To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in identifying small and large bowel obstruction and associated complications, including ischaemia and perforation, in adult patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy reporting guidelines.

Ovid MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 1946 to 20 February 2025.

The study included randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case–control studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT for bowel obstruction in adults (aged ≥18 years). Only studies published in English were included. Conversely, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts without full data and studies focusing exclusively on paediatric populations or animal models were excluded.

Three reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, CT modality, diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Tau² statistics.

Sixty-five studies with 9418 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT for bowel obstruction were 90% (95% CI 78 to 96; I²=56%, Tau²=0.36) and 88.8% (95% CI 78.0 to 94.8; I²=65%, Tau²=0.35), respectively. For bowel ischaemia, CT showed a pooled sensitivity of 47.0% (95% CI 32.4 to 59.9; I²=0%, Tau²=0.00) and specificity of 85.3% (95% CI 77.9 to 89.5; I²=1%, Tau²=0.45). Multidetector CT (MDCT) outperformed older modalities across all endpoints. Ischaemia was present in 22.05% of all cases, with higher rates in small bowel obstruction. Perforation and mortality rates were 3.98% and 4.40%, respectively. No significant publication bias was detected, and the certainty of evidence was graded as moderate for most diagnostic accuracy outcomes.

CT, particularly MDCT, offers high diagnostic accuracy for bowel obstruction and is a critical tool for detecting serious complications such as ischaemia and perforation. However, sensitivity for ischaemia remains modest. Standardised protocols and prospective studies are needed to enhance early identification and optimise care pathways.

Children with limited access to dental care can be negatively impacted by reduced frequency of oral health monitoring, delays in diagnosis of dental disease and increased waits for dental care, resulting in them experiencing more disease (extent and amount). Smartphone-based intraoral photography has been cited as having the potential to improve oral health monitoring for children through screening; however, it has not been well evaluated, and its limitations are unclear. The picture-perfect study aims to assess diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and acceptability to determine whether remote photographic monitoring can be effectively integrated into pathways of dental care for children aged 6-16 years.

Observational, cross-sectional, mixed-methods study with three workflows: Workflow 1: development of user-friendly, comprehensive guidance to help parent/carers (parents) take high-quality intraoral photographs of their children’s mouths. The guidance will be codesigned with parents and healthcare professionals. Workflow 2: diagnostic accuracy using intraoral photographs taken by a parent of their children will be evaluated by comparing clinicians' diagnoses from the photographs to gold-standard clinical visual-tactile examinations. Parent–child dyads (n=110) will be recruited to capture intraoral photographs using positioning aids, guidance and smartphones provided by the research team. The diagnoses will focus on plaque accumulation, gingival health, restoration status and dental caries. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the curve. Workflow 3: assessment of feasibility and acceptability will be through task completion rates, photograph quality and participant feedback. Qualitative interviews and an online survey will capture parents’ and children’s experiences. Observational data will provide insights into practical challenges.

This study, approved by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee (Integrated Research Application System [IRAS]: 24/EE0137), will be conducted in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participating parents, with age-appropriate assent from children prior to enrolment. Participants have the right to withdraw at any time without explanation, and their data will be anonymised to ensure privacy and confidentiality. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and reports to relevant stakeholders.

The study protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WX29D.