Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries.

Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed.

Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

CRD42022315407.

The study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a non-immersive virtual reality (VR) system on upper extremity (UE) recovery in ischaemic stroke patients in comparison to a conventional physiotherapy.

An open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial randomly assigned the participants to two groups, VR intervention or conventional physiotherapy.

Two tertiary stroke care centres in South India participated in the study.

Sixty first-ever ischaemic stroke patients (1–6 months of stroke onset) having spasticity grades of 1 or 1+ as per Modified Ashworth scale and Brunnstrom recovery stages of 3, 4 or 5 in the UE were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

High-intensity non-immersive VR-based comprehensive rehabilitation gaming system with a duration of 12 weeks (3 days/week) was compared with equally intensive conventional physiotherapy.

The feasibility outcome was the compliance with the treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in the motor function assessed by the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and Wolf motor function test (WMFT). The secondary outcomes included the performance in activities of daily living by the Barthel index (BI) and the quality of life by the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36).

The treatment compliance was similar in two groups (p=0.19). Both groups improved in motor performance, activities of daily living and quality of life. However, there were no significant differences in the FMA (p=0.58), WMFT (functional ability scale, p=0.33; performance time, p=0.44), BI (p=0.84) and SF-36 (physical, p=0.87; mental, p=0.99) scores between the groups.

The non-immersive VR system was feasible, effective and safe; however, it was not found to be superior to conventional physiotherapy. The trial was stopped early and did not reach its proposed sample size and hence, the findings are to be interpreted cautiously.

Clinical trial registry India: CTRI/2021/11/038339 (https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NTc1OTI=&Enc=&userName=CTRI/2021/11/038339).

Declined donor organs and explanted recipient organs may hold considerable value for biomedical research, particularly in advancing knowledge of disease mechanisms and supporting drug development. However, public perceptions of such use, and preferences for how consent should be obtained, remain underexplored.

Four workshops were held across the UK to examine the views of organ donor families and transplant recipients regarding the use of human organs in research, with a focus on myocardial regeneration. Each workshop included three brief presentations on transplantation and cardiac regeneration, followed by facilitated small-group discussions. Observational notes were taken to capture participants’ perspectives on the use of organs unsuitable for transplantation. A follow-up survey generated both quantitative and qualitative data, the latter analysed using thematic analysis.

Participants expressed strong support for the use of declined donor and explanted recipient organs in research. Transplant recipients frequently cited a desire to give back to the National Health Service (NHS), while donor families viewed research use as a meaningful way to honour their loved ones when transplantation was not possible.

This exploratory study highlights widespread support for using non-transplantable organs in research among individuals with personal experience of transplantation. The findings suggest a need for further research into how best to support and inform potential donors and families. Participants emphasised the importance of sensitive communication, clear consent processes and transparency regarding the use of donated organs.

The global population of older adults has grown at an unprecedented rate, and projections indicate that the number of older adults will continue to increase considerably in the coming decades. The clinical complexity of older adults living in retirement homes, also known as assisted living settings, is also increasing, and the regulations to ensure quality and safety standards in retirement homes are highly variable. The purpose of this scoping review is to map and summarise the methods used to monitor and measure the safety of older adults living in retirement homes, providing an overview of existing approaches and areas requiring further investigation.

This scoping review will follow the five stages of the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review process. We will report this review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science Core Collection) will be performed, and reference lists of included articles will be searched. We will conduct a two-step screening process, data extraction and analysis of the included studies. We will include all primary study designs that report on safety measurement and monitoring of any type of harms. Relevant grey literature will also be identified. We will exclude studies that only report results from facilities providing 24-hour skilled nursing care or specialised care services, and those not published in English or French. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/8rheq).

No ethical approval is needed for the review, and we plan to present the results at research conferences and in a peer-reviewed article. Our findings may inform future research studies that seek to support and improve safety practices in retirement homes.

Older inpatients face a higher risk of delirium, falls and functional decline during hospital stays. Volunteer programmes have been shown to improve patient outcomes in single settings, but little is known about their implementation and spread across multiple care environments. This study describes the implementation and system-wide spread of Maximizing Ageing Using Volunteer Engagement (MAUVE)—a volunteer-based programme supporting older patients’ cognitive, physical and social well-being—and evaluates its impact on healthcare staff satisfaction.

A prospective observational service evaluation.

Emergency department, seven acute in-patient care units and two transitional care units within a Canadian hospital system from January to December 2019.

Older patients receiving care, volunteers delivering interventions and front-line nursing staff.

Trained volunteers delivered up to six types of interventions targeting patients’ cognitive stimulation, physical activity, social engagement, functional support, orientation and companionship.

Staff satisfaction with the MAUVE programme was measured using a structured survey administered 6 months after programme implementation. Data on patients and volunteers—including the number and type of interventions delivered, volunteer hours and patient reach—were also collected to assess feasibility and programme uptake.

Over 12 months, 94 volunteers delivered 31 593 interventions to 3568 unique patients across three care settings. Front-line staff reported high satisfaction with the MAUVE programme, noting that volunteers enhanced patient care and enabled more direct patient interaction by staff.

The MAUVE programme is the first known volunteer-led patient engagement programme to be successfully implemented across acute, emergency and transitional care settings. This service evaluation demonstrates that structured volunteer engagement can support older patients’ well-being while enhancing staff satisfaction and enabling front-line care providers to deliver more direct care.

Detecting chronic kidney disease (CKD) early can provide opportunities to optimise native kidney function, prevent further decline and plan for timely kidney transplantation if required. Understanding how children are found to have kidney disease and present to specialist kidney care may help tailor interventions to support a timelier diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine the pathway to specialist care for UK children who present late to nephrology with advanced CKD (requiring kidney replacement therapy within 90 days of first nephrology review) to determine whether there are modifiable aspects to presentation and diagnosis.

Semi-structured, in-depth qualitative study. A topic guide based on the theoretical framework of health behaviour by Scott et al, The Model of Pathways to Treatment, was developed to capture differences in symptom appraisal and help-seeking before reaching nephrology care.

UK paediatric nephrology units (n=4) between December 2017 and December 2020.

Children and young people who experienced a late presentation of CKD and their parents/carers.

Twenty-two participants participated across 19 interviews: seven children (two male, median age 16, IQR 13–17.5 years) and 15 parents. A typology of presentation to healthcare was identified: commonly, families reported repeated cycles of primary care help-seeking before onward referral to specialist care, although long appraisal intervals were also noted. In all cases, secondary care referral led to onward nephrology care involvement. Narratives highlighted that not all cases of late presentation could be avoided.

A typology of symptom appraisal and help-seeking can inform interventions to improve CKD detection. Interventions that support symptom appraisal and consideration of targeted CKD testing in children may help reduce appraisal and help-seeking intervals, respectively.