Conectar
The aim of this study was to document the process of the implementation and the perceived impact and sustainability of the Expansive Learning in Practice Model and its associated costs to inform future rollout.
A mixed-method rapid evaluation was conducted, comprising both qualitative and economic workstreams to document the implementation of the Expansive Learning in Practice Model and its associated costs. Semi-structured interviews (n = 44) were carried out with student nurses, student assessors, and staff involved in the delivery of the Model. The qualitative workstream utilised a rapid cycle evaluation approach, where data were collected and analysed in parallel, and preliminary findings were shared with stakeholders as the study was ongoing. The quantitative workstream relied on routinely collected data about non-staff-related costs, staff-related costs, and data on students' participation.
The main themes developed from the qualitative data included the organisation of the Expansive Learning Experiences, the supportive environment, the enhanced learning experience, and capacity building. Participants perceived that the model had a positive impact on student practice (including preparation and confidence) and on student nurse satisfaction. At the end of the programme, it is estimated that the programme will have cost about £523,572.
This model can be used as a framework for hospitals aiming to improve the learning experiences for student nurses. Improvements could be made by increasing staff buy-in and the streamlining of spoke opportunities. Future studies should focus on evaluating the long-term impact of the model, particularly the impact on generating student placement capacity. The evaluation also highlights the need for solutions for potential educational staff shortages, which could pose a risk to maintaining sufficient practice placement capacity for student nurses in healthcare settings.
Study participants perceived an improvement in student nurses' learning experiences and student nurse placement capacity as a result of the implementation of this model.
The relevant EQUATOR guidelines followed for reporting were the GRAMM guidelines (Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study).
The study centred around student nurse and staff experiences.
The emergency department (ED) often serves as a crucial pathway for cancer diagnosis. However, little is known about the management of patients with new suspected cancer diagnoses in the ED. The objective of this study was to explore emergency physicians’ experiences in managing patients with a newly suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED.
Between January and April 2024, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study. Interviews were conducted by trained research personnel using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved. The interview transcripts were coded and thematic analysis was used to uncover key themes.
Emergency physicians practising in Ontario, Canada.
20 emergency physicians were interviewed. Four themes around the management of patients with new suspected cancer diagnoses in the ED were identified: (1) healthcare system-level factors that impact suspected cancer diagnosis through the ED, (2) institutional and provider-level challenges associated with managing patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED, (3) patient-level characteristics and experiences of receiving a cancer diagnosis in the ED and (4) the need for care coordination for patients with suspected cancer in the ED.
Physicians experienced several unique challenges in managing patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis in the ED. Overall, the findings of this study suggest these challenges often make the ED a difficult environment in which to deliver a suspected cancer diagnosis.
FreshRSS 