Conectar
Infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions are multifactorial and are used to prevent healthcare-associated infections in healthcare facilities. However, patient views and enabling patient and public involvement (PPI) in their development has been minimal.
This systematic review aims to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting patient satisfaction outcomes in the context of IPC interventions, to document the methods used to assess patient satisfaction and to conduct a meta-analysis on reported satisfaction outcomes.
Systematic review and meta-analysis following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA statement, with oversight from a steering group including PPI partners. Studies in peer-reviewed journals were included based on eligibility criteria.
MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched in June 2024.
Included studies investigated satisfaction among hospitalised patients in acute care settings following IPC measures, including isolation, cohorting, screening, hand hygiene, antimicrobial stewardship, patient flagging, education, personal protective equipment use, visiting restrictions and treatment delays
Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by a third. Study quality was assessed using the JBI manual for evidence synthesis. A meta-analysis was conducted where four or more studies used comparable designs and methods within the same areas of IPC, with heterogeneity evaluated using Cochran’s Q statistic and I2 and pooled estimates calculated with 95% CIs using the Wilson (score) method.
Twenty-nine studies were identified. Among IPC measures, isolation precautions were the most commonly reported intervention (11 studies, 38%). The Likert scale was the predominant assessment method (13 studies, 45%). Patient satisfaction with IPC interventions ranged from 58.3% to 97.2%. Meta-analysis of four studies using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey showed substantial heterogeneity (I2, 55%, p=0.08) and a pooled patient satisfaction level of 69% (95% CI 63.6% to 74.4%) for isolation precautions.
Sixty-nine percent of isolated patients reported satisfaction with their care. Patient satisfaction with IPC interventions varies widely, highlighting limitations in current measurement approaches. Strengthening PPI in the design and evaluation of satisfaction measures is essential to capture meaningful data and improvements in IPC programmes.
IS 2024 CRD42024558385.
This work aimed to explore barriers to pessary self-management and co-create strategies to address these.
Participatory Action Research.
In October 2024, eight pessary-using women living in the United Kingdom participated in cooperative inquiry, discussion and co-creation of strategies in two virtual workshops.
Pessary using women who participated in this research identified challenges affecting willingness to self-manage a pessary and proposed solutions to address these and better support women. Pessary practitioners should assess physical capabilities, consider softer, more malleable pessaries, and explore the possibility of a pessary applicator. Peer support was seen as empowering, enabling self-advocacy and improved care; therefore, establishing peer networks was prioritised. Major barriers included difficulty navigating services and limited access to a full range of pessaries, leading some women to buy devices online without medical oversight, creating a two-tier system based on ability to pay. The group called for improved, standardised pessary care, and for self-management to be reframed to avoid women feeling ‘fobbed off’ through better follow-up, positive language, and compassionate care.
The group identified strategies to address barriers to pessary self-management which require further exploration. Pessary practitioners have a responsibility to listen to these voices and take steps to improve care for women in the future.
To support women's willingness to self-manage their pessary, pessary practitioners should consider and support women to overcome physical and emotional barriers; improve information provision; maximise social support; boost women's perceived self-efficacy; reframe pessary self-management and ensure robust, accessible follow-up is in place. This will ensure pessary-using women are supported to make an informed decision about pessary self-management. This research offers pessary practitioners insight into barriers women perceive to pessary self-management and guidance as to how women can be supported to self-manage their pessary.
Only 21% of women are willing to self-manage their pessary. Therefore, this research aimed to co-create strategies to better support women to self-manage their pessary and overcome barriers to willingness. Women reported individual, societal and service factors which affect willingness to self-manage a pessary. These research findings should be translated into clinical practice and care delivery for pessary using women in both a community and hospital setting.
COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist.
Patients and members of the public were involved in research prioritization, study design, data analysis, interpretation of findings and dissemination.
Study not registered.
A spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts synaptic connections between the corticospinal tract and motor neurons, impairing muscle control below the injury site. Many individuals with an SCI have impaired trunk control, affecting the performance of activities of daily living and quality of life. Work has shown improvements in trunk control after home-based, unsupervised arm-crank exercise training (ACET) in people with chronic motor-incomplete SCI. However, no studies have examined ACET’s impact on trunk control in individuals with subacute SCI. This study aims to investigate ACET’s effects on trunk control in adults with subacute incomplete SCI, and its mechanisms, and its long-term benefits on neuropathic pain, psychological well-being, physical activity levels and health-related quality of life.
This multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will evaluate self-directed ACET in 60 individuals with subacute SCI (
This study was approved by The Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (22/NS/0054). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Findings will be presented at National and International conferences for researchers and clinicians. Finally, results will be disseminated to the SCI community.
We calculate positive predictive values (PPVs) of patients presenting with unexpected weight loss (UWL) being diagnosed with cancer within 6 months, using data from a population of Australian primary care patients to replicate results from a previous UK study.
A diagnostic accuracy study involving calculation of the PPV for any cancer using retrospective data from routinely collected electronic healthcare records. The index date is defined as the first recorded UWL presentation and the reference standard is cancer diagnosis within 6 months of the index date.
This study uses primary care data from the Patron primary care database, linked to hospital admissions data and the Victorian Cancer Registry. We include only patients who presented to their General Practitioners (GPs) at least once between 1 July 2007 and 1 February 2022.
Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age at the index date, had no previous diagnosis of cancer or previous weight loss intervention, including being prescribed medications for weight loss. 13 306 patients out of a primary care population of 1 791 051 patients were identified that met the eligibility criteria.
When stratified by age, sex and smoking status, we found PPVs lower than those derived in a previous UK primary care study, though still above 3% for male non-smokers over 60, female smokers over 70 and all males over 70. Patients from ages 60–79 with at least one abnormal blood test result had PPVs consistently above 3%, while overall, patients with abnormal blood test results have PPVs of up to 35%.
We confirmed that many PPVs, while consistently below those derived in the UK study, are above clinically significant thresholds and increasing with age and the number of different abnormal blood test results.
FreshRSS 