Conectar
To assess the quality of the Spanish Triage System performed by nurses according to the triage code assigned to each patient and to examine factors associated with the need for re-evaluation after completion of triage.
Retrospective longitudinal observational study.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients triaged in the emergency department between 2018 and 2023. Patients triaged by other healthcare professionals and those who did not receive a triage priority level were excluded.
493,211 episodes were analysed. Most were low/intermediate acuity (Level IV 65.4%, Level III 23.9%; Level I 0.1%). Mean time-to-first physician record entry increased as acuity decreased (38 min Level I vs. 81 min Level V), yet recorded time-target compliance was lowest in Levels I–II (23.8% and 14.7%). Re-evaluation occurred more often in high-acuity levels and was independently associated with older age, male sex, lower oxygen saturation and longer emergency department length of stay; compared with Level I, Levels II–III and lower adjusted odds of re-evaluation.
Nurse-led triage demonstrated coherent clinical and operational stratification; however, the lowest recorded time-target compliance in the sickest patients suggests a gap between immediate care and electronic documentation.
Streamline documentation workflows for high-acuity cases and use re-evaluation risk profiles to prioritize monitoring and escalation.
Evidence on nurse-led Spanish Triage System performance and time-documentation quality is limited. Acuity and flow metrics showed expected gradients, but target-time compliance was lowest in Levels I–II; predictors of re-evaluation were also identified. Findings support emergency department nursing, quality improvement and potential benefits for patients attending emergency departments.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The clinical practicum is a critical component of nursing education. In Spain, it is currently facing systemic challenges that compromise its quality and sustainability. A persistent nursing shortage, combined with increasing pressure on healthcare systems and a growing number of students intended to address this gap, is adding strain to clinical learning environments, which may compromise the capacity of nurses to provide adequate supervision and meaningful learning experiences for nursing students. This not only diminishes the quality of the training experiences, but also negatively affects the well-being of both students and nurses, further worsening the situation. This protocol outlines a study aimed at conducting an in-depth analysis of the current challenges affecting the clinical practicum and proposing a new model that effectively addresses them, with significant potential for adaptation and implementation across different health education fields and geographical locations.
The study will employ a sequential mixed-methods design comprising two integrated phases. In phase I, quantitative, qualitative and scoping review methodologies will be combined to identify current challenges and opportunities. Quantitative data will be obtained by administering questionnaires to nursing students and clinical mentors (CMs) tutoring them in Catalonia, examining potential barriers and facilitators to their mentoring role. Data will be analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data will emerge from semistructured interviews with CMs and nurse coordinators, as well as from a visual elicitation technique, the ‘Emojional’ Calendar, conducted with students to understand their clinical practicum experiences. These will be analysed through an inductive thematic analysis approach. The scoping review, following the Arksey and O’Malley framework, will identify best practices in clinical practicums in nursing and other health studies globally. Phase II will involve a three-round qualitative Delphi study in which all preceding results will be presented to stakeholders and decision makers in order to redesign the clinical practicum model.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Hospital del Mar Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref #2023/11123). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, as well as via strategic actions (forums and meetings with healthcare managers, deans and policymakers) and general outreach (talks, social media and websites) targeted at professionals, students and the public.
Increasing demand for haematological specialist care makes the optimisation of referrals and outpatient workflow a priority. Automated placing of standardised test orders prior to the first appointment may provide haematologists with necessary information to reach diagnoses and initiate treatment at the first patient encounter, reducing low-value follow-up appointments. We aimed to evaluate rates of patient participation in an initiative using artificial intelligence to place standardised test orders as well as reasons for non-participation, differences in the number of participants and non-participants discharged back to primary care with a diagnosis or appropriate treatment plan, and potentially avoidable referrals.
A retrospective, multicentric cohort study.
Four academic hospitals in Madrid, Spain.
18 190 patients referred for a first haematologist appointment for 11 included presenting complaints.
Referral notes from primary care were classified using natural language processing and automated placement of standardised test order sets was carried out prior to first appointment for participating patients.
We compared demographic differences between participants and non-participants, the main motives for not participating, and the number of patients discharged back to primary care at first appointment with a diagnosis and treatment plan. Most frequent International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision codes for each of the included presenting complaints were described.
During the study period, 18 190 (41%) patients were referred for a first haematologist appointment for presenting complaints included in the intervention (‘eligible patients’), of which 612 (3.3%) patients agreed to participate in the intervention. Participants were significantly younger than non-participants. Most common motives for not participating were administrative reasons (6268, 76.9%). Only 122 (1.5%) patients expressed explicit unwillingness to participate. A significant increase in the number of patients discharged upon first appointment was observed for participants (146 (23.9%) vs 3375 (19.36%); p=0.041), signifying a 22% relative reduction in avoidable follow-up. The diagnosis ‘haematological disorders ruled out’ was constantly observed as one of the ten most common diagnoses made by the haematology specialist for all but one of the included presenting complaints.
Natural language processing of referrals from primary to specialist haematology care with automated placing of standardised test orders can decrease low-value follow-up appointments. Explicit refusal to participate was low. Participants tended to be younger than non-participants, underlining the importance of designing strategies to target the older population in order to improve participation.
To investigate factors influencing the implementation of advanced practice nursing roles within healthcare organisations in seven European countries from the perspective of advanced practice nurses.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between September 2021 and December 2022, involving advanced practice nurses from Belgium, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Spain and the Netherlands. The countries were selected to represent different stages of implementing advanced practice nursing roles, from emerging to well-established.
A self-administered questionnaire was used to address five domains: patient care, practice patterns, policy and legal, educational and workforce-related factors. Descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests and correspondence analysis were employed to identify patterns and country-specific differences across these domains of implementation factors.
A total of 491 advanced practice nurses participated in the study. While almost three-quarters of the participants indicated satisfaction with their job, the study highlighted multifaceted factors influencing the implementation of advanced practice nursing roles across countries. The Netherlands, Ireland and Belgium reported mainly facilitators, whereas Finland, Iceland and Germany noted barriers or a lack of knowledge. Spain mostly reported neutral or moderate positions. Key challenges included role ambiguity, interprofessional collaboration gaps, limited managerial support, workload imbalances, limited mentorship and underutilised competencies. Results also indicated that advanced practice nurses are partially hindered by operating in isolation from other professions.
The findings emphasise the need for robust organisational support, interprofessional collaboration and clear role definitions to facilitate the integration of advanced practice nursing roles. Addressing professional isolation through networking and mentorship is crucial to sustaining the advanced practice nursing workforce.
Policy should prioritise support for advanced practice nursing, including structured mentoring and networking opportunities. Further research on advanced practice nurses' well-being and long-term role sustainability in Europe is recommended.
What problem did the study address? What were the main findings? Where and on whom will the research have an impact?
This study reported factors influencing advanced practice nurse role implementation across seven European countries with different levels of role development. Key challenges included role ambiguity, interprofessional collaboration gaps and limited support. The findings can guide healthcare managers and policymakers on the key factors to consider when integrating advanced practice nursing roles into their teams.
To explore nursing professionals' perceptions of the intersectional positioning of their profession within healthcare and society, examining how axes of oppression shape healthcare responses and resource management.
A qualitative study framed in critical theory paradigm employing constructivist grounded theory, as outlined by Charmaz.
The study was conducted in Catalonia, Spain, between 2022 and 2023. A total of 26 nursing professionals participated, representing a range of professional roles and settings. Theoretical sampling guided participant recruitment and was saturated after 17 in-depth interviews and 2 thematic focus groups. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis, informed by Charmaz's approach, was applied to identify key dimensions and themes. Intersectionality theory was used as a critical analysis framework.
A predominant theme emerged from data identified as ‘intersectional disempowerment of nursing profession’. Four categories shape this positioning: (1) symbolic and historical undervaluation of care, rooted in nursing's feminization and patriarchal norms; (2) patriarchal influence on professional leadership, manifested by men disproportionately occupy leadership roles, reinforcing vertical segregation; (3) intra-professional hierarchies and technocratic influence, forcing prestige disparities within nursing and promoting horizontal segregation; and (4) internalised barriers among nurses regarding professional prestige, authority and recognition which combined undermine nursing's visibility, legitimacy and influence within healthcare.
Nursing cannot be understood as a neutral profession. Its societal positioning is deeply shaped by structural inequities, gendered assumptions and entrenched hierarchies, which collectively undermine its potential for autonomy and recognition.
This study highlights the need to challenge intersectional hierarchies in nursing, promoting equitable recognition, policy reforms and leadership opportunities to enhance nurses' authority, visibility and professional empowerment within healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges requires systemic policy reforms and a critical re-evaluation of societal perceptions. What problem did the study address? Nursing's social image is strongly shaped by biomedical, technocratic and social views. The gap between nursing's public image and identity limits professional growth and recognition. Analysing how power relations intersect in nursing's social position is essential. What were the main findings? Nursing's role is shaped by the intersection of gender, prestige, socioeconomic status and social recognition. Nurses' empowerment must be tied to transforming unjust institutions and systemic structures. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study provides a critical analysis of the intersectional positioning of the nursing profession. The findings have implications at multiple levels: micro, by offering nurses a critical perspective on their professional positionality; meso, by providing healthcare managers with insights into the underlying factors contributing to nursing's undervaluation; and macro, by fostering reflection within the broader healthcare community on the power dynamics shaping interprofessional relationships.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
The manuscript is based on the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
To explore how older women experiencing poverty in a high-income country perceive their family caregiver role from a gender perspective.
Descriptive qualitative study.
A convenience sample of seventeen older female caregivers experiencing poverty was interviewed in-depth between October 2023 and March 2024. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted following the phases described by Braun & Clarke. ATLAS.ti software was used for data analysis.
Three main themes were developed from the data analysis: (1) The duality of family caregiving: between informal female support and structural neglect, (2) family care in later life as a continuation of a life devoted to others, (3) older female family caregiving as a gender issue.
Older female caregivers experiencing poverty have limited formal support and unequal access to resources. Older women experiencing poverty experience both gratitude and despair in their caregiving role, which inevitably deteriorates their health.
Nursing interventions for older female caregivers experiencing poverty should include an assessment of social determinants of health, focusing on gender and socio-economic barriers. Implementing system navigation interventions, such as community-based case management, resource referral programmes, and personalised care coordination, could connect older female family caregivers to essential resources and support networks, thus addressing their mental health needs and promoting equity, which would enhance their overall well-being and dignity.
Experiencing poverty increases the vulnerability of older female caregivers, exacerbating gender inequality. These women often face mental health issues as they face the pressure of meeting their own needs and those of their care recipients with a lack of formal support. This neglect can lead to serious health problems, which emphasises the need for equitable nursing interventions.
The study is reported following the COREQ guidelines.
No patients or public were involved in the study development and implementation.
To determine the application rate of the preventive measures, alternate air anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes in patients who develop hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) on the basis of their preventive or reactive temporality.
This is an ambispective observational study that included adult patients without pressure injuries admitted to Mancha Centro Hospital (Spain) who developed at least one HAPI during hospitalisation (August 2022 to March 2023).
The main variables were the implementation of preventive measures and the time of their application. Other variables were comorbidities, sociodemographic and clinical variables, Braden and Barthel scale, variables related to the application of preventive measures and information to characterise HAPI.
180 patients who developed 276 HAPI during their admission were included; 73.9% of the patients received a risk assessment upon admission, and 53.9% were re-evaluated. At some point during admission, an anti-decubitus mattress was placed in 73.3% of the patients, and 76.1% received postural changes.
Among the patients at risk at the time of HAPI onset, 49.4% had received anti-decubitus mattress preventively, 23.9% had received it reactively, and 26.7% did not receive it. Among the patients without contraindication for postural changes, 51.4% received them before the lesions appeared, 33.6% received them after the lesions appeared, and 13.6% did not receive them.
We detected a significant association between the preventive application of anti-decubitus mattress and postural changes with the Braden reassessment; admission to the intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, nasogastric tube; mental state confused; hospital isolation; low Barthel and Braden scores; impaired mobility; inability to perform postural changes; diaper; urinary/faecal incontinence; and sedatives.
Only approximately half of the patients received preventive measures. Although patients with a more unfavourable clinical profile were more likely to receive these measures, increased awareness and training among healthcare professionals are necessary to ensure broader and more consistent implementation of preventive strategies.
This study explores the real-world use of preventive measures in hospitalized patients who develop HAPI. In half of the patients, these measures were applied reactively, highlighting the need to introduce strategies that facilitate the implementation of evidence-based practices.
This study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for cross-sectional studies.
In the present study, data from patients have been obtained, but the patients or caregivers have not contributed to the development of the manuscript.
The aim is to explore co-design facilitators’ perspectives and experiences of using co-design to improve intrapartum care in four sub-Saharan African settings. The inquiry focuses particularly on how they fostered engagement, built trust and mitigated unintended consequences during the co-design process.
Qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis.
Sixteen public and private not-for-profit hospital-based maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda (four per country).
A total population sample of 10 co-design facilitators involved in a hospital-based co-design project implemented in maternity units in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted between December 2022 and January 2023.
Co-design facilitators viewed co-design as a collaborative process to develop contextually relevant solutions. Our findings elucidate their role in facilitating consensus-building and fostering stakeholder ownership amidst significant power divides. They described approaches co-design facilitators take to maintain ongoing stakeholder engagement and manage misaligned expectations in a trusting and collaborative environment, while being mindful of existing tensions and power imbalances. They also highlighted key challenges faced, including navigating norms, power imbalances and unintended consequences.
This study underscores the importance of power-sharing, fostering ownership and engaging end users equitably and continuously in co-design efforts, while also being aware of how to address its potential unintended consequences. Further research is needed to understand co-design facilitators’ impact on co-design and how to address unintended consequences for stakeholders during and after co-design activities in intrapartum interventions in low-resource settings.
Total alloplastic replacement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a viable treatment option for severe TMJ disorders (TMDs) unresponsive to conservative approaches, as well as for reconstruction of congenital or acquired TMJ defects. However, clinical data on indications, outcomes, complications and long-term effects remain limited, and no global registry currently exists. This study aims to address this gap by establishing an international registry to collect data from patients undergoing total alloplastic TMJ replacement systematically. The registry will document clinical indications and disease progression, explore relationships between treatments, outcomes and quality of life, identify predictors of favourable outcomes and inform future research.
This international, prospective, multicentre, observational registry will enrol approximately 200 patients with TMD requiring total alloplastic TMJ replacement, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years postoperatively. The data collected will include underlying disease, treatment details, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. The registry will also monitor patients who decline surgery and record their reasons. All treatments will adhere to the standard of care at each participating centre.
Ethics approval was obtained from the responsible ethics committee (EC) at each participating site prior to TMJ surgery. All patients will be enrolled following an informed consent process approved by the relevant EC. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.
Approving ECs include: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital EC, KCDS/Ethical Comm/54/2022–23; Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, 2019–02387; University of Belgrade School of Dental Medicine EC, 36/19; National Videnskabsetisk Komité, 2401881; University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research EC, BREC/00001592/2020; Etikprövningsmyndigheten, 2019–04477; Ethikkommission Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 8660_BO_K_2019; Ethik-Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, 080/21-lk; Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 19/392; Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz EC, 2025–18012-andere Forschung/nachberatend; Local Ethical Committee at National Medical and Surgical Centre named after NI Pirogoov, LEC meeting 5; Ethikkommission bei der LMU München, 19–589; Komisja Bioetyczna przy Warmiłsko-Mazurskiej Izbie Lekarskiej w Olsztynie, 12/2021; De Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC, MEC-2019–0696 and Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, 3.825.711.
This study aims to explore how age and gender are associated with health deterioration related to caregiving among caregivers aged 75 and older in Spain.
Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Nationwide survey in Spain: 2020 Survey on Disability, Personal Autonomy and Situations of Dependency.
All non-professional caregivers identified by the survey (3746): 3166 caregivers younger than 75 (CG75–) and 580 caregivers 75 years old or older (CG75+).
Self-reported caregivers’ health deterioration, as a categorical variable (present or absent).
The majority of caregivers in both groups were women (63.2% of CG75– and 57.0% of CG75+, p=0.011). CG75+ provided care 16 hours/day (vs 14.1 hours/day of CG75–, p=0.032). Over half of CG75+ reported health deterioration (53.0%), compared with 43.5% of CG75– (p
In Spain, older caregivers have a specific socio-demographic profile, provide high-intensity care and report a higher caregiving-related health deterioration. However, the association between older age and health deterioration was found only in women. Public health interventions must prioritise older female caregivers.
Integrated digital diagnostics can support complex surgeries in many anatomic sites, and brain tumour surgery represents one of the most complex cases. Neurosurgeons face several challenges during brain tumour surgeries, such as differentiating critical tissue from brain tumour margins. To overcome these challenges, the STRATUM project will develop a 3D decision support tool for brain surgery guidance and diagnostics based on multimodal data processing, including hyperspectral imaging, integrated as a point-of-care computing tool in neurosurgical workflows. This paper reports the protocol for the development and technical validation of the STRATUM tool.
This international multicentre, prospective, open, observational cohort study, STRATUM-OS (study: 28 months, pre-recruitment: 2 months, recruitment: 20 months, follow-up: 6 months), with no control group, will collect data from 320 patients undergoing standard neurosurgical procedures to: (1) develop and technically validate the STRATUM tool and (2) collect the outcome measures for comparing the standard procedure versus the standard procedure plus the use of the STRATUM tool during surgery in a subsequent historically controlled non-randomised clinical trial.
The protocol was approved by the participant ethics committees. Results will be disseminated in scientific conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
by Verónica Martínez-Borba, Andrés E. Rodríguez-Márquez, Sara Garcés-Arilla, Óscar Peris-Baquero, María Vicenta Navarro-Haro, Esther del Corral-Beamonte, Jorge Osma
BackgroundLong COVID-19 is a medical condition associated with persistent physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms. Despite its significant impact, there are still few psychological interventions—especially with transdiagnostic approaches— that have been rigorously tested in this population. The aim of the present protocol is to describe a randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of the online, group-delivered Unified Protocol (UP) for improving emotional, and cognitive outcomes in adults with long COVID-19. We expect greater improvements in emotional and cognitive outcomes for the UP group compared to controls. Additionally, exploratory analyses will assess changes in neurocognitive performance and hair cortisol/cortisone levels as potential correlates of treatment response.
Methods90 individuals diagnosed with long COVID-19 will be randomized to an experimental group or a waiting-list control group (1:1 ratio). Participants in the experimental group will receive the UP across 12 online group sessions. Longitudinal assessments (pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups) will include psychological (e.g., anxiety and depressive symptoms) and cognitive outcomes (e.g., memory failures). Participants in the experimental group will also complete neuropsychological tests and will provide hair samples for the assessment of cortisol/cortisone levels.
Data analysesBaseline characteristics will be described using descriptive statistics, and linear mixed-effects models will evaluate the effects of time, group, and their interaction on psychological and cognitive outcomes. Neuropsychological performance and hair cortisol levels will be analyzed over time in the experimental group. Associations between cortisol and psychological or cognitive measures will be explored through correlational analyses.
ConclusionsWe expect positive outcomes after the intervention in acceptability and in emotional symptoms and cognitive complaints in individuals living with long COVID-19, the maintenance of the benefits in all follow-ups, and statistically significant changes in favor of the UP condition in comparison with the waiting-list control group. If effective, the UP could provide an accessible and evidence-based psychological treatment for this population, improving the quality of healthcare to individuals with long COVID-19.
Trial registrationclinicatrials.gov (registration identifier: NCT06928480; May 22, 2025).
To understand the political, economic, social and technological facilitators and barriers in obtaining an HIV diagnosis to inform implementation strategies for HIV diagnostics in the Dominican Republic (DR).
In-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews.
A high complexity public hospital in Santiago de los Caballeros, DR.
A convenience and purposive sample of 36 internal medicine physicians and laboratory personnel involved in sample collection, sample analysis or oversight of biological sample analysis.
Using the Social Ecological Model, our results highlighted several interrelated barriers and facilitators to sample analysis at the individual (patient), interpersonal (interactions between laboratory personnel, physicians and patients), organisational (the hospital), community (Santiago de Los Caballeros) and societal (the DR) levels. Some key findings include the importance of psychological support in receiving an HIV diagnosis, how spoken language can be a barrier to care, how inconsistent access to laboratory supplies is a barrier for patients, laboratory personnel and clinicians, and the importance of government public health investment.
Employing qualitative methods to investigate a bioengineering challenge yielded rich data on the sociotechnical implementation context of HIV diagnostics in the DR. Several context-relevant suggestions were developed for HIV diagnostic developers which include incorporating psychological support into the diagnosis workflow, delivering information in multiple languages (ie, Haitian Creole and Spanish) and with non-stigmatising phrasing, working with the public sector to develop and implement technologies, and reducing the supply chain reliance on high-income countries to lessen delays in care. These findings can apply to other types of health technologies and settings and demonstrate the importance of utilizing human-centered design to understand implementation context and promote global health equity in health technology development and adoption.
Objetivo: Interpretar las experiencias vividas del mundo subjetivo en mujeres violentadas por su pareja. Metodología: Estudio cualitativo en base a la Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa, realizado con 14 mujeres que acudieron al Taller de Relaciones Saludables implementado por la Secretaria de Salud de Aguascalientes. Se aplicó una entrevista semi-estructurada conformada por 7 preguntas sobre el mundo subjetivo. Resultados: Se obtuvieron 20 códigos que permitieron definir el siguiente fenómeno: La aceptación de la violencia como un estilo de vida, sin comprender el por qué permitir el abuso, lo cual origina sentimientos de autodestrucción física, emocional y familiar. Conclusiones: La sociedad ha construido una falsa igualdad cultural entre el hombre y la mujer; sin embargo, la ideología de la unión familiar le ha impedido a la mujer que se empodere y decida su forma de vida, esto lo transmiten a sus familias y éstas a su vez educan de tal forma a las mujeres, para que acepten “la vida que les tocó vivir”.
RESUMEN:
Introducción: las representaciones culturales y sociales de las madres de las comunidades indígenas andinas determinan el tipo de padecimiento y la ruta terapéutica a seguir.
Objetivo: Identificar los síndromes culturalmente delimitados que describen las mujeres Kichwas — en Chugchilán-Ecuador— en el contexto de los cuidados materno-infantiles, así como sus causas, sintomatología y tratamientos. Metodología: Estudio etnográfico, llevado a cabo entre 16 de septiembre 2020 y 30 de abril 2021. Participaron 14 mujeres indígenas. Las técnicas aplicadas fueron: observación participante y entrevistas en profundidad. Los escenarios observados fueron tanto comunitarios como en el hogar, acompañando a las madres en sus actividades de la vida diaria. Resultados: En las narrativas de las madres se muestra cómo identifican los síndromes culturalmente delimitados desde su sistema de representaciones. Estos padecimientos responden al sistema de conocimientos locales —de la propia comunidad— y no tienen traducción por la biomedicina. De los síndromes culturalmente delimitados presentes en esta comunidad, se destacan dos “el espanto” y “el aire”. A partir de los saberes maternos se describe cómo los delimitan y clasifican: pronóstico o gravedad y el itinerario terapéutico o proceso de atención que inician. Conclusiones: En “el espanto” y “el aire”, las representaciones sociales de las comunidades indígenas andinas influyen en la decisión del tratamiento, reconociendo que en la biomedicina no encontraran respuesta para este tipo de afecciones, pero en cambio sí en la Medicina Tradicional indígena. El conocimiento de los síndromes culturalmente delimitados, pone en valor la aplicación de cuidados interculturales a las personas indígenas, ya sea en sus propias comunidades de origen, como en los contextos migratorios donde éstas se asienten.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.
The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.
Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.
To assess the impact of a nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme versus usual follow-up in patients who have suffered an acute coronary syndrome in terms of major adverse clinical events (MACE), diet, physical exercise, smoking, emotional state, adherence to medical treatment, cardiometabolic profile and anthropometric parameters within one year of discharge.
Prospective, randomised, open-label, evaluator-blinded, multicentre trial.
Between October 17, 2017, and February 5, 2023, patients were randomly assigned to either a usual follow-up of two cardiology visits over 12 months or the nurse-led remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme, which also included 5 nursing visits (one face-to-face and four remote).
At 12 months, the nurse-led remote prevention programme group (interventional group) had lower smoking rates, greater adherence to medication, greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, more physical activity, and better perceived health status compared to the usual follow-up group. The interventional group demonstrated a reduction in major adverse clinical events (20.7%) compared to the usual follow-up group (12.4%). This reduction was observed particularly in Acute Coronary Syndrome recurrence, all-cause hospitalisation, and hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes.
Patients randomised to the nurse-led remote prevention programme showed a significant reduction of the MACE, improved lifestyle, and medication adherence at 12 months compared to the usual follow-up group.
This study illustrates the feasibility and efficacy of a remote secondary cardiovascular prevention programme led by advanced practice nurses in patients who have suffered an Acute Coronary Syndrome.
CONSORT.
None.
The study was prospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03234023
by Wendy C. Hernández-Mazariegos, Felipe I. Torres, Manuel Rodríguez, Christian M. Ibáñez, Luis E. Escobar, Federico J. Villatoro
Cockroaches are vectors of pathogens and parasites that pose public health risks, especially in developing countries with poor hygiene and inadequate infrastructure. This study aimed to identify the household factors associated with the occurrence of cockroaches and the helminth parasites they carry in a rural community. Data on household infrastructure, presence of domestic animals, and insect control methods were collected from 70 households in rural Guatemala. Cockroaches were captured using traps and manually. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model revealed that households with concrete roofs had 94% lower abundance of cockroaches than those with metal sheet roofs, while the presence of cats increased cockroach abundance by 2.6 times (p Moniliformis moniliformis, were identified, marking the first report of such parasites in household cockroaches in Guatemala. These results highlight the need for improved housing infrastructure and integrated pest management strategies to mitigate the risks associated with cockroach-borne parasites in vulnerable communities.Many patients receive oral anticoagulation for reduced stroke risk in atrial fibrillation or as treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism. Oral factor Xa inhibitors (oral FXaI, eg, apixaban, edoxaban or rivaroxaban) are commonly prescribed for this indication. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is similarly approved. In vitro and animal model evidence suggests that dabigatran also has direct effects on Staphylococcus aureus virulence and infection. Observational data have shown that dabigatran users are less likely to develop S. aureus bacteremia (SAB), and a small randomised controlled trial showed that dabigatran has anti-S. aureus effects when compared with low molecular weight heparins during bloodstream infection. We seek to answer whether dabigatran is superior to the oral FXaIs in achieving better SAB outcomes among patients who independently require oral anticoagulation. We report the intervention-specific protocol, embedded in an adaptive platform trial.
The S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial [NCT05137119] is a pragmatic, randomised, multicentre adaptive platform trial that compares different SAB therapies for 90-day mortality rates. For this intervention (‘Dabi-SNAP’), patients receiving therapy with an oral FXaI will be randomised to continue as usual or to change to dabigatran as of the next scheduled dose. All subjects will receive standard of care antibiotics and/or antibiotics allocated through other active domains in the platform. As the choice of anticoagulant may not demonstrate large differences in mortality, a ranked composite of death and adverse outcomes (Desirability of Outcome Ranking, or DOOR) was chosen as the primary outcome.
The study is conditionally approved by the research ethics board of the McGill University Health Centre: identifier 2025-10900. Trial results will be published open access in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a global infectious disease conference. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT06650501.
FreshRSS 