To understand the issues impacting atrial fibrillation (AF) screening and what needs to be considered for a successful national screening programme in Australia.

Qualitative design using semistructured interviews and thematic analysis.

Australian Health.

Six broad stakeholder groups were identified: charities/patient support, healthcare providers, professional bodies, government, research (including Indigenous health) and industry.

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 25 representative participants. Iterative thematic analysis was used. Coding was driven by the research questions (the current context; is a national screening programme warranted and approaches to a national screening programme) and an inductive approach where novel groupings of information were identified.

The key findings are grouped into four areas. (1) Current opportunistic general practitioner-led screening is ad hoc and fragmented. Issues: poor remuneration; lack of health sector collaboration and prioritisation; consumers lack awareness. (2) Systematic screening of all in-scope patients not considered feasible and concerns over lack of evidence. (3) Alternative approaches to increase screening include innovative approaches inside and outside general practice and use of smart technology. (4) Recommendations: (a) Support general practices and address remuneration and workflows; (b) Ensure a clear pathway to treatment; (c) Address data security, management and integration and sensitivity issues with wearable devices; (d) Promote collaboration between key organisations; (e) Address research gaps and (f) Generate culturally appropriate consumer education to promote consumer demand.

Most stakeholders were broadly supportive of AF screening but agreed that current approaches were fragmented and not sufficient. If the forthcoming research evidence supports screening effectiveness on major outcomes, stakeholders envisaged a semi-systematic approach tailored to specific health settings, rather than a formalised systematic national screening programme.

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterised by impaired homeostatic mechanisms and reduced physiological reserve. Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are commonly used as indicators of quality in primary healthcare. We aimed to examine the association between frailty and the use of healthcare resources, including unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs and visits to general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists (MSs) in primary care. We hypothesised that frail individuals would have similar odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs.

Registry-based epidemiological study.

Data from the Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study and national health registers. Data were collected in a rural region of Denmark between February 2016 and February 2020.

10 154 randomly selected individuals aged ≥50 years participating in the Lolland-Falster Health Study with valid frailty measurements.

Hospital visits due to any diagnosis, hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs, and visits to GPs and MSs in the primary care sector.

After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity and socioeconomic factors, frail participants had higher odds of hospital visits due to any diagnosis (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57; p=0.03). The odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.08; p=0.07) and non-ACSCs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.47; p=0.22) were not significantly different. Frail individuals had higher odds of visiting their GP (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; p=0.047) but not a medical specialist (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; p=0.15).

Among frail individuals, the distinction between unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs is not meaningful. This finding is consistent with the understanding of frailty as a state of reduced physiological reserve, in which minor stressors may lead to hospital care regardless of diagnostic category.

Infants born before 28 weeks’ gestation account for approximately 75% of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Late-onset sepsis (LOS) affects around 25% of these infants and is associated with an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes. The topical application of coconut oil has been used for centuries in newborn care. Coconut oil is rich in saturated fatty acids, several of which have demonstrated antimicrobial properties. It is considered safe for extremely preterm infants, improves skin condition and may reduce the incidence of LOS.

This is a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III clinical trial evaluating the effect of topical coconut oil versus routine skin care on the incidence of LOS in extremely preterm infants. Participating neonatal units will be cluster-randomised, and all infants born at

Following ethical approval, patients will be recruited at participating sites under a waiver of consent with opt-out framework. The trial results will be disseminated through conferences, media sources and publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals.

ACTRN12620001332910.

Despite the benefits of early diagnosis, most cancers in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to late presentation of symptoms, inadequate referral systems and poor diagnostic capacity. Health communication interventions have been used extensively in high-income countries to increase people’s awareness of cancer symptoms and encourage timely help-seeking. However, in SSA, there is still limited evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions and existing evaluations are mainly focused on communicable diseases rather than cancer.

A randomised, multisite, controlled community trial will evaluate a culturally tailored health infographic toolkit delivered in rural and urban settings in the Western Cape Province in South Africa and Harare and surrounding provinces in Zimbabwe. Participants will be randomised to receive one of three African aWAreness of CANcer and Early Diagnosis (AWACAN-ED) cancer awareness tools, coproduced with local communities, comprising health communication infographics with descriptions of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer symptoms plus messages to encourage consultation with primary care providers if symptoms occur, all presented in English and four local languages. We will recruit 144 participants in each of the three intervention groups (N=432). The primary outcome will be recall of symptoms and the secondary outcomes will be (1) intention to seek help, (2) emotional impact and (3) acceptability of the toolkit. Outcomes will be measured preintervention and at two points postintervention: after 15 min and 1 month.

Ethical approval was obtained in both participating countries, South Africa (148/2025) and Zimbabwe (363/2021). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent prior to participation. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and the AWACAN-ED programme website.

PACTR202505475803308.

To elicit the benefits of shared decision-making to doctors who are champions of this approach.

A qualitative interview study that used practical thematic analysis.

We identified a purposive international sample of doctors in active clinical practice who were recognised champions of shared decision-making, working in various clinical disciplines.

24 doctors in active clinical practice were interviewed; 14 were male and 10 were female; 20 had been in clinical practice for over 10 years (range 1–30). 12 practised in North America, 10 in Europe, 1 in South America and 1 in Asia; 4 doctors worked in internal medicine, 4 in primary care, 5 in surgery, 3 in paediatrics, 3 in oncology and 1 in each of the following disciplines: emergency medicine, palliative care, geriatrics, physical medicine and rehabilitation, anaesthesiology, and cardiology.

This selected sample of doctors consistently reported that shared decision-making provided benefits to themselves, their patients and their teams. Shared decision-making reinforced and enhanced their self-identity as ethical professionals, supporting patient autonomy, increasing their professional fulfilment and reducing their risk of burnout. These intrinsic benefits accompanied reports of other consequential benefits, namely, patients’ achieving better-informed, preference-sensitive decisions, a higher likelihood of improved patient outcomes, improved efficiency and team function. The doctors viewed the approach as providing connectedness, shared responsibility resulting in a lighter burden, acting as a buttress against moral injury and the emotional strain of clinical work and, where relevant, mitigation against becoming the second victim of a bad or unexpected outcome.

Doctors who champion shared decision-making report significant benefits to themselves and their patients. These benefits have not been widely reported, which has implications for motivating doctors to adopt shared decision-making. Instead of addressing presumed gaps in communication skills, it might be better to highlight the positive impact on professional fulfilment and the protective effect of shared decision-making.

We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial (the PHaCT study), including a process evaluation to assess the acceptability of a housing-led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) for prison leavers and the use of a trial design. This paper presents the process evaluation findings.

To explore the acceptability of both the intervention and the trial design to participants and those delivering the intervention, and to assess whether the intervention was delivered with fidelity.

A process evaluation following Medical Research Council guidelines. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with participants and CTI caseworkers and observations of intervention delivery. A thematic analysis of interviews and observations was conducted to understand the intervention’s implementation and contextual factors as well as the trial process acceptability.

Participants for the pilot trial were recruited from three prisons in England and Wales where the intervention was being delivered.

While 28 out of 34 trial participants consented to interviews, only one was completed. Seven caseworkers were interviewed.

A housing-led CTI to support people leaving prison at risk of homelessness, involving phased, time-limited support from caseworkers, starting prerelease and continuing postrelease, to help secure stable housing and build independence, without directly providing housing.

The intervention’s acceptability was primarily reflected through the positive feedback and success stories shared by CTI caseworkers, as well as observational data indicating high acceptance among service users. The trial design’s acceptability was challenged by concerns about randomisation and equipoise, with staff viewing randomisation as unethical due to limited support for vulnerable populations. The fidelity to the CTI intervention housing-led approach was adhered to as best as possible; stable housing was prioritised for service users before addressing other needs. Despite these efforts, both sites encountered significant challenges due to limited housing availability and complex systems for securing social housing, particularly for single men leaving prison.

This wider study faced significant challenges which impacted the process evaluation. Despite these issues, the evaluation provides important insights into the challenges of conducting trials on interventions for people leaving prison. The challenges experienced should inform future study designs with similar populations and in similar settings.

ISRCTN46969988.

To determine whether a full-scale randomised control trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a housing led Critical Time Intervention (CTI) is feasible and acceptable.

Pilot parallel two-arm individual level RCT, including process evaluation and embedded exploratory health economic evaluation.

Four prisons for men across England and Wales, UK.

Men leaving prison at risk of homelessness and intervention delivery staff.

CTI has four components: (1) pre-engagement phase: assessing the needs of the client and implementing a plan pre-discharge; (2) transition to community: forming relationships and goal setting; (3) try out: encouraging problem-solving and managing practical issues and (4) transfer of care: developing long-term goals and transferring responsibilities to community providers.

Progression criteria: recruitment, retention, acceptability of the processes (CTI and trial method) and fidelity of intervention delivery. We also assessed the completeness of primary, secondary and exploratory outcome measures and estimated intervention costs.

The recruitment progression criterion was met, with 92% (34/37) of approached individuals consenting to participate (target: 50%). However, the overall recruitment target of 80 was not achieved, and retention was low, only 18% (6/34) provided follow-up data, well below the 60% threshold. Retention was hindered by systemic challenges, including changes to prison release policies and reduced probation support. While the CTI model was acceptable to staff and service users, the trial design, particularly randomisation, was not. Intervention fidelity met the progression criteria. Baseline data collection for health economics and resource use was feasible, and intervention costs were estimated.

This pilot trial identified significant challenges to conducting a full-scale RCT of CTI in this context, particularly around retention, trial acceptability and systemic instability. While CTI remains a promising model, a traditional RCT design may not be viable in this setting without substantial structural and ethical adaptations.

ISRCTN46969988.

To explore cardiac rehabilitation (CR) professionals’ perspectives on kinesiophobia in patients with cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding their perceptions, assessments and management of kinesiophobia.

A qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.

The study was carried out through online interviews at a university teaching hospital in South India.

HCPs involved in CR, from around the world, were invited to participate through advertisements on social media and through professional forums. 12 HCPs, including CR nurses (n=1), CR physicians (n=1), cardiac surgeons (n=1), cardiac electrophysiologists (n=1), rehabilitation physicians (n=1), cardiologists (n=2), exercise physiologists (n=2) and physiotherapists (n=3), agreed to participate.

Not applicable (qualitative study without interventions).

Qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews focused on HCP perceptions regarding kinesiophobia and its assessment, management and awareness within CR.

Thematic analysis generated 337 codes, which formed seven subthemes: the perceived burden of kinesiophobia, reasons for kinesiophobia, HCP experiences with kinesiophobia, methods of assessing kinesiophobia, management strategies, reasons why kinesiophobia is overlooked and the importance of promoting awareness of kinesiophobia.

CR professionals recognise kinesiophobia as a significant issue among patients with heart disease but do not recognise the term or perceive it as a separate condition; instead, they view it as part of the overall clinical presentation. There is a strong need to advocate for early recognition and assessment of kinesiophobia and for the development of structured management strategies and its inclusion into CR programmes to improve patient outcomes during recovery.

The study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/05/042502). This study received approval from the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee-2 (Student Research) with reference number IEC2:13/2022.

Metacognitive strategy training is a crucial approach for addressing metacognitive deficits and enhancing metacognitive abilities, which can help mitigate age-related cognitive decline and optimise cognitive functioning. The present scoping review aims to systematically examine and synthesise the existing evidence on metacognitive strategy training programmes designed for both neurotypical adults and individuals with cognitive-communication disorders (CCDs).

A scoping review following the JBI methodology.

A literature search was conducted systematically across PubMed, Embase and Web of Science between June and August 2024.

Studies involving metacognitive strategy training for neurotypical adults or individuals with CCDs, measuring cognition, communication or metacognitive skills.

Two reviewers independently screened studies in a two-step process, that is, title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. Data extraction included study characteristics, participant demographics, intervention details and outcome measures.

A total of 32 studies met the selection criteria, revealing diverse metacognitive training approaches that varied in component and dosage. The most frequently used approaches are the Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance approach and the Multicontext approach. The reported outcome measures included cognitive outcomes, metacognitive outcomes, well-being measures and feasibility measures. The majority of interventions targeted occupational goals, followed by cognitive skills, with fewer studies addressing cognitive-communicative skills. Studies have focused primarily on individuals with CCDs, with only a few targeting neurotypical adults.

Studies examining the efficacy of metacognitive strategy training are heterogeneous in terms of population, intervention approaches, and outcome measures. There is significant potential to expand the focus of these interventions to include neurotypical adults, aiming to counteract age-related cognitive-communicative disorders. The limited research within the field of speech-language pathology presents a valuable opportunity for speech-language pathologists to broaden the application of metacognitive strategy training, particularly in enhancing cognitive-communicative abilities.

To assess and compare the patterns of smoked and smokeless tobacco use in India and to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with tobacco use through secondary data analysis of National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) (2015–2016) and (NFHS-5) (2019–2021) datasets.

A comparative weighted sample secondary data analysis was conducted using individual sampling weights in SPSS V.29.0, encompassing all 29 states and 7 union territories of India.

A total of 8 11 808 individuals from NFHS-4 (699 686 women aged 15–49 years and 1 12 122 men aged 15–54 years) and 825 954 individuals from NFHS-5 (724 115 women aged 15–49 years and 101 839 men aged 15–54 years), were included in the analysis.

Changes in smoked and smokeless tobacco use between the two survey rounds, stratified by age, gender, residency, socioeconomic status, and education.

Prevalence estimates were summarised as percentages with 95% CIs. Differences between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 were assessed using the Z test for proportions, with significance at p

Bidi and cigarette use declined modestly among men, while gutkha/paan masala use showed the sharpest reduction among women. The overall prevalence of tobacco use declined from 45.5% to 40.8% among men (–4.7 points) and from 6.8% to 4.0% among women (–2.8 points). Bidi use showed the steepest reduction in the study. Among men, it was (14.9%–14.2%), while cigarette use declined modestly (13.7%–13.3%). Rare smoked forms such as pipe, hookah and cigar remained uncommon. Among women, the prevalence of smoked tobacco was negligible, whereas smokeless forms were more frequent but that too showed decline, with the largest reduction observed in gutkha/paan masala (2.2%–1.4%).

Tobacco use in India declined modestly between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5, with greater reductions in smoked than in smokeless forms. Nonetheless, smokeless tobacco remains more prevalent among women, and significant disparities persist across gender, rural–urban residence and socioeconomic strata.