Conectar
To explore the barriers and facilitators in adherence to the guidelines in the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo from the perspective of primary care physicians.
Qualitative study using focus groups.
L’Hospitalet del Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain.
Qualitative study using focus groups. Structured 90 min focus groups were conducted until data saturation was reached. Each session included a moderator and an observer from the research team. Sessions were transcribed and thematically analysed by three independent researchers.
Purposeful sampling was used to form four groups of 4–10 participants, selected by sex, age, years of experience and primary care team (PCT). Participants were recruited between January and February 2023.
A total of 34 family physicians belonging to four PCTs participated in the study. The main barriers identified were a lack of time, negative initial experiences, a fear of harming patients (especially older adults), difficulty in nystagmus visualisation and challenges in managing patient expectations, as many preferred medication over physical manoeuvres. Facilitators included potential time savings from effective early management, the value of initial practical training with periodic refreshers, access to expert consultants for case discussions and the availability of digital tools, such as tutorials, videos and aids for nystagmus interpretation.
Health systems should invest in protected time for history-taking and physical examination, and in regular, updated training for primary care professionals. This could improve vertigo management and reduce unnecessary investigations and medications, ultimately benefiting both patients and the healthcare system.
by Andy Domínguez-Monterroza, Alfonso Mateos Caballero, Antonio Jiménez-Martín
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a well-established marker of autonomic regulation and undergoes profound maturation during early human development. In this study, topological data analysis (TDA) is applied to investigate the evolving geometric complexity of HRV across pediatric developmental stages. Using persistent homology in homological dimension 1, we extracted topological descriptors from time-delay embedded RR interval series of 127 individuals aged 1 month to 17 years. We identified statistically significant, age-dependent transformations in the topological structure of HRV signals. Neonates and infants exhibited a greater number and strength of persistent features, reflecting highly heterogeneous cardiac control dynamics during early autonomic maturation. In contrast, adolescents displayed reduced topological complexity and increased entropy, suggesting a shift toward more uniform and structured physiological control. Topological measures correlated with conventional HRV indices, confirming their physiological relevance. Furthermore, pairwise distances between persistence landscapes revealed an inverse relationship between intra-group topological variability and classical HRV measures. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that persistent homology provides a powerful, multiscale-aware framework to capture developmental trajectories in cardiac autonomic regulation, with potential applications in pediatric monitoring, developmental physiology, and early detection of dysautonomia.Phasix mesh is a fully resorbable synthetic mesh for use in clean and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repairs. Long-term absorbable Phasix mesh appears to be a safe and promising device in incisional hernia repair, with low recurrence rates; however, data on long-term complications after surgery, particularly after the resorption period of the mesh, are scarce.
This protocol describes a study of several European registries on the use of a Phasix mesh in incisional hernia repair. The primary endpoint of the study is long-term complications at 2–5 year follow-up after mesh implantation, with secondary endpoints including hernia recurrence and complications during short-term follow-up.
Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as the study is based on anonymised registry data collected with prior patient consent in each registry. Each participating registry has its own ethical approval process, and this study will adhere to those regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
by Jaime Carballedo-Pulido, Mariona Farrés-Tarafa, Juan Roldán-Merino, Marta Berenguer-Poblet, Montserrat Girabent-Farrés, Carla Otero-Arús, Susana Santos-Ruiz
BackgroundAlthough the SBAR framework is widely used in clinical and educational settings, there is a lack of validated Spanish-language tools that objectively assess its use by students in simulation. The adaptation and validation of the SBAR-LA rubric address this gap and provide a resource for training and evaluating structured communication.
ObjectiveTo conduct the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the SBAR-LA rubric in Spanish for assessing structured communication skills in undergraduate nursing students during clinical simulation.
MethodsA two-phase cross-sectional psychometric validation study was conducted. Phase one involved cross-cultural adaptation, including forward and backward translation, expert panel review, and cognitive debriefing with nursing students. Phase two assessed inter-rater reliability using Krippendorff’s alpha based on 97 performance evaluations obtained in different simulation scenarios. The SBAR-LA-Sp rubric contains 10 dichotomous items across the four SBAR dimensions.
ResultsThe Spanish version of the SBAR-LA rubric demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability, with a Krippendorff’s alpha of 0.933 (95% CI: 0.905–0.956). Internal consistency and agreement between raters were also high, confirming the instrument’s robustness.
ConclusionsThe Spanish version of the SBAR-LA rubric provides an objective measure of structured communication in nursing simulation. The findings support its use in academic training. Further research is needed to examine its effect on learning outcomes.
To examine burnout levels, nurse perceptions of the work environment, job satisfaction, intention to stay and quality of care for nurses working in emergency departments before and following a planned change to nurse staffing levels.
A pre-post observational design.
A systematic approach (Nursing Hours per Patient Presentation) was introduced to determine nurse staffing levels based on patient presentations resulting in adjustments to nurse staffing. Data on burnout, the work environment, intention to stay, job satisfaction and quality of care were collected from three emergency departments prior to and following the adjustments to nurse staffing.
An adjustment to nurse staffing levels was made to all three emergency departments. Mean emotional exhaustion scores were significantly lower, and quality of work environment scores and levels of job satisfaction were significantly higher for nurses following staffing adjustments. There was an increase to the proportion of nurses who perceived an improvement in quality of care delivered. In general, the results indicated improvements in outcomes following adjustments to nurse staffing levels.
A more holistic organisational approach is required to address staffing in emergency departments. Initiatives that involve frontline nurses in resource planning facilitating a bottom-up approach to allow for improved work environments would be beneficial.
This study addressed a planned change to nurse staffing levels in emergency departments and staff outcomes pre and post changes to staffing levels.
This study highlighted that staffing an emergency department, based on nursing hours per patient presentation, was associated with improvements in staff outcomes.
The research will impact on nurses working in emergency departments as outcomes from this research were used to develop a Framework for Safe Nurse Staffing and Skill Mix in Emergency Care Settings.
STROBE and SQUIRE checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Despite a lack of evidence relating to effectiveness and safety, the use of apps in the field of mental health is increasing due to their ease of use and accessibility. The aim of the EvalDepApps project is to develop and validate an assessment tool for evaluating depression management apps based on scientific evidence, expert judgement and end-user needs.
The purpose of this study was to determine the most relevant criteria for evaluating apps intended to manage depression through consensus-based assessment.
A total of 43 individuals were invited to participate in an online modified Delphi study of 51 criteria identified from the literature. In Round 1, participants rated criteria according to relevance and three levels of consensus were defined: high level when ≥80% of respondents scored the criterion at 5 or 6; medium when 60%–79% of respondents scored the criterion at 5 or 6 and low when
The response rate was 59.0% (26/43) in Round 1 and 53.4% (23/43) in Round 2. In Round 1, 24 criteria (47.1%) attained the maximum level of consensus, 20 (39.2%) the medium level and 7 (13.7%) the lowest level. In Round 2, 4 out of 20 criteria (20.0%) attained the maximum consensus. Participant comments reinforced the relevance of the selected criteria. The final list consisted of 28 criteria, the majority relating to Safety and Privacy and Clinical Effectiveness (25.0% each), followed by Usability and Functionality (17.9%).
By prioritising criteria relating to data safety and clinical effectiveness, participants in this study emphasised that the assessment of apps for depression management must take both these aspects into full consideration. Despite some limitations of the study (eg, lack of participant sociodemographic data and its implications for generalisation, not face-to-face inter-round), the results of this study will enable the EvalDepApps project to develop an assessment tool for depression management apps that incorporates the most relevant criteria.
EvalDepApps will support healthcare professionals and users in identifying safe, effective and user-friendly depression management apps.
Genomic diagnostics have accelerated therapeutic and preventative breakthroughs in oncology and cancer genetics. Despite increased access, the implementation of genomics-based care faces serious fragmentation and scalability issues due to a lack of system support. The Precision Care Initiative aims to develop a novel and scalable Precision Care Clinic (PCC). It is designed to coordinate precision medicine in oncology and streamline decision support for referring oncologists and geneticists. The PCC will enhance quality of care through multifaceted, patient-centred communication. It will also improve translational capacity by integrating team expertise in precision oncology, implementation science, clinical informatics, cancer genetics, health economics and patient-reported measures.
This programme uses a type I and type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial design sequentially. The complex clinical intervention is precision oncology—matching the targeted treatment or risk management strategy to the right patient, based on their genomic, cancer staging, environmental, lifestyle and biological characteristics, etc. The service intervention is the PCC, providing centralised multidisciplinary review to facilitate shared decision-making with clinicians for the provision of optimal precision oncology care for their patients. The implementation intervention is the co-designed implementation platform—applying evidence-based implementation approaches and Learning Health System principles to enhance feasibility and sustainability. All adult patients across Australia referred to the PCC (n=est. 100–150/year), and healthcare professional interest holders involved in the delivery of precision oncology services, are eligible to participate. Over the study course, phase I involves using a mixed-methods approach to inform iterative co-design and pilot testing of the first PCC with an accompanying implementation platform, and a suite of outcome measures to assess effectiveness; phase II (hybrid type I) includes the implementation of the PCC and evaluation of the outcome measures designed in phase I; phase III (hybrid type II) involves a co-design of local adaptations and testing the effectiveness of the PCC model nationally.
The study received ethical approval from the St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00373). Study results will be presented at relevant conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Lower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current ‘gold standard’ diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a ‘camera in a pill’ that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity.
The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.
We will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice.
The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services.
The study has approval from the North East—Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public.
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) entails substantial morbidity and mortality, yet no epidemiologic evidence exists on its outcomes in Mexico. This study assessed national hospitalisations (2005–2022) and mortality (2000–2022) related to AAV using data from the General Board of Health Information.
Retrospective, population-based time-trend analysis on administrative health data.
Mexico’s national hospital discharge and mortality registries, covering 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2022.
All individuals aged ≥ 15 years with a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis of AAV recorded during hospitalisation or on death certificates nationwide.
The study’s primary outcomes were the age-standardised hospitalisation and mortality rates for AAV (expressed per 100 000 population, overall and by sex), with temporal trends in both rates quantified using Joinpoint regression to calculate annual percent change (APC) and average APC (AAPC).
We identified 2804 hospitalisations and 599 deaths. Females accounted for 49.7% of hospitalisations, while males represented 48.7% of deaths. Although the overall age-standardised hospitalisation rate (ASHR) and mortality rate (ASMR) AAPCs were not statistically significant, relevant trends emerged. From 2010 to 2022, ASHR declined significantly (APC: –5.2%; 95% CI –9.7, –0.5; p=0.03), whereas mortality rates remained stable from 2000 to 2022 (AAPC: +3%; 95% CI –4.6, 11.3; p=0.45). Nevertheless, mortality increased among males (APC: +6.4%; 95% CI 0.9, 12.2; p=0.02) and individuals over 45 years (APC: +8.6%; 95% CI 1.7, 16.0; p=0.02) from 2008 onwards.
Overall, these findings indicate no major changes in national rates but reveal a decline in hospitalisations since 2010 and a rise in mortality for specific subgroups since 2008. Targeted interventions, particularly for older adults and men, appear warranted to address this evolving disease burden. Future research should explore underlying risk factors and evaluate tailored strategies to improve clinical outcomes in AAV across Mexico.
Young-onset type 2 diabetes (YOD), diagnosed before 40 years of age, entails a high disease burden and potential for early dependence on disability benefits. The risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies with socio-economic status and ethnic background, yet the relationship between these factors and age at diagnosis is insufficiently explored. We aimed to study associations between YOD and living on disability benefits, educational level and country background.
Cross-sectional data on 8640 individuals with T2D, linked to data on educational level and country background, were compared with population data from the same residential areas. Similar comparisons were made for data on disability benefits among 3854 individuals of working age (
The risk of being dependent on disability benefits was three times higher in YOD (adjusted incidence rate ratio, aIRR (95% CI) 3.1 (2.7 to 3.5)) and twice as high in later-onset T2D (1.9 (1.8 to 2.1)) as in the general population. People of Norwegian background with low educational levels had threefold higher YOD risk (3.3 (2.4 to 4.4)) than those with a tertiary degree, while people of non-Western backgrounds with low educational levels had a smaller increase in YOD risk (1.5 (1.1 to 2.1)). People of non-Western backgrounds had higher YOD risk than those of Norwegian background (4.2 (3.5 to 5.0)), while people of south Asian background had an even greater relative YOD risk (9.0 (7.3 to 11.0)), threefold higher than for later-onset T2D (3.2 (2.8 to 3.7)).
Lifetime risk of being dependent on disability benefits was substantially higher for individuals with YOD than in later onset T2D. Non-Western and particularly south Asian backgrounds were associated with increased YOD risk. Low education was an important YOD risk factor only for people with Norwegian background.
Indigenous Mayan-Yucatecan communities in Mexico have a high prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity and rheumatic diseases (RMDs). According to the syndemic theory, these diseases combined with social, economic and cultural factors affect the quality of life. The aim of this protocol is to describe the methodological process to create, implement and evaluate a Syndemic-Based Care Model (SCM), using a Community Based-Participatory Research (CBPR) strategy in three Mayan-Yucatecan communities.
This is a convergent mixed-methods protocol. The quantitative component is a before-after study, and the qualitative component is an ethnographic study. The intervention will be a SCM co-constructed with Mayan communities based on their particular needs and aiming for reduction of the negative impact of NCD/RMD through a multidisciplinary approach. We will follow four phases of the CBPR: (1) situational analysis, through community censuses and semistructured interviews to understand the prevalence of NCDs and the syndemics in these communities; (2) co-construction of the elements of a SCM based on the health priorities identified by researchers, community members and healthcare workers; (3) implementation of this SCM and (4) evaluation of the SCM through (1) statistical analyses involving the construction of a syndemic index through stepwise logistic regression of the normalised and standardised key clinical, social and economic variables; interval and ratio variables will be normalised by their z-score and categorical variables will be one-hot encoded; similarity and social networks analysis with clustering to identify syndemic subpopulations; and cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses using Markov modelling and (2) narrative and thematic qualitative analysis of the SCM’s implementation and impact on community members’ health, function and quality of life.
Research ethics boards of participant institutions approved this research protocol. This project will be presented to municipal authorities, community meetings and community leaders for observation and acceptance. For people who wish to participate, informed consent will be provided written and verbally in Spanish or Mayan-Yucatecan according to the participant preferences, and it can be signed by either autograph or fingerprint. The results of this research will be disseminated to various groups: (a) local and regional authorities of the Mexican health system and municipal authorities; (b) the participating communities will be informed in an assembly of the results and (c) academic dissemination will be done through publications in public science journals and institutional press releases and will also be presented at national and international congresses or symposia.
Endovascular therapy is the main treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia in the UK. Despite a restenosis risk of 50% over 2 years, reintervention rates are low, potentially resulting in preventable amputations. European guidelines recommend ultrasound surveillance to facilitate early treatment of restenosis. This study will investigate the use of duplex ultrasound after endo revascularisation (DUSTER). The aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact on clinical decision-making of a 1-year integrated ultrasound surveillance programme after lower limb endovascular therapy.
DUSTER is a mixed-methods study. Phase I is a three-site, feasibility, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The standard of care, the control arm, is standard clinical surveillance by a vascular specialist at 1, 6 and 12 months. The intervention arm will receive integrated ultrasound (ankle-brachial pressure index, toe pressure and duplex) plus standard clinical surveillance. Primary outcomes are rates of attendance and completion of ultrasound surveillance tests, as well as the percentage of participants undergoing reintervention for restenosis. Secondary outcomes are limb salvage, amputation-free survival, reasons for amputation, complications, serious adverse events and mortality.
Phase II comprises independent semistructured interviews with intervention arm participants. The interviews will explore barriers and facilitators to ultrasound surveillance and the effect of ultrasound surveillance on patients’ lives.
Phase III has two separate focus groups for participants and clinical stakeholders to identify which outcomes matter most in any subsequent large-scale effectiveness trials.
This research has been approved by a UK (West Midlands, Black Country) Research Ethics Committee (reference 24/WM/0232) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS 349192). Dissemination of results will be by the DUSTER co-investigators in peer-reviewed journals, to the National Institute for Health and Care Research and to a lay audience via the Mid and South Essex NHS Foundations Trust website.
To evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition care delivered by general practitioners (GPs) compared with usual or no care on dietary and health outcomes in adults with diet-related chronic conditions or risk states and to examine which intervention components are associated with effectiveness.
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE and ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases were searched in October 2021 and updated in February 2024 for articles related to GPs, nutrition care and diet-related health outcomes.
Published RCTs were included according to the following criteria: adults with or at risk of diet-related chronic conditions; nutrition care delivered by GPs in the primary care setting; usual or no care as comparators; and dietary and/or health outcomes with a minimum 3-month follow-up. No restriction was placed on the date of publication.
Duplicates were reconciled in EndNote. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts and full texts in Covidence. Two independent reviewers completed the critical appraisal and data extraction. Disagreements were resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. The Motivation Actions and Prompts (MAP) framework was used to analyse the behaviour change components of study interventions. Results were reported using narrative synthesis and certainty in findings was summarised using GRADEpro GDT software.
Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria (5744 patients). The trials were conducted in Australia, Italy and the USA from 1991 to 2013, with follow-up periods from 3 to 12 months. A consistent effect in favour of the intervention was found for diet scores (2 RCTs, 3038 participants). Other outcomes had mixed effects: (1) fat intake (2 RCTs, 2299 participants) – one study with an effect in favour of the intervention and one with mixed effects; (2) blood pressure (3 RCTs, 3063 participants) – one study with mixed effects and two with no effect; (3) body mass index (6 RCTs, 5538 participants) – two studies with an effect in favour of the intervention, two with no effect and two reporting no between group differences; (4) body weight (2 RCTs, 511 participants) – one study with an effect in favour of the intervention and one with no effect and (5) cholesterol (4 RCTs, 2505 participants) – one study with an effect in favour of the intervention and three with mixed effects and/or limited reporting. All studies had a motivation and action route to behaviour change and two had a prompted component, according to the MAP framework. The interventions spanned nine behaviour change groupings and 16 behaviour change techniques. There was a very low certainty of findings in all cases and the studies were of low to moderate methodological quality.
There is mixed evidence of the effectiveness of GP-delivered nutrition care among adults with diet-related chronic conditions or risk states. Additionally, most interventions did not include prompting and had a limited range of behaviour change techniques. The effectiveness of nutrition care delivered by GPs is an understudied area that warrants greater experimental investigation and requires more robust methods and reporting.
CRD42021289011.
Introducción: La motivación cumple un rol fundamental sobre todo en el desempeño laboral del profesional de Enfermería. Esta motivación representa un factor protector tanto para el profesional de Enfermería como también al paciente que se encuentra a su cuidado. Se objetivó analizar la relación existente entre factores motivacionales y desempeño laboral del profesional de Enfermería quienes ejercen funciones en dos hospitales del departamento Central 2023. Metodología. Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal realizado en dos centros asistenciales de referencia nacional, de alta complejidad de la República del Paraguay, muestreo no probabilístico por conveniencia. El instrumento, un cuestionario pre-elaborado y validado. Resultados. Respeto al desempeño laboral, predominó el nivel alto. En referencia a las dimensiones del desempeño laboral, ha predominado mayoritariamente el nivel alto, no registrándose ningún participante en el nivel bajo. Al relacionar los factores motivacionales con el desempeño laboral, se encontró asociación estadísticamente significativa, con lo que se acepta la hipótesis de investigación que indica que existe asociación entre factores motivacionales y el desempeño laboral de profesionales de enfermería. Discusión. Al relacionar los factores motivacionales con el desempeño laboral, se observó una asociación estadísticamente significativa. Esto se respalda en un estudio realizado en Perú, cuyos resultados sugieren que el desempeño laboral de los profesionales de enfermería estaría influenciado por la dependencia de factores motivacionales extrínsecos. Conclusión: Se recomienda fortalecer programas de reconocimiento y mejora de condiciones laborales para estimular la motivación extrínseca, como implementar oportunidades de desarrollo profesional y participación en la toma de decisiones.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Motivation plays a fundamental role, especially in the work performance of nursing professionals. This motivation represents a protective factor for both the nursing professional and the patient under their care. The objective was to analyze the existing relationship between motivational factors and work performance of nursing professionals who work in two hospitals in the Central department 2023. Methodology. A cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study carried out in two national reference, highly complex healthcare centers in the Republic of Paraguay, using a non-probabilistic convenience sampling. The instrument was a pre-prepared and validated questionnaire. Results. Regarding work performance, a high level predominated. Regarding the dimensions of work performance, the high level predominated, with no participants registered at the low level. When relating motivational factors with work performance, a statistically significant association was found, thereby accepting the research hypothesis that indicates an association between motivational factors and the work performance of nursing professionals. Discussion. When relating motivational factors to job performance, a statistically significant association was observed. This is supported by a study conducted in Peru, whose results suggest that nursing professionals' job performance may be influenced by their dependence on extrinsic motivational factors. Conclusion. Strengthen recognition programs and improve working conditions is recommended to stimulate extrinsic motivation, such as implementing opportunities for professional development and participation in decision-making.
To determine the prevalence of MARSI associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in oncology and haematology patients, analyse the type of injury and identify risk factors.
A prospective descriptive study was conducted from 9 June 2021 to 8 February 2022. The study population was oncology and haematology patients with a PICC. The variables to be studied included the presence of MARSI in relation to PICC maintenance, injury type, time to onset, mean healing time, and type of treatment received. A descriptive analysis of the entire sample was performed. Chi-square and Student's t-test or Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to identify risk factors, depending on the nature of the variables.
The sample studied was 342 PICCs inserted in 309 patients, 49% (n = 169) women, and the mean overall age was 62.12 years (SD: 12.33). Seventy-six per cent were oncology and 24% haematology patients. The prevalence of MARSI was 32% (n = 111). The most common type of injury was erythema in 39% (n = 42). The mean duration of the lesion was 20.90 days (SD: 31.44). Alkylating agents, among others, were identified as a risk factor.
The results indicate a high prevalence of MARSI. In agreement with the literature, mechanical injuries are the most frequent, and some antineoplastic treatments are a risk factor. This study may help to identify areas for improvement and design strategies for the prevention and treatment of MARSI.
This study has implications for clinical practice, as it helps to identify areas for improvement and the most relevant clinical practice guideline recommendations to avoid this adverse event.
No patient or public contribution.
Advanced simulation is a methodology that allows the development of technical skills and transversal skills such as teamwork and leadership. There are tools to measure the development of technical competencies and student satisfaction with the methodology, but not to measure the development and use of transversal competencies in the clinical practice setting.
To develop and validate a scale to measure the impact of clinical simulation on the development and application of teamwork and leadership competencies.
A multicentre study was carried out in two Spanish universities in which the Clinical Simulation Learning Teamwork and Leadership Scale was developed and validated.
The study was carried out in several phases: development of the questionnaire using a Delphi method, pilot test and validation of the construct with a sample of 207 nursing students. Reporting of this research adheres to STROBE guidelines.
Content validity was checked according to Aiken's V for the three attributes of the questionnaire. Reliability or internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α and the sensitivity analysis showed no significant variation when any item was eliminated. On the other hand, McDonald's Omega statistic was used. Intraobserver reliability was taken from a sample of 47 students, in which it was observed that the intraclass correlation was positive.
The Clinical Simulation Learning teamwork and leadership scale is a valid instrument for measuring the development of transversal competencies.
This scale will provide information to evaluate the weight of the clinical simulation in the students' knowledge.
It is a tool for evaluating transversal skills that is proven valid and will improve the training of students.
The instructions of the STROBE checklist have been followed.
The students have participated in the knowledge transfer self-assessment.
Introducción. Las intervenciones de música en directo pueden ayudar a mejorar el bienestar tanto psicológico como físico, emocional y espiritual. El presente proyecto nace de un trabajo colaborativo e interdisciplinar entre dos titulaciones de grado: Enfermería e Interpretación Musical. Objetivos. Analizar la efectividad de una intervención musical en directo en el bienestar de pacientes oncológicos. Metodología. Se plantea un estudio de diseño mixto. Un estudio cuasiexperimental sin aleatorización para evaluar el efecto de la intervención con grupo un control (N=33) y experimental (N=33) durante la administración del tratamiento en un hospital de día oncológico. Se recogerán variables sociodemográficas y clínicas (nivel de ansiedad, afectividad y signos vitales). También se analizarán los niveles de ansiedad y variación en los signos vitales en los intérpretes (estudiantes de música) antes y después de los ensayos y de la intervención. Se diseña un estudio cualitativo fenomenológico-hermenéutico para conocer las experiencias de los pacientes y los intérpretes tras la intervención musical. Aplicabilidad práctica. En este proyecto se destaca la importancia de la colaboración entre estudiantes de dos disciplinas complementarias en contextos sanitarios reales.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. Live music interventions can help enhance psychological, physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. This research project stems from a collaborative and interdisciplinary effort between two undergraduate programs: Nursing and Musical Performance. Objectives. To analyze the effectiveness of a live music intervention on the well-being of oncology patients. Methodology. A mixed-methods study design is proposed. A quasi-experimental study without randomization will evaluate the effect of the intervention with a control group (N=33) and an experimental group (N=33) during chemotherapy treatment administration in a day hospital. Sociodemographic and clinical variables (anxiety levels, affectivity, and vital signs) will be collected. The levels of anxiety and changes in vital signs in the performers (music students) will be analyzed before and after rehearsals and the intervention. A phenomenological-hermeneutic qualitative study is designed to understand the experiences of the patients and performers after the musical intervention. Practical Applicability. This project emphasizes the importance of collaboration between students from two complementary disciplines in real healthcare settings, starting from their formative stages.
The current study aimed to identify digital health literacy levels among nurses with respect to their education, role and attitude towards digital technologies.
Cross-sectional study.
Through convenience sampling, all Registered Nurses, managers/leaders and nurse researchers employed in Hospitals, University Hospitals and Districts were recruited and surveyed using an online questionnaire. The data collection tool assessed: (I) demographics, (II) Digital Health Literacy (DHL) with the Health Literacy Survey19 Digital (HLS19-DIGI) instrument including DHL dealing with digital health information (HL-DIGI), interaction with digital resources for health (HL-DIGI-INT) and use of digital devices for health (HL-DIGI-DD); (III) attitudes on the use of digital technologies in clinical practice. The multiple correspondence analysis was applied to identify three clusters for the education/professional role (A, B, C) and three for digital technologies' use (1, 2, 3). The one-way nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis test) was applied to compare HL-DIGI, HL-DIGI-INT and the HL-DIGI-DD scores among clusters.
Among 551 participants, the median scores of the HL-DIGI, the HL-DIGI-INT and the HL-DIGI-DD questionnaires were 70.2, 72 and 2.00, respectively. The distribution in the clusters ‘educational/professional role’ was A, (58.8%); B, (16.5%); and C, (24.7%). Nurses in a managerial or coordinator role and with a postgraduate degree used digital resources with greater frequency. The distribution in the clusters ‘use of digital technologies’ was: 1, (54.6%); 2, (12.2%); and 3, (33.2%). The HL-DIGI-DD and HL-DIGI scores of clusters 1, 2 and 3 differed significantly.
DHL among nurses is strongly influenced by the education level, professional role, habits and attitude towards digital technologies. Nurses with coordinator roles used digital technologies with greater frequency and had a higher level of DHL.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used for reporting.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Trial Registration: Local Ethical Committee of the Polyclinic of Bari (code: DHL7454, date: 21/09/22)
Objetivo principal: Intentar clarificar dos conceptos utilizados en la actualidad que suelen confundirse como son placebo y efecto placebo. Metodología: Revisión. Resultados principales: El placebo en psicología juega un papel fundamental para entender los mecanismos de la psicoterapia y de su real alcance. La administración de placebo en la práctica clínica es importante y puede potenciar un determinado procedimiento o intervención. Conclusión principal: Los pacientes con patologías psiquiátricas se benefician con el consumo de placebos. Se ha planteado que la respuesta de mejoría en los síntomas depresivos se debe en gran parte al efecto placebo y no a los medicamentos. Con respecto al estrés y la ansiedad, el placebo parece ser más efectivo en sujetos altamente ansiosos y los efectos del placebo son atribuidos frecuentemente a la reducción de la ansiedad y disminución del sufrimiento.
FreshRSS 