for nursing interventions was rated a ‘certainty (quality) of evidence’ according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.
Systematic reviews were sourced from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence Synthesis for reviews published until February 2023.
A total of 428 articles were identified; following screening, 81 reviews underwent full-text screening, and 34 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Multiple nursing interventions reporting positive outcomes were identified and were grouped into seven categories. Respiratory 7/34 (20%) and Nutrition 8/34 (23%) outcomes were the most reported categories. Developmental care was the next most reported category 5/34 (15%) followed by Thermoregulation, 5/34 (15%) Jaundice 4/34 (12%), Pain 4/34 (12%) and Infection 1/34 (3%).
This review has identified nursing interventions that have a direct positive impact on neonatal outcomes. However, further applied research is needed to transfer this empirical knowledge into clinical practice.
Implementing up-to-date evidence on effective nursing interventions has the potential to significantly improving neonatal outcomes.
No patient or public involvement in this scoping review.