FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of integrated cognitive-behavioural therapy (COPE-A) for substance use and traumatic stress among adolescents and young adults delivered via telehealth versus in person: trial protocol

Por: Mills · K. · Winter · V. · Cobham · V. · Peach · N. · Arunogiri · S. · Chatterton · M. L. · Bendall · S. · Back · S. E. · Perrin · S. · Brady · K. · COPE-A Trial Team · Barrett · Teesson · Slade · Hamilton · Rickwood · Reid · Leicester · Milne · Curtis · Harvey · Kay-Lambkin
Introduction

Emerging research indicates that integrated treatment of co-occurring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder can be effective among adolescents and young people. However, various barriers exist to young people accessing evidence-based treatments. Telehealth offers an opportunity to address these barriers and provide a scalable and accessible alternative to inperson treatment. This paper describes the study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of an integrated trauma-focused cognitive-behavioural treatment for traumatic stress and substance use among adolescents and young adults (Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders Using Prolonged Exposure – Adolescent and Young Adult version (COPE-A)) when delivered in person compared with via telehealth.

Methods and analysis

A two-arm, parallel group, single-blind, non-inferiority RCT with follow-up at 4 months and 12 months post study entry will be conducted in Sydney, Australia. Participants (170 adolescents and young adults aged 12–25 years) will be allocated to receive COPE-A either in person or via telehealth (allocation ratio 1:1) using minimisation. Project psychologists will administer treatment via both modes of delivery over a maximum of 16 sessions of 60–90 min. The primary outcome will be between-group differences in change in the severity of PTSD symptoms from baseline to 4-month follow-up, as measured by the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/ETH01050). Research findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

ACTRN12624000776505.

Protocol version

V.2.3, 20 March 2025.

Consensus process to agree upon surgical quality assurance processes within a pragmatic, multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing targeted axillary dissection and axillary node clearance: the TADPOLE-TOGETHER project

Por: Potter · S. · Mullan · R. · Cain · H. · John · E. S. · Barry · P. · Masannat · Y. · Harvey · J. R. · Fairhurst · K. · Morgan · A. · Perkins · M. · Mann · G. B. · Lippey · J. · Blencowe · N. S. · McIntosh · S. A. · on behalf of the TADPOLE Trial Management Group · The TADPOLE Trial M
Introduction

Patients with node-positive breast cancer having primary surgery currently undergo axillary node clearance (ANC) to reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Evidence that this highly morbid procedure improves survival is lacking, but approximately 30% of patients will develop lifelong complications which significantly impact their quality of life.

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) may be a safe, less morbid alternative to ANC and will be evaluated in the upcoming Targeted Axillary Dissection versus axillary node clearance in patients with POsitive axillary Lymph nodes in Early breast cancer (TADPOLE) randomised controlled trial.

TAD is not currently routine practice in patients having primary surgery, so it is vital that the procedure is performed in an agreed upon, standardised way within the trial and procedure fidelity monitored to ensure the results are generalisable and will be accepted by the surgical community. Robust surgical quality assurance (SQA) is essential. Here we describe the first phase of the TADPOLE SQA, a consensus process with the breast surgical community to agree upon how (1) surgery should be performed and standardised; (2) procedure fidelity will be monitored and (3) requirements for surgeon credentialling within the trial.

Methods and analysis

The consensus process will have three phases:

  • Generation of a long list of possible components of TAD from a scoping review and expert opinion. Identified items will be categorised and formatted into Delphi consensus questionnaire items.

  • At least two rounds of an online Delphi survey in which at least 100 breast cancer surgeons will rate the importance of mandating/prohibiting, standardising and/or monitoring each component.

  • A consensus meeting with surgeons to discuss, agree upon and ratify the approach to SQA within TADPOLE.

  • Ethics and dissemination

    Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Bristol Faculty of Health Sciences Ethics Committee. Educational materials including videos and webinars will be developed and shared with surgeons participating in TADPOLE. Results will be presented at national/international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

    Psilocybin-Assisted suppoRtive psychoTherapy IN the treatment of prolonged Grief (PARTING) trial: protocol for an open-label pilot trial for cancer-related bereavement

    Por: Beesley · V. L. · Kennedy · T. J. · Maccallum · F. · Ross · M. · Harvey · R. · Rossell · S. L. · Sarris · J. · Perkins · D. · Neale · R. E. · Bennett-Levy · J. · Johnson · S. · Beebe · H. · Roset · N. · Strobel · J. · Parker · S.
    Introduction

    Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) represents a substantial public health issue, especially in oncology settings where it affects up to 30% of bereaved carers. Current best-practice treatments are lengthy, and up to 50% of participants have persistent PGD. Building on encouraging recent research with psychedelic-assisted therapies, the Psilocybin-Assisted suppoRtive psychoTherapy IN the treatment of prolonged Grief (PARTING) trial is the first study to consider psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy as a potential treatment for prolonged grief.

    Methods and analysis

    PARTING is an open-label pilot trial of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for approximately 15 people with cancer-related PGD. It aims to investigate feasibility, safety, acceptability, participant experience and participant-reported therapeutic effects. Over a 5-week intervention period, participants will undergo three preparation sessions before receiving a psychoactive (25 mg) dose of psilocybin alongside non-directive supportive guidance, followed by four integration sessions. All sessions will be delivered by a psychologist and either a nurse or Indigenous Therapist. An artificial intelligence-assisted tool will be used to create an artwork of participants’ psychedelic experience.

    Outcomes will be investigated over a 12-month follow-up period. Feasibility will be assessed through recruitment/retention rates and completion of follow-up assessments. Safety will be evaluated via adverse events over 12 months and the comparison of physiological measures (vital signs, biochemistry, haematology, ECG) recorded during screening and 1 day after the psilocybin dose. Qualitative thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with participants and trial therapists will assess acceptability and the therapeutic potential of the treatment. Diagnostic clinical interviews for PGD and quantitative participant-reported measures of therapeutic effects are also being collected. Participant-reported measures include grief severity, depression, anxiety, grief avoidance, psychological flexibility, connectedness, and quality of life.

    Ethics and dissemination

    Ethics approval has been obtained from QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Human Research Ethics Committee (P3801). Dissemination of results will occur via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and media.

    Trial registration number

    Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000827639).

    ❌