FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Biphasic sleep in shift workers and its related outcomes: a scoping review protocol

Por: Moen · L. V. · Lie · J.-A. S. · Jorgensen · I. L. · Frojd · L. · Pallesen · S. · Matre · D.
Introduction

Shift work is associated with disrupted sleep, circadian misalignment and increased risks of adverse health, performance and safety outcomes. Although recommendations for shift workers typically focus on obtaining one long sleep period, many shift workers divide sleep into two episodes, referred to as biphasic sleep. Biphasic sleep may help mitigate sleep loss-related impairments, yet its prevalence, characteristics and potential benefits for shift working populations remain unclear. Existing reviews have examined sleep duration, mental health, or the consequences of shift work broadly, but none have specifically mapped evidence comparing biphasic and monophasic sleep between shifts. This scoping review will identify and summarise the available literature on biphasic sleep among adult shift workers. In addition, we will describe the outcomes and subsequently highlight any possible gaps to inform future research.

Methods and analysis

This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Biphasic sleep is defined as two distinct sleep episodes within a 24-hour period between work shifts, including two similarly timed sleep periods or one longer sleep combined with a shorter nap. A comprehensive search will be conducted in April 2026 in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CENTRAL using controlled vocabulary (eg, Medical Subject Headings) and free-text terms related to shift work and split sleep. Peer-reviewed primary research examining biphasic sleep among adult shift workers will be included, and studies focusing solely on naps during work hours will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standardised template including study characteristics, sleep parameters and reported outcomes. Results will be summarised descriptively and presented in tables and evidence maps. No statistical synthesis will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination

This scoping review will synthesise data from articles published in peer-reviewed journals. As no primary data will be collected and no human participants will be involved, the review is exempted from formal ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated in terms of a peer-reviewed publication and will inform future systematic reviews on sleep strategies among shift workers.

Trial registration number

This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at 10.17605/OSF.IO/WY7KJ.

Left atrial strain and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study

Por: Özbek · B. T. · Modin · D. · Sengelov · M. · Jorgensen · P. G. · Bruun · N. E. · Fritz-Hansen · T. · Biering-Sorensen · T.
Background

The prognostic value of left atrial (LA) strain in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study investigated the prognostic value of LA strain in HFrEF patients in relation to all-cause mortality.

Methods

A total of 822 echocardiograms from HFrEF patients admitted to a heart failure clinic were analysed offline. To calculate left atrial reservoir strain (LA RS) and left atrial contractile strain (LA CS), LA two-dimensional speckle tracking was performed in the 4-chamber, 2-chamber and 3-chamber view. The end-point was all-cause mortality. The association between LA strain parameters and outcome was examined using Cox regression.

Results

The median follow-up time was 40 months and follow-up was 100% complete. During follow-up, a total of 137 patients (16.7%) died of all causes. In a final multivariable model adjusted for clinical and echocardiographic parameters including global longitudinal strain, LA RS and LA CS were significantly associated with all-cause death during follow-up (LA RS, HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99, p=0.014, pr. 1% increase) (LA CS, HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98, p=0.002, pr. 1% increase).

When added to the final multivariable model, both LA RS and LA CS contributed with incremental prognostic value as determined by C-statistic (LA RS: C-stat difference 0.007, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.020, p=0.050) (LA CS: C-stat difference 0.009, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.023, p=0.030).

Conclusion

In HFrEF patients, LA RS and LA CS were associated with all-cause mortality and contributed incremental prognostic value in addition to established prognostic measures.

Effect of digital intervention in the self-management of depressive symptoms: the MENTINA trial - a study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial

Por: Faurholt-Jepsen · M. · Dyreholt · M. S. · Kyster · N. B. · Iversen · N. · Kortsen · E. M. · Amann · B. L. · Hogg · B. · Gatto · D. · Cordoba · C. d. · Petrovic · M. · Allenhof · C. · Schnitzspahn · K. · Reich · H. · Budtz-Jorgensen · E. · Kessing · L. V. · Hegerl · U.
Introduction

Depression and sub-diagnostic depressive syndromes are prevalent and associated with suffering and reduced life expectancy. Access to care is limited even in countries with developed healthcare systems. In this context, it is important to strengthen the self-management expertise of people suffering from depressive symptoms. Smartphones offer the possibilities for improved self-management based on long-term monitoring of symptoms.

The present multicentre randomised controlled trial (the Protecting mental health in times of change (MENTINA) trial) aims to evaluate whether (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+smartphone-based outcome evaluations versus (2) smartphone-based outcome evaluations alone will improve depressive symptoms and other clinically relevant outcomes in participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more prior depressive episodes during a 12-month trial period.

Methods and analysis

The MENTINA trial is a multicentre randomised controlled parallel-group trial conducted in Denmark, Germany and Spain. Participants with current depressive symptoms and/or one or more previous depressive episodes are invited to participate. The included participants will be randomised to (1) daily smartphone-based monitoring and automatic rule-based feedback+outcome evaluations via smartphone (intervention group) or (2) outcome evaluations via smartphone alone (control group). All participants can continue with ongoing treatment in case they receive it. The trial started in May 2025 and has currently included 115 participants. The outcomes are differences between the intervention group and the control group in (1) Patient Health Questionnaire 9-items (PHQ-9) measured every 14th day during the 12-month trial period (primary), (2) WHO Quality of Life-BREF, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, monthly change in PHQ-9, proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in PHQ-9, remission rate defined as PHQ-9≤9 and ≥5-point improvement, PHQ-9 scores after 6 months, area under the curve for PHQ-9 over the 12 months trial period, subgroup analyses in PHQ-9 in participants with or without lifetime depression, Perceived Stress Scale, user-reported healthcare contacts, usability of the app and negative effects, number of depressive episodes+duration and depressive-free days based on PHQ-9. A total of 660 participants will be included in the MENTINA trial.

Ethics and dissemination

The MENTINA trial is funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement No. 101 080 651. Ethical approval and approval from Medical Agencies have been obtained from Denmark (CIV-25-02-051094), Germany (CIV-25-02-05109) and Spain (CIV-25-02-051094). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, presented at scientific meetings and disseminated to patients’ organisations and media outlets.

Trial registration number

NCT06919133.

Protocol version

Version 6, January 2026.

Hydrocortisone replacement therapy in patients with glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome after cessation of glucocorticoid treatment: REPLACE, a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, 16-week study protocol

Por: Dreyer · A. F. · Hansen · S. B. · Borresen · S. W. · Al-Jorani · H. · Bislev · L. S. · Boesen · V. B. · Christensen · L. L. · Glintborg · D. · Jensen · R. C. · Jorgensen · N. T. · Klose · M. C. · Lund · M. L. · Frederiksen · J. S. S. · Tei · R. · Feldt-Rasmussen · U. · Jorgensen · J.
Introduction

Glucocorticoid therapy is prescribed for a variety of inflammatory conditions and is associated with severe adverse effects. A glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome (GWS) may occur after prolonged glucocorticoid treatment—with or without biochemical glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GIAI). Previously, GWS was not considered an entity, probably due to the overlap between symptoms of GWS and GIAI. The Addison’s disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (AddiQoL-30) is a validated tool for quantifying symptoms of adrenal insufficiency resembling GWS. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that patients with a low AddiQoL-30 score and/or low cortisol response to a short Synacthen test (SST), after cessation of prednisolone treatment, may benefit from low-dose hydrocortisone therapy without increasing the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular disease during prolonged cortisol exposure.

Methods and analysis

REPLACE is a multi-centre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis after cessation of prednisolone treatment. Criteria for randomisation are an AddiQoL-30 score ≤85 and/or plasma cortisol response to SST, 30-min p-cortisol >100 and 85; and (2) patients with a SST-stimulated cortisol ≤100 nmol/L.

Ethics and dissemination

The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, registered at the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS: 2024-513822-53-00) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05193396), and publications will be in accordance with the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The trial is monitored by local independent Good Clinical Practice units and overseen by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal no. 21/27119), the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (project ID: S-20210076), the Danish Patient Safety Authority and the Danish Medicines Agency.

Trial registration number

NCT05193396.

Treatment of bulbar urethral strictures with Optilume drug-coated balloons in a previously untreated population (FIRST-CARE): protocol for a single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial

Por: Mahdi · M. B. · Haase · R. N. · Sander · L. · Tuckus · G. · Liltorp · D. L. · Jorgensen · L. · Graugaard-Jensen · C. H. · Weinreich · H. · Pennisi · C. P. · Nielsen · T. K.
Introduction

Minimally invasive endoscopic procedures constitute the cornerstone of first-line treatment for bulbar urethral strictures, although their long-term effectiveness is limited by high recurrence rates. The Optilume drug-coated balloon (DCB) is a novel intervention combining mechanical dilation with localised delivery of paclitaxel to reduce recurrence by inhibiting scar tissue formation. While its efficacy has been demonstrated in patients with recurrent strictures, its potential as a first-line option in treatment-naïve patients remains unexplored. The FIRST-CARE trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Optilume DCB compared with standard endoscopic treatment in treatment-naïve patients with bulbar urethral strictures.

Methods and analysis

Design: Two-arm, randomised, single-blind (participant), investigator-initiated, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial. Patients: The study will enrol 140 adult male patients with treatment-naïve, single bulbar urethral strictures ≤3 cm in length. Interventions: All patients will undergo the assigned procedure under general anaesthesia with 1.5 g intravenous cefuroxime. Optilume group patients will receive ≥5 min balloon dilation with localised paclitaxel delivery. The control group will receive standard endoscopic treatment (eg, direct visual internal urethrotomy, laser or dilatation). In both groups, a 12–14 French Foley catheter will be left in place for 3–5 days. Primary outcome: Freedom from repeat intervention within 12 months of follow-up. Primary analysis: Time-to-event will be defined from the date of intervention to the date a repeat intervention is decided (indicated and planned) due to confirmed recurrence, with censoring at 12 months. Groups will be compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. Cox regression and modified Poisson regression will be used to estimate HRs and relative risks.

Ethics and dissemination

The trial is approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics (2401370) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and principles of Good Clinical Practice. In line with national guidelines, all eligible patients are counselled regarding available treatment options prior to enrolment. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations.

Trial registration number

NCT06827210.

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant individuals in Quebec, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study from the Canadian Immunization Research Network

Por: Kiely · M. · Diendere · E. · Dialahy · I. · Perrault-Sullivan · G. · Brousseau · N. · Wei · S. Q. · Talbot · D. · Boutin · A. · Quach · C. · Jorgensen · S. · Boucoiran · I.
Objective

To estimate the association between maternal COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Design

Population-based retrospective cohort study using a hospitalisation database linked with other health administrative databases.

Setting

Province of Quebec, Canada, from 1 May 2021 to 30 June 2023.

Participants

All singleton pregnancies resulting in a live birth or stillbirth at ≥20 weeks of gestation, excluding those with a conception date

Primary outcome measures

We used robust Poisson regression models to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) for chorioamnionitis, postpartum haemorrhage, caesarean delivery, preterm birth, very preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), maternal and neonatal admission to intensive care unit (ICU, NICU) and severe neonatal morbidity. We used a Cox regression model with a time-varying exposure variable to estimate adjusted HRs (aHRs) for stillbirth. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for potential confounding.

Results

Among 140 073 singleton pregnancies resulting in live birth or stillbirth, 61 282 individuals (43.8%) received at least one dose of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. Vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of chorioamnionitis (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.04), postpartum haemorrhage (aRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.06), very preterm birth (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) and stillbirth (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.39). Vaccination during pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of caesarean delivery (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96), maternal ICU admission (aRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98), SGA (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98), NICU admission (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), preterm birth (aRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99) and severe neonatal morbidity (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Ongoing surveillance of the safety of maternal COVID-19 vaccination is essential as doses continue to be recommended for this group.

Short- and long-term complications after slowly resorbable biosynthetic P4HB mesh (Phasix) implantation in European centres: a protocol paper for a multiregistry study

Background

Phasix mesh is a fully resorbable synthetic mesh for use in clean and contaminated ventral incisional hernia repairs. Long-term absorbable Phasix mesh appears to be a safe and promising device in incisional hernia repair, with low recurrence rates; however, data on long-term complications after surgery, particularly after the resorption period of the mesh, are scarce.

Methods and analysis

This protocol describes a study of several European registries on the use of a Phasix mesh in incisional hernia repair. The primary endpoint of the study is long-term complications at 2–5 year follow-up after mesh implantation, with secondary endpoints including hernia recurrence and complications during short-term follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was not required for this protocol as the study is based on anonymised registry data collected with prior patient consent in each registry. Each participating registry has its own ethical approval process, and this study will adhere to those regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Intravenous immunoglobulin and prednisolone to women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Por: Norgaard-Pedersen · C. · Kesmodel · U. S. · Jorgensen · M. M. · Christiansen · O.
Objective

To investigate whether treatment with oral corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) improves pregnancy outcomes in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) following assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment.

Design

A randomised, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted from January 2021 to February 2024.

Setting

A single-centre trial at a Danish tertiary clinic for RPL management.

Participants

80 women with at least two consecutive early pregnancy losses following ART, age 18–41 years, body mass index below 35, and no identified cause of RPL. Forty participants were allocated to each group, with 37 fulfilling the protocol criteria in each group.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to receive either a combination of low-dose oral prednisolone starting on the first day of menstruation and IVIg given the first time around the time of embryo transfer; or matching placebo tablets and albumin infusions. Treatment continued until gestational week 8+4 in those who conceived with a total of four infusions.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcomes were the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) defined as a living fetus in gestational week 13 among all randomised participants and in those who conceived after embryo transfer, respectively, based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Secondary outcomes included safety outcomes related to pregnancy complications and neonatal health.

Results

OPR was equal to live birth rate. Among all randomised participants (ITT), the OPR was 25.0% in the treatment group and 15.0% in the placebo group (relative risk 1.67; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.15; p=0.26). Among participants without major protocol deviations (PP), OPRs were 21.6% and 16.2%, respectively (relative risk 1.33; 95% CI 0.51 to 3.47; p=0.55). Among participants who became pregnant following embryo transfer, ongoing pregnancy occurred in 83.3% of the treatment group and 42.9% of the placebo group (relative risk 1.94; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.75; p=0.05). No differences in adverse events or neonatal outcomes were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

The combination of oral corticosteroids and IVIg did not improve overall pregnancy rates in women with RPL after ART. However, among those who achieved pregnancy after embryo transfer, the risk of pregnancy loss appeared reduced. Larger randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04701034. Registration date: 5 January 2021

EudraCT number: 2020-000256-35; Registration date: 11 November 2020

The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics: N-20200066, Registration date: 16 December 2020

The Data Protection Agency: 2020-156; Registration date: 4 November 2020

WHO universal trial number: U1111-1273-8585

Date of first patient’s enrolment: 28 January 2021.

Protective and risk factors for eating disorders: protocol for a prospective cohort study of children at familial high risk (BLOOM)

Por: Jorgensen · M. S. · Schousboe · A. · Pappaianni · E. · Steinstad · L. · Eisemann · C. · Klitgard · M. · Micali · N.
Introduction

The aetiology of eating disorders (EDs) is complex, involving an interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Children at familial high risk (FHR) for EDs demonstrate increased risk of developing EDs themselves compared with children born to parents without EDs, though the majority remain unaffected. The BLOOM study is an FHR study that aims to identify biological, neurocognitive and psychosocial risk and protective pathways to EDs. Results of this study will help identify trait markers of EDs, inform targeted preventive intervention strategies and clarify how to mitigate genetic risk of EDs.

Methods and analysis

This prospective cohort study will enrol 510 children aged 8–10 years, including 360 at FHR for developing EDs (comprising 120 children each from mothers with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and binge ED) and 150 children not at FHR. Participants will be recruited over 2 years and followed up every 2 years. Data collection will include dual X-ray absorptiometry scans to evaluate body composition, saliva samples for genotyping, neurocognitive testing, self and parent-reported questionnaires and semistructured diagnostic interviews of psychopathology and well-being. Optional data collection will include fasting blood samples, stool samples and brain MRI scans. Mothers and secondary caregivers will complete questionnaires regarding family functioning and their mental health.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has been approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (p-2023-14826) and the Regional Ethics Committee of Health Research of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-23043100). Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated at scientific conferences, in peer-reviewed publications, PhD dissertations and to relevant stakeholders.

Early life determinants of skeletal maturation, body composition and endocrine health in young adults (EPIPEAK): protocol for a nationwide birth cohort study

Por: Händel · M. N. · Jorgensen · N. R. · Bybjerg-Grauholm · J. · Jansen · R. B. · Eiken · P. · Tofteng · C. L. · Hermann · A. P. · Bach-Mortensen · P. · Heitmann · B. L. · Rubin · K. H. · Langdahl · B. L. · Vestergaard · P. · Abrahamsen · B.
Introduction

Early-life exposures, such as nutritional deficiencies, stress, smoking, toxins, medications, diseases, infections and inflammation may affect multiple physiological and metabolic systems in the offspring, including hormonal regulation, bone metabolism and mineralisation, and body composition. Moreover, the effect of these early-life exposures on later health may potentially be mediated through adverse neonatal epigenetic reprogramming of bone-related genes affecting health later in life, especially skeletal development and bone density. Thus, to advance this research further, the overall aim of the project is to investigate if (a) neonatal epigenetic and genetic signature; (b) maternal risk factors during preconception and pregnancy, such as medicine use, diseases, socioeconomic status, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle; (c) risk factors at birth, such as instrumental delivery, mode of delivery, medicine use, injuries, diseases, weight, size for gestational age, ponderal index, gestational age; and (d) childhood risk factors, such as diseases, medicine use, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle are associated with hormonal status, lipids, bone turnover markers, bone mineral density, fat mass and lean body mass at age 18–19 years.

Methods and analysis

Population-based, nationwide, cross-sectional clinical study with potential for longitudinal reassessment. Danish women and men aged 18–19 years old will be selected at random from the Danish National Population Registry and invited if they have available neonatal dried blood spot cards. A total of 2000 individuals will be enrolled. The study combines register data, and neonatal epigenetic and genetic analyses from stored blood with clinical and survey data. Body composition will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Adult blood and hair samples will be obtained to assess hormonal status, lipids and bone turnover markers. Height, weight, waist and hip circumference, and blood pressure will be measured. Questionnaires on well-being, sleep patterns, dietary and exercise habits, onset of puberty, use of cannabis, nicotine, alcohol and pain medication will be included. Information on medicine use, diseases, socioeconomic status, major life events, weight, growth and lifestyle will be obtained from the national administrative and health registers at the time of conception and during pregnancy for the parents, as well as from the participants throughout their lifetime. Health registries include the Danish Medical Birth Register, the National Patient Register, the Danish National Prescription Register, the National Child Health Register and Statistics Denmark. Multivariate regression analyses will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination

This nationwide study has been approved by the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20230105). The study participants will be enrolled in the study following their informed written consent. Results will be submitted for publication. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement guidelines will be used for reporting.

Trial registration number

NCT06509776.

Active versus sham transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field headband treatment for major depression: protocol for a double-blinded randomised trial

Por: Brandborg Sorensen · N. · Haahr · U. · Larsen · M. P. · Hansen · J. · Nyholm · S. · Videbech · P. · Bohr · T. · Miskowiak · K. W. · Martiny · K. · Jorgensen · M. B.
Introduction

A substantial number of patients with major depressive disorder experience non-remission despite treatment with psychotherapy and several antidepressant drugs. This has increased the interest in new treatment strategies, including non-invasive brain stimulation methods. This randomised controlled trial examines a new treatment method using transcranial-pulsed electromagnetic fields (T-PEMF) delivered via a MoodHeadBand (MHB). The main study objective is to examine the antidepressant effect of T-PEMF on moderate to severe depression.

Methods and analysis

A double-blinded, randomised (1:1), sham-controlled trial with 96 participants diagnosed with moderate to severe depression without psychotic symptoms, recruited from Psychiatric Center Copenhagen. Participants receive daily 30 min at-home T-PEMF or sham treatment for 8 weeks with the MHB. Depressive symptomatology is examined using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (primary outcome) and Hamilton-D-17 Items Rating Scale at baseline and treatment completion. Cognitive functions are examined using a battery of emotion-laden and non-emotion-laden tests at baseline, after 1 week and at treatment completion. The participants fill out the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) and sleep logs weekly. Summary statistics, generalised linear models, proc mixed models, mixed model repeated measures and Kaplan-Meier analysis will be applied as appropriate to analyse data on depressive symptoms, cognition and sleep.

Ethics and dissemination

The Danish Medicines Agency (CIV-23-01-041987) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee (2215332) have approved the trial. The project concurs with the EU directive for medical devices 2017/745 of 5 April 2017 and the ISO 14155 standard. Participants give written informed consent before any trial-related activities. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

Trial registration number

NCT06005103.

Brachial plexus nerve block versus haematoma block for closed reduction of distal radius fracture in adults: The BLOCK Trial - a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Por: Dupont Harwood · C. · Jellestad · A.-S. L. · Bahuet · A.-X. R. · Knudsen · R. L. · Andersen · L. C. · Mathiesen · O. · Asko Andersen · J. · Jakobsen · J. C. · Rothe · C. · Jorgensen · C. C. · Viberg · B. · Brorson · S. · Brabrand · M. · Gundtoft · P. H. · Terndrup · M. · Lange · K. H.
Introduction

Distal radius fractures account for one-fifth of all fractures in the active elderly population and may cause chronic pain, loss of hand function and reduced work productivity, imposing a significant socioeconomic burden. Most are initially treated with closed reduction and casting, but 30% subsequently require surgery due to insufficient realignment. The current approaches for analgesia for closed reduction are suboptimal. A brachial plexus nerve block provides complete pain relief and muscle relaxation distal to the elbow, potentially creating better conditions for realignment of the fractured bone ends. This may ultimately translate into reduced need for surgery and result in better functional outcomes and fewer complications compared to a haematoma block, which is the current standard care in Denmark.

Methods and analysis

The BLOCK Trial is an investigator-initiated, parallel-group, allocation-concealed, outcome assessor and analyst-blinded, superiority, randomised, controlled, clinical multicentre trial performed at 11 Danish emergency departments. Eligible adult patients with a distal radius fracture who need closed reduction will be included and allocated 1:1 to either an ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block or a haematoma block. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with distal radius fracture surgery 90 days after closed reduction. We will include 1716 participants to detect or discard a relative risk reduction of surgery of 20%. Secondary outcomes include treatment-related complications, patient-reported wrist function, pain during closed reduction and proportion of patients with unacceptable radiographic fracture position immediately after closed reduction.

Ethics and disseminationf

The trial is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Research Ethics Committees (EU CT number: 2024-512191-35-00). All results will be summarised on www.theblocktrial.com, clinicaltrials.gov and euclinicaltrials.eu after publication. Primary and secondary outcome results from 0 to 90 days will be presented in the main article and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Results from outcomes on the 12-month follow-up will be presented separately.

Trial registration number

NCT06678438.

❌