Postoperative arrhythmias are common and clinically significant complications. They are a cause of increased morbidity and mortality rates in surgical patients. Although various pharmacological and procedural strategies have been explored for preventing postoperative arrhythmia, evidence regarding their effectiveness remains inconsistent. The stellate ganglion block (SGB) has emerged as a promising alternative to reduce the occurrence of postoperative arrhythmias. By summarising the existing evidence, this meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness of SGB in preventing postoperative arrhythmias.

We will review literature from January 1970 to April 2025 using MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Embase. Studies eligible for inclusion will be randomised controlled trials and observational studies reporting postoperative arrhythmia incidence in surgical patients who received preoperative or intraoperative SGB. We will include articles in the following languages: English, Spanish, Chinese or Portuguese. Secondary outcomes are SGB-related complications. The risk of bias will be determined by Rob-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analyses, reporting relative risks or ORs with 95% confidence intervals will be performed when at least three studies report the same outcome under comparable conditions. Quality of evidence will be evaluated using GRADE guidelines.

We will use information from previously published manuscripts found in reputable databases, and ethical approval is not necessary.

CRD420251029643.

Despite a high disease burden, care-seeking for mental health symptoms is low in Bangladesh, particularly among women.

To evaluate help-seeking behaviours for anxiety and depression symptoms among Bangladeshi women aged 15–49 and its association with women’s empowerment.

Data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022 including 2881 women reporting anxiety or depression symptoms were analysed. Help-seeking behaviours, sociodemographics and women’s empowerment using the Survey-based Women’s Empowerment (SWPER) index were assessed. Logistic regression models were used to explore associations.

The mean age of participants was 33.3 years (SD 8.7); two-thirds lived in rural areas. In the SWPER index, 83% of women had high empowerment in the attitude to violence domain, 16% in social independence and 60% in decision-making. Among women with anxiety or depression symptoms, 18.7% sought help, mainly from spouses (43%) or family (52%), and 15% consulted doctors. Women aged >30 years (adjusted OR, aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.53), from rich households (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.89), and with secondary (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.01) or higher education (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.36) were more likely to seek help. High empowerment in attitude to violence (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.81) and decision-making (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.68) correlated negatively with help-seeking.

Few Bangladeshi women seek help for mental health symptoms, relying on informal sources. Age, education, wealth and employment predict help-seeking, while high empowerment level in attitude to violence and decision-making domain of SWPER index shows an inverse relationship.

We calculate positive predictive values (PPVs) of patients presenting with unexpected weight loss (UWL) being diagnosed with cancer within 6 months, using data from a population of Australian primary care patients to replicate results from a previous UK study.

A diagnostic accuracy study involving calculation of the PPV for any cancer using retrospective data from routinely collected electronic healthcare records. The index date is defined as the first recorded UWL presentation and the reference standard is cancer diagnosis within 6 months of the index date.

This study uses primary care data from the Patron primary care database, linked to hospital admissions data and the Victorian Cancer Registry. We include only patients who presented to their General Practitioners (GPs) at least once between 1 July 2007 and 1 February 2022.

Patients were included if they were at least 18 years of age at the index date, had no previous diagnosis of cancer or previous weight loss intervention, including being prescribed medications for weight loss. 13 306 patients out of a primary care population of 1 791 051 patients were identified that met the eligibility criteria.

When stratified by age, sex and smoking status, we found PPVs lower than those derived in a previous UK primary care study, though still above 3% for male non-smokers over 60, female smokers over 70 and all males over 70. Patients from ages 60–79 with at least one abnormal blood test result had PPVs consistently above 3%, while overall, patients with abnormal blood test results have PPVs of up to 35%.

We confirmed that many PPVs, while consistently below those derived in the UK study, are above clinically significant thresholds and increasing with age and the number of different abnormal blood test results.

Prediabetes (PD), defined by impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose, represents a growing global health challenge, with a prevalence projected to increase substantially. PD is a critical intervention target because of its high annual progression rate (5–10%) to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Non-surgical interventions (NSIs), particularly lifestyle modifications (LMs) and pharmacological therapies, are the cornerstone of PD management, demonstrating efficacy and cost efficiency over surgical options. However, despite LM’s ability to reduce T2DM incidence by 40–70% in trials such as the Diabetes Prevention Program, real-world implementation faces barriers, including resource intensity and complex delivery requirements, which increase upfront costs. We aim to review scientific literature reporting on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NSIs for preventing the progression of PD to T2DM among adults.

The lack of interoperability has been a well-recognised limitation associated with the use of electronic health records (EHR). However, less is known about how it manifests for frontline NHS staff when delivering care, how it impacts patient care and what its implications are on care efficiency.

(1) To capture the perceptions of NHS physicians regarding the current state of EHR interoperability, (2) to investigate how poor interoperability affects patient care and safety and (3) to explore the effects it has had on care efficiency in the NHS.

An online Qualtrics survey was conducted between June and October 2021 to explore how NHS physicians perceived the present state of interoperability among EHR in service, its effects on patient safety and its impact on care efficiency in NHS healthcare facilities. Recruitment was performed via convenience sampling and snowballing in collaboration with contacts at Health Education England deaneries and the Royal College of General Practitioners. Descriptive statistics were used to report any notable findings observed.

A total of 636 NHS physicians participated, of which 218 (34.3%) completed the survey fully. Participants reported that EHR interoperability is rudimentary across much of the NHS, with limited ability to read but not edit data from within their organisation. Negative perceptions were most pronounced among specialties in secondary care settings and those with less than 1 year of EHR experience or lower self-reported EHR skills. Limited interoperability prolonged hospital stays, lengthened consultation times and frequently necessitated repeat investigations to be performed. Limited EHR interoperability impaired physician access to clinical data, hampered communication between providers and was perceived to threaten patient safety.

As healthcare data continues to increase in complexity and volume, EHR interoperability must evolve to accommodate these growing changes and ensure the continued delivery of safe care. The experiences of physicians provide valuable insight into the practical challenges limited interoperability poses and can contribute to future policy solutions to better integrate EHR in the clinical environment.

This study explored the experience of stigma and access to healthcare by persons with long COVID from the majority Dutch and two ethnic minority populations (Turkish and Moroccan) living in the Netherlands.

This was a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed inductive and deductive thematic approaches to data analysis using MAXQDA.

Between October 2022 and January 2023, 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants of Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish ethnic origins with long COVID living in the Netherlands. Participants were men and women aged 30 years and above.

Guided by the concepts of stigma and candidacy, the findings are structured according to the broader themes of stigma and access to care. The findings show that people with long COVID suffer self and public stigma resulting from the debilitating illness and symptoms. Especially among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, strong filial obligations and gendered expectations of responsibility and support within their communities further worsen self-stigma. This experience of stigma persisted within healthcare where lack of information and appropriate care pathways led to feelings of frustration and abandonment, especially for participants with pre-existing health conditions which further complicate candidacy. Under the access to healthcare theme, the findings show multiple challenges in accessing healthcare for long COVID due to several multifaceted factors related to the various stages of candidacy which impacted access to care. Particularly for Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, additional challenges resulting from limited access to information, pre-existing structural challenges and experience of stereotyping based on ethnicity or assumed migrant identity by health professionals further complicate access to health information and long COVID care.

The findings call for urgent attention and research to identify and coordinate healthcare for long COVID. There is also a need for accessible, informative and tailored support systems to facilitate patients’ access to information and care pathways for long COVID. Providing tailored information and support, addressing the various barriers that hinder optimal operating conditions in healthcare and leveraging on social networks is crucial for addressing stigma and facilitating candidacy for persons with long COVID towards improving access to care.

During the pandemic, overweight and obese adolescents were at a higher risk of COVID-19 infection. Indonesia’s government has implemented prevention programmes and immunisation; however, the rise in SARS-CoV-2 infections among adolescents is exacerbated by low-quality diet and lifestyle habits. Also, the vaccine programme is not prioritised in this population. To address this, a solution involves providing probiotics and counselling on healthy lifestyle habits to improve diet and immunity. Therefore, we designed a protocol for a randomised controlled trial with a 20-week intervention to investigate the effect of probiotics supplementation and counselling on healthy lifestyle habits, including healthy eating and physical activity, and psychosocial stimulation, on nutritional status and antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 in this group.

This clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of probiotic supplementation on healthy overweight and obese adolescents. The study will involve 440 adolescents aged 12–17 living in Jakarta, Surabaya or Yogyakarta for at least 6 months and have completed at least two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The intervention group will receive daily probiotic supplementation of three strains, including Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis (BB-12), Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (LGG), at the level of 10⁹–10¹⁰ colony-forming units for 20 weeks, while the control group will receive a placebo. Both groups will receive weekly counselling on healthy eating habits, physical activity and psychosocial stimulation. The primary outcomes will be changes in the body mass index for age z-score and IgG specific to SARS-CoV-2 titre concentrations between groups. The secondary outcomes will include changes in secretory IgA specific to SARS-CoV-2 titre concentrations, monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, gut microbiota diversity and the score of Healthy Eating Index 2015.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia-Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (KET 763/UN2.F1/ETIK/PPM.00.02/2022: 1 August 2022). The study results will be disseminated in open-access international journals, scientific meetings and conferences with stakeholders.

The study has been registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov with identifier number NCT05623007.

Social Prescribing (SP) programmes hold significant promise, yet there is a critical need to identify the underlying causes of their challenges and develop evidence-based, co-designed solution ideas through a collaborative approach.

This study applied a multimethod participatory design using co-design workshops to generate solutions to root problems and a 2-day Citizen Jury (CJ) event to validate these solutions from different perspectives.

Four co-design workshops were conducted with different stakeholders, including experts-by-experience, community providers, SP link workers and other health and social care professionals who were responsible in SP coordination and leadership.

Data were analysed using thematic analysis, identifying the root causes across several domains: human resources issues, social determinants of health), intrasectoral and intersectoral collaboration in health planning and service delivery, knowledge and awareness, financing, assessment systems for evaluating SP programme effectiveness, information systems and supportive policies/mechanisms.

11 solutions were proposed, including prioritising a human-centric approach, establishing sustainable funding mechanisms, providing sufficient training and knowledge for staff, fostering co-production and shared vision across sectors, adopting a preventive approach to healthcare, enhancing information system support and encouraging self-referrals. These strategies were proposed and refined during the 2-day CJ event.

Using a participatory method enabled a comprehensive understanding of different stakeholders’ perspectives and facilitated the development of co-produced solutions based on the identified challenges. This approach has the potential to assist policymakers in developing realistic policies to enhance social care within integrated care systems.