FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Youth Med.Info: a case study in co-design of mental health medicines-information resources for children, young people and their parents/guardians

Por: Hynes-Ryan · C. · Kelleher · I. · Kathryn · S. · Beaudelot · C. · Carolan · A. · Columb · D. · Donnelly · S. · Gamage · N. · Hill · N. · Migone · M. · McWilliams · S. · Morning · J. · ODonoghue · B. · Solan · I. · Strawbridge · J. · Hayden · J. C. · Keating · D.
Objectives

To address the lack of accurate and accessible mental health medicines-information resources for children, young people and their parents/guardians using design thinking to co-design free-to-use, video resources tailored to this audience.

Design

A multiphase qualitative case study using the Double Diamond model of Design Thinking: Discover, Define, Develop and Deliver. This included iterative prototyping, thematic analysis and public and patient involvement throughout.

Setting

Dublin, Ireland with online distribution of the final resources internationally through a free, open-access platform.

Participants

A multidisciplinary co-design team including two specialist mental health pharmacists, two academic pharmacists, five consultant psychiatrists, a psychiatric nurse, a youth content specialist, three youth activists and a parent representative.

Results

26 co-designed, medicines-information videos were created, including versions for children (voiced by children), parents/guardians and young people. Videos feature storytelling formats with Bitmoji characters. Feedback from youth and parent collaborators guided design and content. Since launch, www.youthmed.info has had over 25 000 website views and more than 30 000 video views, with engagement from over 91 countries. The resources are also linked on national and international clinical and charity platforms.

Conclusions

Youth Med.Info addresses a gap in accessible, accurate mental health medicines-information by placing users – children, young people, parents/guardians and clinicians—at the centre of its design.

Duplex ultrasound after endo revascularisation (DUSTER): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial

Por: Gadi · N. · Moore · C. · Hayden · K. · Zhang · J. · Beetar · G. · Rogers · S. · Smith-Ball · C. · Davies · A. · Thapar · A.
Introduction

Endovascular therapy is the main treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia in the UK. Despite a restenosis risk of 50% over 2 years, reintervention rates are low, potentially resulting in preventable amputations. European guidelines recommend ultrasound surveillance to facilitate early treatment of restenosis. This study will investigate the use of duplex ultrasound after endo revascularisation (DUSTER). The aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact on clinical decision-making of a 1-year integrated ultrasound surveillance programme after lower limb endovascular therapy.

Methods and analysis

DUSTER is a mixed-methods study. Phase I is a three-site, feasibility, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The standard of care, the control arm, is standard clinical surveillance by a vascular specialist at 1, 6 and 12 months. The intervention arm will receive integrated ultrasound (ankle-brachial pressure index, toe pressure and duplex) plus standard clinical surveillance. Primary outcomes are rates of attendance and completion of ultrasound surveillance tests, as well as the percentage of participants undergoing reintervention for restenosis. Secondary outcomes are limb salvage, amputation-free survival, reasons for amputation, complications, serious adverse events and mortality.

Phase II comprises independent semistructured interviews with intervention arm participants. The interviews will explore barriers and facilitators to ultrasound surveillance and the effect of ultrasound surveillance on patients’ lives.

Phase III has two separate focus groups for participants and clinical stakeholders to identify which outcomes matter most in any subsequent large-scale effectiveness trials.

Ethics and dissemination

This research has been approved by a UK (West Midlands, Black Country) Research Ethics Committee (reference 24/WM/0232) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS 349192). Dissemination of results will be by the DUSTER co-investigators in peer-reviewed journals, to the National Institute for Health and Care Research and to a lay audience via the Mid and South Essex NHS Foundations Trust website.

Trial registration number

NCT06702306.

❌